DOCSLIB.ORG

Comparing Four Different Types of Sexual Fluidity in Women

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comparing Four Different Types of Sexual Fluidity in Women Archives of Sexual Behavior https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01565-1 ORIGINAL PAPER Who Counts as Sexually Fluid? Comparing Four Diferent Types of Sexual Fluidity in Women Lisa M. Diamond1 · Jenna Alley1 · Janna Dickenson2 · Karen L. Blair3 Received: 18 February 2019 / Revised: 19 September 2019 / Accepted: 3 October 2019 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Previous research has examined the phenomenon of “sexual fuidity,” but there is no current consensus on the specifc mean- ing and operationalization of this construct. The present study used a sample of 76 women with diverse sexual orientations to compare four diferent types of sexual fuidity: (1) fuidity as overall erotic responsiveness to one’s less-preferred gender, (2) fuidity as situational variability in erotic responsiveness to one’s less-preferred gender, (3) fuidity as discrepancy between the gender patterning of sexual attractions and the gender patterning of sexual partnering, and (4) fuidity as instability in day-to- day attractions over time. We examined how these four types of fuidity relate to one another and to other features of women’s sexual profles (bisexual vs. exclusive patterns of attraction, sex drive, interest in uncommitted sex, age of sexual debut, and lifetime number of sexual partners). The four types of fuidity were not correlated with one another (with the exception of the frst and fourth), and each showed a unique pattern of association with other features of women’s sexual profles. The only type of fuidity associated with bisexuality was overall erotic responsiveness to the less-preferred gender. The fndings demonstrate that future research on sexual fuidity should distinguish between its diferent forms. Keywords Bisexuality · Sexual orientation · Sexual fuidity · Individual diferences · Women Introduction time (reviewed in Diamond, 2016). Yet, do these divergent experiences represent the same basic phenomenon? If so, then Extensive research has investigated sexual fuidity, typically women who are “fuid” according to one defnition should be defned as a capacity for variation in sexual responsiveness “fuid” according to the others, and in such a case it would be due to situational, interpersonal, and contextual infuences meaningful to conceptualize sexual fuidity as an overarching (reviewed in Baumeister, 2000; Diamond, 2008b). Numer- individual diference dimension. Alternatively, the construct ous sexual phenomena have been ascribed to sexual fuid- of “sexual fuidity” might be inappropriately combining dis- ity, such as the fact that individuals sometimes experience tinct forms of sexual variability that have diferent origins sexual desires that run counter to their self-described sexual and implications. If so, it would be important to determine orientation (Chivers & Bailey, 2005; Chivers, Rieger, Latty, how these diferent forms of sexual variability relate to one & Bailey, 2004; Diamond, 2008b), sometimes report sexual another and to other features of individuals’ sexual histories behavior that diverges from their self-described sexual orien- and profles. This is the aim of the present research. tation (Diamond, 2008b; Dixon, 1984), and sometimes report Before proceeding, it bears noting that the present study focuses changes in their pattern of sexual attractions and behavior over on variability in the gender organization of one’s erotic respon- siveness, meaning the degree to which one’s erotic responsiveness * Lisa M. Diamond depends on the gender of the erotic target (a construct convention- [email protected] ally denoted as sexual orientation). Yet, gender is certainly not the only dimension that organizes erotic responsiveness: Rather, 1 Department of Psychology, University of Utah, 380 South stable patterns of erotic responsiveness have been observed with 1530 East, Room 502, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0251, USA regard to dimensions such as partner age and type of sexual activ- 2 Program in Human Sexuality, University of Minnesota, ity (Chivers, Roy, Grimbos, Cantor, & Seto, 2014; Seto, 2012), Minneapolis, MN, USA and recent models of sexuality suggest the value of substituting 3 Department of Psychology, St. Francis Xavier University, our conventional emphasis on gender-based sexual orientations Antigonish, NS, Canada Vol.:(0123456789)1 3 Archives of Sexual Behavior with a broader notion of sexual confgurations (van Anders, 2015) fuidity difers from bisexuality (as reviewed in Diamond, 2008a, capable of incorporating all relevant organizing domains. Theo- 2008b, 2016). An implicit assumption underlying this particu- retically, “fuidity” could be defned as any form of erotic respon- lar conceptualization of sexual fuidity is that individuals who siveness which deviates from an individual’s typical confguration respond erotically to their LPG in one situation (for example, (i.e., someone attracted to children who experiences an unexpected a laboratory study) will also respond erotically to their LPG in attraction to an adult), and such forms of fuidity deserve much other situations (for example, day-to-day life). greater investigation. For the present study, however, we focus on Our second model of fuidity dispenses with this assump- variability in the gendered organization of erotic responsiveness, tion and instead defnes sexual fuidity as variability in one’s which is arguably one of the most important and distinctive, and erotic responsiveness across diferent situations. This form of our usage of the term “fuidity” should be interpreted as such. fuidity would characterize a woman who responds erotically to her LPG in the laboratory, but not in everyday life. This Operationalizing Sexual Fluidity model is consistent with a conceptualization of fuidity as a heightened sensitivity to context (Diamond, 2008a, 2008b). Previous studies have typically defned sexual fuidity as one The third model focuses on the phenomenon of discrepancies or more of the following: a capacity for erotic responsiveness between the gender patterning of one’s sexual attractions and to one’s “less-preferred” gender (abbreviated as LPG), pur- the gender patterning of one’s sexual partnering (i.e., self- suit of sexual behavior with the LPG, or change over time in identifed lesbians pursuing sex with men and self-identifed erotic responsiveness to the LPG. These diferent defnitions heterosexuals pursuing sex with women). It is important to capture diferent forms of variability in erotic responsiveness, conceptualize this type of fluidity separately from other but there is little theory or research to suggest whether they forms, given that sexual partnering is highly constrained by represent the same phenomenon. Consider, for example, two structural factors and opportunities. The last model focuses women who show sexual arousal to their less-preferred gen- on instability over time in erotic responsiveness. Importantly, der in a laboratory assessment. One of these women might our research uses short-term prospective measurement of also experience periodic sexual attractions to her LPG in the daily variation in sexual attraction, and hence, we are unable course of everyday life, whereas the other may not: Does this to assess long-term stability in erotic responsiveness over diference matter? One of them might pursue periodic sexual the scale of years (as in Dickson, Roode, Cameron, & Paul, behavior with the LPG, whereas the other might not: Does 2013; Ott, Corliss, Wypij, Rosario, & Austin, 2011; Savin- this diference matter? One may fnd that her attractions to Williams, Joyner, & Rieger, 2012). Rather we focus on a the LPG strengthen over time, whereas the other may not: specifc type of instability that is based on dynamical systems Does this diference matter? theory: the degree to which temporal variability in erotic Currently, we do not know the answers to these questions, but responsiveness is anchored by an individual’s own setpoint. they are critically important for understanding the prevalence, This model has the advantage of presuming that all individu- mechanisms, and implications of sexual fuidity. Toward this als might show some degree of variability in erotic respon- end, we take a frst step toward answering these questions by siveness over time, but that the variability of “highly fuid” diferentiating and operationalizing diferent forms of fuidity individuals takes a diferent form, in that it is less likely to and investigating how they relate to one another and to additional revert to the original pattern after deviating from this pattern. features of women’s sexual histories and experiences. Based on Our research is uniquely able to diferentiate the four types previous research, we focus on four types of fuidity that have of fluidity described above because our multi-method study the strongest empirical and theoretical basis (although there cer- incorporates data on women’s history of sexual partnering, tainly may be others): (1) fuidity as heightened erotic respon- self-perceived identity/orientation, daily experience of sexual siveness to one’s less-preferred gender, (2) fuidity as situational attraction to the less preferred over a 2-week diary assessment, variability in erotic responsiveness to the LPG (for example, and self-reported arousal to sexual stimuli featuring the less- laboratory arousal vs. day-to-day attraction), (3) fuidity as dis- preferred gender in a laboratory assessment. Hence, we can crepancy between sexual attraction and sexual partnering with examine whether diferent types
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Robust Evidence for Bisexual Orientation Among Men
    Robust evidence for bisexual orientation among men Jeremy Jabboura, Luke Holmesb, David Sylvac, Kevin J. Hsud, Theodore L. Semona, A. M. Rosenthala, Adam Safrone, Erlend Slettevoldb, Tuesday M. Watts-Overallf, Ritch C. Savin-Williamsg, John Syllah,i, Gerulf Riegerb,1, and J. Michael Baileya,1,2 aDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208; bDepartment of Psychology, Essex University, Colchester CO4 3SQ, United Kingdom; cDepartment of Psychiatry, Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles, CA 90056; dDepartment of Psychological and Social Sciences, Pennsylvania State University Abington, Abington, PA 19001; eKinsey Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405; fSchool of Psychology, University of East London, Stratford E15 4LZ, United Kingdom; gDepartment of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-4401; hAmerican Institute of Bisexuality, Los Angeles, CA 90014; and iUniversity of Chicago Law School, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 Edited by Steven Pinker, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, and approved June 16, 2020 (received for review February 25, 2020) The question whether some men have a bisexual orientation— emotional biases of the questioners. Some heterosexual and ho- that is, whether they are substantially sexually aroused and mosexual men may find it relatively easy to understand each attracted to both sexes—has remained controversial among both other’s monosexuality because both have strong sexual attraction scientists and laypersons. Skeptics believe that male sexual orien- to one sex and virtually none to the other. For this reason, these tation can only be homosexual or heterosexual, and that bisexual men may have more difficulty accepting bisexuality as it challenges identification reflects nonsexual concerns, such as a desire to their binary conceptualizations of sexual orientation (7).
    [Show full text]
  • What Can Asexuality Offer Sociology? Insights from the 2017 Asexual Community Census
    Suggested citation: Carroll, Megan. (2020). What can asexuality offer sociology? Insights from the 2017 Asexual Community Census. Manuscript submitted for publication, California State University, San Bernardino, California. What Can Asexuality Offer Sociology? Insights from the 2017 Asexual Community Census Megan Carroll, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Sociology California State University - San Bernardino Contact: Megan Carroll, Department of Sociology, California State University – San Bernardino, 5500 University Parkway SB327, San Bernardino, CA 92407-2397, [email protected] 2 *** In August 2018, the ASA Section on Sociology of Sexualities hosted a preconference before the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association to gather insights and showcase the work of top contributors of sociological work on sexualities. Outstanding work from across the discipline was featured in panels, workshops, and roundtables across the two days of conferencing, and critical questions of race, politics, and violence were deservedly prioritized amid an increasingly urgent political climate. While this preconference served to advance the discipline’s efforts toward generating knowledge and healing social divides, it also symbolized the range of American sociology’s contributions to interdisciplinary knowledge on sexuality. Missing from the work presented at the pre-conference was any mention of asexualities. Sociological insights on asexuality (i.e. a lack of sexual attraction) have been very limited. While some sociologists have devoted attention toward asexualities in their work (e.g. Carrigan 2011; Cuthbert 2017; Dawson, Scott, and McDonnell 2018; Poston and Baumle 2010; Scherrer and Pfeffer 2017; Simula, Sumerau, and Miller 2019; Sumerau et al. 2018; Troia 2018; Vares 2018), the field more often contributes to the invisibility of asexuality than sheds light on it.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Attraction, Behavior, and Identity in the Asexual Community
    Rowan University Rowan Digital Works Theses and Dissertations 6-2-2020 Understanding attraction, behavior, and identity in the asexual community Corey Doremus Rowan University Follow this and additional works at: https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd Part of the Clinical Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Doremus, Corey, "Understanding attraction, behavior, and identity in the asexual community" (2020). Theses and Dissertations. 2801. https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd/2801 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Rowan Digital Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Rowan Digital Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNDERSTANDING ATTRACTION, BEHAVIOR, AND IDENTITY IN THE ASEXUAL COMMUNITY by Corey Doremus A Thesis Submitted to the Department of Psychology College of Science and Mathematics In partial fulfillment of the requirement For the degree of Master of Arts in Clinical Psychology at Rowan University May 13, 2020 Thesis Chair: Meredith Joppa, Ph.D. and DJ Angelone, Ph.D. © 2020 Corey Doremus Dedication This thesis is dedicated to my wife, whose tireless support and love can not adequately be put into words. Thank you for never doubting my ability, even when I did. Acknowledgments I’m unable to quantify my thanks for my incredible mentors Dr. Meredith Joppa and Dr. DJ Angelone. Without their guidance and patience there’s simply no way this thesis would exist. I am incredibly honored to have the opportunity to benefit from their continued support of my personal and professional growth. iv Abstract Corey Doremus UNDERSTANDING ATTRACTION, BEHAVIOR, AND IDENTITY IN THE ASEXUAL COMMUNITY 2019-2020 Meredith Joppa Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Female Same-Sex Sexuality from a Dynamical Systems Perspective: Sexual Desire, Motivation, and Behavior
    Female Same-Sex Sexuality from a Dynamical Systems Perspective: Sexual Desire, Motivation, and Behavior Rachel H. Farr, Lisa M. Diamond & Steven M. Boker Archives of Sexual Behavior The Official Publication of the International Academy of Sex Research ISSN 0004-0002 Volume 43 Number 8 Arch Sex Behav (2014) 43:1477-1490 DOI 10.1007/s10508-014-0378-z 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Springer Science +Business Media New York. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self- archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com”. 1 23 Author's personal copy Arch Sex Behav (2014) 43:1477–1490 DOI 10.1007/s10508-014-0378-z ORIGINAL PAPER Female Same-Sex Sexuality from a Dynamical Systems Perspective: Sexual Desire, Motivation, and Behavior Rachel H. Farr • Lisa M. Diamond • Steven M. Boker Received: 13 February 2013 / Revised: 21 February 2014 / Accepted: 14 April 2014 / Published online: 6 September 2014 Ó Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014 Abstract Fluidity in attractions and behaviors among same- Keywords Dynamical systems analysis Á sex attracted women has been well-documented, suggesting Female sexuality Á Sexual orientation Á Sexual attraction Á the appropriateness of dynamical systems modeling of these Sexual behavior phenomena over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Bisexuality Among a Cohort of University Students: Prevalence and Psychological Distress
    International Journal of Impotence Research https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-017-0014-2 ARTICLE Bisexuality among a cohort of university students: prevalence and psychological distress 1 1 2,3 1 1 4 Giacomo Ciocca ● Caterina Solano ● Giorgio Di Lorenzo ● Erika Limoncin ● Daniele Mollaioli ● Eleonora Carosa ● 4 5,6 2 2,3 2,3 Alberto Collazzoni ● Emiliano Santarnecchi ● Emanuela Bianciardi ● Cinzia Niolu ● Alberto Siracusano ● 4,7 1 Alessandro Rossi ● Emmanuele A. Jannini Received: 2 May 2017 / Revised: 21 September 2017 / Accepted: 4 October 2017 © 2017 Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature Abstract Sociocultural prejudices and pressures may impair the psychological symptoms, bisexuality is characterized by a mental health of bisexual people. We aim to evaluate strong link with some facets of psychological distress, psychological status according to sexual orientation in a which are likely caused by a peculiar double stigma. In sample of Italian university students, with specific attention conclusion, through a specific psychometric tool, we found to bisexuality and its frequency. Among a recruited sample an association between bisexuality and various forms of 1234567890 of 551 university students, we found the following psychological suffering. This evidence should further percentages for sexual orientation: heterosexuals 96.9% encourage clinicians to accurately assess the psychological (n = 534), homosexuals 1.1% (n = 6), bisexuals 2% (n = health in young bisexual people. 11). The cross-sectional analysis for psychological symp- toms, with the Symptoms Check List-90 Revised (SCL-90- R), revealed that bisexual subjects have statistically Introduction significant higher scores on some symptomatic scales compared to heterosexuals. In particular, obsession-com- The psychological wellness of lesbian, gay and bisexual pulsion, paranoid ideation, hostility were significantly (LGB) people is currently a matter of scientific debate and is higher in bisexuals.
    [Show full text]
  • HANDOUT 4.1: SEXUAL ORIENTATIONS Adapted with Permission from the UUA Website
    HANDOUT 4.1: SEXUAL ORIENTATIONS Adapted with permission from the UUA website. Find more at uua.org/lgbtq/identity This handout provides a non-comprehensive list of ways that people identify their sexual orientation. A comprehensive list would need to be updated frequently with emerging thought on sexual orientation. If you come across terminology that is not included here, look it up online. There are always new things to learn about sexual orientation! Even though many people associate the abbreviation LGBTQIA with sexual orientation, it also includes terms related to gender identity. The last four letters stand for transgender, queer and/or questioning, intersex, and ally and/or asexual. Asexual (adjective): Not sexually attracted to anyone and/or having no desire to act on sexual attraction to anyone. Does not necessarily mean sexless. Asexual people may experience affectional (romantic) attraction and may engage in sexual activity. Sometimes shortened to ace. Bisexual (adjective): Attracted to people of one’s own gender and people of other genders. Two common misconceptions are that bisexual people are attracted to everyone and anyone, and that they just haven’t “decided what they really are.” Often shortened to bi. See also pansexual and queer. Gay (adjective): Primarily or only attracted to people of the same sex. The word is often used specifically about men. Heterosexual (adjective): Primarily or only attracted to people of the sex considered opposite one’s own. Homosexual (adjective): Primarily or only attracted to people of the same sex; a synonym for gay. The words homosexual and heterosexual are seen by many today as medicalized terms that should be retired from common use.
    [Show full text]
  • International Human Rights Law and Sexual Orientation & Gender Identity
    FACT SHEET International Human Rights Law and Sexual Orientation & Gender Identity What are human rights? implemented, and enforced at the local level. At the Human rights are rights inherent to all human beings. international level these mechanisms include treaty bodies, We are all equally entitled to our human rights without expert committees established by treaty and tasked with discrimination, whatever our nationality, place of residence, monitoring implementation of treaty obligations, and special sex, national or ethnic origin, color, religion, language, or rapporteurs and other independent experts appointed by any other status, such as age, disability, health status, sexual the United Nations Human Rights Council to investigate orientation or gender identity. These rights, whether they and report on pressing human rights challenges. are civil and political rights (such as the right to life, equality before the law and freedom of expression) or economic, social Is it ever legal to discriminate against lesbian, gay, and cultural rights (such as the rights to work, social security bisexual, transgender or intersex people? and education) are indivisible, universal, interrelated and No. The right to equality and non-discrimination are core interdependent. principles of human rights, enshrined in the United Nations Human rights were developed and articulated in the Universal Charter, The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) Declaration of Human Rights (1948) as a response to the and human rights treaties. The opening words of the atrocities of World War II. Universal human rights are often Universal Declaration of Human Rights are unequivocal: expressed and guaranteed by law, in the forms of treaties, “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.” customary international law, general principles and other The equality and non-discrimination guarantee provided sources of international law.
    [Show full text]
  • 15-Bisexuality.Pdf
    51 Bisexuality** What is Bisexuality? Bisexuality is the potential to feel sexually attracted to and to engage in sensual or sexual relationships with people of either sex. A bisexual person may not be equally attracted to both sexes, and the degree of attraction may vary over time. Self-perception is the key to bisexual identity. Many people engage in sexual activity with people of both sexes, yet do not identify as bisexual. Likewise, other people engage in sexual relations only with people of one sex, or do not engage in sexual activity at all, yet consider themselves bisexual. There is no behavioral "test" to determine whether or not one is bisexual. Bisexual Identity Some people believe that a person is born heterosexual, homosexual, or bisexual (for instance due to prenatal hormonal influences), and that their identity is inherent and unchangeable. Others believe that sexual orientation is due to socialization (for example either imitating or rejecting parental models) or conscious choice (for example, choosing lesbianism as part of a political feminist identity). Others believe that these factors interact. Because biological, social, and cultural factors are different for each person, everyone's sexuality is highly individual, whether they are bisexual, gay or lesbian, heterosexual, or asexual. The "value" placed on a sexual identity should not depend on its origin. Many people assume that bisexuality is just a phase people go through. In fact, any sexual orientation can be a phase. Humans are diverse, and individual sexual feelings and behavior can change over time. The creation and consolidation of a sexual identity is an ongoing process.
    [Show full text]
  • A Report on the Experiences of Lesbians, Gays and Bisexuals In
    Inside-OUT: A Report on the Experiences of Lesbians, Gays and Bisexuals in America and the Public’s Views on Issues and Policies Related to Sexual Orientation Inside-OUT: A Report on the Experiences of Lesbians, Gays and Bisexuals in America and the Public’s Views on Issues and Policies Related to Sexual Orientation Introduction In the fall of 2000, the Kaiser Family Foundation conducted two national public opinion surveys: one, to gather information on the experiences of self-identified lesbians, gays and bisexuals; and a second to gauge the general public’s attitudes toward this group and their views on key policy issues related to sexual orientation. We did so to shed light on where the public really stands on what has been a contentious issue in the United States, and the potential implications for social and health policy. The Foundation also wanted to better understand the role that stigma and discrimination play in access to health care and health outcomes. What we find is that a large majority of self-identified lesbians, gays and bisexuals believe there is more acceptance of lesbians and gays today compared to a few years ago. At the same time, they have experienced a significant amount of prejudice and discrimination. Nearly three quarters have been the targets of verbal abuse, and nearly one third have been the target of physical violence based on sexual orientation. Although a large majority are now open about their sexual orientation to friends, family members and co-workers, one third say that their family or a family member has refused to accept them because of their sexual orientation.
    [Show full text]
  • Genders & Sexualities Terms
    GENDERS & SEXUALITIES TERMS All terms should be evaluated by your local community to determine what best fits. As with all language, the communities that utilize these and other words may have different meanings and reasons for using different terminology within different groups. Agender: a person who does not identify with a gender identity or gender expression; some agender-identifying people consider themselves gender neutral, genderless, and/or non- binary, while some consider “agender” to be their gender identity. Ally/Accomplice: a person who recognizes their privilege and is actively engaged in a community of resistance to dismantle the systems of oppression. They do not show up to “help” or participate as a way to make themselves feel less guilty about privilege but are able to lean into discomfort and have hard conversations about being held accountable and the ways they must use their privilege and/or social capital for the true liberation of oppressed communities. Androgynous: a person who expresses or presents merged socially-defined masculine and feminine characteristics, or mainly neutral characteristics. Asexual: having a lack of (or low level of) sexual attraction to others and/or a lack of interest or desire for sex or sexual partners. Asexuality exists on a spectrum from people who experience no sexual attraction nor have any desire for sex, to those who experience low levels of sexual attraction and only after significant amounts of time. Many of these different places on the spectrum have their own identity labels. Another term used within the asexual community is “ace,” meaning someone who is asexual.
    [Show full text]
  • LGBT Rights: Frequently Asked Questions
    FACT SHEET LGBT Rights: Frequently Asked Questions What does “LGBT” mean? but were classified as males when they were born. LGBT stands for “lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender.” Transmen identify as men but were classified female While these terms have increasing global resonance, in when they were born. Some transgender people seek different cultures other terms may be used to describe surgery or take hormones to bring their body into people who form same-sex relationships and those who alignment with their gender identity; others do not. exhibit non-binary gender identities (such as hijra, meti, lala, skesana, motsoalle, mithli, kuchu, kawein, travesty, muxé, What is intersex? fa’afafine, fakaleiti, hamjensgara and Two-Spirit). In a human An intersex person is born with sexual anatomy, reproductive rights context, lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender organs, and/or chromosome patterns that do not fit the people face both common and distinct challenges. Intersex typical definition of male or female. This may be apparent people (those born with atypical sex characteristics) suffer at birth or become so later in life. An intersex person may many of the same kinds of human rights violations as LGBT identify as male or female or as neither. Intersex status people, as indicated below. is not about sexual orientation or gender identity: intersex people experience the same range of sexual orientations What is “sexual orientation”? and gender identities as non-intersex people. Sexual orientation refers to a person’s physical, romantic and/or emotional attraction towards other people. Everyone What are homophobia and transphobia? has a sexual orientation, which is integral to a person’s Homophobia is an irrational fear of, hatred or aversion identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence Shows Sexual Orientation Can Change: Debunking the Myth of “Immutability”
    Evidence Shows Sexual Orientation Can Change: Debunking the Myth of “Immutability” Peter Sprigg EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Many of the advances of the homosexual movement have been based on the claim that sexual orientation is “immutable.” For example, Justice Anthony Kennedy’s majority opinion in the 2015 Supreme Court case that redefined marriage to include same-sex couples rested upon that assertion. Key policy issues still being debated in which the supposed “immutability” of sexual orientation can be an issue include efforts by LGB activists to expand non-discrimination laws to protect sexual orientation (such as the proposed federal “Equality Act”), and efforts to restrict or ban sexual orientation change efforts (SOCE), sometimes called “conversion therapy.” The concept of “sexual orientation” is multi-faceted, involving a combination of attractions, behaviors, and personal identity. Changes in any of these elements (sometimes called “sexual fluidity”), and a lack of “stability” or “exclusivity” in or among them, represents evidence that sexual orientation can change. This paper reports results from four large data sets reflecting longitudinal analysis of the same individuals over time in population-based samples (three from the United States and one from New Zealand). All demonstrate that significant change in each of the elements of sexual orientation is possible. The percentage changing from homosexuality to heterosexuality ranged from 13% to 53%, while the percentage changing from heterosexuality to homosexuality ranged only from 1% to 12%. This suggests that heterosexuality is largely stable but homosexuality is not. In one survey of “same-sex attracted respondents,” up to 38% of men and 53% of women “changed to heterosexuality” in only a six- year period.
    [Show full text]