DOCSLIB.ORG

Turkel Udel 0060D 14

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Turkel Udel 0060D 14 THE DIFFUSION OF CIVIC TECHNOLOGY: HOW TECHNOLOGY AND DEVOLUTION ARE RESHAPING CIVIC LIFE IN URBAN AMERICA by Eli Turkel A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Urban Affairs and Public Policy. Spring, 2020 © 2020, Turkel All Rights Reserved THE DIFFUSION OF CIVIC TECHNOLOGY: HOW TECHNOLOGY AND DEVOLUTION ARE RESHAPING CIVIC LIFE IN URBAN AMERICA by Eli Turkel Approved: __________________________________________________________ Maria P. Aristigueta, D.P.A. Director of the Joseph R. Biden, Jr. School of Public Policy and Administration Approved: __________________________________________________________ John A. Pelesko, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences Approved: __________________________________________________________ Douglas J. Doren, Ph.D. Interim Vice Provost for Graduate and Professional Education and Dean of the Graduate College I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: __________________________________________________________ John McNutt, Ph.D. Professor in charge of dissertation I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: __________________________________________________________ Jonathan Justice, Ph.D. Member of dissertation committee I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: __________________________________________________________ Tibor Toth, Ph.D. Member of dissertation committee I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: __________________________________________________________ John Stephens, Ph.D. Member of dissertation committee ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the faculty and staff of the Biden School for all of their guidance and support over the last four years. Additionally, I want to thank my dissertation committee for all of their guidance and support, including Dr. Johnathan Justice, Dr. John Stephens, and Dr.Tibor Toth. I met Dr. Stephens at the Code for America Brigade Congress in the fall of 2017. I look forward to seeing Dr. Stephens at future Code for America events. To my chair, Dr. John McNutt, thank you for all of the lunches and talks we had throughout this process. You taught me a tremendous amount about the research process. I also want to thank the Code for America and Open Data Delaware communities. I am grateful to be a part of this movement and to work with all of you. Finally, I would like to thank my family for all of their support during this process and throughout my life. Earning a Ph.D. is something I have aspired to for a long time. The love and guidance of my family allowed me to reach this goal. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................... viii LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................... ix ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... x Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 1 1.1 Research Questions ................................................................................... 3 2 LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................................... 5 2.1 Civic Technology As Civic Participation .................................................. 5 2.1.1 Definitions of Participation ........................................................... 7 2.1.2 Wither Participation? .................................................................... 9 2.2 Historical Antecedents of Civic Technology .......................................... 10 2.2.1 Community Networks................................................................... 11 2.2.2 Community Technology ............................................................... 13 2.3 Components of Civic Technology ........................................................... 15 2.3.1 Open Civic Data .......................................................................... 17 2.3.2 Technology .................................................................................. 18 2.3.3 Collaborative Processes .............................................................. 19 2.3.3.1 Civic Hacking and Hackathons .................................... 20 2.3.3.2 Code For America ........................................................ 23 2.3.3.3 Code For America Brigades ......................................... 26 2.4 Civic Technology As a Social Movement ............................................... 28 2.5 Related Social Movements ...................................................................... 33 2.5.1 Open Government ........................................................................ 34 2.5.2 Tech4Good .................................................................................. 38 v 2.5.3 Data4Good .................................................................................. 39 2.5.4 Evidence Based Practice ............................................................. 39 2.5.5 Online Protest Movemments........................................................ 40 2.5.6 Participatory budgeting............................................................... 41 2.6 Conclusion ............................................................................................... 42 2.7 The Consequences Of Diffusion ............................................................. 42 2.7.1 The Diffusion Context .................................................................. 44 3 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK.................................................................... 47 3.1 Propositions ............................................................................................. 50 3.1.1 Traditional Social Capital ........................................................... 51 3.1.2 Creative Class ............................................................................. 52 3.2 Central Hypotheses .................................................................................. 52 3.3 Covariants ................................................................................................ 54 3.3.1 Distress Score .............................................................................. 54 3.3.2 Networked Social Capital ............................................................ 55 3.3.3 Broadband ................................................................................... 55 3.3.4 Population ................................................................................... 56 3.3.5 Education ..................................................................................... 56 4 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................... 59 4.1 Subjects.................................................................................................... 59 4.2 Design Structure ...................................................................................... 62 4.2.1 Variables and Data Sources ........................................................ 62 4.2.2 Dependent Variable Code For America Brigades ...................... 62 4.2.3 Independent Variables ................................................................. 64 4.2.4 Traditional Social Capital ........................................................... 64 4.2.5 Creative Class ............................................................................. 67 4.2.6 Covariates.................................................................................... 69 4.2.6.1 Education ...................................................................... 69 4.2.6.2 Population ..................................................................... 69 4.2.6.3 Distressed Community Index ....................................... 70 4.2.6.4 Networked Social Capital Organizations ..................... 70 4.2.6.5 Broadband..................................................................... 72 vi 4.3 Data Analysis........................................................................................... 72 4.4 Limitations ............................................................................................... 74 5 RESULTS ......................................................................................................... 76 6 DISCUSSION................................................................................................... 83 6.1 Findings ................................................................................................... 85 6.2 Conclusions ............................................................................................. 88 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How an Army of Techies Is Taking on City Hall
    How an Army of Techies Is Taking on City Hall By: Anya Kamenetz, November 29, 2010 Fast Company, December 2010/Januarry 2011 Still waiting for a full reboot in Washington, D.C., an army of citizen techies is redefining civic engagement on a hyperlocal level. Ben Berkowitz had a problem. His block of State Street, an expanse of charming storefronts and wood-frame houses that stretches from the border of Yale's campus into New Haven's grittier East Rock neighborhood, kept getting hit with graffiti. The 31-year- old did everything a good citizen was supposed to do: He called the city. He left multiple voice mails. He urged his neighbor to speak up. Eventually, he founded the Upper State Street Association to foster neighborhood pride. But still, the spray paint lingered. "I was feeling that helplessness when you've left three messages, you don't know what the resolution is going to be, and you don't have a way to hold anyone accountable," he says. A programmer by trade, Berkowitz sought a technological outlet for his frustrations. What if reporting graffiti or a broken traffic light or a clogged storm drain was as easy as snapping a photo with your mobile phone? What if that report was sent directly to all the groups that might give a damn, including city hall, the police department, the local utility company, and the neighborhood watch? Even better, what if all your neighbors could see those nearby reports and lend their own voices to apply pressure and get problems fixed? His solution, SeeClickFix, launched in beta in March 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing the Contribution of Digitalisation to the Smart Cities of the Future
    ENHANCING THE CONTRIBUTION OF DIGITALISATION TO THE SMART CITIES OF THE FUTURE 1 │ ENHANCING THE CONTRIBUTION OF DIGITALISATION TO THE SMART CITIES OF THE FUTURE PUBE 2 │ About the OECD The OECD is a unique forum where governments work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation. The OECD is also at the forefront of efforts to understand and to help governments respond to new developments and concerns, such as corporate governance, the information economy and the challenges of an ageing population. The Organisation provides a setting where governments can compare policy experiences, seek answers to common problems, identify good practice and work to co-ordinate domestic and international policies. About the Centre for Entrepreneurship, SMEs, Regions and Cities The Centre helps local, regional and national governments unleash the potential of entrepreneurs and small and medium-sized enterprises, promote inclusive and sustainable regions and cities, boost local job creation and implement sound tourism policies. Find out more about the OECD work on: http://www.oecd.org/regional/urban-development.htm © OECD 2019 Image credits: Getty Images / Bulat Silvia This document is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of OECD member countries. The document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. ENHANCING THE CONTRIBUTION OF DIGITALISATION TO THE SMART CITIES OF THE FUTURE This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area.
    [Show full text]
  • PHOENIX Since Our Founding in 1972, ICMA-RC’S Mission Has Been to Help Public Employees Build Retirement Security
    ICMA’s 98th Annual Conference Annual Conference 98th ICMA’s ICMA’s 98 th AnnuAl ConferenCe 40TH ANNIVERSARY 1972-2012 BUILDING RETIREMENT SECURITY PHOENIX Since our founding in 1972, ICMA-RC’s mission has been to help public employees build retirement security. We deliver on our mission Maricopa County by focusing on service, quality and value. • Phoenix/Maricopa County, Arizona Arizona County, Phoenix/Maricopa ICMA-RC is proud to be the principal sponsor of ICMA’s 98th Annual Conference and founder of the Center for State and Local Government Excellence, an organization that shares our dedication to public employees. Visit ICMA-RC’s booth (501) or website at www.icmarc.org. For additional education and research, visit the Center for State and ICMA thanks our Strategic Partner Local Government Excellence at www.slge.org. Honeywell for their co-sponsorship of the conference final program booklet. • what’s holding you back? 2012 7–10, October Cigna is proud to be the exclusive health care sponsor of ICMA’s 98th Annual Conference. Cigna.com/healthiergov BUILDING COMMUNITY We can help your city leap forward. Anxious about rising energy and operating RISING TO SEIZE THE OPPORTUNITIES costs? Concerned about the poor condition of your facilities, lighting and water utility infrastructure? We have jointly developed solutions for many cities and counties that turn expenses into improvements, create value for your citizens and staff, and help all of you achieve your vision for the future. October 7–10, 2012 Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona Health Benefits and Services Call 800-345-6770, ext. 605 or “Cigna” is a registered service mark and the “Tree of Life” logo and visit buildingsolutions.honeywell.com “GO YOU” are service marks of Cigna Intellectual Property, Inc., © 2012 Honeywell International Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • A Theoretical Model of How Digital Platforms for Public Consultation Can Leverage Deliberation to Boost Democratic Legitimacy
    Gastil, J. (2021). A Theoretical Model of How Digital Platforms for Public Consultation Can Leverage Deliberation to Boost Democratic Legitimacy. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 17(1), pp. 78-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.963 SYMPOSIUM A Theoretical Model of How Digital Platforms for Public Consultation Can Leverage Deliberation to Boost Democratic Legitimacy John Gastil The declining legitimacy of public institutions imperils modern democratic systems, yet deliberative remedies to this problem have not undergone systematic testing. The emergence of robust civic technology provides an opportunity to trace the effects of deliberation on legitimacy. Online civic platforms connecting large publics with democratic governments enable researchers to test the strength of each link that leads from public engagement to institutional legitimacy by the way of deliberation. I present such a theoretical model of these linkages and specify sets of working hypotheses regarding public participation, deliberative quality, decision quality, government responsiveness, institutional legitimacy and opportunities for empowered public engagement. Keywords: civic technology; deliberation online; digital democracy; government responsiveness; public consultation Introduction Many efforts to design online discussions have aimed, From the outset, deliberative theory has sought to explicitly or otherwise, at steering the public toward a understand and address legitimation problems in more deliberative mode of citizenship and governance democracy (Barber 1984; Cohen 1989; Habermas 1975), (Coleman & Moss 2012) as a means toward boosting and some recent reformulations of deliberative theory system legitimacy (Gastil & Richards 2017). Preliminary have aimed to make this legitimating function more assessments suggest that such efforts may prove effective explicit (Curato & Böker 2016; Richards & Gastil 2015; (Patel et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Automating Retroactive Conviction Relief in Utah Project Overview from Code for America
    Automating Retroactive Conviction Relief in Utah Project Overview from Code for America July 19, 2021 Clear My Record PASSING IMPLEMENTING INFORMING & BILLS LAWS CONNECTING PEOPLE Clean Slate Policy Courts & Repositories Millions of people paves path to clear eligible update records to reflect can get the job or housing convictions at specified relief granted they were previously time, automatically blocked from States weʼve worked with on Clean Slate Task Force Tech Assessment Impact Analysis Implementation California X X Connecticut X X Delaware X Illinois X Louisiana X X Michigan X X New Jersey X X North Carolina X x Oregon X X x Texas X X Utah X X Washington X Vermont x Technology Team in Utah ➔ Michael James Cowden: Director of Solutions Engineering Twenty five years of experience as a technologist executing successful software projects, including patented Internet messaging technology, as a founder of several early-stage startups, Fortune-500 companies and the Federal Government. Lead the development of the US SBA’s online certification program, the first successful project among a dozen attempts to move the agency off of a paper based process. ➔ Maximilian Hell, PhD: Senior Data Scientist Trained at Stanford and Oxford, his research focuses on the economic consequences of incarceration ; co-authored a study published in Science on long-term trends in income mobility in the US. Code for America’s data science team is comprised of many renowned experts in this space including academics from the University of Denver, Columbia University, and the founding member of Google’s quantitative research team. How do we confidently match individuals in a messy data set? Specific challenges 1.
    [Show full text]
  • March & April 2012 5 Short Months Till
    Page 1 GMIS International GEMGEM 5 Short Months August 19 - 22, 2012 till 2012 Conference Chicago, Illinois AnAn AssociationAssociation ofof GovernmentGovernment ITIT LeadersLeaders March & April 2012 Page 2 March & April 2012 Elected Executive Board Rick Bareuther James C. Buston Clark Rainer President 3rd Vice President International Director Richland County, S.C. City of Auburn Henry County Voice (742) 7417 144 Tichenor Ave 140 Henry Parkway [email protected] Auburn, AL 36830 McDonough, GA 30253 Voice (334)501-7200 Phone: 770 288-6841 Paul Ruth [email protected] FAX: 7709542922 1st Vice President Brian Kelley [email protected] Cobb County 4th Vice President 100 Cherokee Street, Suite 520 Portage County Marietta, GA 30090 Johnny A. Walton 449 S. Meridian St Voice (770) 528-8700 Executive Director [email protected] Ravenna, OH 44266 Aiken County Voice (330) 297-3588 828 Richland Ave. W Janet Claggett Fax: (330)298-3949 Aiken, SC 29801 Voice (803) 642-1593 2ndVice President [email protected] Richland County Fax (803) 502-1825 2020 Hampton Street [email protected] Suite 3030 Lori-Ann Fox Columbia, SC 29204 Membership Development Sherri Flynn [email protected]. City of East Providence Treasurer 145 Taunton Ave. City of Sparks East Providence, RI 02915 P.O. Box 857 Voice (401) 435-1948 Sparks, NV 89432 [email protected] Voice (775) 353-2352 [email protected] Appointed By Board Advisory Council Members Name Position Agency State Voting Member Conference Chair John Burns CIO City of Woodstock IL Sam Ferguson Gray Cassell Director of IS Town of Kernersville NC Village of Schaumburg Stephan Dawe CTO City of Opelika AL 101 Schaumburg Ct.
    [Show full text]
  • Technology Against Technocracy: Toward Design Strategies for Critical Community Technology
    Technology Against Technocracy: Toward Design Strategies for Critical Community Technology by Maya M. Wagoner B.A. American Studies University of California, Santa Cruz, 2013 Submitted to the Program in Comparative Media Studies/Writing in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Comparative Media Studies at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2017 2017 Maya M. Wagoner. Some Rights Reserved. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature redacted Signature of Author: Department of Comparative Medlei Studies/Writing May 12, 2017 Certified by: Signature redacted _ Sasha Costanza-Chock Associate Professor of Civic Media NI N I pThesis pu pervisor Accepted by: Heather Hendershot Director of Graduate Studies OFTTEHNQLQGY MAJ11 ' ITT MAY q' ?017 LIBRARtES ARWMs 2 Technology Against Technocracy: Toward Design Strategies for Critical Community Technology by Maya M. Wagoner Submitted to the Program in Comparative Media Studies/Writing in May 2017 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Comparative Media Studies/Writing Abstract This thesis develops an intersectional, critical analysis of the field of practice known as Civic Tech and highlights other relevant community-organizing and activist practices that utilize technology as a central component. First, I develop critiques of Civic Tech as a dominant technocratic, neoliberal approach to democracy and bureaucracy and trace the history and intellectual genealogy of this specific movement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Internet and Engaged Citizenship
    The Internet and Engaged Citizenship David Karpf american academy of arts & sciences The Internet and Engaged Citizenship David Karpf © 2019 by the American Academy of Arts & Sciences. All rights reserved. ISBN: 0-87724-128-7 This publication is available online at www.amacad.org /project/practice-democratic -citizenship. Suggested citation: David Karpf, The Internet and Engaged Citizenship (Cambridge, Mass.: American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2019). This paper is part of the American Academy’s Commission on the Practice of Democratic Citizenship. The statements made and views expressed in this publication are those held by the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the Officers and Members of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences. Please direct inquiries to: American Academy of Arts & Sciences 136 Irving Street Cambridge, MA 02138 Telephone: 617-576-5000 Fax: 617-576-5050 Email: [email protected] Web: www.amacad.org Contents 1 Introduction 2 Why Understanding the Digital Citizen Proves So Difficult 3 The Pace of Internet Time 7 The Proprietary Data Gap 10 The Internet and Engaged Citizenship, Circa 2019 10 The Internet and Political Polarization 14 Digital Pathways for Participation 17 The Earnest Internet Versus the Ambivalent Internet 20 The Quiet Demise of Web 2.0 23 Digital Democracy and the Field of Dreams Fallacy 26 Conclusion 26 The Upside of Internet Time 27 Bridging the Proprietary Data Gap 28 New Policy Challenges for the Platform Era 29 About the Author Introduction The Internet is everywhere. Years ago, it was limited to desktop comput- ers, synonymous with the static and whir of a connecting modem.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Annual Report Contents
    A POSITIVE VOICE FOR POLITICS 2015 ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS 5 LETTER FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 6 MISSION & VISION 7 THE PROBLEM 12 CELEBRATING 5 YEARS OF POLITICAL ACTION 14 ACTION CIVICS IN & BEYOND THE CLASSROOM 20 EDUCATING FOR DEMOCRACY: A CONVENING WITH THE FORD FOUNDATION 22 ANNUAL CIVIC TECH CHALLENGE 23 OUR IMPACT 24 FROM THE PRESS 25 FINANCIAL OVERVIEW 27 OUR SUPPORTERS 3 FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DEAR FRIENDS, Four months ago, I knew my friends This year, Generation Citizen celebrated its fifth Therefore, the definition of politics is actually, according were struggling, but I had no idea anniversary. It’s amazing to think about how far we’ve to the Merriam Webster Dictionary, “the total complex come in such a short time - from an idea, to a pilot in of relations between people living in society.” Politics their struggle had a name. I know three classrooms in Providence, RI, to working with is, literally, about people working together to get now that they’re caught in the almost 8,000 students in four sites this past school stuff done. This real definition of politics is exciting. school-to-prison pipeline. Because of year. Just as a democracy only works with full citizen It’s necessary. It is the best part of living in America participation, GC has only gone this far because of the today - not the fantastic hoopla we see on TV and talk Generation Citizen, I learned not only dedicated people who believe deeply in our mission shows. Citizens working together as citizens to the name of this issue, but also the - from our committed staff to our devoted Board of “get stuff done” - that’s essentially what Generation complex causes and major effects Directors, from our tireless volunteer Democracy Citizen is.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Design and Implementation of Civic Technologies in Resource-Limited Public Organizations
    Understanding the Design and Implementation of Civic Technologies in Resource-Limited Public Organizations by Youyang Hou A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Information) in The University of Michigan 2018 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Cliff Lampe, Chair Assistant Professor Tawanna Dillahunt. Assistant Professor Robert Goodspeed Assistant Professor Sarita Yardi Schoenebeck Youyang Hou [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6453-1260 © Youyang Hou 2018 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Writing a dissertation was the most challenging task I have ever tackled, and I am glad that I was not alone in the process. Many people have helped pave the way to the successful completion of this dissertation. I would like to take the opportunity to express my gratitude for their support, encouragement, and companionship. To begin with, I thank all of my dissertation committee members, and in particular my advisor, Dr. Cliff Lampe. It would be impossible for me to have made it this far without his support, guidance, and feedback. I am also grateful for the flexibility and accommodation he provided me in the final year of my dissertation, when there were many unexpected occurrences in my life. It made studying thousands of miles away from home a much better experience. I was fortunate to have Dr. Sarita Yardi Schoenebeck, Dr. Tawanna Dillahunt, and Dr. Robert Goodspeed as additional members on my committee. Dr. Schoenebeck and Dr. Dillahunt joined my dissertation committee when I was at the critical stage of field prelim; they have provided invaluable feedback on my analysis and writing. I also appreciate the fresh perspectives and in-depth knowledge about urban planning provided by the cognate member of my committee, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Civic Technology Design for Citizen Empowerment Erhardt
    Evaluating Civic Technology Design for Citizen Empowerment by Erhardt Graeff B.S., Rochester Institute of Technology (2006) B.S., Rochester Institute of Technology (2007) M.Phil., University of Cambridge (2008) S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2014) Submitted to the Program in Media Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Media Arts and Sciences at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2018 c Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2018. All rights reserved. Author............................................................................ Program in Media Arts and Sciences May 4, 2018 Certified by........................................................................ Ethan Zuckerman Associate Professor of the Practice Program in Media Arts and Sciences Thesis Supervisor Accepted by....................................................................... Tod Machover Academic Head Program in Media Arts and Sciences 2 Evaluating Civic Technology Design for Citizen Empowerment by Erhardt Graeff Submitted to the Program in Media Arts and Sciences on May 4, 2018, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Media Arts and Sciences Abstract Civic technology should empower us as citizens. Despite its breadth as a field, civic technology often takes its lead from Silicon Valley companies that espouse design goals potentially hazardous to participatory democracy. In this dissertation, I explore: How might we design civic technologies
    [Show full text]
  • Software Engineering in Civic Tech a Case Study About Code for Ireland
    Software Engineering in Civic Tech A Case Study about Code for Ireland Antti Knutas Victoria Palacin Giovanni Maccani Markus Helfert LUT University LUT University Maynooth University Dublin City University School of Engineering Sciences School of Engineering Sciences School of Business School of Computing Lappeenranta, Finland Lappeenranta, Finland Maynooth, Ireland Dublin, Ireland antti.knutas@lut.fi victoria.palacin@lut.fi [email protected] [email protected] Abstract—Civic grassroots have proven their ability to create useful and scalable software that addresses pressing social needs. Although software engineering plays a fundamental role in the process of creating civic technology, academic literature that analyses the software development processes of civic tech grassroots is scarce. This paper aims to advance the understanding of how civic grassroots tackle the different activities in their software development processes. In this study, we followed the formation of two projects in a civic tech group (Code for Ireland) seeking to understand how their development processes evolved over time, and how the group carried out their work in creating new technology. Our preliminary findings show that such groups are capable of setting up systematic software engineering processes that address software specification, development, validation, and evolution. While they were able to deliver software according to self-specified quality standards, the group has challenges in requirements specification, stakeholder Figure 1. Palette of Public Participation in Civic Technology adapted from [4] engagement, and reorienting from development to product delivery. Software engineering methods and tools can effectively support the future of civic technologies and potentially improve [7, 8], research in the context of software engineering practices their management, quality, and durability.
    [Show full text]