DOCSLIB.ORG

Preliminary Lander Cubesat Design for Small Asteroid Detumbling Mission

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Preliminary Lander Cubesat Design for Small Asteroid Detumbling Mission DEGREE PROJECT IN VEHICLE ENGINEERING, SECOND CYCLE, 30 CREDITS STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN 2018 Preliminary Lander CubeSat Design for Small Asteroid Detumbling Mission AGNE PASKEVICIUTE KTH ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES Preliminary Lander CubeSat Design for Small Asteroid Detumbling Mission AgnėPaökevičiūtė Department of Aeronautical and Vehicle Engineering KTH Royal Institute of Technology This thesis is submitted for the degree of Master of Science October 2018 Skiriu ö˛ darbπsavo mamai Graûinai ir tėčiui Algirdui. Acknowledgements This thesis would have not been possible without the encouragement and support of numerous people in my life. I would especially like to thank Dr Michael C. F. Bazzocchi for his support and constructive advice throughout my research. In addition, I would like to express my gratitude to researchers, professors and staffat Luleå University of Technology, Space Campus, for their ideas and help in practical matters. I would like to sincerely thank my family, boyfriend, and friends for believing in me, encour- aging me to reach for my dreams, and loving me without any expectations. Last but not least, I am truly grateful for the opportunities KTH Royal Institute of Technol- ogy provided. Sammanfattning Gruvdrift på asteroider förväntas att bli verklighet inom en snar framtid. Det första steget är att omdirigera en asteroid till en stabil omloppsbana runt jorden så att gruvteknik kan demon- streras. Bromsning av asteroidens tumlande är en av de viktigaste stegen i ett rymduppdrag där en asteroid ska omdirigeras. I detta examensarbete föreslås en preliminär asteroidlandare baserad på CubeSat-teknik för ett rymduppdrag där en asteroid ska omdirigeras. En asteroid av Arjuna-typ, 2014 UR, med en diameter på mellan 10.6 och 21.2 m är vald som kandidat för rymduppdraget. På grund av att asteroidens är relativt liten till storlek måste landningen utföras med en aktiv reglermetod och rymdfarkosten måste förankras till asteroiden. Med hjälp av en beslutsmetod utifrån flera mål, PROMETHEE, identifierades förankringsme- toden “mikro-ryggrads-gripare” som den mest lämpliga. Tre huvuduppgifter för rymduppdraget identifierades under designprocessen: dataflöde mellan landaren och moderfarkosten, Delta-V-budgeten och peknoggrannheten. Delta-V som krävs för landning på asteroiden uppskattas att vara högst 10 m/s. Bromsningen av tumlandet kostar högst 15 m/s. Osäkerheten med Delta-V för bromning av tumlandet beror på olika up- pskattningar av asteroidens storlek. Den nödvändiga minsta peknoggrannheten uppskattades vara 6°. Utformningen av landaren, baserade på CubeSat-teknik, använder till största delen kom- ponenter som finns på hyllan, s.k. commercial-off-the-shelf. Det visas att en CubeSat-landare inte kan bromsa tumlandet för en asteroid som roterar snabbt kring flera axlar. Om den valda asteroiden roterar runt en axel med en rotationsperiod på 2.4 timmar, är det möjligt att bromsa tumlandet med endast 1.5 kg drivmedel. Den föreslagna landaren är en 12U CubeSat med en total massa på 15 kg och strömförbrukning på 65 W. Abstract Asteroid mining is expected to become reality in the near future. The first step is to redirect an asteroid to a stable Earth orbit so that mining technologies can be demonstrated. Detumbling of the asteroid is one of the important steps in asteroid redirection missions. In this thesis, a preliminary lander CubeSat design is suggested for a small asteroid detumbling mission. The candidate asteroid for the detumbling mission is chosen to be 2014 UR, an Arjuna- type asteroid with an estimated diameter ranging from 10.6 to 21.2 m. Due to the small size of the asteroid, the landing must be performed with an active control method after which the spacecraft must be firmly anchored to the asteroid. By using the multi-criteria decision mak- ing method PROMETHEE, the microspine gripper is chosen as the most suitable anchoring mechanism. Three main mission drivers are identified during the design process: data-flow between the lander and the mothership, Delta-V budget and pointing accuracy. The Delta-V required for landing on the asteroid and despinning it is estimated to be 10 m/s and 0.15 m/s at most, respectively. The uncertainty with the despinning Delta-V is due to varying estimates of the size of the asteroid. The required minimum pointing accuracy is estimated to be 6◦. The preliminary lander CubeSat design can be largely realised with commercial off-the- shelf components suggested in this work. Only some of the components have to be custom built or the technologies further developed. It is shown that a CubeSat lander is not able to detumble an asteroid that is rotating fast around multiple axis. However, if the considered asteroid is rotating around a single axis with a rotational period of 2.4 h, it is be possible to despin it by spending just 1.5 kg of propellant. The suggested lander is a 12U CubeSat with an overall mass of 15 kg and power consumption of 65 W. Contents List of Figures ix List of Tables xi Nomenclature xiii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Literature Review . 1 1.2 Motivation . 3 1.3 Preliminary Mission Description . 4 1.4 Thesis Overview . 5 2 Target Asteroid 6 2.1 Spectral Types of Asteroids . 6 2.2 Near-Earth Asteroids . 7 2.3 Asteroid 2014 UR . 10 2.3.1 Spectral Type of 2014 UR . 11 2.3.2 Surface Properties . 12 3 Forces Acting on The Landed Spacecraft 13 3.1 Introduction . 13 3.2 Gravitational Force . 16 3.3 Solar Radiation Pressure . 16 3.4 Electrostatic Force . 16 3.5 Centrifugal Force . 17 3.6 Despinning Force . 19 3.7 Net Force Acting on The Spacecraft . 21 Contents vii 4 Landing Systems Review and Choice 23 4.1 Literature Review . 23 4.1.1 Active Descent . 24 4.1.2 Passive Descent . 26 4.2 Landing Mechanism Selection . 27 5 Anchoring Systems Review 29 5.1 Literature Review . 29 5.1.1 Slow Anchoring Methods . 30 5.1.2 High-Speed Anchoring Methods . 32 5.2 Criteria for Successful Anchoring . 37 5.3 Discussion of Suitable Anchoring Systems . 37 5.3.1 Summary of Anchoring Systems Candidates . 38 6 Anchoring System Choice Using MCDM 41 6.1 Introduction . 41 6.2 Criteria Description . 43 6.3 Criteria Weights . 46 6.3.1 Optimal Pairwise Comparison . 47 6.3.2 Weights of Criteria . 50 6.4 Method of Aggregation . 51 6.4.1 PROMETHEE Method . 52 6.4.2 Discussion . 56 7 Primary Mission Drivers 57 7.1 Mission Data-Flow . 57 7.2 Delta-V Budget . 59 7.2.1 Sphere of Influence . 59 7.2.2 Delta-V Estimation: Docking . 60 7.2.3 Delta-V Estimation: Despinning . 62 7.3 Pointing accuracy . 62 8 Preliminary Spacecraft Design 64 8.1 Attitude and Orbit Control Subsystem . 64 8.1.1 Actuators . 65 8.1.2 Sensors . 67 8.2 Propulsion Subsystem . 69 Contents viii 8.2.1 Propellant Budget . 69 8.2.2 Subsystem Choice . 71 8.3 Anchoring Subsystem . 74 8.4 Communications Subsystem . 75 8.5 Other Subsystems . 76 8.5.1 Command and Data Handling Subsystem . 76 8.5.2 Thermal Subsystem . 77 8.5.3 Structure . 77 8.6 Power Subsystem . 77 8.7 Mass and Power Budget . 79 9 Conclusion 81 Bibliography 84 Appendix A Technology Readiness Levels 91 Appendix B Multi-Criteria Decision Making 92 B.1 Pairwise Comparison of Anchoring Criteria . 92 B.2 MATLAB Script for Pairwise Difference Comparison . 97 B.3 PROMETHEE Preference Functions and Parameters . 100 Appendix C Clohessy-Wiltshire Equations 103 C.1 Coordinate System . 103 C.2 Equations of Motion . 104 Appendix D Preliminary Design & Subsystems 106 D.1 Moment Arm & Moment of Inertia . 106 List of Figures 1.1 Operational concept sketch. Adapted from Probst and Förstner [1]. 5 2.1 Three subgroups of NEAs and their orbits with respect to Earth’s orbit around the Sun [2]. ................................... 8 3.1 Schematic diagram showing the lander on the surface of asteroid with the main natural forces acting on it. 14 3.2 Resultant centrifugal force distribution on asteroid 2014 UR for the worst case scenario. 18 3.3 Best case scenario force and time required for despinning the asteroid. 19 3.4 Landing location and direction of forces required for despinning the asteroid in the worst case scenario. 20 3.5 Worst case scenario force and time required for despinning the asteroid. 21 4.1 GRASP lander developed by SFL [3]. ..................... 24 4.2 Spinning lander concepts suggested by SCSG. 25 4.3 Surface mobility mechanisms patented by University of California [4]. 26 4.4 MASCOT mobility concept - eccentric arm concept [5]. 27 5.1 Sample self-opposing drill systems [6]..................... 31 5.2 Experimental setup of robotic arm presenting anchoring technology based on sawing method [7]. ............................... 32 5.3 Left: NASA JPL microspine grippers being tested for anchoring strength at 45◦. Right: CAD view of microspine gripper cross-section [8, 9]. 33 5.4 Telescoping spike anchoring system [10]. ................... 34 5.5 Telescoping spike system for ST4/Champollion mission [10]. 35 5.6 Tethered spike anchoring system [10]. ..................... 36 5.7 Philae harpoon anchoring system mounted in the landing gear [11]. 36 5.8 Magnetic anchoring concept “Harvestor” by Deep Space Industries [6]. 37 List of Figures x 6.1 Flowchart for the MCDM methodology. 42 7.1 Data-flow diagram for asteroid detumbling mission. Round shapes denote data source, rectangles denote tasks, hexagon denotes data end user. 58 7.2 Delta-V required to dock with asteroid 2014 UR versus rendezvous time. 61 7.3 Scheme for estimating required maximum pointing angle to the asteroid 2014 UR, just after spacecraft release from the mothership. 63 8.1 Attitude control motion in two dimensions [12].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Self Reconfigurable Undulating Grasper for Asteroid Mining
    A SELF RECONFIGURABLE UNDULATING GRASPER FOR ASTEROID MINING Suzanna Lucarotti1, Chakravarthini M Saaj1, Elie Allouis2 and Paolo Bianco3 1Surrey Space Centre, Guildford UK 2Airbus DS, Stevenage UK 3Airbus, Portsmouth UK ABSTRACT are estimated as over 1km diameter and 4133 as 300- 1000m diameter. While surface features remain mostly unknown, mass and orbit parameters are available. The Recent missions to asteroids have shown that many have closest NEAs can be reached with less ∆V than the rubble surfaces, which current extra-terrestrial mining Moon. techniques are unsuited for. This paper discusses mod- elling work for autonomous mining on small solar system There have been so far been five missions to the sur- bodies, such as Asteroids. A novel concept of a modular face of SSSBs - NEAR-Shoemaker to Eros, where they robot system capable of the helical caging and grasping unexpectedly landed [9], Hayabusa 1 to Itokawa [10], of surface rocks is presented. The kinematics and co- Rosetta to the Comet 67P Churyumov-Gerasimenko [11], ordinate systems of the Self RecoNfigurable Undulating Hayabusa 2 to Ryugu [12], and OSIRIS-Rex to Bennu Grasper (SNUG) are derived with a new mathematical [13]. Hayabusa 2 and OSIRUS-Rex are both currently formulation. This approach exploits rotational symmetry live missions. Detailed close-range surface images have and homogeneity to form a cage to safely grasp a target of been obtained from Itokawa, 67P and Ryugu, higher alti- uncertain properties. A simple model for grasping is eval- tude images from low orbit or prior to landing have been uated to assess the grasping capabilities of such a robot.
    [Show full text]
  • Asteroid Retrieval Mission
    Where you can put your asteroid Nathan Strange, Damon Landau, and ARRM team NASA/JPL-CalTech © 2014 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Distant Retrograde Orbits Works for Earth, Moon, Mars, Phobos, Deimos etc… very stable orbits Other Lunar Storage Orbit Options • Lagrange Points – Earth-Moon L1/L2 • Unstable; this instability enables many interesting low-energy transfers but vehicles require active station keeping to stay in vicinity of L1/L2 – Earth-Moon L4/L5 • Some orbits in this region is may be stable, but are difficult for MPCV to reach • Lunar Weakly Captured Orbits – These are the transition from high lunar orbits to Lagrange point orbits – They are a new and less well understood class of orbits that could be long term stable and could be easier for the MPCV to reach than DROs – More study is needed to determine if these are good options • Intermittent Capture – Weakly captured Earth orbit, escapes and is then recaptured a year later • Earth Orbit with Lunar Gravity Assists – Many options with Earth-Moon gravity assist tours Backflip Orbits • A backflip orbit is two flybys half a rev apart • Could be done with the Moon, Earth or Mars. Backflip orbit • Lunar backflips are nice plane because they could be used to “catch and release” asteroids • Earth backflips are nice orbits in which to construct things out of asteroids before sending them on to places like Earth- Earth or Moon orbit plane Mars cyclers 4 Example Mars Cyclers Two-Synodic-Period Cycler Three-Synodic-Period Cycler Possibly Ballistic Chen, et al., “Powered Earth-Mars Cycler with Three Synodic-Period Repeat Time,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Sept.-Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1, Version A
    INCLUSIVE EDUCATION AND SCHOOL REFORM IN POSTCOLONIAL INDIA Mousumi Mukherjee MA, MPhil, Calcutta University; MA Loyola University Chicago; EdM University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Education Policy and Leadership Melbourne Graduate School of Education University of Melbourne [5 June 2015] Keywords Inclusive Education, Equity, Democratic School Reform, Girls’ Education, Missionary Education, Postcolonial theory, Globalization, Development Inclusive Education and School Reform in Postcolonial India i Abstract Over the past two decades, a converging discourse has emerged around the world concerning the importance of socially inclusive education. In India, the idea of inclusive education is not new, and is consistent with the key principles underpinning the Indian constitution. It has been promoted by a number of educational thinkers of modern India such as Vivekananda, Aurobindo, Gandhi, Ambedkar, Azad and Tagore. However, the idea of inclusive education has been unevenly and inadequately implemented in Indian schools, which have remained largely socially segregated. There are of course major exceptions, with some schools valiantly seeking to realize social inclusion. One such school is in Kolkata, which has been nationally and globally celebrated as an example of best practice. The main aim of this thesis is to examine the initiative of inclusive educational reform that this school represents. It analyses the school’s understanding of inclusive education; provides an account of how the school promoted its achievements, not only within its own community but also around the world; and critically assesses the extent to which the initiatives are sustainable in the long term.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery of Earth's Quasi-Satellite
    Meteoritics & Planetary Science 39, Nr 8, 1251–1255 (2004) Abstract available online at http://meteoritics.org Discovery of Earth’s quasi-satellite Martin CONNORS,1* Christian VEILLET,2 Ramon BRASSER,3 Paul WIEGERT,4 Paul CHODAS,5 Seppo MIKKOLA,6 and Kimmo INNANEN3 1Athabasca University, Athabasca AB, Canada T9S 3A3 2Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope, P. O. Box 1597, Kamuela, Hawaii 96743, USA 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3 Canada 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada 5Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91109, USA 6Turku University Observatory, Tuorla, FIN-21500 Piikkiö, Finland *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (Received 18 February 2004; revision accepted 12 July 2004) Abstract–The newly discovered asteroid 2003 YN107 is currently a quasi-satellite of the Earth, making a satellite-like orbit of high inclination with apparent period of one year. The term quasi- satellite is used since these large orbits are not completely closed, but rather perturbed portions of the asteroid’s orbit around the Sun. Due to its extremely Earth-like orbit, this asteroid is influenced by Earth’s gravity to remain within 0.1 AU of the Earth for approximately 10 years (1997 to 2006). Prior to this, it had been on a horseshoe orbit closely following Earth’s orbit for several hundred years. It will re-enter such an orbit, and make one final libration of 123 years, after which it will have a close interaction with the Earth and transition to a circulating orbit.
    [Show full text]
  • Argops) Solution to the 2017 Astrodynamics Specialist Conference Student Competition
    AAS 17-621 THE ASTRODYNAMICS RESEARCH GROUP OF PENN STATE (ARGOPS) SOLUTION TO THE 2017 ASTRODYNAMICS SPECIALIST CONFERENCE STUDENT COMPETITION Jason A. Reiter,* Davide Conte,1 Andrew M. Goodyear,* Ghanghoon Paik,* Guanwei. He,* Peter C. Scarcella,* Mollik Nayyar,* Matthew J. Shaw* We present the methods and results of the Astrodynamics Research Group of Penn State (ARGoPS) team in the 2017 Astrodynamics Specialist Conference Student Competition. A mission (named Minerva) was designed to investigate Asteroid (469219) 2016 HO3 in order to determine its mass and volume and to map and characterize its surface. This data would prove useful in determining the necessity and usefulness of future missions to the asteroid. The mission was designed such that a balance between cost and maximizing objectives was found. INTRODUCTION Asteroid (469219) 2016 HO3 was discovered recently and has yet to be explored. It lies in a quasi-orbit about the Earth such that it will follow the Earth around the Sun for at least the next several hundred years providing many opportunities for relatively low-cost missions to the body. Not much is known about 2016 HO3 except a general size range, but its close proximity to Earth makes a scientific mission more feasible than other near-Earth objects. A Request For Proposal (RFP) was provided to university teams searching for cost-efficient mission design solutions to assist in the characterization of the asteroid and the assessment of its potential for future, more in-depth missions and possible resource utilization. The RFP provides constraints on launch mass, bus size as well as other mission architecture decisions, and sets goals for scientific mapping and characterization.
    [Show full text]
  • Asteroid Retrieval Feasibility Study
    Asteroid Retrieval Feasibility Study 2 April 2012 Prepared for the: Keck Institute for Space Studies California Institute of Technology Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, California 1 2 Authors and Study Participants NAME Organization E-Mail Signature John Brophy Co-Leader / NASA JPL / Caltech [email protected] Fred Culick Co-Leader / Caltech [email protected] Co -Leader / The Planetary Louis Friedman [email protected] Society Carlton Allen NASA JSC [email protected] David Baughman Naval Postgraduate School [email protected] NASA ARC/Carnegie Mellon Julie Bellerose [email protected] University Bruce Betts The Planetary Society [email protected] Mike Brown Caltech [email protected] Michael Busch UCLA [email protected] John Casani NASA JPL [email protected] Marcello Coradini ESA [email protected] John Dankanich NASA GRC [email protected] Paul Dimotakis Caltech [email protected] Harvard -Smithsonian Center for Martin Elvis [email protected] Astrophysics Ian Garrick-Bethel UCSC [email protected] Bob Gershman NASA JPL [email protected] Florida Institute for Human and Tom Jones [email protected] Machine Cognition Damon Landau NASA JPL [email protected] Chris Lewicki Arkyd Astronautics [email protected] John Lewis University of Arizona [email protected] Pedro Llanos USC [email protected] Mark Lupisella NASA GSFC [email protected] Dan Mazanek NASA LaRC [email protected] Prakhar Mehrotra Caltech [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • OSIRIS-Rex Goes Asteroid Collecting
    OSIRIS-REx Goes Asteroid Collecting — Scott Messenger, NASA Johnson Space Center OSIRIS-REx is NASA’s third New Frontiers mission, following the New Horizons mission, which completed a flyby of Pluto in 2015, and the Juno mission to orbit Jupiter, which has just begun science operations. The OSIRIS-REx mission’s primary objective is to collect pristine surface samples of a carbonaceous asteroid and return them to Earth for analysis. Carbonaceous asteroids and comets are considered to be L “primitive” bodies that have preserved remnants of the solar system starting materials. By studying them, scientists can learn about the origin and earliest evolution of the solar system. The OSIRIS-REx spacecraft was launched on September 8, 2016, beginning its two- year journey to asteroid 101955 Bennu (formerly designated 1999 RQ36). After more than one year of detailed remote observations, OSIRIS-REx will obtain surface samples and return them to Earth in September 2023. The OSIRIS-REx proposal, led by the late Dr. Michael J. Drake, was selected during the 2011 New Frontiers competition, and is now led by Dr. Dante Lauretta of the University of Arizona. The Pmission name OSIRIS-REx (an acronym for Origins, Spectral Interpretation, Resource Identification, Security, Regolith Explorer) embodies five objectives: (1) Origins: Return and analyze a sample of a carbonaceous asteroid; (2) Spectral Interpretation: Provide ground truth for remote observations of asteroids; (3) Resource Identification: Determine the mineral and chemical makeup of a near-Earth asteroid; (4) Security: Directly measure the non-gravitational force known as the Yarkovsky effect, which changes asteroidal orbits through its Iinteraction with sunlight; and (5) Regolith Explorer: Determine the properties of unconsolidated material that covers the asteroid surface.
    [Show full text]
  • “Target Selection for a HAIV Flight Demo Mission,” IAA-PDC13-04
    Planetary Defense Conference 2013 IAA-PDC13-04-08 Target Selection for a Hypervelocity Asteroid Intercept Vehicle Flight Validation Mission Sam Wagnera,1,∗, Bong Wieb,2, Brent W. Barbeec,3 aIowa State University, 2271 Howe Hall, Room 2348, Ames, IA 50011-2271, USA bIowa State University, 2271 Howe Hall, Room 2325, Ames, IA 50011-2271, USA cNASA/GSFC, Code 595, 8800 Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD, 20771, USA, 301.286.1837 Abstract Asteroids and comets have collided with the Earth in the past and will do so again in the future. Throughout Earth’s history these collisions have played a significant role in shaping Earth’s biological and geological histories. The planetary defense community has been examining a variety of options for mitigating the impact threat of asteroids and comets that approach or cross Earth’s orbit, known as near-Earth objects (NEOs). This paper discusses the preliminary study results of selecting small (100-m class) NEO targets and mission design trade-offs for flight validating some key planetary defense technologies. In particular, this paper focuses on a planetary defense demo mission for validating the effectiveness of a Hypervelocity Asteroid Intercept Vehicle (HAIV) concept, currently being investigated by the Asteroid Deflection Research Center (ADRC) for a NIAC (NASA Advanced Innovative Concepts) Phase 2 project. Introduction Geological evidence shows that asteroids and comets have collided with the Earth in the past and will do so in the future. Such collisions have played an important role in shaping the Earth’s biological and geological histories. Many researchers in the planetary defense community have examined a variety of options for mitigating the impact threat of Earth approaching or crossing asteroids and comets, known as near-Earth objects (NEOs).
    [Show full text]
  • Satellite Capture Mechanism in a Sun-Planet-Binary Four-Body System
    Satellite capture mechanism in a sun-planet-binary four-body system Shengping Gong*, Miao Li † School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing China, 100084 Abstract This paper studies the binary disruption problem and asteroid capture mechanism in a sun-planet-binary four-body system. Firstly, the binary disruption condition is studied and the result shows that the binary is always disrupted at the perigee of their orbit instantaneously. Secondly, an analytic expression to describe the energy exchange between the binary is derived based on the ‘instantaneous disruption’ hypothesis. The analytic result is validated through numerical integration. We obtain the energy exchange in encounters simultaneously by the analytic expression and numerical integration. The maximum deviation of this two results is always less than 25% and the mean deviation is about 8.69%. The analytic expression can give us an intuitive description of the energy exchange between the binary. It indicates that the energy change depends on the hyperbolic shape of the binary orbit with respect to the planet, the masses of planet and the primary member of the binary, the binary phase at perigee. We can illustrate the capture/escape processes and give the capture/escape region of the binary clearly by numerical simulation. We analyse the influence of some critical *Associate professor, School of Aerospace Engineering; [email protected] † PhD candidate, School of Aerospace Engineering; [email protected] 1 factors to the capture region finally. Key words: binary; capture mechanism; disruption; analytic derivation; numerical results 1 Introduction In the last decade, hundreds of irregular satellites orbiting giant planets have been found in our solar system.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Atens Enjoy Enhanced Accessibility for Human Space Flight
    (Preprint) AAS 11-449 WHY ATENS ENJOY ENHANCED ACCESSIBILITY FOR HUMAN SPACE FLIGHT Daniel R. Adamo* and Brent W. Barbee† Near-Earth objects can be grouped into multiple orbit classifications, among them being the Aten group, whose members have orbits crossing Earth's with semi-major axes less than 1 astronomical unit. Atens comprise well under 10% of known near-Earth objects. This is in dramatic contrast to results from recent human space flight near-Earth object accessibility studies, where the most favorable known destinations are typically almost 50% Atens. Geocentric dynamics explain this enhanced Aten accessibility and lead to an understanding of where the most accessible near-Earth objects reside. Without a com- prehensive space-based survey, however, highly accessible Atens will remain largely un- known. INTRODUCTION In the context of human space flight (HSF), the concept of near-Earth object (NEO) accessibility is highly subjective (Reference 1). Whether or not a particular NEO is accessible critically depends on mass, performance, and reliability of interplanetary HSF systems yet to be designed. Such systems would cer- tainly include propulsion and crew life support with adequate shielding from both solar flares and galactic cosmic radiation. Equally critical architecture options are relevant to NEO accessibility. These options are also far from being determined and include the number of launches supporting an HSF mission, together with whether consumables are to be pre-emplaced at the destination. Until the unknowns of HSF to NEOs come into clearer focus, the notion of relative accessibility is of great utility. Imagine a group of NEOs, each with nearly equal HSF merit determined from their individual characteristics relating to crew safety, scientific return, resource utilization, and planetary defense.
    [Show full text]
  • The Population of Near Earth Asteroids in Coorbital Motion with Venus
    ARTICLE IN PRESS YICAR:7986 JID:YICAR AID:7986 /FLA [m5+; v 1.65; Prn:10/08/2006; 14:41] P.1 (1-10) Icarus ••• (••••) •••–••• www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus The population of Near Earth Asteroids in coorbital motion with Venus M.H.M. Morais a,∗, A. Morbidelli b a Grupo de Astrofísica da Universidade de Coimbra, Observatório Astronómico de Coimbra, Santa Clara, 3040 Coimbra, Portugal b Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, BP 4229, Boulevard de l’Observatoire, Nice Cedex 4, France Received 13 January 2006; revised 10 April 2006 Abstract We estimate the size and orbital distributions of Near Earth Asteroids (NEAs) that are expected to be in the 1:1 mean motion resonance with Venus in a steady state scenario. We predict that the number of such objects with absolute magnitudes H<18 and H<22 is 0.14 ± 0.03 and 3.5 ± 0.7, respectively. We also map the distribution in the sky of these Venus coorbital NEAs and we see that these objects, as the Earth coorbital NEAs studied in a previous paper, are more likely to be found by NEAs search programs that do not simply observe around opposition and that scan large areas of the sky. © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: Asteroids, dynamics; Resonances 1. Introduction object with a theory based on the restricted three body problem at high eccentricity and inclination. Christou (2000) performed In Morais and Morbidelli (2002), hereafter referred to as a 0.2 Myr integration of the orbits of NEAs in the vicinity of Paper I, we estimated the population of Near Earth Asteroids the terrestrial planets, namely (3362) Khufu, (10563) Izhdubar, (NEAs) that are in the 1:1 mean motion resonance (i.e., are 1994 TF2 and 1989 VA, showing that the first three could be- coorbital1) with the Earth in a steady state scenario where come coorbitals of the Earth while the fourth could become NEAs are constantly being supplied by the main belt sources coorbital of Venus.
    [Show full text]
  • The Formation of the Martian Moons Rosenblatt P., Hyodo R
    The Final Manuscript to Oxford Science Encyclopedia: The formation of the Martian moons Rosenblatt P., Hyodo R., Pignatale F., Trinh A., Charnoz S., Dunseath K.M., Dunseath-Terao M., & Genda H. Summary Almost all the planets of our solar system have moons. Each planetary system has however unique characteristics. The Martian system has not one single big moon like the Earth, not tens of moons of various sizes like for the giant planets, but two small moons: Phobos and Deimos. How did form such a system? This question is still being investigated on the basis of the Earth-based and space-borne observations of the Martian moons and of the more modern theories proposed to account for the formation of other moon systems. The most recent scenario of formation of the Martian moons relies on a giant impact occurring at early Mars history and having also formed the so-called hemispheric crustal dichotomy. This scenario accounts for the current orbits of both moons unlike the scenario of capture of small size asteroids. It also predicts a composition of disk material as a mixture of Mars and impactor materials that is in agreement with remote sensing observations of both moon surfaces, which suggests a composition different from Mars. The composition of the Martian moons is however unclear, given the ambiguity on the interpretation of the remote sensing observations. The study of the formation of the Martian moon system has improved our understanding of moon formation of terrestrial planets: The giant collision scenario can have various outcomes and not only a big moon as for the Earth.
    [Show full text]