DOCSLIB.ORG

Towards Indigenous Co-Management and Biodiversity in the Wet Tropics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Towards Indigenous Co-Management and Biodiversity in the Wet Tropics Technical Report TROPICAL ECOSYSTEMS hub Framework and Institutional Analysis: Indigenous co-management and biodiversity protection in the Wet Tropics Kirsten Maclean, Rosemary Hill, Petina L. Pert, Ellie Bock, Paul Barrett, Robyn Bellafquih, Michael Friday, Vince Mundraby, Lisa Sarago, Joann Schmider, Leah Talbot Framework analysis: Towards indigenous co-management and biodiversity in the Wet Tropics Kirsten Maclean, Rosemary Hill, Petina L. Pert, Ellie Bock, Paul Barrett, Robyn Bellafquih, Michael Friday, Vince Mundraby, Lisa Sarago, Joann Schmider and Leah Talbot Supported by the Australian Government’s National Environmental Research Program © CSIRO National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry: 978-1-921359-74-3 This report should be cited as: Maclean, K., Hill, R., Pert, P.L., Bock, E., Barrett, P., Bellafquih, R., Friday, M., Mundraby, V., Sarago, L., Schmider, S., and L. Talbot (2012), Framework analysis: towards Indigenous co-management and biodiversity in the Wet Tropics. Report to the National Environmental Research Program. Published online by the Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited, Cairns (124pp.). Published by the Reef and Rainforest Research Centre on behalf of the Australian Government’s National Environmental Research Program (NERP) Tropical Ecosystems (TE) Hub. The Tropical Ecosystems Hub is part of the Australian Government’s Commonwealth National Environmental Research Program. The NERP TE Hub is administered in North Queensland by the Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited (RRRC). The NERP Tropical Ecosystem Hub addresses issues of concern for the management, conservation and sustainable use of the World Heritage listed Great Barrier Reef (GBR) and its catchments, tropical rainforests including the Wet Tropics World Heritage Area (WTWHA), and the terrestrial and marine assets underpinning resilient communities in the Torres Strait, through the generation and transfer of world-class research and shared knowledge. This publication is copyright. The Copyright Act 1968 permits fair dealing for study, research, information or educational purposes subject to inclusion of a sufficient acknowledgement of the source. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the Australian Government, the Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, or any of the project partners and supporters whose valuable contributions are acknowledged on page vi. While reasonable effort has been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. Cover photographs: J. Carmody (main); R. Hill, K. Maclean, Jabalbina Yalanji Aboriginal Corporation. Reproduced with the permission of the Traditional Owners. This report is available for download from the NERP Tropical Ecosystems Hub website: http://www.nerptropical.edu.au/research December 2012 Contents Contents ........................................................................................................................................................... i List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................... iii List of Figures .................................................................................................................................................. iv Acronyms & Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................................ vi Author Contributions ...................................................................................................................................... vi Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................ vii Report Introduction and Co-research Design ................................................................................................... 1 Part I: Options for a Testable Framework with Thresholds ...................................................................... 4 Introduction to the framework analysis ........................................................................................................... 5 Why use a framework in co-research? ............................................................................................................. 5 How to develop a framework? ........................................................................................................................ 5 Our approach to development of the working framework .............................................................................. 8 What is in a framework? ................................................................................................................................. 9 Frameworks for Indigenous co-management and biodiversity protection: a brief review.................................. 9 Options for Frameworks for this Co-research ................................................................................................ 13 Option one: Linked indicators for ecosystem change ................................................................ 13 Option two: Empowering bio-cultural diversity ......................................................................... 14 Option three: Joint management of parks in the Northern Territory .......................................... 14 Option four: Miriuwung Gajerrong Cultural Planning Framework .............................................. 16 Option five: Typology of Indigenous engagement in environmental management ..................... 17 Option six: Modified Drivers-Pressures-State-Impact-Response .................................................. 18 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................................... 18 Part II: Institutional Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 20 Introduction to the Institutional Analysis ....................................................................................................... 21 INTERNATIONAL GOVERNANCE SCALE ......................................................................................................... 31 World Heritage Convention, 1972 ........................................................................................... 31 Convention on Biological Diversity, 1992 ................................................................................. 32 Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, 1992 ......................................................... 33 Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, 2007 ............................................................. 33 International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights ............................................... 35 International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination ..................... 36 NATIONAL GOVERNANCE SCALE .................................................................................................................. 37 Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (CWTH), 1999 ............................... 37 National Heritage List .............................................................................................................. 38 Native Title Act, 1993 (Cwlth) .................................................................................................. 39 Racial Discrimination Act 1975 ................................................................................................ 47 Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 ....................................................................... 47 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage Protection Act 1984 ............................................ 48 Australia’s Biological Conservation Strategy, 2010-2030 ........................................................... 48 QUEENSLAND STATE GOVERNANCE SCALE .................................................................................................. 49 Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act (QLD), 2003 ........................................................................... 49 Nature Conservation Act 1992 (QLD) ....................................................................................... 50 Sustainable Planning Act 2009 ................................................................................................ 53 Framework Analysis: Towards Indigenous Co-management and Biodiversity Protection in the Wet Tropics │ i Vegetation Management Act, 1999 ......................................................................................... 53 Wild Rivers Act 2005 ............................................................................................................... 54 Cape York Cultural Heritage Act 2007 ....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Traditional Owners and Sea Country in the Southern Great Barrier Reef – Which Way Forward?
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ResearchOnline at James Cook University Final Report Traditional Owners and Sea Country in the Southern Great Barrier Reef – Which Way Forward? Allan Dale, Melissa George, Rosemary Hill and Duane Fraser Traditional Owners and Sea Country in the Southern Great Barrier Reef – Which Way Forward? Allan Dale1, Melissa George2, Rosemary Hill3 and Duane Fraser 1The Cairns Institute, James Cook University, Cairns 2NAILSMA, Darwin 3CSIRO, Cairns Supported by the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Programme Project 3.9: Indigenous capacity building and increased participation in management of Queensland sea country © CSIRO, 2016 Creative Commons Attribution Traditional Owners and Sea Country in the Southern Great Barrier Reef – Which Way Forward? is licensed by CSIRO for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Australia licence. For licence conditions see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry: 978-1-925088-91-5 This report should be cited as: Dale, A., George, M., Hill, R. and Fraser, D. (2016) Traditional Owners and Sea Country in the Southern Great Barrier Reef – Which Way Forward?. Report to the National Environmental Science Programme. Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited, Cairns (50pp.). Published by the Reef and Rainforest Research Centre on behalf of the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Programme (NESP) Tropical Water Quality (TWQ) Hub. The Tropical Water Quality Hub is part of the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Programme and is administered by the Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited (RRRC).
    [Show full text]
  • Contents What’S New
    September / October, No. 5/2011 CONTENTS WHAT’S NEW Two Suggestions About How To Make Cultural Heritage Win a free registration to the Materials Available .................................................................... 2 2012 Native Title Conference! Workshop Series: Thresholds for Traditional Owner Settlements in Victoria .............................................................. 4 Just take 5 minutes to complete our publications survey and you will go into the Foundations of the Kimberley Aboriginal Caring for Country Plan — Bungarun and the Kimberley Aboriginal Reference draw to win a free registration to the 2012 Group .......................................................................................... 5 Native Title Conference. The winner will be announced in January, 2012. ‘Anthropologies of Change: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges’ Workshop .............................................................. 8 CLICK HERE TO COMPLETE THE From Mississippi to Broome – Creating Transformative SURVEY Indigenous Economic Opportunity ........................................ 10 What’s New ............................................................................... 11 If you have any questions or concerns, please Native Title Publications ......................................................... 19 contact Matt O’Rourke at the Native Title Research Unit on (02) 6246 1158 or Native Title in the News ........................................................... 19 [email protected] Indigenous Land Use Agreements (ILUAs)
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Historical Society of Queensland Journal The
    ROYAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF QUEENSLAND JOURNAL Volume XV, No.l February 1993 THE WORLD OF THE BAMA Aboriginal-European Relations in the Cairns Rainforest Region to 1876 by Timothy Bottoms (All Rights Reserved) Presented to the Society as an Audio-Visual Program 10th August 1991 The world of the Djabugay-Yidiny [Jabuguy-Yidin] speaking people occupied what is now called the Cairns rainforest region. Their term for themselves is BAMA [Bum-ah] — meaning 'people'. To the south are Dyirbal [Jirrbal] speaking tribes who are linguistically different from their northern Yidiny-speakers, as German is to French. There appears to have been quite a deal of animosity' between these linguistically different neighbours. To the north are the Kuku-Yalanji [Kookoo Ya-lan-ji] who seem to have a great deal more in common with their southern Djabugay- speaking neighbours. In the northern half of the Cairns rainforest region are the Djabugay-speaking tribal groupings; the Djabuganydji [Jabu-ganji], the Nyagali [Na-kali], the Guluy [Koo-lie], the Buluwanydji [Bull-a- wan-ji], and on the coastal strip, the Yirrganydji [Yirr-gan-ji].^ The clans within each tribal grouping spoke dialects of Djabugay — so that, although there were differences, they were mutually understandable.^ The southern half of the Cairns rainforest region is home to the linguistically related Yidiny-speaking people. Fifty- three percent of the Yidiny lexicon is derived from Djabugay." However in the same fashion as the Djabugay-speakers — each clan, and there are many in each tribe,^ considered itself an entity in its own right, despite the linguistic affinities. The tribes who spoke Yidiny-related dialects were the Gungganydji [Kung-gan-ji], the Yidinydji [Yidin-ji], the Madjanydji [Mad-jan-ji], and Wanjuru.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf, 92.84 KB
    A I A T S I S AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER STUDIES Native Title Research Unit NATIVE TITLE NEWSLETTER May and June 2001 No. 3/2001 The Native Title Newsletter is published on a bi-monthly basis. The newsletter includes a summary of native title as reported in the press. Although the summary canvasses papers from around Australia, it is not intended to be an exhaustive review of developments. The Native Title Newsletter also includes contributions from people involved in native title research and processes. Views expressed in the contributions are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies. Contents List of abbreviations........................................................................2 News from the Native Title Research Unit...............................2 Native title in the news..................................................................3 Applications......................................................................................14 Notifications....................................................................................15 Recent publications........................................................................16 Native Title Research Unit publications...................................17 Upcoming conferences NTRBs Legal Conference................................................................2 If you would like to subscribe to the Newsletter electronically, send us an e-mail on
    [Show full text]
  • The Cyclone As Trope of Apocalypse and Place in Queensland Literature
    ResearchOnline@JCU This file is part of the following work: Spicer, Chrystopher J. (2018) The cyclone written into our place: the cyclone as trope of apocalypse and place in Queensland literature. PhD Thesis, James Cook University. Access to this file is available from: https://doi.org/10.25903/7pjw%2D9y76 Copyright © 2018 Chrystopher J. Spicer. The author has certified to JCU that they have made a reasonable effort to gain permission and acknowledge the owners of any third party copyright material included in this document. If you believe that this is not the case, please email [email protected] The Cyclone Written Into Our Place The cyclone as trope of apocalypse and place in Queensland literature Thesis submitted by Chrystopher J Spicer M.A. July, 2018 For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy College of Arts, Society and Education James Cook University ii Acknowledgements of the Contribution of Others I would like to thank a number of people for their help and encouragement during this research project. Firstly, I would like to thank my wife Marcella whose constant belief that I could accomplish this project, while she was learning to live with her own personal trauma at the same time, encouraged me to persevere with this thesis project when the tide of my own faith would ebb. I could not have come this far without her faith in me and her determination to journey with me on this path. I would also like to thank my supervisors, Professors Stephen Torre and Richard Landsdown, for their valuable support, constructive criticism and suggestions during the course of our work together.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents What’S New
    July / August, No. 4/2011 CONTENTS WHAT’S NEW Quandamooka Native Title Determination ............................... 2 Win a free registration to the Joint Management Workshop at the 2011 National Native 2012 Native Title Conference! Title Conference: ‘What helps? What harms?’ ........................ 4 Just take 5 minutes to complete our An extract from Mabo in the Courts: Islander Tradition to publications survey and you will go into the Native Title: A Memoir ............................................................... 5 draw to win a free registration to the 2012 QLD Regional PBC Meeting ...................................................... 6 Native Title Conference. Those who have What’s New ................................................................................. 6 already completed the survey will be automatically included. Recent Cases ............................................................................. 6 Legislation and Policy ............................................................. 12 Complete the survey at: Native Title Publications ......................................................... 13 http://www.tfaforms.com/208207 Native Title in the News ........................................................... 14 If you have any questions or concerns, please Indigenous Land Use Agreements (ILUAs) ........................... 20 contact Matt O’Rourke at the Native Title Research Unit on (02) 6246 1158 or Determinations ......................................................................... 21 [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Tropical Water Quality Hub Indigenous Engagement and Participation Strategy Version 1 – FINAL
    Tropical Water Quality Hub Indigenous Engagement and Participation Strategy Version 1 – FINAL NESP Tropical Water Quality Hub CONTENTS ACRONYMS ......................................................................................................................... II ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................... II INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 3 OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................................ 4 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE OBJECTIVES .......................................................................... 5 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ............................................................................................ 9 IDENTIFIED COMMUNICATION CHANNELS .....................................................................10 FURTHER INFORMATION ..................................................................................................10 APPENDIX A: INDIGENOUS ORGANISATIONS .................................................................11 APPENDIX B: GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH IN THE TORRES STRAIT ..........................14 VERSION CONTROL REVISION HISTORY Comment (review/amendment Version Date Reviewed by (Name, Position) type) Julie Carmody, Senior Research Complete draft document 0.1 23/04/15 Manager, RRRC 0.2 28/04/15 Melissa George, CEO, NAILSMA Review – no changes 0.3 30/04/15
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from Chile for Allocating Indigenous Water Rights in Australia
    1130 UNSW Law Journal Volume 40(3) 9 BEYOND RECOGNITION: LESSONS FROM CHILE FOR ALLOCATING INDIGENOUS WATER RIGHTS IN AUSTRALIA ELIZABETH MACPHERSON I INTRODUCTION Australian water law frameworks, which authorise water use, have historically excluded indigenous people. Indigenous land now exceeds 30 per cent of the total land in Australia.1 Yet indigenous water use rights are estimated at less than 0.01 per cent of total Australian water allocations.2 In the limited situations where water law frameworks have engaged with indigenous interests, they typically conceive of such interests as falling outside of the consumptive pool’3 of water applicable to commercial uses associated with activities on land such as irrigation, agriculture, industry or tourism.4 The idea that states must recognise’ indigenous groups, and their ongoing rights to land and resources, has become the central claim of the international indigenous rights movement. 5 Claims for recognition of indigenous land and resource rights are the logical outcome of demands for indigenous rights based on ideas of reparative’ justice.6 The colonisers failed to recognise indigenous rights to land and resources at the acquisition of sovereignty, the argument goes, and the remedy is to recognise those rights now. The dominant legal mechanism BCA, LLB (Hons) (VUW), PhD (Melbourne), Lecturer, School of Law, University of Canterbury. This research was carried out while the author was undertaking a PhD at the University of Melbourne. All translations have been made by the author, with italics used for Spanish language terms. 1 Jon Altman and Francis Markham, Values Mapping Indigenous Lands: An Exploration of Development Possibilities’ (Paper presented at Shaping the Future: National Native Title Conference, Alice Springs Convention Centre, 35 June 2013) 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Queensland Region Topographic Vector Data Is © Commonwealth of Australia (Geoscience the Register of Native Title Claims (RNTC), If a Registered Application
    142°0'E 144°0'E 146°0'E 148°0'E 150°0'E Hopevale Claimant application and determination boundary data compiled from external boundaries with areas excluded or discrete boundaries of Currency is based on the information as held by the NNTT and may not NNTT based on data sourced from Department of Resources (Qld) © areas being claimed) as they have been recognised by the Federal reflect all decisions of the Federal Court. The State of Queensland for that portion where their data has been Court process. To determine whether any areas fall within the external boundary of an used. Where the boundary of an application has been amended in the Federal application or determination, a search of the Tribunal's registers and Court, the map shows this boundary rather than the boundary as per databases is required. Further information is available from the QUD673/2014 Northern Queensland Region Topographic vector data is © Commonwealth of Australia (Geoscience the Register of Native Title Claims (RNTC), if a registered application. Tribunals website at www.nntt.gov.au or by calling 1800 640 501 Cape York United Number 1 Claim Australia) 2006. The applications shown on the map include: © Commonwealth of Australia 2021 (QC2014/008) Non freehold land tenure sourced from Department of Resources (QLD) - registered applications (i.e. those that have complied with the The Registrar, the National Native Title Tribunal and its staff, members March 2021. registration test), and agents and the Commonwealth (collectively the Commonwealth) Native Title Claimant Applications and - new and/or amended applications where the registration test is being accept no liability and give no undertakings guarantees or warranties KOWANYAMA COO KTOW N (! (! As part of the transitional provisions of the amended Native Title Act in applied, concerning the accuracy, completeness or fitness for purpose of the Determination Areas 1998, all applications were taken to have been filed in the Federal - unregistered applications (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Aboriginal Rock Art and Dendroglyphs of Queensland's Wet Tropics
    ResearchOnline@JCU This file is part of the following reference: Buhrich, Alice (2017) Art and identity: Aboriginal rock art and dendroglyphs of Queensland's Wet Tropics. PhD thesis, James Cook University. Access to this file is available from: https://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/51812/ The author has certified to JCU that they have made a reasonable effort to gain permission and acknowledge the owner of any third party copyright material included in this document. If you believe that this is not the case, please contact [email protected] and quote https://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/51812/ Art and Identity: Aboriginal rock art and dendroglyphs of Queensland’s Wet Tropics Alice Buhrich BA (Hons) July 2017 Submitted as part of the research requirements for Doctor of Philosophy, College of Arts, Society and Education, James Cook University Acknowledgements First, I would like to thank the many Traditional Owners who have been my teachers, field companions and friends during this thesis journey. Alf Joyce, Steve Purcell, Willie Brim, Alwyn Lyall, Brad Grogan, Billie Brim, George Skeene, Brad Go Sam, Marita Budden, Frank Royee, Corey Boaden, Ben Purcell, Janine Gertz, Harry Gertz, Betty Cashmere, Shirley Lifu, Cedric Cashmere, Jeanette Singleton, Gavin Singleton, Gudju Gudju Fourmile and Ernie Grant, it has been a pleasure working with every one of you and I look forward to our future collaborations on rock art, carved trees and beyond. Thank you for sharing your knowledge and culture with me. This thesis would never have been completed without my team of fearless academic supervisors and mentors, most importantly Dr Shelley Greer.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Saltwater
    2013 Freshwater Saltwater YOU AND ME CONNECTING TO COUNTRY STRENGTHENING OUR ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER CULTURAL PRACTICES Freshwater Saltwater: Connecting to country to Connecting Saltwater: Freshwater Published by UMI Arts to support the Freshwater Saltwater: Connecting to country exhibition at UMI Arts, 14 August – 25 September 2013 UMI Arts 335 Sheridan Street North Cairns, Queensland 4870 Ph (07) 4041 6152 Fax (07) 4041 6542 Email: [email protected] www.umiarts.com.au Copyright 2013 UMI Arts Limited, Artists and Authors All rights reserved ISBN: 978-0-9922945-1-9 This publication is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of criticism, review or private research as allowed under the Copyright Act, no part of this publication or its images can be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted by any means without written permission. The spelling of Indigenous words and names varies. UMI Arts has used the spelling provided by the Artists. Exhibition Curator: Teho Ropeyarn Exhibition Team: Teho Ropeyarn, Jaivan Bowen, Janet Parfenovics and Danelle Nicol Catalogue design and production: Guy Hancock Artwork photography: Michael Marzik This project has been made possible by the Australian Government Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Office for the Arts (Indigenous Visual Arts Industry Support), Australian Government (Visual Arts and Craft Strategy), Arts Queensland and ARUP. Cover image: Agnes Mark, Burn Grass Title page image: Philomena Yeatman, Jurbal Mugaru Back page image: Marsat Newman,
    [Show full text]
  • A Thesis Submitted by Dale Wayne Kerwin for the Award of Doctor of Philosophy 2020
    SOUTHWARD MOVEMENT OF WATER – THE WATER WAYS A thesis submitted by Dale Wayne Kerwin For the award of Doctor of Philosophy 2020 Abstract This thesis explores the acculturation of the Australian landscape by the First Nations people of Australia who named it, mapped it and used tangible and intangible material property in designing their laws and lore to manage the environment. This is taught through song, dance, stories, and paintings. Through the tangible and intangible knowledge there is acknowledgement of the First Nations people’s knowledge of the water flows and rivers from Carpentaria to Goolwa in South Australia as a cultural continuum and passed onto younger generations by Elders. This knowledge is remembered as storyways, songlines and trade routes along the waterways; these are mapped as a narrative through illustrations on scarred trees, the body, engravings on rocks, or earth geographical markers such as hills and physical features, and other natural features of flora and fauna in the First Nations cultural memory. The thesis also engages in a dialogical discourse about the paradigm of 'ecological arrogance' in Australian law for water and environmental management policies, whereby Aqua Nullius, Environmental Nullius and Economic Nullius is written into Australian laws. It further outlines how the anthropocentric value of nature as a resource and the accompanying humanistic technology provide what modern humans believe is the tool for managing ecosystems. In response, today there is a coming together of the First Nations people and the new Australians in a shared histories perspective, to highlight and ensure the protection of natural values to land and waterways which this thesis also explores.
    [Show full text]