DOCSLIB.ORG

Libel As Malpractice: News Media Ethics and the Standard of Care

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Libel As Malpractice: News Media Ethics and the Standard of Care Fordham Law Review Volume 53 Issue 3 Article 3 1984 Libel as Malpractice: News Media Ethics and the Standard of Care Todd F. Simon Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Todd F. Simon, Libel as Malpractice: News Media Ethics and the Standard of Care, 53 Fordham L. Rev. 449 (1984). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol53/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LIBEL AS MALPRACTICE: NEWS MEDIA ETHICS AND THE STANDARD OF CARE TODD F. SIMON* INTRODUCTION D OCTORS, lawyers, and journalists share a strong common bond: They live in fear of being haled into court where the trier of fact will pass judgment on how they have performed their duties. When the doc- tor or lawyer is sued by a patient or client, it is a malpractice case.I The standard by which liability is determined is whether the doctor or lawyer acted with the knowledge, skill and care ordinarily possessed and em- ployed by members of the profession in good standing.' Accordingly, if * Assistant Professor and Director, Journalism/Law Institute, Michigan State Uni- versity School of Journalism; Member, Nebraska Bar. 1. W. Keeton, D. Dobbs, R. Keeton & D. Owen, Prosser and Keeton on Torts, § 32, at 185-86 (5th ed. 1984) [hereinafter cited as Prosser and Keeton]; see, e.g., Lucas v. Harem, 56 Cal. 2d 583, 591, 364 P.2d 685, 689, 15 Cal. Rptr. 821, 825 (1961) (en banc) (legal malpractice), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 987 (1962); Cross v. Huttenlocher, 185 Conn. 390, 393, 440 A.2d 952, 954 (1981) (medical malpractice); Sullivan v. Henry, 160 Ga. App. 791, 791-92, 287 S.E.2d 652, 653 (1982) (medical malpractice); McPherson v. Ellis, 305 N.C. 266, 266, 287 S.E.2d 892, 893 (1982) (medical malpractice); Young v. Park, - RI. -,-, 417 A.2d 889, 890-91 (1980) (medical malpractice), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1119 (1981); Siebert v. Fowler, 637 P.2d 255, 256 (Wyo. 1981) (medical malpractice). 2. Prosser and Keeton, supra note 1, § 32, at 186-87; see, e.g., Lucas v. Harnm, 56 Cal. 2d 583, 591, 364 P.2d 685, 689, 15 Cal. Rptr. 821, 825 (1961) (en banc), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 987 (1962); Cross v. Huttenlocher, 185 Conn. 390, 393, 440 A.2d 952, 954 (1981); Sullivan v. Henry, 160 Ga.. App. 791, 800, 287 S.E.2d 652, 659 (1982); McPher- son v. Ellis, 305 N.C. 266, 270, 287 S.E.2d 892, 895 (1982); Young v. Park, - ILL -,-, 417 A.2d 889, 893 (1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1119 (1981); Siebert v. Fowler, 637 P.2d 255, 257 (Wyo. 1981). Some courts read the standard as requiring a doctor or lawyer to possess the skill of the "average" member of the profession. Prosser and Keeton, supra note 1, § 32, at 187; see, eg., Green v. United States, 530 F. Supp. 633, 642 (E.D. Wis. 1982), aff'd, 709 F.2d 1158 (7th Cir. 1983); Spike v. Sellett, 102 Ill. App. 3d 270, 273, 430 N.E.2d 597, 600 (1981); Coleman v. McCarthy, 53 RI. 267, 269, 165 A. 900, 901 (1933). Many commentators and courts, however, argue that this reading of the standard is misleading because the malpractice standard only considers those in good professional standing and looks only to their minimum common skill. Prosser and Keeton, supra note 1, § 32, at 187; see Shevak v. United States, 528 F. Supp. 427, 432 (N.D. Tex. 1981). A doctor, such as a "special- ist," who represents himself as having greater skill is held to that higher standard of care. Prosser and Keeton, supra note 1, § 32, at 187; see Salis v. United States, 522 F. Supp. 989, 994 (M.D. Pa. 1981); Coyne v. Cirilli, 45 Or. App. 177, 182, 607 P.2d 1383, 1386 (1980). The malpractice standard has been applied most often in actions against doctors. Prosser and Keeton, supra note 1, § 32, at 186. The traditional standard held the doctor to the same standard of care as other doctors in the same community. See Prosser and Keeton, supra note 1, § 32, at 187-89. The country doctor who did not possess the same equipment and facilities or have the same opportunities for learning as did doctors in large cities was held to a lower standard of care. Id. Today, as courts begin to recognize that doctors share similar training, doctors are being held to similar standards throughout the country. Id. at 188. The "locality" or "community" rule is becoming a thing of the past as a general national standard is being applied in medical malpractice cases. See, ,,g., Sullivan v. Henry, 160 Ga. App. 791,800, FORDHAM LAW REVIEW [Vol. 53 the doctor or lawyer acted as other lawyers or doctors would have under similar circumstances, he is generally deemed not to have been negligent, as a matter of law.3 In libel cases, if the plaintiff is a public figure or public official, he must prove that the journalist acted with actual malice in order to establish liability.4 If the plaintiff is a private figure, he must prove that the jour- nalist was at least negligent.5 Thus in either case the plaintiff must prove that the journalist was at fault. Unlike actions against doctors or law- yers, however, a libel suit against a journalist is treated as a general tort action.6 Accordingly, in libel cases involving private plaintiffs, most courts instruct the jury that its task is simply to determine whether the defendant acted reasonably.7 The second half of the question-"in light of prevailing standards"- is often not addressed.8 Consequently, a jour- nalist's actions are judged against those deemed reasonable by other members of the public.9 What a jury has in mind when applying this ordinary negligence standard unaided by evidence of journalistic prac- tices is anyone's guess.1" Similarly, in applying the actual malice stan- 287 S.E.2d 652, 659 (1982); Brune v. Belinkoff, 354 Mass. 102, 107-09, 235 N.E.2d 793, 797-98 (1968); King v. Williams, 276 S.C. 478, 481-82, 279 S.E.2d 618, 619-20 (1981); Pederson v. Dumouchel, 72 Wash. 2d 73, 78-79, 431 P.2d 973, 977-78 (1967) (en bane); Waltz, The Rise and GradualFall of the Locality Rule in Medical MalpracticeLitigation, 18 De Paul L. Rev. 408, 415-18 (1969); Note, Medical Specialities and the Locality Rule, 14 Stan. L. Rev. 884, 886-91 (1962) [hereinafter cited as Medical Specialities]. Similarly, a professionwide standard is generally applied in legal malpractice cases. See, e.g., Letino v. Fringe Employee Plans, Inc., 611 F.2d 474, 480 (3d Cir. 1979); Southland Mechanical Constructors Corp. v. Nixen, 119 Cal. App. 3d. 417, 426 n.3, 173 Cal. Rptr. 917, 921 n.3 (1981); Kurtenbach v. TeKippe, 260 N.W.2d 53, 56 (Iowa 1977); Vitale v. Coyne Realty, Inc., 66 A.D.2d 562, 567, 414 N.Y.S.2d 388, 392 (1979) (Callihan, J., dissenting in part). 3. See, e.g., Lucas v. Hamm, 56 Cal. 2d 583, 591, 364 P.2d 685, 689, 15 Cal. Rptr. 821, 825 (1961) (en banc), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 987 (1962); Cross v. Huttenlocher, 185 Conn. 390, 393, 440 A.2d 952, 954 (1981); Sullivan v. Henry, 160 Ga. App. 791, 800, 287 S.E.2d 652, 659 (1982); Spike v. Sellett, 102 Ill. App. 3d 270, 273, 430 N.E.2d 597, 600 (1981); Young v. Park, - R.I. -,-, 417 A.2d 889, 893 (1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1119 (1981); Siebert v. Fowler, 637 P.2d 255, 257 (Wyo. 1981). There are some instances, however, in which the doctor or lawyer will be liable even though he conformed with professional standards of practice. See infra note 156 and accompanying text. 4. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 279-80 (1964); see Curtis Pub- lishing Co. v. Butts, 388 U.S. 130, 155 (1967). See infra notes 54-65 and accompanying text. 5. See Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 347 (1974) (states may define standard but cannot "impose liability without fault"). See infra notes 28-30, 73 and ac- companying text. 6. See, e.g., Troman v. Wood, 62 I11.2d 184, 197, 340 N.E.2d 292, 298 (1975); Mc- Call v. Courier-Journal & Louisville Times Co., 623 S.W.2d 882, 895 (Ky. 1981) (Lukow- sky, J., concurring), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 975 (1982); Schrottman v. Barnicle, 386 Mass. 627, 641-42, 437 N.E.2d 205, 215 (1982); Memphis Publishing Co. v. Nichols, 569 S.W.2d 412, 418 (Tenn. 1978); Taskett v. King Broadcasting Co., 86 Wash. 2d 439, 445, 546 P.2d 81, 85 (1976) (en banc). See infra notes 33-44 and accompanying text. 7. See infra notes 38-40 and accompanying text. 8. See infra notes 38-40 and accompanying text. 9. See infra notes 38-40 and accompanying text. 10. See infra notes 38-40, 52 and accompanying text. 1984] LIBEL AS MALPRA CTICE dard for public figure plaintiffs, liability may ensue only if there has been an extreme departure from the standards of the reasonable journalist.II The jury, however, is given little guidance as to what those practices 12 are.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wrongful Life in the Age of CRISPR-CAS: Using the Legal Fiction of “The Conceptual Being” to Redress Wrongful Gamete Manipulation
    Wrongful Life in the Age of CRISPR-CAS: Using the Legal Fiction of “The Conceptual Being” to Redress Wrongful Gamete Manipulation Barbara Pfeffer Billauer J.D., M.A., Ph.D.* ABSTRACT Virtually all ‘wrongful life’ actions (claims brought by children for pre-birth injuries) are denied. The basis for this doctrine pivots around the refusal to allow recompense for actions which cause harm, but also result in the child’s birth. We, therefore, are faced with a legal lacuna, where children suffering serious harms as a result of the latest reproductive technologies are legal orphans. This Article details the avenues of potential harm caused by modern reproductive technologies, which I call wrongful genetic manipulation (WGM), where the injured child would have no right of action. To address this void, I create a novel remedy via a legal fiction, “the conceptual being,” which would enable these children to bypass current restrictions and claim an expanded class of damages, including pain and suffering, emotional injury, and unjust enrichment. *About the author: Dr. Billauer holds academic appointments at the University of Porto, Portugal, where she is a Professor in the International Program on Bioethics, and the Institute of World Politics in Washington, D.C., where she is a research Professor of Scientific Statecraft. She has advanced degrees in law and public health and sits on the UNESCO committee currently compiling a Casebook on Bioethics. She has also edited Professor Amnon Carmi’s Casebook on Bioethics for Judges. Prior to transitioning to academia, Dr. Billauer practiced medical malpractice, toxic tort, and products liability law.
    [Show full text]
  • HB 651 Recovery of Damages in Claims for Medical Negligence SPONSOR(S): Roach TIED BILLS: IDEN./SIM
    HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS BILL #: HB 651 Recovery of Damages in Claims for Medical Negligence SPONSOR(S): Roach TIED BILLS: IDEN./SIM. BILLS: SB 1112 REFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR or BUDGET/POLICY CHIEF 1) Civil Justice & Property Rights Subcommittee 18 Y, 0 N Brascomb Jones 2) Judiciary Committee SUMMARY ANALYSIS A "wrongful death" action arises when a person dies from injuries sustained as a result of a wrongful act or omission by the defendant. In a wrongful death action, Florida's Wrongful Death Act limits the types of damages recoverable by certain parties as follows: The deceased’s estate may recover for: o Lost wages, benefits, and other earnings; o Medical and funeral expenses that were paid by the estate; and o The value the estate could reasonably have been expected to acquire if the deceased had lived. Specified family members may recover for: o The value of support and services the deceased provided; o Loss of companionship and guidance; o Mental and emotional pain and suffering, in specified cases; and o Compensation for medical and funeral expenses the family member has paid for the deceased. In an ordinary wrongful death action (such as a suit based on a death caused by an automobile accident), parents can recover for their mental pain and suffering for the loss of an adult child when there is no surviving spouse or child. However, when the wrongful death action is based on a medical malpractice claim, parents cannot recover for their mental pain and suffering for the loss of an adult child.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethics in Photojournalism: Past, Present, and Future
    Ethics in Photojournalism: Past, Present, and Future By Daniel R. Bersak S.B. Comparative Media Studies & Electrical Engineering/Computer Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2003 SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMPARATIVE MEDIA STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN COMPARATIVE MEDIA STUDIES AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SEPTEMBER, 2006 Copyright 2006 Daniel R. Bersak, All Rights Reserved The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of Author: _____________________________________________________ Department of Comparative Media Studies, August 11, 2006 Certified By: ___________________________________________________________ Edward Barrett Senior Lecturer, Department of Writing Thesis Supervisor Accepted By: __________________________________________________________ William Uricchio Professor of Comparative Media Studies Director Ethics In Photojournalism: Past, Present, and Future By Daniel R. Bersak Submitted to the Department of Comparative Media Studies, School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences on August 11, 2006, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Comparative Media Studies Abstract Like writers and editors, photojournalists are held to a standard of ethics. Each publication has a set of rules, sometimes written, sometimes unwritten, that governs what that publication considers to be a truthful and faithful representation of images to the public. These rules cover a wide range of topics such as how a photographer should act while taking pictures, what he or she can and can’t photograph, and whether and how an image can be altered in the darkroom or on the computer.
    [Show full text]
  • Photo Journalism
    Photojournalism Telling the story pho·to·jour·nal·ism Photojournalism is a branch of journalism focused on using images to tell a story. the art or practice of communicating news by photographs, especially in magazines. What is a photojournalist? A journalist tells stories. A photographer takes pictures of nouns (people, places and things). A photojournalist takes the best of both and locks it into the most powerful medium available - frozen images. What does it take to be a great journalist? A great journalist cares about people and an ideal world. A great journalist can approach a topic as vast as the universe and make it simple and interesting to both Einstein and the new immigrant, who is trying to learn the language. Photography vs photojournalism what's the difference between photography and photojournalism? Photography vs photojournalism what's the difference between photography and photojournalism? VERBS What makes a photojournalist different from a photographer? Photographers take pictures of nouns (people, places and things). Photojournalists shoot action verbs ("kicks," "explodes," "cries," etc.). Photojournalists do shoot some nouns. These nouns can be standard photos of people (portraits), places (proposed zoning areas or construction sites) and things (name it). However, the nouns we seek still must tell a story. To tell a story you need… a sentence which needs a subject, a verb a direct object. News photos need the same construction. Photojournalists tell stories with their images. Also, words are always used in conjunction with photojournalist's images. Here’s an Example :0) Rose is painting the kitchen walls. The subject here is Rose, and what is Rose doing? Rose is painting.
    [Show full text]
  • The Standard of Care in Malpractice Cases Irvin Sherman
    Osgoode Hall Law Journal Article 4 Volume 4, Number 2 (September 1966) The tS andard of Care in Malpractice Cases Irvin Sherman Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj Article Citation Information Sherman, Irvin. "The tS andard of Care in Malpractice Cases." Osgoode Hall Law Journal 4.2 (1966) : 222-242. http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol4/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Osgoode Hall Law Journal by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. THE STANDARD OF CARE IN MALPRACTICE CASES IRVIN SHERMAN Medical malpractice has been a controversial issue both in the press and in medical and legal circles in recent years. As a result, the public in general and the medical profession in particular have become increasingly aware of the professional conduct of doctors. In Califor- nia, "malpractice actions have become so prevalent that on the average one out of every four doctors is sued at some time for malpractice".1 The situation is not quite as serious in Canada. In 1965, the Canadian Medical Protective Association which represents 78% (15,500 out of 22,000) of Canadian doctors handled just 27 cases in- volving malpractice.2 It has been stated that, "the practising physician or surgeon is an easy target for the blackmailer. The disgruntled or unscrupulous patient can inevitably destroy the reputation of the most eminent physician or surgeon by an ill-founded action for malpractice." 3 The adverse publicity atributable to a medical negligence case, regardless how unfounded the action may be, can only have a detrimental effect upon the doctor's career, thus weakening the vital role he can play in contributing to the needs of society.
    [Show full text]
  • FTCA Handbook Is a Revision of the Material Originally Published in July 1979 and Updated Periodically Since
    JACS-Z 1 November 1999 MEMORANDUM FOR CLAIMS JUDGE ADVOCATES/CLAIMS ATTORNEYS SUBJECT: Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) Handbook 1. This edition of the FTCA Handbook is a revision of the material originally published in July 1979 and updated periodically since. The previous edition was last updated in September 1998. This edition contains significant cases through September 1999 pertaining to the filing and processing of administrative claims under the FTCA (Title 28, United States Code, Sections 2671-2680) and related claims statutes. 2. This Handbook provides case citations covering a myriad of issues. The citations are organized in a topical manner, paralleling the steps an attorney should take in analyzing a claim. Older citations have not been removed. Shepardizing is essential. 3. If any errors are noted, including the omission of relevant cases, please use the error sheet at the end of the Handbook to bring this to our attention. Users needing further information or clarification of this material should contact their Area Action Officer or Mr. Joseph H. Rouse, Deputy Chief, Tort Claims Division, DSN: 923-7009, extension 212; or commercial: (301) 677-7009, extension 212. JOHN H. NOLAN III Colonel, JA Commanding TABLE OF CONTENTS I. REQUIREMENTS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE FILING A. Why is There a Requirement? 1. Effective Date of Requirement............................ 1 2. Administrative Filing Requirement Jurisdictional......... 1 3. Waiver of Administrative Filing Requirement.............. 1 4. Purposes of Requirement.................................. 2 5. Administrative Filing Location........................... 2 6. Not Necessary for Compulsory Counterclaim................ 2 7. Not Necessary for Third Party Practice................... 2 B. What Must be Filed? 1. Written Demand for Sum Certain..........................
    [Show full text]
  • The United States Supreme Court Adopts a Reasonable Juvenile Standard in J.D.B. V. North Carolina
    THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT ADOPTS A REASONABLE JUVENILE STANDARD IN J.D.B. V NORTH CAROLINA FOR PURPOSES OF THE MIRANDA CUSTODY ANALYSIS: CAN A MORE REASONED JUSTICE SYSTEM FOR JUVENILES BE FAR BEHIND? Marsha L. Levick and Elizabeth-Ann Tierney∗ I. Introduction II. The Reasonable Person Standard a. Background b. The Reasonable Person Standard and Children: Kids Are Different III. Roper v. Simmons and Graham v. Florida: Embedding Developmental Research Into the Court’s Constitutional Analysis IV. From Miranda v. Arizona to J.D.B. v. North Carolina V. J.D.B. v. North Carolina: The Facts and The Analysis VI. Reasonableness Applied: Justifications, Defenses, and Excuses a. Duress Defenses b. Justified Use of Force c. Provocation d. Negligent Homicide e. Felony Murder VII. Conclusion I. Introduction The “reasonable person” in American law is as familiar to us as an old shoe. We slip it on without thinking; we know its shape, style, color, and size without looking. Beginning with our first-year law school classes in torts and criminal law, we understand that the reasonable person provides a measure of liability and responsibility in our legal system.1 She informs our * ∗Marsha L. Levick is the Deputy Director and Chief Counsel for Juvenile Law Center, a national public interest law firm for children, based in Philadelphia, Pa., which Ms. Levick co-founded in 1975. Ms. Levick is a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania and Temple University School of Law. Elizabeth-Ann “LT” Tierney is the 2011 Sol and Helen Zubrow Fellow in Children's Law at the Juvenile Law Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Veteran Journalist Ricardo Baca Joins Marijuana Industry Publication Mg Magazine As National Cannabis Columnist ​ ​
    Veteran Journalist Ricardo Baca Joins Marijuana Industry Publication mg Magazine as National Cannabis Columnist ​ ​ A 20-Year Media Veteran and Subject of Rolling Papers, Baca Asks mg Readers ​ ​ ​ ​ What They Want to See in the Recurring Monthly Print and Online Column DENVER, Colorado—May 30, 2018—Ricardo Baca, veteran journalist and founder of ​ award-winning news site The Cannabist, is joining national cannabis magazine mg as its ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ brand-new National Cannabis Columnist, mg owner CANN Media Group and Grasslands: A ​ ​ ​ ​ Journalism-Minded Agency announced today. "We're extremely pleased to have the opportunity to debut Ricardo's column in mg magazine,” ​ ​ said editor-in-chief Tom Hymes. “As prognostications about the industry come face-to-face with ​ ​ reality over the coming months and years, we'll need thoughtful voices to help guide the journey. Ricardo will surely provide one such voice, and we hope our readers appreciate engaging with him as much as we do." A 20-year veteran of daily newspapers including The Denver ​ Post, Mr. Baca approached his ​ new editors about crowdsourcing the new column’s topical approach and subject matter—so instead of making that decision in an editorial vacuum, Mr. Baca and the mg team are asking the ​ ​ magazine’s readers what kind of content they’d like to read from the publication’s newest columnist. Mr. Baca is prepared to delve into the trickiest cannabis conundrums of the modern world in the new column—from the industry’s looming commercialization to columns that would break down the many different cannabis markets across the country from Nevada to Colorado to D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Journalist
    October 2004 The Journalist Issue 2 Journalism Department Newsletter for Majors Mike Cowling, the newest inductee in the Journalism Alumni Hall of Fame By Cassie Fifer Devoting his life to journalism is something that Mike Cowling has never thought twice about; therefore, no one was surprised when Cowling was inducted into the Journalism Alumni Hall of Fame. According to John Ryan, chair of the selection committee, “He was very good, very conscientious and was very dedicated….” Ryan got to see first hand how devoted Cowling was to journalism because he went to school with him. Cowling broke into the newspaper business when he was in high school. He worked for his hometown newspaper in Mt. Carmel. “I wrote sports, covering Dr. Les Hyder welcomes Mike Cowling to the Journliasm Alumni Hall of Fame on Wednesday little league games and realized back then Oct. 13. Cowling spoke to a group of alumni, students and faculty about his career in the that I had a knack for it,” he said. journalism field at the induction in Buzzard Auditorium. Photo by Doug Lawhead “I was a journalism minor because they didn’t actually make this a major until I confidence in me and helped me get into Lori Miller Drummond, who was was a junior or senior. I had enough credit this program with financial assistance,” also an announced honoree, will be from both that I decided I would double Cowling said. Since that day many years inducted into the Alumni Hall of Fame major in history and journalism, ” he said. ago, he has believed that it was people like when attending the Student At Eastern, he was editor of The Daily Thornburgh and this university that made Publication Banquet in the spring.
    [Show full text]
  • Case: 1:13-Cv-00098-LW Doc #: 33 Filed: 06/04/14 1 of 26. Pageid
    Case: 1:13-cv-00098-LW Doc #: 33 Filed: 06/04/14 1 of 26. PageID #: <pageID> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION PSYCHIATRIC SOLUTIONS, et al., ) Case No. 1:13CV0098 ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) JUDGE LESLEY WELLS ) (Magistrate Judge Kenneth S. McHargh) WALLER LANSDEN DORTCH & ) DAVIS, LLP, et al., ) ) Defendants ) ) ) ) REPORT AND ) RECOMMENDATION McHARGH, Mag. J. The plaintiff Windsor- Laurelwood Center for Behavioral Medicine (“Laurelwood”) filed suit against defendants Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis, LLP, attorney Mark Peters, and attorney W. Judd Peak. The amended complaint (“amended complaint,” or simply, “complaint”) contains three counts: (1) legal malpractice, against defendants Peters and Peak; (2) fraud, against defendants Peters and Peak; and (3) vicarious liability/ respondeat superior, against defendant Waller. The amended complaint seeks compensatory and punitive damages. (Doc. 2 5 , Am. Compl.) The defendants had represented Laurelwood in a prior employment discrimination action brought against Laurelwood. Laurelwood’s allegations stem from the defendants’ handling of discovery documents and certain representations made to Laurelwood during the course of their attorney-client relationship. Case: 1:13-cv-00098-LW Doc #: 33 Filed: 06/04/14 2 of 26. PageID #: <pageID> The defendants have filed a motion to dismiss the fraud count, and the request for punitive damages. (Doc. 27, and exhibits, doc. 28.) The plaintiffs have filed a memorandum in opposition. (Doc. 29.) The defendants have filed a reply (doc. 30), with supplemental authority (doc. 31). The plaintiffs have weighed in on the supplemental authority. (Doc. 32.) I. MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Until fairly recently, the standard for a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted was that the motion establish, beyond a reasonable doubt, that “the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.” Conley v.
    [Show full text]
  • Fraud: District of Columbia by Robert Van Kirk, Williams & Connolly LLP, with Practical Law Commercial Litigation
    STATE Q&A Fraud: District of Columbia by Robert Van Kirk, Williams & Connolly LLP, with Practical Law Commercial Litigation Status: Law stated as of 16 Mar 2021 | Jurisdiction: District of Columbia, United States This document is published by Practical Law and can be found at: us.practicallaw.tr.com/w-029-0846 Request a free trial and demonstration at: us.practicallaw.tr.com/about/freetrial A Q&A guide to fraud claims under District of Columbia law. This Q&A addresses the elements of actual fraud, including material misrepresentation and reliance, and other types of fraud claims, such as fraudulent concealment and constructive fraud. Elements Generally – nondisclosure of a material fact when there is a duty to disclose (Jericho Baptist Church Ministries, Inc. (D.C.) v. Jericho Baptist Church Ministries, Inc. (Md.), 1. What are the elements of a fraud claim in 223 F. Supp. 3d 1, 10 (D.D.C. 2016) (applying District your jurisdiction? of Columbia law)). To state a claim of common law fraud (or fraud in the (Sundberg v. TTR Realty, LLC, 109 A.3d 1123, 1131 inducement) under District of Columbia law, a plaintiff (D.C. 2015).) must plead that: • A material misrepresentation actionable in fraud • The defendant made: must be consciously false and intended to mislead another (Sarete, Inc. v. 1344 U St. Ltd. P’ship, 871 A.2d – a false statement of material fact (see Material 480, 493 (D.C. 2005)). A literally true statement Misrepresentation); that creates a false impression can be actionable in fraud (Jacobson v. Hofgard, 168 F. Supp. 3d 187, 196 – with knowledge of its falsity; and (D.D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of False Information on Journalism
    BRIEF 2 The Effects of False Information on Journalism KEY FINDINGS This brief explores how false information* has influenced the profession of journalism, journalists themselves, and the production of news. Evidence The focus on “fake news” and • draws from an original survey of 1,018 journalists, 22 semi-structured disinformation in the media has interviews, and secondary sources. See the Executive Summary for decreased trust in journalism for more information about the methodology. The effects outlined in this a subset of Americans; however, brief primarily stem from two sources: (1) journalists’ knowledge of in contrast, part of the public increasing misinformation and disinformation shaping their behavior, and has simultaneously increased (2) the public’s varied interpretations of “fake news” in the current news their demand for and respect of environment. “Fake news” had a range of meanings to respondents, but was journalism, resulting in increased broadly considered to reflect a general attack on the media—specifically hiring at large outlets. allegations that the field of journalism is rife with fabricated information due to misinformation, disinformation, and the journalists themselves. Balancing Several survey respondents link • the public’s understanding of “fake news” and maintaining trust in a time the current news environment to when accusations of “fake news” are commonplace, has impacted the increased harassment: 27% of ways in which journalists conduct themselves. surveyed respondents said they have been harassed and 43% said they have colleagues who have been harassed. Minorities and women are disproportionately the targets of harassment. • Heightened publicity about false information has led some journalists to increase the time and resources they spend on sourcing.
    [Show full text]