DOCSLIB.ORG

Uk Power Giants Generating Climate Change an Analysis of the Major Uk Power Companies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Uk Power Giants Generating Climate Change an Analysis of the Major Uk Power Companies UK POWER GIANTS GENERATING CLIMATE CHANGE AN ANALYSIS OF THE MAJOR UK POWER COMPANIES A WWF-UK summary of the report by Innovest July 2005 To avoid the most serious aspects of climate change, we must ensure the rise in the global average temperature is kept below 2°C above pre-industrial levels – the critical “tipping point” for people, wildlife and habitats. Government and the business community must show leadership in changing the way we produce and use energy. WWF-UK has therefore launched a major new climate change campaign, Stop Climate Chaos! which is calling © MauriWWF-UK Rautkari / on the power sector to become CO2-free by 2050 and achieve 60 per cent reductions of CO2 emissions by 2020. And with good reason – the power sector is SUMMARY responsible for an estimated 37 per cent of global CO2 In a world where we are surrounded by real and emissions. perceived risks, it is sometimes hard to differentiate the serious from the frivolous and to work out how best to As part of its campaign, WWF has commissioned act for our future survival. Not just individuals, but Innovest to analyse the six major UK power companies. governments and companies also face this problem. Its report, UK Power Giants: Generating Climate Over the last 30 years, however, there has been a Change, ranks the companies in terms of their efforts growing awareness that one phenomenon – climate to reduce their CO2 emissions and their development change – poses a greater challenge than any other. of, and investment in, renewable energy programmes This is an issue the Prime Minister, Tony Blair, has and energy efficiency measures. The study has found: called “the single most important…that we face as a • a difference between the more forward-thinking global community”. companies – Centrica, Scottish and Southern Energy, and Scottish Power Plc – and the worst performers in the study – EDF, Powergen and Innogy; • a power sector that, while being fairly successful in meeting current minimum regulatory requirements, is generally failing to exercise sufficient leadership or implement the changes required to address climate change; • that some UK companies are taking innovative and forward-thinking actions in reducing their energy use and CO2 emissions, but are failing to apply the lessons learned across the full range of their operations; and • that the UK government has failed so far to provide the long-term framework and market conditions – especially a strong EU Emissions Trading Scheme National Allocation Plan – needed to encourage investment in a low-carbon UK economy. Results summary: Assessment matrix for the carbon risk of the six main UK power companies EDF Centrica Innogy Powergen Scottish & Scottish Southern Power Energy Historic carbon intensity of production and operations. Total GHG emissions (time-series) Carbon emissions improvements Greenhouse gas cluster Consumer EE training (demand management training) and customer incentives EE improvements Energy efficiency cluster Total renewable energy investment procured ROC/RPS tariffs obligation Non-ROC/RPS tariffs obligation, if any RE planned investments RE improvement Renewable energy cluster Top tier Middle tier Bottom tier BACKGROUND The companies powering the UK As we turn on our lights, computers, televisions, radios different market conditions, was switching back to the and kettles, most of us give little thought to where our old coal-fired power and purchasing cheaper coal from electricity comes from, how it is generated and who is eastern Europe. It is clear, therefore, that in order to supplying it. Yet every year, UK homes and businesses meet this challenge of significant and swift CO2 use around 400,000GWh of energy. Contributing up emissions cuts, the government needs to take much to 2 per cent of the UK’s Gross Domestic Product and more radical action – and the UK power sector needs supplying more than 26 million domestic customers to be willing and able to respond. around the country, the power industry is a hugely significant part of the UK economy. It is also an industry The power industry in the UK now faces a period that is undergoing major change. Just 15 years ago, the of profound change: generation and supply of UK electricity was executed by • The government has set a target of reducing UK CO2 just one government-run company, the Central Electricity emissions by 20 per cent by 2010, and 60 per cent by Generating Board. Now, there are more than 40 major 2050, with 15 per cent of our electricity aiming to be private producers in the UK, using electricity from over sourced from renewable sources by 2015. 2,000 generating stations. And whereas, in the early • The UK is facing a potential energy crisis. Twelve 1990s, most electricity was generated by coal-fired nuclear power stations currently produce 20 per cent plants, with gas generators representing just 2 per cent of the UK’s electricity demand, but retirement of old of the market, in 2005 there are more than twice as plants means that by 2020 this will have shrunk to many gas as coal plants in the UK. At present, gas- 7 per cent from only three nuclear power stations. burning coupled with nuclear production – and a small New and renewable sources of electricity, as well as amount (around 3 per cent) from renewable sources more gas, increased savings from energy efficiency, – has overtaken coal as the major fuel source in the UK. and a reduction in UK energy demand, will be needed Nonetheless, the power sector currently accounts for to fill the gap. over 30 per cent of UK CO2 emissions. • Several government studies have concluded that the only solution is a significant alteration to the way Generating climate change the UK’s heat and electricity is produced and used. ii The international community is only now waking up • The government has made a start and introduced to the massive implications of climate change on the new regulations, such as the Renewables Obligation environment, business and the worldwide economy (RO) and the Energy Efficiency Commitment (EEC), – and the imperative need to reduce the emissions of but these are just a minimum and much more needs greenhouse gases into our atmosphere. Globally, the to be done. power sector is the single largest source of CO2 into the world’s atmosphere. One average-sized coal power plant releases about 11 million tonnes of CO2 into the air every year. The “dash for gas” was a major contributing factor to the fall in UK CO2 emissions in the 1990s.The government’s Energy White Paper (EWP) i in 2003 assumed this trend would continue. Yet, with some embarrassment, the government was forced to admit that CO2 emissions were in fact on the rise again, increasing by 2.2 per cent in 2003 and 1.5 per cent in 2004. The UK power sector, faced with DIGITAL VISION The potential financial and carbon savings possible – if the political will, and the foresight within the power sector, exist to make it happen – are immense. The risks, if the power companies do not adapt, are equally huge – to society, business and the environment. For example, in July 2005 Allianz, one of the biggest financial companies in Europe, announced it would be adapting its business at board level to account for the risk of climate change. iii Who the companies are Which Company Its household name Centrica Centrica is the UK’s largest gas supplier, with an estimated market share of 64 per cent. Through its British Gas brand, Centrica claims to be the UK’s largest domestic electricity supplier. In 2003, the Centrica group’s turnover was £17.9 billion. Scottish and Southern Energy Scottish and Southern Energy is involved in generation, transmission, distribution and supply of electricity to industrial, commercial and domestic customers as well as energy trading, gas marketing, electrical and utility contracting and telecommunications. The turnover in 2004 was £5.1 billion. The company serves in excess of 5 million homes and businesses in the UK. Scottish Power serves around 6 million customers in the western US Scottish Power and across the UK. It provides electricity generation, transmission, distribution and energy supply services. Annual turnover at the end of March 2004 was c. £5.8 billion. EDF EDF Energy is part of the EDF Group, which has business interests in several parts of Europe. EDF Energy was formed from the merger of London Electricity and the Seeboard Group. EDF currently claims to be the fifth largest electricity generator in the UK, generating 7 per cent of the country’s electricity. It also distributes electricity to 7.8 million homes and businesses across London, the east of England and the south-east. The turnover in 2003 was c. £3.6 billion. Powergen (now E.ON-UK) Powergen is now run by E.ON-UK, the world’s largest investor-owned utility. It is the UK’s largest electricity supplier, generating, distributing and retailing electricity to 8.1 million UK customers. The turnover in 2003 was c. £6.8 billion. Innogy (currently RWE-npower) Innogy was created in 2000 as a result of a de-merger of National Power. In 2003, Innogy was acquired by the German utility RWE. RWE-npower supplies gas and electricity as a retail branch of RWE to 6.2 million customers. How the companies compared The companies were ranked according to three key “clusters” of criteria which affect their carbon risk – the development of and investment in renewable energy programmes; energy efficiency and demand-side energy management measures; and greenhouse gas policies and changes in their company emissions over time. Ranking Company Summary results 1 Centrica The only clear-cut CO2 risk management leader.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • State of the Energy Market 2017 REPORT
    State of the energy market 2017 REPORT State of the energy market report Foreword The energy sector is changing rapidly, with significant • Third, the dramatic progress to ensure potential benefits for consumers. clean and secure electricity supplies has sometimes come at a higher cost to • In generation, new technologies, encouraged consumers than necessary. On average, by regulation and financial support, mean that consumers currently pay about £90 each year pollution is falling rapidly. Renewable power towards environmental policies. This will rise as sources now provide around a quarter of total low-carbon generation increases. Rapid falls electricity generation, compared to 5% in 2006. in the costs of wind and solar generation show • In retail markets, the number of accounts, not the scope for competition and innovation to limit including prepayment, on poor-value standard future cost increases. But consumers will lose variable tariffs has fallen from 15 million in April out if there isn’t effective competition for low- 2016 to 14 million only 12 months later (which we carbon support schemes and for measures to estimate to be around 12 million households). This help the energy system to work effectively. is because of near-record switching rates in 2017 so far. There are two major challenges to ensure that a transformed energy market works for all consumers. These changes are exciting, but looking at the state • Vulnerable consumers must be protected, of energy markets, we have three concerns about and able to engage in the market more how they currently work for consumers: effectively. We are consulting on extending our • First, the market works well for those who safeguard tariff to a further 1 million vulnerable engage.
    [Show full text]
  • Scotland, Nuclear Energy Policy and Independence Raphael J. Heffron
    Scotland, Nuclear Energy Policy and Independence EPRG Working Paper 1407 Cambridge Working Paper in Economics 1457 Raphael J. Heffron and William J. Nuttall Abstract This paper examines the role of nuclear energy in Scotland, and the concerns for Scotland as it votes for independence. The aim is to focus directly on current Scottish energy policy and its relationship to nuclear energy. The paper does not purport to advise on a vote for or against Scottish independence but aims to further the debate in an underexplored area of energy policy that will be of value whether Scotland secures independence or further devolution. There are four central parts to this paper: (1) consideration of the Scottish electricity mix; (2) an analysis of a statement about nuclear energy made by the Scottish energy minister; (3) examination of nuclear energy issues as presented in the Scottish Independence White Paper; and (4) the issue of nuclear waste is assessed. A recurrent theme in the analysis is that whether one is for, against, or indifferent to new nuclear energy development, it highlights a major gap in Scotland’s energy and environmental policy goals. Too often, the energy policy debate from the Scottish Government perspective has been reduced to a low-carbon energy development debate between nuclear energy and renewable energy. There is little reflection on how to reduce Scottish dependency on fossil fuels. For Scotland to aspire to being a low-carbon economy, to decarbonising its electricity market, and to being a leader within the climate change community, it needs to tackle the issue of how to stop the continuation of burning fossil fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of the Green Investment Bank: Costs and Benefits, Rationale and Value for Money
    The economics of the Green Investment Bank: costs and benefits, rationale and value for money Report prepared for The Department for Business, Innovation & Skills Final report October 2011 The economics of the Green Investment Bank: cost and benefits, rationale and value for money 2 Acknowledgements This report was commissioned by the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS). Vivid Economics would like to thank BIS staff for their practical support in the review of outputs throughout this project. We would like to thank McKinsey and Deloitte for their valuable assistance in delivering this project from start to finish. In addition, we would like to thank the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), the Committee on Climate Change (CCC), the Carbon Trust and Sustainable Development Capital LLP (SDCL), for their valuable support and advice at various stages of the research. We are grateful to the many individuals in the financial sector and the energy, waste, water, transport and environmental industries for sharing their insights with us. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors and not those of BIS or any other party, and the authors take responsibility for any errors or omissions. An appropriate citation for this report is: Vivid Economics in association with McKinsey & Co, The economics of the Green Investment Bank: costs and benefits, rationale and value for money, report prepared for The Department for Business, Innovation & Skills, October 2011 The economics of the Green Investment Bank: cost and benefits, rationale and value for money 3 Executive Summary The UK Government is committed to achieving the transition to a green economy and delivering long-term sustainable growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplier Performance and the Smicop Domestic Monitoring and Compliance Survey Report: Results for Smart Meter Installations Occu
    Supplier Performance and the SMICoP Domestic Monitoring and Compliance Survey Report: Results for Smart Meter Installations occurring from October to December 2019 Published 30 June 2020 Page 1 of 26 30 Jun 2020 Summary The Smart Meter Installation Code of Practice (SMICoP) is a set of rules that energy suppliers must follow when installing smart meters in homes and smaller businesses. To make sure these standards have been met by the energy suppliers, a sample of customers are asked about their experiences when their smart meter was installed. These surveys are carried out by independent survey organisations on behalf of energy suppliers. More information regarding the methodology can be found within the Annex A of this report. The Monitoring and Compliance Customer Survey (MCCS) report was established to show if energy suppliers have met their obligations and responsibilities set out in the SMICoP rules. This report provides a summary of the answer’s customers gave about what happened when a smart meter was installed in their home. Some of the questions within the report show how your energy supplier is performing when installing smart meters in homes compared to other suppliers. Some of the questions within the report do not demonstrate the performance of an energy supplier if looked at on their own. For the questions that don’t indicate a better or worse performance, that are intended to help qualify1 a subsequent question, the information is presented listed by supplier in alphabetical order in black shaded tables and figures. Where suppliers’ performance is ranked highest to lowest, these are shown in blue shaded tables and figures.
    [Show full text]
  • Electricity NIC Submission from Western Power Distribution
    Network Innovation Competition 2017 WPD/EN/NIC/03 Innovation to enable the DSO transition Project Code/Version Number: WPD/EN/NIC/03 1 Section 1: Project Summary 1.1. Project Title Electricity Flexibility and Forecasting System 1.2. Project Executing Flexibility services successfully will be key in enabling Explanation the transition to DSO. By exploring forecast and communication requirements and by sharing information, the Electricity Flexibility and Forecasting System project will specify, build and trial the additional system functionality required by a DNO to manage these services. 1.3. Funding East Midlands, West Midlands, South West and South Wales licensee: 1.4. Project 1.4.1. The Problem(s) it is exploring description: The new capabilities DNOs require in order to perform new functions as DSOs, as outlined by the ENA workgroup. 1.4.2. The Method(s) that it will use to solve the Problem(s) The project will explore forecasting arrangements required to build a DSO system capability. It will determine system requirements incorporating common standards and will collaborate with other DSO readiness projects, enabling enhancements to be made to an existing system to deliver and prove a DSO system capability. 1.4.3. The Solution(s) it is looking to reach by applying the Method(s) The project will deliver a practical robust and accurate system capability that will enable a DNO to actively manage the provision of flexibility services necessary for transition to becoming a DSO. 1.4.4. The Benefit(s) of the project The benefit of the Electricity Flexibility and Forecasting System project will be an available flexibility management system, capable of harnessing multiple services and providing DNOs the ability to actively manage their networks.
    [Show full text]
  • A Holistic Framework for the Study of Interdependence Between Electricity and Gas Sectors
    November 2015 A holistic framework for the study of interdependence between electricity and gas sectors OIES PAPER: EL 16 Donna Peng Rahmatallah Poudineh The contents of this paper are the authors’ sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies or any of its members. Copyright © 2015 Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (Registered Charity, No. 286084) This publication may be reproduced in part for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. ISBN 978-1-78467-042-9 A holistic framework for the study of interdependence between electricity and gas sectors i Acknowledgements The authors are thankful to Malcolm Keay, Howard Rogers and Pablo Dueñas for their invaluable comments on the earlier version of this paper. The authors would also like to extend their sincere gratitude to Bassam Fattouh, director of OIES, for his support during this project. A holistic framework for the study of interdependence between electricity and gas sectors ii Contents Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................................. ii Contents ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SSEN's Electric Vehicle Strategy
    Electric Vehicle Strategy March 2020 SSEN EV Strategy March 2020 Foreword Driving the change As a Distribution Network Operator (DNO), Scottish and We have engaged closely with stakeholders to develop our thinking Southern Electricity Networks’ (SSEN’s) role in decarbonising so far and we know that cross-industry collaboration is essential. We transport is fundamental. Our actions will allow the transition have already built and shared the learnings from a range of innovation to proceed at the pace that the UK’s net zero commitment projects during the current price control period. With publication of this strategy, we are embarking on the next stage of engagement with demands. We don’t have all the answers, but this strategy sets customers and stakeholders and I invite everyone with an interest in out the principles that will guide our journey and some of the this transition to get in touch. There are ten questions at the end of knowledge that will allow us to build a roadmap to get there. this document that can help you to shape our approach to electrifying transport. I look forward to working with you. Our network, from the highlands and islands of northern Scotland to the busy streets of west London, serves customers with a wide range of needs, With the right measures in place the UK could have the most extensive all of which we must get right. We will put our customers at the heart of EV charging network in the world by 2025. this strategy, whether they are domestic, commercial or local authority bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Morrison Utility Services
    Our Capabilities Our Business Our Group 175967 M Group Services Brochure .indd 1 03/11/2017 12:37 Our Business Delivering services to a broad range of clients across regulated markets and essential infrastructure. We are proud of what we do, how we operate and what we deliver to support our client’s customers. We help our clients deliver their business plans each and every day of the year. Delivering for our clients The challenges our clients face can be from the development of collaborative complex, ever challenging budgets and working through, improvements in customer increasing customer demands mean they service, sharing of innovation and best need a service provider who can be practice, development and training, trusted to deliver quality work, consistently stakeholder management, value engineering, and safety. resource planning, business process We have developed our group capability to improvement, design and build services, align to our client’s needs and the outputs cost control & stock management, they require for their customers. Our data management to plant & fleet service operational delivery includes everything solutions. What we do We provide a broad range of essential Working in collaboration with our clients to infrastructure services within regulated deliver for their customers sectors across the UK and Ireland Proven track record and excellent client Four core regulated sectors; relationships - Utilities Nationwide coverage with over 8,000 - Transport direct staff and growing - Data - Telecommunications Service ethos
    [Show full text]
  • Powerhouse of Wave Energy
    Alternative energy Wave energy Over 20 companies developing technology British Isles - powerhouse of wave energy Surrounded by sea, the British Isles are ideally located to receive a continuous flow of renewable energy from waves. While offshore wind power is taking off, a new marine- energy industry - focusing on wave and tidal power - is emerging. With at least twenty companies involved, Britain is at the forefront of the development of wave power. Even technology from Scandinavia, the US, and Australia is being deployed and fine-tuned in British waters. | By Leen Preesman Wave power is, in theory, a highly play a major role in the energy supply. promising form of renewable energy. Nevertheless, experts agree that wave Yet, as the first commercial wave-power power can be a useful diversifier in the farms are appearing on the horizon, it energy mix, and that its economics are is clear that this technology still has a getting better as fossil-fuel prices go up. long way to go. Most projects depend heavily on subsidies, and while it is too In this article we highlight the different early to identify the successful designs, technologies that are in an advanced few companies can provide an estimate stage of development. of the production costs. Besides the technical challenge, the Pelamis Sea Snake - the world’s access to or the capacity of the grid are first wave-energy farm | often problematic in areas where wave- The Pelamis Sea Snake is among the power conditions are best. According to most promising technologies. It is a the International Energy Agency, a lack 160-meter long construction of linked of cooperation between developers as floating tubes, and the wave-induced well as the absence of guidelines and movement on the hinge points generates standards is slowing down developments.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of the GB Energy B2C Retail Market – 'The Disruption Of
    22nd Edition November 2020 World Energy Markets Observatory A brief history of the GB energy B2C retail market – ‘the disruption of incumbents’ Over the last 15 years, the GB energy retail market has changed significantly. A look back to 2005 shows 12 suppliers, with the ‘Big 6’ incumbent energy retailers – EDF Energy, British Gas, SSE, Scottish Power, npower (RWE) and E.ON having a market share of effectively 100% of the 30 million customers in the UK.1 Only 15 years later, the market in 2020 looks dramatically million in gas.3 Of these, 22% were customers switching away different - with over 50 suppliers, and the market share of the from the six largest suppliers.4 legacy incumbents’ being reduced to circa 70%. Moreover, suppliers previously thought of as “challengers” or “small Not every new entrant or challenger that has entered the suppliers” have made large acquisitions and/or grown market has been successful. In particular, in 2018 we witnessed significantly. The market is now dominated by Ovo Energy, 14 exits from the market, with Ofgem, the energy regulator, EDF, British Gas, Scottish Power and E.ON. needing to use supply of last resort arrangements for over one million customers.5 Further, a series of acquisitions from Figure 1 provides a chronicle (2005 to 2020) of how the market Octopus Energy (including ENGIE, Co-Operative Energy, structure has changed and how the UK energy retail market Affect Energy and Iresa Energy) have seen their customer base has become one of the most competitive in Europe. The increase to over one million in less than five years.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Results
    Preliminary Results 12 Months Ended 31 December 2014 24 February 2015 Group Structure Biomass Generation Retail Self-supply Markets and Trading Fuel Drax Group plc 2 Agenda Business Review Dorothy Thompson Chief Executive 2014 Financial Review Tony Quinlan Finance Director Biomass Update Dorothy Thompson Drax Group plc 3 2014 Overview Dorothy Thompson – Chief Executive Drax Power EBITDA Good operations Significant regulatory headwinds £229m Major deterioration in commodity markets Underlying Earnings Per Share Haven Power Strong sales growth 23.7p Drax Biomass Total Dividends Commercial operations commence shortly 11.9p/share (£48m) Drax Group plc 4 Safety and Sustainability Safety Safety Performance 0.6 Maintaining good safety performance 2014 Global Coal Power Plant First Quartile TRIR – Solomons LLC 0.5 • > 65% increase in hours worked since 2012 0.4 Sustainability 0.3 All Drax biomass procured against robust 0.2 industry leading sustainability policy 0.1 • Fully compliant in 2014 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 • Delivering > 80% carbon lifecycle savings vs. coal Group TRIR Group LTIR • Thorough PWC independent audit process TRIR = total recordable injury rate, LTIR = lost time injury rate DECC working towards October 2015 mandatory standards Sustainable Biomass Partnership GHG(1) Life Cycle Emissions vs. Fossil Fuels • Industry sustainability standard to be launched Drax GHG Target March 2015 Biomass Gas(3) Coal(4) 2015-2020(2) in 2014 34g 79g 193g 280g CO2/MJ CO2/MJ CO2/MJ CO2/MJ (1) GHG = Green House Gas (2) DECC proposed target (includes
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2005 Sustainable Development 2
    EDF GROUP ANNUAL REPORT 2005 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 2. EDF / Sustainable Development Report 2005 Fundamentals Contents Chairman’s statement 4 Sustainable Development Panel 6 Global Compact principles: EDF initiatives in 2005 8 Commitments and achievements 2005 10 EDF at a glance 14 Renewing and sharing commitments with all stakeholders 16 Working together to fulfill commitments 16 Partnering for results 21 Promoting social responsibility 26 Managing local issues 32 Ensuring safety 32 Minimizing our environmental footprint 34 Ensuring the comfort and safety of local populations 40 Promoting social cohesion and regional development 41 Our planet: rising to long-term challenges 44 Preparing to meet the challenges of the future 44 Fighting global warming and climate change 46 Providing access to energy 52 Taking a more systematic approach to biodiversity 54 Nam Theun: launching a project in sustainable development 56 Glossary 58 3. Structure of the report The EDF Group’s Sustainable Development Report for 2005 is designed to report on Group commitments particularly within its Agenda 21, its ethical charter, and the Global Compact. It has also been prepared with reference to external reference frameworks: the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) guidelines and the French New Economic Regulations (NRE) contained in the May 15, 2001 French law. This report covers only part of the EDF Group’s activities. More information on results and references relating to the EDF Group’s strategy on sustainable development are available on the website www.edf.com. Some general information can also be found in the Annual Report. 4. EDF / Sustainable Development Report 2005 Fundamentals Chairman’s statement Pierre Gadonneix In reviewing 2005, I cannot stress enough just what a crucial year it has been for the EDF Group.
    [Show full text]