DOCSLIB.ORG

Children in the Halls of Justi(

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Children in the Halls of Justi( If you have issues viewing or accessing this file, please contact us at NCJRS.gov. CHILDREN IN THE HALLS OF JUSTI( A REPORT ON CHILD CARE IN THE COURTS r~ !.o CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF SOCIAL POLICY JUNE 199S This document was prepared by the Center for the Study of Social Policy, supported by grant number 94-DD-CX-0030, awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance, U. S. Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarilyrepresent the officialposition or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. The Bureau of Justice Assistance is a component of the Office of Justice Programs which also includes the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, and the Office for Victims of Crime. NATIONAL COURTCARE P EMONSTRATION PRO| ECT ADVISORY COMMITTEE Chairperson: Beverly Muench Hon. Julian T. Houston Deputy Director Associate Justice Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Massachusetts Superior Court Department Services BOSTON, MA LOS ANGELES, CA Vice-chair: Alice Reitz Hon. Armis E. Hawkins Project Director Chief Justice Massachusetts Trial Court Child Mississippi Supreme Court Care Project JACKSON, MS BOSTON, MA Hon. Sophia H. Hall Pat Reynolds Presiding Judge Assistant General Manager Juvenile Division San Francisco Department of Social Services Circuit Court of Cook County SAN FRANCISCO, CA CHICAGO, IL Edward Schor, M.D. Patricia Hanrahan Chairperson Director Committee on Early Childhood, Adoption, and Commission on Poverty and Homelessness Dependent Care American Bar Association American Academy of Pediatrics WASHINGTON, DC BOSTON, MA Susan Keilitz Howard P. Schwartz, PhD Senior Attorney Judicial Administrator National Center for State Courts Kansas Judicial Center WILLIAMSBURG,VA TOPEKA, KS Joan Lombardi Project Director: Senior Advisor Lucy Hudson Office of the Assistant Secretary Senior Associate Administration for Children and Families Center for the Study of Social Policy U.S. Department of Health and Human Services WASHINGTON, DC WASHINGTON, DC Photo Credits: Richard Howard Pamela Willis Marshall Director FERC Child Development Center WASHINGTON, DC 157 2_ AC KNOWL ED G EMENTS In describing and analyzing existing court-based child care programs throughout the country, the Center for the Study of Social Policy (CSSP) relied on the expertise and knowledge of people in the many disciplines that contribute to the administration of justice. Court personnel and staff in the court-based child care centers described in this volume patiently answered a seemingly endless stream of questions about their programs and provided us with written materials, doing the footwork necessary to answer our questions when they did not know an answer themselves. We are deeply indebted to the staffat the Edmund D. Edelman Children's Court in Los Angeles, the Juvenile Division of San Francisco Superior Court, the Civil and Housing Courts in Manhattan and Brooklyn, and the New York Permanent Judicial Commission on Justice for Children. They very kindly hosted visits by CSSP staff, providing information, materials, and logistical guidance that resulted in very informative experiences. We would also like to recognize the project's Advisory Committee for their thoughtful participation and acknowledge with gratitude the leadership of Massachusetts Superior Court Judge Julian T. Houston, the Committee's Chairperson, and Mississippi Chief Justice Armis E. Hawkins, the Vice-chair. This report was authored by Lucy Hudson, Senior Associate, and Julie Farber, Associate, at the Center for the Study of Social Policy. Patricia Hrusa Williams, a consultant to the Center, also contributed to this report. Without the interest of the Justice Department this project would not exist. Attorney General Reno's commitment to children was matched by the enthusiasm of everyone in the Office of Justice Programs. CSSP would like to thank Laurie Robinson, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Justice Programs; Nancy Gist, Director of the Bureau of Justice Assistance; Charles M. Hollis, Adjudications Branch Chief; our project officer, Marilyn Nejelski; and Gale Farquhar and Pam Swain, framers of the BJA project outline. I i TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................................................................................i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................................................iii I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................................... 1 II. IMPROVING THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE: Two surveys of court personnel .................................................................................................................................................. 3 III. CHARACTERISTICS OF COURT-BASED CHILDREN'S PROGRAMS ....................................................................................... 7 IV. THE STATE OF THE ART: Descriptions of Children's Programs in the Courts ....................................................................... 17 ARIZONA ................................................................................................................................................................................... 17 CALIFORNIA ............................................................................................................................................................................ 18 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ...................................................................................................................................................... 30 HAWAII ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 32 ILLINOIS ................................................................................................................................................................................... 32 KANSAS ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 36 MARYLAND ............................................................................................................................................................................... 36 MASSACHUSETTS .................................................................................................................................................................. 37 MICHIGAN ................................................................................................................................................................................ 42 MINNESOTA ............................................................................................................................................................................. 43 NEVADA ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 43 NEW JERSEY ............................................................................................................................................................................ 44 NEW YORK ................................................................................................................................................................................ 44 OHIO .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 52 PENNSYLVANIA ....................................................................................................................................................................... 52 RHODE ISLAND ....................................................................................................................................................................... 55 VERMONT ................................................................................................................................................................................. 55 WISCONSIN .............................................................................................................................................................................. 56 V. A CLOSER LOOK AT CHILD CARE IN THE COURTS: Program models in New York City and Los Angeles ...................................................................................................................... 57 VI. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE DESIGN OF COURT-BASED CHILD CARE PROGRAMS ........................................................... 76 ENDNOTES ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 81 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Public confidence in the court system and our ability to administer justice swiftly, fairly and firmly continues to erode. The general public feels alienated from the courts,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2006 Annual Report
    2006 Annual Report Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Table of Contents 1SFTJEFOU+VEHFBOE%JTUSJDU$PVSU"ENJOJTUSBUPS 'JGUI+VEJDJBM%JTUSJDUPG1FOOTZMWBOJB+VEHFTPGUIF $PVSUPG$PNNPO1MFBTCZ%JWJTJPOBOE1IPUPHSBQI 5BCMFPG0SHBOJ[BUJPO $PVSU"ENJOJTUSBUJPO $SJNJOBM%JWJTJPO "EVMU1SPCBUJPO 'BNJMZ%JWJTJPO "EVMU4FDUJPO $IJMESFOT$PVSU +VWFOJMF4FDUJPO $JWJM%JWJTJPO 0SQIBOT$PVSU%JWJTJPO %JTUSJDU+VTUJDF$PVSUT +VEJDJBM5SBOTJUJPOT To the Citizens of Allegheny County We are pleased to present to the citizens of Allegheny County our 2006 Annual Report of Court operations. Joseph M. James Raymond L. Billotte President Judge District Court Administrator In February 2006, the Allegheny County Court of Common McClain, Ph.D., to facilitate the second annual high school Pleas began using the statewide Common Pleas Case education project in the city schools. This program, Management System (CPCMS) to manage and disseminate developed to educate students about the role of the courts Criminal Court case information. Allegheny County became in our society and their responsibilities as citizens, further the 59th of 60 judicial districts in Pennsylvania to “go-live” encourages students to participate in jury service by on CPCMS. An integrated case management system registering to vote. Common Pleas Court Judges visited 11 initiated by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, CPCMS was city high schools during the month of March 2006, created to facilitate secure, complete, timely and accurate impressing upon students the positive aspects of civic criminal justice information sharing among criminal justice responsibility. entities throughout the state. This system will eventually allow for access to certain information by the public. In December 2006, the Pretrial Services Agency was created to improve the Court’s ability to more closely The Court sponsored its first Juror Appreciation Day in May monitor defendants released on bail and coordinate pretrial 2006 in conjunction with Governor Ed Rendell, the services among various programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Business Is Still Dominating State Supreme Courts
    AP PHOTO/ERIC GAY PHOTO/ERIC AP Big Business is Still Dominating State Supreme Courts By Billy Corriher September 2016 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Big Business is Still Dominating State Supreme Courts By Billy Corriher September 2016 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 3 Tilting the law in favor of corporations 15 Conclusion: Reform judicial selection to minimize the influence of money 17 About the author 18 Appendix 35 Endnotes Introduction and summary The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the billionaire Koch brothers, and their big- business allies have engaged in a decades-long effort to elect pro-corporate judges to state courts. In 1971, a corporate lawyer named Lewis F. Powell Jr. wrote a secret memo to the chamber arguing that big business was under attack from insti- tutions he perceived as liberal: academics, the media, college students, and politi- cians.1 He also cited the public’s support for legislation to protect consumers and the environment. Powell lamented that “few elements of American society today have as little influence in government as the American businessman, the corpora- tion, or even the millions of corporate stockholders.”2 Powell suggested a solution: The Chamber . should consider assuming a broader and more vigorous role in the political arena. American business and the enterprise system have been affected as much by the courts as by the executive and legislative branches of government. Under our constitutional system, especially with an activist-minded Supreme Court, the judiciary may be the most important instrument for social, economic and political change.3 Later that same year, Powell joined the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ken Gormley Named 13Th President of Duquesne University
    WINTER 2016 Ken Gormley Named 13th President of Duquesne University Also in this issue: Papal Visit Looking for Life on Mars duq.edu 1 Contents is published three times annually by Duquesne University’s Office of Public Affairs Vol. 14, Number 2 Winter ’16 Editor Bridget Fare Associate Editor Megan Tressler Getting Babies Making A Papal Journey Editorial Committee 20 Moving 2 Timothy R. Austin, Ph.D. Mike Dillon, Ph.D. Rev. Raymond French, C.S.Sp. Ken Gormley Luci-Jo DiMaggio Dean McFarlin, Ph.D. 24 Named 13th John Plante President Sarah Sperry Adam Wasilko Debra Zugates Writing Michelle Boehm New Monument Memorializes a Familiar Ring ..............................................................................................6 Karen Ferrick-Roman DU Magazine, Media Initiatives Receive Awards .........................................................................................6 Christine Hudson Triple Play: Professor, Alumna Earn Three Awards at Emmys .............................................................7 Susan McCue Rose Ravasio Rangos School Celebrates 25th Anniversary with Special Gala .........................................................7 Tina Tuminella Gamma Phi to Celebrate Centennial ...................................................................................................................7 Joseph Vickless Strategic Rockwell Renovations.............................................................................................................................8 Bob Woodside Genesius Theater Dedication Kicks
    [Show full text]
  • 23, 1959 Page One Volume Lxxxii No
    v WEATHER MIDDLETOWN- Cloudy tadajr, tonight aad la- morrow, with a chanea of shew* BAYSHORE EDITION en tomorrow. High both days, SMS. Low tonight, 41. See page 2. Ked Mink 1MIM4 dally, lloadir through rrtdajr. mtertt u Meon4 Clan WW.IIM.Mi MIDDLETOWN, N. J.. MONDAY. NOVEMBER 23, 1959 PAGE ONE VOLUME LXXXII NO. 71 010c* u Mlddlttown. N«w Juny. undar Mditloau tntnr urmlt 4«U4 A«S. It, Ml. 7c PER COPY Labrecque Issue n Slides, Floods Still Unresolved Enforces Cause Havoc No Agreement Tavern Fire Sale Ban Seen as Senate Prosecutor Joins Goes in Finale Damage Put In Northwest Gloucester; 15 Train Trapped, Theodore J. Labrecque, Fair At $20,000 Haven resident and Red Bank at- Are Arrested Ike Probably torney, seems to be no closer to Man Awakened Faring Vacated; being approved by the state Sen- By Smoke; Five HACKENSACK (AP)- Bergen ate for a Superior Court vacancy County Prosecutor Guy W. Calissl Will Extend Worse to Come then he ever was, Firemen Injured utilized his entire 24-man staff yesterday to enforce the Sunday And whether he ever will be WEST KEANSBURG - The up- closing law. It resulted in the A-Test Ban SEATTLE (AP)—Massive remains a good question as the per story of Lakeview Inn, Rt. arrest of IS persons. rain-caused slides blocked Legislature's upper house goes 6, was destroyed by fire early Those arrested were owners, Would Go Along into its final session of the year major rail and highway today. Fire Chief William Hill managers and clerks who alleg- With UN Resolution today.
    [Show full text]
  • In This Issue Read About the Neuroscience of Judicial Decision-Making, the FY 2021-2022 Judicial Budget Request, a Department Spotlight on AOPC/IT and More
    Official newsletter of the Pennsylvania Judicial System Issue 2, 2021 In this issue Read about the neuroscience of judicial decision-making, the FY 2021-2022 Judicial Budget Request, a department spotlight on AOPC/IT and more. 1 (l) Justice Thomas G. Saylor (r) Chief Justice Max Baer position to the Supreme Court, namely, that of its counsel. Most recently, he has guided the court system through the Pa. Chief Justice unprecedented challenges posed by a public health crisis. Transition On April 1, Justice Max Baer assumed the role of Chief Justice. A distinguished member of the bench for more than three decades, Justice Baer served on the Court of After more than two decades on the Pennsylvania Common Pleas of Allegheny County from 1990 to 2003, Supreme Court, Chief Justice Thomas G. Saylor has with a majority of those years in the Family Division. transitioned from the role of chief justice, in anticipation of During his time in Family Court, he earned statewide his upcoming retirement in Dec. 2021. and national recognition for implementing far-reaching reforms to Juvenile Court as well as Domestic Relations. Under the state Constitution, a Justice of the Supreme He assumed his role as a member of the Supreme Court in Court must retire at the end of the calendar year in which 2003 and was retained in 2013. they reach the age of seventy-five. To ensure an orderly transition, Chief Justice Saylor announced he would “I have every confidence that Justice transfer the role of chief justice to Justice Max Baer before the end of his tenure, while remaining a Justice for the Baer, who has been my friend and balance of his term on the Court.
    [Show full text]
  • Summit Speaker Bios
    Summit Speakers Tina Amberboy has served as the Executive Director of the Supreme Court of Texas Permanent Judicial Commission for Children, Youth and Families (Children’s Commission) and the Court Improvement Director for Texas since 2007. She is responsible for developing and executing strategies of the Children's Commission, as well as the day to day operations of the Commission, which is charged with improving child welfare outcomes for children and families through judicial system reform and leadership. Prior to working for the Supreme Court, she worked as an attorney representing children and parents involved the Texas child welfare system. She earned a Juris Doctorate from Baylor Law School in 1996 and a Bachelor of Arts in Government from the University of Texas at Austin in 1993. Justice Max Baer was elected to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in November of 2003, assumed his duties on January 5, 2004 and was retained in 2013. Prior to his elevation to the Supreme Court, Justice Baer served on the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County from January of 1990 to December of 2003. He spent the first 9½ of those years in Family Division, and was the Administrative Judge of the Division for 5½ years. During his tenure, Justice Baer implemented far-reaching reforms to both Juvenile Court and Domestic Relations, earning him statewide and national recognition. Justice Baer eventually was assigned to the Civil Division, where he continued to distinguish himself until assuming his new duties on the Supreme Court. In acknowledgement of his innovations in family court, in 1997, Justice Baer was named Pennsylvania’s Adoption Advocate of the Year.
    [Show full text]
  • Boxer Died from Injuries in Fight 73 Years Ago," Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, January 28, 2010
    SURVIVOR DD/MMM /YEA RESULT RD SURVIVOR AG CITY STATE/CTY/PROV COUNTRY WEIGHT SOURCE/REMARKS CHAMPIONSHIP PRO/ TYPE WHERE CAUSALITY/LEGAL R E AMATEUR/ Richard Teeling 14-May 1725 KO Job Dixon Covent Garden (Pest London England ND London Journal, July 3, 1725; (London) Parker's Penny Post, July 14, 1725; Old Bailey Proceedings Online (www.oldbaileyonline.org), Richard Teeling, Pro Brain injury Ring Blows: Manslaughter Fields) killing: murder, 30th June, 1725. The Proceedings of the Old Bailey Ref: t17250630-26. Covent Garden was a major entertainment district in London. Both men were hackney coachmen. Dixon and another man, John Francis, had fought six or seven minutes. Francis tired, and quit. Dixon challenged anyone else. Teeling accepted. They briefly scuffled, and then Dixon fell and did not get up. He was carried home, where he died next day.The surgeon and apothecary opined that cause of death was either skull fracture or neck fracture. Teeling was convicted of manslaughter, and sentenced to branding. (Branding was on the thumb, with an "M" for murder. The idea was that a person could receive the benefit only once. Branding took place in the courtroom, Richard Pritchard 25-Nov 1725 KO 3 William Fenwick Moorfields London England ND Londonin front of Journal, spectators. February The practice12, 1726; did (London) not end Britishuntil the Journal, early nineteenth February 12,century.) 1726; Old Bailey Proceedings Online (www.oldbaileyonline.org), Richard Pro Brain injury Ring Misadventure Pritchard, killing: murder, 2nd March, 1726. The Proceedings of the Old Bailey Ref: t17260302-96. The men decided to settle a quarrel with a prizefight.
    [Show full text]
  • The Autism Puzzle: DU Researchers Examine the Pieces
    The Autism Puzzle: DU Researchers Examine the Pieces Also in this issue: The Spiritan Inspiration Century Club Inductees The Positive Impact of Nature Trails DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY MAGAZINE is published three times annually by The Positive Impact Duquesne University’s Office of Public Affairs of Nature Trails Vol. 7, Number 2 page 6 Winter 2009 Editor Bridget Fare Associate Editor Megan Tressler The Legacy Fund Editorial Board page 18 Ralph L. Pearson, Ph.D. Rod Dobish Edward Kocher, Ph.D. Kathleen Glenister Roberts, Ph.D. Rev. John Sawicki, C.S.Sp., Ph.D. Julie Shepard Cherith Simmer, R.N. Solving the Puzzle Writing page 26 Randy Cole Karen Ferrick-Roman Emily Goossen Carolina Pais-Barreto Beyers Rose Ravasio Kimberly Saunders Richard Tourtellott Also in this issue: Bob Woodside All in the Family ..........................................................................................................page 2 Design Catching Up With Christopher Koch ...........................................................................page 3 Jeremy Neeley Century Club Celebrates 30th Anniversary, Inducts Five New Members page 8 Taylor Tobias ........................ Pharmacy School Creates New Health Initiative to Duquesne University Magazine Help Uninsured Families .......................................................................................page 10 Office of Public Affairs DU Researchers Study Melatonin and Bone Loss ......................................................page 11 216 Fisher Hall Snapshots ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Citators of Pennsylvania*
    UNBOUND A Review of Legal History and Rare Books Journal of the Legal History and Rare Books Special Interest Section of the American Association of Law Libraries Volume 11 Number 2 Summer/Fall 2019 UNBOUND A Review of Legal History and Rare Books Unbound: A Review of Legal History and Rare Books (previously published as Unbound: An Annual Review of Legal History and Rare Books) is published by the Legal History and Rare Books Special Interest Section of the American Association of Law Libraries. Articles on legal history and rare books are both welcomed and en- couraged. Contributors need not be members of the Legal History and Rare Books Special Interest Section of the American Associa- tion of Law Libraries. Citation should follow any commonly-used citation guide. Cover Illustration: This depiction of an American Bison, en- graved by David Humphreys, was first published in Hughes Ken- tucky Reports (1803). It was adopted as the symbol of the Legal History and Rare Books Special Interest Section in 2007. BOARD OF EDITORS Mark Podvia, Editor-in-Chief University Librarian West Virginia University College of Law Library 101 Law School Drive, P.O. Box 6130 Morgantown, WV 26506 Phone: (304)293-6786 Email: [email protected] Noelle M. Sinclair, Executive Editor Head of Special Collections The University of Iowa College of Law 328 Boyd Law Building Iowa City, IA 52242 Phone (319)335-9002 [email protected] Kurt X. Metzmeier, Articles Editor Associate Director University of Louisville Law Library Belknap Campus, 2301 S. Third Louisville, KY 40292 Phone (502)852-6082 [email protected] Christine Anne George, Articles Editor Faculty Services Librarian Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2008 Guide to State Judicial Clerkship
    The 2012-13 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures The Vermont Public Interest Action Project Office of Career Services Vermont Law School Copyright © 2012 Vermont Law School Acknowledgement The 2012-13 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures is the product of many hours of work by the staff of the Vermont Law School Career Services Office. The 2012- 13 Guide also represents the contributions of a number of individuals and we would like to take this opportunity to thank them for their ideas and energy. In particular, we would like to acknowledge and thank the state court administrators, clerks and other personnel for providing the information necessary to compile this volume. Likewise, the assistance of career services offices in a number of jurisdictions is also very much appreciated. We believe The 2012-13 Guide represents a necessary tool for both career services professionals and law students considering judicial clerkships. We hope that it will prove useful and encourage other efforts to share information of use to all of us in the law school career services community. Abby Armstrong Director, Career Services Vermont Law School South Royalton, VT Copyright © 2012 by Vermont Law School. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, published, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from Vermont Law School, with the exception that the purchaser is permitted to grant employees and students access to the username and password. 2 State Judicial Clerkship Application Deadline Quick Reference Chart 2012-2013 Please check individual guide pages for more information.
    [Show full text]
  • TOWARD EQUAL JUSTICE for ALL: Report of the Civil Legal Justice Coalition to the Pennsylvania State Senate Judiciary Committee
    TOWARD EQUAL JUSTICE FOR ALL: Report of the Civil Legal Justice Coalition to the Pennsylvania State Senate Judiciary Committee AprilMarch 20142014 TABLE OF CONTENTS TOWARD EQUAL JUSTICE FOR ALL: Report of the Civil Legal Justice Coalition to the Pennsylvania State Senate Judiciary Committee April 2014 March 2014 Introduction and Background ................................................................................ 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................. 3 Findings ..................................................................................................................... 9 Finding 1: A longstanding and growing crisis exists in the unmet critical legal needs of low-income litigants who are unable to access legal services in Pennsylvania ............................................................ 9 Finding 2: The longstanding and growing civil legal justice crisis throughout the Commonwealth adversely affects the quality of justice for those unable to afford counsel, negatively impacts the Courts’ administration of justice, and undermines the rule of law ................ 18 Finding 3: Access to civil legal services in basic human needs cases provides significant economic and social benefits to individual litigants and the community, while significant economic and social harm to individuals and the community is inflicted when critical legal needs are not met....................................................................... 36 Finding 4: Pro
    [Show full text]
  • ‌Issue 1, 2018
    Issue 1, 2018 newsletter of the administrative office of pa courts 2018-2019 JUDICIAL BUDGET REQUEST Established more than three centuries ago, the Pennsylvania courts have a history of providing efficient, effective and fair access to justice for all who come before them. Since their inception however, the breadth and depth of services and support provided by the courts has evolved and expanded. Problem-solving courts, ensuring court access in a myriad of ways, and customizing programs to meet the needs of our youngest and oldest citizens are part of this evolution. Ample funding, along with sound and efficient fiscal management, allow us to continue fulfilling the courts’ traditional and expanded missions. AOPConnected takes a look at the Unified Judicial System’s 2018-2019 budget request to the legislative and executive branches. (continued on page 2) The judiciary receives FUNDING about ½ of 1% of the SOURCES state budget Since 2009, fee revenue has been used to fund a portion of the judiciary’s annual budget, currently about 12.4% of the total. PROPOSED $1.6 million Federal funds 2018-19 BUDGET $116.4 million Fees $355.5 million State tax funds SAVING DOLLARS With the assistance of the $10 MILLION IN General Assembly, the SAVINGS FOR 2017-18 governor, and the judiciary’s focus on efficiency and $632 thousand commitment to remaining Contract savings good stewards of taxpayer $4.3 million Benefits/salary dollars, this year’s budget $5.1 million Realignment of magisterial request seeks no new state district courts tax dollars for appropriation. Over the past 10 years, the judiciary has saved $91.5 million 2 JUDICIAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT: EVALUATING JUDICIAL RESOURCES As trial court work evolves and becomes more complex, evaluating current court operations, workload and resources is necessary to ensure that appropriate resources are available to manage and resolve court business.
    [Show full text]