The Inyo County Regional Transportation Plan 2019-2039

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Inyo County Regional Transportation Plan 2019-2039 The Inyo County Regional Transportation Plan Prepared2019-2039 For the PUBLIC DRAFT NEVADA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Prepared for the Prepared by LSC Transportation Consultants County Of Inyo Inyo County Regional Transportation Plan 2019-2039 Prepared for the Inyo County Local Transportation Commission 168 N. Edwards St Independence, CA 93526 760 • 878-0201 Prepared by LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. 2690 Lake Forest Road Post Office Box 5875 Tahoe City, California 96145 530 • 583-4053 June 12, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction and RTP Overview ................................................................................................ 1 Plan Development and Process ....................................................................................................... 2 Participation and Consultation Process ........................................................................................... 2 Social Equity and Environmental Justice Considerations .............................................................. 15 Coordination with Other Plans and Studies ................................................................................... 16 Chapter 2: Background Conditions ............................................................................................................ 17 Regional Characteristics ................................................................................................................. 17 Public Health and Health Equity .................................................................................................... 24 Transportation Land Use Integration ............................................................................................. 25 Chapter 3: Modal Discussion ..................................................................................................................... 27 Roadway Transportation System Description ............................................................................... 27 Summary of Roadway and Bridge Needs ....................................................................................... 42 Transit Services .............................................................................................................................. 44 Non‐Motorized Facilities ................................................................................................................ 50 Transportation System Operations and Management .................................................................. 66 Air Quality ...................................................................................................................................... 67 Chapter 4: Policy Element .......................................................................................................................... 69 Goals, Policies and Objectives........................................................................................................ 69 Goals and Policies .......................................................................................................................... 70 Chapter 5: Action Element ......................................................................................................................... 79 Plan Assumptions ........................................................................................................................... 79 Transportation Safety .................................................................................................................... 80 Transportation Security/Emergency Preparedness ....................................................................... 81 Transportation System Improvements .......................................................................................... 82 Proposed Projects .......................................................................................................................... 86 Inyo County Strategies to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Address Climate Change .... 106 Chapter 6: Financial Element ................................................................................................................... 109 Roadway Improvement Funding .................................................................................................. 109 Transit Improvement Funding ..................................................................................................... 117 Aviation ........................................................................................................................................ 120 Projected Revenues ..................................................................................................................... 121 Appendix A: Public/Stakeholder Involvement Appendix B: US 395 Corridor Crashes Appendix C: A Simplified Overview of Transportation Funding Inyo County Regional Transportation Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page i LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 1 Participation Process During RTP Development .............................................................................. 4 2 Inyo County Median Household Income ....................................................................................... 15 3 Inyo County 2016 Demographic Estimates .................................................................................... 19 4 Inyo County Population Projections .............................................................................................. 20 5 Inyo County Commute Patterns .................................................................................................... 24 6 Inyo County Annual Average Daily Traffic Volumes on State Highways ........................................ 32 7 Into County Peak Month Average Daily Traffic Volumes on State Highways ................................ 34 8 Traffic Counts in Death Valley National Park ................................................................................. 34 9 Inyo County State Highway Peak Hour Roadway Level of Service ................................................ 35 10 Truck Traffic on Inyo County State Highways ................................................................................ 63 11 RTP Program Level Performance Measures .................................................................................. 83 12 Recently Completed Transportation Improvement Projects in Inyo County ................................ 86 13 Caltrans District 9 Recently Completed SHOPP Transportation Improvement Projects ............... 87 14 Caltrans SHOPP Projects ................................................................................................................ 88 15 Caltrans SHOPP Minor Projects ..................................................................................................... 89 16 Inyo County Top Priority Funded Regional Roadway .................................................................... 90 17 Inyo County Regional Roadway Projects – Long Term Part 1 ........................................................ 93 18 Inyo County Regional Roadway Projects – Long Term Part 2 ........................................................ 94 19 Inyo County Regional Highway Bridge Program Projects .............................................................. 95 20 Inyo County Regional Roadway Projects ....................................................................................... 96 21 Inyo County Regional Public Transit Projects ................................................................................ 97 22 Inyo County Active Transportation Funded Projects ..................................................................... 97 23 Inyo County Unfunded Active Transportation Projects – Part 1/2 ................................................ 99 24 Inyo County Unfunded Active Transportation Projects – Part 2/2 .............................................. 100 25 Inyo County Regional Unfunded Bicycle Facility Projects – Part 1/2 ........................................... 101 26 Inyo County Regional Unfunded Bicycle Facility Projects – Part 2/2 ........................................... 103 27 Inyo County Regional Airport Capital Improvement Projects...................................................... 104 28 Inyo County Regional Airport Capital Improvement Projects ..................................................... 105 29 RTP Forecast Revenue Summary ................................................................................................. 122 30 Regional Roadway/Bridge and STIP Funded Bicycle/Pedestrian Capital Improvement .............. 123 31 Long‐Term Regional Transportation Capital Improvements Projects Revenue to Expenditure Comparions ........................................................................... 124 Inyo County Regional Transportation Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Page ii LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE 1 Inyo County Site and Location Map ............................................................................................... 18 2 Inyo County Historical Population Trends ..................................................................................... 19 3 Inyo County Population Projections .............................................................................................. 20 4 2016 Traffic Volumes Inyo County ................................................................................................. 33 5 2013 Bishop Area Traffic Volumes ................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Technical Memorandum
    Technical Memorandum DATE: July 3, 2019 PROJECT: 19-1-047 TO: Shawnda Grady, ESQ Ellison, Schneider, Harris & Donlan FROM: Eddy Teasdale, P.G., CHG. Mehrdad Bastani SUBJECT: Ground Water (Hydrologic) Technical Memorandum Report to Support San Bernardino Conditional Use Permit Related to Adequate Service Certification Water and Sewer (Form W2) - PVL Lime Plant APN: 0485-031-12 1 INTRODUCTION This Technical Memorandum (TM) describes the process used to determine groundwater availability and evaluate potential impacts of operating a new planned industrial well on existing groundwater users in the area. Provided herein are the key findings, conclusions, and preliminary recommendations regarding water availability for the proposed PVL processing plant in Trona, California (Project). Implementation of the Project will utilize water from a recently installed on-site production well. For drinking water, the Project proposed to utilize an estimated 1.3 gallons per minute (gpm). To meet operational requirements related to domestic and processing usage, the new planned well will need to produce a maximum of 30 gpm (49 AF/year). 2 GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY Searles Valley is a north-trending structural valley that is bound by the Argus Range on the west and north and by the Slate Range on the north and east. The Garlock Fault is generally recognized as the southern limit of the groundwater basin, however topographically, the surface water drainage area of the valley continues south of the Garlock fault. The area of the Searles Valley drainage basin is estimated to be about 693 square miles. There are three primary hydrogeologic units within the Searles Valley, alluvial deposits, saline deposits and bedrock complex.
    [Show full text]
  • Ridgecrest BUREAU of LAND MANAGEMENT
    BLM SPECIAL EDITION 1998 EXAMPLES OF AGENCY SIGNS SURFACE MANAGEMENT STATUS DESERT ACCESS GUIDE Ridgecrest BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT USDA FOREST SERVICE l:100,0()0-Scale topographic map showing: Highways, roads and other manmade structures Water features • Contours and elevations in meters Recreation sites • Coverage of former desert access guide #4 Ridgecrest NATIONAL PARK SERVICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS Edited and published by the Bureau of Land Management National Applied Resource Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado in cooperation with the Bureau of Land Management California State Office. Planimetry partially revised by BLM from various source material. Revised information not field . he. i-rd Base map prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey. Compiled from USGS 1:24,000 and l:62,5O0-scale topographic maps dated 1949-1973, and from advance materials. Partially revised from aerial photographs taken 1973-1989 and other source data. Revised information not CALIFORNIA STATE field checked. Map edited 1993. VEHICULAR RECREATION AREA Help protect your public lands by observing posted Projection and 10,000-meter grid, zone 11: Universal OHV designations. Watch for OHV signs and read hari'.verse Mercator. 25,000-foot grid licks based on them carefully. California coordinate system, zone 4 and 5. 1927 North American Datum. For more information contact the HIM, USDA Forest Service, National Park Service, California State Park, or California State Motorized Vechicle Recreation Area Land lines are omitted in areas of extensive tract surveys. Office (see back panel for address and phone There may be private inholdings within the boundaries of numbers).
    [Show full text]
  • 4.5 Cultural Resources
    4.5 – Cultural Resources 4.5 Cultural Resources This section identifies cultural and paleontological resources along the IC Project Alignment, identifies applicable significance thresholds, assesses the IC Project’s impacts to these resources and their significance, and recommends measures to avoid or substantially reduce any effects found to be potentially significant. Cultural resources are defined as any object or specific location of past human activity, occupation, or use that is identifiable through historical documentation, inventory, or oral evidence. Cultural resources can be separated into three categories: archaeological, building/structural, and traditional resources. Archaeological resources include prehistoric and historic remains of human activity. Prehistoric resources can be composed of lithic scatters, ceramic scatters, quarries, habitation sites, temporary camps/rock rings, ceremonial sites, and trails. Historic-era resources are typically those that are 50 years or older. Historic archaeological resources can consist of structural remains (e.g., concrete foundations), historic objects (e.g., bottles and cans), features (e.g., refuse deposits or scatters), and sites (e.g., resources that contain one or more of the aforementioned categories). Built environment resources range from historic buildings to canals, historic roads and trails, bridges, ditches, cemeteries, and electrical infrastructure, such as transmission lines, substations, and generating facilities. A traditional cultural resource is a resource associated with the cultural practices, traditions, beliefs, lifeways, arts, crafts, or social institutions of a living community. They are rooted in a traditional community’s history and are important in maintaining the continuing cultural identity of the community. See Section 4.18, Tribal Cultural Resources, for a discussion on cultural resources of potential importance to California Native American tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • An Outline of the Story of Trona, from BLM Records
    An Outline the Story of the Trona Area from Bureau of Land Management Records March 2014 Larry M Vredenburgh Bureau of Land Management 3801 Pegasus Drive Bakersfield, CA 93308 [email protected] BLM Web Resources Over the last few years Bureau of Land Management land records have been made available to the public on two websites. The Official Federal Land Records Site (http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/), hosts transcribed records as well as original documents, survey plats and Master Title Plats. The Bureau of Land Management’s Land & Mineral Legacy Rehost 2000 System website, known as LR2000, (http://www.blm.gov/lr2000/) compliments the “GLO Records” site by providing additional ways to query BLM records, as well as more detailed reports on land use authorizations. These websites provide researchers with a treasure trove of historic information. I have utilized a sample of this information to create an outline of the story of the development of the Trona area. Land Patents According to no less a source than Wikipedia, a land patent is, “. an exclusive land grant made by a sovereign entity over the land in question. To make such a grant “patent”, a sovereign (proprietary landowner) must document the land grant, securely sign and seal the document (patent), and openly publish the documents for the public to see.” On March 4, 1788, the first land patent was issued by the United States of America to John Martin in what is now Belmont County, Ohio. Twenty- four years later, in 1812, the General Land Office (GLO) was created to handle and dispose of public lands.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Linkchapter
    Index (Italic page numbers indicate major references) Abalone Cove landslide, California, Badger Spring, Nevada, 92, 94 Black Dyke Formation, Nevada, 69, 179, 180, 181, 183 Badwater turtleback, California, 128, 70, 71 abatement districts, California, 180 132 Black Mountain Basalt, California, Abrigo Limestone, Arizona, 34 Bailey ash, California, 221, 223 135 Acropora, 7 Baked Mountain, Alaska, 430 Black Mountains, California, 121, Adams Argillite, Alaska, 459, 462 Baker’s Beach, California, 267, 268 122, 127, 128, 129 Adobe Range, Nevada, 91 Bald Peter, Oregon, 311 Black Point, California, 165 Adobe Valley, California, 163 Balloon thrust fault, Nevada, 71, 72 Black Prince Limestone, Arizona, 33 Airport Lake, California, 143 Banning fault, California, 191 Black Rapids Glacier, Alaska, 451, Alabama Hills, California, 152, 154 Barrett Canyon, California, 202 454, 455 Alaska Range, Alaska, 442, 444, 445, Barrier, The, British Columbia, 403, Blackhawk Canyon, California, 109, 449, 451 405 111 Aldwell Formation, Washington, 380 Basin and Range Province, 29, 43, Blackhawk landslide, California, 109 algae 48, 51, 53, 73, 75, 77, 83, 121, Blackrock Point, Oregon, 295 Oahu, 6, 7, 8, 10 163 block slide, California, 201 Owens Lake, California, 150 Basin Range fault, California, 236 Blue Lake, Oregon, 329 Searles Valley, California, 142 Beacon Rock, Oregon, 324 Blue Mountains, Oregon, 318 Tatonduk River, Alaska, 459 Bear Meadow, Washington, 336 Blue Mountain unit, Washington, 380 Algodones dunes, California, 101 Bear Mountain fault zone, California,
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Falls 4 That…It Was a Cool and Windy Morning Interesting, Depending on Your Viewpoint
    DESERT NO. 99 J UNE 2004 EXPLORERS 4WD SECTION OF THE MOJAVE RIVER VALLEY MUSEUM Cabin is well-marked and the cabin itself is unlocked and has a visitor register. It is quite clean and in very good shape. The parking area and tiny turn-around loop are going to offer a real space-utilization problem when Hallett Newman, his family and friends, and our small group of Desert Explorers meet there on the weekend of May 15 for our dinner and camp- TTRRIIPP out. Clearly, some vehicles will have to be parked alongside the road, away from the cabin. After we finished our inspection and signed RREEPPOORRTTSS in as visitors, we continued up-canyon to the turnoff to the Barker and Meyers Ranches and Goler Canyon Pre- on to those ranches. Bill Ott showed me where Charles Manson was hiding (under the sink) at In this issue: Run the Barker property when he was arrested. The Meyers Ranch is fenced and seriously posted as • Goler Canyon Pre-Run 1 April 22, 2004 private property, so we stayed on the road. • Lookie-Loos at Little Lake 2 • Re-Subscribers 3 Led and reported by John Page We decided to have lunch at Mengel Pass so • Little Petroglyph Canyon 3 continued farther up-canyon. The road above • Ayers Rock 3 T WAS A DARK AND STORMY NIGHT …NO , STRIKE the turnoff: a) deteriorates, or b) becomes • Fossil Falls 4 that…it was a cool and windy morning interesting, depending on your viewpoint. There • Rondezvous Auction Results 5 • Trip Schedule 5 IIwhen Bill Ott and I met at the Desert Empire are a number of tight, rocky turns and other • Next Meeting 5 Fairgrounds at 9:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • From Rancholabrean Paleo-Grocery Stores to Rock Art on the Web
    FROM RANCHOLABREAN PALEO-GROCERY STORES TO ROCK ART ON THE WEB Judyth Reed Bureau of Land Management Ridgecrest Field Office Ridgecrest, CA . ~-. The Bureau of Land MaRagement (BLM) Ridgecrest Field Office is the northernmost unit of the Califomia Desert Distriot.It manages land that stretches from the norttiern Mojave Desert and the Nevada border south and west as far as the San Gabriel Mountains. Topography, flora, fauna, and evidences of the prehistoric and historic ,past are as varied as the swath it cuts across California. The archaeological history of the area ranges from pioneering work by Emma Lou Davis, Mark Harrington, Lydia Clements, Ruth DeEUe'Simpson, Crement Meighan and others to contemporary cultural resources management including site steward$hip by the public and rock art on the web. INTRODUCTION are, in order to focus on where we should try to be in the near future and twenty-five years from The first twenty-five years of cultural resource now. management in the Ridgecrest area, as on other public lands, have mirrored not only changing approaches to cultural resource management but BACKGROUND also changing theoretical approaches in archaeology as a whole. The scope and/or focus The Ridgecrest Field Office is the of both CRM and archaeological theory have northernmost management unit of the Bureau of shifted over the past twenty-five years and Land Management (BLM) California Desert interestingly, the shift seems to have been in Conservation Area (COCA). The COCA is different opposite directions. Yet both respond to from every other BLM unit. It was mandated by changing social interests and needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources
    Draft DRECP and EIR/EIS CHAPTER III.8. CULTURAL RESOURCES III.8 CULTURAL RESOURCES This chapter presents the environmental setting/affected environment for the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP) for cultural resources. More than 32,000 cultural resources are known in the Plan Area and occur in every existing environmental context, from mountain crests to dry lake beds, and include both surface and sub-surface deposits. Cultural resources are categorized as buildings, sites, structures, objects, and districts under both federal law (for the purposes of the National Environmental Policy Act [NEPA] and the National Historic Preservation Act [NHPA]) and under California state law (for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act [CEQA]). Historic properties are cultural resources included in, or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) maintained by the Secretary of the Interior and per the NRHP eligibility criteria (36 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 60.4). See Section III.8.1.1 for more information on federal regulations and historic properties. Historical resources are cultural resources that meet the criteria for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) (14 California Code of Regulations [CCR] Section 4850) or that meet other criteria specified in CEQA (see Section III.8.1.2). See Section III.8.1.2 for more information on state regulations and historical resources. This chapter discusses three types of cultural resources classified by their origins: prehistoric, ethnographic, and historic. Prehistoric cultural resources are associated with the human occupation and use of Cali- fornia prior to prolonged European contact.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoseismology of the Central Garlock Fault in Searles Valley, California
    California State University, San Bernardino CSUSB ScholarWorks Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations Office of aduateGr Studies 12-2019 PALEOSEISMOLOGY OF THE CENTRAL GARLOCK FAULT IN SEARLES VALLEY, CALIFORNIA Kyle Pena Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons, and the Tectonics and Structure Commons Recommended Citation Pena, Kyle, "PALEOSEISMOLOGY OF THE CENTRAL GARLOCK FAULT IN SEARLES VALLEY, CALIFORNIA" (2019). Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations. 956. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd/956 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Office of aduateGr Studies at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PALEOSEISMOLOGY OF THE CENTRAL GARLOCK FAULT IN SEARLES VALLEY, CALIFORNIA A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Earth and Environmental Sciences by Kyle Anthony Peña December 2019 PALEOSEISMOLOGY OF THE CENTRAL GARLOCK FAULT IN SEARLES VALLEY, CALIFORNIA A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino by Kyle Anthony Peña December 2019 Approved by: Sally McGill, Committee Chair, Geological Sciences Joan E. Fryxell, Committee Member, Geological Sciences Kerry D. Cato, Committee Member, Geological Sciences © 2019 Kyle Anthony Peña ABSTRACT In this study, a paleoseismic trench with limited age constraints that was previously excavated in 1990 across the central Garlock Fault near Christmas Canyon, in Searles Valley, California, was reopened to take advantage of new advances in luminescence dating techniques to investigate potential temporal variability in earthquake recurrence on the Garlock Fault and to analyze previously unexposed older earthquake evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • BLM Worksheets
    Panamint/Argus Description/Location: Panamint/Argus, subdivided into 2 units: Panamint Lake Unit and the Mountain Unit. Located between Argus Wilderness and Death Valley National Park. Nationally Significant Values: Ecological: This area encompasses an essential movement corridor which links wildlife habitats in the China Lake Naval Air Weapons Station and Argus Wilderness to those protected by the Death Valley National Park. This corridor was developed by the SC Wildlands group (Science and Collaboration for Connected Wildlands). SC Wildlands was part of a team that worked with the California Departments of Transportation and Fish and Game on a statewide habitat connectivity effort from which this unit was developed. The habitat suitability and movement needs of over 40 selected focal species were used in this process. Desert Bighorn sheep and Mojave ground squirrels are two of those focal species that occur here. In addition, the area provides excellent habitat for foraging and nesting of numerous raptor species, including golden eagles and prairie falcons. The Slate, Argus, and Panamint Mountain ranges would be included in this large unit. These ranges provide habitat for Nelson's desert bighorn sheep, Townsend’s big‐eared bats, and the federally threatened Inyo California towhee. The abandoned mines in this area have historically housed the largest maternity colonies of Townsend’s big‐eared bats in the Western Mojave Desert. It is likely that unsurveyed mines in the Slates and Argus Range also house large colonies. The area also includes Mohave ground squirrel (MGS) core habitat within the MGS Conservation Area. This is 1 of only 11 core population centers.
    [Show full text]
  • West Mojave Route Management Plan, Historic Properties Treatment Plan, Attachment 5: Historic Trails Context Study FINAL VERSION May 2019
    West Mojave Route Management Plan, Historic Properties Treatment Plan, Attachment 5: Historic Trails Context Study FINAL VERSION May 2019 Prepared for: United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management California Desert District Office 22835 Calle San Juan de Los Lagos Moreno Valley, California 92553 Prepared by: Diane L. Winslow, M.A., RPA, Shannon Davis, M.A., RPH, Sherri Andrews, M.A., RPA, Marilyn Novell, M.S., and Lindsey E. Daub, M.A., RPA 2480 N. Decatur Blvd., Suite 125 Las Vegas, NV 89108 (702) 534-0375 ASM Project Number 29070 West Mojave Route Management Plan, Historic Properties Treatment Plan, Attachment 5: Historic Trails Context Study Prepared for: United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management California Desert District Office 22835 Calle San Juan de Los Lagos Moreno Valley, California 92553 Prepared by: Diane L. Winslow, M.A., RPA, Shannon Davis, M.A., RPH, Sherri Andrews, M.A., RPA, Marilyn Novell, M.S., and Lindsey E. Daub, M.A., RPA ASM Affiliates, Inc. 2480 North Decatur Boulevard, Suite 125 Las Vegas, Nevada 89108 May 2019 PN 29070 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page MANAGEMENT SUMMARY ................................................................................. v 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1 2. LITERATURE REGARDING TRAILS, ROADS, AND HIGHWAYS ............... 7 3. DEFINING TRAILS, ROADS, AND HIGHWAYS ........................................... 9 4. PREHISTORIC, PROTO-HISTORIC, AND
    [Show full text]
  • To-Bedrock Record of Late Cenozoic Sedimentation in Searles Valley, California
    Core KM-Sj a Surf ace-to-Bedrock Record of Late Cenozoic Sedimentation in Searles Valley, California GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1256 Core KM-3, a Surf ace- to-Bedrock Record of Late Cenozoic Sedimentation in Searles Valley, California By GEORGE I. SMITH, VIRGIL J. BARCZAK, GAIL F. MOULTON, and JOSEPH C. LIDDICOAT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1256 The basin sedimentation history of Searles (dry) Lake from Miocene or early Pliocene time to the present UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1983 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Core KM-3, a surface-to-bedrock record of late Cenozoic sedimentation in Searles Valley, California. (Geological Survey professional paper 1256) Bibliography Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.16:1256 1. Rocks, sedimentary. 2. Geology, stratigraphic Cenozoic. 3. Geology California Searles Valley. 4. Borings California Searles Valley. I. Smith, George Irving, 1927- II. Title. III. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Professional Paper 1256. QE471.C73 1982 551.T8'0979495 82-600347 For sale by the Distribution Branch, U.S. Geological Survey, 604 South Pickett Street, Alexandria, VA 22304 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract................................................................................................ 1 History of sedimentation Continued Introduction ........................................................................................ 1 From Miocene or
    [Show full text]