Ethnobotany of Chepang Community from Mid- Hills of Nepal Arun Rijal
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Grass Genera in Townsville
Grass Genera in Townsville Nanette B. Hooker Photographs by Chris Gardiner SCHOOL OF MARINE and TROPICAL BIOLOGY JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY TOWNSVILLE QUEENSLAND James Cook University 2012 GRASSES OF THE TOWNSVILLE AREA Welcome to the grasses of the Townsville area. The genera covered in this treatment are those found in the lowland areas around Townsville as far north as Bluewater, south to Alligator Creek and west to the base of Hervey’s Range. Most of these genera will also be found in neighbouring areas although some genera not included may occur in specific habitats. The aim of this book is to provide a description of the grass genera as well as a list of species. The grasses belong to a very widespread and large family called the Poaceae. The original family name Gramineae is used in some publications, in Australia the preferred family name is Poaceae. It is one of the largest flowering plant families of the world, comprising more than 700 genera, and more than 10,000 species. In Australia there are over 1300 species including non-native grasses. In the Townsville area there are more than 220 grass species. The grasses have highly modified flowers arranged in a variety of ways. Because they are highly modified and specialized, there are also many new terms used to describe the various features. Hence there is a lot of terminology that chiefly applies to grasses, but some terms are used also in the sedge family. The basic unit of the grass inflorescence (The flowering part) is the spikelet. The spikelet consists of 1-2 basal glumes (bracts at the base) that subtend 1-many florets or flowers. -
Ornamental Grasses for the Midsouth Landscape
Ornamental Grasses for the Midsouth Landscape Ornamental grasses with their variety of form, may seem similar, grasses vary greatly, ranging from cool color, texture, and size add diversity and dimension to season to warm season grasses, from woody to herbaceous, a landscape. Not many other groups of plants can boast and from annuals to long-lived perennials. attractiveness during practically all seasons. The only time This variation has resulted in five recognized they could be considered not to contribute to the beauty of subfamilies within Poaceae. They are Arundinoideae, the landscape is the few weeks in the early spring between a unique mix of woody and herbaceous grass species; cutting back the old growth of the warm-season grasses Bambusoideae, the bamboos; Chloridoideae, warm- until the sprouting of new growth. From their emergence season herbaceous grasses; Panicoideae, also warm-season in the spring through winter, warm-season ornamental herbaceous grasses; and Pooideae, a cool-season subfamily. grasses add drama, grace, and motion to the landscape Their habitats also vary. Grasses are found across the unlike any other plants. globe, including in Antarctica. They have a strong presence One of the unique and desirable contributions in prairies, like those in the Great Plains, and savannas, like ornamental grasses make to the landscape is their sound. those in southern Africa. It is important to recognize these Anyone who has ever been in a pine forest on a windy day natural characteristics when using grasses for ornament, is aware of the ethereal music of wind against pine foliage. since they determine adaptability and management within The effect varies with the strength of the wind and the a landscape or region, as well as invasive potential. -
GRAPHIE by Cornelia D. Niles with INTRODUCTION and BOTANICAL
A BIBLIOGRAPHIC STUDY OF BEAUVOIS' AGROSTO- • GRAPHIE By Cornelia D. Niles WITH INTRODUCTION AND BOTANICAL NOTES By Aones Chase nrntODTJCTiON The Essai d?une Nouvelle Agrostographie ; ou Nouveaux Genres des Graminees; avec figures representant les Oaracteres de tous les Genres, by A. M. F. J. Palisot de Beauvois, published in 1812, is, from the standpoint of the nomenclature of grasses, a very important work, its importance being due principally to its innumerable errors, less so because of its scientific value. In this small volume 69 new genera are proposed and some 640 new species, new binomials, and new names are published. Of the 69 genera proposed 31 are to-day recognized as valid, and of the 640 names about 61 are commonly accepted. There is probably not a grass flora of any considerable region anywhere in the world that does not contain some of Beauvois' names. Many of the new names are made in such haphazard fashion that they are incorrectly listed in the Index Kewensis. There are, besides, a number of misspelled names that have found their way into botanical literature. The inaccuracies are so numerous and the cita- tions so incomplete that only a trained bibliographer* could solve the many puzzles presented. Cornelia D. Niles in connection with her work on the bibliography of grasses, maintained in the form of a card catalogue in the Grass Herbarium, worked out the basis in literature of each of these new names. The botanical problems involved, the interpretation of descriptions and figures, were worked out by Agnes Chase, who is also respon- sible for the translation and summaries from the Advertisement, Introduction, and Principles. -
A Biosystematic Study of the Genus Imperata (Gramineae: Andropogoneae) Mark Lauren Gabel Iowa State University
Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1982 A biosystematic study of the genus Imperata (Gramineae: Andropogoneae) Mark Lauren Gabel Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Gabel, Mark Lauren, "A biosystematic study of the genus Imperata (Gramineae: Andropogoneae) " (1982). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 7499. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/7499 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting througli an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark, it is an indication of either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, duplicate copy, or copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed. -
Taxonomic Revision of <I>Microstegium</I> S.Str
Blumea 57, 2012: 160–189 www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/blumea RESEARCH ARTICLE http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/000651912X658908 Taxonomic revision of Microstegium s.str. (Andropogoneae, Poaceae) C.-H. Chen1, 3, J.-F. Veldkamp2, C.-S. Kuoh3 Key words Abstract Microstegium excl. Leptatherum (Andropogoneae, Poaceae) is revised. There are at least 16 species and one variety. By lack of type materials eight names could not be placed, while, moreover, another three were Andropogoneae invalidly published. An identification key is provided, synonymy, descriptions, and notes are given. A new combina- Leptatherum tion is proposed. Microstegium Poaceae Published on 29 October 2012 taxonomic revision INTRODUCTION (1966) considered it to be a distinct section of Microstegium, based on the slender and hairless racemes, abruptly acute Microstegium Nees (Poaceae, Andropogoneae) occurs in glume apex and concave dorsal face of the lower glumes. He tropical and subtropical Africa, Asia, Australia, and some Pacific included M. nudum (= L. nudum) and M. nudum (Trin.) A.Camus islands (Clayton & Renvoize 1986, Koyama 1987, Watson & subsp. japonicum (Miq.) Tzvelev (= Leptatherum boreale (Ohwi) Dallwitz 1992, Hsu 2000). They are creeping or rambling annu- C.Hui Chen, Kuoh & Veldk.) in it. In these taxa there are two als or perennials with broadly linear to lanceolate leaf-blades, stamens per floret, while there are usually three in the other inflorescences of 1–many subdigitate racemes; internodes species of Microstegium, with the only exception of M. tenue filiform to clavate or inflated; sessile spikelet: lower glume (Trin.) Hosok. with only 1. dorsally with a deep longitudinal grove or a broadly concave These observations were more recently supported by stud- channel, the margins sharply inflexed and usually keeled; up- ies of the phylogeny of chloroplast gene ndhF sequences in per glume often shortly awned; lower floret well-developed, Andropogoneae (Spangler et al. -
National Wetland Plant List: 2016 Wetland Ratings
Lichvar, R.W., D.L. Banks, W.N. Kirchner, and N.C. Melvin. 2016. The National Wetland Plant List: 2016 wetland ratings. Phytoneuron 2016-30: 1–17. Published 28 April 2016. ISSN 2153 733X THE NATIONAL WETLAND PLANT LIST: 2016 WETLAND RATINGS ROBERT W. LICHVAR U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory 72 Lyme Road Hanover, New Hampshire 03755-1290 DARIN L. BANKS U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 7 Watershed Support, Wetland and Stream Protection Section 11201 Renner Boulevard Lenexa, Kansas 66219 WILLIAM N. KIRCHNER U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 1 911 NE 11 th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97232 NORMAN C. MELVIN USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Central National Technology Support Center 501 W. Felix Street, Bldg. 23 Fort Worth, Texas 76115-3404 ABSTRACT The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) administers the National Wetland Plant List (NWPL) for the United States (U.S.) and its territories. Responsibility for the NWPL was transferred to the Corps from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) in 2006. From 2006 to 2012 the Corps led an interagency effort to update the list in conjunction with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the FWS, and the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), culminating in the publication of the 2012 NWPL. In 2013 and 2014 geographic ranges and nomenclature were updated. This paper presents the fourth update of the list under Corps administration. During the current update, the indicator status of 1689 species was reviewed. A total of 306 ratings of 186 species were changed during the update. -
Genetic Diversity of Pogonatherum Paniceum (Lam.) Hack
African Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 8 (7), pp. 1226-1232, 6 April, 2009 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJB ISSN 1684–5315 © 2009 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper Genetic diversity of Pogonatherum paniceum (Lam.) Hack. in Southwest China revealed by AFLP markers Guo-Qing Zhuang1, Dan-Wei Ma1, 2, Wen-Guo Wang1, Sheng-Hua Wang1 and Fang Chen1* 1Department of Key Lab of Bio-resources and Eco-environment, Ministry of Education, Collage of Life Science , Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China. 2Collage of Life Science, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610066, China. Accepted 9 March, 2009 Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers were used to estimate the genetic diversity of Pogonatherum paniceum (Lam.) Hack. from Sichuan Province, Yunnan Province, Chongqing City and Guangxi Zhuang autonomous Region in China. 10 primer combinations were carried out on 180 different individuals sampled from 22 wild populations. Out of the 485 discernable DNA fragments generated, 441 were polymorphic. The percentage of polymorphic bands (PPB) was 90.93% at the species level. Observed number of alleles was 1.9093 ± 0.2875 and effective number of alleles was 1.4048 ± 0.3342. Nei's gene diversity and Shannon's Information index were 0.2494 ± 0.1657 and 0.3903 ± 0.2186, respectively. Nei’s genetic distance among 22 populations ranged from 0.0996 to 0.6952. Genetic identity among populations ranged from 0.4990 to 0.9052, averaging 0.7387. Unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) cluster analysis based on Nei’s genetic distance indicated that most populations were positioned into the relevant area. -
Phylogenetics of Miscanthus, Saccharum and Related Genera
J Plant Res (2002) 115:381–392 © The Botanical Society of Japan and Springer-Verlag Tokyo 2002 Digital Object Identifier (DOI) 10.1007/s10265-002-0049-3 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Trevor R. Hodkinson • Mark W. Chase • M. Dolores Lledó • Nicolas Salamin • Stephen A. Renvoize Phylogenetics of Miscanthus, Saccharum and related genera (Saccharinae, Andropogoneae, Poaceae) based on DNA sequences from ITS nuclear ribosomal DNA and plastid trnL intron and trnL-F intergenic spacers Received: February 4, 2002 / Accepted: June 19, 2002 / Published online: August 28, 2002 Abstract DNA sequences were used to assess the mono- phyly and inter-relationships of Miscanthus, Saccharum Introduction and related genera in the Saccharum complex. Three DNA regions were sequenced, including the trnL intron and the Tribe Andropogoneae (Poaceae) includes many species trnL-F intergenic spacer of the plastid genome and the ITS with high economic value, including the C4 grasses Saccha- region of nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA). Because it was rum officinarum L. (sugarcane), Sorghum bicolor (L.) more variable, the ITS region proved most suitable for phy- Moench (sorghum) and Zea mays L. (maize). Subtribe Sac- logenetic reconstruction at this level, and the results indi- charinae Griseb. includes Saccharum L. and Miscanthus cate that Miscanthus s.l. and Saccharum s.l. are polyphyletic. Anderss., the latter having considerable potential as a bio- A set of species from Saccharum section Ripidium (clade a) mass crop for renewable energy production and raw mate- do not group closely with any members of Saccharum s.l.. A rial for the cellulose and paper industries (Bullard et al. number of Miscanthus species from eastern or south- 1995; Clifton-Brown and Lewandowski 2000). -
2020.07.29.226753V1.Full.Pdf
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.29.226753; this version posted July 30, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. On the Validity of the Saccharum Complex and the Saccharinae Subtribe: A Re-assesment Dyfed Lloyd Evans1,2 Shailesh Vinay Joshi1 1South African Sugarcane Research Institute, Mount Edgecombe, Durban, South Africa 2Cambridge Sequence Services, Waterbeach, Cambridge, UK July 28, 2020 Abstract The ‘Saccharum Complex’ represents an hypothetical collective of species that were supposedly responsible, through interbreeding, for the origins of sugarcane. Though recent phylogenetic studies have cast doubt on the veracity of this hypothesis, it has cast a long shadow over the taxonomics of the Andropogoneae and the Saccharinae subtribe. Though evidence suggests that Saccharum s.s. is comprised of only three true species, ac- cording to Kew’s GrassBase there are as many as 34 species in Saccharum s.l. Our recent work has shown that many of these species are millions of years divergent from Saccharum. As the Saccharum complex represents the species that sugarcane breeders attempt to introgress into sugarcane, and as the Saccharinae, in its current form, covers almst 12 million years of Andropogoneae evolution an update on the extents of the Taxonomic and customary groupings is much needed. Based on the latest sequence based phylogenies and the inclusion of traditional taxonomics we develop an integrated view of the Saccharinae + Saccharum complex species in the context of the major groupings within the Andropogoneae. -
Treatment of Cadmium, Lead and Copper Using Phytoremediation Enhanced by Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles
ECO-CHRONICLE 25 ECO CHRONICLE ISSN: 0973-4155 Vol. 12, No. 2, June, 2017 PP: 25 - 34 TREATMENT OF CADMIUM, LEAD AND COPPER USING PHYTOREMEDIATION ENHANCED BY TITANIUM DIOXIDE NANOPARTICLES. Harikumar, P.S. and Megha, T. Water Quality Division, Centre for Water Resources Development and Management, Kozhikode, Kerala, India. Corresponding author: [email protected]; [email protected] ABSTRACT Presently, phytoremediation is a beneficial and affordable technique used to extract or remove inactive metals and metal pollutants from contaminated water. Remediation of heavy metal from water and soil is extreme necessary. Phytoremediation ability of two aquatic plants Eichhornia crassipes and Salvinia molesta for the removal of toxic heavy metals like Pb, Cd and Cu were attempted in the present study under three different conditions. Maximum removal of Pb, Cd and Cu was observed in TiO2 nanoparticles applied plants used phytoremediation system (C). Results obtained from heavy metal accumulation in plants parts, bioconcentration factor, translocation factor indicates that phytoremediation systems enhanced by TiO2 nanoparticles showed more tendency to translocate metals to its areal parts. The results showed that, plants applied with TiO2 nanoparticles exhibited significant increase in physiological response like relative growth and the production of chlorophyll content compared to others. Compared to control (A) and the phytoremediation system in which TiO2 nanoparticles entrapped calcium alginate beads were applied to plants (B), fast and efficient removal of lead, cadmium and copper was observed in phytoremediation system enhanced by TiO2 nanoparticles i.e., in C. Phytoremediation technique enhanced by TiO2 nanoparticles seems to be promising in the treatment of heavy metals from water. -
Whole Chloroplast Genome and Gene Locus Phylogenies Reveal The
Lloyd Evans et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology (2019) 19:33 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-019-1356-9 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Whole chloroplast genome and gene locus phylogenies reveal the taxonomic placement and relationship of Tripidium (Panicoideae: Andropogoneae) to sugarcane Dyfed Lloyd Evans1,2,3* , Shailesh V. Joshi1,2 and Jianping Wang4,5,6 Abstract Background: For over 50 years, attempts have been made to introgress agronomically useful traits from Erianthus sect. Ripidium (Tripidium) species into sugarcane based on both genera being part of the ‘Saccharum Complex’,an interbreeding group of species believed to be involved in the origins of sugarcane. However, recent low copy number gene studies indicate that Tripidium and Saccharum are more divergent than previously thought. The extent of genus Tripidium has not been fully explored and many species that should be included in Tripidium are still classified as Saccharum. Moreover, Tripidium is currently defined as incertae sedis within the Andropogoneae, though it has been suggested that members of this genus are related to the Germainiinae. Results: Eight newly-sequenced chloroplasts from potential Tripidium species were combined in a phylogenetic study with 46 members of the Panicoideae, including seven Saccharum accessions, two Miscanthidium and three Miscanthus species. A robust chloroplast phylogeny was generated and comparison with a gene locus phylogeny clearly places a monophyletic Tripidium clade outside the bounds of the Saccharinae. A key to the currently identified Tripidium species is presented. Conclusion: For the first time, we have undertaken a large-scale whole plastid study of eight newly assembled Tripidium accessions and a gene locus study of five Tripidium accessions. -
Taxonomic Revision of Microstegium S.Str. (Andropogoneae, Poaceae)
Blumea 57, 2012: 160–189 www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/blumea RESEARCH ARTICLE http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/000651912X658908 Taxonomic revision of Microstegium s.str. (Andropogoneae, Poaceae) C.-H. Chen1, 3, J.-F. Veldkamp2, C.-S. Kuoh3 Key words Abstract Microstegium excl. Leptatherum (Andropogoneae, Poaceae) is revised. There are at least 16 species and one variety. By lack of type materials eight names could not be placed, while, moreover, another three were Andropogoneae invalidly published. An identification key is provided, synonymy, descriptions, and notes are given. A new combina- Leptatherum tion is proposed. Microstegium Poaceae Published on 29 October 2012 taxonomic revision INTRODUCTION (1966) considered it to be a distinct section of Microstegium, based on the slender and hairless racemes, abruptly acute Microstegium Nees (Poaceae, Andropogoneae) occurs in glume apex and concave dorsal face of the lower glumes. He tropical and subtropical Africa, Asia, Australia, and some Pacific included M. nudum (= L. nudum) and M. nudum (Trin.) A.Camus islands (Clayton & Renvoize 1986, Koyama 1987, Watson & subsp. japonicum (Miq.) Tzvelev (= Leptatherum boreale (Ohwi) Dallwitz 1992, Hsu 2000). They are creeping or rambling annu- C.Hui Chen, Kuoh & Veldk.) in it. In these taxa there are two als or perennials with broadly linear to lanceolate leaf-blades, stamens per floret, while there are usually three in the other inflorescences of 1–many subdigitate racemes; internodes species of Microstegium, with the only exception of M. tenue filiform to clavate or inflated; sessile spikelet: lower glume (Trin.) Hosok. with only 1. dorsally with a deep longitudinal grove or a broadly concave These observations were more recently supported by stud- channel, the margins sharply inflexed and usually keeled; up- ies of the phylogeny of chloroplast gene ndhF sequences in per glume often shortly awned; lower floret well-developed, Andropogoneae (Spangler et al.