DOCSLIB.ORG

The Effect of Transport Accessibility on the Social Inclusion of Wheelchair Users: a Mixed Method Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Effect of Transport Accessibility on the Social Inclusion of Wheelchair Users: a Mixed Method Analysis Social Inclusion (ISSN: 2183-2803) 2016, Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages 24-35 Doi: 10.17645/si.v4i3.484 Article The Effect of Transport Accessibility on the Social Inclusion of Wheelchair Users: A Mixed Method Analysis Raquel Velho 1,*, Catherine Holloway ², Andrew Symonds ³ and Brian Balmer 1 1 Department of Science and Technology Studies, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK; E-Mails: [email protected] (R.V.), [email protected] (B.B.) ² Department of Computer Science, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK; E-Mail: [email protected] ³ Institute of Orthopaedic and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University College London, Stanmore, HA7 4LP, UK; E-Mail: [email protected] * Corresponding author Submitted: 20 October 2015 | Accepted: 9 February 2016 | Published: 7 June 2016 Abstract In recent years the accessibility of London buses has improved with the introduction of ramps and wheelchair priority areas. These advances are meant to remove physical barriers to entering the bus, but new conflicts have arisen particu- larly over the physical space aboard. We aimed to research the barriers faced by wheelchair users in public transport using a mixed methods approach to establish the breadth of issues faced by wheelchair users. To this end we quantified the push-force used alight a bus and a study to understand the coping mechanisms used by people to propel up a ramp. This quantitative approach found push forces which resulted in a load of 2 to 3 times body weight being transferred through people’s shoulders, forces which can be directly linked to shoulder injury. This could disable the user further, preventing them from being able to push their wheelchair. Alongside the quantitative study, we conducted qualitative research comprising of a number of in-depth interviews with wheelchair users about the barriers they face in public transport. Our main claim, highlighted through this interdisciplinary collaboration, is that proposed ‘solutions’ to acces- sibility, such as ramps, often generate problems of their own. These barriers can affect the life of wheelchair users, im- pacting on their confidence and causing social isolation. These can be long-term in nature or immediate. Keywords accessibility; disability; interdisciplinarity; public transport; science and technology studies; Transport for London; wheelchair Issue This article is part of the issue “Transport Policy and Social Inclusion”, edited by Miriam Ricci, Graham Parkhurst and Juliet Jain (University of the West of England, UK). © 2016 by the authors; licensee Cogitatio (Lisbon, Portugal). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribu- tion 4.0 International License (CC BY). 1. Introduction With three adjectives, Peter painted a less than ideal im- age of London’s public transport from his perspective. A “If I were to ask you to describe transport accessi- 25-year-old lawyer who works and lives in Central Lon- bility for wheelchair users in London as it is today don, he carefully chose where to live in the European with three words, what are the three words you capital to ensure an easier commute, requiring only a would choose?” short underground journey on the famous Tube net- “Well-intentioned. Inadequate. Uninspiring.” (Peter) work. His is one of several stories and ways of talking about transport and its impact on people’s lives, particu- Social Inclusion, 2016, Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages 24-35 24 larly the influence that transport (in)accessibility might transport is not accessible then mobility can not happen, have on wheelchair users’ social inclusion. In this article, which in turn can isolate people from the economic, po- we want to consider transport and inclusion with wheel- litical and social life of the community (Kenyon, Lyons, & chair users’ accessibility to the network as the primary Rafferty, 2002). There are 1.2 million wheelchair users in focus by using two, quite different, disciplinary ap- England (National Health Services Modernisation Agen- proaches—sociology and engineering. The aim is to cy, 2004). Wheelchair users have specific access needs highlight how both approaches demonstrate, in different as most find gaps and steps difficult to overcome, there- ways, how solutions proposed to improve accessibility fore a ramp is needed to overcome the naturally occur- may also generate future problems for wheelchair users. ring gap between the footway and the bus. Specific to In 2005, the main transport authority in London, London, guidelines have been developed for accessible Transport for London, introduced low-floor buses with bus stop design, and accessible buses (Mayor of London, boarding ramps for wheelchair users. These buses 2006). A key guideline in this document is the need for a would eliminate some obvious physical obstacles wheelchair accessible space and an interface between (compared to the previous model of buses, the Route- the bus and footway which results in a ramp gradient of master, which had a step) and permit wheelchair users less that 12% (7 degrees). It is believed this gradient is a to board and alight buses, ensuring their inclusion to compromise between reducing the necessary push force one mode of the public transport network. However, needed to ascend or descend the ramp, and the re- as we will discuss below, this implementation was not quirements of the built environment. the end of accessibility problems as wheelchair users Accessibility is a term which means different things can also face other issues. Indeed, with wheelchair us- to different audiences, generally due to the scale over ers being able to physically use the bus, other conflicts which it is being measured. At a micro-level accessibility began to appear generated by these improvements. can be measured using the Capability Model (CM), This research was initially developed as a pilot study which focuses on measuring the Provided Capabilities of in 2013 as a collaboration between the UCL depart- the person when undertaking a task and comparing ments of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering these to the Required Capabilities of the task (Holloway and of Science and Technology Studies. The intention & Tyler, 2013). In this respect the CM looks to under- was to think about accessibility from both perspectives, stand accessibility by understanding the interactions be- quantitative and qualitative, with the aim of seeing tween the person and the environment. Holloway and whether these two ostensibly incommensurable disci- Tyler explore the CM with regards to attendant wheel- plines could inform each other and provide new insights chair propulsion noting that when an assistive technolo- into transport accessibility for wheelchair users. The aim gy such as a wheelchair is used by someone this then of this article is to explore the initial results of this inter- enhances their provided capability set (for most tasks). disciplinary collaboration. To begin, we will briefly de- In a similar manner the bus ramp can be assumed to re- scribe the policies and regulations which frame transport duce the required capabilities thereby increasing acces- accessibility in the UK and, more specifically, London. sibility. The CM looks to address how people accomplish We will then address the question of accessibility with a these tasks, these ‘coping strategies’ can range from mixed methods approach, developed below in two sepa- simply avoiding an activity or adapting the movement rate sections: the first offers a quantitative analysis from required to complete the task. The engineering compo- an engineering and biomechanics perspective. The sec- nent in our research uses the Capability Model as its ond section takes on a qualitative approach, based on framework to discuss the difficulties wheelchair users the field of Science and Technology Studies. In the last have while boarding and alighting a bus. It uses peak and section we ask what new insights were acquired through average tangential force when pushing up a standard the collaboration of engineers and social scientists, and bus ramp to quantify the provided capability. A model of discuss the rigidity of the transport system in London as how a person pushes is developed and the forces occur- it affects wheelchair passengers. ring at the shoulder are used as a secondary measure of provided capability, while the muscle activity patterns of 2. Background pushing are used to describe the coping strategies. On the other hand, accessibility can also be under- Public transport is incredibly important to disabled peo- stood from a qualitative perspective as a potential fac- ple in Great Britain. In a recent report analysing second- tor for inclusion. Here, we need to listen to people’s ary data by Jolly, Priestley and Matthews (2006) it was own experiences of the public transport system to found disabled people attach a greater importance to grasp the barriers they face. In our research, the social and almost half are totally reliant on public transport for sciences approach based its framework on the field of each journey they take. The main reason for public Science and Technology Studies, which has built up a transport reliance is a lack of access to a car. However, substantial body of literature that analyses scientific disabled people travel a third less than the general pub- processes and technological innovation not as ‘things in lic (Miller, Gillinson, & Huber, 2006). When public themselves’ but as institutions comprised of both things Social Inclusion, 2016, Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages 24-35 25 and people. As such, any new or changing technology Accessibility Movement Environment Laboratory must be considered alongside the variety of users, pro- (PAMELA) where they would engage in two activities. ducers, maintainers, regulators and other groups which The first consisted of asking participants to board and come into being or change with the technology itself alight a bus with the gradient set to 7 degrees. The ex- (Bijker, 1997; MacKenzie & Wajcman, 1985).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Non-Motorized Vehicles in Asia: Lessons for Sustainable Transport Planning and Policy
    Non-Motorized Vehicles in Asia: Lessons for Sustainable Transport Planning and Policy by Michael Replogle Abstract This paper provides an overview of the current use of non-motorized vehicles (NMVs) in Asian cities, the characteristics of NMVs and facilities that serve them, and policies that influence their use. The paper identifies conditions under which NMV use should be encouraged for urban transport, obstacles to the development of NMVs, and identifies desirable steps that might be taken to develop a Non-Motorized Transport Strategy for a city or region, in Asia and other parts of the world. NMVs offer low cost private transport, emit no pollution, use renewable energy, emphasize use of labor rather than capital for mobility, and are well suited for short trips in most cities regardless of income, offering an alternative to motorized transport for many short trips. Thus, they are appropriate elements in strategies dealing with poverty alleviation, air pollution, management of traffic problems and motorization, and the social and economic dimensions of structural adjustment. NMVs have a most important role to play as a complementary mode to public transportation. Cities in Asia exhibit widely varying modal mixes. NMVs -- bicycles, cycle-rickshaws, and carts -- now play a vital role in urban transport in much of Asia. NMVs account for 25 to 80 percent of vehicle trips in many Asian cities, more than anywhere else in the world. Ownership of all vehicles, including NMVs, is growing rapidly throughout Asia as incomes increase. However, the future of NMVs in many Asian cities is threatened by growing motorization, loss of street space for safe NMV use, and changes in urban form prompted by motorization.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxis As Urban Transport
    TØI report 1308/2014 Jørgen Aarhaug Taxis as urban transport TØI Report 1308/2014 Taxis as urban transport Jørgen Aarhaug This report is covered by the terms and conditions specified by the Norwegian Copyright Act. Contents of the report may be used for referencing or as a source of information. Quotations or references must be attributed to the Institute of Transport Economics (TØI) as the source with specific mention made to the author and report number. For other use, advance permission must be provided by TØI. ISSN 0808-1190 ISBN 978-82-480-1511-6 Electronic version Oslo, mars 2014 Title: Taxis as urban transport Tittel: Drosjer som del av bytransporttilbudet Author(s): Jørgen Aarhaug Forfattere: Jørgen Aarhaug Date: 04.2014 Dato: 04.2014 TØI report: 1308/2014 TØI rapport: 1308/2014 Pages 29 Sider 29 ISBN Electronic: 978-82-480-1511-6 ISBN Elektronisk: 978-82-480-1511-6 ISSN 0808-1190 ISSN 0808-1190 Financed by: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Finansieringskilde: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Institute of Transport Economics Transportøkonomisk institutt Project: 3888 - Taxi module Prosjekt: 3888 - Taxi module Quality manager: Frode Longva Kvalitetsansvarlig: Frode Longva Key words: Regulation Emneord: Drosje Taxi Regulering Summary: Sammendrag: Taxis are an instantly recognizable form of transport, existing in Drosjer finnes i alle byer og de er umiddelbart gjenkjennelige. almost every city in the world. Still the roles that are filled by Likevel er det stor variasjon i hva som ligger i begrepet drosje, og taxis varies much from city to city. Regulation of the taxi hvilken rolle drosjene har i det lokale transportsystemet.
    [Show full text]
  • National Data on Transport Modal Shares for 131 Countries
    Article How Do People Move Around? National Data on Transport Modal Shares for 131 Countries Grigorios Fountas 1, Ya-Yen Sun 2 , Ortzi Akizu-Gardoki 3 and Francesco Pomponi 4,* 1 Transport Research Institute (TRI), School of Engineering & the Built Environment, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh EH10 5DT, UK; [email protected] 2 UQ Business School, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia; [email protected] 3 Faculty of Engineering of Bilbao, University of the Basque Country, 48013 Bilbao, Spain; [email protected] 4 Resource Efficient Built Environment Lab (REBEL), Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh EH10 5DT, UK * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-(0)-13-1455-3590 Received: 19 May 2020; Accepted: 16 June 2020; Published: 18 June 2020 Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic has brought global mobility into the spotlight, with well over 100 countries having instituted either a full or partial lockdown by April 2020. Reduced mobility, whilst causing social and economic impacts, can also be beneficial for the environment and future studies will surely quantify such environmental gains. However, accurate quantification is intimately linked to good quality data on transport modal shares, as passenger cars and public transport have significantly different emissions profiles. Herein, we compile a currently lacking dataset on global modal transport shares for 131 countries. Notably, these are the countries covered by the Google Community Mobility Reports (plus Russia and China for their global relevance), thus allowing for a smooth integration between our dataset and the rich information offered by the Google Community Mobility Reports, thus enabling analysis of global emissions reductions due to mobility restrictions.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.3 Current Situation and Key Issues of the Public Transport Sector in Gkma
    Final Report The Study on Greater Kampala Road Network and Transport Improvement in the Republic of Uganda November 2010 3.3 CURRENT SITUATION AND KEY ISSUES OF THE PUBLIC TRANSPORT SECTOR IN GKMA 3.3.1 OVERVIEW OF THE PUBLIC TRANSPORT The privately owned Uganda Transport Company (UTC) held the exclusive franchise for bus services in Kampala until its nationalization in 1972. At that time, its only competition came from shared taxis which are saloon or estate cars. Following its nationalization, UTC contracted and focused more closely on its long-distance services. As a result, the market for urban transport services in Kampala became open to private sector operators using small minibus vehicles. In 1994 a commercial vehicle distributor established City Link as a private-sector large bus operation with some 40 vehicles in service. However, UTODA was able to organize an effective competition to this initiative. City Link meanwhile did not succeed by operating similar to that of minibus services based on fill-and-run principle, rather than operating based on scheduled services. Thus, the company shortly collapsed. Feedback from these results indicates that although City Link was popular, its operations were too thinly spread over the network and were not able to provide a reliable service. Public transport passengers within Kampala have very limited choice such as minibus services or motorcycle services with the majority as minibus services locally called taxis. 3.3.2 TAXI/MINIBUS Main supply of public transport in Kampala is now by minibuses, which are known locally as taxi (photographs bellow). KCC estimated that in 2003, there were nearly 7,000 minibuses based in the GKMA.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating New Mobility Services in Urban Transport
    Integrating new mobility services in urban transport Executive summary New mobility services and business models are changing urban transport, affecting both the supply and demand sides of urban mobility market. App-based mobility services such as car and ride sharing and Mobility as a Service (MaaS) through single or integrated ticketing services, offer new possibilities to expand and complement existing mobility and can help to balance public and private transport in cities. Evidence1 shows that these developments can lead to a significant reduction of single occupancy private car use and an increase of public transport use, leading to a strong reduction in congestion, local air pollution, and CO2 emissions. These benefits will occur when more vehicles are shared and private car ownership is reduced. Under these conditions, new mobility can change the way people live in cities: an International Transport Forum study found that in Lisbon ridesharing services could make public transport more efficient and thus end congestion, reduce traffic emissions by one third, and decrease required parking space.2 This illustrates the magnitude of the change and the important benefits resulting in moving towards an increasing use of shared mobility, public transport and integrated use of various mobility services. Despite their long term potential, the growth and development of new mobility services are often hampered by existing market access restrictions (e.g. limits on number of new mobility services), operational requirements (e.g. excessive vehicle restrictions), and financial disincentives (e.g. pricing regulation). Companies attempting to offer mobility as a service or single ticketing systems also have to manage the expectations and different business models of transport operators that they want to include in the service.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sixth Carbon Budget Surface Transport
    The Sixth Carbon Budget Surface Transport 1 This document contains a summary of content for the surface transport sector from the CCC’s Sixth Carbon Budget Advice, Methodology and Policy reports. 2 The Committee is advising that the UK set its Sixth Carbon Budget (i.e. the legal limit for UK net emissions of greenhouse gases over the years 2033-37) to require a reduction in UK emissions of 78% by 2035 relative to 1990, a 63% reduction from 2019. This will be a world-leading commitment, placing the UK decisively on the path to Net Zero by 2050 at the latest, with a trajectory that is consistent with the Paris Agreement. Our advice on the Sixth Carbon Budget, including emissions pathways, details on our analytical approach and policy recommendations for the surface transport sector, is presented across three CCC reports, an accompanying dataset and supporting evidence: • An Advice report: The Sixth Carbon Budget – The UK’s path to Net Zero, setting out our recommendations on the Sixth Carbon Budget (2033-37) and the UK’s Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) under the Paris Agreement. This report also presents the overall emissions pathways for the UK and the Devolved Administrations and for each sector of emissions, as well as analysis of the costs, benefits and wider impacts of our recommended pathway, and considerations relating to climate science and international progress towards the Paris Agreement. Section 1 of Chapter 3 contains an overview of the emissions pathways for the surface transport sector. • A Methodology Report: The Sixth Carbon Budget – Methodology Report, setting out the approach and assumptions used to inform our advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming Private and Public Urban Transport Pricing Discussion Paper
    CPB Corporate Partnership Board Reforming Private and Public Urban Transport Pricing 170 Roundtable Discussion Paper Stef Proost Catholic University of Leuven CPB Corporate Partnership Board Reforming Private and Public Urban Transport Pricing 170 Roundtable Discussion Paper Stef Proost Catholic University of Leuven The International Transport Forum The International Transport Forum is an intergovernmental organisation with 59 member countries. It acts as a think tank for transport policy and organises the Annual Summit of transport ministers. ITF is the only global body that covers all transport modes. The ITF is politically autonomous and administratively integrated with the OECD. The ITF works for transport policies that improve peoples’ lives. Our mission is to foster a deeper understanding of the role of transport in economic growth, environmental sustainability and social inclusion and to raise the public profile of transport policy. The ITF organises global dialogue for better transport. We act as a platform for discussion and pre- negotiation of policy issues across all transport modes. We analyse trends, share knowledge and promote exchange among transport decision-makers and civil society. The ITF’s Annual Summit is the world’s largest gathering of transport ministers and the leading global platform for dialogue on transport policy. The Members of the Forum are: Albania, Armenia, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China (People’s Republic of), Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Korea, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, Republic of Moldova, Montenegro, Morocco, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom and the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Travel Time of Various Transportation Systems in Urban Context
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Transportation Research Procedia 00 (2016) 000–000 www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia International Scientific Conference on Mobility and Transport Urban Mobility – Shaping the Future Together mobil.TUM 2018, 13-14 June 2018, Munich, Germany Analysis of the Travel Time of Various Transportation Systems in Urban Context Kathrin Viergutza*, Daniel Krajzewiczb aInstitute of Transportation Systems, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Lilienthalplatz 7, 38108 Braunschweig, Germany bInstitute of Transportation Research, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Rutherfordstraße 2 12489 Berlin, Germany © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of mobil.TUM 2018. Keywords: Travel Time; Ridepooling; Mobility on Demand 1. Abstract What’s the maximum detour for ride pooling that is accepted from the passengers’ point of view? We address this question by determining the accepted detour of conventional public line transport, which is being accepted by its passengers. This is done using the Google Maps Routing application programming interface (API) for analyzing the travel times of different means of transport in 13 German cities. From the identified travel time ratios of public transport and motorized individual transport conclusions are drawn about the maximum reasonable detour when using ride pooling. * Corresponding author. Tel.: +49 531 295-2286 E-mail address: [email protected] 2214-241X © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of mobil.TUM 2018. 2 Kathrin Viergutz, Daniel Krajzewicz / Transportation Research Procedia 00 (2018) 000–000 2. Introduction Conventional public transportation systems are based on static timetables that describe at what time each station is approached by public transport vehicles and the vehicles follow fixed routes.
    [Show full text]
  • Reisebeschreibung Biking Kilimanjaro Our Experience
    Die Radreisen-Datenbank Reisebeschreibung http://www.fahrradreisen.de Biking Kilimanjaro Our experience your advantage - Reach the summit Highlights: Cycling on Mt Kilimanjaro Whether you actually reach the summit depends almost exclusively upon one factor: Your acclimatization. Our whole itinerary is geared towards one single day, that is to say, summit day. A lot of the time we will have to push the bikes. Riding them would theoretically be possible but it would use far too much energy. We need to save most of this for the day of the summit...when we will have a climb of 1200m. There is more than enough time for this, as we will set off shortly after midnight. As a reward for reaching the summit we have a compulsory souvenir photo in store for you as well as a nearly 5000m descent. You´re guaranteed to be talking about this for a long time afterwards. The Kilema Mountain bike trail runs parallel with the Marangu route. The Kilema route is mainly used as an access road by vehicles to bring supplies to the Horombo hut and to evacuate medical emergencies from Horombo hut. The route from Kilema gate to Horombo hut is a 4 x 4 gravel road, which is usually in a fair condition. The Kilema route with first night at the Kilema camp option, is shorter, less strenuous and involves more mountain biking, compared to the Kilema route option with the first night at Mandara hut. However it is more expensive, as the first night is spend camping in tents and the rest of the nights are spend in the Marangu route´s A-frame huts.
    [Show full text]
  • QUT Digital Repository
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Queensland University of Technology ePrints Archive QUT Digital Repository: http://eprints.qut.edu.au/ Rahman, Mamun M. and D'Este, Glen and Bunker, Jonathan M. (2009) Is there a future for non-motorized public transport in Asia? In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies (EASTS) , 16 - 19 November 2009, Surabaya, Indonesia. © Copyright 2009 (please consult author) Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol.7, 2009 Is There a Future for Non-Motorized Public Transport in Asia? Mamun Muntasir RAHMAN Glen D’ESTE PhD Student Professor School of Urban Development School of Urban Development Queensland University of Technology, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia. Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia. Fax: +61-7-3138 1170 Fax: +61-7-3138 1170 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Jonathan BUNKER Senior Lecturer School of Urban Development Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia. Fax: +61-7-3138 1170 Email: [email protected] Abstract: Non-motorized public transport (NMPT), especially three-wheeler cycle rickshaws, has a long history in East Asia; and has long been a major transport planning issue. Policy measures to restrict or eliminate NMPT have already been implemented in many developing cities with mixed success. However given the economic, social and cultural significance of NMPT, its environmental benefits, and the magnitude of its role in sustaining the mobility needs of citizens, it is timely to reconsider the future role of NMPT.
    [Show full text]
  • Measure Evaluation Results
    Measure Evaluation Results GDA 4.3 Mobility Management – Mobility Week Ewa Zabłocka-Krasowska (Pomeranian Evaluation Society) Łukasz Kłos (City of Gdańsk) Date: February 2013 Measure title: Mobility Management – Mobility Week City: Gdansk Project: MIMOSA Measure number: 4.3 Executive Summary The measure ´Mobility Management - Mobility Week´ aimed at the development of a long- term communication concept to raise citizens´ awareness on alternatives for a sustainable transport system in Gdansk. The long-term objective is to encourage citizens, especially car owners, to shift towards sustainable transport modes. Activities undertaken within the framework of the measure relied on the use of social communication in the area of advertising, information and promotion. The main activity of the measure is the organisation of specific activities during the well-established European Week of Sustainable Transport campaign taking place yearly in Gdansk. An external positive outcome of this measure was to make visible the interaction between the several measures implemented in the frame of MIMOSA project and highlight the comprehensive vision for a sustainable mobility management initiated by the municipality of Gdansk. The events and activities of this measure were strongly related to the activities organized in the frame of the measure GDA 4.1 ´Mobility Management. Marketing Tram´ and the measure GDA 6.1 ´New Cycles´ which shared the same high level objective to “increase modal split towards sustainable modes”. The measure was realized in the following stages: Stage 1: European Car Free Days (2010 - 2012) Since 2010, a yearly Car Free Day was organized by public transport organizations supported by the MIMOSA team during which the city centre was closed to private cars and financial incentives were given to car owners to take public transport systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Mountain Biking in Queensland: Regional Solutions
    Developing Mountain Biking in Queensland: Regional Solutions Developing Mountain Biking in Queensland: Regional Solutions 17 December 2014 Lead Author Donna Little Way to Be – waytobe.com.au Contributing Authors Gillian Duncan Gap Creek Trails Alliance (GCTA) Leasie Felderhof Tablelands Integrated Mountain Bike Alliance (TIMBA) Rob Macdonald Sunshine Coast Trails Alliance (SCTA) Murray Stewart Queensland Outdoor Recreation Federation (QORF) Howard Taylor City of Gold Coast (CoGC) Andrew Wilson South East Queensland Trails Alliance (SEQTA) While reasonable care has been taken in preparing this document, the authors provide no warranties and make no representations that the information contained in the document is correct, complete, or reliable. The authors expressly disclaim liability for any loss, however caused, whether due to negligence or otherwise arising from the use of or reliance on the information contained in this document by any person. i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Overview ......................................................................................................................... iii 2.1 What is mountain biking? .............................................................................................. 2 2.2 Background to proposal ................................................................................................ 2 2.3 The vision for MTB in Queensland ............................................................................... 3 2.4 Mountain biking in Queensland ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]