DOCSLIB.ORG

Walter Grunden on Fallen Astronauts: Heroes Who Died

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Walter Grunden on Fallen Astronauts: Heroes Who Died Colin Burgess, Kate Doolan, Bert Vis. Fallen Astronauts: Heroes Who Died Reaching for the Moon, Revised Edition. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2016. 416 pp. $36.95, cloth, ISBN 978-0-8032-8509-5. Reviewed by Walter E. Grunden Published on H-FedHist (October, 2017) Commissioned by Caryn E. Neumann (Miami University of Ohio Regionals) During the Apollo 15 mission, in early August balanced, with about thirty to forty pages dedicat‐ 1971, two astronauts placed a plaque and a small ed to each astronaut. The Apollo 1 accident, which tin fgurine on the surface of the moon to memori‐ resulted in the tragic deaths of Virgil “Gus” Gris‐ alize those who had perished in the attempt to get som, Ed White, and Roger Chaffee, receives the there. The plaque bore the names of US astro‐ most attention with nearly a hundred pages, nauts and Soviet cosmonauts alike, including: the while the eight Soviet cosmonauts are discussed Americans Charles A. Bassett, Roger B. Chaffee, in less than ffty, which may be understandable Theodore C. Freeman, Edward G. Givens, Jr., Virgil given the greater challenges of obtaining primary I. Grissom, Elliot M. See, Jr., Edward H. White, and source material from Russian archives. Several Clifton C. Williams, Jr., and the Russians Pavel photographs are included of the astronauts and Belyayev, Georgy Dobrovolsky, Yuri Gagarin, give the reader a face to remember with the Vladimir Komarov, Viktor Patsayev, and Val‐ name. adislav Volkov. The names Valentin Bondarenko As a tribute to these fallen heroes and pio‐ and Grigori Nelyubov were not included on the neers of space exploration, this book is a welcome plaque, as the circumstances of their deaths re‐ addition to the vast literature on the US space pro‐ mained uncertain at the time, but their stories are gram and the “space race” in general. Apart from included in this collection of biographies written those who perished in the Apollo 1 accident and to commemorate the lives of these “handful of Yuri Gagarin, who gained fame as the frst man in men who died reaching for their ultimate goal-- space, many of the principals are not household the moon” (p. xxv). names, and it is only ftting that they be recog‐ The book is divided into six main chapters, nized and their sacrifices recorded for posterity. five of which are dedicated to a narrative recon‐ The authors should be commended for shedding struction of the tragic incidents that took the lives more light on these lesser-known heroes. of the Americans, and one devoted collectively to That said, the book is not without its faws. the Soviets. Written largely in biographical style, Targeted at a general audience rather than a more the book meticulously details the lives, careers, specialized academic readership, the book’s nar‐ and deaths of the principals in the chronological rative style trades scholarly reliability for read‐ order of their passing. The coverage is fairly well ability, and the prose often tends toward the cre‐ H-Net Reviews atively descriptive, like a novel, such as recount‐ among the many anecdotes here, and there are no ing a principal’s thoughts or emotions on a partic‐ substantive arguments developed throughout. ular occasion, something that could only be Such issues should give a university press known from an interview or memoir, or a compa‐ pause when deciding to publish for a wider audi‐ rable source. For example, in the chapter on Free‐ ence. Given the challenge of selling academic man, the authors present an anecdote about his books and the declining readership of print media wife’s curious and superstitious habit of shouting over all, however, it is an understandable busi‐ “Rabbit!” on the frst day of each month to bring ness decision. But blurring the lines between pro‐ good luck, and the pilot’s thinking of it as he tax‐ fessional and popular history comes with a cost ied out for a fight: “Suddenly a funny little for both publishers and scholars alike. thought tweaked at his memory and made him This is the second edition of this book, with a smile” (p. 6). Such emotive passages are not inher‐ full decade having passed since the publication of ently problematic in themselves, but many go the frst. The authors should be commended for without attribution, and without a single formal committing themselves to additional research and citation in the entire book, one is more often than for dedicating more effort to this topic. While the not left to guess the source or simply to contem‐ emotional appeal of the book is obvious, and the plate how the authors could know such a thing. tribute to these heroes well deserved, in this re‐ This is unfortunate, because the authors conduct‐ viewer’s opinion, the book still falls short of the ed extensive research for the book, including nu‐ treatment these heroes are due. Perhaps the third merous interviews. But substance is often buried edition could tell us more about the back story of by style here. The bibliography doesn’t help much the plaque itself, and give fewer prurient details either, as it does not separate primary from sec‐ of the lives that these heroes and their families ondary sources, nor does it provide a list of inter‐ might wish to keep to themselves. viewees for quick or easy verification, and one of‐ ten has to search for or guess at attribution. This reviewer also found some of the authors’ editorial decisions questionable. Biography is not as easy to write as it may seem, but simply includ‐ ing more details of a person’s life doesn’t neces‐ sarily make a biography better. In every chapter there are extraneous details that do not add sub‐ stantively to our understanding of the principal, nor do they necessarily move the narrative along. In some cases, the inclusion of certain details feels downright voyeuristic, such as with the vivid de‐ scription of Bondarenko’s slow death by burning (pp. 233-234), or one of the American astronaut’s widows going on to remarry several times before succumbing to a slow, horrible death from mouth and lung cancer. Why do we need to know this, and how does it honor the heroes of this book? Se‐ rious scholars will also fnd no central thesis 2 H-Net Reviews If there is additional discussion of this review, you may access it through the network, at https://networks.h-net.org/h-fedhist Citation: Walter E. Grunden. Review of Burgess, Colin; Doolan, Kate; Vis, Bert. Fallen Astronauts: Heroes Who Died Reaching for the Moon, Revised Edition. H-FedHist, H-Net Reviews. October, 2017. URL: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=49501 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Apollo Spacecraft
    APOLLO NEWS REFERENCE APOLLO SPACECRAFT The Apollo spacecraft comprises the lunar occupies the right flight station. The astronauts module, the command module, theservice module, transfer to the ascent stage, through the docking the spacecraft-lunar module adapter, and the tunne l, after the LM has docked with the CM and launch escape system. The five parts, 82 feet tall both have attained lunar orbit. The ascent stage when assembled, are carried atop the launch comprises three major areas: crew compartment, vehicle. midsection, and aft equipment bay. The cabin, comprising the crew compartment and midsection, After the launch escape system and the launch has an overa ll volume of 235 cubic feet. vehicle have been jettisoned, the three modu les remain to form the basic spacecraft. The command module carries the three astronauts to and from Because the LM is operated in either the weight­ lunar orbit. The service modu le contains the pro­ lessness of space or in lunar gravity, the cabin pulsion system that propels the spacecraft during contains harness- like restraint equipment rather the trans lunar and transearth flights. The lunar than the foldable couches provided in the CM. The module carries two astronauts, the Commander restraints al low the astronauts sufficient freedom and the Lunar Module Pilot, to and from the of movement to operate al l LM controls while in a moon, and serves as the base of operations during re lativelyupright position. the lunar stay. LUNAR MODULE The lunar module wil l be operated in the vacuum of space; there was no need, therefore,for it to have the aerodynamic symmetry of the com· mand module.
    [Show full text]
  • The Space Race
    The Space Race Aims: To arrange the key events of the “Space Race” in chronological order. To decide which country won the Space Race. Space – the Final Frontier “Space” is everything Atmosphere that exists outside of our planet’s atmosphere. The atmosphere is the layer of Earth gas which surrounds our planet. Without it, none of us would be able to breathe! Space The sun is a star which is orbited (circled) by a system of planets. Earth is the third planet from the sun. There are nine planets in our solar system. How many of the other eight can you name? Neptune Saturn Mars Venus SUN Pluto Uranus Jupiter EARTH Mercury What has this got to do with the COLD WAR? Another element of the Cold War was the race to control the final frontier – outer space! Why do you think this would be so important? The Space Race was considered important because it showed the world which country had the best science, technology, and economic system. It would prove which country was the greatest of the superpowers, the USSR or the USA, and which political system was the best – communism or capitalism. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvaEvCNZymo The Space Race – key events Discuss the following slides in your groups. For each slide, try to agree on: • which of the three options is correct • whether this was an achievement of the Soviet Union (USSR) or the Americans (USA). When did humans first send a satellite into orbit around the Earth? 1940s, 1950s or 1960s? Sputnik 1 was launched in October 1957.
    [Show full text]
  • The First In-Flight Space Fatality
    Quiz #001 Difficulty: Medium The First In-Flight Space Fatality 1. Which mission had the first in-flight 8. Which pilot was the mission backup? space fatality? A) Vladimir Titov S A) Soyuz-1 B) Yuri Gagarin B) Space Shuttle Challenger C) Sergei Gonchar C) Apollo13 P 9. Where was Col. Komarov buried? A 2. How old was Colonel Vladimir A) On a hill overlooking Moscow Komarov at the time of this mission? B) In a wall at the Kremlin C A) 30 C) At an undisclosed location B) 35 E C) 40 Answers: 3. Why did the mission fail? 1. (A) The mission took place April 23-24, A) The oxygen tank exploded 1967, and killed the pilot and only crew H B) The parachute did not open member, Colonel Vladimir Komarov. C) The heat shield was damaged 2. (C) I 3. (B) The main parachute did not release 4. What was the pilot doing minutes and the manually-deployed reserve chute S tangled with the main’s drogue. The before the crash? Soyuz-1 descent module hit the ground at T A) Screaming at mission control around 40 meters per second (89mph). B) Saying good-bye to his wife 4. (C) C) Preparing for landing 5. (A) It was the first crewed flight of the O Soyuz launch 7K-OK spacecraft and Soyuz 5. What was the purpose of the flight? rocket. The Soyuz-2 mission was aborted R before launch, after the 13th orbit of A) Dock with another vehicle and Soyuz-1. Y exchange crew in flight 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Details of Yuri Gagarin's Tragic Death Revealed 17 June 2013, by Jason Major
    Details of Yuri Gagarin's tragic death revealed 17 June 2013, by Jason Major later, details about what really happened to cause the death of the first man in space have come out—from the first man to go out on a spacewalk, no less. According to an article published online today on Russia Today (RT.com) former cosmonaut Aleksey Leonov—who performed the first EVA on March 18, 1965—has revealed details about the accident that killed both Yuri Gagarin and his flight instructor Vladimir Seryogin in March 1968. Officially the cause of the crash was said to be the ill-fated result of an attempt to avoid a foreign object during flight training in their MiG-15UTI, a two-seated, dual-controlled training version of the widely-produced Soviet aircraft. "Foreign objects" could be anything, from balloons to flocks of birds to airborne debris to… well, you see where one could go with that. (And over the years many have.) Yuri Gagarin on the way to his historic Vostok launch on April 12, 1961. Credit: NASA Images The maneuver led to the aircraft going into a tailspin and crashing, killing both men. But experienced pilots like Gagarin and Seryogin shouldn't have lost control of their plane like On the morning of April 12, 1961, Soviet that—not according to Leonov, who has been trying cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin lifted off aboard Vostok 1 to release details of the event for the past 20 to become the first human in space, spending 108 years… if only that the pilots' families might know minutes in orbit before landing via parachute in the the truth.
    [Show full text]
  • Apollo 11 Astronaut Neil Armstrong Broadcast from the Moon (July 21, 1969) Added to the National Registry: 2004 Essay by Cary O’Dell
    Apollo 11 Astronaut Neil Armstrong Broadcast from the Moon (July 21, 1969) Added to the National Registry: 2004 Essay by Cary O’Dell “One small step for…” Though no American has stepped onto the surface of the moon since 1972, the exiting of the Earth’s atmosphere today is almost commonplace. Once covered live over all TV and radio networks, increasingly US space launches have been relegated to a fleeting mention on the nightly news, if mentioned at all. But there was a time when leaving the planet got the full attention it deserved. Certainly it did in July of 1969 when an American man, Neil Armstrong, became the first human being to ever step foot on the moon’s surface. The pictures he took and the reports he sent back to Earth stopped the world in its tracks, especially his eloquent opening salvo which became as famous and as known to most citizens as any words ever spoken. The mid-1969 mission of NASA’s Apollo 11 mission became the defining moment of the US- USSR “Space Race” usually dated as the period between 1957 and 1975 when the world’s two superpowers were competing to top each other in technological advances and scientific knowledge (and bragging rights) related to, truly, the “final frontier.” There were three astronauts on the Apollo 11 spacecraft, the US’s fifth manned spaced mission, and the third lunar mission of the Apollo program. They were: Neil Armstrong, Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin, and Michael Collins. The trio was launched from Kennedy Space Center in Florida on July 16, 1969 at 1:32pm.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Lesson Plan: Russian Rocket Ships!
    Engineering Lesson Plan: Russian Rocket Ships! Sputnik, Vostok, Voskhod, and Soyuz Launcher Schematics Uttering the text “rocket ship” can excite, mystify, and inspire young children. A rocket ship can transport people and cargo to places far away with awe-inspiring speed and accuracy. The text “rocket scientist” indexes a highly intelligent and admirable person, someone who is able to create, or assist in the creation of machines, vehicles that can actually leave the world we all call “home.” Rocket scientists possess the knowledge to take human beings and fantastic machines to space. This knowledge is built upon basic scientific principles of motion and form—the understanding, for young learners, of shapes and their function. This lesson uses the shape of a rocket to ignite engineering knowledge and hopefully, inspiration in young pupils and introduces them to a space program on the other side of the world. Did you know that the first person in space, Yuri Gagarin, was from the former Soviet Union? That the Soviet Union (now Russia) sent the first spacecraft, Sputnik I, into Earth’s orbit? That today, American NASA-based astronauts fly to Russia to launch and must learn conversational Russian as part of their training? Now, in 2020, there are Russians and Americans working together in the International Space Station (ISS), the latest brought there by an American-based commercial craft. Being familiar with the contributions Russia (and the former Soviet Union) has made to space travel is an integral part of understanding the ongoing human endeavor to explore the space all around us. After all, Russian cosmonauts use rocket ships too! The following lesson plan is intended for kindergarten students in Indiana to fulfill state engineering learning requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SOVIET MOON PROGRAM in the 1960S, the United States Was Not the Only Country That Was Trying to Land Someone on the Moon and Bring Him Back to Earth Safely
    AIAA AEROSPACE M ICRO-LESSON Easily digestible Aerospace Principles revealed for K-12 Students and Educators. These lessons will be sent on a bi-weekly basis and allow grade-level focused learning. - AIAA STEM K-12 Committee. THE SOVIET MOON PROGRAM In the 1960s, the United States was not the only country that was trying to land someone on the Moon and bring him back to Earth safely. The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, also called the Soviet Union, also had a manned lunar program. This lesson describes some of it. Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS): ● Discipline: Engineering Design ● Crosscutting Concept: Systems and System Models ● Science & Engineering Practice: Constructing Explanations and Designing Solutions GRADES K-2 K-2-ETS1-1. Ask questions, make observations, and gather information about a situation people want to change to define a simple problem that can be solved through the development of a new or improved object or tool. Have you ever been busy doing something when somebody challenges you to a race? If you decide to join the race—and it is usually up to you whether you join or not—you have to stop what you’re doing, get up, and start racing. By the time you’ve gotten started, the other person is often halfway to the goal. This is the sort of situation the Soviet Union found itself in when President Kennedy in 1961 announced that the United States would set a goal of landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to the Earth before the end of the decade.
    [Show full text]
  • The Soviet Moon Program
    The Moon Race [July 1969] – down to the wire! JAMES OBERG JULY 17, 2019 SPACE CENTER HOUSTON APOLLO-11 FIFTIETH ANNIVERSARY WWW.JAMESOBERG.COM [email protected] OVERVIEW– JULY 1969 Unexpected last-minute drama was added to Apollo-11 by the appearance of a robot Soviet moon probe that might have returned lunar samples to Earth just before the astronauts got back. We now know that even more dramatic Soviet moon race efforts were ALSO aimed at upstaging Apollo, hoping it would fail. But it was the Soviet program that failed -- and they did their best to keep it secret. These Soviet efforts underscored their desperation to nullify the worldwide significance of Apollo-11 and its profound positive impact, as JFK had anticipated, on international assessments of the relative US/USSR balance of power across the board -- military, commercial, cultural, technological, economic, ideological, and scientific. These were the biggest stakes in the entire Cold War, whose final outcome hung in the balance depending on the outcome of the July 1969 events in space. On July 13, 1969, three days before Apollo-11, the USSR launched a robot probe to upstage it DAY BEFORE APOLLO-11 LANDING – BOTH SPACECRAFT ORBITING MOON IN CRISS-CROSS ORBITS THE SOVIET PROBE GOT TO THE MOON FIRST & WENT INTO ORBIT AROUND IT AS APOLLO BEGAN ITS MISSION https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/T6UAAOSwDJ9crVLo/s-l1600.jpg https://youtu.be/o16I8S3MMo4 A FEW YEARS LATER, ONCE A NEW MISSION HAD SUCCEEDED, MOSCOW RELEASED DRAWINGS OF THE VEHICLE AND HOW IT OPERATED TO LAND, RETRIEVE SAMPLES, AND RETURN TO EARTH Jodrell Bank radio telescope in Britain told the world about the final phase of the Luna 15 drama, in a news release: "Signals ceased at 4.50 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Gill Arbuthnott • Christopher Nielsen All Rights Reserved
    To David, whose bookshelves introduced me to the rest of the universe through Asimov, Bradbury and Clarke, and who bought me that Bowie record. – GA For Rusty (the first dingo in space). – CN BIG PICTURE PRESS First published in the UK in 2019 by Big Picture Press, an imprint of Bonnier Books UK, The Plaza, 535 King’s Road, London, SW10 0SZ www.templarco.co.uk/big-picture-press www.bonnierbooks.co.uk Text copyright © 2019 by Gill Arbuthnott Illustration copyright © 2019 by Christopher Nielsen Design copyright © 2019 by Big Picture Press 1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2 Gill Arbuthnott • Christopher Nielsen All rights reserved ISBN 978-1-78741-354-2 This book was typeset in Burford Base and Rustic, Futura and Duality The illustrations were created using a combination of traditional and digital techniques. Edited by Katie Haworth Designed by Nathalie Eyraud Production Controller: Nick Read Printed in China ;II 2019: Chinese robotic space probe r e Chang’e-4 makes first ever landing on the 2 a 0 c 1 h 8 e far side of the Moon : s T i h n e t e nturies: e V th c r 16 s – o th t vers e 15 i disco y ile l al l a G a eo g lil the paths r a dict e G pre s r to s p 2 w tile ) a ho ojec s p 6 ) f pr e ce ro o h b 6 6 e s i 6 l 8 : 1 b 6 ( y u 1 r ( y 2012: p TiMeLiNe u The Voyager I probe t i t n n v o n o reaches interstellar space i a t t e r c o w G e h f M t N 7 o f c o 1 a s a w s Is a w r L a i is L S h d n a 15th–16th centuries: Leonardo da Vinci draws designs for flying machines 1986: Russian 2000: International Last Space space station Mir Space Station
    [Show full text]
  • Apollo 7 Mission Report December 1968
    oolt_o,.IoJo Ioeloolo_oIQeieIolo_le= :::::::::::::::::::::::........... MSC-PA-R-68-15 °°,°°,°%=*oQ*.,oI,,,*°io°%%-°°° %Io%%oloooootoolliol "_ NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION :.:,.......... .%%o.'ao.'aoa'.%*e" I .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. ==-..-.-,%,o,=O= °%* :-:':.:.:.:':-:':.:C': t.¢3 ":':':':':':':':':':':" t'_ .'-o%%°..Q.',%.o...'.°•°.%'='• • i ::::::::::::::::::::::: ¢O .:.:.:.:,:.:.:•:.:.:.:, '_ %%%%:::::::::::::::::::::::*:%°...%-.%. APOLLO 7 MISSION REPORT _ i .:•:,:.:':.:.:•:.:.:.:, ,4: ::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::: | o%%%%%°o=o%•o%•o 0 ::::::::::::::::::::::: (/) .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. _ =_iiiiii!_iiiiiiiiiiiiiii ,oO.%Oo%,,o.%,.-.o,- ..,,,,oo,o,. oo.o,,,oo,o•ooo.,,oo,o. ,o,,,,•oo,o oo.°ooo,...o•°.,,,.o,,o • ., .... ,o,.o ,°,,o.,o,,,. •.,,,ooo,oo,,.,,.,,o.,o ::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::: .=%Oo=..=*oO.-.°..=%. ::::::::::::::::::::::: i:i:!:i:!:i:i:i:i:i:i:i ,,,:::::::::::=,o.,,.,. ::::::::::::::::::::::: iii!!iiiiiii!!!!!!!!! .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. • • • • • o_%%%,o• ::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::: • ,,_•o%O_%%,.%o • • ::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::: Oo,o,,O•,,O,Oo%,.,o%• ::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::: DISTRIBUTION AND REFERENCING .,.,,.o.,o, ...oo,o,,,o.%-.-,,°,,,o,oo o=o,.-,, •:.:,:.:,:,:,:.:,:.:.:, This
    [Show full text]
  • From Yuri Gagarin to Apollo-Soyuz
    H-Diplo National Security Archive: U.S.-Soviet Cooperation in Outer Space: From Yuri Gagarin to Apollo-Soyuz Discussion published by Malcolm Byrne on Monday, April 12, 2021 Cold War Rivals Joined Forces after Historic Gagarin Flight in 1961 to Pursue Broader Shared Interests, Documents Show Current Collaboration on International Space Station Has Its Roots in JFK- Khrushchev Meeting of Minds Edited by Sarah Dunn Washington, D.C., April 12, 2021 – Soviet cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin’s historic spaceflight 60 years ago, which made him the first human in space, prompted President John F. Kennedy to advance an unusual proposal – that the two superpowers combine forces to cooperate in space. In a congratulatory letter to Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev, posted today by the nongovernmental National Security Archive, Kennedy expressed the hope that “our nations [can] work together” in the “continuing quest for knowledge of outer space.” Kennedy’s letter is one of many records in the American and Russian archives that show that the two ideological rivals have not only engaged in a space race but have also cooperated for decades. In fact, as the ongoing joint activities involving the International Space Station demonstrate, space has been one of the few spheres of collaboration that have survived the trials and tensions of the Cold War, keeping both countries engaged in constructive competition as well as in joint efforts to expand human frontiers. Today’s posting begins a two-part series exploring this often-overlooked chapter in the relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union, and later Russia. The materials in the first tranche cover events from Gagarin’s flight to the celebrated Apollo-Soyuz mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Skylab: the Human Side of a Scientific Mission
    SKYLAB: THE HUMAN SIDE OF A SCIENTIFIC MISSION Michael P. Johnson, B.A. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2007 APPROVED: J. Todd Moye, Major Professor Alfred F. Hurley, Committee Member Adrian Lewis, Committee Member and Chair of the Department of History Sandra L. Terrell, Dean of the Robert B. Toulouse School of Graduate Studies Johnson, Michael P. Skylab: The Human Side of a Scientific Mission. Master of Arts (History), May 2007, 115pp., 3 tables, references, 104 titles. This work attempts to focus on the human side of Skylab, America’s first space station, from 1973 to 1974. The thesis begins by showing some context for Skylab, especially in light of the Cold War and the “space race” between the United States and the Soviet Union. The development of the station, as well as the astronaut selection process, are traced from the beginnings of NASA. The focus then shifts to changes in NASA from the Apollo missions to Skylab, as well as training, before highlighting the three missions to the station. The work then attempts to show the significance of Skylab by focusing on the myriad of lessons that can be learned from it and applied to future programs. Copyright 2007 by Michael P. Johnson ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not be possible without the help of numerous people. I would like to begin, as always, by thanking my parents. You are a continuous source of help and guidance, and you have never doubted me. Of course I have to thank my brothers and sisters.
    [Show full text]