DOCSLIB.ORG

NO GÊNERO Frankliniella

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NO GÊNERO Frankliniella ESTUDOS TAXONÔMICOS DE TRIPES (THYSANOPTERA) CONSTATADOS NO BRASIL, COM ÊNFASE NO GÊNERO Frankliniella RENATA CHIARINIMONTEIRO EngenheiraAgrônoma Orientadores: Prof. Dr. ROBERTO A. ZUCCHI Co-orientador: Prof. Dr. LAURENCEA. MOUND Tese apresentada à Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", Universidade de São Paulo, para obtenção do titulo de Doutor em Ciências, Área de Concentração:Entomologia. PIRACICABA Estado de São Paulo - Brasil Novembro -1999 Dados Internacionais de catalogação na Publicação (CIP> DIVISÃO DE BIBLIOTECA E DOCUMENTAÇÃO - campus "Luiz de QueiroZ"/USP Monteiro, Renata Chiarini Estudos taxonômicos de tripes (Thysanoptera) constatados no Brasil, com ênfaseno gênero FrankliníellaI Renata Chiarini Monteiro. -- Piracicaba, 1999. p. Tese (doutorado) -- EscolaSuperior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, 1999. Bibliografia 1. Classificação (biologia) 2. inseto-nocivo 3. Praga agrícola 4. Tripes 1. Título CDD 632.731 11 A minha familia, pelas oportunidades, apoio, incentivo e carinho, OFEREÇO. Ao meu marido e filho, Fernando e Pedro, pelos sentimentos maislindos, com carinho, DEDIDO. 111 AGRADECIMENTOS Ao prof. Dr. Roberto A. Zucchi e ao Dr. Laurence A. Mound, pelos ensinamentos, orientação e incentivo. Ao Dr. Sueo Nakahara, pelos ensinamentos, constante participação e acompanhamento. Ao Dr. Charles L. Cole, pela disposição constante em ajudar, uso de laboratório e equipamentose amizade. Aos Drs. Robert A. Wharton e S. Bradley Vinson, pela uso de laboratório e equipamentos. Aos Drs. Richard zur Strassen, Tamotsu Murai e Akira Kawai, pelas informações e trabalhos. A todos os professores do Departamento de Entomologia, pelos ensinamentos e convivência. Aos colegas e funcionários do Departamento de Entomologia, pela convivência e amizade. As minhasamigas, em especial àArdabil, Cláudia e Patrícia, pelo incentivoe carinho. Ao CNPq, pela bolsa de estudos concedida. iv SUMÁRIO Página LISTA DE FIGURAS ................................................................................................................. vi RESUMO························································································································ ............. X SUMMARY............................................. .................................................................................... X 1. INTRODUÇÃO........... ..................................................... : ................................................... 1 2. REVISÃO DE LITERATlJRA........ ..................................................................................... 3 2.1. Considerações gerais .................................................................................................... 3 2.2. Importância.. .. ..... .. .. .... ....... ....... .. .. .. .. ... .... .. .. ..... .. ...... ... ........ ......... ....... .. .. .. ..... ...... ..... .. 4 2.3. Taxonomia .................................................................................................................... 4 3. LISTA DAS ESPÉCIES DE THYSANOPTERACONSTATADAS NO BRASIL ............ 6 Resumo .................................................................................................................................. 6 Summary......................................... ...................................................................................... 6 3.1. Introdução. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. ... ... ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 7 3.2. Materiale Métodos.................. ..................................................................................... 7 3.3. Resultados e Discussão ................................................................................................. 8 3 .3 .1. Lista de Terebrantia .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. ... .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. 9 3.3.2. Lista de Tubulifera .......................................................................................... 36 4. O GÊNERO Frankliniella NO BRASIL ........................................................................... 78 Resumo ................................................................................................................................ 78 Summary......................................... ..................................................................................... 78 4.1. Introdução............................... .................................................................. ; .................. 78 4.2. Material e Métodos ...................................................................................................... 80 4.3. Resultados e Discussão ................................................................................................ 81 4.3.1. · Frankliniella sp. n. ......................................................................................... 81 4.3.2. Chave de identificação das espécies de Frankliniella ................................... 84 4.3.3. Caracterizaçã morfológica das espécies de Frankliniella .............................. 90 5. O GÊNERO ThripsNO BRASIL............. ........................................................................ 112 Resumo ........................................................................................................... ; .................. 112 Summary........................................ .................................................................................... 112 5.1. Introdução................ .................................................................................................. 112 V 5.2. Materiale Métodos .................................................................................................... 113 5.3. Resultados e Discussão .............................................................................................. 113 5 .3.1. Chave de identificaçãodas espécies de Thrips.. .. .. ... .. .. .. ... .. .. .. ... .. ...... .... 114 5.3.2. Caracterizaçãomorfológica das espécies de Thrips........ ............................ 115 6. GÊNEROS DE P ANCHAETOTHRIPINAENO BRASIL .............................................. 117 Resumo .............................................................................................................................. 117 Summary.......................... .................................................................................................. 117 6.1. Introdução....... ........................................................................................................... 117 6.2. Materiale Métodos .................................................................................................... 118 6.3. Resultados e Discussão .............................................................................................. 118 6.3.1. Chave de identificaçãodos gêneros de Panchaetothripinae... ..................... 119 6.3.2. Caracterização morfológica dos gêneros de Panchaetothripinae ................. 120 ANEXOS ................................................................................................................................... 124 REFERÊNCIASBIBLIOGRÁFICAS ...................................................................................... 128 APÊNDICES ............................................................................................................................. 133 Vl LISTA DE FIGURAS E QUADRO PRANCHA FIGURAS PÁGINA I Figuras 1-14. Antena direita da � de Frankliniella spp. 1. F. annulipes; 2. F. bertelsi; 3. F. bondari; 4. F. brevicaulis; 5. F. brunnea; 6. F. condei; 1. F. desantisi; 8. F. distinguenda; 9. F. falvipennis; 10. F. falvipes; 11. F. gardenia; 12. F. gemina; 13. F. hemerocallis; 14. F. insularis. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. 98 II Figuras 15-27. Antena direita da � de Frankliniella spp. 15. F. longipennis; 16. F. longispinosa; 17. F. occidentalis; 18. F. oxyura; 19. F. peruviana; 20. F. rodeos; 21. F. schultzei; 22. F. simplex; 23. F. trinidadensis; 24. F. varipes; 25. F. williamsi; 26. F. zucchini; 27. Frankliniella sp. n. ................................................................................... 99 m Figuras 15-27. Antena direita da � de Frankliniella spp. 15. F. longipennis; 16. F. longispinosa; 17. F. occidentalis; 18. F. oxyura; 19. F. peruviana; 20. F. rodeos; 21. F. schultzei; 22. F. simplex; 23. F. trinidadensis; 24. F. varipes; 25. F. williamsi; 26. F. zucchini; 27. Frankliniella sp. n. ................................................................................... 100 IV Figuras 15-27. Cabeça (dorsal) da � de Frankliniella spp. 15. F. longipennis; 16. F. longispinosa; 17. F. occidentalis; 18. F. oxyura; 19. F. peruviana; 20. F. rodeos; 21. F. schultzei; 22. F. simplex; 23. F. trinidadensis; 24. F. varipes; 25. F. williamsi; 26. F. zucchini; 27. Frankliniella sp. n . ................................................................................... 101 V da � Figuras 1-6. Pronoto de Frankliniella spp. 1. F. annulipes; 2. F. bertelsi; 3. F. bondari; 4. F. brevicaulis; 5. F. brunnea; 6. F. condei. .... 102 VI Figuras 7-14. Pronoto da � de Frankliniella spp. 7. F. desantisi; 8. F. distinguenda; 9. F.falvipennis; 10. F.falvipes; 11. F. gardenia; 12. F. gemina; 13. F. hemerocallis; 14. F. insularis. .......................................... 103 Vll VII Figuras 15-22. Pronoto da !i! de Frankliniella spp. 15. F longipennis; 16. F longispinosa;
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evolution of the Insects David Grimaldi and Michael S
    Cambridge University Press 0521821495 - Evolution of the Insects David Grimaldi and Michael S. Engel Index More information INDEX 12S rDNA, 32, 228, 269 Aenetus, 557 91; general, 57; inclusions, 57; menageries 16S rDNA, 32, 60, 237, 249, 269 Aenigmatiinae, 536 in, 56; Mexican, 55; parasitism in, 57; 18S rDNA, 32, 60, 61, 158, 228, 274, 275, 285, Aenne, 489 preservation in, 58; resinite, 55; sub-fossil 304, 307, 335, 360, 366, 369, 395, 399, 402, Aeolothripidae, 284, 285, 286 resin, 57; symbioses in, 303; taphonomy, 468, 475 Aeshnoidea, 187 57 28S rDNA, 32, 158, 278, 402, 468, 475, 522, 526 African rock crawlers (see Ambermantis wozniaki, 259 Mantophasmatodea) Amblycera, 274, 278 A Afroclinocera, 630 Amblyoponini, 446, 490 aardvark, 638 Agaonidae, 573, 616: fossil, 423 Amblypygida, 99, 104, 105: in amber, 104 abdomen: function, 131; structure, 131–136 Agaoninae, 423 Amborella trichopoda, 613, 620 Abies, 410 Agassiz, Alexander, 26 Ameghinoia, 450, 632 Abrocomophagidae, 274 Agathiphaga, 560 Ameletopsidae, 628 Acacia, 283 Agathiphagidae, 561, 562, 567, 630 American Museum of Natural History, 26, 87, acalyptrate Diptera: ecological diversity, 540; Agathis, 76 91 taxonomy, 540 Agelaia, 439 Amesiginae, 630 Acanthocnemidae, 391 ages, using fossils, 37–39; using DNA, 38–40 ametaboly, 331 Acari, 99, 105–107: diversity, 101, fossils, 53, Ageniellini, 435 amino acids: racemization, 61 105–107; in-Cretaceous amber, 105, 106 Aglaspidida, 99 ammonites, 63, 642 Aceraceae, 413 Aglia, 582 Amorphoscelidae, 254, 257 Acerentomoidea, 113 Agrias, 600 Amphientomidae,
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of the Insects
    CY501-C08[261-330].qxd 2/15/05 11:10 PM Page 261 quark11 27B:CY501:Chapters:Chapter-08: 8 TheThe Paraneopteran Orders Paraneopteran The evolutionary history of the Paraneoptera – the bark lice, fold their wings rooflike at rest over the abdomen, but thrips true lice, thrips,Orders and hemipterans – is a history beautifully and Heteroptera fold them flat over the abdomen, which reflected in structure and function of their mouthparts. There probably relates to the structure of axillary sclerites and other is a general trend from the most generalized “picking” minute structures at the base of the wing (i.e., Yoshizawa and mouthparts of Psocoptera with standard insect mandibles, Saigusa, 2001). to the probing and puncturing mouthparts of thrips and Relationships among paraneopteran orders have been anopluran lice, and the distinctive piercing-sucking rostrum discussed by Seeger (1975, 1979), Kristensen (1975, 1991), or beak of the Hemiptera. Their mouthparts also reflect Hennig (1981), Wheeler et al. (2001), and most recently by diverse feeding habits (Figures 8.1, 8.2, Table 8.1). Basal Yoshizawa and Saigusa (2001). These studies generally agree paraneopterans – psocopterans and some basal thrips – are on the monophyly of the order Hemiptera and most of its microbial surface feeders. Thysanoptera and Hemiptera suborders and a close relationship of the true lice (order independently evolved a diet of plant fluids, but ancestral Phthiraptera) with the most basal group, the “bark lice” (Pso- heteropterans were, like basal living families, predatory coptera), which comprise the Psocodea. One major issue is insects that suction hemolymph and liquified tissues out of the position of thrips (order Thysanoptera), which either their prey.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics of Thysanoptera, Pear Thrips and Other Economic Species
    SYSTEMATICS OF THYSANOPTERA, PEAR THRIPS AND OTHER ECONOMIC SPECIES Sueo Nakahara Systematic Entomology Laboratory U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service Beltsville, Maryland USA Abstract The systematics of the Thysanoptera, and several economic species in the United States and Canada (North America) are discussed briefly. Morphological characters to distinguish the six families in North America and the following economic species, pear thrips (Taeniothrips inconsequens (Uzel)), basswood thrips (Thrips calcaratus Uzel), western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande)), flower thrips (Frankliniella tritici (Fitch)), tobacco thrips (Frankliniella fusca (Hinds)), and onion thrips (Thrips tabaci Lindeman) are discussed. Introduction The common name for the order Thysanoptera is thrips. Other common names that have been used are bladderfeet and woodlouse. There is also a genus Thrips, which is the oldest name in the order. In the United States and Canada (North America), there are about 700 described species of thrips. Mound & Houston (1987) estimate about 4,500 known species worldwide and probably another 4,500, mainly in the tropics, that have not been described. 42 Most thrips are tiny and barely visible. They usually are 1-2 mm long, the smallest are about 0.5 mm and the largest found in the tropics are about 14 mm (Lewis 1973). They are found in flowers and various parts of the plants, and often pupate or spend part of their life cycle in soil or ground litter. Thrips have elongate bodies, which are often slightly to strongly flatten dorso-ventrally (Figs. 1-2). Antennae are 4- to 9-segmented. The right mandible is vestigial and the left mandible is developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Chemical Insecticides and Neem Oil Hasina Mumutaj
    MANAGEMENT OF MUNGBEAN THRIPS (MEGALUROTHRIPS DISTALIS) USING CHEMICAL INSECTICIDES AND NEEM OIL HASINA MUMUTAJ DEPARTMENT OF ENTOMOLOGY SHER-E-BANGLA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY SHER-E-BANGLA NAGAR, DHAKA DECEMBER, 2014 MANAGEMENT OF MUNGBEAN THRIPS (MEGALUROTHRIPS DISTALIS) USING CHEMICAL INSECTICIDES AND NEEM OIL By HASINA MUMUTAJ REGISTRATION NO. 08-2669 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Agriculture, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka, in Partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ENTOMOLOGY SEMESTER: JULY - DECEMBER, 2014 Approved by (Prof. Dr. Md. Abdul Latif) (Prof. Dr. Md. Razzab Ali) Supervisor Co-Supervisor (Dr. Mohammed Shakhawat Hossain) Chairman Examination Committee CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the thesis entitled, “MANAGEMENT OF MUNGBEAN THRIPS (MEGALUROTHRIPS DISTALIS) USING CHEMICAL INSECTICIDES AND NEEM OIL” submitted to the Faculty of Agriculture, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ENTOMOLOGY, embodies the result of a piece of bona fide research work carried out by HASINA MUMUTAJ, Registration No. 08-2669 under my supervision and guidance. No part of the thesis has been submitted for any other degree or diploma. I further certify that such help or source of information, as has been availed of during the course of this investigation has duly been acknowledged. Dated: December, 2014 (Prof. Dr. Md. Abdul Latif) Dhaka, Bangladesh Supervisor DEDICATED TO MY BELOVED PARENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS All praises and thanks are due to the Supreme Ruler of the Universe, the Almighty Allah for His grace bestowed upon the author for accomplishment of this research study.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Introduction
    INTRODUCTION 1 1. Introduction The order Thysanoptera (common name: thrips) encompasses minute insects which are usually only a few millimeters long. The majority of the species has fringed, banded wings as well as asymmetrical sucking and piercing mouthparts (only the left-hand side mandible is developed) (HEMING 1978; MOUND et al. 1980; MORITZ 1989b, 1997). Thrips also have a protrusible sac-like arolium at the apex of each leg (HEMING 1971; MOUND et al. 1980; MORITZ 1989c). These insects were first described by DE GEER in 1744 (Physapus), later LINNEAUS placed the species which were known at this time in a genus called Thrips, and in 1836 HALIDAY ranked these insects to the Thysanoptera order. Thysanoptera are distributed worldwide predominating in tropical, subtropical, and temperate regions (LEWIS 1973, 1997). Currently about 5500 thrips species are described (10000 species estimated) (LEWIS 1997; MOUND 1997). Within Thysanoptera there are two suborders, Terebrantia and Tubulifera. Females of the Terebrantia possess an external ovipositor composed of four valves (HEMING 1970a; BODE 1975; MORITZ 1989d, 1997). In the tubuliferan species the ovipositor displays a flexible internal structure which is evertable (HEMING 1970a; MORITZ 1997). There are nine families within the Thysanoptera (MORITZ et al. 2001). Eight of these (Uzelothripidae, Merothripidae, Aeolothripidae, Melanthripidae, Adiheterothripidae, Fauriellidae, Heterothripidae, and Thripidae) belong to the Terebrantia. The suborder of Tubulifera includes only a single family, the Phlaeothripidae (MOUND 1997). 93 per cent of all known thrips species are placed in either the Thripidae or Phlaeothripidae (MOUND 1997) and of these two major families the Phlaeothripidae is the largest with about 3100 currently described species (MOUND et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Check List and Authors Chec List Open Access | Freely Available at Journal of Species Lists and Distribution Pecies S
    ISSN 1809-127X (online edition) © 2011 Check List and Authors Chec List Open Access | Freely available at www.checklist.org.br Journal of species lists and distribution PECIES S OF MajidThrips Mirab-balou (Insecta: 1, Xiao-li TongThysanoptera) 2, Ji-nian Feng 3 and Xue-xin of China Chen 1* ISTS L 1 Institute of Insect Sciences, zhejiang University, 268 Kaixuan Road, Hangzhou 310029, China. 2 South China Agricultural University, Department of Entomology. Guangzhou 510642, China. 3 Northwest A. and F. University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China. [email protected] * Corresponding author. E-mail: Abstract: A new checklist of Thysanoptera from China (including Taiwan) is provided. In total 566 species in 155 genera are listed, of which there are 313 species in the suborder Terebrantia, comprising 290 species in 74 genera in family Thripidae, 18 species in three genera in Aeolothripidae, two species in one genus in Melanthripidae and three species in one genus in Merothripidae. In the suborder Tubulifera 253 species in 76 genera are listed in the single family Phlaeothripidae. Two species, Aeolothrips collaris and Odontothrips meliloti, are newly recorded for the fauna of China. Introduction and Forestry University (Yangling, Shaanxi prov.), Jun About 6000 species of Thysanoptera are known Wang and associates (2006-2011, 7 publications) at Jilin University (Jilin prov.), Xue-xin Chen and associates (2010- Terebrantia and Tubulifera, comprising eight families 2011, 6 publications) at Zhejiang University, Hangzhou (Bhattifrom the 1979a world.1, dealing These arewith classified both living into and two fossil suborders forms; (Zhejiang prov.), and Chin-Lin Wang (1993–2010, 19 Mound et al.
    [Show full text]
  • (Insecta, Thysanoptera) in a Semi-Arid Region of Brazil
    Chromosomal diversity and phylogenetic inferences concerning thrips (Insecta, Thysanoptera) in a semi-arid region of Brazil R.O. Brito, P.R.A.M. Affonso and J.C. Silva Jr. Laboratório de Citogenética, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Jequié, BA, Brasil Corresponding author: J.C. Silva Jr. E-mail: [email protected] Genet. Mol. Res. 9 (4): 2230-2238 (2010) Received May 8, 2010 Accepted July 9, 2010 Published November 16, 2010 DOI 10.4238/vol9-4gmr843 ABSTRACT. The order Thysanoptera is composed of cosmopolitan phytophagous and predaceous insects with diverse life histories, behaviors and habits. This order is currently thought to form a trichotomy with Hemiptera and Psocodea; Hemiptera and Thysanoptera are considered to be sister groups. The interrelationships within Thysanoptera remain unclear and cytotaxonomic studies are scarce in thrips. We report, for the first time, chromosomal data on seven species of thrips collected from a semi-arid region in the States of Bahia and Pernambuco (Northeast Brazil). A distinctive chromosomal pattern was observed in Thysanoptera when compared to other members within the infraclass Paraneoptera. Considerable karyotypic differences were also found within genera and species of Thysanoptera. Based on these data, we suggest that Paraneoptera forms a polyphyletic group and that Terebrantia and Tubulifera should be regarded as sister groups. The high chromosomal variability observed in Thysanoptera indicates that chromosomal rearrangements have played a key role in their speciation pathways. Key words: Cytotaxonomy; Chromosomal evolution; Thysanoptera; Paraneoptera Genetics and Molecular Research 9 (4): 2230-2238 (2010) ©FUNPEC-RP www.funpecrp.com.br Cytogenetics of thrips 2231 INTRODUCTION The order Thysanoptera mainly comprises phytophagous and tiny insects (0.5 to 15 mm in length) of elongated body that feed on fungi and leaves, which are popularly known as thrips (Mound and Marullo, 1996; Mound, 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 I1 I4 I5 I2 I3
    Figure S1. (A) Semi-arid Mediterranean steppes in the study area, Cabezo de la Plata, Murcia, Spain. (B) Detailed view of the steppe landscape in the study area, with a mosaic of vegetation patches dominated by the tussock grass Stipa tenacissima, L., and bare-soil inter-patches. I1 P4 I4 P1 diameter I3 P3 P2 distances I5 I2 P5 Figure S2. Schematic illustration of a sampling plot (~400 m2), with vegetation patches (green patches) on a bare-soil matrix. Each letter followed by a number (red labels) represents a soil-fauna sampling point, with sampling patches represented as P1…P5, and sampling interpatches represented as I1…I5. For each sampling point, the distance to each of the four nearest neighbor patches was measured. Patch size was measured as patch diameter (cm). Figure S3. Relative abundance of ground arthropods taxa found in semi-arid Mediterranean steppe areas in Southeast Spain. Figure S4. Abundance (A) and species richness (R) of ground arthropods found in interpatches (I) and patches (P) as a function of the average distance (D) to the four nearest neighbor patches in semi-arid Mediterranean steppe areas in Southeast Spain. Dashed lines are exponential fits. Table S1. List of taxa and number of morpho-species found in the litter and top-soil layers of fourteen plots of Mediterranean steppe areas in Southeast Spain. Indet Superf—Indeterminate Superfamily; Indet Fam: Indeterminate Family; Indet Genera: Indeterminate Genera; All Lepidoptera and most of Diptera are immatures. Number List of taxa of morphospecies Class Arachnida
    [Show full text]
  • Thrips in the Neotropics: What Do We Know So Far?
    Trends in Entomology Vol. 6, 2010 Thrips in the Neotropics: What do we know so far? Estevão Alves-Silva and Kleber Del-Claro* Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação dos Recursos Naturais, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Instituto de Biologia, Rua Ceará, s/nº Bloco 2D – Campus Umuarama, Zip code: 38400902, Post Office Box: 593, Uberlândia, MG, Brasil ABSTRACT the current knowledge on thrips habits and Thrips are among the most diverse insects in the habitats in the Neotropics. We also aim to shed light and provide an insightful assessment on planet, however their diversity and interactions in Neotropics are not well known. Most studies in the ecology and behavior of these long ignored this region regard the Brazilian and Argentine insects in one of the most biologically diverse thysanopterofauna and treat species as crop pests ecozones in the world. either by the severe herbivory on plants and by KEYWORDS: Thysanoptera, diversity, ecology, the transmission of virus resulting in serious damage and economic losses. Nevertheless thrips interactions, tropical present unique and extraordinary interactions and Current knowledge of Thysanoptera in the occur in virtually any microhabitat, such as Neotropics flowers, leaves and fruits. These insects may feed Since the claims of Laurence Mound in the on fungus, flower tissues and also on other arthropods, influencing food chains and bottom- beginning of this century [1], pointing out that it up and top-down forces in trophic cascades. In was urgent and necessary the graduation of addition to these widely disparate feeding habits, researchers interested on the study of Neotropical thrips, much progress was done.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa,The Insect Order Thysanoptera
    Zootaxa 1668: 395–411 (2007) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2007 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) The insect Order Thysanoptera: Classification versus Systematics* LAURENCE A. MOUND1 & DAVID C. MORRIS2 1Honorary Research Fellow, CSIRO Entomology, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia 2Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Botany and Zoology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia *In: Zhang, Z.-Q. & Shear, W.A. (Eds) (2007) Linnaeus Tercentenary: Progress in Invertebrate Taxonomy. Zootaxa, 1668, 1–766. Table of contents Abstract . 395 Introduction . 396 Order, Superorder or Suborder . 396 Sub-ordinal classification of Thysanoptera . 397 Supra-generic classification of Tubulifera . 398 Phlaeothripinae classification by Priesner . 399 Phlaeothripinae classification by Bhatti . 400 Phlaeothripinae classification by Stannard . 401 Supra-generic classification of Terebrantia . 402 Lower families of Terebrantia . 402 Relationships within Aeolothripidae . 403 Intermediate families of Terebrantia . 404 Relationships within Thripidae . 405 Considerations from molecular data . 406 Acknowledgements 410 References . 410 Abstract Two widely different classifications of the insect order Thysanoptera are discussed; an essentially phylogenetic system recognizing nine families in two suborders, and an essentially phenetic system recognizing 40 families in two orders. This paper emphasizes the distinction between “classification” and “systematics”, the former stressing the importance
    [Show full text]
  • The Alarm Pheromone of the Western Flower Thrips
    The alarm pheromone of the western flower thrips1 Chapter 1 General introduction _________________________________________________________________________ 1.1 The western flower thrips Thrips are small, slender, usually winged, insects belonging to the order Thysanoptera, which is composed of two sub-orders, the Terebrantia and the Tubulifera. The seven families of the Terebrantia, the Uzelothripidae, Merothripidae, Aeolothripidae, Adiheterothripidae, Fauriellidae, Heterothripidae and Thripidae, account for approximately 2065 of the 5000 or so species in this order (Mound, 1997). The remaining 3100 species belong to the single Tubuliferan family Phlaeothripidae. The majority of species are phytophagous and some of these are serious pests of protected crops, whilst a few species are mycophagous or predatory in their feeding habits. Pest species occur in the four subfamilies of the Thripidae (the Thripinae, Panchaetothripinae, Dendrothripinae and Sericothripinae) and in phlaeothripid subfamily Phlaeothripinae. Since the mid 1980’s the western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande), a highly polyphagous species, has spread from its native western USA to a worldwide distribution. This species is currently a major pest of both horticultural and floricultural protected crops in the UK. Cucumbers and chrysanthemums are particularly affected. 1 The alarm pheromone of the western flower thrips1 1.2 Biology In common with the majority of Terebrantia, the F. occidentalis life cycle has six developmental stages: the egg, two feeding larval stages, two non-feeding pupal stages and the adult stage (Bryan & Smith, 1956; Lewis, 1973). The development of thrips is neither truly holometabolic or hemimetabolic. Although the appearance of larval stages closely resembles the adults, suggesting hemimetabolic development, the pupal stages undergo major internal reorganisation, which is typical of holometabolic development.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Review - Arthropod Fauna of the United Arab Emirates 255
    GIŁKA W.: Book review - Arthropod fauna of the United Arab Emirates 255 BOOK REVIEW H.H. Sheikh Tahnoon Bin Zayed Al Nahyan (patron), Antonius van Harten (editor). Arthropod fauna of the United Arab Emirates . Volume 1. Dar Al Ummah Printing, Publishing & Advertising, 2008. 754 pages, 17 x 24 cm. ISBN 978-9948-03-642-5. Price: 35 € (incl. postage). In 2004, on the initiative of His Highness Sheikh Tahnoon Bin Zayed Al Nahyan of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), a comprehensive programme aimed at producing an inventory of the UAE arthropod fauna was commenced. The idea underlying the programme was to study biological diversity of a poorly known area exposed to rapidly progressing urbanization and environmental degradation. The programme is coordinated by Antonius van Harten who managed to involve more than 150 experts from all over the world. The programme is envisaged to produce a series of reports the first volume of which, “Arthropod fauna of the United Arab Emirates. Volume 1” came out in January 2008. The book is intended for both professional and amateur entomologist. The volume consists of groups of chapters: the first group provides general information and includes Preface , Introduction , and a description of Collecting methods and localities , while the second group deals with systematics and is divided into parts entitled Mites and Insects of the UAE , List of taxonomic novelties in this volume and Zoological index . Each of the 56 chapters of the systematics group provides the most important information on biology, knowledge of the taxon dealt with and a review of species recorded in the UAE.
    [Show full text]