DOCSLIB.ORG

Walking and Transport in Melbourne Suburbs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Walking and Transport in Melbourne Suburbs Walking and transport in Melbourne suburbs Supported by: This report was prepared by Josephine Eady and The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance Duane Burtt, Victoria Walks. of the following people in preparing this report: Victoria Walks Inc is a walking health promotion charity Anita Donnelly, City of Port Phillip working to get more Victorians walking more every Ben Rossiter, Victoria Walks day. Our vision is people walk whenever and wherever Cameron Munro, CDM Research possible, within strong and vibrant communities, with Craig McLean, City of Port Phillip resulting health benefits. Victoria Walks is supported by VicHealth. David Vial, IOSS Karl Sass, City of Ballarat © Victoria Walks Inc. Registration No. A0052693U Kate Simnett, Maribyrnong City Council Level 7, 225 Bourke Street, Melbourne VIC 3000 Kathleen Kemp, City of Port Phillip P: 03 9662 3975 Kylie Legge, Place Score E: [email protected] Mike Ruzzene, Urban Enterprise www.victoriawalks.org.au Tuesday Udell, Heart Foundation Victoria Walks would also like to acknowledge the Victorian Department of Transport for advice and use This publication is copyright. No part may be of the VISTA data. reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. ISBN-13: 978-0-6480502-6-1 Recommended citation Eady, J and Burtt, D (2019). Walking and transport in Melbourne suburbs. Victoria Walks, Melbourne, November 2019. Table of Contents Executive summary .......................................................... 2 Length of time at local shops ......................................32 Walking in the transport system ....................................2 Spend by mode ..........................................................33 Perceptions of how people travel ...............................33 Walking and public transport ........................................3 Travel to shops and services ........................................3 Attributes people value in public space .....................35 Travel to suburban centres ...........................................4 Northcote Shopping Centre ........................................35 Recommendations ........................................................... 5 Sydney Road, Brunswick and Coburg .......................35 Recommendations to facilitate walking ........................5 South Melbourne .........................................................35 Recommendations for activity centres and Place Score .................................................................35 train stations ..................................................................5 Allocation of public space ..........................................37 Data related recommendations ....................................5 Design of shopping areas .............................................. 39 Introduction .......................................................................6 Case study – Acland Street Benefits of walking ........................................................7 (City of Port Phillip 2018) ............................................... 42 Walkable places make good economic sense .............8 Case study – Camberwell Factors influencing travel behaviour .............................8 (City of Boroondara 2015) .............................................. 44 Availability of information on walking ..........................10 Discussion ......................................................................46 Walking in Melbourne .................................................... 12 Implications for design ...............................................46 Walking mode share and distance .............................13 Encourage walking and make it convenient ...............46 Walking rates by age group .......................................14 Improve public transport operations and access .......................................................................46 Mode by gender .........................................................16 Reconsider car parking provisions and Walking rates by car ownership and licence ..............16 street design ...............................................................47 Purpose and length of walking trips ...........................17 Reallocate some road space currently used by Walking throughout the week .....................................19 private vehicles to benefit all of society ......................47 Public transport and walking ......................................20 Provide the evidence ..................................................47 Travel to the train station .............................................20 References ......................................................................48 Travel to bus and tram stops ......................................23 Appendix A Evaluating which trips to include Travel to shops and services ........................................ 24 in travel to shops and services ..................................... 52 Mode share to shops and services ............................25 Appendix B Shopping centre criteria and locations for VISTA analysis.......................................... 53 Reasons for choice of mode to local shops ...............30 Distance travelled to shops and services ...................30 Reasons for being at the local shops .........................32 WALKING AND TRANSPORT IN MELBOURNE SUBURBS 1 Executive Summary This report looks at how people travel around Melbourne, with a particular focus on the role of walking and access to suburban shopping centres. It includes analysis of Melbourne household travel data captured through the Victorian Integrated Survey of Travel and Activity (VISTA). No publicly available, detailed analysis of this data set has previously been carried out to understand the role of walking in the transport system. Like all household travel surveys, VISTA underreports short trips including walking, but it is one of the best sources of data on walking currently available. In addition to a literature review of published reports, Victoria Walks also sourced a range of unpublished data to gain the strongest possible understanding of access to suburban shopping centres. Walking in the transport system While most trips under 1 km are walked, 21% are still driven. If half of these short driving trips were replaced with walking, Walking is an important way for people to get around. The 223,000 short vehicle trips could be avoided every weekday in VISTA analysis finds that 16% of trips in Melbourne are walked Melbourne. and an additional 8% have at least one walking stage (24% In inner Melbourne, 39% of trip stages are walked, more than involve some walking), usually combined with public transport. twice that of outer Melbourne (17%), but the median walk For every group between 20 and 90 years of age, around one distance is shorter (563 m compared to 710 m). This partly in three people who leave home on a given day will do some reflects design. Housing in inner Melbourne is generally high walking. For those aged 10-19, the proportion is higher at 44%, density with high quality public transport and shops, services reflecting their increased reliance on walking. and employment within short distance. Outer Melbourne generally has poorer walking environments and people have Walking is of course used primarily for short trips. Almost two- to travel further to access shops and services, with public thirds of total transport trips under 1 km are walked. However, transport and employment options limited or not available. people will commonly walk more than a kilometre, with almost one third of all trips between 1 and 2 km in length walked. Even in the growth areas, town centres do not have to be car-dominated. This main street town centre is in Point Cook, one of Melbourne’s newest suburbs. 2 WALKING AND TRANSPORT IN MELBOURNE SUBURBS Executive Summary Walking and public transport Analysis as part of this work considers shorter trips (less than 2 km) to shops and services across Melbourne. This reveals The VISTA analysis highlights the walking is a fundamental significant variation between business types, with people part of the public transport system. Nearly every trip involving walking for almost two-thirds of short trips to restaurants, public transport made in Melbourne also includes some cafes, pubs and bars. Half of short trips to milk bars, walking at either the origin or destination. newsagencies and general retail are walked, compared to 37% to supermarkets. The analysis finds that for trips from home, the median length of a walking trip to a train station is 721 metres, while the The research finds that the primary factor in people’s choices median walk to a bus stop is 390 m and to a tram stop is regarding how to travel to centres is perceived convenience, 360 m. These are in line with the commonly accepted irrespective of the mode they used to travel. distances of 800 m to a train station and 400 m to a bus stop. International research consistently finds that retailers under- Despite ongoing efforts by state and federal governments to estimate the number of people walking to their centre and facilitate driving to train stations through increasing numbers over-estimate the number of people driving. Two Melbourne of free car parks at suburban stations, walking is easily the studies looked at these perceptions, with the same outcome. most common way for people to access stations. Almost half For example, surveys on Sydney Road in Brunswick and of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Shopping Centres Still an Inconvenient Truth (Revisited in 2019) Shopping Centres - Still an Inconvenient Truth (Revisited in 2019)
    Shopping Centres still an Inconvenient Truth (Revisited In 2019) Shopping Centres - still an Inconvenient Truth (Revisited In 2019) By Peter Buckingham CFE CMC Managing Director – Spectrum Analysis Shopping Centres still an Inconvenient Truth (Revisited In 2019) Shopping Centres sàgll an By Peter Buckingham CFE CMC Managing Director – Spectrum Analysis Inconvenient Truth (Revisited In 2019) By Peter Buckingham CFE CMC Managing Director – Spectrum Analysis 1 Shopping Centres - still an Inconvenient Truth (Revisited In 2019) “How do shopping centre owners press for increases in rents of 4% How do shopping centre owners still press for increases in rents of 4% or or 5% p.a. when the increase in the $ / sq m. sold through the 5% pa. when the increase in the $ / sq m. sold through the Centres has Centres has been increasing in the range of 0.5% – 1.65% p.a. over been increasing in the range of -0.63% to 0.25% for Super, Major and the last few years?” Regional shopping centres over the last 2 years? – Peter Buckingham, Managing Director at Spectrum Analysis We have revisited the Property Council Shopping 2019 shows the state of shopping centres across Australia to be Centre data in 2019 and find things are far worse. deteriorating in $$$ performances against inflation – yet rents are expected to increase at much higher rates. Over the last 2 years, the group of the biggest shopping centres – 14 Super Regional shopping centres have: In 2017 we undertook a study of shopping centres and showed that although rents were increasing at around CPI plus 2 – 3% which equated 2 to around 4 – 5%, shopping centres were not growing at the same pace.
    [Show full text]
  • Property Portfolio 30 June 2020 About Stockland We Have a Long and Proud History of Creating Places That Meet the Needs of Our Customers and Communities
    Stockland Stockland PropertyPortfolio PropertyPortfolio Property Portfolio 30 June 2020 30 June 2020 30 June 2020 For personal use only stockland.com.au About Stockland We have a long and proud history of creating places that meet the needs of our customers and communities. OUR STORY When Stockland was founded in 1952, Ervin Graf had a vision “to not merely achieve growth and profits, but to make a worthwhile contribution to the development of our cities and great country”. Pursuing that vision has seen Stockland grow to become one of Australia’s largest diversified property groups. We develop and manage retail town centres, logistics, workplace properties, residential communities and retirement living villages. With the benefit of our diverse property skills, we connect different types of properties in shared locations, to create places that inspire people to gather, to share and to live life. We recognise our responsibilities to the environment and are a leader in sustainable business practices. For over 65 years, we have worked hard to grow our portfolio of assets and projects. We have a long and proud history of creating places that meet the needs of our customers and communities. OUR PROPERTY PORTFOLIO Stockland is one of Australia’s leading diversified property groups. We’re active in retail, logistics, workplace properties, residential communities and retirement living villages. This portfolio identifies all of our properties across Australia. More information on Stockland’s activities For personal use only and an online version of the portfolio data is available at www.stockland.com.au Image: Green Hills, NSW Property Portfolio Commercial Property ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transport Partnerships
    PUBLIC TRANSPORT PARTNERSHIPS An Overview of Passenger Rail Franchising in Victoria March 2005 Department of Infrastructure PUBLIC TRANSPORT PARTNERSHIPS An Overview of Passenger Rail Franchising in Victoria March 2005 Public Transport Division Department of Infrastructure © State of Victoria 2005 Published by Public Transport Division Department of Infrastructure 80 Collins Street, Melbourne March 2005 www.doi.vic.gov.au This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Authorised by the Victorian Government, 80 Collins Street, Melbourne. Minister’s Foreword In February 2004, after the failure of the original privatisation framework, the Victorian Government entered into new franchise agreements with Melbourne’s public transport companies, Yarra Trams and Connex. These partnership agreements find the balance between government support for public transport in Melbourne and the operational expertise provided by experienced private rail operators. Almost one year on, the new arrangements are running smoothly, providing stability across the public transport system and giving a solid foundation for a range of improvements in service delivery. Some of the other benefits to passengers that stem from these agreements include: • Additional front-line customer service staff; • Increased security patrols; • Improved driver training programs; • All night New Year’s Eve services; • Additional rolling stock; and • Improved standards for the upkeep of transport facilities. The key themes of this summary report include the background to the failure of the original contracts, the renegotiations, the nature of the new partnership agreements and the challenges of the refranchising process. You can obtain the latest information about Melbourne’s public transport by visiting www.doi.vic.gov.au/transport I commend this report to you.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Motorized Vehicles in Asia: Lessons for Sustainable Transport Planning and Policy
    Non-Motorized Vehicles in Asia: Lessons for Sustainable Transport Planning and Policy by Michael Replogle Abstract This paper provides an overview of the current use of non-motorized vehicles (NMVs) in Asian cities, the characteristics of NMVs and facilities that serve them, and policies that influence their use. The paper identifies conditions under which NMV use should be encouraged for urban transport, obstacles to the development of NMVs, and identifies desirable steps that might be taken to develop a Non-Motorized Transport Strategy for a city or region, in Asia and other parts of the world. NMVs offer low cost private transport, emit no pollution, use renewable energy, emphasize use of labor rather than capital for mobility, and are well suited for short trips in most cities regardless of income, offering an alternative to motorized transport for many short trips. Thus, they are appropriate elements in strategies dealing with poverty alleviation, air pollution, management of traffic problems and motorization, and the social and economic dimensions of structural adjustment. NMVs have a most important role to play as a complementary mode to public transportation. Cities in Asia exhibit widely varying modal mixes. NMVs -- bicycles, cycle-rickshaws, and carts -- now play a vital role in urban transport in much of Asia. NMVs account for 25 to 80 percent of vehicle trips in many Asian cities, more than anywhere else in the world. Ownership of all vehicles, including NMVs, is growing rapidly throughout Asia as incomes increase. However, the future of NMVs in many Asian cities is threatened by growing motorization, loss of street space for safe NMV use, and changes in urban form prompted by motorization.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxis As Urban Transport
    TØI report 1308/2014 Jørgen Aarhaug Taxis as urban transport TØI Report 1308/2014 Taxis as urban transport Jørgen Aarhaug This report is covered by the terms and conditions specified by the Norwegian Copyright Act. Contents of the report may be used for referencing or as a source of information. Quotations or references must be attributed to the Institute of Transport Economics (TØI) as the source with specific mention made to the author and report number. For other use, advance permission must be provided by TØI. ISSN 0808-1190 ISBN 978-82-480-1511-6 Electronic version Oslo, mars 2014 Title: Taxis as urban transport Tittel: Drosjer som del av bytransporttilbudet Author(s): Jørgen Aarhaug Forfattere: Jørgen Aarhaug Date: 04.2014 Dato: 04.2014 TØI report: 1308/2014 TØI rapport: 1308/2014 Pages 29 Sider 29 ISBN Electronic: 978-82-480-1511-6 ISBN Elektronisk: 978-82-480-1511-6 ISSN 0808-1190 ISSN 0808-1190 Financed by: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Finansieringskilde: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Institute of Transport Economics Transportøkonomisk institutt Project: 3888 - Taxi module Prosjekt: 3888 - Taxi module Quality manager: Frode Longva Kvalitetsansvarlig: Frode Longva Key words: Regulation Emneord: Drosje Taxi Regulering Summary: Sammendrag: Taxis are an instantly recognizable form of transport, existing in Drosjer finnes i alle byer og de er umiddelbart gjenkjennelige. almost every city in the world. Still the roles that are filled by Likevel er det stor variasjon i hva som ligger i begrepet drosje, og taxis varies much from city to city. Regulation of the taxi hvilken rolle drosjene har i det lokale transportsystemet.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Service Reform in Melbourne – the Last 5 Years Peter Parker
    Institute of Transport Studies, Monash University World Transit Research World Transit Research 9-1-2011 Bus service reform in Melbourne – the last 5 years Peter Parker Follow this and additional works at: http://www.worldtransitresearch.info/research Recommended Citation Parker, P. (2011). Bus service reform in Melbourne - the last 5 years. Conference paper delivered at the 34th Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF) Proceedings held on 28 - 30 September 2011 in Adelaide, Australia. This Conference Paper is brought to you for free and open access by World Transit Research. It has been accepted for inclusion in World Transit Research by an authorized administrator of World Transit Research. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Australasian Transport Research Forum 2011 28 – 30 September 2011, Adelaide, Australia Publications website: www.patrec.org/atrf.aspx Bus service reform in Melbourne – the last 5 years Peter Parker1 1 Metlink Melbourne, Level 8, 575 Bourke Street, Melbourne, 3000 Email for correspondence: [email protected] Abstract After fifteen years of little change, Melbourne’s bus services have altered significantly in the last five years. Underpinned by policy that supports greater public transport use, reform was driven by three major government programs; SmartBus, minimum standards upgrades and local area service reviews. This paper briefly compares the distribution of each service initiative. Minimum standards upgrades were most widespread, benefiting many middle and outer suburbs. Middle suburbs gained most from SmartBus, especially the City of Manningham where it operates on city as well as orbital routes. And the service reviews were most influential in fringe areas to the west, north and south east.
    [Show full text]
  • Transporting Melbourne's Recovery
    Transporting Melbourne’s Recovery Immediate policy actions to get Melbourne moving January 2021 Executive Summary The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted how Victorians make decisions for when, where and how they travel. Lockdown periods significantly reduced travel around metropolitan Melbourne and regional Victoria due to travel restrictions and work-from-home directives. As Victoria enters the recovery phase towards a COVID Normal, our research suggests that these travel patterns will shift again – bringing about new transport challenges. Prior to the pandemic, the transport network was struggling to meet demand with congested roads and crowded public transport services. The recovery phase adds additional complexity to managing the network, as the Victorian Government will need to balance competing objectives such as transmission risks, congestion and stimulating greater economic activity. Governments across the world are working rapidly to understand how to cater for the shifting transport demands of their cities – specifically, a disruption to entire transport systems that were not designed with such health and biosecurity challenges in mind. Infrastructure Victoria’s research is intended to assist the Victorian Government in making short-term policy decisions to balance the safety and performance of the transport system with economic recovery. The research is also designed to inform decision-making by industry and businesses as their workforces return to a COVID Normal. It focuses on how the transport network may handle returning demand and provides options to overcome the crowding and congestion effects, while also balancing the health risks posed by potential local transmission of the virus. Balancing these impacts is critical to fostering confidence in public transport travel, thereby underpinning and sustaining Melbourne’s economic recovery.
    [Show full text]
  • National Data on Transport Modal Shares for 131 Countries
    Article How Do People Move Around? National Data on Transport Modal Shares for 131 Countries Grigorios Fountas 1, Ya-Yen Sun 2 , Ortzi Akizu-Gardoki 3 and Francesco Pomponi 4,* 1 Transport Research Institute (TRI), School of Engineering & the Built Environment, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh EH10 5DT, UK; [email protected] 2 UQ Business School, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia; [email protected] 3 Faculty of Engineering of Bilbao, University of the Basque Country, 48013 Bilbao, Spain; [email protected] 4 Resource Efficient Built Environment Lab (REBEL), Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh EH10 5DT, UK * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-(0)-13-1455-3590 Received: 19 May 2020; Accepted: 16 June 2020; Published: 18 June 2020 Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic has brought global mobility into the spotlight, with well over 100 countries having instituted either a full or partial lockdown by April 2020. Reduced mobility, whilst causing social and economic impacts, can also be beneficial for the environment and future studies will surely quantify such environmental gains. However, accurate quantification is intimately linked to good quality data on transport modal shares, as passenger cars and public transport have significantly different emissions profiles. Herein, we compile a currently lacking dataset on global modal transport shares for 131 countries. Notably, these are the countries covered by the Google Community Mobility Reports (plus Russia and China for their global relevance), thus allowing for a smooth integration between our dataset and the rich information offered by the Google Community Mobility Reports, thus enabling analysis of global emissions reductions due to mobility restrictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Promoting Physical Activity and Active Living in Urban Environments
    PROMOTING PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AND ACTIVE LIVING IN URBAN ENVIRONMENTS LIVINGINURBANENVIRONMENTS ANDACTIVE ACTIVITY PHYSICAL PROMOTING The WHO Regional Offi ce for Europe THE SOLID The World Health Organization (WHO) is FACTS a specialized agency of the United Nations created in 1948 with the primary responsibility for international health People’s participation in physical activity is infl uenced by the built, natural matters and public and social environments in which people live as well as by personal health. The WHO Regional Offi ce for factors such as sex, age, ability, time and motivation. The way people Europe is one of six regional offi ces organize cities, design the urban environment and provide access to the throughout the world, each with its own natural environment can be an encouragement or a barrier to physical programme geared to the particular health activity and active living. Other barriers exist in the social environments conditions of the within which people work, learn, play and live. countries it serves. Physical activity is an essential component of any strategy that aims to Member States address the problems of sedentary living and obesity among children and Albania adults. Active living contributes to individual physical and mental health Andorra Armenia but also to social cohesion and community well-being. Opportunities for Austria being physically active are not limited to sports and organized recreation; Azerbaijan Belarus opportunities exist everywhere – where people live and work, in Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina neighbourhoods and in educational and health establishments. Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus The Healthy Cities and urban governance programme of the WHO Czech Republic Denmark Regional Offi ce for Europe has focused on how local governments can Estonia Finland implement healthy urban planning to generate environments that France promote opportunities for physical activity and active living.
    [Show full text]
  • 3718938-V8-AUG06 PC CITY of MELBOURNE TRANSPORT
    Page 7 of 185 Attachment 1 Agenda Item 5.1 Planning Committee 1 August 2006 City of Melbourne Transport Strategy 2020: Moving People & Freight July 2006 Page 8 of 185 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ..........................................................................................................................................................3 1. INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................5 VISION FOR AN INTEGRATED AND SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT SYSTEM ............................................... 5 WHY DO WE NEED AN INTEGRATED AND SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT SYSTEM?.................................. 6 THE AREAS FOR ACTION............................................................................................................................ 10 IMPLEMENTATION ....................................................................................................................................... 11 THE POLICY CONTEXT................................................................................................................................ 12 2. GETTING TO THE CITY ....................................................................................................................15 WHAT WE WANT FOR 2020: OUR VISION OF A SUSTAINABLE AND INTEGRATED TRANSPORT NETWORK..................................................................................................................................................... 15 METROPOLITAN VEHICLE ACCESS
    [Show full text]
  • 3.3 Current Situation and Key Issues of the Public Transport Sector in Gkma
    Final Report The Study on Greater Kampala Road Network and Transport Improvement in the Republic of Uganda November 2010 3.3 CURRENT SITUATION AND KEY ISSUES OF THE PUBLIC TRANSPORT SECTOR IN GKMA 3.3.1 OVERVIEW OF THE PUBLIC TRANSPORT The privately owned Uganda Transport Company (UTC) held the exclusive franchise for bus services in Kampala until its nationalization in 1972. At that time, its only competition came from shared taxis which are saloon or estate cars. Following its nationalization, UTC contracted and focused more closely on its long-distance services. As a result, the market for urban transport services in Kampala became open to private sector operators using small minibus vehicles. In 1994 a commercial vehicle distributor established City Link as a private-sector large bus operation with some 40 vehicles in service. However, UTODA was able to organize an effective competition to this initiative. City Link meanwhile did not succeed by operating similar to that of minibus services based on fill-and-run principle, rather than operating based on scheduled services. Thus, the company shortly collapsed. Feedback from these results indicates that although City Link was popular, its operations were too thinly spread over the network and were not able to provide a reliable service. Public transport passengers within Kampala have very limited choice such as minibus services or motorcycle services with the majority as minibus services locally called taxis. 3.3.2 TAXI/MINIBUS Main supply of public transport in Kampala is now by minibuses, which are known locally as taxi (photographs bellow). KCC estimated that in 2003, there were nearly 7,000 minibuses based in the GKMA.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating New Mobility Services in Urban Transport
    Integrating new mobility services in urban transport Executive summary New mobility services and business models are changing urban transport, affecting both the supply and demand sides of urban mobility market. App-based mobility services such as car and ride sharing and Mobility as a Service (MaaS) through single or integrated ticketing services, offer new possibilities to expand and complement existing mobility and can help to balance public and private transport in cities. Evidence1 shows that these developments can lead to a significant reduction of single occupancy private car use and an increase of public transport use, leading to a strong reduction in congestion, local air pollution, and CO2 emissions. These benefits will occur when more vehicles are shared and private car ownership is reduced. Under these conditions, new mobility can change the way people live in cities: an International Transport Forum study found that in Lisbon ridesharing services could make public transport more efficient and thus end congestion, reduce traffic emissions by one third, and decrease required parking space.2 This illustrates the magnitude of the change and the important benefits resulting in moving towards an increasing use of shared mobility, public transport and integrated use of various mobility services. Despite their long term potential, the growth and development of new mobility services are often hampered by existing market access restrictions (e.g. limits on number of new mobility services), operational requirements (e.g. excessive vehicle restrictions), and financial disincentives (e.g. pricing regulation). Companies attempting to offer mobility as a service or single ticketing systems also have to manage the expectations and different business models of transport operators that they want to include in the service.
    [Show full text]