Wetting Properties of Graphene Aerogels
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Wetting Properties of Graphene Aerogels Francesco De Nicola,1, ∗ Ilenia Viola,2 Lorenzo Donato Tenuzzo,3 Florian Rasch,4 Martin R. Lohe,5 Ali Shaygan Nia,5 Fabian Sch¨utt,4 Xinliang Feng,5 Rainer Adelung,4 and Stefano Lupi1, 3 1Graphene Labs, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Morego 30, 16163 Genova, Italy 2CNR NANOTEC-Institute of Nanotechnology, S.Li.M. Lab, Department of Physics, University of Rome La Sapienza, P.le A. Moro 5, 00185 Roma, Italy 3Department of Physics, University of Rome La Sapienza, P.le A. Moro 5, 00185 Roma, Italy 4Functional Nanomaterials, Institute for Materials Science, Kiel University, Kaiser Str. 2, 24143 Kiel, Germany 5Center for Advancing Electronics Dresden (CFAED) & Department of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, Technische Universit¨atDresden, Helmholtzstraße 10, 01069 Dresden, Germany (Dated: February 7, 2020) Graphene hydrophobic coatings paved the way chemical9, mechanical10, and thermal stability11 have towards a new generation of optoelectronic and been addressed. Among the numerous materials having fluidic devices. Nevertheless, such hydrophobic the two aforementioned features, graphene offers versatil- thin films rely only on graphene non-polar sur- ity, stability, and multi-functionality owing to its unique face, rather than taking advantage of its surface optical12 and electronic13 properties, making its usage roughness. Furthermore, graphene is typically widespread in hydrophobic surface realizations14{16. not self-standing. Differently, carbon aerogels have high porosity, large effective surface area due to their surface roughness, and very low mass INTRODUCTION density, which make them a promising candidate as a super-hydrophobic material for novel tech- 2 nological applications. However, despite a few Graphene is constituted by a sp lattice of graphitic works reporting the general super-hydrophobic carbon, thus it has a slightly hydrophilic (graphite con- ◦17 and lipophilic behavior of the carbon aerogels, a tact angle ≈ 86 ) but non-polar surface. Neverthe- detailed characterization of their wetting prop- less, surface functionalization and substrate interactions erties is still missing, to date. Here, the wet- may be exploited to tailor graphene wetting properties 15,16 ting properties of graphene aerogels are demon- in a controlled fashion . However, graphene has been strated in detail. Without any chemical function- used so far to realize hydrophobic coatings only employ- alization or patterning of their surface, the sam- ing its non-polar surface, rather than taking advantage ples exhibit a super-lipophilic state and a station- of its surface roughness. Furthermore, graphene is not ary super-hydrophobic state with a contact angle self-standing in most application, acting thus as a coat- up to 150 ± 15◦ and low contact angle hysteresis ing. 18{22 ≈ 15◦, owing to the fakir effect. In addition, the On the other hand, carbon aerogels are carbon- adhesion force of the graphene aerogels in con- based, macroscopic, three-dimensional structures charac- tact with the water droplets and their surface terized by a randomly crosslinking network of hierarchi- tension are evaluated. For instance, the unique cal nanostructures and microstructures. Typically, aero- wettability and enhanced liquid absorption of the gels have high porosity, very low mass density, and large graphene aerogels can be exploited for reducing effective surface area due to their hierarchical high sur- contamination from oil spills and chemical leak- face roughness, which make them a promising candidate age accidents. as a super-hydrophobic material for novel technological 19{22 In general, the realization of artificial hydrophobic sur- applications. Despite a few works reporting the ob- faces depends on the material surface chemical com- servation of a super-hydrophobic and lipophilic behavior in carbon aerogels, the characterization of the wetting arXiv:2002.02183v1 [physics.app-ph] 6 Feb 2020 position and its morphological structure. Although the chemical composition is an intrinsic material prop- properties of such a class of materials is still missing, to erty, it can be engineered to decrease the solid sur- date. face tension1, therefore increase the hydrophobicity of Here, we give insight on the wetting properties of the surface. On the other hand, surface roughness2,3 graphene aerogels in detail. In particular, we show that (micro- and nano-morphology) may also enhance the hy- owing to their particular morphology and high surface drophobicity, particularly by exploiting hierarchical2,4{7 porosity (up to 0.81), our graphene aerogels exhibit a and fractal architectures7,8, that allow the formation of super-lipophilic state and a stationary super-hydrophobic ? air pockets to prevent water imbibition. Nonetheless, state, achieving high apparent contact angle values θ ≥ ◦ 1 ◦ the fabrication of a permanent super-hydrophobic sur- 150 , with low contact angle hysteresis (CAH) ≈ 15 , 2 face is a challenging task. Recently, time durability5{7, and high work of adhesion (10 mJ/m ). In addition, we characterized the graphene aerogel solid surface tension. 2 3 with Φc + Φ− = 1, where ρc = 2200 kg/m and Φc = Vc=V are respectively the density and the volume frac- 3 tion of the carbon phase, while ρair = 1:225 kg/m and Φ− = Vair=V are the density and the volume fraction of air, respectively. Hence, the effective mass density is defined as ρeff = ρc(1 − Φ−). Therefore, the aerogel porous fraction is Φ− = 0:992 − 0:998, leading to an ef- 3 fective mass density down to ρeff = 5 kg/m . Owing to their random surface morphology, the static contact angle on porous media can be defined only on average1. The contact angle of a water droplet cast on a representative Aerographene aerogel is shown in Figure 2a. We measured a maximum apparent contact angle θ∗ = 150 ± 15◦ on our samples, thus the sample is super- hydrophobic (θ∗ ≥ 150◦). The error on the contact angle was evaluated by the CAH, that is defined as the differ- ence between the advancing and receding contact angle (Figure 2b). Such a low CAH is due to the highly rough and porous surface of the samples and it is peculiar of the fakir effect26. Moreover, we evaluated the work of adhesion of the aerogel surface in contact with water by the Young-Dupr´e equation1 ∗ Wadh = γLV (1 + cos θ ): (1) For the super-hydrophobic sample in Figure 2a, Wadh ≈ 10 mJ/m2. Therefore, for a water drop with diameter 1 mm, the adhesion force of the Aerographene aerogel in contact with the drop is Fadh ≈ 10 µN. For instance, the obtained result is about 17% lower than the adhesion 27 FIG. 1. Aerographene aerogels morphology. a, Image of a force of a single gecko foot-hair , but 10 times higher water droplet cast on a hydrophobic Aerographene aerogel. b, than that of Salvinia leaf28, and compatible with that Representative SEM micrograph of the Aerographene aerogel reported for carbon nanotube films6. surface. Inset, Detail of carbon tetrapods. In order to better understand the wettability of Aero- graphene aerogels, we characterized their wetting states with respect to a highly oriented pyrolytic graphite RESULTS AND DISCUSSION (HOPG) reference substrate (Bruker). In Figure 2c, we report the contact angle of the super-hydrophobic aero- gel and the HOPG as a function of the concentration in The graphene aerogels studied are made of a cellu- volume of ethanol in water. Since ethanol has a lower lar material called Aerographene (see Methods). The liquid-vapor surface tension (γLV = 22 mN/m) than wa- samples have a square-shaped surface with a lateral ter (γLV = 72 mN/m), the higher the ethanol concentra- size L = 2 cm, a thickness d = 0:2 cm, and a mass tion, the lower the surface tension of the overall solution. m = 5 − 15 mg. A representative sample is reported in Generally, the contact angle between a chemically ho- Figure 1a. From the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) mogeneous solid surface and a liquid droplet obeys to the micrograph in Figure 1b, a random network made of Young relation1 micrometer-sized carbon tetrapods23{25 constituting the aerogel surface (Figure 1b, inset) can be observed. This γ − γ cos θ = SV SL ; (2) particular shape is due to the precursor ZnO template γLV employed during the material synthesis. Therefore, such a highly porous (volume porosity up to ≈ 0:99) system where γSV and γSL are the solid-vapor and solid-liquid cannot be considered as an homogeneous solid. surface tensions, respectively. Therefore, the lower the The mass density of the Aerographene aerogels can be surface tension of the liquid droplet, the lower the Young estimated at first approximation by ρ = m=V . However, contact angle of the HOPG. This phenomenon is con- this is the total mass density, as aerogels are matter with nected to the lipophilicity of the non-polar surface of a mixed phase of gas and solid. Hence, a better estima- carbon-based materials. Indeed, a minimum contact an- tion of the solid mass density can be provided by the ef- gle (θ = 70◦) can be measured on the HOPG for pure fective medium approximation ρ = ρc(1 − Φ−) + ρairΦ−, ethanol droplets (Figure 2c). On the other hand, it was 3 FIG. 2. Contact angle measurements. a, Image of a sessile water droplet cast on a super-hydrophobic (θ∗ = 150 ± 15◦) Aerographene aerogel. b, Contact angle as a function of time by increasing (black dots) and decreasing (red dots) the water droplet volume cast on the aerogel. The advancing and receding contact angles are marked. c, Contact angles of Aerographene aerogel (red dots) and HOPG (black dots) as a function of the ethanol volume concentration in water. The black arrow marks the lipophilic transition point between the Wenzel and Cassie-Baxter regime. d, Wenzel-Cassie-Baxter wetting phase diagram of the Aerographene aerogel surface with respect to the HOPG surface. Wetting states are studied changing the liquid surface tension by adding different concentrations in volume of ethanol in water.