Natamycin in the Treatment of Fungal Keratitis: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Natamycin in the Treatment of Fungal Keratitis: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 陨灶贼允韵责澡贼澡葬造皂燥造熏灾燥造援 8熏晕燥援 3熏 Jun.18, 圆园15 www.IJO.cn 栽藻造押8629原愿圆圆源缘员苑圆 8629-82210956 耘皂葬蚤造押ijopress岳员远猿援糟燥皂 窑InformaticsResearch窑 Natamycininthetreatmentoffungalkeratitis:a systematicreviewandMeta-analysis 1 DepartmentofOphthalmology,MedicalCollege,Qingdao · KEYWORDS: eyeinfection;fungal;natamycin;Meta- University,Qingdao266071,ShandongProvince,China analysis 2DepartmentofOphthalmology,theAffiliatedHospitalof DOI:10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2015.03.29 QingdaoUniversity,Qingdao266003,ShandongProvince, China QiuS,ZhaoGQ,LinJ,WangX,HuLT,DuZD,WangQ,ZhuCC. Correspondence to: Gui-QiuZhao. Departmentof Natamycininthetreatmentoffungalkeratitis:asystematicreviewand Ophthalmology,theAffiliatedHospitalofQingdao Meta-analysis. 2015;8(3):597-602 University,Qingdao266003,ShangdongProvince,China. [email protected] INTRODUCTION Received:2014-11-07 Accepted:2015-01-09 ungalkeratitisisaleadingcauseofblindnessincorneal F diseases,whichisrelativelycommoninwarmclimates [1-3] Abstract anddevelopingcountries .Recentreportssuggestthe prevalenceforfungalketatitiswasincreasing [4,5].Astudy ·AIM:Toreviewpublishedclinicalstudiesexaminingthe reportedthatfungalulcersasaseriouspublichealthproblem effectofnatamycininthetreatmentoffungalkeratitis. innorthChina,inwhichthedominatingpathogenwasgenus ·METHODS:WeselectedthepublicationsinCENTRAL, (77.6%),andthesecondcommonpathogenwas [6] MEDLINE, EMBASE, CNKI, and CBM. This study genus (10.8%) .Moreover,bothof systematicallyreviewedpublishedrandomizedcontrolled and weremostlysensitivetonatamycin.Fungal trials(RCTs)thatcomparednatamycintootherantifungal keratitisresultsinseverevisualimpairment,andthe agents,andconductedfeasibleMeta-analysisofefficacy treatmentismoredifficultthanothercornealinfections [7,8]. resultsusingRevman5.2software. Thegoldstandardforthetreatmentoffungalkeratitishas [9,10] ·RESULTS:Weincludedseventrialswhichweremainly notbeenidentified ,andthemainmanagementis antifungalagentsinvolvingtopicantifungaldropssuchas carriedoutindevelopingcountriesofAsia,withfive natamycinandtopicalamphotericinB.Foracutecorneal trialsconducted in India, oneeach in China and perforationandvisualrehabilitation,therapeuticpenetrating Bangladesh.Atotalof804participantswererandomized keratoplastyisneeded. tofollowingcomparisons:2%econazoleversus5% natamycinshowedlittledifferenceintheeffectsof Theantifungalagentsusedfortreatmentoffungalkeratitis treatmentoffungalkeratitis [RR=0.99,95%confidence includethreeclasses:polyenes,triazoles,andechinocandins. interval(CI),0.8to1.21];chlorhexidinegluconateversus Natamycinisatetraenepolyenewhichhasbeenregardedas 5%natamycinindicatedthattheresultsonhealingofthe themostimportantagentinthemanagementoffungal ulcerat21dwaslessconclusive(RR=0.77,95%CI,0.55 keratitis.Itactsbybindingwithergosterol,whichisan to1.08; 2 =0%);1%voriconazoleversus5%natamycin essentialcomponentinfungalcellwall,andblocksfungal suggestedthatnatamycintreatmentappearedtobe growth.Natamycinis theonlyantifungalmedication significantlybetteroutcomesthanvoriconazole(regression approvedbyU.S.FoodandDrugAdministration [11].There coefficient=-0.18logMAR;95%CI,-0.30to-0.05; = werepreviousstudiesreportingtheefficacyofnatamycin 0.006), especially in cases (regression andcomparingitwithotheragentsinmanagementoffungal coefficient=-0.41logMAR;95%CI,-0.61to-0.20; <0.001); keratitis,buttheresultswerenotcompletelyconsistent. natamycin versus fluconazole showed a significant FlorCruz [9] reportedthatthereisnoevidencetodate differenceincurerate( 2=5.048, <0.05)andnatamycin thatanyparticulardrug,orcombinationofdrugs,ismore groupwasmoreeffectivethanfluconazoleinaverage effectiveinthetreatmentoffungalkeratitis.Therefore,a periodoftherapy( =7.94, <0.01). systematicreviewofavailablereportswillconducetothe ·CONCLUSION:Natamycinwasapreferablechoicein evidencebase,andweperformedthisMeta-analysisto thetreatmentoffungalkeratitis,especiallyintheearly assesstheefficacyofnatamycininthetreatmentoffungal periodof cases. keratitis. 597 Natamycininthetreatmentoffungalkeratitis MATERIALSANDMETHODS reachaconsensusamongtheinvestigators.Thefollowing Search Strategy Wesearched thepublicationsin datawerecollectedfromeachstudy:1)publicationdata:the CENTRAL (whichcontainstheCochraneEyesandVision firstauthor'slastname,yearofpublication,countryof GroupTrialsRegister)(TheCochraneLibrary2014,Issue origin;2)characteristicsoftheparticipants:thesetting, 1),Medline,Embase,CNKI (ChinaNationalKnowledge samplesize,gender,age;3)interventions:natamycin,other Infrastructure), CBM (ChineseBiologicalMedicine antifungalagents,doseofmedication,andadministration Database),followingtheCochrane'shighlysensitivesearch route;4)follow-uptime;5)outcomemeasurement:the strategyandusedrelevantkeywordsandmedicalsubject numberofhealedorhealingulcerstreatedwithnatamycinor heading(MeSH)terms,including"natamycinorpimaricin" otheragents,thenumberofotheroutcomesandthe and"eyeinfections,fungal""antifungalagents".Wealso complications. handsearchedthereferencelistsofidentifiedtrialreportsand WeusedReviewManager5.2forMeta-analysis.We casereportsfortofindrelevantarticles.Therewereon calculatedarelativeriskratiofordichotomousdataandthe languagerestrictionsinthesearchfortrials. weightedmeandifferenceforcontinuousdata.Wecalculated TrialSelection Tworeviewers (QiuSandWangX) thepointestimateandconfidenceintervals(CIs)witha95% independentlyscannedthetitlesandabstractstoexcludethe CIforeachresult.Weevaluatedthestatisticalheterogeneity trialswhichwereobviouslynotconformtotheinclusion byCochrane 2 testsandqualifieditbycalculatingthe criteria.Fulltextreportsofthestudiesthatdefinitelyor 2 statistic.Ifsignificantheterogeneitywasobserved possiblymettheinclusioncriteriawereexaminedforfurther betweenstudies( 2>50%),arandom-effectsmodelwasused assessment.Theycrosscheckedintotheresults,and topoolthedata;otherwise,afixed-effectsmodelwasused. determinedthatwhetherthepapershouldbeexcludedor Weconsideredtoconductingasensitivityanalysisby includedbydiscussionorthethirdreviewer.Wealso excludingstudieswhichwereathighriskofbiasinthe contactedwiththeauthorstoperfectourdata. protocol,butthecurrentstudydoesnotincludemanymore Theinclusioncriteriaincluded:1)type InclusionCriteria Meta-analysissoitwasnotdone.Ifpossiblewewilldo of studies:randomizedcontrolledtrials(RCTs)that furthersensitivityanalysis,sothatwecanjudgethe comparedefficacyofnatamycinwithcontrolorother importanceof reviewresultstocrucialdecisionsand antifungaleyedrop;2)typeofparticipants:allagepatients assumptionsthatwehavemadeduringthereview.Data withfungal keratitis diagnosed clinicallyor analysiswillberepeatedwiththefollowingmethods: microbiologically,andweexcludedthepatientsinfectedby exclusionoftrialsathighriskofbias;exclusionof mixedbacteriaandfungi;3)typeofinterventions:we unpublishedstudies;changinginclusioncriteriaofthe considered studiesusing different concentrationsof studies,participants,interventionsoroutcomemeasures; natamycininthetreatmentoffungalkeratitis.Thisincluded reanalyzingthedatausinganotherstatisticalapproach,such placebocontrolledtrialsortrialscomparingnatamycinto asusingarandom-effectsmodelinsteadofafixed-effects otherantifungalagents;4)typeofoutcomemeasures:a) model. primaryoutcomes:bestspectacle-correctedvisualacuity (BSCVA)at3mo;b)secondaryoutcomes:thetimetobe RESULTS Figure1showedtheselectionofeligible definedasahealedorhealingulcer;thesafetyof StudiesSelection medication;complicationincludingscarsize,perforations; studies.Weidentified493articlesthroughprimaryliterature assessmentandpresenceorabsenceoftoxicityafter search.Twohundredandtwelvearticleswereselectedto treatment. screentheabstractandtitles.Afterthat,198articleswere excludedand14potentialrelevantarticleswereobtainedfor AssessmentofRiskofBias Theriskofbiasinthe includedstudieswasassessedinaccordancewithCochrane fulltextreview.Finally,7eligiblestudieswereincludedfor [11-17] handbook.Twoauthors(QiuSandWangX)independently thesystematicreviewandMeta-analysis . assessed theriskbiasofstudiesand resolvedthe Study Characteristics Table1summarizes the disagreementbydiscussion.Eachbiasdomainlistedinthe characteristicofthe7includedstudies.Atotalof804 Cochraneriskofbiastoolwasassessedandgradedas"low patientswith804eyesin7includedtrialswereenrolledin riskofbias","highriskofbias"and"unclear".Weneedto thisreview.Thebaselinecharacteristicsaresummarizedas contacttheauthorsforillustrationofanyparametergraded follows. The countries of participantsweremainly asunclear. developingcountriesinAsia (5inIndia [11-13,15,17],1eachin [14] [16] DataExtractionandAnalysis Tworeviewers(QiuSand China andBangladesh ).Samplesizewasrangefrom WangX)independentlyimplementedthedataextractionthat 30-323eyes.Themeanageofparticipantswas43.49y,and mettheinclusioncriteria.Thefulltextsofselectedtrials 64%weremale.Thefollow-uptimewasrangefrom21dto werereadtodeterminewhethertheycontaineduseful 3mo.Allthetrialstestedtheefficacyofnatamycinby information.Anydisagreementwasresolvedbydiscussionto comparingwithotherantifungaldrugs.Only1studytested 598 陨灶贼允韵责澡贼澡葬造皂燥造熏灾燥造援 8熏晕燥援 3熏 Jun.18, 圆园15 www.IJO.cn 栽藻造押8629原愿圆圆源缘员苑圆 8629-82210956 耘皂葬蚤造押ijopress岳员远猿援糟燥皂 Table 1 Basic characteristics of included trials Mean age± SD (a) M/F Study (a) Country n NAT Control Overall NAT Control Overall Prajna et al[12] (2013) India 323 NS NS NS NS NS NS Arora et al[11] (2011) India 30 37.93±15.14 48.47±3.53 NS 10/5 11/4 21/9 Prajna et al[13] (2010) India 120 49.8±11.9 47.0±14.5 NS 42/18 37/23 79/41 45.4±15.38 46.7±15.56 Wang et al[14] (2010) China 84 NS 23/19 22/20 NS (20-66) (5-72) 37.0±13.8 Prajna et al[15] (2003) India 116 NS NS NS NS
Recommended publications
  • Pharmacokinetics of Salicylic Acid Following Intravenous and Oral Administration of Sodium Salicylate in Sheep
    animals Article Pharmacokinetics of Salicylic Acid Following Intravenous and Oral Administration of Sodium Salicylate in Sheep Shashwati Mathurkar 1,*, Preet Singh 2 ID , Kavitha Kongara 2 and Paul Chambers 2 1 1B, He Awa Crescent, Waikanae 5036, New Zealand 2 School of Veterinary Sciences, College of Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North 4474, New Zealand; [email protected] (P.S.); [email protected] (K.K.); [email protected] (P.C.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +64-221-678-035 Received: 13 June 2018; Accepted: 16 July 2018; Published: 18 July 2018 Simple Summary: Scarcity of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) to minimise the pain in sheep instigated the current study. The aim of this study was to know the pharmacokinetic parameters of salicylic acid in New Zealand sheep after administration of multiple intravenous and oral doses of sodium salicylate (sodium salt of salicylic acid). Results of the study suggest that the half-life of the drug was shorter and clearance was faster after intravenous administration as compared to that of the oral administration. The minimum effective concentration required to produce analgesia in humans (16.8 µL) was achieved in sheep for about 0.17 h in the current study after intravenous administration of 100 and 200 mg/kg body weight of sodium salicylate. However, oral administration of these doses failed to achieve the minimum effective concentration as mentioned above. This study is of significance as it adds valuable information on pharmacokinetics and its variation due to breed, species, age, gender and environmental conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • 204684Orig1s000
    CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: 204684Orig1s000 OFFICE DIRECTOR MEMO Deputy Office Director Decisional Memo Page 2 of 17 NDA 204,684 Miltefosine Capsules 1. Introduction Leishmania organisms are intracellular protozoan parasites that are transmitted to a mammalian host by the bite of the female phlebotomine sandfly. The main clinical syndromes are visceral leishmaniasis (VL), cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), and mucosal leishmaniasis (ML). VL is the result of systemic infection and is progressive over months or years. Clinical manifestations include fever, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, and bone marrow involvement with pancytopenia. VL is fatal if untreated. Liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome®) was FDA approved in 1997 for the treatment of VL. CL usually presents as one or more skin ulcers at the site of the sandfly bite. In most cases, the ulcer spontaneously resolves within several months, leaving a scar. The goals of therapy are to accelerate healing, decrease morbidity and decrease the risk of relapse, local dissemination, or mucosal dissemination. There are no FDA approved drugs for the treatment of CL. Rarely, CL disseminates from the skin to the naso-oropharyngeal mucosa, resulting in ML. ML can also develop some time after CL spontaneous ulcer healing. The risk of ML is thought to be highest with CL caused by the subgenus Viannia. ML is characterized in the medical literature as progressive with destruction of nasal and pharyngeal structures, and death may occur due to complicating aspiration pneumonia. There are no FDA approved drugs for the treatment of ML. Paladin Therapeutics submitted NDA 204, 684 seeking approval of miltefosine for the treatment of VL caused by L.
    [Show full text]
  • Systemic Antifungal Drug Use in Belgium—
    Received: 7 October 2018 | Revised: 28 March 2019 | Accepted: 14 March 2019 DOI: 10.1111/myc.12912 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Systemic antifungal drug use in Belgium—One of the biggest antifungal consumers in Europe Berdieke Goemaere1 | Katrien Lagrou2,3* | Isabel Spriet4,5 | Marijke Hendrickx1 | Eline Vandael6 | Pierre Becker1 | Boudewijn Catry6,7 1BCCM/IHEM Fungal Collection, Service of Mycology and Aerobiology, Sciensano, Summary Brussels, Belgium Background: Reports on the consumption of systemic antifungal drugs on a national 2 Department of Microbiology and level are scarce although of high interest to compare trends and the associated epi- Immunology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium 3Clinical Department of Laboratory demiology in other countries and to assess the need for antifungal stewardship Medicine, National Reference Centre for programmes. Mycosis, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Objectives: To estimate patterns of Belgian inpatient and outpatient antifungal use 4Department of Pharmaceutical and and provide reference data for other countries. Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Methods: Consumption records of antifungals were collected in Belgian hospitals Leuven, Belgium between 2003 and 2016. Primary healthcare data were available for the azoles for 5Pharmacy Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium the period 2010-2016. 6 Healthcare‐Associated Infections and Results: The majority of the antifungal consumption resulted from prescriptions of Antimicrobial Resistance, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium fluconazole and itraconazole in the ambulatory care while hospitals were responsible 7Faculty of Medicine, Université Libre de for only 6.4% of the total national consumption and echinocandin use was limited. Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium The annual average antifungal consumption in hospitals decreased significantly by Correspondence nearly 25% between 2003 and 2016, due to a decrease solely in non-university hos- Berdieke Goemaere, Sciensano, Mycology pitals.
    [Show full text]
  • NATACYN® (Natamycin Ophthalmic Suspension) 5% Sterile
    NATACYN® (natamycin ophthalmic suspension) 5% Sterile DESCRIPTION: NATACYN® (natamycin ophthalmic suspension) 5% is a sterile, antifungal drug for topical ophthalmic administration. Each mL of NATACYN® (natamycin ophthalmic suspension) contains: Active: natamycin 5% (50 mg). Preservative: benzalkonium chloride 0.02%. Inactive: sodium hydroxide and/or hydrochloric acid (neutralized to adjust the pH), purified water. The active ingredient is represented by the chemical structure: Established Name: Natamycin Molecular Formula: C33H47NO13 Molecular Weight: 665.73 g/mol Chemical Name: Stereoisomer of 22-[(3-amino-3,6-dideoxy- β-D-mannopyranosyl)oxy]-1,3,26- trihydroxy-12-methyl-10-oxo-6,11,28-trioxatricyclo[22.3.1.05,7] octacosa-8,14,16,18,20-pentaene-25- carboxylic acid. Other: Pimaricin The pH range is 5.0-7.5. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY: Natamycin is a tetraene polyene antibiotic derived from Streptomyces natalensis. It possesses in vitro activity against a variety of yeast and filamentous fungi, including Candida, Aspergillus, Cephalosporium, Fusarium and Penicillium. The mechanism of action appears to be through binding of the molecule to the sterol moiety of the fungal cell membrane. The polyenesterol complex alters the permeability of the membrane to produce depletion of essential cellular constituents. Although the activity against fungi is dose-related, natamycin is predominantly fungicidal. Natamycin is not effective in vitro against gram-positive or gram- negative bacteria. Topical administration appears to produce effective concentrations of natamycin within the corneal stroma but not in intraocular fluid. Systemic absorption should not be expected following topical administration of NATACYN® (natamycin ophthalmic suspension) 5%. As with other polyene antibiotics, absorption from the gastrointestinal tract is very poor.
    [Show full text]
  • Infectious Keratitis: Short Answers
    Q Infectious keratitis: Short answers What is the #1 bacterium in CL-related K ulcer? A Infectious keratitis: Short answers What is the #1 bacterium in CL-related K ulcer? Pseudomonas Infectious keratitis: Short answers Pseudomonas corneal ulcer associated with CL wear Q Infectious keratitis: Short answers What is the #1 bacterium in CL-related K ulcer? Pseudomonas What is the #1 risk factor for Acanthamoeba keratitis? A Infectious keratitis: Short answers What is the #1 bacterium in CL-related K ulcer? Pseudomonas What is the #1 risk factor for Acanthamoeba keratitis? CL wear Infectious keratitis: Short answers Acanthamoeba keratitis associated with CL wear Q Infectious keratitis: Short answers What is the #1 bacterium in CL-related K ulcer? Pseudomonas What is the #1 risk factor for Acanthamoeba keratitis? CL wear What are the three main culprits in fungal keratitis? What is the topical antifungal of choice for each? Fusarium:fungus 1 Topical…natamycin Aspergillisfungus 2 and Candida:fungus 3 A Infectious keratitis: Short answers What is the #1 bacterium in CL-related K ulcer? Pseudomonas What is the #1 risk factor for Acanthamoeba keratitis? CL wear What are the three main culprits in fungal keratitis? What is the topical antifungal of choice for each? Candida: Topical…natamycin Aspergillis and Fusarium: Q Infectious keratitis: Short answers What is the #1 bacterium in CL-related K ulcer? Pseudomonas What is the #1 risk factor for Acanthamoeba keratitis? CL wear What are the three main culprits in fungal keratitis?
    [Show full text]
  • Updates in Ocular Antifungal Pharmacotherapy: Formulation and Clinical Perspectives
    Current Fungal Infection Reports (2019) 13:45–58 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12281-019-00338-6 PHARMACOLOGY AND PHARMACODYNAMICS OF ANTIFUNGAL AGENTS (N BEYDA, SECTION EDITOR) Updates in Ocular Antifungal Pharmacotherapy: Formulation and Clinical Perspectives Ruchi Thakkar1,2 & Akash Patil1,2 & Tabish Mehraj1,2 & Narendar Dudhipala1,2 & Soumyajit Majumdar1,2 Published online: 2 May 2019 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Purpose of Review In this review, a compilation on the current antifungal pharmacotherapy is discussed, with emphases on the updates in the formulation and clinical approaches of the routinely used antifungal drugs in ocular therapy. Recent Findings Natamycin (Natacyn® eye drops) remains the only approved medication in the management of ocular fungal infections. This monotherapy shows therapeutic outcomes in superficial ocular fungal infections, but in case of deep-seated mycoses or endophthalmitis, successful therapeutic outcomes are infrequent, as a result of which alternative therapies are sought. In such cases, amphotericin B, azoles, and echinocandins are used off-label, either in combination with natamycin or with each other (frequently) or as standalone monotherapies, and have provided effective therapeutic outcomes. Summary In recent times, amphotericin B, azoles, and echinocandins have come to occupy an important niche in ocular antifungal pharmacotherapy, along with natamycin (still the preferred choice in most clinical cases), in the management of ocular fungal infections.
    [Show full text]
  • Natamycin Ophthalmic Suspension)5% Sterile
    NDA 50-514/S-009 Page 3 Natacyn® (natamycin ophthalmic suspension)5% Sterile DESCRIPTION: NATACYN® (natamycin ophthalmic suspension) 5% is a sterile, antifungal drug for topical ophthalmic administration. Each mL of the suspension contains: Active: natamycin 5% (50mg). Preservative: benzalkonium chloride 0.02%. Inactive: sodium hydroxide and/or hydrochloric acid (neutralized to adjust the pH), purified water. The active ingredient is represented by the chemical structure: Established name: Natamycin Chemical Structure Molecular Formula: C33H47NO13 Molecular Weight: 665.73 Chemical name: Stereoisomer of 22-[(3-amino-3,6-dideoxy- β-D-mannopyranosyl)oxy]-1,3,26­ trihydroxy-12- methyl-10-oxo-6,11,28- trioxatricyclo[22.3.1.05,7] octacosa-8,14,16,18,20-pentaene-25-carboxylic acid. Other: Pimaricin The pH range is 5.0 – 7.5. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY: Natamycin is a tetraene polyene antibiotic derived from Streptomyces natalensis. It possesses in vitro activity against a variety of yeast and filamentous fungi, including Candida, Aspergillus, Cephalosporium, Fusarium and Penicillium. The mechanism of action appears to be through binding of the molecule to the sterol moiety of the fungal cell membrane. The polyenesterol complex alters the permeability of the membrane to produce depletion of essential cellular constituents. Although the activity against fungi is dose-related, natamycin is predominantly fungicidal.* Natamycin is not effective in vitro against gram-positive or gram-negative bacteria. Topical administration appears to produce effective concentrations of natamycin within the corneal stroma but not in intraocular fluid. Systemic absorption should not be expected following topical administration of NATACYN® (natamycin ophthalmic suspension) 5%. As with other polyene antibiotics, absorption from the gastrointestinal tract is very poor.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhanced Activity of Antifungal Drugs Using Natural Phenolics Against Yeast Strains of Candida and Cryptococcus N.C.G.Faria1, J.H
    Letters in Applied Microbiology ISSN 0266-8254 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Enhanced activity of antifungal drugs using natural phenolics against yeast strains of Candida and Cryptococcus N.C.G.Faria1, J.H. Kim3, L.A.P. Gonc¸alves2, M. de L. Martins1, K.L. Chan3 and B.C. Campbell3 1 Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical ⁄ CREM, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal 2 Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical ⁄ CEAUL, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal 3 Plant Mycotoxin Research Unit, Western Regional Research Center, ARS-USDA, Albany, CA, USA Keywords Abstract amphotericin B, phenolic, synergism, triazole. Aims: Determine whether certain, natural phenolic compounds enhance activ- Correspondence ity of commercial antifungal drugs against yeast strains of Candida and Crypto- Bruce C. Campbell, Plant Mycotoxin Research coccus neoformans. Unit, Western Regional Research Center, Methods and Results: Twelve natural phenolics were examined for fungicidal USDA-ARS, 800 Buchanan Street, Albany, CA activity against nine reference strains of Candida and one of C. neoformans. Six 94710, USA. compounds were selected for synergistic enhancement of antifungal drugs, E-mail: [email protected] amphotericin B (AMB), fluconazole (FLU) and itraconazole (ITR). Matrix assays 2010 ⁄ 1438: received 19 August 2010, revised of phenolic and drug combinations conducted against one reference strain, each, 14 February 2011 and accepted 15 February of Candida albicans and C. neoformans showed cinnamic and benzoic acids, thy- 2011 mol, and 2,3- and 2,5-dihydroxybenzaldehydes (-DBA) had synergistic interac- tions depending upon drug and yeast strain. 2,5-DBA was synergistic with doi:10.1111/j.1472-765X.2011.03032.x almost all drug and strain combinations.
    [Show full text]
  • Antifungal Drugs
    Antifungal Drugs Antifungal or antimycotic drugs are those agents used to treat diseases caused by fungus. Fungicides are drugs which destroy fungus and fungistatic drugs are those which prevent growth and multiplication of fungi. Collectively these drugs are often referred to as antimycotic or antifungal drugs. General characteristics of fungus: Fungi of medical significance are of two groups: Yeast Unicellular (Candida, Crytococcus) Molds Multicellular; filamentous consist of hyphae (Aspergillus, Microsporum, Trichophyton) They are eukaryotic i.e. they have well defined nucleus and other nuclear materials. They are made of thin threads called hyphae. The hyphae have a cell wall (like plant cells) made of a material called chitin. The hyphae are often multinucleate. They do not have chlorophyll, can’t make own food by photosynthesis, therefore derive nutrients by means of saprophytic or parasitic existence. Cell membrane is made up of ergosterol. Types of fungal infections: Fungal infections are termed as mycoses and in general can be divided into: Superficial infections: Affecting skin, nails, scalp or mucous membranes; e.g. Tinea versicolor Dermatophytosis: Fungi that affect keratin layer of skin, hair and nail; e.g. Tinea pedis, rign worm infection. Candidiasis: Yeast infections caused by (Malassezia pachydermatis), oral thrush (oral candidiasis), vulvo-vaginitis, nail infection. Systemic/Deep infections: Affecting deeper tissues and organ they usually affect lungs, heart and brain leading to pneumonia, endocarditis and meningitis. Systemic infections are associated with immunocompromised patients, these diseases are serious and often life threatening due to the organ involved. Some of the serious systemic fungal infections in man are candidiasis, cryptococcal meningitis, pulmonary aspergillosis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Amphotericin B Alone and in Combination with Different Antibiotics and Antifungals on Biofilms Produced by Candida Species
    FABAD J. Pharm. Sci., 45, 2, 117-124, 2020 RESEARCH ARTICLE The Role of Amphotericin B Alone and in Combination with Different Antibiotics and Antifungals on Biofilms Produced by Candida Species Mayram HACIOGLU*° , Ozlem OYARDI** , Berna OZBEK-CELIK*** The Role of Amphotericin B Alone and in Combination with Amfoterisin B’nin Tek Başına ve Çeşitli Antibiyotik ve Different Antibiotics and Antifungals on Biofilms Produced Antifungallerle Birlikte Candida Biyofilmleri Üzerine Etkisi by Candida Species SUMMARY ÖZ Biofilm formation by Candida species is highly resistant to commonly Biyofilm oluşumu Candida türlerinde antifungallere daha dirençli used antifungal agents and is difficult to treat. Therefore, this study olmalarını sağladığından tedavisi güç enfeksiyonlara neden focused on effectiveness of combination therapy against Candida olmaktadır. Bu amaçla, bu çalışmada Candida biyofilmlerine biofilms. The antimicrobial activities of amphotericin B (1 µg/ karşı kombinasyon tedavisinin etkinliği araştırılmıştır. ml or 10 µg/ml) alone or in combination with various antibiotics Amfoterisin B’nin (1 µg / ml veya 10 µg / ml) tek başına veya (doxycycline (20 µg/ml), tigecycline (20 µg/ml), colistin (30 µg/ml), çeşitli antibiyotiklerle [(doksisiklin (20 µg / ml), tigesiklin (20 µg / rifampicin (120 µg/ml), ciprofloxacin (20 µg/ml)) or antifungals ml), kolistin (30 µg / ml), rifampisin (120 µg / ml), siprofloksasin (clotrimazole (2.5 µg/ml), anidulafungin (10 µg/ml), caspofungin (20 µg / ml)] veya çeşitli antifungaller [(klotrimazol (2.5 µg / ml), (10 µg/ml), itraconazole (2.5 µg/ml) and fluconazole (10 µg/ml)) anidulafungin (10 µg / ml), kaspofungin (10 µg / ml), itrakonazol were investigated against fungal biofilms produced by C. albicans (2.5 µg / ml), flukonazol (10 µg/ml)] ile kombinasyonlarının SC5314, C.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Art of Antimicrobial Edible Coatings for Food Packaging Applications
    coatings Review State of the Art of Antimicrobial Edible Coatings for Food Packaging Applications Arantzazu Valdés, Marina Ramos, Ana Beltrán, Alfonso Jiménez and María Carmen Garrigós * Analytical Chemistry, Nutrition & Food Sciences Department, University of Alicante, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig (Alicante), Spain; [email protected] (A.V.); [email protected] (M.R.); [email protected] (A.B.); [email protected] (A.J.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-96-590-3400 (ext. 1242); Fax: +34-96-590-3697 Academic Editor: Stefano Farris Received: 6 January 2017; Accepted: 10 April 2017; Published: 19 April 2017 Abstract: The interest for the development of new active packaging materials has rapidly increased in the last few years. Antimicrobial active packaging is a potential alternative to protect perishable products during their preparation, storage and distribution to increase their shelf-life by reducing bacterial and fungal growth. This review underlines the most recent trends in the use of new edible coatings enriched with antimicrobial agents to reduce the growth of different microorganisms, such as Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, molds and yeasts. The application of edible biopolymers directly extracted from biomass (proteins, lipids and polysaccharides) or their combinations, by themselves or enriched with natural extracts, essential oils, bacteriocins, metals or enzyme systems, such as lactoperoxidase, have shown interesting properties to reduce the contamination and decomposition of perishable food products, mainly fish, meat, fruits and vegetables. These formulations can be also applied to food products to control gas exchange, moisture permeation and oxidation processes. Keywords: antimicrobial; edible coatings; food packaging 1. Introduction The search for more natural and healthy food, based on minimally-processed, easily-prepared and ready-to-eat fresh products, has resulted in an increase in consumer requirements for safe and high-quality food [1].
    [Show full text]
  • (Oral and Vaginal) Therapy for Recurrent Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: a Systematic Review Protocol
    Open access Protocol BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027489 on 22 May 2019. Downloaded from Antifungal (oral and vaginal) therapy for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis: a systematic review protocol Juliana Lírio,1 Paulo Cesar Giraldo,2 Rose Luce Amaral,2 Ayane Cristine Alves Sarmento,3 Ana Paula Ferreira Costa,3 Ana Katherine Gonçalves3 To cite: Lírio J, Giraldo PC, ABSTRACT Strengths and limitations of this study Amaral RL, et al. Antifungal Introduction Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is frequent (oral and vaginal) therapy in women worldwide and usually responds rapidly to for recurrent vulvovaginal ► Two independent reviewers will select studies, ex- topical or oral antifungal therapy. However, some women candidiasis: a systematic tract data without different variables and assess develop recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC), which review protocol. BMJ Open the risk of bias, to indicate through evidence-based 2019;9:e027489. doi:10.1136/ is arbitrarily defined as four or more episodes every medicine if there is a more effective antifungal ther- bmjopen-2018-027489 year. RVVC is a debilitating, long-term condition that can apeutic regimen for the treatment of recurrent vul- severely affect the quality of life of women. Most VVC is Prepublication history for vovaginal candidiasis. ► diagnosed and treated empirically and women frequently this paper is available online. ► There may be a limitation of outcome from treat- To view these files, please visit self-treat with over-the-counter medications that could ment variation, routes of administration, different the journal online (http:// dx. doi. contribute to an increase in the antifungal resistance. The doses and quality of the randomised trials used in org/ 10.
    [Show full text]