Charles County Maryland

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Charles County Maryland CHARLES COUNTY MARYLAND COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 This page left intentionally blank CHARLES COUNTY, MARYLAND COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 Prepared by: Department of Fiscal and Administrative Services Charles County, Maryland Jenifer M. Ellin Director of Fiscal & Administrative Services William G. DeAtley Chief of Accounting Joan T. Thorp, CPA Assistant Chief of Accounting Mark Belton County Administrator www. charlescountymd.gov The County Commissioners of Charles County, Maryland Table of Contents Contents Introductory Section ...................................................................................................................... 1 Letter of Transmittal .................................................................................................................. 3 Government Finance Officers Certificate of Achievement .................................................... 13 Listing of Elected and Appointed Officials .............................................................................. 14 Organizational Chart ................................................................................................................. 15 Charles County Location Map .................................................................................................. 16 Mission and Vision Statements ................................................................................................ 17 Financial Section ........................................................................................................................... 19 Report of Independent Public Accountants ........................................................................... 21 Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) .................................................................. 24 Basic Financial Statements .......................................................................................................37 Government-wide Financial Statements ............................................................................ 38 Statement of Net Position ............................................................................................... 38 Statement of Activities .................................................................................................... 40 Fund Financial Statements .................................................................................................. 42 Governmental Fund Financial Statements ..................................................................... 42 Balance Sheet ............................................................................................................... 42 Reconciliation of Total Governmental Fund Balance to Net Position of Governmental Activities .............................................................................................. 43 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance .................... 44 Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities .............................. 45 Proprietary Fund Financial Statements .............................................................................. 46 Statement of Net Position ........................................................................................... 46 Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position ............................ 47 Statement of Cash Flows ............................................................................................. 48 Fiduciary Fund Financial Statements .................................................................................. 50 Statement of Fiduciary Net Position ............................................................................... 50 Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position ............................................................ 51 Component Unit Financial Statements............................................................................... 53 Combining Statement of Net Position ............................................................................ 53 Combining Statement of Activities ................................................................................. 54 Index: Notes of the F/S ........................................................................................................ 57 Notes to the Financial Statements ..................................................................................... 59 Required Supplementary Information ................................................................................... 117 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance: Budgetary (Non- GAAP) to Actual - General Fund ......................................................................................... 118 Schedule of County's Retirement Plan Employer Contributions ..................................... 119 Schedule of Changes in County's Retirement Plan Net Pension Liability & Related Ratios .............................................................................................................................................. 120 Schedule of Sheriff's Office Retirement Plan Employer Contributions ............................ 121 Schedule of Changes in Sheriff's Office Retirement Net Pension Liability & Related Ratios ................................................................................................................................... 122 Schedule of the OPEB Plan Employer Contributions ........................................................ 123 Schedule of Changes in the County’s Proportionate Share of the Net OPEB Liability & Related Ratios ..................................................................................................................... 124 Schedule of Changes in the County’s LOSAP Plan Pension Liability................................ 125 Schedules and Combining Statements .................................................................................. 127 General Fund ....................................................................................................................... 129 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance Budgetary (Non- GAAP) Basis to Actual - General Fund ............................................................................130 Schedule of Expenditures and Other Financing Uses – Budgetary (Non-GAAP) Basis to Actual - General Fund....................................................................................................... 134 Special Revenue Funds ....................................................................................................... 137 Combining Balance Sheet ............................................................................................... 138 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position ............. 141 Enterprise Funds ................................................................................................................. 144 Combining Statement of Net Position ........................................................................... 146 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position ............. 147 Combining Statement of Cash Flows ............................................................................. 148 Fiduciary & Trust Funds ....................................................................................................... 151 Combining Statement of Fiduciary Net Position ........................................................... 152 Combining Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position ....................................... 153 Statistical Section ....................................................................................................................... 155 Financial Trend Information ................................................................................... 156 Table 1 Net Position by Component ............................................................................... 156 Table 2 Changes in Net Position ...................................................................................... 158 Table 3 Fund Balances of Governmental Funds ............................................................. 162 Table 4 Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds .......................................... 164 Revenue Capacity Information .............................................................................. 166 Table 5 Assessed Value and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property ................... 166 Table 6 Property Tax Rates for Direct and Overlapping Governments ........................ 167 Table 7 Principal Taxpayers ............................................................................................. 168 Table 8 Property Tax Levies and Collections .................................................................. 169 Debt Capacity Information ..................................................................................... 170 Table 9 Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type ................................................................. 170 Table 10 Ratios of General Bonded Debt Outstanding .................................................... 171 Table 11 Direct and Overlapping Debt: Governmental Activities ................................... 172 Table 12 Legal Debt Margin
Recommended publications
  • ORDER NO. 1156 ---Authorize a Change in Its Route C. the Change
    WASHINGTON METROPOLITA AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 1156 IN THE MATTER OF: Served July 23, 1971 Application of WMA Transit ) Application No. 699 Company for Amendment of WMATC Certificate of Public ) Convenience and Necessity ) No. 8 to Change Its Route C. ) By Application No. 699 filed May 21, 1971, WMA Transit Company (WMA) sought amendment of its Certifi- cate of Public Convenience and Necessity No. 8 to ----authorize a change in its Route C. The change was requested by the Prince George's County Police Depart- ment and would entail discontinuing service over 24th Avenue and Iverson Street, and replacing it with service over 23rd parkway in Hillcrest Heights, Maryland. .. A survey of passengers affected showed a majority favored the rerouting. In addition, the applied-for --route appears to be safer and more conducive to bus operations as 23rd Parkway is a divided road. No com- munications opposing the proposed rerouting have been received by the Commission following full public notice. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED: 1. That Application No. 699 be, and it is hereby, granted. 2. That the WMATC Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity No. 8 be, and it is hereby, amended incor- porating third revised page 3 cancelling second revised page 3 as attached hereto and made a part hereof. BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION: DO UGL N. S CHNE IDER , Executive Director t (A0 I CERT. NO. 8 No. 7 From Washington, D. C., over city streets to Southern Avenue, thence over Maryland Route 5, Curtis Drive, 28th Parkway, 27th Avenue, Berkley Street, 23rd Parkway, Kenton Place, St.
    [Show full text]
  • FY22-FY26 GG CIP.Xlsx
    CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY2022-FY2026 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # GOVERNMENTAL PROJECTS APPROVED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BOARD OF EDUCATION Benjamin Stoddert Middle School - Modernization/Addition 1 McDonough High School Renovation Study / Security Enhancements & Performing Arts 2 Westlake H.S. Roof Replacement 3 Indian Head E.S. Boiler Replacement 4 Smallwood M.S. Roof/Chiller/H&V/UV Replacement 5 BOE: Various Maintenance Projects 6 Local Portable Classrooms - Various Schools 7 Limited Renovation: Dr. Gustavus Brown E.S. 8 T.C. Martin Elementary School Study/Renovation/Addition 9 Piccowaxen M.S. Boiler Replacement 10 Elementary School #23 11 Full Day Kindergarten Addition: Walter J. Mitchell E.S. 12 Full Day Kindergarten Addition: J.C. Parks E.S. 13 Full Day Kindergarten Addition: Wade E.S. 14 Full Day Kindergarten Addition: Dr. Higdon E.S. 15 La Plata High School - Renovation- Security Enhancements and Circulation Upgrades 16 Mary H. Matula Elementary - Roof Replacement 17 Mattawoman MS - Roof Replacement 18 Middle School #9 19 COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN MARYLAND Health Technology Renovation 20 Waste Water Treatment Plant Replacement 21 GENERAL GOVERNMENT Rural Legacy Program 22 Agricultural Preservation 23 Purchase of Developments Rights (PDR) Program 24 Various Maintenance Projects 25 Generator Replacement Program 26 Detention Center Pump Station Rehabilitations 27 Charles County Animal Shelter 28 Radio Communications System Upgrade 29 Charles County VanGO Maintenance Facility 30 La Plata Library Relocation 31 Blue Crabs Stadium Maintenance
    [Show full text]
  • School Boundary Advisory Committee
    School Boundary Advisory Committee Board of Education of St. Mary’s County February 11, 2015 1 School Boundary Advisory Committee Second New Elementary School (2014 – 2015) Redistricting Policy - JCAA I. Purpose The purpose of this policy is to provide for the realignment of school district boundaries as a result of new school construction, overcrowding at existing schools, or closing existing schools. II. Policy Statement Section 4-109 (c) of the Education Article, Maryland Annotated Code provides that: With the advice of the Superintendent of Schools, the Board of Education of St. Mary’s County (the Board) shall determine the geographic attendance area for each school established under this section. In accordance with 13A.02.09 of the Code of Maryland Regulations, St. Mary’s County Public Schools hereby adopts the following policy to be applied to the redistricting and closing of schools. 1. The Board has the primary responsibility to provide school facilities that address changing enrollment patterns and that sustain high quality educational programs and equitable educational opportunities in a way that meets its instructional expectations. The Board fulfills this responsibility through the facilities planning process. The academic achievement of all students in a safe and orderly learning environment through partnership with our community is of primary importance to the Superintendent of Schools and the Board. Enrollment in St. Mary’s County is not static. The fundamental basis of this policy is to provide a sound educational environment for a changing and growing community. The number of students, their geographic distribution, and demographic characteristics of this population are all a concern for the public school system.
    [Show full text]
  • Hogan Highlights Progress on Maryland Route 5 in Brandywine
    Hogan Highlights Progress on Maryland Route 5 in Brandywine Posted by TBNDavid On 06/26/2017 BRANDYWINE, MD – One of the record number of road projects happening across the state this summer has reached a construction milestone. The $55.7 million project at the MD 5 (Branch Avenue) interchange with MD 373 (Accokeek Road) and MD 381 (Brandywine Road) in Brandywine began last summer and is now one-third complete with construction of the Spine Road overpass underway. This project is one of the prime examples of Governor Larry Hogan’s commitment to bring congestion relief to Maryland and will result in a safer commute for thousands of residents in Charles County and southern Prince George’s County. “Our administration promised to fix Maryland’s crumbling roads and bridges, as well address the worst traffic in the nation, and with the MD 5 interchange project, we are doing exactly what we said we would do,” said Governor Larry Hogan. “This important project will help remove a major bottleneck in Prince George’s County and ensure safer and more efficient travelling for our citizens.” Today, MD 5 carries three lanes in each direction and is divided by a median. During morning and evening rush hours, drivers experience delays at two congested intersections – Accokeek and Livingston roads – which directly connect to neighboring communities. Construction crews recently began primary construction of the Spine Road overpass, which will connect two new service roads on each side of Branch Avenue. Pile driving for the new bridge began this month, in conjunction with waterline installation on both sides of MD 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Unreported in the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland ______
    UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND ______________________________________ Nos. 1016, 1017, and 1019 No. 1061 September Term, 2014 September Term, 2014 Frank Bazzarre et al. Robin Dale Land, LLC v. v. County Council of Prince George’s County Council of Prince George’s County County Maryland, Maryland, Sitting as the District Council, et al. Sitting as the District Council No. 1023 No. 1062 September Term, 2014 September Term, 2014 Christmas Farm, LLC ERCO Properties, Inc. v. v. County Council of Prince George’s County Council of Prince George’s County County Maryland, Maryland, Sitting as the District Council Sitting as the District Council No. 1024 No. 1426 September Term, 2014 September Term, 2014 MCQ Auto Servicecenter, Inc. Piscataway Road-Clinton MD, LLC v. v. County Council of Prince George's County Council of Prince George’s County County Maryland, Maryland, Sitting as the District Council Sitting as the District Council ________________________________________________________________________ Kehoe, Leahy, Kenney, James A., III, (Senior Judge, Specially Assigned), JJ. _____________________________________________________________________________ _ Opinion by Kehoe, J. ________________________________________________________________________ Filed: May 30, 2017 *This is an unreported opinion, and it may not be cited in any paper, brief, motion, or other document filed in this Court or any other Maryland Court as either precedent within the rule of stare decisis or as persuasive authority. Md. Rule 1-104. –– Unreported Opinion –– _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Contents Introduction Part 1. An Abbreviated Statutory Overview A. The Regional District Act B. The Prince George’s County Code C. The Maryland Public Ethics Law Part 2. Factual and Procedural Background A. General Overview B. Subsequent Proceedings Before the District Council and the Planning Board C.
    [Show full text]
  • CH-195 Oakland, (Morton's Mill Farm)
    CH-195 Oakland, (Morton's Mill Farm) Architectural Survey File This is the architectural survey file for this MIHP record. The survey file is organized reverse- chronological (that is, with the latest material on top). It contains all MIHP inventory forms, National Register nomination forms, determinations of eligibility (DOE) forms, and accompanying documentation such as photographs and maps. Users should be aware that additional undigitized material about this property may be found in on-site architectural reports, copies of HABS/HAER or other documentation, drawings, and the “vertical files” at the MHT Library in Crownsville. The vertical files may include newspaper clippings, field notes, draft versions of forms and architectural reports, photographs, maps, and drawings. Researchers who need a thorough understanding of this property should plan to visit the MHT Library as part of their research project; look at the MHT web site (mht.maryland.gov) for details about how to make an appointment. All material is property of the Maryland Historical Trust. Last Updated: 12-18-2012 ( FHR-t»30C (11 78) I CH—195 United States Department of the interior Neritcge Conservation and Recreation Service For HCRS use only National Register of Historic Places -received Inventory—Nomination Form entered See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries—complete applicable sections 1. Name historic Morton's Mill Farm; Oakland (preferred) and or common Oakland 2. Location street & number Maryland Route 5 (Waldorf Leonardtown Road) _Z_ not for publication city, town Bryantovm _X_ vicinity of congressional district First state Maryland code 24 county Charles code 017 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoning Map Amendment A-9970 Application General Data
    The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George's County Planning Department Development Review Division 301-952-3530 Note: Staff reports can be accessed at www.mncppc.org/pgco/planning/plan.htm. Zoning Map Amendment A-9970 Application General Data Project Name: Date Accepted: 4/18/05 Renard Lakes N/A Planning Board Action Limit: Plan Acreage: 167.84 Location: Zone: I-1 Northwest corner of US 301 and Dyson Road, Dwelling Units: 429 known as 12401 Southwest Crain Highway. Square Footage: N/A Applicant/Address: Planning Area: 85A SCAD, LLC Tier: Developing 5450 Branchville Road 09 Branchville, Maryland 20740 Council District: Municipality: N/A 200-Scale Base Map: 216SE08 Purpose of Application Notice Dates Rezoning from I-1 Light Industrial) to R-S Adjoining Property Owners (Residential Suburban 2.7) Comprehensive Design Previous Parties of Record 3/3/05 Zone Registered Associations: (CB-12-2003) Sign(s) Posted on Site and 9/29/05 Notice of Hearing Mailed: Staff Recommendation Staff Reviewer: Jimi Jones APPROVAL WITH APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL DISCUSSION CONDITIONS X October 12, 2005 TECHNICAL STAFF REPORT: TO: The Prince George’s County Planning Board The Prince George’s County District Council FROM: Jimi Jones, Acting Zoning Supervisor SUBJECT: Zoning Application No. A-9970 Amendment of Zoning Map (A-9970) REQUEST: Zoning Map Amendment to rezone the subject property from the existing I-1 (Light Industrial) Zone to R-S 2.7-3.5 (Residential Suburban) Zone, a Comprehensive Design Zone (CDZ) RECOMMENDATION: DISAPPROVAL NOTE: The Planning Board has scheduled this application for a public hearing on the agenda date indicated above.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release
    News Release For Immediate Release Contacts: John Undeland, WWB Project June 5, 2006 703/329-0300 or 571-237-2690 (cell) Michelle Holland, WWB Project 703/329-0300 or 703/930-7286 (cell) Media Access/Availability Friday-Saturday-Sunday Call in Advance to Schedule Interviews NEW WILSON BRIDGE OPENS TO FIRST TRAFFIC THIS WEEKEND Major Traffic Delays Anticipated Over Weekend (June 9-12) as I-95 North Traffic is Switched onto New Bridge I-95 North (Beltway Outer Loop) Reduced to Single Lane for Up To Four Miles; Continued Night-time Closures On Weekend of I-95 North and South at MD 210 Oxon Hill, Md./Alexandria, Va. – This weekend, I-95/I-495 North (Outer Loop of the Capital Beltway) traffic is scheduled to be transferred onto the new Woodrow Wilson Bridge, completing the first of two traffic switches onto the new bridge. I-95 North/Outer Loop travelers should plan for major delays over the weekend, as very significant traffic impacts will occur. Specifically, from Friday, June 9 at 8:00 p.m. until as late as Monday, June 12 at 5:00 a.m., I-95 North/Outer Loop will be reduced to a single lane for up to four miles and several surrounding ramps will be closed and detoured. Motorists and truckers are cautioned to steer clear of the Wilson Bridge Project area, which extends 7.5-miles from Telegraph Road in Virginia to Maryland Route 210. Traffic analyses indicate that if 60 percent of travelers stay away, delays will peak at about one hour, with backups extending as far as four miles.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit
    BEFORE THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 367 IN THE MATTER OF: Served June 17, 1964 Applications for Certificates ) of Public Convenience and ) Necessity by: ) ) • D. C. Transit System, Inc. ) Application No. 64 Washington, D. C. ) ) Alexandria, Barcroft and Washington ) Application No. 43 Transit Company ) Alexandria, Virginia ) ) Washington, Virginia and Maryland ) Application No. 60 Coach Company, Inc. ) Arlington, Virginia ) ) W M A Transit Company ) Application No. 23 Bradbury Heights, Maryland ) ) The Gray Line, Inc. ) Application No. 65 Washington, D. C. ) APPEARANCES: As shown in the Conference Report attached hereto and made a part hereof. Applications for certificates of public convenience and neces- sity authorizing continuance of operations being conducted on the ef- fective date of the Compact and on the effective date of the Compact as amended, pursuant to Section 4(a), Article XII, Title II, of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Regulation Compact (grandfather clause) were timely filed by D. C. Transit System, Inc.; Alexandria, Barcroft and Washington Transit Company; Washington, Virginia and Maryland Coach Company, Inc.; W M A Transit Company; and The Gray Line, Inc. Public notice of these applications was duly given and every interested party was afforded every opportunity to present its views to the Commission in the disposition of these applications. Under the Compact, no formal hearings are required in disposing of these applications. However, as noted in the attached Conference Report, numerous informal discussions and conferences were held between the Staff of the Commission and all parties of record con- cerning the issues involved. The only issues involved were whether or not the applications were timely filed and whether or not the applicants were bona fide engaged in transportation subject to this Act for which authority was sought.
    [Show full text]
  • NSF Indian Head
    Naval Support Facility Indian Head Joint Land Use Study FINAL Report December 5, 2016 September 2016 1 | Page Draft Final CHARLES COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Equal Opportunity Employer Department of Planning & Growth Management P.O. Box 2150 • 200 Baltimore Street • La Plata, MD 20646 (301) 645-0550 • (301) 870-3000 MD Relay: 711 • Relay TDD: 1-800-735-2258 www.CharlesCountyMD.gov Mission Statement - The mission of Charles County Government is to provide our citizens the highest quality service possible in a timely, efficient, and courteous manner. To achieve this goal, our government must be operated in an open and accessible atmosphere, be based on comprehensive long- and short-term planning, and have an appropriate managerial organization tempered by fiscal responsibility. We support and encourage efforts to grow a diverse workplace. Vision Statement - Charles County is a place where all people thrive and businesses grow and prosper; where the preservation of our heritage and environment is paramount; where government services to its citizens are provided at the highest level of excellence; and where the quality of life is the best in the nation. Americans with Disabilities – The Charles County Government welcomes the participation of individuals with disabilities. We comply fully with the Americans With Disabilities Act in making reasonable accommodations to encourage involvement. If you require special assistance and would like to participate in our programs, please contact Charles County Government directly. Equal Opportunity Employer – It is the policy of Charles County to provide equal employment opportunity to all persons regardless of race, color, sex, age, national origin, religious or political affiliation or opinion, disability, marital status, sexual orientation, genetic information, gender identity or expression, or any other status protected by law.
    [Show full text]
  • MDOT SHA Sound Barrier Policy
    HIGHWAY NOISE ABATEMENT PLANNING AND ENGINEERING GUIDELINES FINAL April 16, 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MDOT SHA HIGHWAY NOISE ABATEMENT PLANNING AND ENGINEERING GUIDELINES – April 16, 2020 The Maryland Department of Transportation (MDOT) Noise Policy (2020) consists of a brief policy statement, applicable to all of the MDOT Transportation Business Units. This document, the Maryland Department of Transportation State Highway Administration (MDOT SHA) Highway Noise Abatement Planning and Engineering Guidelines (2020), explains how to correctly apply the policy for highway projects. The purpose of this Executive Summary is to highlight some of the key elements found in the guidelines. The 2020 Guidelines are based upon the provisions contained in Title 23 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 772 (23 CFR 772)1 and replace the 2011 MDOT SHA Highway Noise Policy and Highway Noise Policy Implementation Guidelines. For a given Type I project, the adjacent land uses are divided into one of seven possible Activity Categories, which are either noise sensitive (A through E) or not noise sensitive (F and G). Each noise sensitive category has a corresponding Noise Abatement Criteria (NAC) defined in 23 CFR 772 and MDOT SHA’s impact criteria is set 1 dB(A) less than the NAC, consistent with federal regulations. Category B covers exterior impacts for residential areas and has an impact level of 66 dB(A). Highway traffic noise impacts are identified for the affected noise sensitive land use when the subject Type I project will either result in noise levels that approach or exceed the applicable NAC, or result in an increase of 10 dB(A) or more (‘substantial increase’) over existing levels.
    [Show full text]
  • REMEMBERING WHEN . . . the North
    SUMMER 2011 A Publication for the Community of Historic Leonardtown ~ Est. 1660 At Home in Leonardtown featuring . REMEMBERING WHEN . The North End As recalled by Ernie Bell, Bob Combs, and Al Gough Calendar of Events the Forties and Fifties of the past century through Maguire Mattingly’s farm, provided the FIRST FRIDAY-EVERY MONTH Celebration of “First Fridays” for those living in or about Leonardtown, backdrop for a Tom Sawyer like boyhood. Baseball Downtown and Uptown Leonardtown In The North End was both a destination was central to growing up in The North End. There and a location. For those who lived and worked was no organized Little League. There was though, JULY 16 & AUGUST 20 there, it was common- The North End Giants, a Sunrise Yoga Leonardtown Wharf place to refer to one’s rag tag team of seven or so home or store as being pre-teenagers who, with JULY 23 & AUGUST 27 in The North End. Geo- one bat, one ball, a roll of Downtown Tunes graphically, The North tar tape, two dogs and no Leonardtown Square End is a half mile stretch adult supervision defeated AUGUST 2 lying between the inter- its “Wharf Hill” nemesis North End National Night Out section of Jefferson and GENERAL STORE in the 1951 end of summer Leonardtown Village & Washington Streets (bet- championship game by Leonard’s Freehold ter known as Saunders’s a score of 120 to 117 in AUGUST 5 Corner) and Buena Vista a seven hour marathon Special First Friday Celebration (the Burch home running that began at 0800 hours, The North End General Store at Leonardtown Square parallel with the main en- and which was briefly Saunders Corner, circa 1963.
    [Show full text]