Zostera Marina) by Mobile Epifauna and Macrofauna

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Zostera Marina) by Mobile Epifauna and Macrofauna W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2002 Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on the Utilization of Eelgrass (Zostera marina) by Mobile Epifauna and Macrofauna Scott R. Marion College of William and Mary - Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons Recommended Citation Marion, Scott R., "Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on the Utilization of Eelgrass (Zostera marina) by Mobile Epifauna and Macrofauna" (2002). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539617783. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.25773/v5-65zy-f462 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EFFECTS OF HABITAT FRAGMENTATION ON THE UTILIZATION OF EELGRASS (ZOSTERA M ARINA ) BY MOBILE EPIFAUNA AND MACROFAUNA A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the School of Marine Science The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of M aster of Science by Scott R. Marion December 2002 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science X c J t d . 1 Y U ^ Scott R. Marion Approved, December 2002 Robert J. Orth, Ph.D. Committee Chairman/Advisor J/Emmett Duffy, Ph.D Carl T. Friedrichs, Ph.D. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES.............................................................................................................................. v LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................................................... vi ABSTRACT.........................................................................................................................................vii INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................ 2 METHODS............................................................................................................................................. 6 RESULTS............................................................................................................................................ 15 DISCUSSION ...................................................................................................................................... 22 LITERATURE CITED......................................................................................................................49 VITA 97 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to acknowledge the generous support and encouragement of my advisor, Dr. Robert J. Orth. His unending enthusiasm for field ecology has been a continuous source of positive energy and ideas, and his generous provision of research support made this work possible. I also wish to acknowledge the guidance and helpful reviews of my committee members, Dr. Romuald N. Lipcius, Dr. J. Emmett Duffy, and Dr. Carl T. Friedrichs. Their critical reviews and thoughtful suggestions greatly improved the manuscript. I am especially grateful to the many members of the VIMS SAV Program who gave enormous assistance. Amy Tillman, Eric Slominsky, and Amy Macdonald were tireless sample pickers. Jamie Fishman, A1 Lombana, David Combs, Jacques van Montfrans, and JJ Orth assisted with seagrass transplanting and sample collection. David Wilcox was an invaluable resource for GIS expertise and data processing. Finally, I would like to thank the Virginia Salt Water Recreational Fishing License Fund for project funding, and the VIMS Mini-Grant program, the VIMS Dean’s Fellowship, and the Commonwealth of Virginia for additional financial support. iv LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. S item ap ...........................................................................................................................................61 2. Experimental eelgrass plots.......................................................................................................62 3. Arrangement of experimental plots at the James River site ............................................... 63 4. Edge-interior sampling scheme ................................................................................................64 5. Shoot density in transplanted eelgrass plots in the spring ..................................................65 6. Grass biomass in core samples .................................................................................................66 7. Diver estimates of seagrass percent cover ............................................................................67 8. Photo-interpreted seagrass percent cover .............................................................................. 68 9a. Densities of six epifaunal amphipods in core samples ......................................................69 9b. Densities of isopods and infaunal amphipods in core samples .......................................70 9c. Densities of fauna in suction samples ..............................................................................71 10a. Edge and interior densities of six epifaunal amphipods in cores samples ........... 72 10b. Edge and interior densities of isopods and infaunal amphipods in cores samples...73 10c. Edge and interior densities of fauna in suction samples......................................... 74 11. Caprellid amphipod size distribution ...................................................................................75 12. Biomass and secondary production in core samples ..........................................................76 13. Edge and interior densities for total individuals in suction samples ............................ 77 14. Size distribution of blue crabs ................................................................................................78 15. Aerial photograph of fall Medium plot ................................................................................79 16. Simulation model examining effects of skewed sampling effort....................................80 v LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Relative abundance of fauna in core and suction samples ................................................ 81 2. Number of samples included in core analyses ........................................................................82 3. Summary of statistical results.....................................................................................................83 4. Split-plot ANOVA results for spring core samples at both sites ...............................84-85 5. Split-plot ANOVA results for core samples within each site .....................................86-87 6. Two-way ANOVA results for spring core samples......................................................... 88 7. One-way ANOVA results for Plot Type effects on core samples..................................... 89 8. One-way ANOVA results for Site effects within each plot type ................................... 90 9. Paired f-test results for core and suction samples .............................................................. 91 10. ANCOVA examining trends in grass biomass along each site...................................... 92 11. Split-plot ANOVA results for spring suction samples at both sites ...............................93 12. Split-plot ANOVA results for spring suction samples at single sites .............................94 13. Two-way ANOVA results for suction samples................................................................ 95 14. One-way ANOVA results for Plot Type effects within each site ................................ 96 15. Perimeter:area ratios of experimental plots .........................................................................97 vi Abstract The threat to biodiversity posed by increasing rates of anthropogenic habitat fragmentation necessitates an understanding of the consequences of spatial pattern for natural communities. Reduction of patch size, loss of habitat, changes in the quantity and proportion of habitat edge, and reduced connectivity among habitats can all shape ecological processes and faunal behavior. Seagrass habitats provide a natural model system for examining spatial influences on marine fauna, but separating the effects of habitat structure, environmental conditions, and spatial pattern is difficult because shoot density, percent cover, and hydrodynamic regime often co-vary with patch size. This study used experimentally manipulated seagrass patches to measure the response of seagrass-associated fauna to patch size and bed fragmentation on the scale of meters. Replicate plots were created by transplanting eelgrass, Zostera marina, at two sites in the lower Chesapeake Bay, USA. Plots were designed to examine effects of patch size and bed fragmentation on the density of epibenthic decapod and peracarid crustaceans (crabs, shrimps, amphipods, and isopods), gastropods, and demersal fish. Densities of most species examined did not vary significantly among fragmented and unfragmented plots, or among plots with differing amounts of habitat area. Furthermore, seasonal edge effects were observed within both fragmented and unfragmented plots for
Recommended publications
  • The 17Th International Colloquium on Amphipoda
    Biodiversity Journal, 2017, 8 (2): 391–394 MONOGRAPH The 17th International Colloquium on Amphipoda Sabrina Lo Brutto1,2,*, Eugenia Schimmenti1 & Davide Iaciofano1 1Dept. STEBICEF, Section of Animal Biology, via Archirafi 18, Palermo, University of Palermo, Italy 2Museum of Zoology “Doderlein”, SIMUA, via Archirafi 16, University of Palermo, Italy *Corresponding author, email: [email protected] th th ABSTRACT The 17 International Colloquium on Amphipoda (17 ICA) has been organized by the University of Palermo (Sicily, Italy), and took place in Trapani, 4-7 September 2017. All the contributions have been published in the present monograph and include a wide range of topics. KEY WORDS International Colloquium on Amphipoda; ICA; Amphipoda. Received 30.04.2017; accepted 31.05.2017; printed 30.06.2017 Proceedings of the 17th International Colloquium on Amphipoda (17th ICA), September 4th-7th 2017, Trapani (Italy) The first International Colloquium on Amphi- Poland, Turkey, Norway, Brazil and Canada within poda was held in Verona in 1969, as a simple meet- the Scientific Committee: ing of specialists interested in the Systematics of Sabrina Lo Brutto (Coordinator) - University of Gammarus and Niphargus. Palermo, Italy Now, after 48 years, the Colloquium reached the Elvira De Matthaeis - University La Sapienza, 17th edition, held at the “Polo Territoriale della Italy Provincia di Trapani”, a site of the University of Felicita Scapini - University of Firenze, Italy Palermo, in Italy; and for the second time in Sicily Alberto Ugolini - University of Firenze, Italy (Lo Brutto et al., 2013). Maria Beatrice Scipione - Stazione Zoologica The Organizing and Scientific Committees were Anton Dohrn, Italy composed by people from different countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Primer Registro De Caprella Scaura Y Caprella Penantis (Crustacea: Peracarida: Amphipoda) En La Laguna Madre, Tamaulipas, México
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 84: 989-993, 2013 Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 84: 989-993, 2013 DOI: 10.7550/rmb.31501 DOI: 10.7550/rmb.31501989 Nota científica Primer registro de Caprella scaura y Caprella penantis (Crustacea: Peracarida: Amphipoda) en la laguna Madre, Tamaulipas, México First record of Caprella scaura and Caprella penantis (Crustacea: Peracarida: Amphipoda) in the Laguna Madre, Tamaulipas, Mexico Gabino A. Rodríguez-Almaraz y Víctor M. Ortega-Vidales Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León. Av. Universidad s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, 66451 San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo León, México. [email protected] Resumen. Se registran por primera vez los anfípodos caprélidos Caprella scaura y C. penantis en la laguna Madre de Tamaulipas. Ambas especies son cosmopolitas y con numerosos registros exóticos alrededor del mundo. El registro de C. scaura es también el primero en el suroeste del golfo de México. Este caprélido se recolectó entre mantos del alga verde Ulva lactuca adheridos en rocas de arenisca en la boca de Catán de esta laguna. Mientras que los especímenes de C. penantis se recolectaron entre el pasto marino Halodule wrightii. Palabras clave: Caprellidea, laguna Madre, Tamaulipas. Abstract. The caprellid amphipods Caprella scaura and C. penantis are recorded for first time in the Laguna Madre from Tamaulipas. Both species are cosmopolitan and with exotic numerous records worldwide. The finding of C. scaura is also the first record for the southwestern Gulf of Mexico. This caprellid was collected among green-algae Ulva lactuca that colonized tidal inlets at Laguna Madre. While that specimens of C.
    [Show full text]
  • Secretion of Embryonic Envelopes and Embryonic Molting Cycles In
    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 63(1): 189-198, 1998 CAPRELLA BATHYTATOS NEW SPECIES (CRUSTACEA, AMPHIPODA, CAPRELLIDAE), FROM THE MOUTHPARTS OF THE CRAB MACROREGONIA MACROCHIRA SAKAI (BRACHYURA, MAJIDAE) IN THE VICINITY OF DEEP-SEA HYDROTHERMAL VENTS OFF BRITISH COLUMBIA Joel W. Martin and Gary Pettit ABSTRACT Caprella bathytatos new species, is described from the mouthparts of spider crabs in the vicinity of deep-sea hydrothermal vents off British Columbia. The species was found attached to the setae of the third maxillipeds of the majid crab species Macroregonia macrochira, a vagrant associate of hydrothermal vents in this region. The new caprellid is morphologically very similar to Caprella ungulina Mayer, a species known from the mouthparts of lithodid (anomuran) crabs, but is characterized by a first gnathopod that lacks grasping spines and by pereopods having a notched propodus that facilitates attach­ ment to the host setae. This report extends the depth record for the genus Caprella to over 2200 m, is the first report of caprellids associated with brachyuran crab mouthparts as the primary (or only) substratum, and is the first record of any member of the family Caprellidae in the vicinity of marine hydrothermal vents. Amphipods of the family Caprellidae typically inhabit shallow marine waters where they are found most often in association with hydroids, bryozoans, or marine algae. Al­ though records exist for caprellids associated with echinoderms and cnidarians (Jones, 1970; Vader, 1972; Caine, 1983, Takeuchi and Hirano, 1995), there has been only one species of caprellid, Caprella ungulina Mayer, previously reported from the mouthparts of a decapod crustacean (reviewed by Takeuchi et al., 1989).
    [Show full text]
  • Invertebrate ID Guide
    11/13/13 1 This book is a compilation of identification resources for invertebrates found in stomach samples. By no means is it a complete list of all possible prey types. It is simply what has been found in past ChesMMAP and NEAMAP diet studies. A copy of this document is stored in both the ChesMMAP and NEAMAP lab network drives in a folder called ID Guides, along with other useful identification keys, articles, documents, and photos. If you want to see a larger version of any of the images in this document you can simply open the file and zoom in on the picture, or you can open the original file for the photo by navigating to the appropriate subfolder within the Fisheries Gut Lab folder. Other useful links for identification: Isopods http://www.19thcenturyscience.org/HMSC/HMSC-Reports/Zool-33/htm/doc.html http://www.19thcenturyscience.org/HMSC/HMSC-Reports/Zool-48/htm/doc.html Polychaetes http://web.vims.edu/bio/benthic/polychaete.html http://www.19thcenturyscience.org/HMSC/HMSC-Reports/Zool-34/htm/doc.html Cephalopods http://www.19thcenturyscience.org/HMSC/HMSC-Reports/Zool-44/htm/doc.html Amphipods http://www.19thcenturyscience.org/HMSC/HMSC-Reports/Zool-67/htm/doc.html Molluscs http://www.oceanica.cofc.edu/shellguide/ http://www.jaxshells.org/slife4.htm Bivalves http://www.jaxshells.org/atlanticb.htm Gastropods http://www.jaxshells.org/atlantic.htm Crustaceans http://www.jaxshells.org/slifex26.htm Echinoderms http://www.jaxshells.org/eich26.htm 2 PROTOZOA (FORAMINIFERA) ................................................................................................................................ 4 PORIFERA (SPONGES) ............................................................................................................................................... 4 CNIDARIA (JELLYFISHES, HYDROIDS, SEA ANEMONES) ............................................................................... 4 CTENOPHORA (COMB JELLIES)............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Animal-Sediment Study in the Lower York River- February 1965 To
    An Animal-Sediment Study in the Lower )~rk River - February 1965 to February 1966.1 By Dexter s. Haven, John N. Kraeuter, Richa.rd c. Swartz and Reinaldo Morales-Alamo Special Scientific Report No. 108 Virginia Institute of Marine Sci.ence and School of Marine Science, The College of William and Ma.ry Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 Frank o. Perkins Acting Director November 1981 1From Concentration of Suspended Radioactive Wastes Into Bottom Deposits Period. Final Report to the United States Atomic Energy Commission. Contract No. AT-(40-1)-2789 for the period 1 January 1961 to 31 December 1967. An Animal-Sediment Study in the Lower York River - February 1965 to February 1966.1 By Dexter S. Haven, John N. Kraeuter, Richard c. Swartz and Reinaldo Morales-Alamo Special Scientific Report No. 108 Virginia Institute of Marine SciEmce and School of Marine Science, The College of William and Mary Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 Frank o. Perkins Acting Director November 1981 1From Concentration of Suspended Radioactive Waste~s Into Bottom Deposits Period. Final Report to the United StatE!S Atomic Energy Commission. Contract No. AT-(40-1)-2789 for the period 1 January 1961 to 31 December 1967. FOREWORD The following study was funded by Contract No. AT-(40-1)-2789 with the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. The work. was completed in December 1967. The material presented here was e.xtracted from the final report. Since 1967, the taxonomy of various species has changed. Therefore, the taxonomy for those species has been updated here. An appendix is included which lists the species collected with the corresponding ten-digit VIMS taxonomic code.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Amphipoda of the Northeast Pacific
    Amphipoda of the Northeast Pacific (Equator to Aleutians, intertidal to abyss): VII. Caprelloidea – a review Donald B. Cadien, LACSD 22July04 (revised 20Apr15) Preface The purpose of this review is to bring together information on all of the species reported to occur in the NEP fauna. It is not a straight path to the identification of your unknown animal. It is a resource guide to assist you in making the required identification in full knowledge of what the possibilities are. Never forget that there are other, as yet unreported species from the coverage area; some described, some new to science. The natural world is wonderfully diverse, and we have just scratched its surface. Anthropogenic transport is also constantly introducing exotic species into our area, particularly in this superfamily. Introduction to the Caprelloidea Until recent years the caprellids were viewed as a separate suborder of the order Amphipoda, equivalent to the gammarids and the hyperiids. The discovery of the caprogammarids (Kudrjashov & Vassilenko 1966) began to call this into question (McCain 1968, 1970; Laubitz 1976, J. L. Barnard & Karaman 1983), and, following the revisionary work of Myers and Lowry (2003), they are fully nested into the gammaroids based on morphologically based cladistic analysis of their phylogeny. This position was retained in the larger analysis of Lowry & Myers (2013) which established the senticaudates, to which all of the caprellidians belong. Not all workers are willing to accept the revisions of Myers and Lowry, particularly Stella Vassilenko, who feels that it is inappropriate and based on the wrong evidence (Vassilenko 2006). She feels that caprellids should retain their own separate suborder as Caprellidea, and that Cyamida and Caprellida both should retain infraordinal rank.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinburgh Encyclopedia;
    THE DINBURGH ENCYCLOPEDIA; CONDUCTED DY DAVID BREWSTER, LL.D. \<r.(l * - F. R. S. LOND. AND EDIN. AND M. It. LA. CORRESPONDING MEMBER OF THE ROYAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF PARIS, AND OF THE ROYAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF TRUSSLi; JIEMBER OF THE ROYAL SWEDISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES; OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF SCIENCES OF DENMARK; OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF GOTTINGEN, AND OF THE ROYAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF MODENA; HONORARY ASSOCIATE OF THE ROYAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF LYONS ; ASSOCIATE OF THE SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS; MEMBER OF THE SOCIETY OF THE AN­ TIQUARIES OF SCOTLAND; OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON, AND OF THE ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON; OF THE AMERICAN ANTlftUARIAN SOCIETY; HONORARY MEMBER OF THE LITERARY AND PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY OF NEW YORK, OF THE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF NEW YORK; OF THE LITERARY AND PHILOSOPHICAL SOClE'i'Y OF li riiECHT; OF THE PimOSOPHIC'.T- SOC1ETY OF CAMBRIDGE; OF THE LITERARY AND ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY OF PERTH: OF THE NORTHERN INSTITUTION, AND OF THE ROYAL MEDICAL AND PHYSICAL SOCIETIES OF EDINBURGH ; OF THE ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA ; OF THE SOCIETY OF THE FRIENDS OF NATURAL HISTORY OF BERLIN; OF THE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY OF FRANKFORT; OF THE PHILOSOPHICAL AND LITERARY SOCIETY OF LEEDS, OF THE ROYAL GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CORNWALL, AND OF THE PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY OF YORK. WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF GENTLEMEN. EMINENT IN SCIENCE AND LITERATURE. IN EIGHTEEN VOLUMES. VOLUME VII. EDINBURGH: PRINTED FOR WILLIAM BLACKWOOD; AND JOHN WAUGH, EDINBURGH; JOHN MURRAY; BALDWIN & CRADOCK J. M. RICHARDSON, LONDON 5 AND THE OTHER PROPRIETORS. M.DCCC.XXX.- .
    [Show full text]
  • Southeastern Regional Taxonomic Center South Carolina Department of Natural Resources
    Southeastern Regional Taxonomic Center South Carolina Department of Natural Resources http://www.dnr.sc.gov/marine/sertc/ Southeastern Regional Taxonomic Center Invertebrate Literature Library (updated 9 May 2012, 4056 entries) (1958-1959). Proceedings of the salt marsh conference held at the Marine Institute of the University of Georgia, Apollo Island, Georgia March 25-28, 1958. Salt Marsh Conference, The Marine Institute, University of Georgia, Sapelo Island, Georgia, Marine Institute of the University of Georgia. (1975). Phylum Arthropoda: Crustacea, Amphipoda: Caprellidea. Light's Manual: Intertidal Invertebrates of the Central California Coast. R. I. Smith and J. T. Carlton, University of California Press. (1975). Phylum Arthropoda: Crustacea, Amphipoda: Gammaridea. Light's Manual: Intertidal Invertebrates of the Central California Coast. R. I. Smith and J. T. Carlton, University of California Press. (1981). Stomatopods. FAO species identification sheets for fishery purposes. Eastern Central Atlantic; fishing areas 34,47 (in part).Canada Funds-in Trust. Ottawa, Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, by arrangement with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, vols. 1-7. W. Fischer, G. Bianchi and W. B. Scott. (1984). Taxonomic guide to the polychaetes of the northern Gulf of Mexico. Volume II. Final report to the Minerals Management Service. J. M. Uebelacker and P. G. Johnson. Mobile, AL, Barry A. Vittor & Associates, Inc. (1984). Taxonomic guide to the polychaetes of the northern Gulf of Mexico. Volume III. Final report to the Minerals Management Service. J. M. Uebelacker and P. G. Johnson. Mobile, AL, Barry A. Vittor & Associates, Inc. (1984). Taxonomic guide to the polychaetes of the northern Gulf of Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Caprella Drepanochir Class: Malacostraca Order: Amphipoda, Caprellidea a Skeleton Shrimp, Or Caprellid Amphipod Family: Caprellidae
    Phylum: Arthropoda, Crustacea Caprella drepanochir Class: Malacostraca Order: Amphipoda, Caprellidea A skeleton shrimp, or caprellid amphipod Family: Caprellidae Taxonomy: The Caprellidae are a very rather than laterally compressed (compare to distinctive family of amphipods. They were gammarid amphipods, e.g. Eogammarus previously a separate amphipod suborder, but confervicolus) (Kozloff 1993; Watling and were recently found to be polyphyletic, arising Carlton 2007). at least twice from different gammarid Cephalon: Round cephalon with no dorsal amphipod lineages (Laubitz 1993; Takeychi spines or tubercles (Fig. 1) (Laubitz 1976), 1993; Watling and Carlton 2007). Current however body spination is a highly variable research places them as highly modified trait among individuals (Watling and Carlton members of the suborder Corophiidea (Myers 2007). Head partially fused with the first and Lowry 2003; Watling and Carlton 2007), a pereonite (segment of pereon) and the first taxon divided into two infraorders (Caprellida, pair of gnathopods (Fig. 1). Pereonite one not Corophiida) each with different evolutionary more than twice as long as head in male feeding strategies and associated morphology (Laubitz 1970) and shorter in female (Laubitz (Myers and Lowry 2003). 1970) (Fig. 2). Rostrum: Cephalon without rostrum Descripton (Laubitz 1976). Size: The illustrated specimens (from Coos Eyes: Small (Laubitz 1976) (Fig. 1). Bay) include a 13 mm long male (Fig. 1) and Antenna 1: Less than half total body an 8 mm long female (Fig. 2) (Measured from length (Laubitz 1970). In males, the first anterior (head) to posterior (abdomen), antenna is approximately equal to the Laubitz 1970). Males collected in Japan were cephalon combined with pereonite two 13 mm (Arimoto et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Epifaunal Community Structure on Artificial Reefs in Tampa Bay
    T The Epifaunal Community Structure on Artificial Reefs in Tampa Bay Grant Agreement #FWCC-03045 Thomas L. Dix, Ph.D., Thomas M. Ash, David J. Karlen, Barbara K. Goetting, Christina M. Holden, Susan M. Estes, June 2005 #FWCC-0304 5 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding was provided by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (Grant Agreement # FWCC-03045). Stephen A .Grabe, Sara E. Markham and Anthony S. Chacour assisted with sample processing. Carla Wright assisted with instrument calibration. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................... ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................................. iv LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................. v ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 2 METHODS AND MATERIALS ............................................................................................................. 3 Study sites .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Unravelling the Origin and Introduction Pattern of the Tropical Species Paracaprella Pusilla Mayer, 1890
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal NeoBiotaUnravelling 47: 43–80 (2019) the origin and introduction pattern of the tropical species Paracaprella pusilla ... 43 doi: 10.3897/neobiota.47.32408 RESEARCH ARTICLE NeoBiota http://neobiota.pensoft.net Advancing research on alien species and biological invasions Unravelling the origin and introduction pattern of the tropical species Paracaprella pusilla Mayer, 1890 (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Caprellidae) in temperate European waters: first molecular insights from a spatial and temporal perspective M. Pilar Cabezas1, Macarena Ros2, António Múrias dos Santos1,3, Gemma Martínez-Laiz4, Raquel Xavier1, Lou Montelli5, Razy Hoffman6, Abir Fersi7,8, Jean Claude Dauvin8, José Manuel Guerra-García4 1 CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Rua Padre Armando Quintas nº7, 4485-661, Vairão, Portugal 2 Departamento de Biología, CASEM, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar y Ambientales, Universidad de Cádiz, Campus Universitario de Puerto Real, 11510, Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain 3 Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre s/n, 4169-007, Porto, Portugal 4 Laboratorio de Biología Marina, Departamento de Zoología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, Avda. Reina Mercedes 6, 41012, Seville, Spain 5 Maritime Platforms Division, Department of Defence, De- fence Science and Technology Organisation, Fishermans Bend Victoria, P.O. Box 4331, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia 6 The Steinhardt Museum of Natural History, Israel National Center for Biodiversity Studies, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel 7 Laboratoire de Biodiversité et Ecosystèmes Aquatiques, Faculté des Sciences de Sfax, Université de Sfax, BP 1171, 3038, Sfax, Tunisia 8 Normandie Université, UNICAEN, Laboratoire Morphodynamique Continentale et Côtière, CNRS, UMR 6143 M2C, 24 Rue des Tilleuls, 14000 Caen, France Corresponding author: M.
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of the Caprellid Amphipod Caprella Andreae Mayer, 1890 (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Caprellidae) from New Zealand
    BioInvasions Records (2014) Volume 3, Issue 2: 97–102 Open Access doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/bir.2014.3.2.07 © 2014 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2014 REABIC Rapid Communication First record of the caprellid amphipod Caprella andreae Mayer, 1890 (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Caprellidae) from New Zealand Chris Woods1*, Rissa Williams2 and Kevin Heasman3 1National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd, Private Bag 8602, Christchurch 8044, New Zealand 2Ministry for Primary Industries, PO Box 40742, Upper Hutt 5018, New Zealand 3Cawthron Institute, Private Bag 2, Nelson 7042, New Zealand E-mail: [email protected] (CW), [email protected] (RW), [email protected] (KH) *Corresponding author Received: 31 December 2013 / Accepted: 28 April 2014 / Published online: 16 May 2014 Handling editor: Michal Grabowski Abstract On 14 October 2012, two representative individuals (one male and one female) of an unidentified caprellid amphipod were collected from a mussel farm near Opotiki, northern New Zealand. These specimens were identified as Caprella andreae Mayer, 1890. This is the first record of this species from New Zealand waters and only the second record from the southern hemisphere. The wider distribution of C. andreae around New Zealand and any potential impacts are currently unknown. Key words: Caprella andreae, caprellid amphipod, non-indigenous species, New Zealand, mussel farm study represents the first record of a second non- Introduction indigenous species, Caprella andreae Mayer, 1890 from New Zealand waters and discusses its Caprellid amphipods are common inhabitants of potential impacts on the coastal ecosystem. many marine epibiotic fouling communities and are distinguished by their elongate, stick-like Methods body form and reduction of the abdominal appendages specialized for clinging to surfaces.
    [Show full text]