DOCSLIB.ORG

Poverty, Programs, and Prices: How Adjusting for Costs of Living Would Affect Federal Benefit Eligibility

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Poverty, Programs, and Prices: How Adjusting for Costs of Living Would Affect Federal Benefit Eligibility Poverty, Programs, and Prices: How Adjusting for Costs of Living Would Affect Federal Benefit Eligibility by Leah B. Curran, Harold Wolman, Edward W. (Ned) Hill and Kimberly Furdell1 “Researchers and Findings policymakers Public policies rarely account for regional differences in living costs across the should closely country. Applying cost-of-living adjustments to measurements of economic well- examine how being and eligibility standards for social programs in 98 central cities reveals that: regional • Federal poverty guidelines, often used to determine eligibility for social programs, change significantly when indexed for cost of living (COL) differences. Out of 38 large differences in cities in higher-cost areas in the Northeast and West, 36 experience increases in the federal poverty guidelines. Conversely, more than half of the large cities located in lower-cost the cost of areas in the South and Midwest (38 of 60) see shifts in the opposite direction. living impact • The percentage, number, and distribution of families that are considered poor under federal poverty guidelines would change dramatically in many central cities the adequacy if regional differences in the cost of living were recognized. In high-cost areas on the East and West coasts, the poor population would increase substantially both in real and of programs to proportional terms. Cities like New York, NY and Los Angeles, CA rank among those boost incomes with the greatest increases in both the number and proportion of poor families under COL- adjusted standards. However, cities in lower-cost areas of the South and West, such as El and reduce Paso, TX and Shreveport, LA, have among the largest declines in the number and share of poor families once living costs are taken into account. poverty.” • Adjusting federal poverty guidelines for regional differences in the cost of living has a considerable impact on the number of families eligible for public programs. Overall, the share of families eligible for Early Head Start and Head Start as well as the National School Lunch Program would increase 29 percent in large cities across the country. San Francisco, CA, San Jose, CA, and Bridgeport, CT experience the largest increases in eligibility for these programs, while San Antonio, TX, Corpus Christi, TX, and El Paso, TX see the largest declines in the eligible population under COL-adjusted guidelines. Measures such as the federal poverty guidelines provide more accurate perceptions of the relative economic wellbeing of populations across the country when they consider regional cost-of-living differences. To craft effective public policies and programs for low-income families throughout the United States, researchers and policymakers should give further attention to the impact that regional COL differences have on program eligibility standards. In particular, policymakers can employ COL-adjusted measures to determine where state and local policies are most needed to supplement federal assistance targeted to low-income families and individuals. METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION MARCH 2008 1 Introduction low when compared to other the few programs that take living major cities, making it doubtful cost differences into account use that the magnitude of poverty in imprecise or outdated methods Regional cost of living affects Cleveland is in fact higher than in for estimating interarea cost of the quality of life that individuals many other large metropolitan ar- living (COL) differentials. and families experience in differ- eas. Still, the perception of being Similarly, economic and com- ent places. The national median home to the highest proportion munity development programs household income for a family of urban poor in the country may such as the HOPE VI program of four ($46,242 in 2005), for affect confidence in the region and the Community Develop- instance, purchases a much higher among potential investors, unduly ment Block Grant program also standard of living in Wichita, KS depressing growth. fail to account for regional living 2 than in New York City, NY. Yet, Ignoring cost of living differ- cost differences when computing policymakers rarely consider the ences also has important impacts community need levels. In addi- impact of cost of living differences on the allocation of federal tion, the current tax code, which on quality of life or factor these resources for low-income work- is where an increasing amount differences into decisions about ing families because the buying of social policy expenditures oc- the allocation of federal resources power of government benefits, cur, also neglects to account for for working families. like the Earned Income Tax regional COL differences. As a Failing to accurately account for Credit, varies widely across result, these federal investments cost of living differences influ- places. According to the Con- may be systematically providing ences both our perceptions of the gressional Research Service more of a relative benefit to low- relative economic wellbeing of (CRS), there were approximately cost areas of the country, and less places as well as the distribution 85 federal means-tested programs of a benefit to high-cost areas. of public policies. In terms of our providing cash and noncash This paper first presents the perceptions, both researchers and benefits in 2002 to more than 22 history of the debate surrounding policymakers use income-based million individuals every year cost of living adjustments and measures—particularly median in the United States.4 Eligibil- discusses the current methods household income, per capita ity criteria for these programs used to account for regional COL income, and the proportion of the are typically based upon one of differences. After reviewing population with incomes below five measures: (1) the federal the methodology, the paper then the poverty level—to gauge the poverty guidelines or the Cen- analyzes the impact of applying relative economic wellbeing of sus Bureau’s poverty thresholds a cost of living adjustment to the an area’s residents. However, (or a combination of the two), federal poverty guidelines in 98 unadjusted income-based mea- (2) state or area median income, central cities across the country. sures inevitably yield misleading (3) the “Lower Living Standard It also evaluates how COL adjust- results by understating economic Income Level” determined by the ments to the poverty guidelines wellbeing in low-cost areas of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, (4) would affect the number of country and overstating wellbeing 3 an absolute monetary standard or families considered poor in these in high-cost areas. (5) an income level considered communities. Focusing on two Such mistaken perceptions to indicate “need” (CRS, 2003).5 programs that use the federal of wellbeing may have serious Most programs do not take living poverty guidelines (or multiples adverse consequences for cities costs into consideration when thereof) to determine eligibility, and their residents. For instance, determining program eligibil- the paper then explores the extent the Census Bureau reported that in ity. Exceptions include certain to which COL adjustments would 2003 a larger proportion of people programs with qualification affect eligibility for means-tested were living below the national standards based upon state or area programs. By analyzing the im- poverty threshold in Cleveland, median income, the two programs plications of accounting for COL Ohio than in any other major city that are based on the Lower differences in these cases, this in the nation, making Cleveland Living Standard Income Level6 paper highlights the potential role the poorest city in America (Proc- and, in some cases, those that are of COL adjustments in contribut- tor et al., 2003). However, Cleve- based on multiples of the federal ing to research that presents more land’s living costs are relatively poverty standards.7 Furthermore, METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION MARCH 2008 2 accurate perceptions of economic behavior by subsidizing people in and residential opportunities, and wellbeing across regions and in higher-cost areas, allowing them less human capital to employ to crafting policies better targeted to to stay when they would have take advantage of those oppor- low-income families. The paper otherwise moved to a lower-cost tunities. Subsequently, poor and concludes with a discussion of community. This would result low-income households have a implications for policymakers in overcrowding in high-amenity relatively lower degree of inter- and researchers. areas and under-populated lower- metropolitan residential mobility amenity areas.8 and choice than the rest of the However, in several cases this Background population (Gimpel, 1999). As a argument does not bear out in result, poor people often bear the practice, underscoring the im- costs of amenities through higher The Debate portance of accounting for COL housing prices, regardless of differences, especially where whether or how much they actu- Policymakers and existing low-income individuals are ally value them. public policy often do not ac- concerned. First, while regional Therefore, while low-income count for COL differences variations in housing prices people may be enjoying some because amenities that improve likely capture amenity or disa- of the amenities associated with quality of life are thought to be menity differences among areas high-cost metropolitan areas, capitalized into land and hous- (Kaplow, 1995), housing is only they have a limited opportunity to ing costs. Attributes of an area one component of disparities in make choices between residential such as the weather, the regional the regional cost of living. Varia- locations compared to the rest labor market, the culture, the tions in the cost of food, cloth- of the population. In this light, crime rate, the amount of pol- ing, health care, utilities, etc. can when households are immobile, lution, and the natural environ- reflect real differences in supply adjusting for COL differences is ment, for instance, are thought costs and comprise important economically efficient because to be reflected in the differences differences in the quality of life.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Standard of Living in America Today
    STANDARD OF LIVING IN AMERICA TODAY Standard of Living is one of the three areas measured by the American Human Development Index, along with health and education. Standard of living is measured using median personal earnings, the wages and salaries of all workers 16 and over. While policymakers and the media closely track Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and judge America’s progress by it, the American Human Development Index tracks median personal earnings, a better gauge of ordinary Americans’ standard of living. The graph below chronicles two stories of American economic history over the past 35 years. One is the story of extraordinary economic growth as told by GDP; the other is a story of economic stagnation as told by earnings, which have barely budged since 1974 (both in constant dollars). GDP vs. Median Earnings: Change Since 1974 STRIKING FINDINGS IN STANDARD OF LIVING FROM THE MEASURE OF AMERICA 2010-2011: The Measure of America 2010-2011 explores the median personal earnings of various groups—by state, congressional district, metro area, racial/ethnic groups, and for men and women—and reveals alarming gaps that threaten the long-term well-being of our nation: American women today have higher overall levels of educational attainment than men. Yet men earn an average of $11,000 more. In no U.S. states do African Americans, Latinos, or Native Americans earn more than Asian Americans or whites. By the end of the 2007-9 recession, unemployment among the bottom tenth of U.S. households, those with incomes below $12,500, was 31 percent, a rate higher than unemployment in the worst year of the Great Depression; for households with incomes of $150,000 and over, unemployment was just over 3 percent, generally considered as full employment.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of Poverty Prevalence in China: New Evidence from Four
    An Evaluation of Poverty Prevalence in China: New Evidence from Four Recent Surveys Chunni ZHANG, Qi XU, Xiang ZHOU, Xiaobo ZHANG, Yu XIE Abstract In this paper, we calculate and compare the poverty incidence rate in China using four nationally representative surveys: the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS, 2010), the Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS, 2010), the Chinese Household Finance Survey (CHFS, 2011), and the Chinese Household Income Project (CHIP, 2007). Using both international and official domestic poverty standards, we show that poverty prevalence at the national, rural, and urban levels based on the CFPS, CGSS and CHFS are much higher than official estimation and those based on the CHIP. The study highlights the importance of using independent datasets to validate official statistics of public and policy concern in contemporary China. 1 An Evaluation of Poverty Prevalence in China: New Evidence from Four Recent Surveys Since the economic reform began in 1978, China’s economic growth has not only greatly improved the average standard of living in China but also been credited with lifting hundreds of millions of Chinese out of poverty. According to one report (Ravallion and Chen, 2007), the poverty rate dropped from 53% in 1981 to 8% in 2001. Because of the vast size of the Chinese population, even a seemingly low poverty rate of 8% implies that there were still more than 100 million Chinese people living in poverty, a sizable subpopulation exceeding the national population of the Philippines and falling slightly short of the total population of Mexico. Hence, China still faces an enormous task in eradicating poverty.
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Development Index (HDI)
    Contribution to Beyond Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Name of the indicator/method: The Human Development Index (HDI) Summary prepared by Amie Gaye: UNDP Human Development Report Office Date: August, 2011 Why an alternative measure to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) The limitation of GDP as a measure of a country’s economic performance and social progress has been a subject of considerable debate over the past two decades. Well-being is a multidimensional concept which cannot be measured by market production or GDP alone. The need to improve data and indicators to complement GDP is the focus of a number of international initiatives. The Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi Commission1 identifies at least eight dimensions of well-being—material living standards (income, consumption and wealth), health, education, personal activities, political voice and governance, social connections and relationships, environment (sustainability) and security (economic and physical). This is consistent with the concept of human development, which focuses on opportunities and freedoms people have to choose the lives they value. While growth oriented policies may increase a nation’s total wealth, the translation into ‘functionings and freedoms’ is not automatic. Inequalities in the distribution of income and wealth, unemployment, and disparities in access to public goods and services such as health and education; are all important aspects of well-being assessment. What is the Human Development Index (HDI)? The HDI serves as a frame of reference for both social and economic development. It is a summary measure for monitoring long-term progress in a country’s average level of human development in three basic dimensions: a long and healthy life, access to knowledge and a decent standard of living.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Foundations of Authoritarian Rule
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations 2017 The conomicE Foundations of Authoritarian Rule Clay Robert Fuller University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Fuller, C. R.(2017). The Economic Foundations of Authoritarian Rule. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/4202 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ECONOMIC FOUNDATIONS OF AUTHORITARIAN RULE by Clay Robert Fuller Bachelor of Arts West Virginia State University, 2008 Master of Arts Texas State University, 2010 Master of Arts University of South Carolina, 2014 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2017 Accepted by: John Hsieh, Major Professor Harvey Starr, Committee Member Timothy Peterson, Committee Member Gerald McDermott, Committee Member Cheryl L. Addy, Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School © Copyright Clay Robert Fuller, 2017 All Rights Reserved. ii DEDICATION for Henry, Shannon, Mom & Dad iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Special thanks goes to God, the unconditional love and support of my wife, parents and extended family, my dissertation committee, Alex, the institutions of the United States of America, the State of South Carolina, the University of South Carolina, the Department of Political Science faculty and staff, the Walker Institute of International and Area Studies faculty and staff, the Center for Teaching Excellence, undergraduate political science majors at South Carolina who helped along the way, and the International Center on Nonviolent Conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Living Wage Report Urban Vietnam
    Living Wage Report Urban Vietnam Ho Chi Minh City With focus on the Garment Industry March 2016 By: Research Center for Employment Relations (ERC) A spontaneous market for workers outside a garment factory in Ho Chi Minh City. Photo courtesy of ERC Series 1, Report 10 June 2017 Prepared for: The Global Living Wage Coalition Under the Aegis of Fairtrade International, Forest Stewardship Council, GoodWeave International, Rainforest Alliance, Social Accountability International, Sustainable Agriculture Network, and UTZ, in partnership with the ISEAL Alliance and Richard Anker and Martha Anker Living Wage Report for Urban Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam with focus on garment industry SECTION I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 3 1. Background ........................................................................................................................... 4 2. Living wage estimate ............................................................................................................ 5 3. Context ................................................................................................................................. 6 3.1 Ho Chi Minh City .......................................................................................................... 7 3.2 Vietnam’s garment industry ........................................................................................ 9 4. Concept and definition of a living wage ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Is There Such a Thing As an Absolute Poverty Line Over Time?
    Is There Such a Thing as an Absolute Poverty Line Over Time? Evidence from the United States, Britain, Canada, and Australia on the Income Elasticity of the Poverty Line by Gordon M. Fisher (An earlier version of this paper was presented October 28, 1994, at the Sixteenth Annual Research Conference of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management in Chicago, Illinois. A 9-page summary of this paper is available on the Department of Health and Human Services Poverty Guidelines Web site at http://aspe.os.dhhs.gov/poverty/papers/elassmiv.htm.) For a brief summary of the U.S. evidence in this paper, see Gordon M. Fisher, "Relative or Absolute--New Light on the Behavior of Poverty Lines Over Time," GSS/SSS Newsletter [Joint Newsletter of the Government Statistics Section and the Social Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association], Summer 1996, pp. 10-12. (This article is available on the Department of Health and Human Services Poverty Guidelines Web site at http://aspe.os.dhhs.gov/poverty/papers/relabs.htm.)) The views expressed in this paper are those of the author, and do not represent the position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. August 1995 (202)690-6143 [elastap4] CONTENTS Introduction....................................................1 Evidence from the United States--General Comment................2 Evidence from the United States--Quantitative Studies of Standard Budgets...........................................3 Evidence from the United States--Additional Quantitative Data on Standard
    [Show full text]
  • Chronic Poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa Achievements, Problems and Prospects1
    Chronic Poverty in sub-Saharan Africa Achievements, 1 Problems and Prospects 1 The University of Manchester, Insititute for Development Policy and Management and Brooks World Poverty Institute. [email protected] 1 Introduction: The Global Poverty Agenda and the Africa Despite significant progress made in reducing poverty since 2000, there is general consensus that poverty remains a major policy challenge especially in sub-Saharan Africa. On current evidence the global target for MDG1 (halving poverty by 2015) is likely to be achieved thanks mostly to rapid gains in China and India. It should however be remembered that there will still be another half of the ‘original 1990 benchmark poor’ living in poverty. Recent revisions suggest that the figure may be as many as 1.4 billion people, many of who will be Africans2. Probably a third of the people who will remain in poverty will have lived in poverty for most if not all their lives. These are often called the chronically poor. Estimates suggest that between 30 and 40 per cent of up to 443 million people living in chronic poverty are in sub-Saharan Africa.3 Clearly present and future progress in poverty reduction after the MDGs will depend to a large extent on what happens to this core group living in chronic poverty especially in Africa. Current evidence suggests that although the proportion of people living in poverty has declined4 from 58 per cent in 1990 to 51 per cent in 2005,5 sub-Saharan Africa will likely miss the target for MDG1. In fact, the actual numbers of Africans living in poverty has been increasing6.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter II: Poverty: the Official Numbers
    13 Chapter II Poverty: the official numbers Monitoring and reporting on the levels, patterns and trends of poverty have become a standard part of anti-poverty programme design and assessment. With the steady internationalization of the poverty agenda, development or- ganizations, both multilateral and bilateral, have demanded a template for regular reporting, and new concepts, definitions, data sets and instruments have been generated to meet this demand. Every major development organiza- tion produces its own report card, often ranking countries in terms of their performance. Special interest usually attaches to the annual Human Develop- ment Reports of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and, of late, the Millennium Development Goals progress reports; however, it is perhaps the reports of the World Bank on the incidence of poverty based on the dollar-a-day criterion that generate the greatest interest and commentary in the development community. Statistics have an awesome power, and these global accounting exercises present statistical data to journalists, researchers, practitioners and activists as irrefutable facts. What, then, are those ostensible facts? The present chapter provides a summary of the currently most influ- ential versions, largely associated with the World Bank’s dollar-a-day poverty estimates. Global poverty trends: 1981-20051 Poverty is most often measured in monetary terms, captured by levels of in- come or consumption per capita or per household. The commitment made in the Millennium Development Goals to eradicate absolute poverty by halving the number of people living on less than US$ 1.25 dollar a day represents the most publicized example of an income-focused approach to poverty.
    [Show full text]
  • Anna Fadeeva A) Poverty in Bangladesh
    Anna Fadeeva A comparative study of poverty in China, India, Bangladesh, and Philippines. Under review in: University of South California Research Paper Series in Sociology a) Poverty in Bangladesh Banladesh is one of the world's most densely populated countries with 150 million people, 26% of whom live below the national poverty line of US $2 per day. In addition, child malnutrition rates are currently at 48%, in condition that is tied to the low social status of women in Bangladeshi society. While Bangladesh suffers from many problems such as poor infrastructure, political instability, corruption, and insufficient power supplies, the country's economy has grown 5-6% per year since 1996. However, Bangladesh still remains a poor, overpopulated, and inefficiently-governed nation with about 45% of the Bangladeshis being employed in the agriculture sector. Rural and urban poverty The World Bank announced in June 2013 that Bangladesh had reduced the number of people living in poverty from 63 million in 2000 to 47 million in 2010, despite a total population that had grown to approximately 150 million. This means that Bangladesh will reach its first United Nations-established Millennium Development Goal, that of poverty reduction, two years ahead of the 2015 deadline. Bangladesh is also making progress in reducing its poverty rate to 26 percent of the population. Since the 1990s, there has been a declining trend of poverty by 1 percent each year, with the help of international assistance. According to the 2010 household survey by the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, 17.6 percent of the population were found to be under the poverty line.
    [Show full text]
  • Dibao) 2018-022 Programme in August 2016 China
    Global Evaluating the Development effectiveness of Institute the rural minimum Working Paper living standard Series guarantee (Dibao) 2018-022 programme in August 2016 China Nanak Kakwani1, Shi Li2, Xiaobing Wang3, Mengbing Zhu4 1 China Institute of Income Distribution, Beijing Normal University, P.R. China, and School of Economics, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Email: [email protected] 2 China Institute of Income Distribution, Beijing Normal University, P. R. China. Email: [email protected] 3 Department of Economics, The University of Manchester, UK, and China Institute of Income Distribution, Beijing Normal University, China. Email: [email protected]. 4 China Institute of Income Distribution, Beijing Normal University, P. R. China. Email: [email protected] ISBN: 978-1-909336-58-2 Cite this paper as: Nanak Kakwani1, Shi Li, 2 Xiaobing Wang,3 Mengbing Zhu4 (2018) Evaluating the effectiveness of the rural minimum living standard guarantee (Dibao) programme in China. GDI Working Paper 2018-22. Manchester: The University of Manchester. www.gdi.manchester.ac.uk Abstract China’s rural minimum living standard guarantee programme (Dibao) is the largest social safety-net programme in the world. Given the scale and the popularity of rural Dibao, rigorous evaluation is needed to demonstrate the extent to which the programme meets its intended objective of reducing poverty. This paper develops new methods and uses data from the 2013 Chinese Household Income Project (CHIP2013) to examine the targeting performance of the rural Dibao programme. The paper has found that the rural Dibao programme suffers from very low targeting accuracy, high exclusion error, and inclusion error, and yields a significant negative social rate of return.
    [Show full text]
  • For: Review Republic of Angola Country Strategic Opportunities Programme 2019-2024
    Document: EB 2018/125/R.26/Rev.1 Agenda: 5(d)(ii) Date: 30 November 2018 E Distribution: Public Original: English Republic of Angola Country Strategic Opportunities Programme 2019-2024 Note to Executive Board representatives Focal points: Technical questions: Dispatch of documentation: Abla Benhammouche Deirdre McGrenra Country Director Chief East and Southern Africa Division Governing Bodies Tel.: +39 06 5459 2226 Tel.: +39 06 5459 2374 e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] Bernadette M. Mukonyora Programme Analyst Tel.: +39 06 5459 2695 e-mail: [email protected] Executive Board — 125th Session Rome, 12-14 December 2018 For: Review EB 2018/125/R.26/Rev.1 Contents Contents Abbreviations and acronyms ii Map of IFAD-funded and development partner operations in the country iii Executive summary v I. Country diagnosis 1 II. Previous lessons and results 4 III. Strategic objectives 5 IV. Sustainable results 7 V. Successful delivery 9 Appendices Appendix I: COSOP results management framework Appendix II: Agreement at completion point of last country programme evaluation Appendix III: COSOP preparation process including preparatory studies, stakeholder consultation and events Appendix IV: Natural resources management and climate change adaptation: Background, national policies and IFAD intervention strategies Appendix V: Country at a glance Appendix VI: Concept note: Angola Smallholder Resilience Enhancement Programme (SREP) Appendix VII:Poverty, targeting, gender and social inclusion strategy Key files Key file 1: Rural poverty
    [Show full text]
  • Bangladesh Living Wage Report for Distribution 9.9.07.Pub
    Bangladesh Sustainable Living Wage Report Sustainable Living Wage In Bangladesh Report Project Director: Ruth Rosenbaum, PhD CREA Project Team: David M. Bolan Neena C. Kapoor HSI Project Coordinator Sorowar Chowdhury HSI Project Team Nilufar Yasmin Hasan Imam Akbor Hossain Khan Sumona Chowdhury CSCC Team Leader Saiful Millat CSCC Auditor Team CREA: Center for Reflection, Education and Action, Inc. P.O. Box 2507, Hartford, CT 06146-2507 TEL: + 860.527.0455 e-mail: [email protected] FAX: + 860.216.1072 www.crea-inc.org © CREA 2007 1 TABLE of CONTENTS Sustainable Living Wage and the Reality that is Bangladesh…………………… 1 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………. 2 Definitions of Wage/Income Levels……………………………………………….... 5 Advantages of the Purchasing Power Index Methodology………………………. 6 Housing and Related Costs………………………………………………………….. 7 Sustainable Living Wage Standard for Housing……………………………..8 Water: Potable and Non-Potable………………………………………………...........8 Sustainable Living Wage Standard for Water…………………….....……….9 Sustainable Living Wage Standards for Nutrition and Other Consumables ………………………………………………......... 10 Health and Hygiene Consumables………………………………………………......12 Clothing…………………………………………………………………………………13 Transportation………………………………………………………………………….14 Non-Consumables……………………………………………………………………..15 Pricing Lists…………………………………………………………………………….16 Water Situation in Bangladesh……………………………………………………….17 Data Sources: Where We Priced…………………………………………………….18 Methodology……………………………………………………………………………19 Calculations of the Sustainable Living Wage……………………………………….23 Wages in Bangladesh…………………………………………………………...…….24 Moving Forward…………………………………………………………………...…...26 Bangladesh Sustainable Living Wage Report THE SUSTAINABLE LIVING WAGE and THE REALITY THAT IS BANGLADESH There are many ways to look at Bangladesh. It is an inviting and enchanting country even while the levels of poverty are staggering. It is a country that has made great strides towards some of the UN Millennium Goals even while it has one of the highest levels of poverty in Asia.
    [Show full text]