The International Tropical Timber Organization
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
INTERNATIONAL TROPICAL TIMBER ORGANIZATION ITTO PRE-PROECT PROPOSAL INTITULÉ: SUPPORT TO THE CREATION OF GREEN BELTS AROUND THE WAZA, BENOUÉ, FARO AND BOUBA NDJIDDA NATIONAL PARKS SERIAL NUMBER PPD 178/14 Rev.2 (F) COMMITTEE REFORESTATION AND FOREST MANAGEMENT SUBMITTED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF CAMEROON ORIGINAL LANGUAGE FRENCH SUMMARY The plant formations of the Waza, Faro, Benue and Bouba Ndjidda National Parks are subject to multiple threats that jeopardize their existence. These threats stem from the way subsistence needs of local communities are addressed including their needs for fuel wood and wood material for rural infrastructure and fences, and this situation is maintained through a lack of local initiatives to rehabilitate the degrading plant cover. National Parks are the least degraded areas in the different regions. To reduce the rate of degradation of the plant cover and improve the supply of fuel wood and construction wood in the areas surrounding these parks, it is appropriate to launch a project to establish green belts around these national parks. However, the lack of information required for setting up such project calls for the prior formulation of a pre- project whose implementation will consist in the conduct of baseline studies and the formulation of a full project proposal. EXECUTING AGENCY DIRECTORATE OF WILDLIFE AND CONSERVATION AREAS (DFAP) /MINFOF COLLABORATING AGENCY --- DURATION 6 MONTHS APPROXIMATE STARTING DATE TO BE DECIDED BUDGET AND FUNDING Source Contribution Local currency SOURCES : in US$ equivalent ITTO $ 86,240 Govn’t of Cameroon $ 13,650 TOTAL $ 99,890 Table of Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................................................. 1 PART 1. PRE-PROJECT CONTEXT ....................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 ORIGIN AND JUSTIFICATION ........................................................................................................................ 2 1.2 RELEVANCE ................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.2.1 Conformity with ITTO objectives and priorities ........................................................................... 3 1.2.2 Relevance to the policies of the submitting country ..................................................................... 4 PART 2. PRE-PROJECT JUSTIFICATION ............................................................................................................ 6 2.1. OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................................................ 6 2.1.1. Development objective ................................................................................................................... 6 2.1.2. Specific objective ........................................................................................................................... 6 2.2. PRELIMINARY PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION .................................................................................................. 6 PART 3. PRE-PROJECT INTERVENTIONS ......................................................................................................... 8 3.1. OUTPUTS ..................................................................................................................................................... 8 3.2. ACTIVITIES, INPUTS AND UNIT COSTS ......................................................................................................... 8 3.3. APPROACHES AND METHODS ...................................................................................................................... 8 3.4. WORK PLAN.............................................................................................................................................. 10 3.5. BUDGET .................................................................................................................................................... 11 PART 4. IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS ............................................................................................ 18 4.1. EXECUTING AGENCY AND ORGANIZATIONAL SET-UP ............................................................................... 18 4.2. PRE-PROJECT MANAGEMENT .................................................................................................................... 18 4.3. MONITORING AND REPORTING ................................................................................................................. 18 ANNEX 1. PROFILE OF THE EXECUTING AGENCY .............................................................................. 19 ANNEX 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE OF THE KEY EXPERTS MADE AVAILABLE BY THE EXECUTING AGENCY .................................................................................................................. 20 ANNEX 3. TERMS OF REFERENCE OF PERSONNEL AND CONSULTANTS WHOSE SALARIES AND PROFESSIONAL FEES WILL BE FINANCED BY THE ITTO .............. 24 ANNEX 4. RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE ITTO EXPERT PANEL AND RESULTING AMENDMENTS ............................................................................................................................... 29 LIST OF ACRONYMS COPEMP : Standing Committee for the Development, Finalization and Validation of Structuring Projects to Leverage New Funding for the Forest and Wildlife Sub-sector CRRVS : Reforestation, Regeneration and Forestry Extension Unit DFAP : Directorate of Wildlife and Protected Areas ITTA : International Tropical Timber Agreement ITTO : International Tropical Timber Organization IUCN : International Union for the Conservation of Nature MINFOF : Ministry of Forests and Wildlife NGO : Non-Governmental Organization NP : National Park OD : Development Objective OS : Specific Objective WCS: Wildlife Conservation Society WWF: World Wild Funds for Nature - 1 - PART 1. PRE-PROJECT CONTEXT 1.1 Origin and justification Since the 1930s, Cameroon has created many protected areas to better conserve its biodiversity. Today, there are 31 protected areas having various statutes and covering around 19.2% of the total country area. This rich heritage is the result of the strengthening of the legal and institutional framework, taking into consideration national and international laws. The initiatives undertaken in the context of the conservation of its biodiversity have been significant. They have resulted in the creation of 18 national parks, 06 wildlife reserves, 04 sanctuaries including one flora sanctuary, 03 zoos and botanical gardens. Added to this are transboundary initiatives including the Trinational Sangha Park (agreement between the Lobéké National Park in Cameroon, the Dzanga Sangha National Park in CAR and the Nouabale-doki Park in Congo); the TRIDOM initiative (Agreement covering the Dja conservation area in Cameroon, the Odzala C.A. in Congo and the Minkébé C.A. in Congo); the Agreement covering the Serra Oura - Bouba Djidda areas (Chad-Cameroon), ongoing initiatives between Cameroon and Nigeria concerning conservation areas (the Takamanda National Park in Cameroon and the Cross River National Park in Nigeria; the Faro National Park Cameroon, the Gachaka Goumti National Park in Nigeria, the Waza National Park in Cameroon, Lake Chad Basin National Park in Nigeria, and finally the Rio Campo Reserve in Equatorial Guinea and the Campo Ma'an National Park in Cameroon. Protected areas of Cameroon receive the support of several international organizations such as IUCN (Waza NP), WWF has been involved in a conservation project involving the Benue, Faro and Bouba Djidda National Parks, which is funded by the Global Environment Facility (GEF). To date, an agreement to support the management of the Benue National Park is being finalized between WWF and MINFOF. In addition, the WCS had just undertaken an overview of the Bouba Djidda N.P. to conduct wildlife inventories and provide an outlook on the residual population of elephants after the slaughter that had been perpetrated. In addition, this organization has been adequately involved in the Bouba Djidda-Sena Oura cross-border agreement. While the above mentioned efforts were conducted to promote conservation, the State of Cameroon developed mitigation measures to reduce the damage caused by the use of wood resources to produce the fuelwood needed in this part of the country by initiating the fuelwood project to supply the towns of Maroua and Garoua. The conservation areas of Cameroon (especially the North) face an increasing deterioration trend caused by the increase in population and the search for economic opportunities that leads the communities to engage in gold mining activities, cattle raising, firewood and timber harvesting beyond their community lands. Concerning the conservation areas of Benue, Bouba Djidda, Faro and Waza in particular, which still have a high biodiversity, they are used by local communities as source of fodder and fuelwood, as these commodities are becoming increasingly rare on village community lands. In addition, earlier forest planting policies (Green Sahel project) were never focused on areas situated on the periphery of these conservation areas. The consequence of this has been the loss of wildlife habitat, the loss of species including the black rhino, the African Wild Dog etc. To remedy this situation, it is wise