TRAFFIC SAFETY FACTS Research Note

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

TRAFFIC SAFETY FACTS Research Note TRAFFIC SAFETY FACTS Research Note DOT HS 811 845 July 2011 Four High-Visibility Enforcement Demonstration Waves in Connecticut and New York Reduce Hand-Held Phone Use By Linda Cosgrove, Neil Chaudhary, and Ian Reagan The National Highway Traffic interim report addressing the first “Good laws Drivers using Safety Administration initiated two waves is available (Cosgrove coupled distracted driving demonstration et al., 2010). hand-held with tough programs in two communities cell phones enforcement to test whether a high-visibility Background while driving can reduce enforcement (HVE) model could In 2009, NHTSA estimated that dropped 57% deadly dis- reduce two specific instances 5% of drivers nationwide were in Hartford of distracted driving— talking using a hand-held cell phone tracted driving (from 6.8% to or texting using a hand-held while driving at any given day- behavior.” cell phone. The light time, down from 2.9%) and 32% —Transportation HVE model com- 6% in 2008 (Pickrell in Syracuse Secretary bines dedicated law & Ye, 2010). The esti- (from 3.7% to Ray LaHood enforcement during mated total number 2.5%). a specified period, of drivers using hand- paid and earned media that emphasizes an held cell phones was Drivers who enforcement-based message, and evalua- 672,000 (5% of 134 were texting tion before and after. NHTSA’s best known million drivers on the DISTRACTED DRIVING while driving and most successful HVE campaign is A deadly epidemic road) at a typical day- the Click It or Ticket seat belt enforcement light moment in the declined 72% mobilization. HVE has also been effective The Definition: United States in 2009. in Hartford in combating aggressive driving, impaired ■ Distracted Driving is any (from 3.9% to driving, and speeding. The demonstration non-driving activity a Driving while dis- person engages in that takes 1.1%) and 32% projects were aimed to test whether HVE tracted increases the attention away from the in Syracuse would be effective in modifying driver primary task of driving. likelihood of a crash behavior to not use hand-held phones ■ Internal distractions occur (NHTSA, 2010) and (from 2.8% to inside the vehicle and can even experienced driv- to talk or text, whether law enforcement be in the form of using a cell 1.9%). would be able to observe violations, and phone, eating and drinking, ers who divert their talking to other passengers, gaze from the roadway for longer than 2 sec- whether an HVE campaign would increase watching a video, or drivers’ perceived risk of receiving a cita- changing the radio station. onds increase their crash risk (Klauer et al., tion for violating the law. ■ External distractions occur 2006). A meta-analysis (Horrey & Wickens, outside the vehicle and can 2006) of 23 experiments that measured the include looking at other This report summarizes results from four motorists, pedestrians, effects of cell phone use on driving perfor- HVE waves over the course of one year road conditions, or even mance found that, across all studies, reaction the scenery. targeting distracted driving in Hartford, times were consistently slower when using a Connecticut, and Syracuse, New York. An cell phone than when not using a phone. NHTSA’s Office of Behavioral Safety Research 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590 2 Many State legislatures have introduced laws banning Figure 1 hand-held cell phone use and texting in the past few Demonstration Program and Evaluation Timeline in years. New York1 and Connecticut2 passed laws ban- Harford, CT & Syracuse, NY ning hand-held cell phone use while driving in 2001 First Wave With Two Weeks of Paid Media and 2005, respectively. At the time of this report, 8 MAR 2010 APR MAY States and the District of Columbia have banned hand- Earned Media held cell phone use for all drivers, and 32 States and Paid Media Enforcement the District have banned texting for all drivers (GHSA, Evaluation Activities 2011). Thirty States also ban any use of a cell phone Public Awareness Cell Phone Observations (even with a hands-free device) for novice teen drivers. Wave 1 Under the leadership of the U.S. Department of Waves 2, 3, and 4 With One Week of Paid Media Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, NHTSA JUL 2010 AUG SEP OCT MAR 2011 APR Earned Media awarded two $200,000 cooperative agreements to Paid Media Connecticut and New York to implement and evaluate Enforcement demonstration programs that apply the high-visibility Evaluation Activities Public Awareness enforcement model to distracted driving at the commu- Cell Phone Observations nity level. Each state contributed an additional $100,000 Wave 2 Wave 3 Wave 4 to the federal funds. Syracuse and Hartford (a combina- tion of three contiguous cities—East Hartford, Hartford, Office participated. There were four waves of enforce- and West Hartford) conducted the demonstrations. ment over the course of one year. Program Description Under separate contracts, NHTSA provided evaluation NHTSA worked with the Connecticut Department and communications support to both sites. Preusser of Transportation and the New York Department Research Group was the evaluation firm and the of Motor Vehicles’ (DMV) Governor’s Traffic Safety Tombras Group was the communications firm. Committee to conduct model high-visibility enforce- The four waves of focused enforcement took place in ment programs in communities in the two States. In April, July, and October 2010 and March-April 2011. The Connecticut, the participating law enforcement agen- timeline shows the schedule for evaluation data collec- cies were the Connecticut State Police and the Hartford, tion, media flights, and enforcement in test and control West Hartford, and East Hartford Police Departments. sites before and after each of the four waves. In New York, the New York State Police, the Syracuse Police Department, and the Onondaga County Sheriff’s Development of the Creative Material NHTSA’s Office of Communications and Consumer 1 New York’s Hand-Held Law: Effective December 1, 2001. Use of a Information developed and tested new TV, radio, and hand-held cellular telephone to engage in a call while driving is online creative materials. Phone in One Hand, Ticket in prohibited. Violators may be issued a ticket for a traffic infraction, the Other became NHTSA’s distracted driving high- resulting in a fine of up to $100. Effective February 16, 2011, 2 driver penalty points will be assessed, in addition to the fine, for visibility enforcement message. The creative material violations of the cell-phone law. Source: NY Vehicle and Traffic, was designed to generate high awareness of stepped- Title 7, Article 33 §1225-c-d. up enforcement efforts about local cell phone laws New York’s Texting Law: Effective November 1, 2009. New York’s hand-held law prohibits all drivers from using portable electronic and convince drivers to adhere to those laws. The cre- devices to send text messages or e-mails while driving. The penalty ative materials are available at www.distraction.gov/ for a violation of this law is a fine of up to $150. It is a secondary law, campaign-tools/broadcast-materials. which requires other probable cause to initiate a stop. 2 Connecticut’s Hand-Held/Texting Law: Effective October 1, 2010. Connecticut’s new law imposed stronger penalties for motorists Earned Media using a hand-held electronic device for talking or texting. For example, the original exemption for first-time offenders who Secretary LaHood, NHTSA Administrator David provide proof of hand-held devices to the court is eliminated; Strickland, and senior State and local officials launched and the fines for violations increase with each subsequent law the campaign with press events (U.S. DOT, 2010) in both violation. Texting is a primary, stand-alone, basis for a ticket. The first offense fine is $100, $150 for the second offense, and $200 for New York and Connecticut on April 8, 2010. For New third and subsequent offenses. Source: CT Public Act No. 10-109. York, former Governor Paterson, Congressman Dan NHTSA’s Office of Behavioral Safety Research 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590 3 Maffei, former DMV Commissioner David Swarts, and communities and universities, and national coverage Syracuse Police Chief Frank Fowler led the Syracuse, including The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, The New York event. For Connecticut, Lt Governor Michael Boston Globe, Consumer Reports, MSNBC.com, ABC News Fedele, Governor’s Highway Safety Representative Good Morning America, FOX News, CBS, and ABC’s 20/20. Robbin Cabelus, former State senator Billy Ciotto for Congressman John Larson, Hartford Police Department To support social norming messages between the high- Lt Robert Allan, and Dr. Brendan Campbell from the visibility enforcement periods, ESPN, NHTSA, and Connecticut Children’s Medical Center led the Hartford State Farm Insurance promoted the “Put It Down” cam- event. Both events generated considerable coverage paign to generate awareness of the dangers caused by from local and national media outlets, including a fea- distracted driving. ture on ABC-TV’s Good Morning America (Clarke, 2010) and a feature on ABC News (San Miguel, 2010). Paid Media NHTSA’s Office of Communications and Consumer Each of the demonstration sites received sample earned Information purchased air time to promote the pro- media templates so that they could develop localized gram activity and emphasize the enforcement compo- press releases, fact sheets, and post wave press releases. nent among the target audience of men and women 18 Outreach with the news media and various partners to 45 years old. The television spots are available online during each wave resulted in scores of articles and at www.distraction.gov/hartford and www.distraction. events in both States. In Connecticut and New York, gov/syracuse.
Recommended publications
  • Washington State Highway Safety
    Washington State Highway Safety version 1.0 Return to Table of Contents Table of Contents Executive Summary ..........................................................................................................................................2 Legislative Update .........................................................................................................................4 Fiscal Overview of Obligations and Expenditures ..............................................................................10 Assessment of State Progress .....................................................................................................................11 Program Updates Impaired Driving ..........................................................................................................................14 Speeding ........................................................................................................................................25 Young Drivers ...............................................................................................................................28 Distracted Driving .......................................................................................................................31 Trac Records ..............................................................................................................................34 Occupant Protection .................................................................................................................38 Motorcycles ..................................................................................................................................44
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Tech: "Click It Or Ticket" Evaluation, 2008–2009
    TRAFFIC TECH Technology Transfer Series DOT HS 811 537 June 2013 Click It or Ticket Evaluation, 2008–2009 Click It or Ticket (CIOT) is a high-visibility enforcement use laws and enforcement of belt use laws remained program to increase seat belt use. Click It or Ticket was relatively strong. Support for a primary law remains adopted as a national program in 2003 and is credited strong; 72 percent in 2008 and 75 percent in 2009. with steady increases in seat belt use across the Nation. In 2009, seat belt use rates exceeded 90 percent in 14 Enforcement Activity States; Michigan had the highest rate of 98 percent. Not The 2008 CIOT campaign continued a four-year decline every driver buckled up on every trip, however, and in the number of seat belt citations issued. The 50 States some States lagged significantly behind the national and the District of Columbia reported a combined total belt rate of 84 percent in 2009. Seat belt use was below of 583,372 seat belt citations issued in 2008, and 570,545 80 percent in 14 States including two States that were in 2009, or 19 citations per 10K population. While lower, below 70 percent. NHTSA coordinated the 2008 and this citation rate is comparable to the citation rate of 2009 CIOT campaigns to encourage more improve- past successful CIOT programs (20 citations per 10K). ments in all 50 States and the District of Columbia. Table 1: State and DC Reported CIOT Activity 2003–2009 Paid Advertising and Public Awareness CIOT Law Enforcement Seat Belt Citations Belt Citations The level of paid advertising was less than previous Year Agencies Issued per 10K mobilizations mainly because an extended television 2003 10,506 508,492 18 2004 13,173 657,305 22 writers’ strike affected purchase plans in 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Nighttime Enforcement of Seat Belt Laws: an Evaluation of Three Community Programs This Publication Is Distributed by the U.S
    Nighttime Enforcement Of Seat Belt Laws: An Evaluation of Three Community Programs This publication is distributed by the U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, in the interest of information exchange. The opinions, findings and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the Department of Transportation or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The United States Government assumes no liability for its content or use thereof. If trade or manufacturers’ names or products are mentioned, it is because they are considered essential to the object of the publication and should not be construed as an endorsement. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. DOT HS 811 189 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date August 2009 Nighttime Enforcement of Seat Belt Laws: An Evaluation of Three Community Programs 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Mark G. Solomon, Robert H. B. Chaffe, David F. Preusser 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Preusser Research Group, Inc. 7100 Main Street Trumbull, CT 06611 11. Contract or Grant No. DTNH22-05-C-05094 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered U.S. Department of Transportation September 2005 – March National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 2009 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, D.C. 20590 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Alan Block served as the NHTSA Contracting Officer's Technical Representative for the study.
    [Show full text]
  • Distracted Driving Enforcement and Education Campaign Udrive
    For Immediate Release: Contact: Lt. William D. Walsh Distracted Driving Enforcement and Education Campaign UDrive. UText. UPay. to be carried out locally from April 1 – April 21, 2017 VOORHEES -- Law enforcement officers from the Voorhees Police Department will be cracking down on distracted drivers during April as part of New Jersey’s UDrive. UText. UPay. enforcement campaign. Beginning April 1 and running through April 21, the high visibility law enforcement initiative will target motorists who engage in dangerous distracted driving behaviors such as talking on hand-held cell phones and sending text messages while driving. “Distracted driving is a serious issue on our roadways,” said Gary Poedubicky, Acting Director of the New Jersey Division of Highway Traffic Safety. "The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration reports that in 2014 alone, 3,179 people were killed in distracted driving crashes and an estimated 431,000 people were injured in motor vehicle crashes involving a distracted driver.” Despite the fact that using a hand held cell phone or texting while driving is illegal in New Jersey, the practice appears to be widespread. In a recent survey conducted by the FDU PublicMind Poll for the Division of Highway Traffic Safety, 67% of respondents said they “very often” see people driving and talking on a hand held cell phone. 42% of respondents said they “very often” see driver’s texting. The campaign is being carried out during the month of April, which the National Safety Council has designated as Distracted Driving Awareness Month. The New Jersey campaign is modeled after similar successful high visibility enforcement programs such as Click It or Ticket and Drive Sober or Get Pulled Over.
    [Show full text]
  • Unbuckled in Back: an Overlooked Issue in Occupant Protection
    1. 2. Spotlight on ® Governors Highway Safety Association www.ghsa.org Highway Safety @GHSAHQ Unbuckled in Back: An Overlooked Issue in Occupant Protection Prepared for Governors Highway Safety Association by Dr. James Hedlund, Highway Safety North Unbuckled in Back: An Overlooked Issue in Occupant Protection Contents 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 INTRODUCTION 5 REAR SEAT BELT USE LAWS 7 REAR SEAT BELT USE RATES 12 CONSEQUENCES: LIVES LOST AND POTENTIAL LIVES SAVED 14 REAR SEAT BELT USE LAW ENFORCEMENT AND PROGRAMS 16 STRATEGIES TO INCREASE USE 19 REFERENCES 21 APPENDIX: POTENTIAL LIVES SAVED Acknowledgements Dr. James Hedlund conducted the analysis, researched and wrote the report. Jonathan Adkins, Executive Director, GHSA, and Kara Macek, Communications Director, GHSA, oversaw the report. Creative by Tony Frye Design. Spotlight on Highway Safety | Governors Highway Safety Association | 444 North Capitol Street | Suite 722 | Washington, DC 20001 2 Unbuckled in Back: An Overlooked Issue in Occupant Protection = 100 Fatalities In 2013, 883 unrestrained rear seat occupants age eight and older died in motor vehicle crashes. More than 400 of them would have survived if they had buckled up. Source: NHTSA Fatality Analysis Reporting System, 2013 data EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 2013, 883 unbelted rear seat passenger vehicle occupants age 8 and older died in traffic crashes in the United States. More than 400 of these occupants would have survived if they had worn their seat belts. Nationwide, rear seat belt use in 2013 was 78%, 9 percentage points lower than front seat belt use. Rear seat belt use was lower than front seat belt use in almost every state and was substantially lower in many states.
    [Show full text]
  • The NMDOT Traffic Safety Division Updates Driver Education Motor
    APR-JUN 2021 The NMDOT Traffic Safety Division Updates Driver Education SOURCE: https://www.myhighplains.com/news/new-mexico/new-mexico- department-of-transportation-traffic-safety-division-updates-driver-education/ The New Mexico Department of Transportation Traffic Safety Division (NMDOT TSD) is working with driving schools across the state to complete driver education training while adhering to health and safety orders. “The pandemic has forced a lot of families and driving schools to suspend driver education courses,” said Transportation Secretary Mike Sandoval. “Getting a license has also been an issue because students couldn’t complete their in-person driving instruction or make an appointment to test with the MVD offices to attain their licenses,” adds Sandoval. “Now that students can resume one-on one driving instruction, they can progress through the Graduated Driver Licensing system.” The NMDOT’s Traffic Safety Division (TSD) oversees all driver education programs statewide. All teens under the age of 18 must complete one of three programs to obtain a driver permit and license in New Mexico. • Teens may complete 30 hours of classroom instruction with seven hours of behind the wheel training with a certified instructor. This format is offered by private driving schools. • Complete 56 hours of classroom instruction. These are high school elective courses. • Complete 56 hours of NMDOT-approved correspondence education through a home-based program and students must apply for permission prior to enrollment. The department has directed, said the announcement, all driving schools to follow current emergency public health orders and COVID-19 safe practices and guidance. High schools are directed to provide a hybrid model of in-person instruction and virtual learning or complete virtual instruction.
    [Show full text]
  • Highway Safety Plan for Federal Fiscal Year 2022
    Success through partnerships Montana Section 402 Highway Safety Plan for Federal Fiscal Year 2022 Prepared by: Montana Department of Transportation State Highway Traffic Safety Section PO Box 201001/2701 Prospect Avenue Helena, Montana 59601 Online at http://www.mdt.mt.gov/visionzero/plans/safetyprg.shtml Table of Contents 1. MONTANA SHTSS PROGRAM OVERVIEW ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 2. LEGISLATIVE SESSION ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 3. HIGHWAY SAFETY PLANNING PROCESS .............................................................................................................................. 4 3.1 Outline of Montana’s Highway Safety Planning Process .............................................................................................. 4 3.2 Performance Measure and Target Setting Process ....................................................................................................... 6 3.3 State Highway Problem Identification .......................................................................................................................... 7 3.3.1 State Demographic Analysis ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Virginians' Self-Reported Perceptions of and Actions
    2011 Virginians’ Self-Reported Perceptions of and Actions Involving Targeted Safe-Driving Behaviors Final Report Prepared for: Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles’ Highway Safety Office By: Bryan E. Porter & Ann L. Edwards Department of Psychology Old Dominion University Norfolk, Virginia 23529-0267 [email protected] Table of Contents Acknowledgements .....................................................................................................................3 Summary.....................................................................................................................................4 Introduction ................................................................................................................................6 Procedures ..................................................................................................................................7 Survey .................................................................................................................................7 Sample Design and Preparations ..........................................................................................8 Data Collection....................................................................................................................9 Results ...................................................................................................................................... 11 Preliminary Considerations ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GTSC Highway Safety Strategic Plan
    2022 NEW YORK STATE FFY 2022 HIGHWAY SAFETY STRATEGIC PLAN New York State Governor’s Traffic Safety Committee Mark J. F. Schroeder, Commissioner New York State Department of Motor Vehicles Governor’s Traffic Safety Committee July 1, 2021 Revised August 19, 2021 NEW YORK STATE HIGHWAY SAFETY STRATEGIC PLAN FFY 2022 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Equity in Traffic Safety ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Highway Safety Program Planning Process ............................................................................................................. 2 Evidence-Based Traffic Safety Enforcement Program ............................................................................................ 9 Performance Report ............................................................................................................................................. 11 Performance Measures and Targets ........................................................................................................ 11 Statewide Performance Measures ........................................................................................................... 13 Status of New York’s Highway Safety Program ........................................................................................ 15 Performance Plan .................................................................................................................................................. 17 Highway
    [Show full text]
  • Click It Or Ticket Evaluation, 2010 DISCLAIMER
    DOT HS 811 778 May 2013 Click It or Ticket Evaluation, 2010 DISCLAIMER This publication is distributed by the U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, in the interest of information exchange. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Department of Transportation or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. If trade names, manufacturers’ names, or specific products are mentioned, it is because they are considered essential to the object of the publication and should not be construed as an endorsement. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Suggested APA Citation: Nichols, J. L., & Solomon, M. G. (2013, May). Click It or Ticket Evaluation, 2010. (Report No. DOT HS 811 778). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. DOT HS 811 778 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Click It or Ticket Evaluation, 2010 May 2013 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization James L. Nichols and Mark G. Solomon Report No. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Preusser Research Group, Inc. 7100 Main Street Trumbull, CT 06611 11. Contract or Grant No. DTNH22-09-D-00133 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and U.S. Department of Transportation Period Covered National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Abbreviations Explained 2018
    THSO ANNUAL TENNESSEE HIGHWAY SAFETY OFFICE REPORT 2018 ANNUAL REPORTFFY2018 Bill Haslam Governor, State of Tennessee David W. Purkey Commissioner,Tennessee Department of Safety & Homeland Security Vic Donoho Director, Tennessee Highway Safety Office TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Abbreviation Explanation 3 Director’s Message 4 Fiscal Year 2018 Highlights 6 Performance Measures/Targets 8 Vision and Mission 10 Planning and Administration 12 Community Outreach 14 Occupant Protection 16 Traffic Records 24 Alcohol and Other Drugs Countermeasures 26 Motorcycle Safety Program 30 Police Traffic Services 33 Law Enforcement Liaison Program 42 Network Coordinator Grants 43 Law Enforcement Training 46 Teen Traffic Safety Program 50 Distracted Driving 54 Senior Drivers 56 Pedestrian/Bicycle Safety 62 Emergency Medical Services 64 Paid Media 66 Earned Media 74 Legislative Update 79 Traffic Safety Partners 80 Evidence Based Enforcement Plan 82 Projects Not Implemented 86 Comprehensive Grant List 87 2 TENNESSEE HIGHWAY SAFETY OFFICE THSO ANNUAL REPORT ABBREVIATIONS EXPLAINED 2018 ABR. DESCRIPTION ARIDE Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Education LIDAR Light Imaging Detection and Ranging ATV All Terrain Vehicle MADD Mothers Against Drunk Driving CDC Centers for Disease Control MREP Motorcycle Rider Education Program CEU Continuing Education Unit NHTSA National Highway Traffic Safety Administration CIOT Click It or Ticket POST Police Officer Standards and Training CLIF Collegiate Life Investment Foundation PTS Police Traffic Services CPS Child
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Hearings Before the Committee on Appropriations
    S. HRG. 107–395 Senate Hearings Before the Committee on Appropriations Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations Fiscal Year 2002 107th CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION H.R. 2299/S. 1178 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (Amtrak) NONDEPARTMENTAL WITNESSES Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations, 2002 (H.R. 2299/S. 1178) S. HRG. 107–395 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND RELAT- ED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON H.R. 2299/S. 1178 AN ACT MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANS- PORTATION AND RELATED AGENCIES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2002, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES Department of Transportation General Accounting Office National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) Nondepartmental witnesses Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 70–867 PDF WASHINGTON : 2002 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS 1 TED STEVENS, Alaska, Chairman THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico ERNEST F. HOLLINGS, South Carolina CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky TOM HARKIN, Iowa CONRAD BURNS, Montana BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland RICHARD C.
    [Show full text]