DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluating Civic Technology Design for Citizen Empowerment Erhardt

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluating Civic Technology Design for Citizen Empowerment Erhardt Evaluating Civic Technology Design for Citizen Empowerment by Erhardt Graeff B.S., Rochester Institute of Technology (2006) B.S., Rochester Institute of Technology (2007) M.Phil., University of Cambridge (2008) S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2014) Submitted to the Program in Media Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Media Arts and Sciences at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2018 c Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2018. All rights reserved. Author............................................................................ Program in Media Arts and Sciences May 4, 2018 Certified by........................................................................ Ethan Zuckerman Associate Professor of the Practice Program in Media Arts and Sciences Thesis Supervisor Accepted by....................................................................... Tod Machover Academic Head Program in Media Arts and Sciences 2 Evaluating Civic Technology Design for Citizen Empowerment by Erhardt Graeff Submitted to the Program in Media Arts and Sciences on May 4, 2018, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Media Arts and Sciences Abstract Civic technology should empower us as citizens. Despite its breadth as a field, civic technology often takes its lead from Silicon Valley companies that espouse design goals potentially hazardous to participatory democracy. In this dissertation, I explore: How might we design civic technologies for citizen empowerment and evaluate their impact on this goal? With their growing role as mediators of democracy, it is insufficient for civic technology designers to evaluate their designs in terms of ease of use and increased engagement with their platform. Research from political and developmental psychol- ogy shows the importance to lifelong civic engagement of learning experiences that cultivate a citizen's perception they can make change (political efficacy) and their belief in having responsibilities to the public good (civic identity). To achieve these positive feedback loops, we need a richer framework for civic technology design. This dissertation proposes two solutions: 1) empowerment-based design principles for civic technology and 2) a prototype toolkit for evaluating the impact of civic tech- nology on political efficacy. Because empowerment is contextual, the proposals here focus on tools and platforms built to support \monitorial citizenship," an increasingly popular form of civic engagement aimed at holding institutions accountable. To see these solutions in action, I report on a case study of SeeClickFix, a civic technology company that builds tools enabling citizens to report infrastructure problems to local governments. Two surveys of political efficacy and a randomized experiment with active users of SeeClickFix, followed by interviews with SeeClickFix staff, indicate the validity and utility of evaluating political efficacy as a measure of empowerment as well as the limitations of testing for incremental improvements. Thesis Supervisor: Ethan Zuckerman Title: Associate Professor of the Practice Program in Media Arts and Sciences 3 4 This doctoral thesis has been examined by the following committee: Ethan Zuckerman. Chair, Thesis Committee Associate Professor of the Practice Massachusetts Institute of Technology Peter Levine . Member, Thesis Committee Lincoln Filene Professor of Citizenship and Public Affairs Tufts University Evan Lieberman . Member, Thesis Committee Total Professor of Political Science and Contemporary Africa Massachusetts Institute of Technology Winter Mason . Member, Thesis Committee Data Scientist Facebook 5 6 Acknowledgments This dissertation is dedicated to my son Nikolai. He can earn as many or as few academic degrees as he wishes; I simply hope he is blessed with a lifetime of curiosity, inquiring both deeply and widely. Thank you to my wife, Kate. You make all things in my life possible; I would be lost without you. This is as much your PhD as it is mine. Thank you to my Mom, Dad, and sister Lydia. You have supported me through an absurd amount of education. Thank you to my advisor Ethan. You have pushed me to be more creative, impactful, and thoughtful since before I was your student. You are a dear friend and colleague. I am going to miss teaching, writing, speaking, and organizing alongside you, but I know that this dissertation also marks a beginning with opportunities to collaborate even more. Thank you to my committee: Peter, Evan, and Winter. Peter, apart from Ethan, you have been the most influential mentor in my life over the past few years; I have so much more to learn from you and look forward to our next chance to work together. Evan, I couldn't be more thankful for your willingness to join this unorthodox disser- tation and lend your expertise; I have grown a lot as a scholar thanks to your feedback. Winter, your important work at Facebook directly inspired this dissertation|it lit- erally would not exist without you; I'm proud to call you a friend and colleague. Thank you to J. Nathan Matias and Andrew Ho. Nathan, your friendship, col- legiality, and dedication to service continue to inspire me and illuminate my path toward doing impactful work. I miss you terribly, and yet you always find time to help me out no matter where you are or how busy. This dissertation does not exist without your eye for statistics and experimentation and your unending support. An- drew, your tutelage in my general exams and in coursework through all things data analysis and psychometrics, including teaching Nathan and I how to be thoughtful and rigorous social scientists, laid the foundations for this study. Thank you to my MIT Center for Civic Media family, who have given me the great 7 gifts of a loving community and of a sense of direction toward what empowerment really means: Abdulrahman, Alexis, Ali, Anushka, Bex, Catherine, Charlie, Chelsea, Cindy, Dan, Ed, Emilie, Ethan, Heather, Gordon, Jia, Joy, Jude, Lorrie, Luis, Matt C., Matt S., Mariel, Molly, Natalie, Nathan, Pablo, Petey, Rahul, Sands, Sasha, Whitney, Willow, and many more! Thank you to Samidh Chakrabarti and Funda Kivran-Swaine for hiring me at Facebook to explore these questions around the world, and for being on the vanguard of ethical civic technology design. Thank you to Kate Krontiris for your path-breaking work on civic technology and impact and for inviting me to be a part of the movement as a fellow researcher. I am continually inspired by you; I strive to be as thoughtful and generous in as many aspects of my life as you are. Thank you to the kind baristas at Peet's Coffee in Harvard Square, Starbucks in Davis Square, and the Tower Caf at Tufts University's Tisch Library for remembering my name and preferences and putting up with me during long stretches of writing and editing. And thank you to the acquisitions and circulation staff at the MIT Libraries who acquired and reserved over 80 books for me over the course of 6 years. Even if this dissertation accomplishes nothing else, I know it helped curate a collection of materials on civic engagement and civic technology at MIT that will serve future students investigating similar questions. 8 Contents List of Figures 13 List of Tables 15 1 The Need for Empowerment-based Design and Evaluation 17 1.1 Defining the Problem . 19 1.1.1 The Story of We the People . 19 1.1.2 The Logic of Civic Technology . 24 1.1.3 The Civic Empowerment Gap . 28 1.2 A Framework for Democracy, Citizen Empowerment, and the Role of Civic Technology . 30 1.3 Research Questions . 35 1.4 Scope of this Dissertation . 35 1.5 A Preview of Chapters 2{7 . 36 2 Citizenship, Civic Learning, and Empowerment in the Current Age of Civic Technology 39 2.1 Education and Equality . 39 2.2 Theorizing Civic Learning and Political Socialization . 42 2.3 The Need for Digital Literacy . 45 2.4 New Media, New Civics? . 48 2.5 From Voice to Empowerment . 51 9 3 Defining Monitorial Citizenship 55 3.1 History of the term \Monitorial Citizen" . 56 3.2 Contemporary Definitions and Examples of Monitorial Citizenship . 58 3.3 Locating Monitorial Citizenship within Contemporary Debates of Demo- cratic Theory and Practice . 61 3.3.1 Postmodern Citizenship . 61 3.3.2 Counter-Democracy . 62 3.3.3 Eyes on the Street . 63 3.3.4 Strong Democracy and the Participatory Citizen . 64 3.3.5 Everyday Politics and Public Work . 64 3.3.6 Connective Action . 65 3.3.7 The Actualizing Citizen . 66 3.3.8 Participatory Politics . 66 3.3.9 Sousveillance . 67 3.3.10 Monitory Democracy . 67 3.3.11 Participatory Governance . 68 3.3.12 Social Monitoring . 69 3.3.13 Accountability Technologies . 69 3.4 Why use \Citizenship" . 70 3.5 SeeClickFix as Monitorial Citizenship . 71 4 Empowerment-based Design Principles for Civic Technology and Monitorial Citizenship 73 4.1 Point of Departure: Feminist HCI . 76 4.2 Principle 1: Be Inclusive at Every Stage . 77 4.3 Principle 2: Give Users Agency . 81 4.4 Principle 3: Provide Opportunities for Reflection and Discourse . 84 4.4.1 Feedback Loops . 85 4.4.2 Deliberation . 86 10 4.5 Principle 4: Foster and Respect Communities . 87 4.6 Principle 5: Tell Stories with Data . 90 4.6.1 Leverage facts and data . 90 4.6.2 Personal experiences are data too . 91 4.6.3 Thinking narratively . 92 4.7 Principle 6: Anticipate Breakdown and Evaluate Rigorously . 93 4.7.1 mySociety and Facebook Research Programs . 94 4.7.2 Representation in Research . 96 4.8 On Institutionalization . 96 4.9 Evaluating SeeClickFix according to Empowerment-based Design Principles . 99 4.9.1 Inclusivity and Agency . 99 4.9.2 Reflection and Discourse . 100 4.9.3 Communities . 101 4.9.4 Storytelling with Data . 101 4.9.5 Evaluation . 102 5 Toward an Empowerment-based Research Toolkit (Methods) 103 5.1 Why Study Political Efficacy? .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Enhancing the Contribution of Digitalisation to the Smart Cities of the Future
    ENHANCING THE CONTRIBUTION OF DIGITALISATION TO THE SMART CITIES OF THE FUTURE 1 │ ENHANCING THE CONTRIBUTION OF DIGITALISATION TO THE SMART CITIES OF THE FUTURE PUBE 2 │ About the OECD The OECD is a unique forum where governments work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation. The OECD is also at the forefront of efforts to understand and to help governments respond to new developments and concerns, such as corporate governance, the information economy and the challenges of an ageing population. The Organisation provides a setting where governments can compare policy experiences, seek answers to common problems, identify good practice and work to co-ordinate domestic and international policies. About the Centre for Entrepreneurship, SMEs, Regions and Cities The Centre helps local, regional and national governments unleash the potential of entrepreneurs and small and medium-sized enterprises, promote inclusive and sustainable regions and cities, boost local job creation and implement sound tourism policies. Find out more about the OECD work on: http://www.oecd.org/regional/urban-development.htm © OECD 2019 Image credits: Getty Images / Bulat Silvia This document is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of OECD member countries. The document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. ENHANCING THE CONTRIBUTION OF DIGITALISATION TO THE SMART CITIES OF THE FUTURE This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area.
    [Show full text]
  • A Theoretical Model of How Digital Platforms for Public Consultation Can Leverage Deliberation to Boost Democratic Legitimacy
    Gastil, J. (2021). A Theoretical Model of How Digital Platforms for Public Consultation Can Leverage Deliberation to Boost Democratic Legitimacy. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 17(1), pp. 78-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.963 SYMPOSIUM A Theoretical Model of How Digital Platforms for Public Consultation Can Leverage Deliberation to Boost Democratic Legitimacy John Gastil The declining legitimacy of public institutions imperils modern democratic systems, yet deliberative remedies to this problem have not undergone systematic testing. The emergence of robust civic technology provides an opportunity to trace the effects of deliberation on legitimacy. Online civic platforms connecting large publics with democratic governments enable researchers to test the strength of each link that leads from public engagement to institutional legitimacy by the way of deliberation. I present such a theoretical model of these linkages and specify sets of working hypotheses regarding public participation, deliberative quality, decision quality, government responsiveness, institutional legitimacy and opportunities for empowered public engagement. Keywords: civic technology; deliberation online; digital democracy; government responsiveness; public consultation Introduction Many efforts to design online discussions have aimed, From the outset, deliberative theory has sought to explicitly or otherwise, at steering the public toward a understand and address legitimation problems in more deliberative mode of citizenship and governance democracy (Barber 1984; Cohen 1989; Habermas 1975), (Coleman & Moss 2012) as a means toward boosting and some recent reformulations of deliberative theory system legitimacy (Gastil & Richards 2017). Preliminary have aimed to make this legitimating function more assessments suggest that such efforts may prove effective explicit (Curato & Böker 2016; Richards & Gastil 2015; (Patel et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Internet and Engaged Citizenship
    The Internet and Engaged Citizenship David Karpf american academy of arts & sciences The Internet and Engaged Citizenship David Karpf © 2019 by the American Academy of Arts & Sciences. All rights reserved. ISBN: 0-87724-128-7 This publication is available online at www.amacad.org /project/practice-democratic -citizenship. Suggested citation: David Karpf, The Internet and Engaged Citizenship (Cambridge, Mass.: American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2019). This paper is part of the American Academy’s Commission on the Practice of Democratic Citizenship. The statements made and views expressed in this publication are those held by the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the Officers and Members of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences. Please direct inquiries to: American Academy of Arts & Sciences 136 Irving Street Cambridge, MA 02138 Telephone: 617-576-5000 Fax: 617-576-5050 Email: [email protected] Web: www.amacad.org Contents 1 Introduction 2 Why Understanding the Digital Citizen Proves So Difficult 3 The Pace of Internet Time 7 The Proprietary Data Gap 10 The Internet and Engaged Citizenship, Circa 2019 10 The Internet and Political Polarization 14 Digital Pathways for Participation 17 The Earnest Internet Versus the Ambivalent Internet 20 The Quiet Demise of Web 2.0 23 Digital Democracy and the Field of Dreams Fallacy 26 Conclusion 26 The Upside of Internet Time 27 Bridging the Proprietary Data Gap 28 New Policy Challenges for the Platform Era 29 About the Author Introduction The Internet is everywhere. Years ago, it was limited to desktop comput- ers, synonymous with the static and whir of a connecting modem.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Design and Implementation of Civic Technologies in Resource-Limited Public Organizations
    Understanding the Design and Implementation of Civic Technologies in Resource-Limited Public Organizations by Youyang Hou A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Information) in The University of Michigan 2018 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Cliff Lampe, Chair Assistant Professor Tawanna Dillahunt. Assistant Professor Robert Goodspeed Assistant Professor Sarita Yardi Schoenebeck Youyang Hou [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6453-1260 © Youyang Hou 2018 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Writing a dissertation was the most challenging task I have ever tackled, and I am glad that I was not alone in the process. Many people have helped pave the way to the successful completion of this dissertation. I would like to take the opportunity to express my gratitude for their support, encouragement, and companionship. To begin with, I thank all of my dissertation committee members, and in particular my advisor, Dr. Cliff Lampe. It would be impossible for me to have made it this far without his support, guidance, and feedback. I am also grateful for the flexibility and accommodation he provided me in the final year of my dissertation, when there were many unexpected occurrences in my life. It made studying thousands of miles away from home a much better experience. I was fortunate to have Dr. Sarita Yardi Schoenebeck, Dr. Tawanna Dillahunt, and Dr. Robert Goodspeed as additional members on my committee. Dr. Schoenebeck and Dr. Dillahunt joined my dissertation committee when I was at the critical stage of field prelim; they have provided invaluable feedback on my analysis and writing. I also appreciate the fresh perspectives and in-depth knowledge about urban planning provided by the cognate member of my committee, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Software Engineering in Civic Tech a Case Study About Code for Ireland
    Software Engineering in Civic Tech A Case Study about Code for Ireland Antti Knutas Victoria Palacin Giovanni Maccani Markus Helfert LUT University LUT University Maynooth University Dublin City University School of Engineering Sciences School of Engineering Sciences School of Business School of Computing Lappeenranta, Finland Lappeenranta, Finland Maynooth, Ireland Dublin, Ireland antti.knutas@lut.fi victoria.palacin@lut.fi [email protected] [email protected] Abstract—Civic grassroots have proven their ability to create useful and scalable software that addresses pressing social needs. Although software engineering plays a fundamental role in the process of creating civic technology, academic literature that analyses the software development processes of civic tech grassroots is scarce. This paper aims to advance the understanding of how civic grassroots tackle the different activities in their software development processes. In this study, we followed the formation of two projects in a civic tech group (Code for Ireland) seeking to understand how their development processes evolved over time, and how the group carried out their work in creating new technology. Our preliminary findings show that such groups are capable of setting up systematic software engineering processes that address software specification, development, validation, and evolution. While they were able to deliver software according to self-specified quality standards, the group has challenges in requirements specification, stakeholder Figure 1. Palette of Public Participation in Civic Technology adapted from [4] engagement, and reorienting from development to product delivery. Software engineering methods and tools can effectively support the future of civic technologies and potentially improve [7, 8], research in the context of software engineering practices their management, quality, and durability.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government in a Digital World / the Emergence of Digital Local Government of the Broader Local Government Workforce
    Local Government in a Digital World / The Emergence of Digital Local Government of the broader local government workforce. Phil Bertolini, CIO and deputy county executive for Oakland County, Mich., notes, “Engaging n the past few years, we’ve seen a remarkable increase in the in the practice of innovation has created an environment where quantity, sophistication and usefulness of mobile and Web local governments can work across government lines to leverage Ie-government apps at the local level. We’ve also seen rapid growth technology dollars with many localities. Intergovernmental collabora- of investments in “civic tech” and the resulting burst of local govern- tion has become the standard for lowering technology costs while ment application startups, entrepreneurs and electronically engaged embracing partnerships.” citizens. It’s worth noting this has happened in spite of — or perhaps because of — an economic downturn that slowed IT spending at Localities that successfully implemented these strategies have reaped all levels of government. There is evidence that rather than hunker- the dual benefits of freeing up resources for reinvestment in innovative down, leading local governments have decided to double-down on new services and citizen-engagement tools, as well as creating a base their commitments to digital government initiatives, with the purpose of integrated data to fuel the interaction. The residual benefits of cross- of reducing service costs and increasing citizen engagement and boundary collaborations have kept the fires stoked. satisfaction. To provide citizen-facing applications, local governments are increas- “The good news is that public sector organizations have largely ingly leveraging outside resources, including established companies followed the commercial sector, and are now operating within the with robust local government platforms, entrepreneurial startups, digital world.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkel Udel 0060D 14
    THE DIFFUSION OF CIVIC TECHNOLOGY: HOW TECHNOLOGY AND DEVOLUTION ARE RESHAPING CIVIC LIFE IN URBAN AMERICA by Eli Turkel A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Urban Affairs and Public Policy. Spring, 2020 © 2020, Turkel All Rights Reserved THE DIFFUSION OF CIVIC TECHNOLOGY: HOW TECHNOLOGY AND DEVOLUTION ARE RESHAPING CIVIC LIFE IN URBAN AMERICA by Eli Turkel Approved: __________________________________________________________ Maria P. Aristigueta, D.P.A. Director of the Joseph R. Biden, Jr. School of Public Policy and Administration Approved: __________________________________________________________ John A. Pelesko, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences Approved: __________________________________________________________ Douglas J. Doren, Ph.D. Interim Vice Provost for Graduate and Professional Education and Dean of the Graduate College I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: __________________________________________________________ John McNutt, Ph.D. Professor in charge of dissertation I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: __________________________________________________________ Jonathan Justice, Ph.D. Member of dissertation committee I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: __________________________________________________________ Tibor Toth, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence of Civic Tech: Investments in a Growing Field
    The Emergence of Civic Tech: Investments in a Growing Field December 2013 2 About At Knight Foundation, we strive to Knight embarked on an analysis earlier support informed and engaged this year to examine clusters of inno- communities. With the proliferation of vation and investment within the field technology in everyday life over the of civic tech. Rather than performing a past decade, Knight has increasingly run-of-the-mill landscape review with funded new technologies designed to stakeholder interviews, we decided to improve the health and vitality of experiment with a new set of research cities. Since 2010, Knight has invested tools. We partnered with Quid, a firm more than $25 million in such that specializes in data analytics and projects, ranging from government network analysis, to map the field of data access platforms to new tools for civic tech through semantic analysis community planning to online neigh- and private and philanthropic Authors borhood forums. investment data. Mayur Patel VP/Strategy and Assessment Over the past two years, we’ve This report summarizes key findings Knight Foundation witnessed through our work a and implications from the analysis. groundswell of interest at the nexus of We hope this experiment will be Jon Sotsky technology, civic innovation, open valuable to those interested in the Director/Strategy and Assessment government and resident field of civic tech as well as organiza- Knight Foundation engagement. Though the terminology tions looking to advance the use of may vary, more and more funders, big data in the social sector. This study Sean Gourley investors and practitioners have joined is a first foray into analyzing the civic Co-founder & CTO this emerging “civic tech” field.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Transformation and the Futures of Civic Space to 2030
    DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION AND THE FUTURES OF CIVIC SPACE TO 2030 OECD DEVELOPMENT POLICY PAPERS June 2020 No. 29 | 3 OECD Policy Papers Disclaimer This paper is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed do not necessarily represent the official views of the OECD member countries. This document, as well as any data and any map include herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. The document was authorised for publication by Jorge Moreira da Silva, Director of the Development Cooperation Directorate. Please cite this paper as OECD 2020, Digital Transformation and the Futures of Civic Space to 2030, OECD Development Policy Paper 29. DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION AND THE FUTURES OF CIVIC SPACE TO 2030 © OECD 2020 4 | Abstract Digital transformation is rapidly altering civic space, challenging the ways in which members of the OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) and other providers of development co-operation strive to promote an enabling environment for civil society to contribute to sustainable development. This paper aims to support DAC members and other providers of development co-operation to integrate the implications of a range of plausible futures of civic space into positive policy action today. To this end, it provides an overview of the variables (i.e. current trends, drivers of change and uncertainties) that may determine the trajectory of civic space in the context of digital transformation; identifies four plausible futures that emerge from four different logical interactions of these variables - that could materialise over a ten-year horizon and be fully realised by 2030; and draws policy implications to support DAC members and other providers in designing development co-operation policies that best leverage the opportunities that digital transformation offers while mitigating its risks.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Scrutiny of Automated Decisions: Early Lessons and Emerging Methods an Upturn and Omidyar Network Report Acknowledgments
    Public Scrutiny of Automated Decisions: Early Lessons and Emerging Methods An Upturn and Omidyar Network Report Acknowledgments We would like to acknowledge the many people who gave us helpful insight and feedback during the course of our research, including Salmana Ahmed at Omidyar Network, Gemma Galdon Clavell at Eticas Research & Consulting, Luis Fernando Garcia at R3D, Luciano Floridi at the University of Oxford, John Havens at IEEE, Gus Hosein at Privacy International, Estelle Massé at Access Now, Valeria Milanes at ADC Digital, Vivian Ng at the Human Rights, Big Data and Technology Project at the Essex Human Rights Centre, Cathy O’Neil at O’Neil Risk Consulting & Algorithmic Auditing, Matthew Sheret at IF, Matthias Spielkamp at AlgorithmWatch, Martin Tisné at Omidyar Network, Frank Pasquale at the University of Maryland, Pablo Viollier at Derechos Digitales and Adrian Weller at the Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence. Authors Aaron Rieke is a Managing Director at Upturn. He holds a JD from Berkeley Law, with a Certificate of Law and Technology, and a BA in Philosophy from Pacific Lutheran University. Miranda Bogen is a Policy Analyst at Upturn. She holds a Master’s degree in Law and Diplomacy with a focus on international technology policy from The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts, and bachelor’s degrees in Political Science and Middle Eastern & North African Studies from UCLA. David G. Robinson is a Managing Director and co-founder at Upturn. He holds a JD from Yale Law School, and bachelor’s degrees in philosophy from Princeton and Oxford, where he was a Rhodes Scholar.
    [Show full text]
  • Technology and Equity in Cities Emerging Challenges and Opportunities
    RESEARCH TO ACTION L AB RESEARCH REPORT Technology and Equity in Cities Emerging Challenges and Opportunities Solomon Greene Graham MacDonald Olivia Arena with Tanaya Srini, Ruth Gourevitch, Richard Ezike, and Alena Stern November 2019 ABOUT THE URBAN INSTITUTE The nonprofit Urban Institute is a leading research organization dedicated to developing evidence-based insights that improve people’s lives and strengthen communities. For 50 years, Urban has been the trusted source for rigorous analysis of complex social and economic issues; strategic advice to policymakers, philanthropists, and practitioners; and new, promising ideas that expand opportunities for all. Our work inspires effective decisions that advance fairness and enhance the well-being of people and places. Copyright © November 2019. Urban Institute. Permission is granted for reproduction of this file, with attribution to the Urban Institute. Cover photo via Songquan Deng/Shutterstock. Contents Acknowledgments v Executive Summary vi Emerging Opportunities and Challenges vi Paths Forward vii Introduction 1 Smart Infrastructure 2 Opportunities 2 Connecting Neighborhoods and Residents to Information and Services 2 Targeting Interventions for Greater Impact 4 Generating Revenue to Support Equity-Focused Initiatives 5 Challenges 6 Risking Misuse of Data 6 Diverting Resources from Equity-Focused Initiatives 8 Looking Ahead 8 Shared Mobility 9 Opportunities 10 Reducing Transportation Costs for Low-Income Residents 10 Improving Transportation Access in Underserved Neighborhoods 11
    [Show full text]
  • ICT and Citizen Efficacy: the Role of Civic Technology in Facilitating Government Accountability and Citizen Confidence
    ICT and Citizen Efficacy: The Role of Civic Technology in Facilitating Government Accountability and Citizen Confidence Rebecca Rumbul To cite this version: Rebecca Rumbul. ICT and Citizen Efficacy: The Role of Civic Technology in Facilitating Government Accountability and Citizen Confidence. 6th IFIP World Information Technology Forum (WITFOR), Sep 2016, San José, Costa Rica. pp.213-222, 10.1007/978-3-319-44447-5_20. hal-01429750 HAL Id: hal-01429750 https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01429750 Submitted on 9 Jan 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License Full Paper –WITFOR 2016 ICT and citizen efficacy: The role of civic technology in facilitating government accountability and citizen confidence Rebecca Rumbul mySociety, London UK [email protected] Abstract. This paper examines whether civic technology ICTs provide an effective method for enhancing the political efficacy of citizens and their perceived ac- countability of governments. Using a survey-based methodology, a quantitative analysis was conducted of the users of civic action sites in the UK, Kenya, South Africa and USA. The key question examined is whether the particularized or cit- izen-audit actions that these sites facilitate have a spill-over effect in altering the level to which citizens believe they are able to hold government to account.
    [Show full text]