Royal Polis Policy in the Seleukid Heartland

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Royal Polis Policy in the Seleukid Heartland ROYAL POLIS POLICY IN THE SELEUKID HEARTLAND by Christopher Mark de L’isle A thesis submitted to Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Classics VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON ANNO DOMINI NOSTRI MMXIII ABSTRACT In the Hellenistic Period most of the Greek poleis (city-states) came under the control of the Greco-Macedonian kings. The ideology of the poleis, which stressed the importance of autonomy, conflicted with the reality of royal domination. In Western Asia Minor, this conflict was resolved by presenting the relationship between king and polis as one of free association, in which the poleis were allowed a large amount of autonomy. The kings used ideas of reciprocity to tie the poleis to them and worked to make their rule as amenable as possible, while the poleis of Western Asia Minor continued to aspire to complete independence. This was not the only possible resolution of the conflict between polis autonomy and royal dominance, however. In the Seleukid heartland of Syria and Mesopotamia the Seleukids founded and maintained new poleis. By means of names, myths, and symbols, the identities of these poleis were closely linked to the Seleukid dynasty. As a result, expressions of polis identity were expressions of loyalty to the dynasty, rather than of opposition. Their internal structures were based around an alliance between the royally- appointed epistatēs and the magistrates of the city, who represented a small civic elite. Royal support was thus important to the internal power structure of these poleis. The poleis of the Seleukid heartland did not pursue full independence, even when the Seleukid royal power collapsed at the end of the Hellenistic period because, entirely unlike the poleis of Western Asia Minor, submission to a higher power was a central part of their identities and internal structures. ΑΝΑΘΕΣΙΣ Σσγγραυέως Χριστουέροσ Νήσοσ γνώμη ἐπεὶ νὗηνη αἴηηνη πνιιῶλ κὲλ ἀξίζησλ νὐδὲ θαθῶλ νὐδελὸο η῅ο ρσξὶο η῅ο ηνχησλ ὠθέιεηαο ἀηειεπηήηνπ η῅ζδε η῅ο ζέζεσο, Ἁξξίεηή ηε ηῶλ Κεξξῶλ, ἥο ὁ ραξηεληηζκὸο θαὶ ηὸ θξφληκνλ ηῶη ἀιεζεῖ ηφπση πεξὶ η῅ο ζέζεσο θφβνπο ἐηίζεζαλ, θαὶ Αἰκίιηα ΢ίκσλνο, ἥο γελέζιηα ἄξηζησλ ἐλ ηῶη ἔηεη ἟κεξῶλ ἤλ, ηήλδε ὅιελ ζέζηλ ἐμαλαγλνῦζαη βνπιεχζαζαη πνιιὰ ἐκνὶ πεηζνκέλση πιεῖζηα, νἱ δὲ ἐθ ηνῦ Νίθεο ἐλ ἖ιιηγγηείᾳ ΢νθηζηεξίνπ ηῶλ ἀξραίσλ θηιφζνθνη: Καῖζαξ ηε Σάησλ ὁ ζνθψηαηνο ηνῦ πφλνπ δηδάζθαινο, θαὶ Ἰνῦδη Μνλνκαρνῦζα ἟ θηινγξάκκαηνο, θαὶ Μαηζαῖνο ὇πιίηεο (θαίπεξ νἰρφκελνο πξὸο ἀξθηηθά) Ἄξηεκίο ηε Κηξθαηαπφιεψο ἟ ἟κᾶο ἗ιιεληθὴλ δηδάμαζα θαὶ ΢ίκσλ Ἀπίνπ ὁ ἟κᾶο Ῥσκαηθὴλ δηδάμαο, θαὶ Μάξθνο Ἀλαθηίδεο ὁ ἑθαηέξαλ δηδάμαο θαὶ νἱ ηνῦ ΢νθηζηεξίνπ θαὶ η῅ο βηβιηνζήθεο ἄξρνληεο (πιὴλ νὐ ηῶλ θαθῶλ αἰηίσλ η῅ο ἔμσ η῅ο ζπξίδνο η῅ο ζνξπβψδνπο θαὶ δπζψδνπο ηῶλ αἰζρξῶλ ζηνῶλ πᾶλ ηὸ ὅινλ ἔηνο πνηήζεσο), νἱ δὲ ζπζρνιαζηαί ηε θαὶ ζπκπφηαη: Ἀιέμαλδξφο ηε Ϝηιηαθφο ὁ πνιχγισζζνο, Γαληήι ηε ΢θάπησλ ὁ πνιιὰ ινμηθὰ ζθψκκαηα θᾶο, Ἅλλα Ληζνπξγή ηε θαὶ Ινπιία ΢ίκσλνο θαὶ Κακέξσλ ΢ηάλησλ θαὶ ΢ακνπήι Γ῅ινο, ζὺλ νἷο ἀλαγηλψζθσ ἗ιιεληζηί ηε πνιιὰ θαὶ Ῥσκαηζηὶ κνπζνπνηῶ, ηνῦ ἐκνῦ δὲ γέλνπο, νἱ κέλ πάππνη: Αὔβξεο κέλ ηε θαὶ Μαξία Νήζνπ, Θσκᾶο δέ ηε θαὶ Γσξνζέα Μαπξῶλ, νἱ δὲ γνλεῖο: Μάξθνο ηε θαὶ Ἰὼ Νήζνπ, ὁ δὲ ἀδειθὸο Μαξηίλνο ηε Νήζνπ θαὶ ἟ αὐηνῦ θίιε Αἵδη Θδηνῦ, νἳ ἐλ ηῶη δαπέδση θαζεχδεηλ κε εἴσλ, νἱ δὲ ἀπὸ Αὐθιαληίδνο: ἄδεινο Ἰσάλλεο ηε Γξᾶληφο ηε Μάξθνο ηε θαὶ Ἀιεμάλδξα Νήζνπ, νἱ δὲ ἀπὸ η῅ο ἞νῦο η῅ο ρψξαο: Μαξηίλνο ηε Μίσθψ ηε Ξάλδξνο ηε θαὶ Οὐάιηεξ Μαπξῶλ κεγάισλ ηηκῶλ ἀμηῶληαη, ὅπσο ἐκὴλ ράξηλ γηγλψζθσζηλ θαὶ ηὴλ δηθαίαλ ηηκὴλ δέρσληαη, δέδνρζαί κνη ηνὺο ἀλαγξαθνκέλνπο κὲλ εὐραξηζηηθῶο ηηκᾶλ, ὑπηζρλεῖζζαη δὲ δψζεηλ ἑθάζηνηο μέζηελ ηηλὰ πίλνπ ἠ θχιηθά ηηλα νἴλνπ ἠ ὁπνίαο πφζεσο δέσζηλ, ἀλαγξαθ῅λαη δὲ ἐλ η῅ηδε ζρέδεη ηὰ αὐηῶλ ὀλφκαηα. ἔτοσς ‘γι καὶ τιλιοστοῦ ‘β μηνὸς Ξανθικοῦ ‘δ CONTENTS Abbreviations:.................................................................................................................viii Figures: One: Places Mentioned, Asia Minor.................................................................ix Two: Places Mentioned, Syria................................................................................x Three: Places Mentioned, Near East……………………………………………xi Four: Seleukid Genealogy……………………………………………………...xii Introduction……………………………………………………………………………....1 Chapter One: Kings and Cities in the Hellenistic Period……………………………..4 The Hellenistic King................................................................................................4 The Hellenistic Polis..............................................................................................12 The Relationship between Kings and Poleis in Seleukid Asia Minor...................21 Civic Status in Practice...........................................................................................26 Conclusion..............................................................................................................38 Chapter Two: The Seleukid Heartland & Reasons for Colonisation..........................40 Overview of the Heartland.....................................................................................40 Were the Foundations of the Heartland Poleis?.....................................................51 Role of the Foundations....................................................................................55 Coinage and Minting..............................................................................................69 Conclusion..............................................................................................................76 Chapter Three: The King & His Poleis..........................................................................78 Royal Interference in Polis Affairs........................................................................78 Epigraphic Evidence...............................................................................................83 Officials and Institutions within the Poleis............................................................89 The End of the Seleukid Kingdom.......................................................................103 Conclusion: The Seleukid Polis...................................................................................111 Appendix One: Inscriptions Used.................................................................................113 Appendix Two: Coins Used...........................................................................................162 Bibliography:..................................................................................................................172 vii ABBREVIATIONS AD: Sachs & Hermann Hunger. 1988. Astronomical Diaries and Related Texts from Babylonia. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen. BCHP: Finkel I. & R.J. van der Spek. Forthcoming. Babylonian Chronicles of the Hellenistic Period. BMC: Gardner, Percy. 1878. A Catalogue of Greek Coins: The Seleukid Kings of Syria in the British Museum. London: British Museum Press. ESM: Newell, Edward Theodore. 1938. The Coinage of the Eastern Seleucid Mints from Seleucus I to Antiochus III. New York, NY: American Numismatic Society. F. Amyzon: Robert Jeanne & Louis Robert. 1983. Fouilles d'Amyzon en Carie, I. Exploration, histoire, monnaies et inscriptions. Paris: De Boccard. GCS: Wroth, Warwick William. 1899. Catalogue of the Greek Coins of Galatia, Cappadocia and Syria. London: British Museum Press. Hefzibah: Landau, Y.H. 1966. ―A Greek Inscription Found near Hefzibah.‖ Israel Exploration Journal 16(1): 54-70. I. Erythrae: Engelmann, Helmut & Reinhold Merkelbach. 1973. Die Inschriften von Erythrai und Klazomenai. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt Verlag. I. Priene: Fredrich, C. et al. 1906. Inschriften von Priene. Berlin: Verlag von Georg Reimer. IGLS: Jalabert, Louis, René Mouterde et al. 1870-1970. Inscriptions Grecques et Latines de la Syrie. Paris: Libraire Orientaliste Paul Geuthner. Inscription d’Iran: Robert, Louis. 1949. ―Inscriptions Séleucides de Phrygie et d‘Iran.‖ Hellenica 7: 5-29. OGIS: Dittenberger, W. 1903-1905. Orientis Graeci Inscriptiones Selectae. Leipzig: Herzel. P.Dura: Perkins, Ann. 1959. The Excavations at Dura-Europos: Final Report V Part I: Parchments and Papyri. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. RC: Welles, Charles Bradford. 1966. Royal Correspondence in the Hellenistic Period. Rome: ―L‘Erma‖ di Bretschneider. SEG: Supplementum Epigraphicum Graecum. SC: Houghton, Arthur & Catharine Lorber. 2002. Seleucid Coins: A Comprehensive Guide. New York, NY: American Numismatic Society. SdT: Le Rider, Georges. 1998. Séleucie du Tigre: Les Monnaies Séleucides et Parthes. Florence : Casa Editrice Le Lettere. Syll3: Dittenberger, W. 1915-1924. Sylloge Inscriptionum Graecarum. 3rd Ed. Leipzig : Herzel. WSM: Newell, Edward Theodore. 1941. The Coinage of the Western Seleucid Mints from Seleucus I to Antiochus III. New York, NY: American Numismatic Society. All other abbreviations conform to those used by the 4th edition of the Oxford Classical Dictionary. viii FIGURE ONE: PLACES MENTIONED, ASIA MINOR Thrace F Chersonese J H Bithynia N E C T R P I K Iōnia D X A L Karia Pisidia S Q M G B O (base map sourced from http://commons.wikimedia.org/ Near_East_topographic_map-blank.svg) A: Alabanda H: Lampsakos X: Priēnē B: Aspendos I: Lebedos O: Rhodes C: Chios J: Lysimacheia P: Sardis D: Ephesos K: Magnēsia Q: Selgē E: Erythrai L: Milētos R: Smyrna F: Hērakleia Pontikē M: Pednelissos S: Stratonikeia G: Kōs N: Pergamōn T: Teōs ix FIGURE TWO: PLACES MENTIONED, SYRIA Kommagēnē Sōphēnē P Cilicia X L G B A K O M C D F J
Recommended publications
  • Cultural Dynamics in Ionia at the End of the Second Millennium BCE
    Cultural Dynamics in Ionia at the End of the Second Millennium BCE: New Archaeological Perspectives and Prospects Edited e-Thesis The results, discussions and conclusions presented herein are identical to those in the printed version. This electronic version of the thesis has been edited solely to ensure conformance with copyright legislation and all excisions are noted in the text. The final, awarded and examined version is available for consultation via the University Library. Rik Vaessen PhD The University of Sheffield Department of Archaeology May 2014 Table of Contents List of Figures iii List of Tables vi Acknowledgments vii Abstract ix Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Setting the stage 1 1.2. Introducing the Ionians 4 1.3. Finding Late Bronze and Early Iron Age Ionia 12 Phokaia 14 Panaztepe-Menemen 16 Smyrna-Bayraklı 17 Limantepe/Klazomenai 19 Erythrai 23 Chios: Emporio and Kato Phana 24 Teos 26 Kolophon 26 Klaros 28 Metropolis-Bademgedi ǧi Tepe 29 Ephesos (Apaša) 31 Ku şadası-Kadıkalesi 33 Samos: Heraion and Pythagorio 33 Miletos 35 The Miletos-area: Assesos and Teichiussa 38 Cine-Tepecik 38 1.4. Outline of the study 39 Chapter 2. Tracing the Ionians in modern scholarship 43 2.1. Introduction 43 2.2. Dorians and Ionians: 1750-1870 43 2.3. The Ionians between 1870 and 1939 54 2.4. The Ionians and their migration become visible … or not? (1945-present) 60 2.5. The current debate in perspective 69 2.6. Final remarks 78 Chapter 3. Theoretical and methodological considerations 79 3.1. Introduction 79 3.2. Theory: some critical remarks 79 3.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Seven Churches of Revelation Turkey
    TRAVEL GUIDE SEVEN CHURCHES OF REVELATION TURKEY TURKEY Pergamum Lesbos Thyatira Sardis Izmir Chios Smyrna Philadelphia Samos Ephesus Laodicea Aegean Sea Patmos ASIA Kos 1 Rhodes ARCHEOLOGICAL MAP OF WESTERN TURKEY BULGARIA Sinanköy Manya Mt. NORTH EDİRNE KIRKLARELİ Selimiye Fatih Iron Foundry Mosque UNESCO B L A C K S E A MACEDONIA Yeni Saray Kırklareli Höyük İSTANBUL Herakleia Skotoussa (Byzantium) Krenides Linos (Constantinople) Sirra Philippi Beikos Palatianon Berge Karaevlialtı Menekşe Çatağı Prusias Tauriana Filippoi THRACE Bathonea Küçükyalı Ad hypium Morylos Dikaia Heraion teikhos Achaeology Edessa Neapolis park KOCAELİ Tragilos Antisara Abdera Perinthos Basilica UNESCO Maroneia TEKİRDAĞ (İZMİT) DÜZCE Europos Kavala Doriskos Nicomedia Pella Amphipolis Stryme Işıklar Mt. ALBANIA Allante Lete Bormiskos Thessalonica Argilos THE SEA OF MARMARA SAKARYA MACEDONIANaoussa Apollonia Thassos Ainos (ADAPAZARI) UNESCO Thermes Aegae YALOVA Ceramic Furnaces Selectum Chalastra Strepsa Berea Iznik Lake Nicea Methone Cyzicus Vergina Petralona Samothrace Parion Roman theater Acanthos Zeytinli Ada Apamela Aisa Ouranopolis Hisardere Dasaki Elimia Pydna Barçın Höyük BTHYNIA Galepsos Yenibademli Höyük BURSA UNESCO Antigonia Thyssus Apollonia (Prusa) ÇANAKKALE Manyas Zeytinlik Höyük Arisbe Lake Ulubat Phylace Dion Akrothooi Lake Sane Parthenopolis GÖKCEADA Aktopraklık O.Gazi Külliyesi BİLECİK Asprokampos Kremaste Daskyleion UNESCO Höyük Pythion Neopolis Astyra Sundiken Mts. Herakleum Paşalar Sarhöyük Mount Athos Achmilleion Troy Pessinus Potamia Mt.Olympos
    [Show full text]
  • Politics in Classical Greece: the an Ture of the Polis and the Origins of the Rule of Law Thomas D
    Sacred Heart University Review Volume 9 Article 4 Issue 2 The Greeks Institute Spring 1989 Politics in Classical Greece: The aN ture of the Polis and the Origins of the Rule of Law Thomas D. Curran Ph.D. Sacred Heart University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/shureview Recommended Citation Curran, Thomas D. Ph.D. (1989) "Politics in Classical Greece: The aN ture of the Polis and the Origins of the Rule of Law," Sacred Heart University Review: Vol. 9 : Iss. 2 , Article 4. Available at: http://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/shureview/vol9/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the SHU Press Publications at DigitalCommons@SHU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sacred Heart University Review by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@SHU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Politics in Classical Greece: The aN ture of the Polis and the Origins of the Rule of Law Cover Page Footnote This article is based on a lecture delivered at the The Greeks Institute, a series of lectures presented to secondary school teachers in the Bridgeport Public Schools during the spring of 1989. Co-sponsored by the Connecticut Humanities Council, Sacred Heart University, and the Bridgeport Public Schools, the purpose of the institute has been to provide teachers with an interdisciplinary exploration of classical Greece for the purposes of professional enrichment and curriculum development. This article is available in Sacred Heart University Review: http://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/shureview/vol9/iss2/4 Curran: Politics in Classical Greece THOMAS D.
    [Show full text]
  • CILICIA: the FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCHES in ANATOLIA1 Mark Wilson
    CILICIA: THE FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCHES IN ANATOLIA1 Mark Wilson Summary This article explores the origin of the Christian church in Anatolia. While individual believers undoubtedly entered Anatolia during the 30s after the day of Pentecost (Acts 2:9–10), the book of Acts suggests that it was not until the following decade that the first church was organized. For it was at Antioch, the capital of the Roman province of Syria, that the first Christians appeared (Acts 11:20–26). Yet two obscure references in Acts point to the organization of churches in Cilicia at an earlier date. Among the addressees of the letter drafted by the Jerusalem council were the churches in Cilicia (Acts 15:23). Later Paul visited these same churches at the beginning of his second ministry journey (Acts 15:41). Paul’s relationship to these churches points to this apostle as their founder. Since his home was the Cilician city of Tarsus, to which he returned after his conversion (Gal. 1:21; Acts 9:30), Paul was apparently active in church planting during his so-called ‘silent years’. The core of these churches undoubtedly consisted of Diaspora Jews who, like Paul’s family, lived in the region. Jews from Cilicia were members of a Synagogue of the Freedmen in Jerusalem, to which Paul was associated during his time in Jerusalem (Acts 6:9). Antiochus IV (175–164 BC) hellenized and urbanized Cilicia during his reign; the Romans around 39 BC added Cilicia Pedias to the province of Syria. Four cities along with Tarsus, located along or near the Pilgrim Road that transects Anatolia, constitute the most likely sites for the Cilician churches.
    [Show full text]
  • Hadrian and the Greek East
    HADRIAN AND THE GREEK EAST: IMPERIAL POLICY AND COMMUNICATION DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Demetrios Kritsotakis, B.A, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2008 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Fritz Graf, Adviser Professor Tom Hawkins ____________________________ Professor Anthony Kaldellis Adviser Greek and Latin Graduate Program Copyright by Demetrios Kritsotakis 2008 ABSTRACT The Roman Emperor Hadrian pursued a policy of unification of the vast Empire. After his accession, he abandoned the expansionist policy of his predecessor Trajan and focused on securing the frontiers of the empire and on maintaining its stability. Of the utmost importance was the further integration and participation in his program of the peoples of the Greek East, especially of the Greek mainland and Asia Minor. Hadrian now invited them to become active members of the empire. By his lengthy travels and benefactions to the people of the region and by the creation of the Panhellenion, Hadrian attempted to create a second center of the Empire. Rome, in the West, was the first center; now a second one, in the East, would draw together the Greek people on both sides of the Aegean Sea. Thus he could accelerate the unification of the empire by focusing on its two most important elements, Romans and Greeks. Hadrian channeled his intentions in a number of ways, including the use of specific iconographical types on the coinage of his reign and religious language and themes in his interactions with the Greeks. In both cases it becomes evident that the Greeks not only understood his messages, but they also reacted in a positive way.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Planning in the Greek Colonies in Sicily and Magna Graecia
    Urban Planning in the Greek Colonies in Sicily and Magna Graecia (8th – 6th centuries BCE) An honors thesis for the Department of Classics Olivia E. Hayden Tufts University, 2013 Abstract: Although ancient Greeks were traversing the western Mediterranean as early as the Mycenaean Period, the end of the “Dark Age” saw a surge of Greek colonial activity throughout the Mediterranean. Contemporary cities of the Greek homeland were in the process of growing from small, irregularly planned settlements into organized urban spaces. By contrast, the colonies founded overseas in the 8th and 6th centuries BCE lacked any pre-existing structures or spatial organization, allowing the inhabitants to closely approximate their conceptual ideals. For this reason the Greek colonies in Sicily and Magna Graecia, known for their extensive use of gridded urban planning, exemplified the overarching trajectory of urban planning in this period. Over the course of the 8th to 6th centuries BCE the Greek cities in Sicily and Magna Graecia developed many common features, including the zoning of domestic, religious, and political space and the implementation of a gridded street plan in the domestic sector. Each city, however, had its own peculiarities and experimental design elements. I will argue that the interplay between standardization and idiosyncrasy in each city developed as a result of vying for recognition within this tight-knit network of affluent Sicilian and South Italian cities. This competition both stimulated the widespread adoption of popular ideas and encouraged the continuous initiation of new trends. ii Table of Contents: Abstract. …………………….………………………………………………………………….... ii Table of Contents …………………………………….………………………………….…….... iii 1. Introduction …………………………………………………………………………..……….. 1 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Ortaçağ Anadolu Ticaret Yolları Yrd. Doç. Dr.Adnan ESKİKURT
    Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı 33, 2014 Güz, 15-40 Ortaçağ Anadolu Ticaret Yolları Yrd. Doç. Dr.Adnan ESKİKURT İstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi, Edebiyat Fakültesi, Tarih Bölümü [email protected] Özet Anadolu yarımadasını kat eden ticaret yollarının gelişimi Ortaçağ genelinde devam etmiştir. Bu durum, ticaret ve vergi gelirlerinin sürekliliğini garantileme arzusundaki siyasal iktidarların istikrara önem vermelerinin bir sonucudur. İmkânlarını muhafaza etmek için de sık sık askerî seferler tertip etmişlerdir. Ekseriyeti uzak ülkelerle irtibatlı, gelişmiş ve detaylı güzergâhların meydana gelişi ağırlıkla bu şartlar altında mümkün olmuştur. Anahtar Kelimeler: Ortaçağ, Anadolu, Yollar, Ticaret Middle Ages Anatolia Trade Routes Abstract The development of the trade roads passing through Anatolian Peninsula continued throughout the Middle Ages. This was a result of the stability considered important by the political powers aiming to guarantee the continuity of the trade and tax revenues. They also arranged military expeditions over and over again to protect their opportunities. The occurrence of the developed and detailed routes, the majority of which were connected with distant countries, had been possible mainly under these conditions. Keywords: Middle Ages, Anatolia, Roads, Trade Dâhilinde İpek yolunun yarımada güzergâhının da yer aldığı Anadolu ticaret yolları, Doğu Roma döneminden itibaren birbirini izleyen siyasî, ekonomik ve askerî gelişmelerin tesirinde kalmıştır. Bu durum hükümet merkezleri
    [Show full text]
  • The Sweep of History
    STUDENT’S World History & Geography 1 1 1 Essentials of World History to 1500 Ver. 3.1.10 – Rev. 2/1/2011 WHG1 The following pages describe significant people, places, events, and concepts in the story of humankind. This information forms the core of our study; it will be fleshed-out by classroom discussions, audio-visual mat erials, readings, writings, and other act ivit ies. This knowledge will help you understand how the world works and how humans behave. It will help you understand many of the books, news reports, films, articles, and events you will encounter throughout the rest of your life. The Student’s Friend World History & Geography 1 Essentials of world history to 1500 History What is history? History is the story of human experience. Why study history? History shows us how the world works and how humans behave. History helps us make judgments about current and future events. History affects our lives every day. History is a fascinating story of human treachery and achievement. Geography What is geography? Geography is the study of interaction between humans and the environment. Why study geography? Geography is a major factor affecting human development. Humans are a major factor affecting our natural environment. Geography affects our lives every day. Geography helps us better understand the peoples of the world. CONTENTS: Overview of history Page 1 Some basic concepts Page 2 Unit 1 - Origins of the Earth and Humans Page 3 Unit 2 - Civilization Arises in Mesopotamia & Egypt Page 5 Unit 3 - Civilization Spreads East to India & China Page 9 Unit 4 - Civilization Spreads West to Greece & Rome Page 13 Unit 5 - Early Middle Ages: 500 to 1000 AD Page 17 Unit 6 - Late Middle Ages: 1000 to 1500 AD Page 21 Copyright © 1998-2011 Michael G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Satrap of Western Anatolia and the Greeks
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Eyal Meyer University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation Meyer, Eyal, "The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2473. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Abstract This dissertation explores the extent to which Persian policies in the western satrapies originated from the provincial capitals in the Anatolian periphery rather than from the royal centers in the Persian heartland in the fifth ec ntury BC. I begin by establishing that the Persian administrative apparatus was a product of a grand reform initiated by Darius I, which was aimed at producing a more uniform and centralized administrative infrastructure. In the following chapter I show that the provincial administration was embedded with chancellors, scribes, secretaries and military personnel of royal status and that the satrapies were periodically inspected by the Persian King or his loyal agents, which allowed to central authorities to monitory the provinces. In chapter three I delineate the extent of satrapal authority, responsibility and resources, and conclude that the satraps were supplied with considerable resources which enabled to fulfill the duties of their office. After the power dynamic between the Great Persian King and his provincial governors and the nature of the office of satrap has been analyzed, I begin a diachronic scrutiny of Greco-Persian interactions in the fifth century BC.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Achaemenid Persia on Fourth-Century and Early Hellenistic Greek Tyranny
    THE INFLUENCE OF ACHAEMENID PERSIA ON FOURTH-CENTURY AND EARLY HELLENISTIC GREEK TYRANNY Miles Lester-Pearson A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2015 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/11826 This item is protected by original copyright The influence of Achaemenid Persia on fourth-century and early Hellenistic Greek tyranny Miles Lester-Pearson This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of St Andrews Submitted February 2015 1. Candidate’s declarations: I, Miles Lester-Pearson, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 88,000 words in length, has been written by me, and that it is the record of work carried out by me, or principally by myself in collaboration with others as acknowledged, and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student in September 2010 and as a candidate for the degree of PhD in September 2011; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between 2010 and 2015. Date: Signature of Candidate: 2. Supervisor’s declaration: I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of PhD in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Byzantine Missionaries, Foreign Rulers, and Christian Narratives (Ca
    Conversion and Empire: Byzantine Missionaries, Foreign Rulers, and Christian Narratives (ca. 300-900) by Alexander Borislavov Angelov A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) in The University of Michigan 2011 Doctoral Committee: Professor John V.A. Fine, Jr., Chair Professor Emeritus H. Don Cameron Professor Paul Christopher Johnson Professor Raymond H. Van Dam Associate Professor Diane Owen Hughes © Alexander Borislavov Angelov 2011 To my mother Irina with all my love and gratitude ii Acknowledgements To put in words deepest feelings of gratitude to so many people and for so many things is to reflect on various encounters and influences. In a sense, it is to sketch out a singular narrative but of many personal “conversions.” So now, being here, I am looking back, and it all seems so clear and obvious. But, it is the historian in me that realizes best the numerous situations, emotions, and dilemmas that brought me where I am. I feel so profoundly thankful for a journey that even I, obsessed with planning, could not have fully anticipated. In a final analysis, as my dissertation grew so did I, but neither could have become better without the presence of the people or the institutions that I feel so fortunate to be able to acknowledge here. At the University of Michigan, I first thank my mentor John Fine for his tremendous academic support over the years, for his friendship always present when most needed, and for best illustrating to me how true knowledge does in fact produce better humanity.
    [Show full text]
  • A Literary Sources
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-82860-4 — The Hellenistic World from Alexander to the Roman Conquest 2nd Edition Index More Information Index A Literary sources Livy XXVI.24.7–15: 77 (a); XXIX.12.11–16: 80; XXXI.44.2–9: 11 Aeschines III.132–4: 82; XXXIII.38: 195; XXXVII.40–1: Appian, Syrian Wars 52–5, 57–8, 62–3: 203; XXXVIII.34: 87; 57 XXXIX.24.1–4: 89; XLI.20: 209 (b); ‘Aristeas to Philocrates’ I.9–11 and XLII.29–30.7: 92; XLII.51: 94; 261 V.35–40: XLV.29.3–30 and 32.1–7: 96 15 [Aristotle] Oeconomica II.2.33: I Maccabees 1.1–9: 24; 1.10–25 and 5 7 Arrian, Alexander I.17: ; II.14: ; 41–56: 217; 15.1–9: 221 8 9 III.1.5–2.2: (a); III.3–4: ; II Maccabees 3.1–3: 216 12 13 IV.10.5–12.5: ; V.28–29.1: ; Memnon, FGrH 434 F 11 §§5.7–11: 159 14 20 V1.27.3–5: ; VII.1.1–4: ; Menander, The Sicyonian lines 3–15: 104 17 18 VII.4.4–5: ; VII.8–9 and 11: Menecles of Barca FGrHist 270F9:322 26 Arrian, FGrH 156 F 1, §§1–8: (a); F 9, Pausanias I.7: 254; I.9.4: 254; I.9.5–10: 30 §§34–8: 56; I.25.3–6: 28; VII.16.7–17.1: Athenaeus, Deipnosophistae V.201b–f, 100 258 43 202f–203e: ; VI.253b–f: Plutarch, Agis 5–6.1 and 7.5–8: 69 23 Augustine, City of God 4.4: Alexander 10.6–11: 3 (a); 15: 4 (a); Demetrius of Phalerum, FGrH 228 F 39: 26.3–10: 8 (b); 68.3: cf.
    [Show full text]