May/June 2002 May/June 2002

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

May/June 2002 May/June 2002 arch/April 2002 May/June 2002 No.3/2002 May/June 2002 No.3/2002 The Native Title Newsletter is published on a bi-monthly basis. The newsletter includes a Contents summary of native title as reported in the News from the Native Title press. Although the summary canvasses me- Research Research Unit Unit 2 dia from around Australia, it is not intended to be an exhaustive review of de- Features velopments. NativeAn update Title onBusiness the British -Travelling Columbia Art The Native Title Newsletter also includes Treaty Process by Mark McMillan 3 Exhibition 5 contributions from people involved in native title research and processes. Views ex- YortaMaMu Yorta Canopy – CourtWalk Report 7 pressed in the contributions are those of the by Lisa Strelein 7 Ngarla Pilbara Leadership Training authors and do not necessarily reflect the CourseNative title in the news 119 views of the Australian Institute of Aborigi- nal and Torres Strait Islander Studies. NativeApplications title in the news 10 13 Notifications 14 Applications 15 Recent publications 14 NativeNotifications Title Research Unit publications 16 STOP PRESS Recent Publications 16 The Native Title Conference 2002: Outcomes and Possibilities Geraldton 3 -5 September Native Title Research Unit publications 17 Registrations close 16 August The Newsletter is now available in ELECTRONIC format. This will provide a FASTER service for you, and will make possible much greater distribution. If you would like to SUBSCRIBE to the Native Title Newsletter electronically, please send us an email on [email protected], and you will be helping us pro- vide a better service. Electronic subscription will replace the postal service, please include your postal address so we can cross check our records. Promoting knowledge and understanding of Australian Indigenous cultures, past and present NEWS FROM THE NATIVE TITLE RESEARCH UNIT International speakers confirmed For more information see the Provisional We are delighted to announce that we have Program or contact Patrick McConvell on two international guests who will give pa- <[email protected]>. pers at The Native Title Conference 2002 in Geraldton in September. Treaty website Mr Jerald Gomez, senior counsel repre- senting the Orang Asli in the recent Bukit A website outlining the history of the Treaty Tampoi decision in Malaysia, will be giving a campaign was launched on July 3 2002 at Plenary address. Mr Gomez represented the the AIATSIS. The treaty website details the Orang Asli in their claims for land rights account of the struggle by Indigenous Aus- and compensation. The decision in favour tralians for their rights to be recognised in of the Orang Asli is seen as a landmark for the form of a treaty. The website will be a the recognition of Indigenous peoples' land significant contribution to the contemporary rights in Malaysia. Treaty debate and the future relationship between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Hugh Braker QC is our second international Australians. speaker. Mr Braker is a member of the Tse- shaht First Nation of the Nuu-Chah-Nulth The website focuses on six areas: the Na- Tribal Council in Canada. He has worked tional Aboriginal Conference Proposal for a extensively on Indigenous issues in British Treaty of Commitment or Makarrata, the Columbia. Aboriginal Treaty Committee, the Aborigi- nal Sovereign Treaty '88 Campaign, the 1981 Other Plenary speakers include Geoff Clark, Senate Standing Committee report Two Dr Mick Dodson, Justice Robert French, Hundred Years Later, the Burunga Statement, Prof Marcia Langton, Graeme Neate, Noel Community Action for Rights, the AIATSIS Pearson, Daryl Williams, AM QC MP and Seminar Series on Treaty and links to other Hal Wootten AC QC. current debates. For a copy of the brochure and registration The merger of this important history, as form see the web page at - stored in the Institute's collections, and new http://www.aiatsis.gov.au/rsrch/ntru/ntru_ media technologies has been made possible conferences.htm through an ATSIC funded digitisation pro- or telephone 02 6246 1161, or email gram grant. The website marks the begin- [email protected] ning of a series of projects which will enable quick comprehensive access for those who wish to learn from history for the benefit of Workshop on Genealogies the future. AIATSIS is hosting a workshop on the The website is located at preparation and use of genealogies, espe- www.aiatsis.gov.au/treaty.htm cially in applied social science and Australian Indigenous studies. The workshop is being run by Patrick McConvell (Research Fellow) Two new Issues Papers and Grace Koch (Native Title Research Unit). The unit has published two new Issues Pa- pers. The May Issues Paper number 15, 'Preserving culture in Federal Court pro- ceedings: Gender restrictions and anthro- Native Title Newsletter No. 3/2002 2 pological experts' is by Greg McIntyre and of music with land. The book, Dyirbal Song Geoffrey Bagshaw. The paper considers Poetry: the oral literature of an Australian rainfor- how gender restricted evidence in native title est people, which she co-authored with claims is often an integral feature required to R.M.W. Dixon, won the 1996/1997 Stanner establish and substantiate connections to Prize jointly with the Bringing Them Home country. The authors' argue that the Federal Report. She has also done work in oral his- Court has to consider the public interest in tory and was compiler of the book, Kaytetye respecting the cultural concern of native title Country: an Aboriginal History of the Barrow claimants. The paper discusses the Federal Creek area. Grace has lectured on aspects of Court's approach to these issues in two re- Aboriginal music and society both nationally cent cases, Yarmirr and Ward. and internationally, presenting courses and seminars in Rome, Paris, Vienna, the U.S.A. The June Issues Paper, number 16, is by Sir and Australia. Anthony Mason, AC KBE and is titled 'The international concept of equality of interest Grace has been a contract researcher with in the sea as it affects the conservation of the Central Land Council for three land the environment and Indigenous interests.' claims and the Davenport-Murchison and This paper explores how the claim for col- Hatches Creek Township Native Title lective international exploitation of marine Claim. Her work has concentrated on gene- and submarine resources has been associ- alogies, women’s ritual and songs. ated in more recent times with the concept of the 'common heritage of mankind.' Ma- Since 1980 Grace has been active in the In- son argues that if such a concept is to be ternational Association of Sound and used, it would need to be adapted to benefit Audiovisual Archives (IASA), serving as Indigenous people. chair of two committees and Editor of the Association and, presently, as interim Sec- retary of the new Research Archives Com- New staff member mittee, which will have a strong focus on the protection of Indigenous intellectual We will miss Angela Terrill, Native Title Re- property rights as related to audiovisual search and Access Officer, who left at the materials, which is one of her main areas of end of June to take up a grant with the Max interest. In 1999, Grace, along with two In- Planck Institute on Endangered Languages. digenous representatives from Australia, was She has moved to Nijmegen, in the Nether- an invited participant to the Unesco semi- lands, to work with a team on this exciting nar, 'A Global Assessment of the 1989 Rec- project, which is funded for three years. ommendation on the Safeguarding of Traditional Culture and Folklore…' That Grace Koch is the new Research and Access same year, she was funded by the Ford Officer. She has worked AIATSIS since Foundation to present issues of protection 1975 in the Audiovisual Archives, and has of Indigenous intellectual property at a had many positions, including Sound Archi- workshop on research archives held in vist (Oral History and Music), Manager Manesar, India. (Audiovisual Collections) and most recently, in the Audiovisual Access Unit. She has Grace looks forward to helping clients, ex- been a Member of AIATSIS since 1982. tending networks and increasing her knowl- edge of native title issues. Grace’s academic background is in musicol- ogy, and she has published analyses of Aus- tralian Indigenous music jointly with Library news linguists such as Luise Hercus, Paul Black and R.M.W. Dixon as well as a number of The Library is a vital part of the Institute encyclopaedia entries on the music of Cen- with a diverse range of material held in its tral Australia, Cape York and the connection collections. Native Title Newsletter No. 3/2002 3 Services protected by an electronic security system, The Library is open to the general public for and do not circulate outside the Library. A study and reference. Contact the Library on conservator is on staff to undertake work on 02 6246 1182 or email li- collections. [email protected]. A specialist informa- tion service is available for those researching Recently the Library added over 600 manu- family history. The Family History Unit can script records to the Register of Australian be contacted on [email protected]. A Archives and Manuscripts web site hosted freecall service is available for Indigenous by the National Library of Australia. clients. The number is 1800 730 129. RAAM provides researchers with a conven- ient, centralised register of locations for The AIATSIS Library contains one of the primary research material. It can be ac- most comprehensive collections of print cessed at http://www.nla.gov.au/raam/ materials on Australian Indigenous studies in the world. You can search the catalogue Library staff welcome your enquiries and on line at http://mura.aiatsis.gov.au.
Recommended publications
  • The Gunditjmara Land Justice Story Jessica K Weir
    The legal outcomes the Gunditjmara achieved in the 1980s are often overlooked in the history of land rights and native title in Australia. The High Court Onus v Alcoa case and the subsequent settlement negotiated with the State of Victoria, sit alongside other well known bench marks in our land rights history, including the Gurindji strike (also known as the Wave Hill Walk-Off) and land claim that led to the development of land rights legislation in the Northern Territory. This publication links the experiences in the 1980s with the Gunditjmara’s present day recognition of native title, and considers the possibilities and limitations of native title within the broader context of land justice. The Gunditjmara Land Justice Story JESSICA K WEIR Euphemia Day, Johnny Lovett and Amy Williams filming at Cape Jessica Weir together at the native title Bridgewater consent determination Amy Williams is an aspiring young Jessica Weir is a human geographer Indigenous film maker and the focused on ecological and social communications officer for the issues in Australia, particularly water, NTRU. Amy has recently graduated country and ecological life. Jessica with her Advanced Diploma of completed this project as part of her Media Production, and is developing Research Fellowship in the Native Title and maintaining communication Research Unit (NTRU) at the Australian strategies for the NTRU. Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies. The Gunditjmara Land Justice Story JESSICA K WEIR First published in 2009 by the Native Title Research Unit, the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies GPO Box 553 Canberra ACT 2601 Tel: (61 2) 6246 1111 Fax: (61 2) 6249 7714 Email: [email protected] Web: www.aiatsis.gov.au/ Written by Jessica K Weir Copyright © Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Owners and Sea Country in the Southern Great Barrier Reef – Which Way Forward?
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ResearchOnline at James Cook University Final Report Traditional Owners and Sea Country in the Southern Great Barrier Reef – Which Way Forward? Allan Dale, Melissa George, Rosemary Hill and Duane Fraser Traditional Owners and Sea Country in the Southern Great Barrier Reef – Which Way Forward? Allan Dale1, Melissa George2, Rosemary Hill3 and Duane Fraser 1The Cairns Institute, James Cook University, Cairns 2NAILSMA, Darwin 3CSIRO, Cairns Supported by the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Programme Project 3.9: Indigenous capacity building and increased participation in management of Queensland sea country © CSIRO, 2016 Creative Commons Attribution Traditional Owners and Sea Country in the Southern Great Barrier Reef – Which Way Forward? is licensed by CSIRO for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Australia licence. For licence conditions see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry: 978-1-925088-91-5 This report should be cited as: Dale, A., George, M., Hill, R. and Fraser, D. (2016) Traditional Owners and Sea Country in the Southern Great Barrier Reef – Which Way Forward?. Report to the National Environmental Science Programme. Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited, Cairns (50pp.). Published by the Reef and Rainforest Research Centre on behalf of the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Programme (NESP) Tropical Water Quality (TWQ) Hub. The Tropical Water Quality Hub is part of the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Programme and is administered by the Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited (RRRC).
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Indigenous Co-Management and Biodiversity in the Wet Tropics
    Technical Report TROPICAL ECOSYSTEMS hub Framework and Institutional Analysis: Indigenous co-management and biodiversity protection in the Wet Tropics Kirsten Maclean, Rosemary Hill, Petina L. Pert, Ellie Bock, Paul Barrett, Robyn Bellafquih, Michael Friday, Vince Mundraby, Lisa Sarago, Joann Schmider, Leah Talbot Framework analysis: Towards indigenous co-management and biodiversity in the Wet Tropics Kirsten Maclean, Rosemary Hill, Petina L. Pert, Ellie Bock, Paul Barrett, Robyn Bellafquih, Michael Friday, Vince Mundraby, Lisa Sarago, Joann Schmider and Leah Talbot Supported by the Australian Government’s National Environmental Research Program © CSIRO National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry: 978-1-921359-74-3 This report should be cited as: Maclean, K., Hill, R., Pert, P.L., Bock, E., Barrett, P., Bellafquih, R., Friday, M., Mundraby, V., Sarago, L., Schmider, S., and L. Talbot (2012), Framework analysis: towards Indigenous co-management and biodiversity in the Wet Tropics. Report to the National Environmental Research Program. Published online by the Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited, Cairns (124pp.). Published by the Reef and Rainforest Research Centre on behalf of the Australian Government’s National Environmental Research Program (NERP) Tropical Ecosystems (TE) Hub. The Tropical Ecosystems Hub is part of the Australian Government’s Commonwealth National Environmental Research Program. The NERP TE Hub is administered in North Queensland by the Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited (RRRC). The NERP Tropical Ecosystem Hub addresses issues of concern for the management, conservation and sustainable use of the World Heritage listed Great Barrier Reef (GBR) and its catchments, tropical rainforests including the Wet Tropics World Heritage Area (WTWHA), and the terrestrial and marine assets underpinning resilient communities in the Torres Strait, through the generation and transfer of world-class research and shared knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Design Issuesceduna Aboriginal Children and Family
    INDIGENOUS DESIGN ISSUES: CEDUNA ABORIGINAL CHILDREN AND FAMILY CENTRE ___________________________________________________________________________________ 1 INDIGENOUS DESIGN ISSUES: CEDUNA ABORIGINAL CHILDREN AND FAMILY CENTRE ___________________________________________________________________________________ 2 INDIGENOUS DESIGN ISSUES: CEDUNA ABORIGINAL CHILDREN AND FAMILY CENTRE ___________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .................................................................................................................................... 5 ACKNOWELDGEMENTS............................................................................................................ 5 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 5 PART 1: PRECEDENTS AND “BEST PRACTICE„ DESIGN ....................................................10 The Design of Early Learning, Child-care and Children and Family Centres for Aboriginal People ..................................................................................................................................10 Conceptions of Quality ........................................................................................................ 10 Precedents: Pre-Schools, Kindergartens, Child and Family Centres ..................................12 Kulai Aboriginal Preschool .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Awakening Languages: Theory and Practice in the Revitalisation Of
    RE-AWAKENING LANGUAGES Theory and practice in the revitalisation of Australia’s Indigenous languages Edited by John Hobson, Kevin Lowe, Susan Poetsch and Michael Walsh Copyright Published 2010 by Sydney University Press SYDNEY UNIVERSITY PRESS University of Sydney Library sydney.edu.au/sup © John Hobson, Kevin Lowe, Susan Poetsch & Michael Walsh 2010 © Individual contributors 2010 © Sydney University Press 2010 Reproduction and Communication for other purposes Except as permitted under the Act, no part of this edition may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or communicated in any form or by any means without prior written permission. All requests for reproduction or communication should be made to Sydney University Press at the address below: Sydney University Press Fisher Library F03 University of Sydney NSW 2006 AUSTRALIA Email: [email protected] Readers are advised that protocols can exist in Indigenous Australian communities against speaking names and displaying images of the deceased. Please check with local Indigenous Elders before using this publication in their communities. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Re-awakening languages: theory and practice in the revitalisation of Australia’s Indigenous languages / edited by John Hobson … [et al.] ISBN: 9781920899554 (pbk.) Notes: Includes bibliographical references and index. Subjects: Aboriginal Australians--Languages--Revival. Australian languages--Social aspects. Language obsolescence--Australia. Language revival--Australia. iv Copyright Language planning--Australia. Other Authors/Contributors: Hobson, John Robert, 1958- Lowe, Kevin Connolly, 1952- Poetsch, Susan Patricia, 1966- Walsh, Michael James, 1948- Dewey Number: 499.15 Cover image: ‘Wiradjuri Water Symbols 1’, drawing by Lynette Riley. Water symbols represent a foundation requirement for all to be sustainable in their environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf, 92.84 KB
    A I A T S I S AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER STUDIES Native Title Research Unit NATIVE TITLE NEWSLETTER May and June 2001 No. 3/2001 The Native Title Newsletter is published on a bi-monthly basis. The newsletter includes a summary of native title as reported in the press. Although the summary canvasses papers from around Australia, it is not intended to be an exhaustive review of developments. The Native Title Newsletter also includes contributions from people involved in native title research and processes. Views expressed in the contributions are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies. Contents List of abbreviations........................................................................2 News from the Native Title Research Unit...............................2 Native title in the news..................................................................3 Applications......................................................................................14 Notifications....................................................................................15 Recent publications........................................................................16 Native Title Research Unit publications...................................17 Upcoming conferences NTRBs Legal Conference................................................................2 If you would like to subscribe to the Newsletter electronically, send us an e-mail on
    [Show full text]
  • Tropical Water Quality Hub Indigenous Engagement and Participation Strategy Version 1 – FINAL
    Tropical Water Quality Hub Indigenous Engagement and Participation Strategy Version 1 – FINAL NESP Tropical Water Quality Hub CONTENTS ACRONYMS ......................................................................................................................... II ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................... II INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 3 OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................................ 4 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE OBJECTIVES .......................................................................... 5 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ............................................................................................ 9 IDENTIFIED COMMUNICATION CHANNELS .....................................................................10 FURTHER INFORMATION ..................................................................................................10 APPENDIX A: INDIGENOUS ORGANISATIONS .................................................................11 APPENDIX B: GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH IN THE TORRES STRAIT ..........................14 VERSION CONTROL REVISION HISTORY Comment (review/amendment Version Date Reviewed by (Name, Position) type) Julie Carmody, Senior Research Complete draft document 0.1 23/04/15 Manager, RRRC 0.2 28/04/15 Melissa George, CEO, NAILSMA Review – no changes 0.3 30/04/15
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from Chile for Allocating Indigenous Water Rights in Australia
    1130 UNSW Law Journal Volume 40(3) 9 BEYOND RECOGNITION: LESSONS FROM CHILE FOR ALLOCATING INDIGENOUS WATER RIGHTS IN AUSTRALIA ELIZABETH MACPHERSON I INTRODUCTION Australian water law frameworks, which authorise water use, have historically excluded indigenous people. Indigenous land now exceeds 30 per cent of the total land in Australia.1 Yet indigenous water use rights are estimated at less than 0.01 per cent of total Australian water allocations.2 In the limited situations where water law frameworks have engaged with indigenous interests, they typically conceive of such interests as falling outside of the consumptive pool’3 of water applicable to commercial uses associated with activities on land such as irrigation, agriculture, industry or tourism.4 The idea that states must recognise’ indigenous groups, and their ongoing rights to land and resources, has become the central claim of the international indigenous rights movement. 5 Claims for recognition of indigenous land and resource rights are the logical outcome of demands for indigenous rights based on ideas of reparative’ justice.6 The colonisers failed to recognise indigenous rights to land and resources at the acquisition of sovereignty, the argument goes, and the remedy is to recognise those rights now. The dominant legal mechanism BCA, LLB (Hons) (VUW), PhD (Melbourne), Lecturer, School of Law, University of Canterbury. This research was carried out while the author was undertaking a PhD at the University of Melbourne. All translations have been made by the author, with italics used for Spanish language terms. 1 Jon Altman and Francis Markham, Values Mapping Indigenous Lands: An Exploration of Development Possibilities’ (Paper presented at Shaping the Future: National Native Title Conference, Alice Springs Convention Centre, 35 June 2013) 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Limited Review of the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Land Rights Act 1981, I Am Pleased to Present the Following Final Report and Recommendations
    Limited review of the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Land Rights Act 1981 Final Report The Hon Ian Hunter MLC Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation Parliament House ADELAIDE SA 5000 Dear Minister On behalf of the Review Panel appointed to assist in a limited review of the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Land Rights Act 1981, I am pleased to present the following Final Report and recommendations. This Final Report follows the Interim Report of 21 November 2013. It takes into account further consultations as recommended in the Interim Report and the discussions and outcome of the Special General Meeting convened by the Executive Board of Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara to discuss and decide on the recommendations made by the Panel in the Interim Report. As with the Interim Report, this Final Report has been prepared in accordance with the Terms of Reference provided and following consultation and discussion across the APY Lands as described. The recommendations in this Final Report are largely the same as those set out in the Interim Report, with small but important modifications to four of the recommendations to better accord with what Anangu have told the Panel subsequent to the Interim Report. The Panel underscores that the recommendations in this Final Report have not been either confirmed or rejected by all Anangu for reasons which are indicated in this Report. Further processes are recommended to enable Anangu to reach a consensus about the recommendations. Yours sincerely Hon. Dr. Robyn Layton AO QC Panel Chair April 2014 P a g e | 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... 7 Executive Summary .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tjayiwara Unmuru Celebrate Native Title Determination
    Aboriginal Way Issue 54, October 2013 A publication of South Australian Native Title Services Tjayiwara Unmuru celebrate native title determination Tjayiwara Unmuru Federal Court Hearing participants in SA’s far north. De Rose Hill achieves Australia’s first native title compensation determination Australia’s first native title The name of De Rose Hill will go down Under the Native Title Act, native title and this meant open communication compensation consent in Australian legal history for a number holders may be entitled to compensation between parties and of course determination was granted to of reasons. on just terms where an invalid act impacts overcoming the language barriers and on native title rights and interests. we thank the State for its cooperation the De Rose Hill native title “First, because you brought one of the for what was at times a challenging holders in South Australia’s early claims for recognition of your native Karina Lester, De Rose Hill Ilpalka process,” said Ms Lester. far north earlier this month. title rights over this country, and because Aboriginal Corporation chairperson you had the first hearing of such a claim said this is also a significant achievement Native title holder Peter De Rose said the The hearing of the Federal Court was in South Australia.” for the State, who played a key role in compensation determination was a better held at an important rock hole, Ilpalka, this outcome and have worked closely experience compared to the group’s fight on De Rose Hill Station. Now, again, you are leading the charge. with De Rose Hill Ilpalka Aboriginal for native title recognition which lasted This is the first time an award of Corporation through the entire process.
    [Show full text]
  • Languages and Dialects of the Goldfields Region
    Languages and Dialects of the Goldfields Region The Goldfields region of Western Australia is home to around 7,200 Aboriginal people who represent 12% of the region’s population.1 An estimated 2,900 people speak an Aboriginal language as a first language.2 Many of the remaining Aboriginal population speak an Aboriginal language as a second or subsequent language, are a partial speaker, recaller and/or speak an Aboriginal dialect of English or speak Standard Australian English. Identifying the languages and their dialects of the northern, western and southern districts of the region has proven to be difficult as there is meager historical linguistic material prior to 2011. Multiple forms of names are recorded in historical material and the relationships between the names needed to be investigated. However, Ngaanyatjarra and dialects, and Yankunytjatjarra as well as Walpiri and Pintupi from the Northern Territory have been well documented. Speakers of each of these languages are found in the Goldfields region. The southern and western Goldfields regions were heavily impacted during European settlement due to a number of mineral booms, in particular during initial gold rushes between 1890 and 1910. The region experienced an influx of around 20,000 people in a 2-year period during the first gold rushes at Coolgardie and Kalgoorlie. This boom decimated a number of Aboriginal populations through the spread of disease and starvation, competition for sparse water and food, and through massacres. Most Aboriginal people who survived the first wave of European settlement were relocated to the nine missions established in the region or were sent to other missions outside the area such as Mogumber Mission near Perth.
    [Show full text]
  • Parks Victoria Annual Report 2002-03
    2002/03 Annual Report Acknowledgement of Country and Indigenous Traditional Owners Parks Victoria respectfully acknowledges the original custodians of what is now known as Victoria; their rich culture, deep affinity with the land and spiritual connection to it. Parks Victoria is committed to establishing strong relationships and partnerships with the descendants of the original custodians to facilitate their active involvement in the future management of protected areas in Victoria. Vision An outstanding park and waterway system, protected and enhanced, for people, forever. Purpose We exist to: - conserve, protect and enhance environmental and cultural assets -responsibly meet the needs of our customers for quality information, services and experiences -provide excellence and innovation in park management - contribute to the social and economic well-being of Victorians. ISSN 1448 – 9090 Also published on www.parkweb.vic.gov.au Copyright © Parks Victoria 2003, this publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. General Disclaimer This document may be of assistance to you, but Parks Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the information it contains is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this document. Photographs Photographs from the Parks Victoria and Department of Sustainability and Environment collection except where noted. Cover: Leather Kelp by William Boyle, Alfred Nicholas Gardens, Lookout at You Yangs Regional Park. Inside cover: Ironbark woodland at St Arnaud Range National Park by Peter Kinchington.
    [Show full text]