Indonesia at a Glance: 2001-02

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Indonesia at a Glance: 2001-02 COUNTRY REPORT Indonesia At a glance: 2001-02 OVERVIEW President Abdurrachman Wahid’s gamble of replacing his “rainbow” cabinet with a new cabinet of party loyalists in the aftermath of the August session of the People’s Consultative Assembly has paid off in the short term by allowing him to consolidate his position. Over the longer term, however, his decision to leave out representatives of other major political parties runs the risk of antagonising important players. Another, more determined attempt at impeachment within the forecast period cannot be ruled out. Strong export growth and a hesitant recovery in the domestic economy will push GDP growth close to 4% this year, and the rate of expansion will further accelerate in 2001-02. Strong export growth will push up the merchandise trade surplus over 2001-02, but a more rapid increase in the income deficit will erode the current-account surplus. The decision to raise fuel prices and civil service salaries in October will push up consumer price inflation in 2000-01, but this will moderate in 2002. Key changes from last month Political outlook • President Wahid sacked chiefs of both the army and navy on October 9th, replacing them with their deputies. But this decisive act should not be taken as evidence that the political accommodation between the president, his vice-president and the MPR will be effective in the long term. Economic policy outlook • The government annoyed the IMF in early October by postponing the sell-off of stakes in two major banks. The IMF has also questioned a debt restructuring deal, but relations will recover. The draft 2001 budget was released at the start of October. This includes plans for a further cut in fuel subsidies, and for raising excise duties, notably on cigarettes. Economic forecast • Evidence of sustained export growth has led us to edge up our 2000 GDP growth forecast to 3.8%. September consumer price inflation data was consistent with our existing forecast of a year-end inflation rate of 8.5% this year. October 2000 The Economist Intelligence Unit 15 Regent St, London SW1Y 4LR United Kingdom The Economist Intelligence Unit The Economist Intelligence Unit is a specialist publisher serving companies establishing and managing operations across national borders. For over 50 years it has been a source of information on business developments, economic and political trends, government regulations and corporate practice worldwide. The EIU delivers its information in four ways: through our digital portfolio, where our latest analysis is updated daily; through printed subscription products ranging from newsletters to annual reference works; through research reports; and by organising conferences and roundtables. The firm is a member of The Economist Group. London New York Hong Kong The Economist Intelligence Unit The Economist Intelligence Unit The Economist Intelligence Unit 15 Regent St The Economist Building 25/F, Dah Sing Financial Centre London 111 West 57th Street 108 Gloucester Road SW1Y 4LR New York Wanchai United Kingdom NY 10019, US Hong Kong Tel: (44.20) 7830 1000 Tel: (1.212) 554 0600 Tel: (852) 2802 7288 Fax: (44.20) 7499 9767 Fax: (1.212) 586 1181/2 Fax: (852) 2802 7638 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.eiu.com Electronic delivery This publication can be viewed by subscribing online at http://store.eiu.com/brdes.html Reports are also available in various other electronic formats, such as CD-ROM, Lotus Notes, online databases and as direct feeds to corporate intranets. For further information, please contact your nearest Economist Intelligence Unit office London: Jan Frost Tel: (44.20) 7830 1183 Fax: (44.20) 7830 1023 New York: Dante Cantu Tel: (1.212) 554 0643 Fax: (1.212) 586 1181 Hong Kong: Amy Ha Tel: (852) 2802 7288/2585 3888 Fax: (852) 2802 7720/7638 Copyright © 2000 The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited. All rights reserved. Neither this publication nor any part of it may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited. All information in this report is verified to the best of the author's and the publisher's ability. However, the EIU does not accept responsibility for any loss arising from reliance on it. ISSN 0269-5413 Symbols for tables “n/a” means not available; “–” means not applicable Printed and distributed by Redhouse Press Ltd, Unit 151, Dartford Trade Park, Dartford, Kent DA1 1QB, UK Indonesia 1 Outlook for 2001-02 Political outlook Domestic politics The new system of executive government introduced after the two-week annual session of the People’s Consultative Assembly (Majelis Permusyarawatan Rakyat, MPR) that began on August 7th appears to be working better than expected. Early fears that President Abdurrachman’s decision to appoint only his own party loyalists to his new cabinet and exclude representatives from other parties would prompt an escalation of political opposition have not been borne out—so far. The decision to cede the day-to-day running of government to vice-president Megawati Sukarnoputri with the support of the two new co-ordinating ministers, the economics minister, Rizal Ramli, and the security minister, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, also appears to be bearing fruit. Although Mr Abdurrachman is continuing to test the limits of the restraints placed on him by this agreement, inter alia by taking unilateral decisions on the appointment of senior police and military officers (he dismissed both army and navy chiefs on October 10th), the embryonic system of checks and balances imposed on him by this new system has reduced policy-making volatility. Numerous problems nevertheless remain. The new cabinet is not free of the taint of corruption or cronyism. The powerful speakers of the two houses of parliament, Amien Rais and Akbar Tanjung, have begun to transform their parties, the National Mandate Party (PAN) and Golkar respectively, into opposition vehicles after they too were excluded from the cabinet. Mr Abdurrahman could easily clash with the military on such fundamental issues as tackling separatism and bringing soldiers accused of human rights abuses to account. Meanwhile, the economy is still seriously ailing, separatist sentiment in Papua and separatist violence in Aceh are, if anything, on the rise, and the sectarian conflict in Maluku is raging out of control. Even at the centre, public discontent with the slow pace of legal action on the allegations of corruption and abuse of power against the former president Suharto are provoking continued street protests. At the same time, a spate of bombings, most recently in the Jakarta Stock Exchange Building on September 13th, are being ascribed to supporters of the former president. To differing degrees, the economy, the regions and the security situation have slipped out of government control. To stand a chance of regaining control of the economy, the president will have to take a firm hand with key state institutions such as Bank Indonesia (the central bank), the Indonesian Bank Restructuring Agency (IBRA), the staples procurement agency, BULOG, and the courts. His team will have to handle the bumpy transition to greater regional autonomy over the next year. But more difficult still will be defusing separatism and sectarianism in the “outer islands”, where if any arm of government holds sway, it is the military. Partly because of its convincing EIU Country Report October 2000 © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2000 2 Indonesia claim to indispensability in these “security situations”, the military reform process appears to have stalled for now International relations Mr Abdurrahman has seemed to be putting a higher priority on Indonesia’s relations with the US, the EU and Japan. The president’s frenetic travels since coming to power have tried to establish international confidence in his government, particularly in the influential capitals of the West and Japan. His efforts have paid off, and he is still generally perceived as Indonesia’s best hope for a successful democratic transition. At the same time, however, anti-Western sentiment exists at all political levels in Indonesia, tapping into resentments over the handling of the 1997-98 regoional financial crisis and the “loss” of East Timor. As well as Australia, the US has also been increasingly criticised. Economic policy outlook Policy trends Over the next two years, monetary policy will remain mildly accommodating, as the desire not to undermine the recovery and add to the government's already heavy debt-servicing burden outweigh other considerations. Despite higher than previously expected oil prices, the government's room for fiscal manoeuvre will remain limited. The economy’s prospects will therefore depend heavily on the success of the bank and corporate restructuring programmes, something which the draft 2001 budget released in October, recognises. Corporate restructuring is expected to benefit from the more flexible approach to debt settlement now being encouraged by the IMF and the World Bank. But bank lending is expected to continue to be severely constrained by relatively high interest rates and caution about lending to the still-weak corporate sector. Fiscal policy The assumptions underlying the budget for 2000 (which covers only the nine months from April to December 2000 in order to allow a change to a calendar year period in 2001) will clearly not be met. The government budget was in fact in surplus in the first six months of fiscal year 2000, but his was due to severe underspending; a deficit is forecast for the full fiscal year, but this will narrow in 2001. The budget has for some time also looked overoptimistic in some of its revenue projections, particularly those from asset disposals by the Indonesian Bank Restructuring Agency (IBRA), privatisation and state enterprises’ dividend payments.
Recommended publications
  • Rizal Ramli Interviewer
    An initiative of the National Academy of Public Administration, and the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs and the Bobst Center for Peace and Justice, Princeton University Oral History Program Series: Governance Traps Interview no.: C7 Interviewee: Rizal Ramli Interviewer: Matthew Devlin Date of Interview: 15 July 2009 Location: Jakarta Indonesia Innovations for Successful Societies, Bobst Center for Peace and Justice Princeton University, 83 Prospect Avenue, Princeton, New Jersey, 08544, USA www.princeton.edu/successfulsocieties Use of this transcript is governed by ISS Terms of Use, available at www.princeton.edu/successfulsocieties Innovations for Successful Societies Series: Governance Traps Oral History Program Interview number: C-7 ______________________________________________________________________ DEVLIN: Today is July 15th, 2009, I’m here in Jakarta, Indonesia with Dr. Rizal Ramli. Dr. Ramli headed the nation’s State Logistics Agency and most notably was Coordinating Minister for Economic Affairs under the administration of then President Abdurrahman Wahid and also Minister of Finance among other positions in politics here in Indonesia. Dr. Ramli, thank you for joining me. If I could, could we possibly begin by you giving us a sense of the environment here in Indonesia at this transitional point between the longstanding new order and the post Suharto era? RAMLI: The Suharto regime had been in power for such a long time, more than 32 years before it fell. The longer he stayed, the more authoritarian the nature of his regime. But the core of his political support was essentially the armed forces, the bureaucracy, and of course the ruling party which is Golkar. So it is interesting to note for Suharto to go there should be an underlying shift in the perception of the key player in Indonesian politics, especially the army towards Suharto.
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesia's Transformation and the Stability of Southeast Asia
    INDONESIA’S TRANSFORMATION and the Stability of Southeast Asia Angel Rabasa • Peter Chalk Prepared for the United States Air Force Approved for public release; distribution unlimited ProjectR AIR FORCE The research reported here was sponsored by the United States Air Force under Contract F49642-01-C-0003. Further information may be obtained from the Strategic Planning Division, Directorate of Plans, Hq USAF. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Rabasa, Angel. Indonesia’s transformation and the stability of Southeast Asia / Angel Rabasa, Peter Chalk. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. “MR-1344.” ISBN 0-8330-3006-X 1. National security—Indonesia. 2. Indonesia—Strategic aspects. 3. Indonesia— Politics and government—1998– 4. Asia, Southeastern—Strategic aspects. 5. National security—Asia, Southeastern. I. Chalk, Peter. II. Title. UA853.I5 R33 2001 959.804—dc21 2001031904 Cover Photograph: Moslem Indonesians shout “Allahu Akbar” (God is Great) as they demonstrate in front of the National Commission of Human Rights in Jakarta, 10 January 2000. Courtesy of AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE (AFP) PHOTO/Dimas. RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND® is a registered trademark. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of its research sponsors. Cover design by Maritta Tapanainen © Copyright 2001 RAND All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying,
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Islamic Religious-Political
    Hamid Fahmy Zarkasyi THE RISE OF ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS-POLITICAL MOVEMENTS IN INDONESIA The Background, Present Situation and Future1 Hamid Fahmy Zarkasyi The Institute for Islamic Studies of Darussalam, Gontor Ponorogo, Indonesia Abstract: This paper traces the roots of the emergence of Islamic religious and political movements in Indonesia especially during and after their depoliticization during the New Order regime. There were two important impacts of the depoliticization, first, the emergence of various study groups and student organizations in university campuses. Second, the emergence of Islamic political parties after the fall of Suharto. In addition, political freedom after long oppression also helped create religious groups both radical on the one hand and liberal on the other. These radical and liberal groups were not only intellectual movements but also social and political in nature. Although the present confrontation between liberal and moderate Muslims could lead to serious conflict in the future, and would put the democratic atmosphere at risk, the role of the majority of the moderates remains decisive in determining the course of Islam and politics in Indonesia. Keywords: Islamic religious-political movement, liberal Islam, non-liberal Indonesian Muslims. Introduction The rise of Islamic political parties and Islamic religious movements after the fall of Suharto was not abrupt in manner. The process was gradual, involving numbers of national and global factors. 1 The earlier version of this paper was presented at the conference “Islam and Asia: Revisiting the Socio-Political Dimension of Islam,” jointly organized by Japan Institute of International Affairs (JIIA) and Institute of Islamic Understanding Malaysia (IKIM), 15-16 October, Tokyo.
    [Show full text]
  • Amidst Indonesia's Nationalist Atmospherics: the Changing
    ISSUE: 2015 NO.64 ISSN 2335-6677 RESEARCHERS AT ISEAS – YUSOF ISHAK INSTITUTE SHARE THEIR UNDERSTANDING OF CURRENT EVENTS Singapore | 6 November 2015 Amidst Indonesia’s Nationalist Atmospherics: The Changing Politics of Jokowi’s Economics By Max Lane EXECUTIVE SUMMARY President Joko Widodo is continuing to make economic growth policies, centred on attracting investment for infrastructure, his main political priority. Other issues such as his “Revolusi Mental” (Mental Revolution) or reconciliation over major human rights violations are receiving little profile. Central to Widodo’s strategy to attract investment has been two packages of policy changes aimed at cutting regulations that might hinder business investment, especially foreign business investment. A strategy so clearly reliant on open appeals to foreign money, and on deregulation to make investment easier, risks criticism on nationalistic grounds, given the nationalistic atmospherics of the 2015 election campaign and an extensive existing critique of neo- liberal deregulatory policies as being anti-national. Widodo’s government introduced some initial symbolic nationalistic policies – but they have been rewound, while nationalistic posturing on minor or “sub-text” issues has become a feature of daily politics. Nationalistic posturing remains constant but only at a low level as there appears to be no ideological – or even tactical – opposition from within parliament to Widodo’s policies. The parliamentary opposition’s own credibility as anti-foreign critics has been weakened by some of its own actions. 1 ISSUE: 2015 NO.64 ISSN 2335-6677 More fundamental nationalist economic policies – obligatory use of the rupiah and an extended Negative Investments List 1 – do remain in place, causing some Western foreign investors to remain cautious.
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesia's Puzzling Crisis
    Indonesia’s Puzzling Crisis July 16, 2001 Michael Ross Assistant Professor Department of Political Science University of California, Los Angeles [email protected] Working draft; comments welcome. Please do not cite or quote without permission. Indonesia’s Puzzling Crisis Abstract Of all the states hit by the 1997-98 Asian economic crisis, Indonesia has suffered the most, and been the hardest case for economists to explain. This paper suggests that Indonesia ’s collapse was not unique, but part of a small class of economic catastrophes caused by the interaction of two factors: personalistic authoritarian rule and financial openness. It argues that the combination of these two factors tends to produce economic collapse when investors believe the regime will soon end. To test the argument it develops an index of 45 personalistic regimes that ended between 1974 and 1999, ranks them according to an original index of financial openness, and examines their growth records during their final four years in office. It finds that those regimes that combined personalistic features with financial openness tended to suffer from unusually sharp economic reversals in their final two years. To illustrate the argument it uses the case of Indonesia, showing that investor panic was closely linked to rumors that Suharto was ill or would step down. By themselves, personalistic rule and financial openness are each compatible with high growth rates. When combined, however, they create the preconditions for a calamitous economic reversal. 2 Introduction Most studies of the 1997-98 Asian financial crisis have had trouble explaining the case of Indonesia. On the eve of the crisis, Indonesia was in a strong economic position: it was completing its third decade of high growth with low inflation and balanced budgets; its currency did not appear to be overvalued; it had a smaller current account deficit, and less short-term debt, than either Thailand or South Korea; and the Suharto government had an excellent record of economic governance, particularly during times of crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesia News & Views
    Political Issues Environment Issues Economic Issues Regional/International Issues With Special Coverage on the 64th Year of Indonesia Independence Bi -Weekly Bulletin Issue 16 Indonesia News & Views August 14, 2009 www.indonesian-embassy.fi Top quotes inside this issue: ♦ ”I don't think the terror has eroded people's confidence in Indonesia, a country that has successfully proven itself and the world to be a stable and thriving democracy...”(page 2) ♦ ”India expects to double its import-export relationship with Indonesia —currently at $10.06 billion — in the next five years.”(page 3) ♦ ”foreign investors controlled LAMPUNG 66.1 percent of assets in the local stock market, signaling a return of foreign investor Ancient Chinese travel chronicles refer to a place in the most confidence.”(page 4 ) southerly part of Sumatra called “Lampung” or “place of southerly winds”. The province is gene-rally flat with the ♦ ”among the major countries highest mountains of Gunung Pesagi, Tanggamas, in the world, Indonesia's economic growth at present Seminiung, Sekincau and Raya all being dormant volcanoes. is the third highest in the Bandar Lampung, the Provincial capital, was formerly two world after China and separate towns, Tanjungkarang and the port of Teluk Betung, India.”(page 5 ) which after the infamous eruption of Krakatau were both ♦ ”compared to the figure in completely covered in volcanic ash. May 2009, the number of foreign tourists visiting source: www.my-indonesia.info, krakatautour.com, indonesia- Indonesia through the 11 tourism.com main entry gates rose 5.51 percent.”(page 10 ) India Will Strengthen Presence in Indonesia Indonesia may see more group.
    [Show full text]
  • The Performance of High Resolution Neutron
    Jurnal Syntax Transformation Vol. 1 No. 9, November 2020 p-ISSN : 2721-3854 e-ISSN : 2721-2769 Sosial Sains POLICY CONFLICT BETWEEN PRESIDENT JOKO WIDODO AND GOVERNOR OF DKI JAKARTA ANIES BASWEDAN IN FIGHTING THE SPREAD OF COVID -19 Auderey G. Tangkudung dan Agus Sugiharto Institut Bisnis & Multimedia (IBM) ASMI Jakarta Indonesia Email: [email protected] dan [email protected] INFO ARTIKEL ABSTRACT Diterima 2 Agustus 2020 The spread of COVID-19 in Jakarta and Indonesia is very fast, Diterima dalam bentuk revisi especially in Jakarta and its surroundings. The central 15 Agustus 2020 government led by President Jokowi has policies to combat the Diterima dalam bentuk revisi spread of COVID-19, while Jakarta Governor Anies Baswedan 20 Agustus 2020 also has separate policies to combat the spread of COVID-19. Keywords: There are two different policies, and both have their own view Conflict, Policy, Leadership, in combating COVID-19. This paper discusses these policies Power. differences, the motives behind these differences, and how this policy conflict end. Further, this paper also analyzes whether or not this policy conflict represents both sides political view, and whether or not this policy conflict is related to the 2024 Presidential Election, and also which policy will be the best option for the people of Indonesia. The research methodology used is a qualitative methodology based on researching social media coverage and analyzing the news and writings contained in these media. Introduction States as the country with highest confirmed Corona virus has been known for a COVID-19 cases, followed by Italy, China, long time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Study on Newmont Divestation 2008-2016)
    The Conflict of Private-National Interests in the Divestation of PT. Newmont Nusa Tenggara’s Shares (The Study on Newmont Divestation 2008-2016) Ferdi Hasiman, Julian Aldrian Pasha, Post-graduate Student of The University of Indonesia Abstract The 1945 Constitution mandates that strategic mining must be controlled by the state. Not by foreign corporations. Based on that mandate, Indonesian government is struggling for the shares divestment of Newmont Nusa Tenggara (NNT), an American based mining company. NNT operates the Batu Hijau and the Elang Dodo Rinti mine. NNT’s Contract of Work mandates NNT to divest shares of 51 percent. NNT disobeyed the divestment order. In the divestment process, there is a conflict of private-national interests. The divestment process becomes an event to seize the oligarchy. In some term, a new oligarchy regulates Newmont. Keywords: Newmont Nusa Tenggara, Constitution’s mandate, strategic mining, Contract of Work, divestment order, Law No.4 / 2009, Agus Martowardoyo, Bakrie Group, PT. Multi Daerah Bersaing, Oligarchy, Winters, state-owned company, foreign company, Medco, civil society, Arifin Panigoro. Halaman 55 INTRODUCTION However, until the appointed time, In this paper I only want to elaborate Newmont never divested 51 percent of the the divestment of PT Newmont Nusa shares to the state. Tenggara’s shares. The purpose of the On March 3, 2008, the Indonesian divestment is to restore the mandate of The government sued Newmont for 1945 Constitution of Republic of Indonesia. international arbitration in Geneva. The Constitution mandates that strategic mining International Arbitration Decision on must be controlled by the state for the March 31, 2009 finally won the Indonesian welfare of the people.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix: List of People Interviewed
    APPENDIX: LIST OF PEOPlE INTERVIEWED Subronto Laras (President Commissioner of Indomobil Group, Salim Group; Chairman of Indonesian Employers Association, Apindo; Board of Advisor of Indonesian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Kadin), Jakarta. Gandi Sulistiyanto (Managing Director of Sinar Mas Group; Vice Chairman of Indonesian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Kadin), Jakarta. Emmy Kuswandari (Corporate Affairs and Communication, President Office, Sinar Mas Group), Jakarta. Dato’ Sri Dr. Tahir (Founder and Chairman of Mayapada Group), Jakarta. Suryo Bambang Sulisto (President Commissioner of Bumi Resources, Bakrie Group; Chairman, Indonesian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Kadin; Chairman of the Indonesian Indigenous Businessman’s Association, HIPPI), Jakarta. Sandiaga Salahudin Uno (Founder and President Director of Saratoga Investama Sedaya; Vice Chairman of Indonesian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Kadin; now Vice Governor of Jakarta), Jakarta. Chris Kanter (Chairman of Sigma Sembada Group; Vice Chairman, Indonesian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Kadin; Board of Advisor, Indonesian Employers Association, Apindo; Senior Advisor to Indonesian Minister of Trade), Jakarta. © The Author(s) 2019 223 F. Al-Fadhat, The Rise of International Capital, Critical Studies of the Asia-Pacific, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3191-6 224 APPENDIX: LIST OF PEOPLE INTERVIEWED Dr. Yandi Djajadiningrat (Bramadi Capital; Secretary General, Indonesian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Kadin, ASEAN Committee), Jakarta. Anton J. Supit (President Commissioner of Sierad Group; Chairman, Indonesian Employers Association, Apindo), Jakarta. Dr. Fadhil Hasan (Executive Director of Indonesian Palm Oil Association, GAPKI); Supervisory Board of Bank Indonesia), Jakarta. Soetrisno Bachir (Founder and Chairman of Sabira Group; Chairman of National Mandate Party (PAN) 2005–2010), Jakarta.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Nationalism in Post-Boom Indonesia: the New Normal?
    Resource nationalism in post-boom Indonesia: Eve Warburton April 2017 The new normal? RESOURCE NATIONALISM IN POST-BOOM INDONESIA: THE NEW NORMAL? The Lowy Institute for International Policy is an independent policy think tank. Its mandate ranges across all the dimensions of international policy debate in Australia — economic, political and strategic — and it is not limited to a particular geographic region. Its two core tasks are to: • produce distinctive research and fresh policy options for Australia’s international policy and to contribute to the wider international debate • promote discussion of Australia’s role in the world by providing an accessible and high-quality forum for discussion of Australian international relations through debates, seminars, lectures, dialogues and conferences. Lowy Institute Analyses are short papers analysing recent international trends and events and their policy implications. The views expressed in this paper are entirely the author’s own and not those of the Lowy Institute for International Policy. RESOURCE NATIONALISM IN POST-BOOM INDONESIA: THE NEW NORMAL? EXECUTIVE SUMMARY During the global commodity boom, Indonesia emerged as an exemplar of resource nationalism. The government introduced a range of nationalist policies in the mining sector, ranging from export bans to forced foreign divestment. Once commodity booms end, however, analysts generally predict that resource-rich states such as Indonesia will abandon the nationalist position with a view to attracting foreign investment. Indeed, historically, economic nationalism in Indonesia has peaked during the good times of a resources boom, and faded during an economic downturn. But the situation in Indonesia today seems to challenge these market-cycle theories.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Meeting on the Post-2015 Framework for Development: Growth, Structural Change and Employment
    Global Meeting on the Post-2015 Framework for Development: Growth, Structural Change and Employment Chair and speakers of Session 1, 15 May 2012 Chair: Aurelio Parisotto is a Senior Economist at the Policy Integration Department of the ILO. His current interests are the economic and social implications of the global financial crisis, policies for economic and employment recovery, local economic development and pro-poor growth. He contributed to several major reports by the ILO, UNCTAD and the United Nations. His research work on globalization and regional integration, foreign investment and transnational production networks, employment and labour markets has been published by the ILO, OECD, UNCTAD, the World Bank and commercial publishers. Speakers: José Manuel Salazar-Xirinachs is Executive Director of the International Labour Organization's Employment Sector, responsible for the ILO’s work on promoting employment and job-rich growth. In this capacity, José Manuel is managing sector’s work on a series of programmes: employment policy; sustainable enterprises; skills and employability; labour market analysis; employment services; labour market information and trends; employment intensive investments; social finance; informal economy; trade and employment; green jobs; rural employment; youth employment; gender and employment; disability; response to conflicts and disasters and employment recovery and the Global Jobs Pact. Cyn-Young Park is Assistant Chief Economist and Director of the Economic Analysis and Operations Support Division in the Economics Research Department of the Asian Development Bank (ADB). She manages a team of economists to assess socio-economic benefits of the ADB programs and projects and provide country diagnostic studies for effective ADB support to its developing member countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Copy 2019 01 23 Julast
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from Explore Bristol Research, http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk Author: Julastuti, Munthea Title: A Critical Evaluation of Indonesia's Special Economic Zones using New Institutional Economics Approach General rights Access to the thesis is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License. A copy of this may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This license sets out your rights and the restrictions that apply to your access to the thesis so it is important you read this before proceeding. Take down policy Some pages of this thesis may have been removed for copyright restrictions prior to having it been deposited in Explore Bristol Research. However, if you have discovered material within the thesis that you consider to be unlawful e.g. breaches of copyright (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please contact [email protected] and include the following information in your message: •Your contact details •Bibliographic details for the item, including a URL •An outline nature of the complaint Your claim will be investigated and, where appropriate, the item in question will be removed from public view as soon as possible. A Critical Evaluation of Indonesia’s Special Economic Zones using New Institutional Economics approach By Munthea Julastuti School of Sociology, Politics and International Studies University of Bristol A dissertation submitted to the University of Bristol in accordance with the requirements for award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Social Science and Law.
    [Show full text]