DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law Volume 12 Issue 2 Fall 2002 Article 6 Clear Channel v. Competition Act of 2002: Is There A Clear End in Sight? Sarah Greene Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/jatip Recommended Citation Sarah Greene, Clear Channel v. Competition Act of 2002: Is There A Clear End in Sight?, 12 DePaul J. Art, Tech. & Intell. Prop. L. 387 (2002) Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/jatip/vol12/iss2/6 This Legislative Updates is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law by an authorized editor of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Greene: Clear Channel v. Competition Act of 2002: Is There A Clear End in LEGISLATIVE UPDATE CLEAR CHANNEL V. COMPETITION ACT OF 2002: IS THERE A CLEAR END IN SIGHT? I. INTRODUCTION Senator Russell Feingold (D-WI) recently introduced a new bill to amend the Communications Act of 1934, entitled 'the "Competition in Radio and Concert Industries Act of 2002" ("Competition Act").' The Act is -designed to "increase programming and content on radio that is locally and independently produced, to facilitate competition in radio programming, radio advertising, and concerts, and for other purposes."' The Competition Act aims to reverse the negative 1. S. 2691, 107th Cong. (2002), available athttp://thomas.loc.gov. 2. The full text of the Act is as follows: