DOCSLIB.ORG

Other Large Mammals and Human Activities in Waza National Park, Cameroon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Other Large Mammals and Human Activities in Waza National Park, Cameroon African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Vol. 4(6), pp. 401-411, June, 2010 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJEST DOI: 10.5897/AJEST09.158 ISSN 1991-637X ©2010 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper Aerial survey of Elephants (Loxodonta africana africana), other large mammals and human activities in Waza National Park, Cameroon Désiré Foguekem¹ ²*, Martin Ngankam Tchamba¹, Patrick Omondi³ 1WWF Cameroon Program Office, P.O. Box 6776, Yaoundé, Cameroon. 2Department of Animal Biology Faculty of science, University of Yaounde 1, P.O. Box 812 Yaoundé, Cameroon. 3Kenya wildlife Service, P.O. Box 40241, Nairobi, Kenya. Accepted 18 March, 2010 Total aerial count of elephants, other large mammals and human activities in Waza National Park was conducted between 21st and 23rd February 2007. Total counts of elephants and other wildlife species were done and livestock numbers were estimated. A Cessna 206 Stationair six-seater aircraft fitted with GPS was used in navigation, recording survey paths and waypoints. A total of three different herds of 180 and 66 in the park along with a further 250 migrating elephant population towards Kalamaloue National Park were counted. The herds in the park were aggregated around central part of the park along watering point. The consideration of the number of the migrating herd then put the total Waza ecosystem elephant population at 496 individuals. The total number of carcasses recorded was 7 giving a carcass ratio of 2.85%. About 21,002 heads of livestock and over 50 farmlands and human settlement were estimated in the zone abutting the park. This signifies a high level of human pressures at the periphery and thus a high potential for loss of range for the elephants and illegal killing. Key words: Aerial count, elephant, large mammals, human activity, Waza National Park. INTRODUCTION Elephants in Cameroon occur in three distinct bio-geo- the deforestation of the Mandelia Faunal Reserve (Fry, graphical regions, with the Savannah elephants occurring 1970). Yet, there are little accurate estimates of elephant in the Northern Savannah ranges in the Sahelian and populations in the Waza National Park. The lack of Sudanian regions and forest elephants in the Southern accurate information on elephant population is cause for forested area (Tchamba et al., 1997). In 1936, the concern for conservation and management of this northern savanna population was estimated at no more species as in most cases elephants leave protected than 200 individuals, while the Southern forested zone areas where they are relatively protected and roam into was thought to hold between 9,000 and 10, 000 farmland, hunting zones or logging concessions where elephants (Jeannin, 1936). Between the 1940s and the they become very vulnerable to poaching. Elephants 1960s, populations in the Northern savanna reportedly could be used as a flagship species in developing doubled and by 1971, increasing elephant numbers were management decision in and outside protected areas if already cause of concern as elephants were destroying numbers and distribution are well determined. This can Acacia tree woodland in Waza National Park (Corfield only be done through population estimates over time as a and Hamilton, 1971). Most of the increase was asso- means of detecting changes in population number (Craig, ciated to the immigration into Northern Cameroon from 2002). In order that this be done as effectively as possi- Chad, probably resulting from disturbances there such as ble, it is necessary to use method, which is efficient in producing accurate and precise results, which remain comparable over time. Many attempts to estimate elephant population size in *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]. Tel: (237) the Waza National Park had been done. Esser and Van 74179235 or (237) 99852878. Fax: (237) 22214240. Laveieren (1979) estimated 478 elephants; Eijs and 402 Afr. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. Ekobo (1987); Steehouwer and Kouahoue (1989) esti- with Sclerocarya birrea tree savanna, Combretum and Terminalia mated 750 elephants within the Park. An aerial sample shrubs and stands of Hyphaena thebaica; Anogeissus leiocarpus woodland on sandy soil. Lannea humilis open grass savanna with count conducted in the Waza – Logone ecosystem in short annual grasses, sparse trees and stands of Mitragymna 1991 gave an estimate of 1,100 elephants (Tchamba and innermis forming small islands around temporary waterholes. The Elkan, 1995). No aerial total count has previously been Acacia seyal tree savanna on black clay soils which are saturated conducted in the area and, given the disparities in with water in the rainy season. The latter vegetation type is slowly counting methods and the growing length of time since spreading as the area gradually dries out. The Yaéré floodplains is populated with perennial grasses such as Vetiveria nigitana, Oriza the last systematic survey in 1991, it was important to get longistaminata, Echinocloa pyramidalis, E. stagnina and some her- an up to date population estimate. Waza National Park is baceous legumes including Sesbania pachycarpa. Water continues one of the Cameroon’s MIKE (monitoring of illegal killing to be one of the most serious problems for Waza. Recently, impor- of elephant) sites and is believed to hold the largest tant dry season waterholes have been created and managed in the elephant population in Northern Cameroon with high con- floodplain zone. centration of other large mammals, which makes Waza the focus of considerable conservation interest in METHODS Cameroon. Information on elephant numbers and range is important for effective conservation and management Choice of the study design of Africa’s elephants. Since the 1991 survey, information on elephant population size comes from ground counts of Several survey methods are used to census animals in Africa. Foot large mammals that, staff and students of the college of count for small and accessible area, which shows little bias when carefully designed and carried out (Burnham et al., 1980). Vehicle wildlife management of Garoua and the Park manager counts are practicable and give excellent and consistent results in occasionally carried out. Moreover, only small areas of small to medium sized areas. Its use is only limited with the the park surface can be sampled from the ground, con- available road system and may be of poor accuracy for species with sequently, most of the population estimate of elephants a clumped distribution (Jachmann, 1991). The dropping count has been inaccurate. We hypothesized that the elephant method is widely used to estimate elephant densities (Barnes and Jensen, 1987; Fay, 1991). It provides relatively good results for its population in the Waza National Park may be declining cost (Jachmann, 1991), but there are several potential sources of as a result of poaching and illegal activities in the park. error related to deriving the index of abundance and turning this Therefore, the 2007 total aerial count of Waza National index into an estimate of elephant numbers (Barnes, 1993; Park was undertaken with the aim to determine the cur- Tchamba, 1992). rent baseline status of Waza’s elephant population and In the savannah ecosystem, direct aerial count is the recom- map out the threats to this Northern population and their mended method, which has proven its effectiveness for quite long- time ago. It is widely used in South, East and West Africa (Bouché distribution. et al. 2003; Douglas-Hamilton, 1996). Reliable and consistent The following specific questions were addressed: (1) results can be obtained so long as some straightforward precau- What is the current elephant population size and distribu- tions are taken. It covers large area quickly and economically and is tion? (2) What is the number and distribution of elephant the only method for censuring in areas where access on the ground carcasses? (3) What is the distribution and numbers of is difficult or impossible. Its use becomes limited when the other species such as Giraffes, roan antelopes and live- vegetation is so thick that the animals cannot be seen from the air, or the animals concerned are too small (Craig, 1993). stock? And (4) what is the incidences of human activities There are several aerial survey methods, each appropriate to a that may be threatening elephants through protected area different situation. The methods are described well elsewhere encroachment? (Norton-Griffiths, 1978; Gasaway et al. 1986; Craig, 1993; Mbungwa, 1996; Douglas-Hamilton, 1996; Jachmann, 2001). According to Craig (2002) the choice of methods affect accuracy, MATERIALS AND METHOD precision and efficiency, although differing circumstances may demand different choices and one survey may even be made up of Study area areas surveyed by different methods. There are four different approaches: (1) Aerial distance counts require more equipment, Waza national park (Figure 1) is located near Lake Chad in the preparation and analysis than, (2) transect sample count, but may department of Logone and Chari, Northern Province of Cameroon add both precision and accuracy. However, the degree of improve- and lies between 11º00’-11º30’N and 14º30’-14º75’E. It covers an ment is not known and may be slight for elephants, which does not area of approximately 170 000 ha with an average altitude of 300 – justify the investment of using it (Craig, 2002). (3) Total counts are 320 m, rising to 500 m on the rocky outcrops around Waza village. the most precise and accurate, as long as search-rate standard are The park lies in the Chad depression in an area of low relief with no adhered to. However, there are seldom the resources to carry them permanent rivers. Soils are mainly ferruginous tropical with various out and they should only be considered when the survey area is catenas, hydromorphic soils and vertisols. The climate of the region less than 100 km². Transect sample counts are recommended is semi-arid, with a dry season extending from October to May.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aerial Surveys of Wildlife and Human Activity Across the Bouba N'djida
    Aerial Surveys of Wildlife and Human Activity Across the Bouba N’djida - Sena Oura - Benoue - Faro Landscape Northern Cameroon and Southwestern Chad April - May 2015 Paul Elkan, Roger Fotso, Chris Hamley, Soqui Mendiguetti, Paul Bour, Vailia Nguertou Alexandre, Iyah Ndjidda Emmanuel, Mbamba Jean Paul, Emmanuel Vounserbo, Etienne Bemadjim, Hensel Fopa Kueteyem and Kenmoe Georges Aime Wildlife Conservation Society Ministry of Forests and Wildlife (MINFOF) L'Ecole de Faune de Garoua Funded by the Great Elephant Census Paul G. Allen Foundation and WCS SUMMARY The Bouba N’djida - Sena Oura - Benoue - Faro Landscape is located in north Cameroon and extends into southwest Chad. It consists of Bouba N’djida, Sena Oura, Benoue and Faro National Parks, in addition to 25 safari hunting zones. Along with Zakouma NP in Chad and Waza NP in the Far North of Cameroon, the landscape represents one of the most important areas for savanna elephant conservation remaining in Central Africa. Aerial wildlife surveys in the landscape were first undertaken in 1977 by Van Lavieren and Esser (1979) focusing only on Bouba N’djida NP. They documented a population of 232 elephants in the park. After a long period with no systematic aerial surveys across the area, Omondi et al (2008) produced a minimum count of 525 elephants for the entire landscape. This included 450 that were counted in Bouba N’djida NP and its adjacent safari hunting zones. The survey also documented a high richness and abundance of other large mammals in the Bouba N’djida NP area, and to the southeast of Faro NP. In the period since 2010, a number of large-scale elephant poaching incidents have taken place in Bouba N’djida NP.
    [Show full text]
  • Panthera Pardus) Range Countries
    Profiles for Leopard (Panthera pardus) Range Countries Supplemental Document 1 to Jacobson et al. 2016 Profiles for Leopard Range Countries TABLE OF CONTENTS African Leopard (Panthera pardus pardus)...................................................... 4 North Africa .................................................................................................. 5 West Africa ................................................................................................... 6 Central Africa ............................................................................................. 15 East Africa .................................................................................................. 20 Southern Africa ........................................................................................... 26 Arabian Leopard (P. p. nimr) ......................................................................... 36 Persian Leopard (P. p. saxicolor) ................................................................... 42 Indian Leopard (P. p. fusca) ........................................................................... 53 Sri Lankan Leopard (P. p. kotiya) ................................................................... 58 Indochinese Leopard (P. p. delacouri) .......................................................... 60 North Chinese Leopard (P. p. japonensis) ..................................................... 65 Amur Leopard (P. p. orientalis) ..................................................................... 67 Javan Leopard
    [Show full text]
  • Threat of Rapid Extermination of the Lion (Panthera Leo Leo) in Waza National Park, Northern Cameroon
    Threat of rapid extermination of the lion (Panthera leo leo) in Waza National Park, Northern Cameroon P. N. Tumenta1,2*, J. S. Kok1, J. C. van Rijssel1, R. Buij1,2, B. M. Croes1,2, P. J. Funston3, H. H. de Iongh1 and H. A. Udo de Haes1 1Institute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, PO Box 9518, 2300RA Leiden, The Netherlands, 2Centre for Environment and Development studies in Cameroon, Maroua ⁄ Department of Forestry, University of Dschang, PO Box 479, Dschang, Cameroon and 3Department of Nature Conservation, Tshwane University of Technology Pretoria, Private Bag X680 Pretoria, 0001, South Africa en identifiant individuellement ses membres. On a estime´ Abstract que cette population comptait de 14 a` 21 adultes. La Lion populations in West and Central Africa are small and structure d’aˆge e´tait biaise´e en faveur des adultes; les fragmented. In areas where park management is weak, lionceaux repre´sentaient 22% de tous les lions identifie´set threats will likely facilitate the extinction of the lion. le sex-ratio e´tait de 1 ⁄ 3. Deux des quatre lions e´quipe´s d’un Wildlife management requires knowledge of the popula- collier e´metteur furent tue´s ille´galement en un an, en guise tion estimate. The population of lions in Waza National de repre´sailles; deux autres maˆles et une autre femelle Park (Waza NP) was assessed by individual identification furent aussi tue´s pendant cette pe´riode. La population de of members in the population. The population was assessed lions semble avoir de´cline´ au cours des cinq dernie`res to comprise of 14–21 adult individual lions.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Human Wildlife Conflict in Cameroon
    Overview of Human Wildlife Conflict in Cameroon Poto: Etoga Gilles WWF Campo, 2011 By Antoine Justin Eyebe Guy Patrice Dkamela Dominique Endamana POVERTY AND CONSERVATION LEARNING GROUP DISCUSSION PAPER NO 05 February 2012 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 3 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 4 2. Evidence of HWC in Cameroon............................................................................................ 4 3. Typology of HWC ................................................................................................................. 7 3.1 Crop destruction ........................................................................................................... 7 3.2 Attacks on domestic animals ..................................................................................... 10 3.3 Human death, injuries and damage to property ....................................................... 11 4. The Policy and Institutional Framework for Human-Wildlife Conflict Management at the State level in Cameroon ............................................................................................................ 11 4.1. Statutory instruments and institutions for HWC management ................................. 12 4.1.1 Protection of persons and property against animals ......................................... 12 4.1.2 Compensation
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of Cheetah and Af- Rican Wild Dog in the Bénoué Ecosystem, North Cameroon
    original contribution HANS H. DE IONGH1*, BARBARA CROES1, GREG RASMUSSEN2, RALPH BUIJ3 AND Study area PAUL FUNSTON4 The North Province of Cameroon (Fig. 1) is covered (44%) by natural woodland and con- The status of cheetah and Af- tains three national parks and 28 hunting zones. Poaching is a threat to wildlife and is rican wild dog in the Bénoué mainly related to rapid human encroachment in this area. Human population growth is re- Ecosystem, North Cameroon latively high in the area at around 2.6 % p.a. and mostly results from immigration from Here we present the results of a research programme on large carnivores imple- other provinces or neighbouring countries mented in the Bénoué Ecosystem of North Cameroon. The area comprises three na- with a diverse ethnic background (De Iongh tional parks (Bénoué, Bouba-Ndjidda and Faro, with a total surface of 7,300 km2) and et al. 2010) a large area comprising 28 hunting zones (with a total surface of 15,700 km2) that is The Bénoué Ecosystem (BE) is part of an ex- contiguous and surrounds all three parks. Three years of surveys (2007-2010) covered tensive protected area complex, the Bénoué- 4,200 km of spoor transects, 1,200 camera-trap days, 109 interviews with local villag- Gashaka Gumti area, of about 30,000 km2 in ers, and direct observations. From these data we conclude that cheetahs Acinonyx North Cameroon and Nigeria. The Bénoué- jubatus and African wild dogs Lycaon pictus are functionally extinct in the Bénoué Gashaka Gumti area consists of these Natio- Ecosystem and probably also in other areas of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Cameroon Country Profile Update 2019
    Country Profile Republic of Cameroon Giraffe Conservation Status Report August 2019 General statistics Size of country: 475,400 km² Size of protected areas / percentage protected area coverage: 15.2 % Species and subspecies In 2016 the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) completed the first detailed assessment of the conservation status of giraffe, revealing that their numbers are in peril. This was further emphasised when the majority of the IUCN recognised subspecies where assessed in 2018 – some as Critically Endangered. While this update further confirms the real threat to one of Africa’s most charismatic megafauna, it also highlights a rather confusing aspect of giraffe conservation: how many species/subspecies of giraffe are there? The IUCN currently recognises one species (Giraffa camelopardalis) and nine subspecies of giraffe (Muller et al. 2016) historically based on outdated assessments of their morphological features and geographic ranges. The subspecies are thus divided: Angolan giraffe (G. c. angolensis), Kordofan giraffe (G. c. antiquorum), Masai giraffe (G. c. tippleskirchi), Nubian giraffe (G. c. camelopardalis), reticulated giraffe (G. c. reticulata), Rothschild’s giraffe (G. c. rothschildi), South African giraffe (G. c. giraffa), Thornicroft’s giraffe (G. c. thornicrofti) and West African giraffe (G. c. peralta). However, over the past decade GCF together with their partner Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F) have performed the first-ever comprehensive DNA sampling and analysis (genomic, nuclear and mitochondrial) from all major natural populations of giraffe throughout their range in Africa. As a result, an update to the traditional taxonomy now exists. This study revealed that there are four distinct species of giraffe and likely five subspecies (Fennessy et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Crime and Monitoring: Applications for Ranger-Collected
    Wildlife Crime and Monitoring: Applications for Ranger-Collected Data Duncan Graeme Lister Master of Science (by Research) University of York Biology November 2018 Abstract Anthropogenic factors such as habitat loss, over-harvesting and the introduction of non-native species are causing declines in global biodiversity. In sub-Saharan Africa, illegal hunting for bushmeat or high-value products such as rhino horn and ivory is threatening many mammal populations. Monitoring these populations is vital to ensuring their survival, yet professional scientific monitoring programs are costly and logistically difficult. Ranger-based monitoring, where rangers record evidence of illegal activities or wildlife sightings when on patrol is becoming increasingly popular. Here, we use maps of occurrence probability of bushmeat poaching derived from ranger-collected data in Queen Elizabeth National Park (QENP), Uganda, to determine the direct impacts of illegal hunting on herbivore populations. We found that the main target species for bushmeat poaching, Uganda kob, showed declines in areas predicted to have high poaching risk, reporting population level impacts of illegal hunting in a savannah for the first time. We go on to document how ranger-collected elephant sightings data can be used to predict their spatial distribution within QENP, using Bayesian hierarchical occupancy modelling to address the non-systematic method of data collection. We also attempt to create a time series model of elephant abundance in order to predict rapid declines that can occur in elephant populations. We conclude by highlighting the potential for ranger-based monitoring and ranger- collected data, suggesting ways it might be incorporated to continually monitor vulnerable populations in light of a rapidly expanding human population.
    [Show full text]
  • The International Tropical Timber Organization
    INTERNATIONAL TROPICAL TIMBER ORGANIZATION ITTO PRE-PROECT PROPOSAL INTITULÉ: SUPPORT TO THE CREATION OF GREEN BELTS AROUND THE WAZA, BENOUÉ, FARO AND BOUBA NDJIDDA NATIONAL PARKS SERIAL NUMBER PPD 178/14 Rev.2 (F) COMMITTEE REFORESTATION AND FOREST MANAGEMENT SUBMITTED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF CAMEROON ORIGINAL LANGUAGE FRENCH SUMMARY The plant formations of the Waza, Faro, Benue and Bouba Ndjidda National Parks are subject to multiple threats that jeopardize their existence. These threats stem from the way subsistence needs of local communities are addressed including their needs for fuel wood and wood material for rural infrastructure and fences, and this situation is maintained through a lack of local initiatives to rehabilitate the degrading plant cover. National Parks are the least degraded areas in the different regions. To reduce the rate of degradation of the plant cover and improve the supply of fuel wood and construction wood in the areas surrounding these parks, it is appropriate to launch a project to establish green belts around these national parks. However, the lack of information required for setting up such project calls for the prior formulation of a pre- project whose implementation will consist in the conduct of baseline studies and the formulation of a full project proposal. EXECUTING AGENCY DIRECTORATE OF WILDLIFE AND CONSERVATION AREAS (DFAP) /MINFOF COLLABORATING AGENCY --- DURATION 6 MONTHS APPROXIMATE STARTING DATE TO BE DECIDED BUDGET AND FUNDING Source Contribution Local currency SOURCES : in US$ equivalent ITTO $ 86,240 Govn’t of Cameroon $ 13,650 TOTAL $ 99,890 Table of Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................................................. 1 PART 1. PRE-PROJECT CONTEXT ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Impact of Trophy Hunting
    Biological Conservation 144 (2011) 3064–3072 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon The impact of trophy hunting on lions (Panthera leo) and other large carnivores in the Bénoué Complex, northern Cameroon ⇑ B.M. Croes a, P.J. Funston b, G. Rasmussen c,d, R. Buij a, A. Saleh e, P.N. Tumenta a,f, H.H. de Iongh a, a Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden University, PO Box 9518, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands b Department of Nature Conservation, Tshwane University of Technology, Private Bag X680, Pretoria 0002, South Africa c Painted Dog Conservation (PDC), Hwange National Park, Box 72, Dete, Zimbabwe d Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK e Ministry of Fauna and Forests (MINFOF), BP 126 Garoua, Cameroon f Department of Forestry, University of Dschang, Cameroon article info abstract Article history: In West and Central Africa large carnivores have become increasingly rare as a consequence of rapid hab- Received 30 June 2011 itat destruction and lack of resources for protected area management. The Bénoué Complex (23,394 km2) Received in revised form 23 September in northern Cameroon is a regionally critical area for large mammal conservation. In the complex lions 2011 (Panthera leo), leopards (Panthera pardus) and spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta) are formally protected Accepted 25 September 2011 in three national parks and 28 hunting zones. Over-hunting may be having a strong additive effect Available online 3 November 2011 precipitating declines in large carnivore numbers across the complex.
    [Show full text]
  • NAPA News from African Protected Areas
    NAPA News from African Protected Areas Nouvelles des Aires Protégées N°66 en Afrique July 2013 What future for lions (Panthera leo) in Waza the tourism industry, lions are fast disappearing from National Park, Cameroon? much of their historical range and are threatened in (directions 4 and 5 of the road map for African PAs) part of their present range. By Dr Pricelia Tumenta Fobuzie, University of Dschang, Cameroon. Protected areas play a key role in the conservation of biodiversity. Cameroon currently has an important network of protected areas, covering 19.2% of the national territory. This is credited to government’s efforts to put in place strategies to conserve the different ecosystems in the country together with the flora and fauna they contain. Waza National Park is one of the best examples of protected areas in Cameroon, situated in the Sudano-sahelian savanna ecosystem in the extreme north region of the country. About one third of Waza National Park falls within the Waza-Logone wetlands making this park a haven for water birds. The mammalian diversity of the park is quite rich including elephant, giraffe, roan antelope, topi, hyena, jackal and the lion. The park is a popular destination for tourists because of its openness and richness in wildlife species. The lion (Panthera leo) is a species of international importance due to its keystone, flagship, cultural and charismatic attributes. Widely distributed in the past, more than 95% of lions have disappeared from the surface of the earth the past c.10, 000 years. The steady and rapid increase in human population with the commensurate increase in demand for living space and resources seems to be the main overriding factor working against many conservation There are presently about 32, 000 lions left in Africa efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • LDPI Working Paper
    Property and Negotiation in Waza National Park Alice Kelly LDPI Working Paper Property and Negotiation in Waza National Park By Alice Kelly Published by: The Land Deal Politics Initiative www.iss.nl/ldpi [email protected] in collaboration with: Institute for Development Studies (IDS) University of Sussex Library Road Brighton, BN1 9RE United Kingdom Tel: +44 1273 606261 Fax: +44 1273 621202 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.ids.ac.uk Initiatives in Critical Agrarian Studies (ICAS) International Institute of Social Studies (ISS) P.O. Box 29776 2502 LT The Hague The Netherlands Tel: +31 70 426 0664 Fax: +31 70 426 0799 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.iss.nl/icas The Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies (PLAAS) School of Government, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences University of the Western Cape, Private Bag X17 Bellville 7535, Cape Town South Africa Tel: +27 21 959 3733 Fax: +27 21 959 3732 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.plaas.org.za The Polson Institute for Global Development Department of Development Sociology Cornell University 133 Warren Hall Ithaca NY 14853 United States of America Tel: +1 607 255-3163 Fax: +1 607 254-2896 E-mail: [email protected] Website: polson.cals.cornell.edu © February 2013 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior permission from the publisher and the author. Published with support from the UK Department for International Development (DfID), Atlantic Philanthropies, Inter‐Church Organization for Development Cooperation (ICCO), Ford Foundation and Miserior.
    [Show full text]
  • Request for Project Funding from the Adaptation Fund
    REQUEST FOR PROJECT FUNDING FROM THE ADAPTATION FUND The annexed form should be completed and transmitted to the Adaptation Fund Board Secretariat by email or fax. Please type in the responses using the template provided. The instructions attached to the form provide guidance to filling out the template. Please note that a project/programme must be fully prepared (i.e., fully appraised for feasibility) when the request is submitted. The final project/programme document resulting from the appraisal process should be attached to this request for funding. Complete documentation should be sent to: The Adaptation Fund Board Secretariat 1818 H Street NW MSN P4-400 Washington, D.C., 20433 U.S.A Fax: +1 (202) 522-3240/5 Email: [email protected] 1 PROJECT PROPOSAL TO THE ADAPTATION FUND Table of content PART I: PROJECT INFORMATION ............................................................................................ 5 1 Project Background and Context ......................................................................................6 1.1 Country overview ......................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Socio-cultural context ................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Economic Context ........................................................................................................ 7 1.4 Agriculture sector ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]