Noctuidonema Dibolia N. Sp. (Aphelenchida: Acugutturidae), an Ectoparasite of the Moth Mocis Latipes (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Noctuidonema Dibolia N. Sp. (Aphelenchida: Acugutturidae), an Ectoparasite of the Moth Mocis Latipes (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) 1 Journal of Nematology 27(3):387-394. 1995. © The Society of Nematologists 1995. Noctuidonema dibolia n. sp. (Aphelenchida: Acugutturidae), an Ectoparasite of the moth Mocis latipes (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) 1 O. G. MARTI, JR, AND C, E. ROGERS 2 Abstract: Noctuidonema dibolia n. sp., an ectoparasite of adults of the noctuid moth Mocis latipes (Guen6e) is described. The differentiating characters are a club-shaped body with a subterminal vulva in the female, spicules with a reduced matrix and sheath and closely apposed dorsal and ventral arms in the male, very long styler and conus, moderately prominent stylet knobs, a bluntly rounded head, and a large renette cell in both sexes. Lateral fields, rectum, anus, bursa, and gubernaculum are absent. Noctuidonema dibolia differs from the other species of the subfamily Noc- tuidonematinae in the size and robustness of the body, the length of the stylet and conus, the length of the tail, and the shape of the spicules. Key words: ectoparasite, insect parasite, Lepidoptera, Mocis latipes, moth, nematode, Noctuidae, Noctuidonema dibolia n. sp., taxonomy. Surveys of Lepidoptera in French Gui- MATERIALS AND METHODS ana (9,12), the tropical Americas (11,12), Mocis latipes adults were collected from and the southeastern United States (10) 1991-93 in a walk-in ultraviolet light trap documented the widespread occurrence of located on a research farm near Tifton, an ectoparasitic nematode, Noctuidonema Georgia. The external surfaces of the guyanense Remillet and Silvain, particularly moth abdomens were examined with a ste- among moths in the family Noctuidae. reoscopic microscope for the presence of Noctuidonema Remillet and Silvain is of in- nematodes. Infested moths were placed terest because it is one of only a few known into a 15-ml cup containing 2 ml of water metazoan parasites of adult moths (3) and plus a few drops of Tween 80 (polyoxyeth- is currently under study as a possible bio- ylenesorbitan monooleate) and shaken for logical control agent for the fall armyworm a few seconds to dislodge nematodes. moth, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith), a Nematodes were concentrated by sedi- serious pest of corn, sorghum, and pasture mentation in distilled water, examined live grasses (12,13). or killed in hot water (60 C), and fixed Mocis latipes (Guen6e), whose larvae are and stored in TAF (Triethanolamine-For- known as striped grass loopers, is prima- malin-Water 7:2:91) (4) until processed rily a pest of pasture grasses (5,12). Speci- through an alcohol series to glycerin. The mens of the genus Noctuidonema, collected nematodes were then mounted on glass from M. latipes in Tift County, Georgia, slides and examined with differential in- were examined and found to differ from terference contrast or phase contrast op- N. guyanense, Vampyronema daptria (Ander- tics. Drawings are based on microscopic son and Laumond) (2,7), and the related examination and photographs of living as genus Acugutturus Hunt (6), and are here well as processed specimens. Values in the described as a new species, N. dibolia. The text are expressed as: range in p~m (mean specific name 'dibolia' is taken from Greek in txm -+ SD). (= pointed at both ends). SYSTEMATICS Received for publication 19 September 1994. i Mention of a trade name, warranty, proprietary product, Noctuidonema dibolia n. sp. or vendor does not constitute an endorsement of a product and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other (Figs. 1A-C;2A-E) products or vendors that may also be suitable. Microbiologist and Research Entomologist, USDA, ARS, Holotype ~emale): Length = 522 Ixm; Insect Biology and Population Management Research Labo- maximum width = 57 Ixm; width at vulva ratory, P.O. Box 748, Georgia Coastal Plain Experiment Sta- tion, Tifton, GA 31793. = 44 i~m; anterior end to excretory pore 387 ..................................... [I ........................... I ..................... I 388 Journal of Nematology, Volume 27, No. 3, September 1995 = 22 ixm; anterior end to nerve ring = 16 ~m; anterior end to excretory pore = 137 Ixm; stylet length = 108 ~m; styler co- 25 >m; anterior end to nerve ring = 118 nus length = 91 p.m; metacorpus length ~m; stylet length = 89 p.m; stylet conus = 28 Ixm; metacorpus width = 23 ~xm; length = 73 Ixm; metacorpus length = 28 ovary length = 225 p.m; tail length = 66 Ixm; metacorpus width = 20 p~m; testis /~m. length = 225 p~m; tail length = 8 jxm; Allo~pe (male): Length = 464 p~m; max- spicule length = 44 Ixm; rostrum length = imum width = 41 ixm; width at cloaca = 12 ~xm. 7( 5( 2 / Flo. 1. Noctuidonemadibolia n. sp. A) Female. B) Male. C) Spicules. Noctuidonema dibolia n. sp.: Marti and Rogers 389 a ~ C /V ~ ii ', 60um A 10urn B 10um C ,25urn D 30um E FIG. 2. Noctuidonemadibolia n. sp. A) Fourth-stagejuvenile. B) Head end of female. C) Head end of male. D) Newly hatched second-stagejuvenile. E) Embryonatedegg with fully formed juvenile. Paratypes: Measurements of 39 females 0.2) at midbody, anastomoses common. and 16 males in Tables 1-4. Lateral fields absent. Lip region low, bluntly rounded, not strongly set off. Description Styler flexible, delicate, elongate, repre- Female: Measurements in Tables 1-3. senting 19-22% of total body length. Co- Body club-like, slightly arcuate ventrally. nus representing 80-82% of total stylet Annules continuous, 1.0-1.6 wide (1.3 -+ length. Conus midpoint diameter 0.8-1.0 390 Journal of Nematology, Volume 27, No. 3, September 1995 TABLE 1. Measurements of 14 small paratype ing on host diet, containing amorphous in- (<500 p.m body length), non-gravid female Noctui- gesta, crystalline inclusions, and bacteria. donema dibolia n. sp. from Tift County, Georgia. Intestine ending in a blind, rounded sac Character ~ Mean SD Range extending posterior to vulva. Esophageal glands 45.3-65.7 long (59.7 +- 6.1) in small Measurements (p,m) non-gravid females, 43.8-77.4 long (66.7 Body length 455 37.2 396-495 Maximum body width 54 7.3 44-67 -+ 8.8) in large non-gravid females, and Body width at nerve ring 36 3.1 32-41 62.8-81.8 (72.8 +- 6.8) in large gravid fe- Body width at vulva 41 5.9 34-54 males. Body width at anterior 36 3.1 32-41 Ovary outstretched, .rarely reflexed, fre- end of intestine Anterior end to base 120 9.8 105-140 quently extending anterior to metacorpus of bulb in large specimens. Rachis present in large Metacorpus length 27 2.0 23-31 specimens. Oocytes progressively larger in Metacorpus width 23 1.8 20-26 posterior ovary, usually not more than one Excretory pore to 18 2.9 15-23 anterior end Stylet total length 99 6.1 83-108 TABLE 2. Measurements of 13 large paratype Stylet conus length 81 5.3 69-89 (>500 ~m body length), non-gravid female Noctui- Stylet shaftqength 18 3.0 15-23 donema dibolia n. sp. from Tiff County, Georgia. Head width 9 0.8 7-10 Head length 4 0.5 3-4 Character a Mean SD Range Ovary length 200 37.4 149-262 Vulva to end of tail 53 7.4 42-70 Measurements (~m) Vulva to anterior end 402 33.4 346-433 Body length 526 25.7 501-568 Vagina depth 24 4.1 18-31 Maximum body width 57 6.6 44---67 Anterior end to 129 25.4 85-187 Body width at nerve ring 36 4.6 28--44 anterior ovary Body width at vulva 44 6.7 32-54 Body width at anterior 36 5.3 26~4 Ratios and Percentages end of intestine a 8.5 0.7 7-10 Anterior end to bulb base 125 13.6 96-143 b 3.8 0.4 3-5 Metacorpus length 28 2.8 20-31 c 8.6 1.0 7-11 Metacorpus width 24 1.9 20-26 c' 1.3 0.2 1-2 Excretory pore to 19 2.5 15-23 V 88.3 1.3 86-91 anterior end M 82.0 2.6 76-86 Stylet total length 100 6.8 92-114 G 59.7 6.8 48-70 Stylet conus length 81 4.6 73-88 Ovary, % of body length 43.7 5.9 36-53 Head width 9 0.9 7-10 Stylet, % of body length 21.8 2.3 17-26 Head length 4 1.3 3-7 a a = body length/greatest body width; b = body length/ Ovary length 214 54.3 117-306 distance from anterior end to junction of esophagus and in- Vulva to end of tail 62 8.7 47-79 testine; c = body length/tail length; c' = tail length/body Vulva to anterior end 467 23.8 435-505 width at vulva; V = distance of vulva from anterior end x Vagina depth 27 5.4 15-34 100/body length; M = conus length x 100/styletlength; G = Anterior end to 136 28.6 67-175 distance from vulva to anterior end of ovary x 100/body anterior ovary length. Ratios and Percentages a 9.3 1.0 8-11 (1.0 -+ 0.1). Shaft diameter 1.0-1.6 (1.4 + b 4.2 0.4 4-5 0.3). Styler knobs rounded with concave c 8.7 1.1 7-11 anterior surfaces, 4.0-5.0 (4.6 + 0.4) wide, c' 1.5 0.3 1-2 V 88.7 1.8 86-92 6.0-20.0 (12.9 ± 4.9) from guide ring. M 81.1 4.7 73-89 Procorpus strongly reflexed at level of G 62.6 5.6 54-75 metacorpus when stylet is retracted.
Recommended publications
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Survey of Four Longleaf Pine Preserves
    A SURVEY OF THE MOTHS, BUTTERFLIES, AND GRASSHOPPERS OF FOUR NATURE CONSERVANCY PRESERVES IN SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA Stephen P. Hall and Dale F. Schweitzer November 15, 1993 ABSTRACT Moths, butterflies, and grasshoppers were surveyed within four longleaf pine preserves owned by the North Carolina Nature Conservancy during the growing season of 1991 and 1992. Over 7,000 specimens (either collected or seen in the field) were identified, representing 512 different species and 28 families. Forty-one of these we consider to be distinctive of the two fire- maintained communities principally under investigation, the longleaf pine savannas and flatwoods. An additional 14 species we consider distinctive of the pocosins that occur in close association with the savannas and flatwoods. Twenty nine species appear to be rare enough to be included on the list of elements monitored by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (eight others in this category have been reported from one of these sites, the Green Swamp, but were not observed in this study). Two of the moths collected, Spartiniphaga carterae and Agrotis buchholzi, are currently candidates for federal listing as Threatened or Endangered species. Another species, Hemipachnobia s. subporphyrea, appears to be endemic to North Carolina and should also be considered for federal candidate status. With few exceptions, even the species that seem to be most closely associated with savannas and flatwoods show few direct defenses against fire, the primary force responsible for maintaining these communities. Instead, the majority of these insects probably survive within this region due to their ability to rapidly re-colonize recently burned areas from small, well-dispersed refugia.
    [Show full text]
  • New Synonymies and Combinations in Argyrostrotis Hübner
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 149: 107–116 (2011)New synonymies and combinations in Argyrostrotis Hübner... 107 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.149.2347 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research New synonymies and combinations in Argyrostrotis Hübner (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Erebinae, Poaphilini) J. Bolling Sullivan1, J. Donald Lafontaine2 1 200 Craven St., Beaufort, North Carolina 28516 USA 2 Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arach- nids, and Nematodes, Biodiversity Program, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, K.W. Neatby Bldg., 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6 Corresponding author: J. Bolling Sullivan ([email protected]), J. Donald Lafontaine ([email protected]) Academic editor: C. Schmidt | Received 26 March 2011 | Accepted 4 October 2011 | Published 24 November 2011 Citation: Sullivan JB, Lafontaine JD (2011) New synonymies and combinations in Argyrostrotis Hübner (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Erebinae, Poaphilini). In: Schmidt BC, Lafontaine JD (Eds) Contributions to the systematics of New World macro-moths III. ZooKeys 149: 107–116. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.149.2347 Abstract After examining the type specimens of species in the eastern North American genus Argyrostrotis the number of known species in the genus is reduced from 10 to six through synonymy. A key to species is included along with illustrations of the adults and genitalia of each species. Three Neotropical species currently included in Argyrostrotis (Argyrostrotis eurysaces Schaus, 1914; Argyrostrotis quadrata Dognin, 1910; and Celiptera surrufula Dyar, 1913) are transferred to other genera as Argyrosticta eurysaces (Schaus, 1914), comb. n. [Noctuidae: Bagisarinae], Heterochroma quadrata (Dognin, 1910), comb. n. [Noctuidae: Amphipyrinae], and Ptichodis surrufula (Dyar, 1913), comb.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Ecological Potential of Plum Island, New York
    Biodiversity and ecological potential of Plum Island, New York New York Natural Heritage Program i New York Natural Heritage Program The New York Natural Heritage Program The NY Natural Heritage Program is a partnership NY Natural Heritage has developed two notable between the NYS Department of Environmental online resources: Conservation Guides include the Conservation (NYS DEC) and The Nature Conservancy. biology, identification, habitat, and management of many Our mission is to facilitate conservation of rare animals, of New York’s rare species and natural community rare plants, and significant ecosystems. We accomplish this types; and NY Nature Explorer lists species and mission by combining thorough field inventories, scientific communities in a specified area of interest. analyses, expert interpretation, and the most comprehensive NY Natural Heritage also houses iMapInvasives, an database on New York's distinctive biodiversity to deliver online tool for invasive species reporting and data the highest quality information for natural resource management. planning, protection, and management. In 1990, NY Natural Heritage published Ecological NY Natural Heritage was established in 1985 and is a Communities of New York State, an all inclusive contract unit housed within NYS DEC’s Division of classification of natural and human-influenced Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources. The program is communities. From 40,000-acre beech-maple mesic staffed by more than 25 scientists and specialists with forests to 40-acre maritime beech forests, sea-level salt expertise in ecology, zoology, botany, information marshes to alpine meadows, our classification quickly management, and geographic information systems. became the primary source for natural community NY Natural Heritage maintains New York’s most classification in New York and a fundamental reference comprehensive database on the status and location of for natural community classifications in the northeastern rare species and natural communities.
    [Show full text]
  • CHECKLIST of WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea)
    WISCONSIN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY SPECIAL PUBLICATION No. 6 JUNE 2018 CHECKLIST OF WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea) Leslie A. Ferge,1 George J. Balogh2 and Kyle E. Johnson3 ABSTRACT A total of 1284 species representing the thirteen families comprising the present checklist have been documented in Wisconsin, including 293 species of Geometridae, 252 species of Erebidae and 584 species of Noctuidae. Distributions are summarized using the six major natural divisions of Wisconsin; adult flight periods and statuses within the state are also reported. Examples of Wisconsin’s diverse native habitat types in each of the natural divisions have been systematically inventoried, and species associated with specialized habitats such as peatland, prairie, barrens and dunes are listed. INTRODUCTION This list is an updated version of the Wisconsin moth checklist by Ferge & Balogh (2000). A considerable amount of new information from has been accumulated in the 18 years since that initial publication. Over sixty species have been added, bringing the total to 1284 in the thirteen families comprising this checklist. These families are estimated to comprise approximately one-half of the state’s total moth fauna. Historical records of Wisconsin moths are relatively meager. Checklists including Wisconsin moths were compiled by Hoy (1883), Rauterberg (1900), Fernekes (1906) and Muttkowski (1907). Hoy's list was restricted to Racine County, the others to Milwaukee County. Records from these publications are of historical interest, but unfortunately few verifiable voucher specimens exist. Unverifiable identifications and minimal label data associated with older museum specimens limit the usefulness of this information. Covell (1970) compiled records of 222 Geometridae species, based on his examination of specimens representing at least 30 counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas
    Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas Neal L. Evenhuis, Lucius G. Eldredge, Keith T. Arakaki, Darcy Oishi, Janis N. Garcia & William P. Haines Pacific Biological Survey, Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817 Final Report November 2010 Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Islands Fish & Wildlife Office Honolulu, Hawaii Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 2 BISHOP MUSEUM The State Museum of Natural and Cultural History 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai’i 96817–2704, USA Copyright© 2010 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America Contribution No. 2010-015 to the Pacific Biological Survey Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 5 Background ..................................................................................................................... 7 General History .............................................................................................................. 10 Previous Expeditions to Pagan Surveying Terrestrial Arthropods ................................ 12 Current Survey and List of Collecting Sites .................................................................. 18 Sampling Methods ......................................................................................................... 25 Survey Results ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Native Grasses Benefit Butterflies and Moths Diane M
    AFNR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE Native Grasses Benefit Butterflies and Moths Diane M. Narem and Mary H. Meyer more than three plant families (Bernays & NATIVE GRASSES AND LEPIDOPTERA Graham 1988). Native grasses are low maintenance, drought Studies in agricultural and urban landscapes tolerant plants that provide benefits to the have shown that patches with greater landscape, including minimizing soil erosion richness of native species had higher and increasing organic matter. Native grasses richness and abundance of butterflies (Ries also provide food and shelter for numerous et al. 2001; Collinge et al. 2003) and butterfly species of butterfly and moth larvae. These and moth larvae (Burghardt et al. 2008). caterpillars use the grasses in a variety of ways. Some species feed on them by boring into the stem, mining the inside of a leaf, or IMPORTANCE OF LEPIDOPTERA building a shelter using grass leaves and silk. Lepidoptera are an important part of the ecosystem: They are an important food source for rodents, bats, birds (particularly young birds), spiders and other insects They are pollinators of wild ecosystems. Terms: Lepidoptera - Order of insects that includes moths and butterflies Dakota skipper shelter in prairie dropseed plant literature review – a scholarly paper that IMPORTANT OF NATIVE PLANTS summarizes the current knowledge of a particular topic. Native plant species support more native graminoid – herbaceous plant with a grass-like Lepidoptera species as host and food plants morphology, includes grasses, sedges, and rushes than exotic plant species. This is partially due to the host-specificity of many species richness - the number of different species Lepidoptera that have evolved to feed on represented in an ecological community, certain species, genus, or families of plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Merrimac Farm WMA Insect List As of September 2014 Order Family
    Merrimac Farm WMA Insect List as of September 2014 Order Family Common Name Scientific Name Acari Ixodidae American Dog Tick Dermacentor variabilis Araneae Anyphaenidae Ghost Spider Hibana sp. Araneae Araneidae Larinia directa Larinia directa Araneae Araneidae Star-bellied Orbweaver Acanthepeira stellata Araneae Araneidae White Micrathena Micrathena mitrata Araneae Araneidae Spined Micrathena Micrathena gracilis Araneae Lycosidae Wolf Spider Hogna sp. Araneae Lycosidae Thin-legged Wolf Spider Pardosa sp. Araneae Lycosidae Rabid Wolf Spider Rabidosa rabida Araneae Oxyopidae Lynx Spider Oxyopes aglossus Araneae Salticidae Jumping Spider Pelegrina proterva? Araneae Salticidae Jumping Spider Phidippus princeps Araneae Salticidae Jumping Spider Tutellina elegans Araneae Salticidae Peppered Jumper Pelegrina galathea Araneae Thomisidae Northern Crab Spider Mecaphesa asperata Araneae Thomisidae Swift Crab Spider Mecaphesa celer Araneae Thomisidae White-banded Crab Spider Misumenoides formosipes Blattodea Cryptocercidae Brown-hooded Cockroach Cryptocercus punctulatus Coleoptera Cantharidae Margined Leatherwing Chauliognathus marginatus Coleoptera Cantharidae Soldier Beetle Podabrus rugosulus Coleoptera Carabidae Vivid Metallic Ground Beetle Chlaenius sp. Coleoptera Carabidae Vivid Metallic Ground Beetle Chlaenius emarginatus Coleoptera Carabidae Six-spotted Tiger Beetle Cicindela sexguttata Coleoptera Cerambycidae Flower Longhorn Beetle Strangalia luteicornis Coleoptera Cerambycidae Locust Borer Megacyllene robiniae Coleoptera Cerambycidae Red
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Biodiversity Assessment of REPUBLIC of NAURU
    RAPID BIODIVERSITY ASSESSMENT OF REPUBLIC OF NAURU JUNE 2013 NAOERO GO T D'S W I LL FIRS SPREP Library/IRC Cataloguing-in-Publication Data McKenna, Sheila A, Butler, David J and Wheatley, Amanda. Rapid biodiversity assessment of Republic of Nauru / Sheila A. McKeena … [et al.] – Apia, Samoa : SPREP, 2015. 240 p. cm. ISBN: 978-982-04-0516-5 (print) 978-982-04-0515-8 (ecopy) 1. Biodiversity conservation – Nauru. 2. Biodiversity – Assessment – Nauru. 3. Natural resources conservation areas - Nauru. I. McKeena, Sheila A. II. Butler, David J. III. Wheatley, Amanda. IV. Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) V. Title. 333.959685 © SPREP 2015 All rights for commercial / for profit reproduction or translation, in any form, reserved. SPREP authorises the partial reproduction or translation of this material for scientific, educational or research purposes, provided that SPREP and the source document are properly acknowledged. Permission to reproduce the document and / or translate in whole, in any form, whether for commercial / for profit or non-profit purposes, must be requested in writing. Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme P.O. Box 240, Apia, Samoa. Telephone: + 685 21929, Fax: + 685 20231 www.sprep.org The Pacific environment, sustaining our livelihoods and natural heritage in harmony with our cultures. RAPID BIODIVERSITY ASSESSMENT OF REPUBLIC OF NAURU SHEILA A. MCKENNA, DAVID J. BUTLER, AND AmANDA WHEATLEY (EDITORS) NAOERO GO T D'S W I LL FIRS CONTENTS Organisational Profiles 4 Authors and Participants 6 Acknowledgements
    [Show full text]
  • Moths of Trinity River National Wildlife Refuge
    U.S. FishFish & & Wildlife Wildlife Service Service Moths of Trinity River National Wildlife Refuge Established in 1994, the 25,000-acre Givira arbeloides Trinity River National Wildlife Refuge Prionoxystus robiniae is a remnant of what was once a much Carpenterworm Moth larger, frequently flooded, bottomland hardwood forest. You are still able to Crambid Snout Moths (Crambidae) view vast expanses of ridge and swale Achyra rantalis floodplain features, numerous bayous, Garden Webworm Moth oxbow lakes, and cypress/tupelo swamps Aethiophysa invisalis along the Trinity River. It is one of Argyria lacteella only 14 priority-one bottomland sites Milky Urola Moth identified for protection in the Texas Carectocultus perstrialis Bottomland Protection Plan. Texas is Reed-boring Crambid Moth home to an estimated 4,000 species of Chalcoela iphitalis moths. Most of the nearly 400 species of Sooty-winged Chalcoela moths listed below were photographed Chrysendeton medicinalis around the security lights at the Refuge Bold Medicine Moth Headquarters building located adjacent Colomychus talis to a bottomland hardwood forest. Many Distinguished Colomychus more moths are not even attracted to Conchylodes ovulalis lights, so additional surveys will need Zebra Conchylodes to be conducted to document those Crambus agitatellus species. These forests also support a Double-banded Grass-veneer wide diversity of mammals, reptiles, Crambus satrapellus amphibians, and fish with many feeding Crocidophora tuberculalis on moths or their larvae. Pale-winged Crocidophora Moth Desmia funeralis For more information, visit our website: Grape leaf-folder www.fws.gov/southwest Desmia subdivisalis Diacme elealis Contact the Refuge staff if you should Paler Diacme Moth find an unlisted or rare species during Diastictis fracturalis your visit and provide a description.
    [Show full text]
  • Species List for Garey Park-Inverts
    Species List for Garey Park-Inverts Category Order Family Scientific Name Common Name Abundance Category Order Family Scientific Name Common Name Abundance Arachnid Araneae Agelenidae Funnel Weaver Common Arachnid Araneae Thomisidae Misumena vatia Goldenrod Crab Spider Common Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Araneus miniatus Black-Spotted Orbweaver Rare Arachnid Araneae Thomisidae Misumessus oblongus American Green Crab Spider Common Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Argiope aurantia Yellow Garden Spider Common Arachnid Araneae Uloboridae Uloborus glomosus Featherlegged Orbweaver Uncommon Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Argiope trifasciata Banded Garden Spider Uncommon Arachnid Endeostigmata Eriophyidae Aceria theospyri Persimmon Leaf Blister Gall Rare Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Gasteracantha cancriformis Spinybacked Orbweaver Common Arachnid Endeostigmata Eriophyidae Aculops rhois Poison Ivy Leaf Mite Common Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Gea heptagon Heptagonal Orbweaver Rare Arachnid Ixodida Ixodidae Amblyomma americanum Lone Star Tick Rare Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Larinioides cornutus Furrow Orbweaver Common Arachnid Ixodida Ixodidae Dermacentor variabilis American Dog Tick Common Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Mangora gibberosa Lined Orbweaver Uncommon Arachnid Opiliones Sclerosomatidae Leiobunum vittatum Eastern Harvestman Uncommon Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Mangora placida Tuft-legged Orbweaver Uncommon Arachnid Trombidiformes Anystidae Whirligig Mite Rare Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Mecynogea lemniscata Basilica Orbweaver Rare Arachnid Eumesosoma roeweri
    [Show full text]
  • Results of a Fall and Spring Bioblitz at Grassy Pond Recreational Area, Lowndes County, Georgia
    Georgia Journal of Science Volume 77 No. 2 Scholarly Contributions from the Membership and Others Article 17 2019 Results of a Fall and Spring BioBlitz at Grassy Pond Recreational Area, Lowndes County, Georgia. Emily Cantonwine Valdosta State University, [email protected] James Nienow Valdosta State University, [email protected] Mark Blackmore Valdosta State University, [email protected] Brandi Griffin Valdosta State University, [email protected] Brad Bergstrom Valdosta State University, [email protected] See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.gaacademy.org/gjs Part of the Biodiversity Commons Recommended Citation Cantonwine, Emily; Nienow, James; Blackmore, Mark; Griffin, andi;Br Bergstrom, Brad; Bechler, David; Henkel, Timothy; Slaton, Christopher A.; Adams, James; Grupe, Arthur; Hodges, Malcolm; and Lee, Gregory (2019) "Results of a Fall and Spring BioBlitz at Grassy Pond Recreational Area, Lowndes County, Georgia.," Georgia Journal of Science, Vol. 77, No. 2, Article 17. Available at: https://digitalcommons.gaacademy.org/gjs/vol77/iss2/17 This Research Articles is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ the Georgia Academy of Science. It has been accepted for inclusion in Georgia Journal of Science by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ the Georgia Academy of Science. Results of a Fall and Spring BioBlitz at Grassy Pond Recreational Area, Lowndes County, Georgia. Acknowledgements We would like to thank the following scientists,
    [Show full text]