The Betrayal of the Five Civilized Tribes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Betrayal of the Five Civilized Tribes OKLAHOMA Debo, Angie. And Still the Waters Run: And Still the Waters Run: The Betrayal of the Five Civilized Tribes. The Betrayal of the Five Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1940. Civilized Tribes The purpose of Angie Debo’s work “And Still the Waters Run: The Betrayal The Curtis Act of 1898 dissolved what of the Five Civilized Tribes” was to show how the Five Civilized Tribes were little power Indian nations had and forced by invading whites, through treaty and coercion, into giving up their land, subjected all people in the territory to Courtesy Princeton University resources and sovereignty. The treaties made with the tribes were promised federal law. The Curtis Act was drafted by Press. ©1940 by Princeton to last “as long as the waters run, Kansas senator Charles Curtis, a mixed University Press; Copyright ©renewed 1968 by Princeton as long as the grass grows.” This blood Kansa Indian. Although Curtis was University Press; New material promise was not kept. Debo’s work the original drafter, Congress made several copyright ©1972 by Princeton detailing this story was finished in changes to the document to effectively University Press. 1936. However, the University of strip most of the Indians rights away. The Oklahoma Press refused to publish it end result was bitterly ironic, for an Indian unless it was changed. Debo refused. had thus drafted the legislation that led to It was only in 1940 that Princeton the end of Indian sovereignty. The age of military University Press published her now “conquest was succeeded classic book. by the age of economic The forced Indian Removal began absorption, when the long when Andrew Jackson became rifle of the frontiersman was president. The Indian Removal Act Cherokee Chief Wilma Mankiller, displaced by the legislative of 1830 began the government’s 1986. Courtesy Special Collections and enactment and court decree University Archives, OSU. relocation of Native Americans across of the legal exploiter, and the the Mississippi. They were moved to lease, mortgage, and deed of modern day Oklahoma. As a punishment for siding with the Confederacy during the land shark. the Civil War, they then lost the western half of today’s Oklahoma. (Debo, p. ix) ” Before whites arrived in America, Indians shared land among everyone in the tribe. This concept caused many problems for whites when they sought trade Geronimo in his favorite bonnet. Courtesy Research Division, Oklahoma agreements, purchases of Indian land and the rights to minerals in Indian Territory. Historical Society, W.P. Campbell In 1893, President Grover Cleveland appointed Henry Dawes to a commission Collection. whose purpose was to convince the Five Civilized Tribes to agree to renounce Activities: their tribal ownership of land and adopt an individual allotment system. As a 1) Develop a tri-fold handout that explains the “Trail of Tears.” Create drawings result, whites could now purchase land from individual Indians instead of having to and explain each with a caption. broker deals with an entire tribe. Although Indians received money for their land, 2) Create a “spatial poem” dealing with the issues of Indian removal. Design a they were essentially giving back all of what the white man had given them when layout and background for the poem that reflects the intended effect on the they were moved to Oklahoma. That led to more white settlements. viewers and readers. Content developed by Andrew Caldwell and Ryan Linden 5.
Recommended publications
  • Friends of the Capitol 2009-June 2010 Report
    Friends of the Capitol 2009-June 2010 Report Our Mission Statement: Friends of the Capitol is a tax-exempt 501(c)(3) corporation that is devoted to maintaining and improving the beauty and grandeur of the Oklahoma State Capitol building and showcasing the magnificent gifts of art housed inside. This mission is accomplished through a partnership with private citizens wishing to leave their footprint in our state's rich history. Education and Development In 2009 and 2010 Friends of the Capitol (FOC) participated in several educational and developmental projects informing fellow Oklahomans of the beauty of the capitol and how they can participate in the continuing renovations of Oklahoma State Capitol building. In March of 2010, FOC representatives made a trip to Elk City and met with several organizations within the community and illustrated all the new renovations funded by Friends of the Capitol supporters. Additionally in 2009 FOC participated in the State Superintendent’s encyclo-media conference and in February 2010 FOC participated in the Oklahoma City Public Schools’ Professional Development Day. We had the opportunity to meet with teachers from several different communities in Oklahoma, and we were pleased to inform them about all the new restorations and how their school’s name can be engraved on a 15”x30”paver, and placed below the Capitol’s south steps in the Centennial Memorial Plaza to be admired by many generations of Oklahomans. Gratefully Acknowledging the Friends of the Capitol Board of Directors Board Members Ex-Officio Paul B. Meyer, Col. John Richard Chairman USA (Ret.) MA+ Architecture Oklahoma Department Oklahoma City of Central Services Pat Foster, Vice Chairman Suzanne Tate Jim Thorpe Association Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reserved Right Does Not Make a Wrong
    Tulsa Law Review Volume 48 Issue 2 Winter 2012 A Reserved Right Does Not Make a Wrong Wyatt M. Cox Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Wyatt M. Cox, A Reserved Right Does Not Make a Wrong, 48 Tulsa L. Rev. 373 (2013). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr/vol48/iss2/20 This Casenote/Comment is brought to you for free and open access by TU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tulsa Law Review by an authorized editor of TU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cox: A Reserved Right Does Not Make a Wrong A RESERVED RIGHT DOES NOT MAKE A WRONG 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................. 374 II. TREATIES WITH THE TRIBAL NATIONS ............................................. 375 A. The Canons of Construction. ........................... ...... 375 B. The Power and Purpose of the Indian Treaty ............................... 376 C. The Equal Footing Doctrine .............................................377 D. A Brief Overview of the Policy History of Treaties ............ ........... 378 E. The Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek.........................380 III. THE ESTABLISHMENT AND EXPANSION OF THE INDIAN RESERVED WATER RIGHT ....381 A. Winters v. United States: The Establishment of Reserved Indian Water Rights...................................................382 B. Arizona v. California:Not Only Enough Water to Fulfill the Purposes of Today, but Enough to Fulfill the Purposes of Forever ...................... 383 C. Cappaertv. United States: The Supreme Court Further Expands the Winters Doctrine ........................................ 384 IV. Two OKLAHOMA CASES THAT SUPPORT THE TRIBAL NATION CLAIMS .................... 385 A. Choctaw Nation v. Oklahoma (The Arkansas River Bank Case) ..................
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of United States Federal Indian Law and Policy
    Outline of United States federal Indian law and policy The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to United States federal Indian law and policy: Federal Indian policy – establishes the relationship between the United States Government and the Indian Tribes within its borders. The Constitution gives the federal government primary responsibility for dealing with tribes. Law and U.S. public policy related to Native Americans have evolved continuously since the founding of the United States. David R. Wrone argues that the failure of the treaty system was because of the inability of an individualistic, democratic society to recognize group rights or the value of an organic, corporatist culture represented by the tribes.[1] U.S. Supreme Court cases List of United States Supreme Court cases involving Indian tribes Citizenship Adoption Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield, 490 U.S. 30 (1989) Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, 530 U.S. _ (2013) Tribal Ex parte Joins, 191 U.S. 93 (1903) Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez, 436 U.S. 49 (1978) Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield, 490 U.S. 30 (1989) South Dakota v. Bourland, 508 U.S. 679 (1993) Civil rights Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe, 435 U.S. 191 (1978) United States v. Wheeler, 435 U.S. 313 (1978) Congressional authority Ex parte Joins, 191 U.S. 93 (1903) White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker, 448 U.S. 136 (1980) California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, 480 U.S. 202 (1987) South Dakota v. Bourland, 508 U.S. 679 (1993) United States v.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenge Bowl 2020
    Notice: study guide will be updated after the December general election. Sponsored by the Muscogee (Creek) Nation Challenge Bowl 2020 High School Study Guide Sponsored by the Challenge Bowl 2020 Muscogee (Creek) Nation Table of Contents A Struggle To Survive ................................................................................................................................ 3-4 1. Muscogee History ......................................................................................................... 5-30 2. Muscogee Forced Removal ........................................................................................... 31-50 3. Muscogee Customs & Traditions .................................................................................. 51-62 4. Branches of Government .............................................................................................. 63-76 5. Muscogee Royalty ........................................................................................................ 77-79 6. Muscogee (Creek) Nation Seal ...................................................................................... 80-81 7. Belvin Hill Scholarship .................................................................................................. 82-83 8. Wilbur Chebon Gouge Honors Team ............................................................................. 84-85 9. Chronicles of Oklahoma ............................................................................................... 86-97 10. Legends & Stories ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma Women
    Oklahomafootloose andWomen: fancy–free Newspapers for this educational program provided by: 1 Oklahoma Women: Footloose and Fancy-Free is an educational supplement produced by the Women’s Archives at Oklahoma State University, the Oklahoma Commission on the Status of Women and The Oklahoman. R. Darcy Jennifer Paustenbaugh Kate Blalack With assistance from: Table of Contents Regina Goodwin Kelly Morris Oklahoma Women: Footloose and Fancy-Free 2 Jordan Ross Women in Politics 4 T. J. Smith Women in Sports 6 And special thanks to: Women Leading the Fight for Civil and Women’s Rights 8 Trixy Barnes Women in the Arts 10 Jamie Fullerton Women Promoting Civic and Educational Causes 12 Amy Mitchell Women Take to the Skies 14 John Gullo Jean Warner National Women’s History Project Oklahoma Heritage Association Oklahoma Historical Society Artist Kate Blalack created the original Oklahoma Women: watercolor used for the cover. Oklahoma, Foot-Loose and Fancy Free is the title of Footloose and Fancy-Free Oklahoma historian Angie Debo’s 1949 book about the Sooner State. It was one of the Oklahoma women are exciting, their accomplishments inspirations for this 2008 fascinating. They do not easily fi t into molds crafted by Women’s History Month supplement. For more on others, elsewhere. Oklahoma women make their own Angie Debo, see page 8. way. Some stay at home quietly contributing to their families and communities. Some exceed every expectation Content for this and become fi rsts in politics and government, excel as supplement was athletes, entertainers and artists. Others go on to fl ourish developed from: in New York, California, Japan, Europe, wherever their The Oklahoma Women’s fancy takes them.
    [Show full text]
  • This Land Is Herland
    9780806169262.TIF Examines the experiences and achievements of women activists in Oklahoma This Land Is Herland Gendered Activism in Oklahoma from the 1870s to the 2010s Edited by Sarah Eppler Janda and Patricia Loughlin Contributions by Chelsea Ball, Lindsey Churchill, Heather Clemmer, Amanda Cobb-Greetham, Sarah Eppler Janda, Farina King, Sunu Kodumthara, Patricia Loughlin, Amy L. Scott, Rowan Faye Steineker, Melissa N. Stuckey, Rachel E. Watson, and Cheryl Elizabeth Brown Wattley. Since well before ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment in 1920 secured their right to vote, women in Oklahoma have sought to change and uplift their communities through political activism. This Land Is Herlandbrings together the stories of thirteen women activists and explores their varied experiences from the territorial period to the VOLUME 1 IN THE WOMEN AND THE AMERICAN WEST present. Organized chronologically, the essays discuss Progressive reformer Kate Bar- nard, educator and civil rights leader Clara Luper, and Comanche leader and activist JULY 2021 LaDonna Harris, as well as lesser-known individuals such as Cherokee historian and $24.95 PAPER 978-0-8061-6926-2 educator Rachel Caroline Eaton, entrepreneur and NAACP organizer California M. 318 PAGES, 6 X 9 Taylor, and Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) champion Wanda Jo Peltier Stapleton. 21 B&W ILLUS. U.S. HISTORY/WOMEN’S STUDIES Edited by Sarah Eppler Janda and Patricia Loughlin, the collection connects Okla- homa women’s individual and collective endeavors to the larger themes of intersec- ORDER ONLINE AT OUPRESS.COM tionality, suffrage, politics, motherhood, and civil rights in the American West and the United States. The historians explore how race, ethnicity, social class, gender, and ORDER BY PHONE political power shaped—and were shaped by—these women’s efforts to improve their INSIDE THE U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chickasaw Ardmore
    United States Department of the Interior Washingron, DC 20240 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OCT 1 5 2020 The Honorable Bill Anoatubby Governor, Chickasaw Nation Post Office Box 1548 Ada, Oklahoma 74821 Dear Governor Anoatubby: In 2016, the Chickasaw Nation of Oklahoma (Nation) submitted to the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) an application to transfer into trust two parcels of lands, totaling approximately 61.63 acres and collectively known as the Kingston Property, near the City of Kingston, Marshall County, Oklahoma (Site) for gaming and other purposes.1 Nation also requested a determination of eligibility to conduct gaming on the Site. The Nation seeks to develop a casino-resort (Proposed Project). We have completed our review of the Nation's request and the documentation in the record. As discussed below, it is my determination that the Site will be transferred into trust for the benefit of the Nation pursuant to the Indian Reorganization Act, 25 U.S.C. § 5108. Once transferred into trust, the Nation may conduct gaming on the Site pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, 25 U.S.C. § 2719. Background The Nation historically occupied its homelands in what are today Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee, and Kentucky. In 1832, following a series of land cessions, the Nation ultimately ceded the remainder of its lands in exchange for land west of the Mississippi River.2 The United States established the boundaries of the Nation's reservation in Oklahoma in the Treaty of 1855.3 In 1897, under the authority of the General Allotment Act, the Nation joined the Choctaw Nation in negotiations with the Dawes Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • The Homestead Act and the General Allotment Act David Edlefsen
    How the West was Claimed: The Homestead Act and the General Allotment Act David Edlefsen Claremont Graduate University [email protected] Prepared for Western Political Science Association Conference San Francisco, CA, March 31, 2018 How the West was Claimed 2 Whenever someone looks at a globe or map of the world one thing should clearly stand out, the United States is big. At a whopping 2.3 billion acres, it is nearly the size of the entire continent of Europe (2.52 billion acres), and either the 3rd or 4th largest nation.1 Yet, when this nation obtained independence in 1783 it only had claim to the land east of the Mississippi River and north of Spanish controlled Florida. The rest of what would become the United States was owned/claimed by the United Kingdom via Canada, France, Spain, Russia, and later Mexico.2 While the United States had a relative humble beginning, the land it owned was rich with fir, timbers, farmland, and other resources. All this land blessed with an abundance of resources, only fueled its desire to claim more land. “That claim is by the right of our manifest destiny to overspread and to possess the whole of the continent which Providence has given us for the development of the great experiment of liberty and federated self-government entrusted to us.”3 This line, written by John O’Sullivan in 1845 not only popularized the term manifest destiny, it summed up the belief of many Americans since the early 19th century that we had a divine right to the rest of the land despite the fact that much of it was owned/claimed by other nations, which the Louisiana Purchase and the cession of Florida helped fuel.
    [Show full text]
  • Medium of Blood Verifiable Ancestry As a Conduit of Cherokee National
    Medienimpulse ISSN 2307-3187 Jg. 50, Nr. 2, 2012 Lizenz: CC-BY-NC-ND-3.0-AT Medium of Blood Verifiable Ancestry as a Conduit of Cherokee National Identity Eddie Glenn Blood quantum, the measurement of American Indian ancestry possessed by members of America’s Indigenous nations, is most often considered a rubric utilized by the federal government in an oppressive form, or by tribal nations themselves as standards of tribal citizenship requirements. In this essay, the authors recontextualize blood as a medium of national identity within the context of the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma. Such decentering, as presented here, illuminates Cherokee nationhood in ways that have significant political import. In his November, 2011 inaugural address, Bill John Baker, Principal Chief of the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma, stated that the tribe’s status as a nation on equal terms with the United States government had been medienimpulse, Jg. 50, Nr. 2, 2012 1 Glenn Medium of BloodVerifiable Ancestry as a Conduit of Cherokee National ... earned with “our resolve, our blood, and our tears”(Baker 2011). While the statement may seem, to many Westerners, to be a political platitude referencing sacrifice and fortitude, the comment – specifically the reference to “blood” – had especially pertinent meaning for Baker’s audience of Cherokee tribal members. As anthropologist Circe Sturm (2002) has argued, the concepts of “blood” and “blood quantum” – the percentage of verifiable Indian ancestry a member of an American Indian tribe possesses – are key concepts to Cherokee identity (203). Cherokee author and scholar Robert Conley (2008), however, contends that blood quantum, and the Certificates of Degree of Indian Blood (CDIBs) issued by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • ~Z:V.K Abstract Approved: Laf D the Civil War Conjures up Images Ofbattles Like Gettysburg, Emancipation, Or Soldiers Clad in Blue and Gray
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Eric Neill Oldham for the Master of Arts in American History presented on April 22, 2002 Title: A FOrgottend2le: The LO Creeks and Their Trials during the Civil War ~ ~Z:v.k Abstract approved: LAf d The Civil War conjures up images ofbattles like Gettysburg, emancipation, or soldiers clad in blue and gray. Historians write about great leaders and heroic soldiers, but still some figures go almost unconsidered. A forgotten people by many, the Loyal Creeks have their own story of the Civil War. This thesis uses both primary and secondary sources to create a historical narrative about the Loyal Creeks and shows their trials during the Civil War. Creeks struggled over question of allegiance and alliance as much as Americans, a struggle which culminated in a tragic and ultimately deadly intertribal split. This thesis reveals the reasons for the Creek split. The story of the Loyal Creeks did not end with the wartime division of the Creek Nation. The division forced those who remained loyal to the Union to abandon their homes and country. The Loyal Creeks escaped to Kansas in search of government refuge but found only a three-year struggle to survive at various refugee sites. Survival for the Loyal Creeks was a struggle because government aid was scarce at best. Hard, cold winters and lack of clothing, shelter, and food caused many of the Indians to die either from the elements or to become susceptible to disease that ultimately took untold lives. The Loyal Creeks' struggle with the government is not a new story, but combined with their intertribal split it is not only an important event in Indian history but in American history as well.
    [Show full text]
  • NIE Angie Debo 09 Teachers Supp.Indd
    TEACHER’S GUIDE 1 Educators, the following pages of the teacher’s guide include additional information for you to help guide your students through the activities in their student supplements. The content and activities meet many social studies PASS Standards across various grade levels, particularly at grade 4 and the high school level. 2 Activity #1: Angie Debo was born in Beattie, Kansas. She bringing to light the wrongdoings of high ranking officials. Debo then moved to Marshall, Oklahoma. She went to the University also had troubles because she was a woman. She missed out on of Oklahoma in Norman. Then, she went to the University of job opportunities as a writer and as a university faculty member. Chicago in Chicago, Illinois. From there, she went to West Texas It was hard for Debo to get people to listen to her because she State Teacher’s College in Canyon, Texas. She went on to work in was a woman. However, once people realized how talented of a Oklahoma City and then Stillwater. researcher and writer Debo was, she was able to publish her many books. Student answers on what Debo’s ability to overcome these Activity #2: Much of Angie Debo’s problems in publishing hardships means to them will vary. were due to her incriminating claims about state officials. Debo always sought to tell the entire truth, not just part of it. She was not published initially because of fear of what might happen by 3 Answers developed by Travis Tindell Activity #1: There are 373 miles between Natchez and between treatment in Indian Territory as opposed to the Hugo.
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma WOMEN's HAIL of FAME
    OKlAHOMA WOMEN'S HAIL OF FAME he Oklahoma Women's Hall of Fame, created in 1982, is a project ofthe T Oklahoma Commission on the Status ofWomen. Inductees are women who have lived in Oklahoma for a major portion of their lives or who are easily identified as Oklahomans and are: pioneers in their field or in a project that benefits Oklahoma, have made a significant contribution to the State of Oklahoma, serve or have served as role models to other Oklahoma women, are "unsung heroes" who have made a difference in the lives of Oklahomans or Americans because of their actions, have championed other women, women's issues, or served as public policy advocates for issues important to women. Inductees exemplifY the Oklahoma Spirit. Since 2001, the awards have been presented in odd numbered years during "Women's History Month" in March. A call for nominations takes place during the late summer of the preceding year. *inducted posthumously 1982 Hannah Diggs Atkins Oklahoma City State Representative, U.N. Ambassador Photo courtesy of' Oklahoma State University Library 158 Notable Women/Women's Hall ofFame 1982 Kate Barnard* Oklahoma City Charities & Corrections Commissioner, Social Reform Advocate Photo courtesy ofOklahoma Historical Society 1982 June Brooks Ardmore Educator, Oil and Gas Executive Photo copyright, The Oklahoma Publishing Company 1982 Gloria Stewart Farley Heavener Local Historian Photo provided Oklahoma Women's Almanac 159 1982 Aloysius Larch-Miller* Oklahoma City Woman Suffrage Leader Photo copyright, The Oklahoma Publishing Company 1982 Susie Peters Anadarko Founder Kiowa Indian School of Art Photo courtesy of Oklahoma Historical Society 1982 Christine Salmon Stillwater Educator, Mayor, Community Volunteer Photo courtesy ofSheerar Museum, Stillwater, OK 160 Notable Women/Women's Hall of Fame 1982 Edyth Thomas Wallace Oklahoma City Journalist Photo copyright, The Oklahoma Publishing Company 1983 Zelia N.
    [Show full text]