DOCSLIB.ORG

Review of the National Tuberculosis Programme in the Republic of Moldova, 4–15 February 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Review of the National Tuberculosis Programme in the Republic of Moldova, 4–15 February 2013 The WHO Regional Office for Europe The World Health Organization (WHO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations created in 1948 with the primary responsibility for international health matters and public health. The WHO Regional Office for Europe is one of six regional offices throughout the world, each with its own programme geared to the particular health conditions of the countries it serves. Member States Albania Andorra Armenia Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Georgia Germany Greece Hungary Review of the National Iceland Ireland Israel Tuberculosis Programme Italy Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan in the Republic of Moldova Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Malta 4–15 February 2013 Monaco Montenegro Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Republic of Moldova Romania Russian Federation San Marino Serbia Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Tajikistan The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Turkey Turkmenistan Ukraine United Kingdom Uzbekistan World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe Marmorvej 51, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark WHOLIS number Tel.: +45 45 33 70 00 Fax: +45 45 33 70 01 E-mail: [email protected] Original: English Web site: www.euro.who.int Review of the National Tuberculosis Programme in the Republic of Moldova, 4–15 February 2013 By: Pierpaolo de Colombani, Sevim Ahmedov, Kai Blondal, Silviu Ciobanu, Andrei Dadu, Smiljka de Lussigny, Nigorsulton Muzafarova, Pierre Yves Norval, Cristian Popa, Oriol Ramis, Sabine Ruesh-Gerdes, Jonathan Stillo and Erika Vitek Keywords0B EPIDEMIOLOGY HEALTHCARE ECONOMICS AND ORGANIZATIONS NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS SURVEILLANCE TUBERCULOSIS, MULTI-DRUG RESISTANT TUBERCULOSIS, PULMONARY – prevention and control Address requests about publications of the WHO Regional Office for Europe to: Publications WHO Regional Office for Europe UN City, Marmorvej 51 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Alternatively, complete an online request form for documentation, health information, or for permission to quote or translate, on the Regional Office web site (http://www.euro.who.int/pubrequest). © World Health Organization 2013 All rights reserved. The Regional Office for Europe of the World Health Organization welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use. The views expressed by authors, editors, or expert groups do not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy of the World Health Organization. Review of the National Tuberculosis Programme in the Republic of Moldova, 4–15 February 2013 page iii CONTENTS Page Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................ iv Abbreviations ....................................................................................................................... v Executive summary .............................................................................................................. vi Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 General information .............................................................................................................. 2 TB epidemiology ................................................................................................................... 3 NTP strategies, structure, budget and main achievements ....................................................... 4 Case finding and diagnosis .................................................................................................. 11 Treatment and case management ........................................................................................ 15 TB in children ..................................................................................................................... 21 Drug-resistant TB ............................................................................................................... 23 HIV-related TB.................................................................................................................... 26 TB control in prison ............................................................................................................. 29 Other vulnerable populations and social determinants ........................................................... 33 TB infection control ............................................................................................................. 36 Management of medicines and other commodities ................................................................ 40 Monitoring and evaluation ................................................................................................... 44 Human resources development ............................................................................................ 46 Operational research ........................................................................................................... 47 Ethics and human rights ...................................................................................................... 49 ACSM and community involvement ...................................................................................... 51 Health system and TB control .............................................................................................. 53 References ........................................................................................................................ 62 Annex 1. Roadmap for implementation of review recommendations ....................................... 67 Annex 2. Members of the review team ................................................................................. 72 Annex 3. Programme overview ............................................................................................ 73 Annex 4. Field team programme .......................................................................................... 75 Annex 5. Professionals interviewed ...................................................................................... 77 Annex 6. Profiles of patients interviewed .............................................................................. 83 Review of the National Tuberculosis Programme in the Republic of Moldova, 4–15 February 2013 page iv Acknowledgments The review team members would like to express their gratitude to the Ministry of Health, the National Tuberculosis Institute “Chiril Draganiuc”, the Project Coordination Implementation and Monitoring Unit, the Centre for Health Policies and Studies, the health authorities in the Transnistria region, the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria and Dr Jarno Habicht, WHO Representative in the Republic of Moldova and his office, for making this review possible. We would like to offer special thanks to all the doctors, nurses and patients at the sites visited for their assistance and collaboration. We also extend our appreciation to the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of Labour, Family and Social Affairs and the National Health Insurance Company for their cooperation, as well as to key partners of the National Tuberculosis Programme, such as Act for Involvement and the Soros Foundation – Moldova. Finally, we acknowledge the support given by Dr Hans Kluge during his mission as Director of the Division Health Systems and Public Health of the WHO Regional Office for Europe and Special Representative of the WHO Regional Director to Prevent and Combat M/XDR-TB in the European Region. Review of the National Tuberculosis Programme in the Republic of Moldova, 4–15 February 2013 page v Abbreviations ACSM advocacy, communication and social mobilization AFI Act for Involvement ART antiretroviral therapy BCG Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (vaccine) DOT directly observed treatment DST drug susceptibility testing GDF Global TB Drug Facility GDP gross domestic product Global Fund Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria GLC Green Light Committee HCT HIV counselling and testing IPT isoniazid preventive therapy MDR multidrug-resistant MGIT mycobacteria growth indicator tube NGO nongovernmental organization NHIC National Health Insurance Company NIPP National Tuberculosis Institute “Chiril Draganiuc” NTP National Tuberculosis
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regional Business Environment Development Index 2016
    IDIS Viitorul INEKO Regional Business Environment Development Index 2016 Authors Liubomir Chiriac, PhD, Vice Director IDIS Viitorul Tatiana Lariusin, PhD, Senior Economist, IDIS Viitorul Ion Butmalai, Economist, IDIS Viitorul Peter Golias, PhD, Director, INEKO Official Development Assistance of the Slovak Republic is an intrinsic instrument of the Slovak foreign policy, which to a large extent shapes Slovakia’s relations with aid recipients and relevant international organizations. Having committed itself to the fulfillment of the Millennium Development Goals, Slovakia shares the responsibility for global development and poverty reduction endeavors in developing countries, aiming to promote their sustainable development. INEKO Institute is a non-governmental non-profit organization established in support of economic and social reforms which aim to remove barriers to the long-term positive development of the Slovak economy and society. Mission The Institute’s mission is to support a rational and efficient economic and social reform process in the Slovak Republic (SR), through research, information development and dissemination, advice to senior government, political and selfgoverning officials, and promotion of the public discourse. It also focuses on those areas of social policy on the regional as well as the European level critical to the economic transformation of the SR. It draws on the best experience available from other transition countries and members of the European Union (EU) and the OECD. Regional Business Environment Development Index 2016 Authors Liubomir Chiriac, PhD, Vice Director IDIS Viitorul Tatiana Lariusin, PhD, Senior Economist, IDIS Viitorul IDIS is an independent think tank, established in 1993 as a Ion Butmalai, Economist, IDIS Viitorul research and advocacy think tank, incorporated by Moldovan Peter Golias, PhD, Director, INEKO laws on non-for-profit and NGOs.
    [Show full text]
  • Advancing Democracy and Human Rights PROMO-LEX ASSOCIATION
    advancing democracy and human rights THE CIVIC COALITION FOR FREE AND FAIR ELECTIONS PROMO-LEX ASSOCIATION REPORT #3 Monitoring the preterm parliamentary elections of 28 November 2010 Monitoring period: 26 October 2010 – 8 November 2010 Published on 11 November 2010 Promo-LEX is grateful for the financial and technical assistance offered by the United States of America Embassy in Chisinau, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), and the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI). The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of the donors. Page 1 of 28 Third monitoring report on the preterm parliamentary elections of 28 November 2010 CONTENTS: I. SUMMARY II. PROMO-LEX MONITORING EFFORT III. INTRODUCTION A. Legal framework B. Electoral competitors C. Election authorities D. Local authorities E. Electoral campaigning F. Financial analysis G. Mass media H. National and international observers I. Transnistrian region IV. CONCERNS V. RECOMMENDATIONS Page 2 of 28 I. SUMMARY This report, covering the period from October 25 through November 8, 2010, describes the electoral environment and reviews from a legal perspective the recent developments in the election campaign, and the performance of the electoral competitors and of the local and election authorities. The election campaign is becoming increasingly intense, with cases of intimidation and abuse being registered both against electoral competitors and voters. While engaged in various campaigning activities, some candidates resort to the misuse of administrative resources and offering of “electoral gifts”. Promo-LEX salutes the impartiality of the election authorities in performing their duties. The Central Election Commission registered until the end of the authorization period 40 electoral competitors and issued warnings to the contenders that violated the rules.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Moldova
    EVALUATION REPORT REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA G R E T A Group of Experts on Action against Third evaluation round Trafficking in Human Beings Access to justice and effective remedies for victims of trafficking in human beings GRETA(2020)11 Publication: 3 December 2020 Secretariat of the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings (GRETA and Committee of the Parties) Council of Europe F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex France [email protected] www.coe.int/en/web/anti-human-trafficking 2 GRETA(2020)11 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Contents Executive summary ................................................................................................................ 3 Preamble ................................................................................................................................ 5 I. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 6 II. Overview of the current situation and trends in the area of trafficking in human beings in the Republic of Moldova ..................................................................................................... 8 III. Developments in the legislative, institutional and policy framework for action against human trafficking ................................................................................................................... 9 IV. Access to justice and effective remedies for victims of human trafficking
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Moldova [Energy Profile]
    UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Energy Efficiency 21 Programme Republic of Moldova [Energy Profile] Project Number: ECE/GC/2008/033 Project Title: Financing Energy Efficiency Investments for Climate Change Mitigation Submitted to: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Submitted by: National Participating Institution / Climate Change Office under the Ministry of Environment November, 2009 Financing Energy Efficiency Investments for Climate Change Mitigation Table of Contents 1. GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION ........................................................................................... 4 2. RELIEF.................................................................................................................................... 5 3. CLIMATE................................................................................................................................ 5 4. NATURAL RESOURCES...................................................................................................... 7 4.1. LAND RESOURCES................................................................................................................. 7 4.2. WATER RESOURCES.............................................................................................................. 8 4.2.1. RIVERS................................................................................................................................. 8 4.2.2. LAKES .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Projects Are Implemented in Cooperation with the Ecocatalyst Foundation NARRATIVE REPORT Reporting Organisation: National En
    The projects are implemented in cooperation with the EcoCatalyst Foundation NARRATIVE REPORT Reporting Organisation: National Environmental Center Country: Republic of Moldova Reporting period: 2015 1 1. Background This project has the following major activities which were carried out in 2015: CNM – leader in IWRM in Moldova Developing a youth network “Love your river!” Festival of Bic river Collaboration with the Ministry of Internal Affairs to counteract cases of environmental pollution Various activities were organised in 2015 to strengthen the youth network “Love your river!”. In autumn 2015 it is envisaged to organise the first Forum of the Youth Network “Love your river!” in order to agree and plan the activities for 2016. The third edition of the Festival of Bic river “Love your river!” will be organised in 2016 due to the fact, that there were organised local elections in summer 2015 and the chairs of the District Councils were changed, now CNM will establish relations with the newly appointed Chairs of the District Councils and other newly elected representatives of public authorities to further implement the Bic river Rehabilitation Initiative and plan the organisation of the 3rd edition of the Bic Festival. Letters to ask for the support will be again sent to private companies and to the Mayoralty of Chisinau municipality who will be the host of the event. It is envisaged to involve more seriously those companies which will be included in the SCR program of CNM. CNM will continue to promote the creation and support the operation of the River Basin Councils. At the moment CNM is Technical Secretariat of the Bic Basin Council which is meeting 3-4 times a year to discuss solutions for the improvement of the environmental state of the river, and it has also helped the local authorities to create Ichel Basin Council (spring 2015), Tigheci Basin Council (autumn 2014, the second meeting was organised in winter 2015) and Larga Basin Council (autumn 2014, the second meeting was organised in winter 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Lea Raport Periodic Al Republicii Moldova
    ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES ACFC/SR/V(2019)011 Fifth Report submitted by the Republic of Moldova Pursuant to Article 25, paragraph 2 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities – received on 22 May 2019 ACFC/SR/V(2019)011 FIFTH PERIODIC REPORT OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………………...3 PART I……………………………………………………………………………………4 Information on practical arrangements made by the Republic of Moldova to continue implementing the Framework Convention, to increase the involvement of civil society in the process and to pursue the dialogue with the Advisory Committee PART II…………………………………………………………………………………..7 Information on measures taken by the Republic of Moldova to address the issues for immediate action identified in the forth monitoring cycle and assessment of other core issues that are outstanding after four cycles. Situation in the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova…………………………...7 Strengthening of national legal and regulatory framework…………………………………..8 Practical measures: Implementation of the Action Plan for 2017-2020 for the Strategy on the Consolidation of Interethnic Relations in the Republic of Moldova for2017-2027………………...…13 Measures taken to preserve the memory of the Holocaust victims, to study and to spread knowledge about the Holocaust…………………………………………………14 Implementation of the Action Plan to
    [Show full text]
  • (Eni/2016/372-403) the Danube, Prut and Black Sea
    European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership cOUNTRIES (ENI/2016/372-403) THE DANUBE, PRUT AND BLACK SEA RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN IN REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA for the future planning cycle (2022-2027) TECHNICAL REPORT N°6 ON ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF WATER USE December – 2019 Technical Report N°6 Economical analysis of water use Beneficiaries IWRM department of the MARDE (legislation and supervision), Agency “Apele Moldovei” (Planning coordination and follow up of implementation) Produced by OIKUMENA Public Association Authors Petru Bacal, Iurie Bejan, Vitalie Dilan, Lucia Căpățînă, Nicolae Boboc, Boris Iurciuc, Natalia Zgîrcu Produced for: International Office for Water (France), as contracting authority responsible for RBM planning in EUWI+East member state consortium Supervision Radu Cazacu and Dumitru Proca from Apele Moldovei supported by Pierre Henry de Villeneuve (IOWater) and Victor Bujac (National EUWI+ Project Representative in Moldova) Date December 2019 Version Final Acknowledgements: Apele Romane for offering its support including the direct contribution of Irina Tutunaru from Water Administration Prut – Barlad River Basin, Romania Financed by: European Union Co-financed by: Austrian Development Agency and the Artois-Picardie Water Agency (France) for the implementing Member States Disclaimer: The EU-funded program European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+ 4 EaP) is implemented by the UNECE, OECD, responsible for the implementation of Result 1 and an EU member state consortium of Austria, managed by the lead coordinator Umweltbundesamt, and of France, managed by the International Office for Water, responsible for the implementation of Result 2 and 3. This document, the “TECHNICAL REPORT N°6 ON ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF WATER USE”, was produced by the EU member state consortium with the financial assistance of the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Report of the Webpages of the Courts of Law in the Republic of Moldova
    rt Monitoring Report of the Webpages of the Courts of Law in the Republic of Moldova 1 CONTENTS 1. Supreme Court of Justice ……………………………………………………………………….... 4 2. Chisinau Court of Appeals…...………………………………………………………………….... 7 3. Balti Court of Appeals ….………………………………………………………………………... 9 4. Bender Court of Appeals …..…………………………………………………………………..... 12 5. Cahul Court of Appeals …..……………………………………………………………………... 13 6. Comrat Court of Appeals …..…………………………………………………………………… 15 7. Botanica District Court of Chisinau Municipality ….…………………………………………... 17 8. Buiucani District Court of Chisinau Municipality ….…………………………………………... 19 9. Centru District Court of Chisinau Municipality ….…………………………………………….. 20 10. Ciocana District Court of Chisinau Municipality ….…………………………………………… 21 11. Riscani District Court of Chisinau Municipality ….……………………………………………. 23 12. Balti District Court ….…………………………………………………………………………... 24 13. Bender District Court ….………………………………………………………………………... 25 14. Anenii Noi District Court ….……………………………………………………………………. 26 15. Basarabeasca District Court ….…………………………………………………………………. 27 16. Briceni District Court ….………………………………………………………………………... 28 17. Cahul District Court ….…………………………………………………………………………. 29 18. Cantemir District Court ….……………………………………………………………………… 30 19. Calarasi District Court ….……………………………………………………………………….. 32 20. Causeni District Court ….……………………………………………………………………….. 33 21. Ceadir Lunga District Court ….…...…………………………………………………………….. 34 22. Cimislia District Court ….………………………………………………………………………. 35 23. Comrat District Court
    [Show full text]
  • Security of Supply Statements of the Republic of Moldova
    Security of Supply Statements of the Republic of Moldova Ministry of Economy of the Republic of Moldova Chisinau, 2013 Security of Supply Statements of the Republic of Moldova FOREWORD The subject of Security of Supply (SoS) Statements for 2013 is the first SoS that the Ministry of Economy (MoE) of the Republic of Moldova (RoM) is submitting to the Energy Community (EnC) Secretariat.1 ‘Security of supply’ means the ability of an energy (electricity, gas and oil) system to supply final customers with respective (network) energy, as provided for under respective EU directives addressing the SoS issue. The satisfactory SoS can be reduced to the unsatisfactory level due to several possible reasons: non-existence and/or reduced availability of indigenous energy resources; operational constrains of various nature (technical an non-technical) in the production / transport / supply chain; import inadequacy (single source and/or supply routes) or due to insufficient interconnections and non- existence of contingency plans in critical situations etc., however, which cannot be regarded as force majeure. Inadequate legal / regulatory and institutional / organisational and contractual arrangements may impose additional risks to the SoS. On the other hand, proper planning and implementation of investments projects and other measures can significantly improve the SoS in the RoM, by establishing (i) an adequate level of generation capacity, (ii) an adequate balance between supply and demand, and (iii) c) an appropriate level of interconnections between the EU member states and Contracting Parties (CP) to the Energy Community Treaty (ECT), in our case Romania and Ukraine. However, as each country’s energy systems have their own characteristics, the SoS in the RoM has to be observed with the country’s own conditions and peculiarities.
    [Show full text]
  • Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions in the Republic of Moldova Page I
    Ambulatory care sensitive conditions in the Republic of Moldova Page i Ambulatory care sensitive conditions in the Republic of Moldova Health Services Delivery Programme Division of Health Systems and Public Health Ministerul Sănătății al Republicii Moldova Ambulatory care sensitive conditions in the Republic of Moldova January 2015 Health Services Delivery Programme Division of Health Systems and Public Health Ambulatory care sensitive conditions in the Republic of Moldova Page iv Abstract In the context of a multicountry study on ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) in the WHO European Region, this study seeks to contribute to strengthening health services delivery by identifying possible improvements to effectively prevent, diagnose and treat ACSCs in primary health care settings, and deriving contextualized and actionable policy recommendations for health service delivery transformation. This study contains the results of desk research, data analysis, a country stakeholder meeting and follow-up interviews aimed at identifying potential opportunities that enable ACSCs to be effectively prevented, diagnosed and treated in a primary health care setting in the Republic of Moldova. Keywords AMBULATORY CARE PRIMARY HEALTHCARE HOSPITALIZATION MOLDOVA Address requests about publications of the WHO Regional Office for Europe to: Publications WHO Regional Office for Europe UN City, Marmorvej 51 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Alternatively, complete an online request form for documentation, health information, or for permission to quote or translate, on the Regional Office website (http://www.euro.who.int/pubrequest). © World Health Organization 2015 All rights reserved. The Regional Office for Europe of the World Health Organization welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full.
    [Show full text]
  • Searching for Our Jewish Roots in Vienna, Moldova, and Odessa by Michael and Andrea Burke January, 2013
    Searching For Our Jewish Roots in Vienna, Moldova, and Odessa by Michael and Andrea Burke January, 2013 In late September and October 2012 my wife, Andrea, and I traveled through Eastern Europe and Turkey. The primary purpose of the trip was to research my family background, primarily my father's roots in the former Bessarabia, which currently is roughly contained by the borders of Moldova. The original impetus for this trip was a photograph, taken in about 1937, of my father standing in front of a mosque. My father served with the American Lincoln Brigade, fighting against the fascists in the Spanish Civil War, so I had originally thought the mosque was somewhere in Spain. When my youngest daughter was in the eighth grade in 2005 she worked on an assignment called Peopling the Nation in which each student chose a relative and researched this person's role in American history. Madeleine's study focused on my father. We searched the Internet for photographs of Spanish mosques, hoping to find the location of the photograph. We were eventually able to pinpoint the location, not in Spain but in Istanbul: it was the Sultan Ahmed Mosque (also known as the Blue Mosque). Whether at that moment or shortly thereafter, I promised myself I would make the journey to Istanbul and stand in my father's footsteps. Our original itinerary had us traveling to Istanbul and then heading north and west through Eastern Europe. From stories I remembered my father telling, I surmised he had been in Istanbul when he traveled through Europe raising funds to fight Franco.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practice in Local Government
    BBEESSTT PPRRAACCTTIICCEE IINN LLOOCCAALL GGOOVVEERRNNMMEENNTT Prepared By the Council of Europe Centre of Expertise for Local Government Reform in cooperation with CoE experts John Jackson, Cezary Trutkowski and Irfhan Mururajani April 2015, Council of Europe, Strasbourg Table of contents PART 1: IDENTIFYING AND CELEBRATING BEST PRACTICE .................................................... 1 1. THE BACKGROUND TO BEST PRACTICE ................................................................... 1 2. THE MEANING OF BEST PRACTICE ............................................................................. 6 3. HOW TO ORGANISE BEST PRACTICE PROGRAMMES ........................................... 12 4. KEY STAGES IN A BEST PRACTICE PROGRAMME................................................. 15 PART 2: TRANSFORMING BEST PRACTICE INTO A TRAINING PROGRAMME ................... 25 3. EVENTS AND ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................ 28 a) Best Practice Open Day .................................................................................................. 28 b) Workshops ...................................................................................................................... 33 c) Learning exchanges ........................................................................................................ 33 d) Study visits ..................................................................................................................... 33 4. PUBLICATIONS ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]