Thursday, October 5, 2000
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
CANADA VOLUME 136 S NUMBER 127 S 2nd SESSION S 36th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Thursday, October 5, 2000 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire'' at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 8929 HOUSE OF COMMONS Thursday, October 5, 2000 The House met at 10 a.m. [Translation] _______________ HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT Prayers Ms. Raymonde Folco (Parliamentary Secretary to Minister of Human Resources Development, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I am _______________ pleased to table the government’s response to the report tabled on June 1, 2000 by the Standing Committee on Human Resources D (1000) Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities. This [English] report is entitled ‘‘Seeking a Balance: Final Report on Human Resources Development Canada Grants and Contributions’’. OFFICIAL LANGUAGES * * * The Deputy Speaker: Order, please. Pursuant to section 66 of the Official Languages Act I have the honour to table, in both INTERPARLIAMENTARY DELEGATIONS official languages, the annual report of the Commissioner of Official Languages covering the period between January 1, 1999 Mr. Maurice Dumas (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel, BQ): and March 31, 2000. Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 34(1), I have the honour to present to the House, in both official languages, the report of the [Translation] Canadian Group of the Inter-Parliamentary Union, which repre- Pursuant to Standing Order 108(4)(a), this report is deemed to sented Canada at the 103rd Inter-Parliamentary Conference, held in have been permanently referred to the Standing Joint Committee Amman, Jordan, from April 30 to May 6, 2000. on Official Languages. D (1005) _____________________________________________ [English] Mr. Bryon Wilfert (Oak Ridges, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, pursuant ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS to Standing Order 34(1) I have the honour to present to the House, in both official languages, the report of the chair of the Canada-Ja- [English] pan Interparliamentary Group annual visit to Diet members, Sep- tember 4 to 10, 2000. ORDER IN COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS Mr. Derek Lee (Parliamentary Secretary to Leader of the * * * Government in the House of Commons, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to table, in both official languages, a number of order in MARRIAGE (PROHIBITED DEGREES) ACT council appointments recently made by the government. Mr. Svend J. Robinson (Burnaby—Douglas, NDP) moved for Pursuant to the provisions of Standing Order 110(1) these are leave to introduce Bill C-501, an act to amend the Marriage deemed referred to the appropriate standing committees, a list of (Prohibited Degrees) Act (marriage between persons of the same which is attached. sex). He said: Mr. Speaker, I have the honour of tabling a bill today * * * which would amend federal law to recognize the right of gay and GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO PETITIONS lesbian people to marry. Currently federal common law restricts the institution of marriage to marriage between one man and one Mr. Derek Lee (Parliamentary Secretary to Leader of the woman. This is a clear denial of the right to equality for gay and Government in the House of Commons, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, lesbian people extended under the charter of rights and freedoms pursuant to Standing Order 36(8) I have the honour to table, in both which, by the way, was pioneered by the late Prime Minister Pierre official languages, the government’s response to two petitions. Elliott Trudeau. 8930 COMMONS DEBATES October 5, 2000 Routine Proceedings The time is long overdue for recognition that the relationships of of the official languages joint committee, encouraging that the city gay and lesbian people are just as strong, just as loving and just as of Ottawa, the capital of Canada, be officially bilingual. committed as those of heterosexual couples. The bill in no way diminishes the strength of heterosexual marriage. It does not in any The Deputy Speaker: Is there unanimous consent for the way affect the religious status of marriage. It would amend federal adoption of Motion No. 37 standing under government orders on law to ensure full equality for gay and lesbian couples and to the order paper? extend to those of us who are involved in relationships the right to marry under federal law. Some hon. members: Agreed. Some hon. members: No. (Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed) Mr. Jim Pankiw: Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. The Deputy Speaker: Would the hon. member for Saskatoon— Unanimous consent was denied to my request to introduce a bill Humboldt tell the Chair which of the bills standing in his name on today, but I believe that the hon. member who denied it may have the order paper he is proposing to introduce? misunderstood. In any case, I believe I do now have unanimous consent of the House to introduce the bill today. Mr. Jim Pankiw: Mr. Speaker, I gave notice of this on Friday. I The Deputy Speaker: Does the hon. member have unanimous am not sure exactly what number has been assigned to it. It is an act consent of the House to proceed with the bill at this time? to amend the Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act. Some hon. members: Agreed. The Deputy Speaker: I would like to inform the hon. member that the only bills we have on notice at the moment are an an act to * * * amend the Canada Elections Act (hours of polling in Saskatche- wan) and an act to amend the Parliament of Canada Act and the FEDERAL-PROVINCIAL FISCAL ARRANGEMENTS ACT Canada Elections Act (fixed election dates). Mr. Jim Pankiw (Saskatoon—Humboldt, Canadian Alliance) I understand that notice may have been given yesterday of a bill moved for leave to introduce Bill C-502, an act to amend the and if that is the case it would not be on the order paper for Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act (work for welfare). introduction until tomorrow. He said: Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank my hon. colleagues I am told the hon. member did file his notice on Friday last, after for extending me the courtesy of introducing this bill today. The 2.30. Because the notice time had closed and since the House did purpose of the bill is to require that every province will have in not sit on Monday or Tuesday it does not count as notice time, so he effect a work for welfare program. has to wait the appropriate time. It counts as having been delivered (Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed) yesterday for that purpose because he was too late on the Friday. That is why there is this delay. He will be able to do it tomorrow. * * * Mr. Jim Pankiw: Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I realize now what has happened. Obviously as a result of the death of a COMMITTEES OF THE HOUSE former Prime Minister the House did not sit on Monday and Tuesday, so that is why this has happened. Rather than having to JUSTICE AND HUMAN RIGHTS wait until tomorrow, I wonder if I could have unanimous consent of the House to introduce it today in light of the circumstances. Mr. Peter Mancini (Sydney—Victoria, NDP) moved that the fifth report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, presented on Wednesday, June 7, 2000, be concurred in. D (1010) He said: Mr. Speaker, I rise today to move concurrence in that The Deputy Speaker: Does the House give its consent for the report and by way of background to indicate exactly why I am hon. member to proceed with the introduction of this bill? doing that. I have very real concerns. I know those concerns would be shared by other members of the justice committee, and certainly Some hon. members: Agreed. by other members of my party. In June of this year the justice committee met to discuss a private An hon. member: No. member’s bill dealing with the Westray mine disaster. The justice committee considered that bill. A motion was moved by me. A Mr. Mauril Bélanger: Mr. Speaker, I rise today, as I did great deal of work was done by the hon. member for Pictou—Anti- yesterday, to seek unanimous consent to adopt without debate gonish—Guysborough. There has been a great deal of work done Motion No. 37, which would seek concurrence in the second report on this bill by the leader of my party, the hon. member for Halifax, October 5, 2000 COMMONS DEBATES 8931 Routine Proceedings and by the hon. member for Churchill in Manitoba. This issue is There is no question that if this act had been done by an individual not just an Atlantic issue. It crosses all lines. There has also been a there would have been a charge of homicide. Because it is a great deal of work done by the hon. member for Winnipeg Centre, corporation and because of all kinds of legal implications coming our justice critic. from that, justice has never been achieved. At the justice committee there was a rare and I think unique In his report, Justice Richard recommended very clearly that feeling when the committee determined that the justice department there be a new criminal offence that would impose criminal should bring back to the committee a bill giving substance to the liabilities on directors and other responsible corporate agents for spirit of the report filed after the Westray disaster. failing to ensure that their corporation maintained an appropriate standard of occupational health and safety in the workplace, that There are rules that determine when the minister can respond to there be a criminal offence of corporate killing.