Thrips in the Neotropics: What Do We Know So Far?
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Departament De Biologia Funcional I Antropologia Física
DEPARTAMENT DE BIOLOGIA FUNCIONAL I ANTROPOLOGIA FÍSICA EVALUACIÓN DE MECANISMOS DE RESISTENCIA A INSECTICIDAS EN FRANKLINIELLA OCCIDENTALIS (PERGANDE): IMPLICACIÓN DE CARBOXILESTERASAS Y ACETILCOLINESTERASAS NEUS LÓPEZ SOLER UNIVERSITAT DE VALÈNCIA Servei de Publicacions 2008 Aquesta Tesi Doctoral va ser presentada a València el dia 26 de juny de 2008 davant un tribunal format per: - D. Rafael Martínez Pardo - D. Félix Ortego Alonso - D. Juan Ferré Manzanero - D. Francisco José Beitia Crespo - D. Juan Javier Díaz Mayans Va ser dirigida per: Dª. Mª Dolores Garcerá Zamorano Dª. Amelia Cervera Olagüe ©Copyright: Servei de Publicacions Neus López Soler Depòsit legal: I.S.B.N.: 978-84-370-7227-2 Edita: Universitat de València Servei de Publicacions C/ Artes Gráficas, 13 bajo 46010 València Spain Telèfon: 963864115 Facultat de Ciències Biològiques Departament de Biologia Funcional i Antropologia Física Evaluación de mecanismos de resistencia a insecticidas en Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande): implicación de carboxilesterasas y acetilcolinesterasas Neus López Soler Burjassot, València 2008 i Tesis presentada por Neus López Soler para optar al grado de Doctor en Ciencias Biológicas por la Universitat de València. Fdo. Neus López Soler Tesis dirigida por: Mª Dolores Garcerá Zamorano, Doctora en Ciencias Biológicas y Catedrática de Fisiología de la Universitat de València. Amelia Cervera Olagüe, Doctora en Ciencias Biológicas. Fdo. Mª Dolores Garcerá Zamorano Fdo. Amelia Cervera Olagüe La investigación presentada en esta Tesis se realizó en la Unidad de Fisiología Animal del Departament de Biologia Funcional i Antropologia Física de la Facultat de Ciències Biològiques de la Universitat de València, gracias al disfrute de una Beca del Programa Nacional de Formación de Profesorado Universitario (FPU) del Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia. -
Thysanoptera: Aeolothripidae)
Zootaxa 4683 (3): 447–450 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Correspondence ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2019 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4683.3.9 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3CA08D86-8574-446F-8FC9-7B6BADBDBCA3 Reduced antennal segmentation in a new species from Iran of the genus Aeolothrips (Thysanoptera: Aeolothripidae) KAMBIZ MINAEI1 & LAURENCE MOUND2 1Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. E-mail: [email protected] 2CSIRO Australian national Insect Collection, Canberra, ACT, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] The number of antennal segments in adults of the different families and genera in the insect order Thysanoptera varies between five and nine. The plesiotypic number is considered to be nine (Zhang et al. 2019), and fossil thrips reported to have 10 to 15 segments (Tong et al. 2019) are generally considered to be aberrations in which the terminal segment bears transverse striae. The 9-segmented condition occurs particularly amongst species that exhibit several other characters in a plesiomorphic state, including all Melanthripidae, two genera of Merothripidae, also most species of Fauriellidae, Stenu- rothripidae, Heterothripidae, and Aeolothripidae (Mound et al. 1980). Curiously, members of a few genera of Thripidae (Palmer & Mound 1985; Minaei 2012) also have nine antennal segments, but this is considered a reversion from the 8- segmented condition that is assumed to be plesiomorphic for that family (Zhang et al. 2019). Variation between eight and nine segments occurs in the genus Anaphothrips, and within that genus a few species exhibit intraspecific variation in an- tennal segmentation (Mound & Masumoto 2009). -
Heterothripidae Australian Fauna No Member of This Family Is Known from Australia
Index | Glossary A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Heterothripidae Australian fauna No member of this Family is known from Australia. Biology Of the 90 species currently listed in this family, all but the five Aulacothrips species are considered to be phytophagous. They feed and breed in flowers, presumably exhibiting a high Heterothrips arisaemae, female Heterothrips arisaemae, antenna level of host specificity (Mound & Marullo, 1996), and pupate in a silken cocoon at soil level. Aulacothrips species breed on, and pupate on, the tergites of particular Homoptera, feeding as ectoparasites on these bugs (Izzo et al., 2002; Cavalleri & Kaminski, 2014). Geographic distribution Heterothrips arisaemae, antennal Aulacothrips dictyotus, antennal segments III-IV segments IV-IX Members of this family are known only from the Americas, and keys to many species are provided by Mound & Marullo (1996), and Pereyra & Cavalleri (2012). Species of Heterothrips have been described between New York and Illinois in the North and Argentina in the South, whereas the species of the other three genera are known only from the Neotropics. Heterothrips arisaemae, wings Recognition Heterothrips arisaemae, head & pronotum Species of Heterothripidae all have nine antennal segments, the distal segments being more or less distinct from each other, and the sensoria on segments III and IV form a continuous band. In most species this sensorium is only around the segment apex, but in Lenkothrips it extends as a loop to the midpoint of both segments, and in Aulacothrips it is looped and highly convoluted Heterothrips arisaemae, Heterothrips arisaemae, tergites I- (Cavalleri & Kaminski, 2014). -
Thysanoptera, Aeolothripidae) from Iran
© Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Linzer biol. Beitr. 46/1 637-642 31.7.2014 New record of predatory thrips, Aeolothrips melaleucus (Thysanoptera, Aeolothripidae) from Iran K. MINAEI Abstract: A predatory species, Aeolothrips melaleucus (HALIDAY) is recorded on the base of materials collected on apple and bean caper leaves in Fars Province, south of Iran. The species is very similar to another predatory thrips Aeolothrips versicolor UZEL in forewing in which posterior margin of forewing is dark except at base and apex in both species. The characters on which these two species are separated together with illustrations are provided and predatory habitat of A. melaleucus is discussed briefly. Key words: Aeolothrips, biology, Fars Province, predator. Introduction Most members of the insects, order Thysanoptera or thrips are phytophagous on living plants or mycophagous on dead branches and in leaf litter (MOUND 1997). However a widespread behavioral attribute amongst these tiny insects has been demonstrated. Some thrips play role as pollinators (LEWIS 1973), some induce gall (CRESPI et al. 2004) and a few have been recorded as obligate predator (PALMER & MOUND 1991). Moreover, larvae and adults of species in the genus Aulacothrips (Heterothripidae) have become ectoparasite on some members of insect order Hemiptera in Brazil (CAVALLERI et al. 2010, 2012). More recently CAVALLERI et al. (2013) reported a novel interaction between a phlaeothripd (family Phlaeothripidae) species, Mirothrips arbiter, and three species of social paper wasps, the genus Polistes (Vespidae). This thrips species breeds inside the wasp colonies, and larval and adult thrips feed on wasp eggs, which become severely damaged. -
ON Frankliniella Occidentalis (Pergande) and Frankliniella Bispinosa (Morgan) in SWEET PEPPER
DIFFERENTIAL PREDATION BY Orius insidiosus (Say) ON Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) AND Frankliniella bispinosa (Morgan) IN SWEET PEPPER By SCOT MICHAEL WARING A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2005 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank my Mom for getting me interested in what nature has to offer: birds, rats, snakes, bugs and fishing; she influenced me far more than anyone else to get me where I am today. I thank my Dad for his relentless support and concern. I thank my son, Sequoya, for his constant inspiration and patience uncommon for a boy his age. I thank my wife, Anna, for her endless supply of energy and love. I thank my grandmother, Mimi, for all of her love, support and encouragement. I thank Joe Funderburk and Stuart Reitz for continuing to support and encourage me in my most difficult times. I thank Debbie Hall for guiding me and watching over me during my effort to bring this thesis to life. I thank Heather McAuslane for her generous lab support, use of her greenhouse and superior editing abilities. I thank Shane Hill for sharing his love of entomology and for being such a good friend. I thank Tim Forrest for introducing me to entomology. I thank Jim Nation and Grover Smart for their help navigating graduate school and the academics therein. I thank Byron Adams for generous use of his greenhouse and camera. I also thank (in no particular order) Aaron Weed, Jim Dunford, Katie Barbara, Erin Britton, Erin Gentry, Aissa Doumboya, Alison Neeley, Matthew Brightman, Scotty Long, Wade Davidson, Kelly Sims (Latsha), Jodi Avila, Matt Aubuchon, Emily Heffernan, Heather Smith, David Serrano, Susana Carrasco, Alejandro Arevalo and all of the other graduate students that kept me going and inspired about the work we have been doing. -
Evolution of the Insects David Grimaldi and Michael S
Cambridge University Press 0521821495 - Evolution of the Insects David Grimaldi and Michael S. Engel Index More information INDEX 12S rDNA, 32, 228, 269 Aenetus, 557 91; general, 57; inclusions, 57; menageries 16S rDNA, 32, 60, 237, 249, 269 Aenigmatiinae, 536 in, 56; Mexican, 55; parasitism in, 57; 18S rDNA, 32, 60, 61, 158, 228, 274, 275, 285, Aenne, 489 preservation in, 58; resinite, 55; sub-fossil 304, 307, 335, 360, 366, 369, 395, 399, 402, Aeolothripidae, 284, 285, 286 resin, 57; symbioses in, 303; taphonomy, 468, 475 Aeshnoidea, 187 57 28S rDNA, 32, 158, 278, 402, 468, 475, 522, 526 African rock crawlers (see Ambermantis wozniaki, 259 Mantophasmatodea) Amblycera, 274, 278 A Afroclinocera, 630 Amblyoponini, 446, 490 aardvark, 638 Agaonidae, 573, 616: fossil, 423 Amblypygida, 99, 104, 105: in amber, 104 abdomen: function, 131; structure, 131–136 Agaoninae, 423 Amborella trichopoda, 613, 620 Abies, 410 Agassiz, Alexander, 26 Ameghinoia, 450, 632 Abrocomophagidae, 274 Agathiphaga, 560 Ameletopsidae, 628 Acacia, 283 Agathiphagidae, 561, 562, 567, 630 American Museum of Natural History, 26, 87, acalyptrate Diptera: ecological diversity, 540; Agathis, 76 91 taxonomy, 540 Agelaia, 439 Amesiginae, 630 Acanthocnemidae, 391 ages, using fossils, 37–39; using DNA, 38–40 ametaboly, 331 Acari, 99, 105–107: diversity, 101, fossils, 53, Ageniellini, 435 amino acids: racemization, 61 105–107; in-Cretaceous amber, 105, 106 Aglaspidida, 99 ammonites, 63, 642 Aceraceae, 413 Aglia, 582 Amorphoscelidae, 254, 257 Acerentomoidea, 113 Agrias, 600 Amphientomidae, -
Thrips of California
BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY VOLUME 4, NO. 5 THE THRIPS OF CALIFORNIA PART I: SUBORDER TEREBRANTIA BY STANLEY F. BAILEY (Department of Entomology and Parasitology, University’ of California, Davis) UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES 1957 BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY Editors: E. G. Linsley, S. B. Freeborn, P. D. Hurd, R. L. Usinger Volume 4, No. 5, pp. 143-220, plates 17-23 Submitted by Editors, March 28, 1956 Issued April 12, 1957 Price $1.50 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON. ENGLAND PRINTED BY OFFSET IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................................... 143 Methods and Materials for the Collection of Thrips ........................................ 143 Bionomics ........................................................................... 145 Distribution ......................................................................... 145 Systematics ............................................................................ 146 Key to the Genera of California Thysanoptera: Terebrantia ................................. 147 Aeolothrips ........................................................................ 151 Anaphothrips ...................................................................... 159 Ankothrips ........................................................................ 163 Aptinothrips ...................................................................... -
Evolution of the Insects
CY501-C08[261-330].qxd 2/15/05 11:10 PM Page 261 quark11 27B:CY501:Chapters:Chapter-08: 8 TheThe Paraneopteran Orders Paraneopteran The evolutionary history of the Paraneoptera – the bark lice, fold their wings rooflike at rest over the abdomen, but thrips true lice, thrips,Orders and hemipterans – is a history beautifully and Heteroptera fold them flat over the abdomen, which reflected in structure and function of their mouthparts. There probably relates to the structure of axillary sclerites and other is a general trend from the most generalized “picking” minute structures at the base of the wing (i.e., Yoshizawa and mouthparts of Psocoptera with standard insect mandibles, Saigusa, 2001). to the probing and puncturing mouthparts of thrips and Relationships among paraneopteran orders have been anopluran lice, and the distinctive piercing-sucking rostrum discussed by Seeger (1975, 1979), Kristensen (1975, 1991), or beak of the Hemiptera. Their mouthparts also reflect Hennig (1981), Wheeler et al. (2001), and most recently by diverse feeding habits (Figures 8.1, 8.2, Table 8.1). Basal Yoshizawa and Saigusa (2001). These studies generally agree paraneopterans – psocopterans and some basal thrips – are on the monophyly of the order Hemiptera and most of its microbial surface feeders. Thysanoptera and Hemiptera suborders and a close relationship of the true lice (order independently evolved a diet of plant fluids, but ancestral Phthiraptera) with the most basal group, the “bark lice” (Pso- heteropterans were, like basal living families, predatory coptera), which comprise the Psocodea. One major issue is insects that suction hemolymph and liquified tissues out of the position of thrips (order Thysanoptera), which either their prey. -
Systematics of Thysanoptera, Pear Thrips and Other Economic Species
SYSTEMATICS OF THYSANOPTERA, PEAR THRIPS AND OTHER ECONOMIC SPECIES Sueo Nakahara Systematic Entomology Laboratory U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service Beltsville, Maryland USA Abstract The systematics of the Thysanoptera, and several economic species in the United States and Canada (North America) are discussed briefly. Morphological characters to distinguish the six families in North America and the following economic species, pear thrips (Taeniothrips inconsequens (Uzel)), basswood thrips (Thrips calcaratus Uzel), western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande)), flower thrips (Frankliniella tritici (Fitch)), tobacco thrips (Frankliniella fusca (Hinds)), and onion thrips (Thrips tabaci Lindeman) are discussed. Introduction The common name for the order Thysanoptera is thrips. Other common names that have been used are bladderfeet and woodlouse. There is also a genus Thrips, which is the oldest name in the order. In the United States and Canada (North America), there are about 700 described species of thrips. Mound & Houston (1987) estimate about 4,500 known species worldwide and probably another 4,500, mainly in the tropics, that have not been described. 42 Most thrips are tiny and barely visible. They usually are 1-2 mm long, the smallest are about 0.5 mm and the largest found in the tropics are about 14 mm (Lewis 1973). They are found in flowers and various parts of the plants, and often pupate or spend part of their life cycle in soil or ground litter. Thrips have elongate bodies, which are often slightly to strongly flatten dorso-ventrally (Figs. 1-2). Antennae are 4- to 9-segmented. The right mandible is vestigial and the left mandible is developed. -
NO GÊNERO Frankliniella
ESTUDOS TAXONÔMICOS DE TRIPES (THYSANOPTERA) CONSTATADOS NO BRASIL, COM ÊNFASE NO GÊNERO Frankliniella RENATA CHIARINIMONTEIRO EngenheiraAgrônoma Orientadores: Prof. Dr. ROBERTO A. ZUCCHI Co-orientador: Prof. Dr. LAURENCEA. MOUND Tese apresentada à Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", Universidade de São Paulo, para obtenção do titulo de Doutor em Ciências, Área de Concentração:Entomologia. PIRACICABA Estado de São Paulo - Brasil Novembro -1999 Dados Internacionais de catalogação na Publicação (CIP> DIVISÃO DE BIBLIOTECA E DOCUMENTAÇÃO - campus "Luiz de QueiroZ"/USP Monteiro, Renata Chiarini Estudos taxonômicos de tripes (Thysanoptera) constatados no Brasil, com ênfaseno gênero FrankliníellaI Renata Chiarini Monteiro. -- Piracicaba, 1999. p. Tese (doutorado) -- EscolaSuperior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, 1999. Bibliografia 1. Classificação (biologia) 2. inseto-nocivo 3. Praga agrícola 4. Tripes 1. Título CDD 632.731 11 A minha familia, pelas oportunidades, apoio, incentivo e carinho, OFEREÇO. Ao meu marido e filho, Fernando e Pedro, pelos sentimentos maislindos, com carinho, DEDIDO. 111 AGRADECIMENTOS Ao prof. Dr. Roberto A. Zucchi e ao Dr. Laurence A. Mound, pelos ensinamentos, orientação e incentivo. Ao Dr. Sueo Nakahara, pelos ensinamentos, constante participação e acompanhamento. Ao Dr. Charles L. Cole, pela disposição constante em ajudar, uso de laboratório e equipamentose amizade. Aos Drs. Robert A. Wharton e S. Bradley Vinson, pela uso de laboratório e equipamentos. Aos Drs. Richard zur Strassen, Tamotsu Murai e Akira Kawai, pelas informações e trabalhos. A todos os professores do Departamento de Entomologia, pelos ensinamentos e convivência. Aos colegas e funcionários do Departamento de Entomologia, pela convivência e amizade. As minhasamigas, em especial àArdabil, Cláudia e Patrícia, pelo incentivoe carinho. -
Using Chemical Insecticides and Neem Oil Hasina Mumutaj
MANAGEMENT OF MUNGBEAN THRIPS (MEGALUROTHRIPS DISTALIS) USING CHEMICAL INSECTICIDES AND NEEM OIL HASINA MUMUTAJ DEPARTMENT OF ENTOMOLOGY SHER-E-BANGLA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY SHER-E-BANGLA NAGAR, DHAKA DECEMBER, 2014 MANAGEMENT OF MUNGBEAN THRIPS (MEGALUROTHRIPS DISTALIS) USING CHEMICAL INSECTICIDES AND NEEM OIL By HASINA MUMUTAJ REGISTRATION NO. 08-2669 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Agriculture, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka, in Partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ENTOMOLOGY SEMESTER: JULY - DECEMBER, 2014 Approved by (Prof. Dr. Md. Abdul Latif) (Prof. Dr. Md. Razzab Ali) Supervisor Co-Supervisor (Dr. Mohammed Shakhawat Hossain) Chairman Examination Committee CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the thesis entitled, “MANAGEMENT OF MUNGBEAN THRIPS (MEGALUROTHRIPS DISTALIS) USING CHEMICAL INSECTICIDES AND NEEM OIL” submitted to the Faculty of Agriculture, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ENTOMOLOGY, embodies the result of a piece of bona fide research work carried out by HASINA MUMUTAJ, Registration No. 08-2669 under my supervision and guidance. No part of the thesis has been submitted for any other degree or diploma. I further certify that such help or source of information, as has been availed of during the course of this investigation has duly been acknowledged. Dated: December, 2014 (Prof. Dr. Md. Abdul Latif) Dhaka, Bangladesh Supervisor DEDICATED TO MY BELOVED PARENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS All praises and thanks are due to the Supreme Ruler of the Universe, the Almighty Allah for His grace bestowed upon the author for accomplishment of this research study. -
Plant-Arthropod Interactions: a Behavioral Approach
Psyche Plant-Arthropod Interactions: A Behavioral Approach Guest Editors: Kleber Del-Claro, Monique Johnson, and Helena Maura Torezan-Silingardi Plant-Arthropod Interactions: A Behavioral Approach Psyche Plant-Arthropod Interactions: A Behavioral Approach Guest Editors: Kleber Del-Claro, Monique Johnson, and Helena Maura Torezan-Silingardi Copyright © 2012 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. All rights reserved. This is a special issue published in “Psyche.” All articles are open access articles distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Editorial Board Toshiharu Akino, Japan Lawrence G. Harshman, USA Lynn M. Riddiford, USA Sandra Allan, USA Abraham Hefetz, Israel S. K. A. Robson, Australia Arthur G. Appel, USA John Heraty, USA C. Rodriguez-Saona, USA Michel Baguette, France Richard James Hopkins, Sweden Gregg Roman, USA Donald Barnard, USA Fuminori Ito, Japan David Roubik, USA Rosa Barrio, Spain DavidG.James,USA Leopoldo M. Rueda, USA David T. Bilton, UK Bjarte H. Jordal, Norway Bertrand Schatz, France Guy Bloch, Israel Russell Jurenka, USA Sonja J. Scheffer, USA Anna-karin Borg-karlson, Sweden Debapratim Kar Chowdhuri, India Rudolf H. Scheffrahn, USA M. D. Breed, USA Jan Klimaszewski, Canada Nicolas Schtickzelle, Belgium Grzegorz Buczkowski, USA Shigeyuki Koshikawa, USA Kent S. Shelby, USA Rita Cervo, Italy Vladimir Kostal, Czech Republic Toru Shimada, Japan In Sik Chung, Republic of Korea Opender Koul, India Dewayne Shoemaker, USA C. Claudianos, Australia Ai-Ping Liang, China Chelsea T. Smartt, USA David Bruce Conn, USA Paul Linser, USA Pradya Somboon, Thailand J. Corley, Argentina Nathan Lo, Australia George J. Stathas, Greece Leonardo Dapporto, Italy Jean N.