DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 69, No. 116/Thursday, June 17, 2004/Rules

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 69, No. 116/Thursday, June 17, 2004/Rules 33840 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 116 / Thursday, June 17, 2004 / Rules and Regulations Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b. notice of proposed rulemaking were as a disposition of the property. withdrawn (REG–138499–02; 69 FR Depreciation for the year of change is § 522.23 [Amended] 9560). No public hearing was requested computed by taking into account the I 2. Section 522.23 is amended in or held. Written or electronic comments applicable convention. No gain, loss, or paragraph (b), introductory text, by responding to the notice of proposed depreciation recapture is recognized removing ‘‘000856 and 059130’’ and by rulemaking were received. After upon the conversion. A commentator adding in its place ‘‘000010, 000856, and consideration of all the comments, the questioned whether recapture of excess 059130’’. proposed regulations are adopted as depreciation under section 280F(b)(2) Dated: May 18, 2004. amended by this Treasury decision. The occurs upon a conversion of listed Andrew J. Beaulieu, revisions are discussed below. property from business use to only personal use. Upon this conversion, the Acting Director, Center for Veterinary Explanation of Provisions Medicine. listed property is not predominantly Scope used in a qualified business use for that [FR Doc. 04–13602 Filed 4–16–04; 8:45 am] taxable year for purposes of section BILLING CODE 4160–01–S The final regulations provide the rules 280F(b) and, consequently, section for determining the annual depreciation 280F(b)(2) requires any excess allowance under section 168 for MACRS depreciation (as defined in section DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY property as a result of a change in the 280F(b)(2)(B)) to be included in gross use of such property. Changes in the use income for the taxable year in which the Internal Revenue Service include a conversion of personal use listed property is converted to personal property to a business or income- use. Accordingly, the IRS and Treasury 26 CFR Part 1 producing use, a conversion of MACRS Department have included a cross- property to personal use, or a change in [TD 9132] reference to section 280F(b)(2) in the the use of MACRS property that results final regulations. RIN 1545–BB05 in a different recovery period, depreciation method, or both. III. MACRS Property—Use Changes Changes in Use Under Section 168(i)(5) After Placed-In-Service Year I. Conversion to Business Use AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), The final regulations provide rules for The final regulations retain the rules Treasury. MACRS property if a change in the use contained in the proposed regulations, of the property occurs after the ACTION: Final and temporary providing that personal use property regulations. property’s placed-in-service year but the converted to business or income- property continues to be MACRS SUMMARY: This document contains final producing use is treated as being placed property in the hands of the taxpayer. and temporary regulations relating to in service by the taxpayer on the date of A. Determination of a change in the the depreciation of property subject to the conversion. Thus, the property is use. The final regulations remain section 168 of the Internal Revenue depreciated by using the applicable unchanged from the proposed Code (MACRS property). Specifically, depreciation method, recovery period, regulations. Consequently, a change in these regulations provide guidance on and convention prescribed under the use of MACRS property generally how to depreciate MACRS property for section 168 for the property beginning occurs when the primary use of the which the use changes in the hands of in the taxable year the change in the use MACRS property in the taxable year is the same taxpayer. The regulations occurs (year of change). No comments different from its primary use in the reflect changes to the law made by the were received suggesting changes to immediately preceding taxable year. Tax Reform Act of 1986. these rules. The final regulations, However, in determining whether a however, clarify that these rules do not taxpayer begins or ceases to use MACRS DATES: Effective Date: These regulations apply when another section of the Code property predominantly outside the are effective June 17, 2004. (or regulations under that section) United States, the predominant use, Applicability Date: For dates of prescribes the depreciation treatment for instead of the primary use, of the applicability, see §§ 1.168(i)–1(l)(2) and a change to business use. For example, MACRS property governs. A 1.168(i)–4(g). if listed property (as defined in section commentator questioned how this FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara 280F(d)(4)) is predominantly used by a predominant use test is applied to Logan or Kathleen Reed, (202) 622–3110 taxpayer in a qualified business use in rolling stock (for example, locomotives, (not a toll-free number). a taxable year, then in a subsequent freight and passenger train cars) that is SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: taxable year is exclusively used by the not described under section 168(g)(4)(B) taxpayer for personal purposes, and and that is used within and without the Background then in a later taxable year is United States. This question concerns This document contains amendments predominantly used by the taxpayer in how to trace the movement of this to 26 CFR part 1. On July 21, 2003, the a qualified business use, section rolling stock to determine its physical IRS and Treasury Department published 280F(b)(2)(A) requires that the property location, which the IRS and Treasury a notice of proposed rulemaking in the be depreciated under the alternative Department believe is beyond the scope Federal Register (REG–138499–02; 68 depreciation system of section 168(g) in of these regulations. FR 43047), relating to a change in the the later taxable year and subsequent B. Change in the use of MACRS use of MACRS property in the hands of taxable years. property resulting in a different recovery the same taxpayer (change in the use) period and/or depreciation method. The under section 168(i)(5) of the Internal II. Conversion to Personal Use final regulations retain the rules Revenue Code (Code) and relating to a The final regulations retain the rule contained in the proposed regulations change in the use of assets in a general contained in the proposed regulations for determining the applicable asset account under section 168(i)(4). providing that a conversion of MACRS depreciation method, recovery period, On March 1, 2004, §§ 1.168(a)–1 and property from business or income- and convention used to determine the 1.168(b)–1 that were contained in this producing use to personal use is treated depreciation allowances for the MACRS VerDate jul<14>2003 15:24 Jun 16, 2004 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17JNR1.SGM 17JNR1 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 116 / Thursday, June 17, 2004 / Rules and Regulations 33841 property for the year of change and may elect to disregard the change in the after June 17, 2004. For any change in subsequent taxable years. Consequently, use and determine the depreciation the use of MACRS property after if a change in the use of MACRS allowances as though the change in the December 31, 1986, in a taxable year property results in a shorter recovery use had not occurred. As a result, the ending before June 17, 2004, the IRS period and/or a more accelerated final regulations do not require a will allow any reasonable method of depreciation method (for example, recovery period that is longer than the depreciating the property under section MACRS property ceases to be used recovery period applicable for the 168 in the year of change and the predominantly outside the United MACRS property in the taxable year subsequent taxable years that is States), the adjusted depreciable basis of immediately preceding the year of consistently applied to the MACRS the MACRS property as of the beginning change. Accordingly, the commentator’s property for which the use changes in of the year of change is depreciated over suggestion was not accepted. the hands of the same taxpayer. the shorter recovery period and/or by Another commentator requested that However, a taxpayer may choose, on a the more accelerated depreciation Example 4 in § 1.168(i)–5(d)(6) be property-by-property basis, to apply the method beginning with the year of clarified by stating which optional final regulations to a change in the use change as though the MACRS property depreciation tables the transaction of MACRS property after December 31, is placed in service by the taxpayer in coefficient factors are drawn from. The 1986, in a taxable year ending before the year of change. If a change in the use IRS and Treasury Department have June 17, 2004. In this case and of MACRS property results in a longer adopted this suggestion. consistent with Chief Counsel Notice 2004–007, Change in Litigating recovery period and/or a slower IV. Change in the Use During the Position—Application of Section 446(e) depreciation method (for example, Placed-in-Service Year MACRS property begins to be used to Changes in Computing Depreciation predominantly outside the United The final regulations retain the rules (CC–2004–007, January 28, 2004, at the States), the adjusted depreciable basis of contained in the proposed regulations if IRS Internet site at www.irs.gov/foia), a the MACRS property as of the beginning a change in the use of MACRS property change to the method of accounting for of the year of change is depreciated over occurs during the taxable year the depreciation provided in the final the longer recovery period and/or by the property is placed in service and the regulations due to a change in the use slower depreciation method beginning property continues to be MACRS of MACRS property in a taxable year with the year of change as though the property in the hands of the taxpayer.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Depreciation Recovery Periods and Methods
    Report to The Congress on Depreciation Recovery Periods and Methods Department of the Treasury July 2000 July 282000 The Honorable Bill Archer Chairman Committee on Ways and Means House of Representatives Washington, DC 205 15 Dear Mr. Chairman: Section 2022 of P.L. 105-277, the Tax and Trade Relief Extension Act of 1998 (the 1998 Act), directed the Secretary of the Treasury to conduct a comprehensive study of the recovery periods and depreciation methods under section 168 of the Internal Revenue Code and to provide recommendations for determining those periods in a more rational manner. The 1998 Act directed the Secretary to submit the results of the study and recommendations to the House Committee on Ways and Means and the Senate Finance Committee by March 3 1,200O. Pursuant to that directive, I hereby submit the “Report to the Congress on Depreciation Recovery Periods and Methods.” I am sending a similar letter to Senator William V. Roth, Jr., Chairman of the Committee on Finance, Senator Daniel P. Moynihan, and Representative Charles B. Rangel. Sincerely, Jonathan Talisman Acting Assistant Secretary Tax Policy Encl.osure L July 28,200O The Honorable William V. Roth, Jr. Chairman Committee on Finance United States Senate Washington, DC 205 10 Dear Mr. Chairman: Section 2022 of P.L. 105-277, the Tax and Trade Relief Extension Act of 1998 (the 1998 Act), directed the Secretary of the Treasury to conduct a comprehensive study of the recovery periods and depreciation methods under section 168 of the Internal Revenue Code and to provide recommendations for determining those periods in a more rational manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Reemployment of Retired Members: Federal Tax Issues
    MARYLAND STATE RETIREMENT AND PENSION SYSTEM REEMPLOYMENT OF RETIRED MEMBERS - FEDERAL TAX ISSUES There are two key tax issues related to the reemployment of individuals by the State or participating governmental units who are retirees of the Maryland State Retirement and Pension System: (1) the tax qualification of the plans under the Maryland State Retirement and Pension System; and (2) the possibility of the imposition of the 10% early distribution tax on benefits received by retirees. The following information is provided in order that State and participating employers may better understand the rules. 1. PLAN QUALIFICATION – A defined benefit retirement plan, such as the plans under the Maryland State Retirement and Pension Plan, must meet many requirements under the Internal Revenue Code in order to be a “qualified plan” under the Code and receive certain important tax advantages. One of those requirements provides that, in general, a member may not withdraw contributions made by the employer, or earnings on such contributions, before normal retirement, termination of employment, or termination of the plan. Rev. Rul. 74-254, 1974-1 C.B. 94. “Normal retirement age cannot be earlier than the earliest age that is reasonably representative of a typical retirement age for the covered workforce.” Prop. Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.401(a) – 1(b)(1)(i). A retirement age that is lower than 65 is permissible for a governmental plan if it reflects when employees typically retire and is not a subterfuge for permitting in-service distributions. PLR 200420030. Therefore, as a matter of plan qualification, retirement benefits may be paid to an employee who reaches “normal retirement age” once the employee retires and separates from service, and the reemployment of such a retiree by the same employer should not raise concerns regarding plan qualification.
    [Show full text]
  • Sage Fixed Assets Depreciation Fundamentals 2017.1
    Sage Fixed Assets Depreciation Fundamentals 2017.1 User guide January 2017 Last updated: December 19, 2016 © 2017 The Sage Group plc or its licensors. All rights reserved. Sage, Sage logos, and Sage product and service names mentioned herein are the trademarks of The Sage Group plc or its licensors. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Sage End User License Agreement (EULA): http://na.sage.com/sage-na/eula Sage Fixed Assets Depreciation Fundamentals Contents Section 1:Introduction: Features and More Features... 1-i Section 1:Preface: Historical Overview 1-i A History of Depreciation . 1-vii Section I: Fundamentals of Depreciation I-1 What Are Fixed Assets? . I-1 Who May Claim Depreciation? . I-2 What Property May Be Depreciated? . I-2 Additional Expenditures . I-4 Financial Reporting . I-4 Elements of Depreciation . I-7 Tax Reporting . I-7 Type of Property . I-10 The Date Placed in Service . I-11 Estimated Useful Life . I-12 Depreciable Basis . I-12 Basis Used for Depreciation . I-12 Trade-ins and Basis . I-14 Miscellaneous Basis Issues . I-18 Multiple Depreciation Calculations: An Overview . I-19 Section II: Amortization II-1 Amortization of Property for Financial Reporting Purposes . II-2 Computer Software . II-2 Copyrights . II-3 Covenants-Not-To-Compete . II-3 Customer Lists . II-3 Easements . II-3 Franchises . II-4 Sage Fixed Assets - Depreciation Fundamentals Contents-1 Contents Goodwill . II-4 Leasehold Improvements . II-4 Organization Costs . II-4 Patents . II-5 Research and Development Costs . II-5 Trademarks and Trade Names . II-5 Amortization of Property for Tax Reporting Purposes .
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Reform in the 113Th Congress: an Overview of Proposals
    Tax Reform in the 113th Congress: An Overview of Proposals Molly F. Sherlock Specialist in Public Finance March 24, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R43060 Tax Reform in the 113th Congress: An Overview of Proposals Summary Many agree that the U.S. tax system is in need of substantial reforms. The 113th Congress continues to explore ways to make the U.S. tax system simpler, fairer, and more efficient. Identifying and enacting policies that will result in a simpler, fairer, and more efficient tax system remains a challenge. On February 26, 2014, House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp released a comprehensive tax reform discussion draft, the Tax Reform Act of 2014. This draft proposes substantial changes to both the individual and corporate income tax systems, reducing statutory tax rates for many taxpayers, while repealing dozens of credits, deductions, and other tax preferences. The Tax Reform Act of 2014 builds on previously released discussion drafts related to international tax, financial products, and small business. Earlier in the 113th Congress, former Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus released several tax reform discussion drafts, addressing international tax, cost recovery, tax administration, and energy tax policy. Other legislation has been introduced in the 113th Congress that would fundamentally change the U.S. federal tax system. The Fair Tax Act of 2013 (H.R. 25/S. 122) would replace most current federal taxes with a 23% national retail sales tax. Other proposals would establish a flat tax, where individuals would be taxed on wages and businesses taxed on cash flows (see the Flat Tax Act (H.R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fairtax Treatment of Housing
    A FairTaxsm White Paper The FairTax treatment of housing Advocates of tax reform share a common motivation: To iron out the mangled economic incentives resulting from statutory inequities and misguided social engineering that perversely cripple the American economy and the American people. Most importantly, ironing out the statutory inequities of the federal tax code need not harm homebuyers and homebuilders. The FairTax does more than do no harm. The FairTax encourages home ownership and homebuilding by placing all Americans and all businesses on equal footing – no loopholes, no exceptions. A specific analysis of the impact of the FairTax on the homebuilding industry/the housing market shows that the new homebuilding market would greatly benefit from enactment of the FairTax. The analysis necessarily centers upon two issues: (1) Whether the FairTax’s elimination of the home mortgage interest deduction (MID) adversely impacts the housing market (new and existing) in general, and home ownership and the homebuilding industry specifically; and (2) Whether the FairTax’s superficially disparate treatment of new vs. existing housing has an adverse impact on the market for new homes and homebuilding. The response to both of the above questions is no. Visceral opposition to the repeal of a “good loophole” such as the MID is understandable, absent a more thorough and empirical analysis of the impact of the FairTax vs. the MID on home ownership and the homebuilding industry. Such an analysis demonstrates that preserving the MID is the classic instance of a situation where the business community confuses support for particular businesses with support for enterprise in general.
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Individual Retirement Arrangements (Iras)
    (6-2010) TRADITIONAL INDIVIDUAL RETIREMENT ARRANGEMENTS (Traditional IRAs) List of Required Modifications and Information Package (LRMs) (For use with prototype traditional IRAs intending to satisfy the requirements of Code § 408(a) or (b).) Material added since the 3-2002 LRMs is underlined. This information package contains samples of provisions that have been found to satisfy certain specific requirements of the Internal Revenue Code as amended through the Worker, Retiree, and Employer Recovery Act of 2008 (“WRERA”), Pub. L. 110-458. Such language may or may not be acceptable in specific IRAs, depending on the context. We have prepared this package to assist sponsors who are drafting IRAs. To expedite the review process, sponsors are encouraged to use the language contained in this package. Part A, provisions 1-12, applies to individual retirement accounts under Code § 408(a). Part B, provisions 13-22, applies to individual retirement annuities under § 408(b). ________________________________________________________________ PART A: ACCOUNTS - Trust or custodial accounts under Code § 408(a). (1) Statement of Requirement: The IRA is organized and operated for the exclusive benefit of the individual, Code § 408(a). Sample Language: The account is established for the exclusive benefit of the individual or his or her beneficiaries. If this is an inherited IRA within the meaning of Code § 408(d)(3)(C) maintained for the benefit of a designated beneficiary of a deceased individual, references in this document to the “individual” are to the deceased individual. (2) Statement of Requirement: Maximum permissible annual contribution and restrictions on kinds of contributions, Code §§ 72(t)(2)(G), 219(b), 408(a)(1), 408(d)(3)(C), 408(d)(3)(G), 1 408(p)(1)(B) and 408(p)(2)(A)(iv).
    [Show full text]
  • Section 501 on the Ground That All of Its Profits Are Payable to One Or More Organizations Exempt from Taxation Under Section 501
    F. IRC 502 - FEEDER ORGANIZATIONS 1. Introduction An organization described in IRC 502 does not qualify for exemption under any paragraph of IRC 501(c). The purpose of this article is to discuss some of the basic issues presented by IRC 502, to explain how it should be interpreted and applied, and to consider the amount of unrelated business activity that an exempt charitable organization may engage in. IRC 502 provides that an organization operated for the primary purpose of carrying on a trade or business for profit shall not be exempt under IRC 501 on the ground that all of its profits are payable to one or more organizations exempt under IRC 501. 2. Purpose of Feeder Provisions A brief consideration of the reasons for the enactment of IRC 502 provides some insight as to how it should be interpreted. There was growing concern, particularly after World War II, about the increasing amount of business activities carried on by exempt organizations, particularly, charitable organizations. In a series of cases involving taxable years prior to 1951, certain organizations popularly called "feeder organizations" were held exempt from federal income tax under the predecessor to IRC 501(c)(3), even though their sole activity was engaging in commercial business, and the only basis for exemption was the fact their profits were payable to specified exempt organizations. See Roche's Beach, Inc. v. Commissioner, 96 F. 2d 776 (1938); C. F. Mueller Company v. Commissioner, 190 F. 2d 120 (1951). The courts held that the exclusive purpose required by the statute was met when the only object of the organization was religious, scientific, charitable, or educational, without regard to the method of obtaining funds necessary to effectuate the objective.
    [Show full text]
  • Home Workers and the Debate Over "Who's a Statutory Employee" Under the Internal Revenue Code
    HOME WORKERS AND THE DEBATE OVER "WHO'S A STATUTORY EMPLOYEE" UNDER THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE ROBERT \V VVOOD ANI) CIlIUSTOPIiER A. KARACIIALE ifferent governmental agencies use different tests for determining who is <1n D employee and who is not. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) typically uses one test,' the Department of Labor and many employment statutes use another,2 and most state unemployment insurance authorities use another stil\.3 This creates ROBERT W. WOOD CHRISTOPHER A. /?OIlERT W WOOD I'UACT/CI,S KARACHALE a great deal of confusion about what should be a relatively simple question-is a LAW WITH WOOD & POUTEU CIIIUSTOPIIEU KAUACHALE IN SAN FUANCISCO (WWW. /S ,IN ASSOCIATE AT Woov & worker an employee or an independent contractor' WOO DPOUTFU.COM) ANI) IS POUTFU IN SAN FUANCISCO. THE AUTllOU OF TAXATION HI-"Af)VISES INDIVI DUALS AND The test for employee status generally used by the IRS looks to the employer's OF DAMAGE AWAIU)S ANI) IJUSINI;'SS ENTI'I'IESONAHROAD behavioral and financial controls over the worker, as well as the relationship between SETTLEMENT PAYMENTS (4T/-1 IIANGE OF TAX PUNNING AND ED. TAX INSTITUTE, 2009) TAX CONTROVEUSY MATTERS, the parties. This "twenty-factor test" is an uncodified,amorphous, facts and circum­ AND QUAIIFIFD SETTLEMENT INCI UDING TI-"'" TAXATION FUNDS AND SECTION 468/l OF I),IMAGE AI,VAIIVS AND stances test that, like many of the other tests, tends to provide uneven results. Never­ (TAX INSTI TUTE, 2009), DEFEUllliD COMPENS ATION, HOTH AVA/tABLE AT WWW. INIJHPFNVJ:NT C:ONTR ACTOU theless, for more than 50 years, the Internal Revenue Code has contained a narrowly TAX1NS TITUTE.COM.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Recent Tax Reform Proposals
    An Overview of Recent Tax Reform Proposals Mark P. Keightley Specialist in Economics February 28, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R44771 An Overview of Recent Tax Reform Proposals Summary Many agree that the U.S. tax system is in need of reform. Congress continues to explore ways to make the U.S. tax system simpler, fairer, and more efficient. In doing so, lawmakers confront challenges in identifying and enacting policies, including consideration of competing proposals and differing priorities. To assist Congress as it continues to debate the intricacies of tax reform, this report provides a review of legislative tax reform proposals introduced since the 113th Congress. Although no comprehensive tax reforms have been introduced into legislation yet in the 115th Congress, two 2016 reform proposals appear to be at the forefront of current congressional debates—the House GOP’s “A Better Way” tax reform proposal, released in June 2016, and President Trump’s campaign reform proposal, released in September 2016. As with most recent tax reform proposals, both of these plans call for lower tax rates coupled with a broader tax base. In either case, numerous technical details would need to be addressed before either plan could be formulated into legislation. Several proposals have already been introduced in the 115th Congress to replace the current income tax system. The Fair Tax Act of 2017 (H.R. 25/S. 18) would repeal the individual income tax, the corporate income tax, all payroll taxes, the self-employment tax, and the estate and gift taxes. These taxes would be effectively replaced with a 23% (tax-inclusive, meaning that the rate is a proportion of the after-tax rather than the pre-tax value) national retail sales tax.
    [Show full text]
  • Form 4506-C, IVES Request for Transcript of Tax Return
    Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service Form 4506-C OMB Number (September 2020) IVES Request for Transcript of Tax Return 1545-1872 ▶ Do not sign this form unless all applicable lines have been completed. ▶ Request may be rejected if the form is incomplete or illegible. ▶ For more information about Form 4506-C, visit www.irs.gov and search IVES. 1a. Name shown on tax return (if a joint return, enter the name shown 1b. First social security number on tax return, individual taxpayer identification first) number, or employer identification number (see instructions) 2a. If a joint return, enter spouse’s name shown on tax return 2b. Second social security number or individual taxpayer identification number if joint tax return 3. Current name, address (including apt., room, or suite no.), city, state, and ZIP code (see instructions) 4. Previous address shown on the last return filed if different from line 3 (see instructions) 5a. IVES participant name, address, and SOR mailbox ID 5b. Customer file number (if applicable) (see instructions) Caution: This tax transcript is being sent to the third party entered on Line 5a. Ensure that lines 5 through 8 are completed before signing. (see instructions) 6. Transcript requested. Enter the tax form number here (1040, 1065, 1120, etc.) and check the appropriate box below. Enter only one tax form number per request a. Return Transcript, which includes most of the line items of a tax return as filed with the IRS. A tax return transcript does not reflect changes made to the account after the return is processed.
    [Show full text]
  • Additional First-Year Depreciation Allowance. 40.60(1) Assets Acquired After September 10, 2001, but Before May 6, 2003
    IAC Ch 40, p.1 701—40.60 (422) Additional first-year depreciation allowance. 40.60(1) Assets acquired after September 10, 2001, but before May 6, 2003. For tax periods ending after September 10, 2001, but beginning before May 6, 2003, the additional first-year depreciation allowance (“bonus depreciation”) of 30 percent authorized in Section 168(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, as enacted by Public Law No. 107-147, Section 101, does not apply for Iowa individual income tax. Taxpayers who claim the bonus depreciation on their federal income tax return must add the total amount of depreciation claimed on assets acquired after September 10, 2001, but before May 6, 2003, and subtract the amount of depreciation taken on such property using the modified accelerated cost recovery system (MACRS) depreciation method applicable under Section 168 of the Internal Revenue Code without regard to Section 168(k). If any such property was sold or disposed of during the tax year, the applicable depreciation catch-up adjustment must be made to adjust the basis of the property for Iowa tax purposes. The gain or loss reported on the sale or disposition of these assets for federal tax purposes must be adjusted for Iowa tax purposes to account for the adjusted basis of assets. The adjustment for both depreciation and the gain or loss on the sale of qualifying assets acquired after September 10, 2001, but before May 6, 2003, can be calculated on Form IA 4562A. See 701—subrule 53.22(1) for examples illustrating how this subrule is applied.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 3158 TITLE 26—INTERNAL REVENUE CODE § 6101
    § 6101 TITLE 26—INTERNAL REVENUE CODE Page 3158 6107. Tax return preparer must furnish copy of re- (Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 753; Pub. L. turn to taxpayer and must retain a copy or 94–455, title XIX, § 1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 list. Stat. 1834.) 6108. Publication of statistics of income.2 6109. Identifying numbers. AMENDMENTS 6110. Public inspection of written determinations. 1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out ‘‘or his delegate’’ after 6111. Disclosure of reportable transactions. ‘‘Secretary’’. 6112. Material advisors of reportable transactions must keep lists of advisees, etc. § 6102. Computations on returns or other docu- 6113. Disclosure of nondeductibility of contribu- ments tions. 6114. Treaty-based return positions. (a) Amounts shown on internal revenue forms 6115. Disclosure related to quid pro quo contribu- The Secretary is authorized to provide with tions. 6116. Requirement for prisons located in United respect to any amount required to be shown on States to provide information for tax ad- a form prescribed for any internal revenue re- ministration. turn, statement, or other document, that if such 6117. Cross reference. amount of such item is other than a whole-dol- lar amount, either— AMENDMENTS (1) the fractional part of a dollar shall be 2011—Pub. L. 112–41, title V, § 502(b), Oct. 21, 2011, 125 disregarded; or Stat. 460, added items 6116 and 6117 and struck out (2) the fractional part of a dollar shall be former item 6116 ‘‘Cross reference’’. 2007—Pub. L. 110–28, title VIII, § 8246(a)(2)(C)(ii), May disregarded unless it amounts to one-half dol- 25, 2007, 121 Stat.
    [Show full text]