DOCSLIB.ORG

Elaborat Zaštite Okoliša

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Elaborat Zaštite Okoliša Elaborat zaštite okoliša izmjena zahvata sanacije faza 1, 2, 5, 8, 9, 10 i 11 odlagališta otpada „Novi Dvori“ - Grad Zaprešić -ocjena o potrebi procjene utjecaja zahvata na okoliš - Nositelj zahvata: Grad Zaprešić prosinac, 2017. NASLOV: ELABORAT ZAŠTITE OKOLIŠA izmjena zahvata sanacije faza 1, 2, 5, 8, 9, 10 i 11 odlagališta otpada „Novi Dvori“– Grad Zaprešić - ocjena o potrebi procjene NOSITELJ ZAHVATA: GRAD ZAPREŠIĆ, Nova ulica 10, 10290 Zaprešić UGOVOR broj: TD 99/17 IOD: T-06-P-3263-1543/17 VODITELJ: Danko Fundurulja, dipl.in.građ. IPZ Uniprojekt TERRA Danko Fundurulja, dipl. ing. građ. Tomislav Domanovac, dipl.ing.kem. tehn. univ.spec.oecoing. Suzana Mrkoci, dipl. ing. arh. Vedran Franolić, mag.ing.aedif. Irena Jurkić, ing.arh., struč.spec.ing.aedif. Ana-Marija Vrbanek, vš.m.d. Andrea Knez, mag.ing.prosp.arch. IPZ Uniprojekt MCF Sandra Novak Mujanović, dipl.ing.preh.tehn. univ.spec.oecoing. Mladen Mužinić, dipl. ing. fiz. mr.sc. Goran Pašalić, dipl. ing. rud. Jakov Burazin, mag.ing.aedif. Direktor Danko Fundurulja, dipl.ing.građ. rev.1. (rev.0 – 10/17) IPZ Uniprojekt TERRA d.o.o. TD 99/17 Elaborat zaštite okoliša – izmjena zahvata sanacije odlagališta otpada „Novi Dvori“ - Zaprešić TD 99/17 IPZ Uniprojekt TERRA d.o.o. Elaborat zaštite okoliša – izmjena zahvata sanacije odlagališta otpada „Novi Dvori“ - Zaprešić IPZ Uniprojekt TERRA d.o.o. TD 99/17 Elaborat zaštite okoliša – izmjena zahvata sanacije odlagališta otpada „Novi Dvori“ - Zaprešić TD 99/17 IPZ Uniprojekt TERRA d.o.o. Elaborat zaštite okoliša – izmjena zahvata sanacije odlagališta otpada „Novi Dvori“ - Zaprešić IPZ Uniprojekt TERRA d.o.o. TD 99/17 Elaborat zaštite okoliša – izmjena zahvata sanacije odlagališta otpada „Novi Dvori“ - Zaprešić TD 99/17 IPZ Uniprojekt TERRA d.o.o. Elaborat zaštite okoliša – izmjena zahvata sanacije odlagališta otpada „Novi Dvori“ - Zaprešić IPZ Uniprojekt TERRA d.o.o. TD 99/17 Elaborat zaštite okoliša – izmjena zahvata sanacije odlagališta otpada „Novi Dvori“ - Zaprešić TD 99/17 IPZ Uniprojekt TERRA d.o.o. Elaborat zaštite okoliša – izmjena zahvata sanacije odlagališta otpada „Novi Dvori“ - Zaprešić IPZ Uniprojekt TERRA d.o.o. TD 99/17 Elaborat zaštite okoliša – izmjena zahvata sanacije odlagališta otpada „Novi Dvori“ - Zaprešić TD 99/17 IPZ Uniprojekt TERRA d.o.o. Elaborat zaštite okoliša – izmjena zahvata sanacije odlagališta otpada „Novi Dvori“ - Zaprešić SADRŽAJ UVOD …………………………………………………………………………………………………..1 1. PODACI O ZAHVATU I OPIS OBILJEŽJA ZAHVATA ........................................ 3 1.1. ZAHVAT PREDVIĐEN STUDIJOM UTJECAJA NA OKOLIŠ ............................................................................. 6 1.2. ZAHVAT PREDVIĐEN ELABORATOM ZAŠTITE OKOLIŠA IZ 2012. GODINE ............................................ 17 1.3. ZAHVAT PREDVIĐEN OVIM ELABORATOM ................................................................................................ 24 1.4. VRSTE I KOLIČINE TVARI KOJE ULAZE U TEHNOLOŠKI PROCES ............................................................. 37 1.5. VRSTE I KOLIČINE TVARI KOJE OSTAJU NAKON TEHNOLOŠKOG PROCESA TE EMISIJE U OKOLIŠ ........ 42 1.6. POPIS DRUGIH AKTIVNOSTI KOJE MOGU BITI POTREBNE ZA REALIZACIJU ZAHVATA ........................... 44 2. PODACI O LOKACIJI I OPIS LOKACIJE ZAHVATA ........................................ 45 2.1. LOKACIJA ZAHVATA ................................................................................................................................... 45 2.2. PROSTORNO - PLANSKA DOKUMENTACIJA ............................................................................................... 47 2.3. GEOLOŠKA I HIDROGEOLOŠKA OBILJEŽJA LOKACIJE ZAHVATA .............................................................. 54 2.4. PEDOLOŠKE KARAKTERISTIKE .................................................................................................................. 59 2.5. SEIZMOTEKTONSKE KARAKTERISTIKE ..................................................................................................... 60 2.6. KLIMATOLOŠKE ZNAČAJKE ........................................................................................................................ 60 2.7. KULTURNA DOBRA ..................................................................................................................................... 65 2.8. PREGLED STANJA VODNIH TIJELA NA PODRUČJU ZAHVATA .................................................................... 65 2.9. KRAJOBRAZNE ZNAČAJKE ......................................................................................................................... 73 2.10. BIORAZNOLIKOST (STANIŠTA, BILJNI I ŽIVOTINJSKI SVIJET) .............................................................. 74 2.11. ZAŠTIĆENA PODRUČJA .............................................................................................................................. 75 2.12. PODRUČJA EKOLOŠKE MREŽE RH ............................................................................................................ 76 2.13. LOVSTVO .................................................................................................................................................... 79 2.14. ŠUME .......................................................................................................................................................... 80 2.15. POPLAVNA PODRUČJA ................................................................................................................................ 81 3. OPIS MOGUĆIH ZNAČAJNIH UTJECAJA ZAHVATA NA OKOLIŠ ............ 83 3.1. PREGLED MOGUĆIH UTJECAJA TIJEKOM IZGRADNJE IZMIJENJENOG ZAHVATA ..................................... 83 3.1.1. Mogući utjecaj na vodno dobro i tlo ................................................................. 83 3.1.2. Mogući utjecaj na zrak ...................................................................................... 83 3.1.3. Mogući utjecaj buke .......................................................................................... 83 3.1.4. Mogući utjecaj na krajobraz .............................................................................. 84 3.1.5. Mogući utjecaj na kulturno-povijesnu baštinu ................................................. 84 3.1.6. Mogući utjecaj na promet i infrastrukturu........................................................ 84 3.1.7. Mogući utjecaj prouzročen nastalim otpadom ................................................. 84 3.1.8. Mogući utjecaj na zaštićena područja ............................................................... 85 3.1.9. Mogući utjecaj na staništa, biljni i životinjski svijet .......................................... 85 3.1.10. Mogući utjecaji na područje ekološke mreže ................................................... 85 3.1.11. Mogući utjecaji u slučaju akcidentnih situacija ................................................. 85 3.1.12. Mogući utjecaj na lovstvo ................................................................................. 85 3.1.13. Mogući utjecaj na šume .................................................................................... 85 3.2. PREGLED MOGUĆIH UTJECAJA TIJEKOM KORIŠTENJA PLANIRANOG ZAHVATA ...................................... 86 3.2.1. Mogući utjecaj na vodno dobro i tlo ................................................................. 86 3.2.2. Utjecaj na zrak ................................................................................................... 88 3.2.3. Mogući utjecaj bukom ....................................................................................... 92 3.2.4. Mogući utjecaji na krajobraz ............................................................................. 94 IPZ Uniprojekt TERRA d.o.o. TD 99/17 Elaborat zaštite okoliša – izmjena zahvata sanacije odlagališta otpada „Novi Dvori“ - Zaprešić 3.2.5. Utjecaj na promet ............................................................................................. 95 3.2.6. Mogući utjecaj uslijed nastanka otpada ........................................................... 95 3.2.7. Mogući utjecaj na stanovništvo i zdravlje ljudi ................................................. 95 3.2.8. Mogući utjecaj na ekološku mrežu i biološke vrijednosti ................................. 95 3.2.9. Mogući utjecaji uslijed akcidenta ...................................................................... 95 3.2.10. Mogući prekogranični utjecaj ........................................................................... 95 3.2.11. Utjecaj zahvata na klimatske promjene ............................................................ 96 3.2.12. Utjecaj promjene klime na zahvat .................................................................... 99 3.2.13. Mogući utjecaj na lovstvo ............................................................................... 105 3.2.14. Mogući utjecaj na šume .................................................................................. 105 3.2.15. Mogući kumulativni utjecaj zahvata s drugim već izvedenim i planiranim zahvatima ........................................................................................................................ 105 4. PRIJEDLOG MJERA ZAŠTITE OKOLIŠA I PRAĆENJA STANJA OKOLIŠA ..................................................................................................................................................107 4.1. MJERE ZAŠTITE OKOLIŠA .......................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Health Insurance Zagreb
    Health Insurance for LES Embassy of the United States of America Zagreb, Croatia Combined Synopsis and Solicitation 19GE5021R0013 Questions and Answers Q1: Please provide five years of loss data(table 1) by year of account including annual net premium (for the same period), incurred claims and membership history. For membership history (Table 2) please provide the number of Employees with single coverage and with family coverage at the end of each year. Please do not include any confidential information, just the overall statistics for the group. Claims information is critical to our pricing and the relationship of claims to employee growth or shrinkage is part of the claims analysis. Table 1 Contractual year Total claims Retention Total Net gain Net gain paid (local amount premium (local USD or EUR currency) (local paid to currency) currency) Insurer (local currency) dd/mm/2016 – dd/mm/2017 dd/mm/2017 – dd/mm/2018 dd/mm/2018 – dd/mm/2019 dd/mm/2019 – dd/mm/2020 dd/mm/2020 – dd/mm/2021 Table 2 Contractual year Single Self plus ONE Family plans dd/mm/2016 – dd/mm/2017 dd/mm/2017 – dd/mm/2018 dd/mm/2018 – dd/mm/2019 dd/mm/2019 – dd/mm/2020 dd/mm/2020 – dd/mm/2021 A1: This is a first-time post is contracting this service, historical data is not available. Q2 : We would like to know if you have been informed of Catastrophic cases, such as: Hemodynamics, Open Heart Surgery, Orthopedic Mayor Surgeries, Organ Transplant, Traumatic Accident, Cancer and Oncology Cases (Radio and Chemotherapy), and hospitalizations with more than 10 days A2: The U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomination Requirements
    Nomination Requirements For the Michigan Blue Ribbon Exemplary Schools Program Prepared by: Grissom Middle School 35701 Ryan Road Sterling Heights, MI 48310 586-825-2560 Mrs. Suzanne Nye, Principal Warren Consolidated Schools Dr. James Clor, Superintendent PREPARATION OF SCHOOL SELF-ASSESSMENT STAKEHOLDERS POSITION Sue Fragnoli Co-Chair/Counselor Danielle McLean Co-Chair/Teacher Carol Klaiman Teacher/Editor/Section G Leader Sharon Fitzhenry Teacher/Editor Barbara Sikora Teacher Michelle Partridge Teacher Sandy Hawrys Secretary Karen Blaske Teacher/Section F Co-Leader Nancy Campbell Teacher/Section E Co-Leader Barbara Jones Teacher/Section H Leader Irina Hirchberger Teacher/Section C Leader Victor Kolpak Teacher/Section F Co-Leader Bob Maus Teacher/Section E Co-Leader Jennifer Pisha Teacher/Section A Leader Jacquelyn Walters Teacher/Section B Leader Heather Wasmuth Teacher/Section D Leader Dena Berke Teacher Sylvia Buck Teacher Eileen Byrnes Teacher Marge Czarnik Teacher Patrick Dailey Teacher Dave Elliott Teacher Sally Erdelean Teacher Ronna Fisher Counselor Christine Gluszewski Teacher Jeff Gray Teacher Judy Gregory Teacher Christine Guerreso Teacher Michael Gurney Teacher Heidi Kuhn Teacher Sue MacQuarrie Teacher Samar Mansour Teacher Tari Michaelson Teacher Patricia Mulholland Teacher Elizabeth Rinehart Teacher David Rodriquez Teacher Yvette Searle Teacher Jeff Skwier Teacher Debbie Tesch Teacher Justin Watson Teacher Marsha White Teacher Jeanne Yasso Teacher Elizabeth Zachary Teacher 2 PART I: ELIGIBILITY CERTIFICATION The signatures on the first page of this nomination package certify that each of the statements below concerning the school’s eligibility, previous recognition in the Blue Ribbon Schools Program, and compliance with U.S. Department of Education, Office of Civil Rights (OCR) requirements is true and correct.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030)
    Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030) Republic of Croatia MINISTRY OF THE SEA, TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 - 2030) 2nd Draft April 2017 The project is co-financed by the European Union from the European Regional Development Fund. Republic of Croatia Ministry of the Sea, Transport and Infrastructure I Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background on development of a Croatian Comprehensive National Transport Plan .................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives of the Transport Development Strategy (TDS 2016) ............................. 4 1.3 Revision of the TDS (2016) Ex-Ante conditionality .................................................. 4 1.4 Methodology for the development of the TDS (2016) ............................................ 5 2 Analysis .................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 General aspects of transport ................................................................................... 7 2.2 Public transport and zero-emission modes ........................................................... 34 2.3 Rail Transport......................................................................................................... 72 2.4 Road transport
    [Show full text]
  • Etir Code Lists
    eTIR Code Lists Code lists CL01 Equipment size and type description code (UN/EDIFACT 8155) Code specifying the size and type of equipment. 1 Dime coated tank A tank coated with dime. 2 Epoxy coated tank A tank coated with epoxy. 6 Pressurized tank A tank capable of holding pressurized goods. 7 Refrigerated tank A tank capable of keeping goods refrigerated. 9 Stainless steel tank A tank made of stainless steel. 10 Nonworking reefer container 40 ft A 40 foot refrigerated container that is not actively controlling temperature of the product. 12 Europallet 80 x 120 cm. 13 Scandinavian pallet 100 x 120 cm. 14 Trailer Non self-propelled vehicle designed for the carriage of cargo so that it can be towed by a motor vehicle. 15 Nonworking reefer container 20 ft A 20 foot refrigerated container that is not actively controlling temperature of the product. 16 Exchangeable pallet Standard pallet exchangeable following international convention. 17 Semi-trailer Non self propelled vehicle without front wheels designed for the carriage of cargo and provided with a kingpin. 18 Tank container 20 feet A tank container with a length of 20 feet. 19 Tank container 30 feet A tank container with a length of 30 feet. 20 Tank container 40 feet A tank container with a length of 40 feet. 21 Container IC 20 feet A container owned by InterContainer, a European railway subsidiary, with a length of 20 feet. 22 Container IC 30 feet A container owned by InterContainer, a European railway subsidiary, with a length of 30 feet. 23 Container IC 40 feet A container owned by InterContainer, a European railway subsidiary, with a length of 40 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Ne-Tehnički Sažetak Studije
    Studija o utjecaju na okoliš izgradnje pogona za proizvodnju elemenata od nehrđajućeg čelika te dogradnje skladišta čeličnih limova i cijevnih profila unutar poslovnog kompleksa Pireko d.o.o. u Oroslavju Ne-tehnički sažetak studije Nositelj zahvata: PIREKO d.o.o., Oroslavje Lokacija zahvata: Krapinsko-zagorska županija, Grad Oroslavje, Ovlaštenik: EKO-MONITORING d.o.o., Varaždin Varaždin, prosinac 2015. Nositelj zahvata: PIREKO d.o.o. za inženjering, proizvodnju, trgovinu, uvoz-izvoz i usluge Milana Prpića 115a, 49243 Oroslavje MBS / OIB: 080158734 / 88078264306 Odgovorna osoba: Ivica Knezić, dipl.ing.stroj. - direktor Tel.: 049 285 318 / 098 250 791 e-mail: [email protected] Lokacija zahvata: Krapinsko-zagorska županija, Grad Oroslavje, naselje Oroslavje, k.č.br. 1338/3 k.o. Oroslavje Ovlaštenik: EKO-MONITORING d.o.o., Varaždin Broj teh. dn. : 1/118-542-01-15-SUO Verzija: 1 Datum: prosinac 2015. Studija o utjecaju na okoliš izgradnje pogona za proizvodnju elemenata od nehrđajućeg čelika te dogradnje skladišta čeličnih limova i cijevnih profila unutar poslovnog kompleksa Pireko d.o.o. u Oroslavju Ne-tehnički sažetak Voditelj izrade studije: Ivica Šoltić, dipl.ing.geot. Suradnici: dr.sc.Lovorka Gotal Dmitrović, dipl.ing.kem.tehn. Helena Antić Žiger, dipl.ing.biol. Barbara Medvedec, mag.ing.biotechn. Željka Hanžek Paska, dipl.ing.kem. Krešimir Huljak, dipl.ing.stroj. Zlatko Zorić, dipl.ing.el. Igor Šarić, inf. Direktor društva: Željko Mihaljević, dipl.oec. * Ovlaštenik ima suglasnost Ministarstva zaštite okoliša i prirode za obavljanje stručnih poslova zaštite okoliša: izrada studija o utjecaju zahvata na okoliš, uključujući i dokumentaciju za provedbu postupka ocjene o potrebi procjene utjecaja zahvata na okoliš te dokumentacije vezano za određivanje sadržaja studije o utjecaju na okoliš.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatia National Report 2007
    CROATIA NATIONAL REPORT 2007 I Network The total length of motorway network, as completed by the end of 2007 in Croatia, amounts to 1163.5 km. In 2007, 75,9 km of new motorways and 3,8 km of semi motorways were built (as compared to 43 km that were built in 2006), and 15,7 km of existing roads were upgraded to the full motorway profile: On the Motorway A1: Zagreb - Split - Ploče; Dugopolje-Bisko-Šestanovac Sections (37 km) - opened to traffic in full profile in 06/2007 On the Motorway A2: Zagreb - Macelj Krapina-Macelj Section (17.2 km) –13,4 km was completed as full motorway and 3,8 km as semi motorway On the Motorway A5: Beli Manastir-Osijek-border with Bosnia and Herzegovina Sredanci-Đakovo Section (23 km) – opened to traffic as full motorway in 11/2007 On the Motorway A6: Zagreb - Rijeka - on the Vrbovsko-Bosiljevo Section (8,44 km) – upgrade to the full motorway profile of the viaduct Zeceve Drage, tunnel Veliki Gložac, viaduct Osojnik and viaduct Severinske Drage together with corresponding motorway segments in 06/2007 - on the Oštrovica-Kikovica Section (7,25 km) - upgrade to the full motorway profile in 11/2007 On the Motorway A11: Zagreb – Sisak On the Jakuševec-Velika Gorica South Section – completion of the interchange Velika Gorica South and 2,5 km of a motorway segment in 5/2007 and in 09/2007 In Croatia, motorways are operated by 4 companies, i.e. by Hrvatske autoceste d.o.o. (operates all toll motorways except for those in concession) and by three concession companies BINA-ISTRA d.d.
    [Show full text]
  • Tea Tuđa Diplomski Rad Povijest Umjetnosti.Pdf
    SVEUČILIŠTE U ZAGREBU FILOZOFSKI FAKULTET ODSJEK ZA POVIJEST UMJETNOSTI Diplomski rad BAROKNI DVORCI U OROSLAVJU: POVIJEST IZGRADNJE I PROBLEMI OČUVANJA Tea Tuđa Mentor: dr. sc. Marko Špikić Komentorica: dr. sc. Dubravka Botica ZAGREB, 2016. 1 Temeljna dokumentacijska kartica Sveučilište u Zagrebu Filozofski fakultet Odsjek za povijest umjetnosti Diplomski studij Diplomski rad BAROKNI DVORCI U OROSLAVJU: POVIJEST IZGRADNJE I PROBLEMI OČUVANJA Tea Tuđa SAŽETAK Dvorci u Oroslavju nastaju u baroknom razdoblju 17. i 18. stoljeća. Plemićke obitelji obilježile su njihov razvoj do 20. stoljeća kada zbog raznih političkih razloga gube svoj utjecaj i imovnu. Od 1920ih godina dvorci u Oroslavju, kao i drugdje u Hrvatskom zagorju počinju propadati zbog neadekvatne namjere i nebrige. Dvorac Gornje Oroslavje izgorio je 1949. godine i, usprkos radu i zalaganju konzervatora, dvorac danas više ne postoji. Dvorac Donje Oroslavje očuvao se do danas, iako je u lošem stanju. U posljednjih desetak godina intenzivno se radi na restauraciji i zaštiti kulturne baštine Oroslavja, iako je problem zaštite još uvijek prisutan. Međutim, važno je da ga lokalna zajednica pokušava riješiti i prepoznaje da je kulturno nasljeđe važan dio svake sredine. Rad je pohranjen u: Knjižnici Filozofskog fakulteta u Zagrebu. Rad sadrži: 65 stranica, 32 reprodukcije. Izvornik je na hrvatskom jeziku. Ključne riječi: dvorac, Oroslavje, zaštita, konzervacija, barok, perivoj Mentor: dr. sc. Marko Špikić, izv. prof. Komentorica: dr. sc. Dubravka Botica, izv. prof. Ocjenjivači: Datum prijave
    [Show full text]
  • General Conditions for Using A2 Motorway Zagreb - Macelj
    GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR USING A2 MOTORWAY ZAGREB - MACELJ AZM MOTORWAY REGULATIONS V.009.2012. GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR USING A2 MOTORWAY ZAGREB - MACELJ By the Decision of the Government of Republic of Croatia dated 27th March 2003 Autocesta Zagreb - Macelj d.o.o. was granted the concession for construction, development, financing, and operation of the A2 motorway, Zagreb - Macelj for period of 28 years. By the Operation and Maintenance Agreement dated 29th June 2004, Autocesta Zagreb-Macelj d.o.o. entrusted operation of the Motorway to Egis Road Operation Croatia d.o.o. Within the scope of its authorities envisaged in the Law on Concessions (Croatian National Gazette No. 89/92) and the Government„s Decision on Concession Class 340-03/99-01/03, Reg. No. 5030115-03-3, dd. 27th March 2003, Autocesta Zagreb-Macelj d.o.o. hereby issues and publishes general conditions for using Motorway Zagreb – Macelj. 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1. "AZM" - shall mean the company AUTOCESTA ZAGREB-MACELJ d.o.o., Velika Ves bb, 49 224 Lepajci. 1.2. "General Conditions" - shall mean these General Conditions for using of A2 motorway Zagreb-Macelj. 1.3. “Motorway“- shall mean Autocesta Zagreb-Macelj under concession regime. 1.4. “Interchanges” - shall mean entry and exit points of the Motorway as follows: Jankomir, Zaprešić, Mokrice, Sveti-Križ Začretje, Đurmanec and Trakošćan where the traffic from the Motorway can be transferred on the public roads. 1.5. „Operator“- shall mean Egis Road Operation Croatia d.o.o., Zagreb, Martićeva 47, the entity that operates the Motorway. 1.6. "Toll" - shall mean the amount established by a valid decision of AZM on the amount of the Toll for the use of the Motorway and tolled structures in accordance with the published price list of AZM.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017-18 CEDARS Appendices
    Comprehensive Education Data and Research System (CEDARS) Data Manual Appendices For the 2017-2018 School Year Chris Reykdal State Superintendent of January 2018 – Version 10.2 Public Instruction Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Old Capitol Building P.O. Box 47200 Olympia, WA 98504-7200 For more information about the contents of this document, please contact: Customer Support, OSPI E-mail: [email protected] Phone: 1-800-725-4311 360-725-6371 Please refer to the document number below for quicker service: 17-007 This document is available online at: CEDARS Data Manuals This material is available in an alternative format upon request. Contact the Resource Center at (888) 595-3276, TTY (360) 664-3631. CEDARS Appendix for 2017-2018 January 2018 Version 10.2 Page 2 Comprehensive Education Data and Research System (CEDARS) Appendix Manual for the 2017-2018 School Year Chris Reykdal Superintendent of Public Instruction Katie Weaver-Randall Director Student Information January 2018 CEDARS Appendix for 2017-2018 January 2018 Version 10.2 Page 3 Revisions Made in Current Appendices Revision Authors Date Description 10.0 Lisa Ireland February 2017 Publication Process Appendix A – County District Codes Appendix F – Student Attributes and Programs File Appendix J – Learning Assistance Program Student Growth Assessments Appendix N – English Learners Placement Status Appendix O – Content Area Codes Appendix X – Free/Reduced-Price Meal Eligibility Status or Low Income 10.1 Lisa Ireland August 2017 Appendix B - Behavior Appendix J – Student Growth Assessments Appendix L – Washington State Seal of Biliteracy/World Language Competency Test Results 10.2 Lisa Ireland January 2018 Appendix I – Disability Codes Appendix K – Language Codes CEDARS Appendix for 2017-2018 January 2018 Version 10.2 Page 4 CEDARS Data Manual Appendix TABLE OF CONTENTS Revisions Made in Current Manual .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Psychometric Characteristics of Croatian Version of the Daily Spiritual Experience Scale
    Religions 2015, 6, 712–723; doi:10.3390/rel6020712 OPEN ACCESS religions ISSN 2077-1444 www.mdpi.com/journal/religions Article Psychometric Characteristics of Croatian Version of the Daily Spiritual Experience Scale Željko Rakošec 1,*, Štefica Mikšić 2, Brankica Juranić 2 and Lana Batinić 3 1 Faculty of Philosophy of the Society of Jesus-Centre for Croatian Studies, University of Zagreb, Jordanovac 110, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia 2 Faculty of Medicine Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Cara Hadrijana 10/E, 31000 Osijek, Croatia; E-Mails: [email protected] (Š.M.); [email protected] (B.J.) 3 Department of Psychology, Catholic University of Croatia, Ilica 242, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]. Academic Editor: Peter I. Kaufman Received: 12 March 2015 / Accepted: 11 June 2015 / Published: 17 June 2015 Abstract: Background: The Daily Spiritual Experience Scale (DSES) has been developed through extensive and qualitative research. Numerous studies have confirmed the reliability and validity of the DSES among different populations. Most of the studies have shown association of the DSES with physical and psychological well-being. Purpose: The current study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the DSES in the Croatian population. Method: The 16-item scale was translated through standard translation/back-translation procedures. The scale was afterwards applied to a sample of 535 test subjects (49% men and 51% women), mean age 42.6 years. Results: The coefficient of reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.945) is very high. The coefficients of discriminant validity were satisfactory for 15 items, whereas only one item (14) has a coefficient of less than 0.30.
    [Show full text]
  • CROATIAN MOTORWAYS Ltd. – a SPONSOR OR a MANAGER Marijo Lovrinčević, Hrvatske Autoceste D.O.O., Zagreb, HR Marijo.Lovrinčević@Hac.Hr
    A WAY TO SUCCESS: CROATIAN MOTORWAYS Ltd. – A SPONSOR OR A MANAGER Marijo Lovrinčević, Hrvatske autoceste d.o.o., Zagreb, HR Marijo.Lovrinčević@hac.hr The intensive construction of motorways in Croatia that has marked the previous decade posed great challenges before all participants in what is undoubtedly the greatest Croatian infrastructure project in the history. Motorways are public good and as such are of national importance which makes the role of the Government and of Croatian Motorways Ltd. ( Hrvatske Autoceste - HAC) that operate the network on its behalf very responsible. Before opening to traffic kilometres of motorways, a series of procedures had to be implemented including planning, design development and construction during which many subjects and institutions were engaged and often for long periods of time. This has resulted in such projects being subject to many political, economical, social and other impacts that directly affect their completion. The paper shows their relations and envisages the role of the investor as a sponsor i.e. operator within a specific institutional framework as is Hrvatske Autoceste company that has established, in the conditions of accelerated development, a professional, competent and motivated structure open to new knowledge and willing to accept new ideas and changes. The cooperation of all participants is a guarantee of success. KEY WORDS: construction of motorways, the role of investor, institutional framework, success. INTRODUCTION An efficient transport system is of great importance for any country's economy. The development of transport infrastructure depends on political, economic and sociological conditions of regions. Since these are structures of national importance the models for the construction of this infrastructure are based on the adopted transport policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Coding and Validation Manual
    TRO EC N L IC E ACCIDENT MENU 2002 VEHICLE MENU FARS CODING AND DRIVER MENU VALIDATION MANUAL U.S. Department PERSON Of Transportation MENU National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ACCIDENT LEVEL VEHICLE LEVEL DRIVER LEVEL PERSON LEVEL APPENDIX LEVEL 2002 MANUAL CHANGES Below is a list of FARS elements that have substantial changes for 2002. These changes, as well as others, are highlighted within the manual by bold/italic type and are marked in the margin with a pointing hand graphic. ELEMENT # ELEMENT NAME NEW/ NEW/ REVISED REVISED COMMENTS VALUES REMARKS A15 Global Positioning X Geo-Locator tool A18 Manner of Collision X X All new codes and remarks A29 Traffic Control Device X New code 41-Electronic Warning Sign A33 Hit-and-Run X X Revised wording of Code 2 New code 4 A39 Related Factors-Accident X X New layout for codes (Example Level Table moved to front of element) New or combined codes Deleted codes V7, V8, V9 Make/Model/Body Type X Updated for 2002 Vehicles Table V16 Vehicle Maneuver X X Code 09 – Controlled Maneuver to Avoid… V21 Vehicle Role X Relating to front-to-front (head- on) collisions V29 Gross Vehicle Weight X Coding of element on power Rating unit only. V34 Related Factors-Vehicle X X New layout for codes (Example Level Table moved to front of element) New or combined codes Deleted codes D12 Driver Height X Revised remarks D13 Driver Weight X Revised remarks D14-18 Driver Level Counters X Previous Recorded Suspensions and Revocations – Can code up to 10 instances without being questioned by Edit Check D22 Related Factors-Driver X X New layout for codes (Example Level Table moved to front of element) New or combined codes Deleted codes P9 Seating Position X X Code 51 should be used for coding passengers in 5th row of 15-seat, 5-row vans.
    [Show full text]