Shirley Chisholm: the Good Fight
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Honorable Elizabeth Holtzman Oral History Interview Final Edited
The Honorable Elizabeth Holtzman U.S. Representative of New York (1973–1981) Oral History Interview Final Edited Transcript March 10, 2016 Office of the Historian U.S. House of Representatives Washington, D.C. “I said, ‘The agenda of what we need to do is so huge, we can’t possibly accomplish everything anyway. So let’s just focus on areas that we agree on. And first of all, it will make us stronger if all agree, and all agree to work on them.’ And that’s how we started. And also, it was critical, I think, to get people’s participation, the participation of women. Because I think since it was really early, there had been no caucus, to the best of my knowledge, before that. Women had not worked together. We were concerned about being ridiculed. We were concerned about negative press. We were concerned about how this was going to affect us in our district. I think we—this was a very important step to make people feel politically comfortable in joining with people of different political views. So, I think it worked. From my point of view, it worked.” The Honorable Elizabeth Holtzman March 10, 2016 Table of Contents Interview Abstract i Interviewee Biography i Editing Practices ii Citation Information ii Interviewer Biographies iii Interview 1 Notes 48 Abstract Elizabeth (Liz) Holtzman pulled off a major upset when she defeated longtime Representative and Judiciary Committee Chairman, Emanuel Celler, to win a seat in the 93rd Congress (1973–1975). The youngest woman ever elected to Congress at the time (31)—a record that would stand for more than four decades—Holtzman’s grassroots campaign in her New York City district centered on her opposition to the Vietnam War. -
The Radical Feminist Manifesto As Generic Appropriation: Gender, Genre, and Second Wave Resistance
Southern Journal of Communication ISSN: 1041-794X (Print) 1930-3203 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rsjc20 The radical feminist manifesto as generic appropriation: Gender, genre, and second wave resistance Kimber Charles Pearce To cite this article: Kimber Charles Pearce (1999) The radical feminist manifesto as generic appropriation: Gender, genre, and second wave resistance, Southern Journal of Communication, 64:4, 307-315, DOI: 10.1080/10417949909373145 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949909373145 Published online: 01 Apr 2009. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 578 View related articles Citing articles: 4 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rsjc20 The Radical Feminist Manifesto as Generic Appropriation: Gender, Genre, And Second Wave Resistance Kimber Charles Pearce n June of 1968, self-styled feminist revolutionary Valerie Solanis discovered herself at the heart of a media spectacle after she shot pop artist Andy Warhol, whom she I accused of plagiarizing her ideas. While incarcerated for the attack, she penned the "S.C.U.M. Manifesto"—"The Society for Cutting Up Men." By doing so, Solanis appropriated the traditionally masculine manifesto genre, which had evolved from sov- ereign proclamations of the 1600s into a form of radical protest of the 1960s. Feminist appropriation of the manifesto genre can be traced as far back as the 1848 Seneca Falls Woman's Rights Convention, at which suffragists Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucretia Coffin Mott, Martha Coffin, and Mary Ann McClintock parodied the Declara- tion of Independence with their "Declaration of Sentiments" (Campbell, 1989). -
Library of Congress Magazine January/February 2018
INSIDE PLUS A Journey Be Mine, Valentine To Freedom Happy 200th, Mr. Douglass Find Your Roots Voices of Slavery At the Library LIBRARY OF CONGRESS MAGAZINE JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2018 Building Black History A New View of Tubman LOC.GOV LIBRARY OF CONGRESS MAGAZINE Library of Congress Magazine Vol. 7 No. 1: January/February 2018 Mission of the Library of Congress The Library’s central mission is to provide Congress, the federal government and the American people with a rich, diverse and enduring source of knowledge that can be relied upon to inform, inspire and engage them, and support their intellectual and creative endeavors. Library of Congress Magazine is issued bimonthly by the Office of Communications of the Library of Congress and distributed free of charge to publicly supported libraries and research institutions, donors, academic libraries, learned societies and allied organizations in the United States. Research institutions and educational organizations in other countries may arrange to receive Library of Congress Magazine on an exchange basis by applying in writing to the Library’s Director for Acquisitions and Bibliographic Access, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington DC 20540-4100. LCM is also available on the web at loc.gov/lcm/. All other correspondence should be addressed to the Office of Communications, Library of Congress, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington DC 20540-1610. [email protected] loc.gov/lcm ISSN 2169-0855 (print) ISSN 2169-0863 (online) Carla D. Hayden Librarian of Congress Gayle Osterberg Executive Editor Mark Hartsell Editor John H. Sayers Managing Editor Ashley Jones Designer Shawn Miller Photo Editor Contributors Bryonna Head Wendi A. -
The US Anti- Apartheid Movement and Civil Rights Memory
BRATYANSKI, JENNIFER A., Ph.D. Mainstreaming Movements: The U.S. Anti- Apartheid Movement and Civil Rights Memory (2012) Directed by Dr. Thomas F. Jackson. 190pp. By the time of Nelson Mandela’s release from prison, in 1990, television and film had brought South Africa’s history of racial injustice and human rights violations into living rooms and cinemas across the United States. New media formats such as satellite and cable television widened mobilization efforts for international opposition to apartheid. But at stake for the U.S. based anti-apartheid movement was avoiding the problems of media misrepresentation that previous transnational movements had experienced in previous decades. Movement participants and supporters needed to connect the liberation struggles in South Africa to the historical domestic struggles for racial justice. What resulted was the romanticizing of a domestic civil rights memory through the mediated images of the anti-apartheid struggle which appeared between 1968 and 1994. Ultimately, both the anti-apartheid and civil rights movements were sanitized of their radical roots, which threatened the ongoing struggles for black economic advancement in both countries. MAINSTREAMING MOVEMENTS: THE U.S. ANTI-APARTHEID MOVEMENT AND CIVIL RIGHTS MEMEORY by Jennifer A. Bratyanski A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate School at The University of North Carolina at Greensboro in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Greensboro 2012 Approved by Thomas F. Jackson Committee -
DOUG Mcadam CURRENT POSITION
DOUG McADAM CURRENT POSITION: The Ray Lyman Wilbur Professor of Sociology (with affiliations in American Studies, Comparative Studies in Race and Ethnicity, and the Interdisciplinary Program in Environmental Research) Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305 PRIOR POSITIONS: Fall 2001 – Summer 2005 Director, Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, CA Fall 1998 – Summer 2001 Professor, Department of Sociology, Stanford University Spring 1983 - Summer 1998 Assistant to Full Professor, Department of Sociology, University of Arizona Fall 1979 - Winter 1982 Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, George Mason University EDUCATION: 1973 Occidental College Los Angeles, California B.S., Sociology 1977 State University of New York at Stony Brook Stony Brook, New York M.A., Sociology 1979 State University of New York at Stony Brook Stony Brook, New York Ph.D., Sociology FELLOWSHIPS AND OTHER HONORS: Post Graduate Visiting Scholar, Russell Sage Foundation, 2013-14. DOUG McADAM Page 2 Granted 2013 “Award for Distinguished Scholar,” by University of Wisconsin, Whitewater, March 2013. Named the Ray Lyman Wilbur Professor of Sociology, 2013. Awarded the 2012 Joseph B. and Toby Gittler Prize, Brandeis University, November 2012 Invited to deliver the Gunnar Myrdal Lecture at Stockholm University, May 2012 Invited to deliver the 2010-11 “Williamson Lecture” at Lehigh University, October 2010. Named a Phi Beta Kappa Society Visiting Scholar for 2010-11. Named Visiting Scholar at the Russell Sage Foundation for 2010-11. (Forced to turn down the invitation) Co-director of a 2010 Social Science Research Council pre-dissertation workshop on “Contentious Politics.” Awarded the 2010 Jonathan M. Tisch College of Citizenship and Public Service Research Prize, given annually to a scholar for their contributions to the study of “civic engagement.” Awarded the John D. -
Women and the Presidency
Women and the Presidency By Cynthia Richie Terrell* I. Introduction As six women entered the field of Democratic presidential candidates in 2019, the political media rushed to declare 2020 a new “year of the woman.” In the Washington Post, one political commentator proclaimed that “2020 may be historic for women in more ways than one”1 given that four of these woman presidential candidates were already holding a U.S. Senate seat. A writer for Vox similarly hailed the “unprecedented range of solid women” seeking the nomination and urged Democrats to nominate one of them.2 Politico ran a piece definitively declaring that “2020 will be the year of the woman” and went on to suggest that the “Democratic primary landscape looks to be tilted to another woman presidential nominee.”3 The excited tone projected by the media carried an air of inevitability: after Hillary Clinton lost in 2016, despite receiving 2.8 million more popular votes than her opponent, ever more women were running for the presidency. There is a reason, however, why historical inevitably has not yet been realized. Although Americans have selected a president 58 times, a man has won every one of these contests. Before 2019, a major party’s presidential debates had never featured more than one woman. Progress toward gender balance in politics has moved at a glacial pace. In 1937, seventeen years after passage of the Nineteenth Amendment, Gallup conducted a poll in which Americans were asked whether they would support a woman for president “if she were qualified in every other respect?”4 * Cynthia Richie Terrell is the founder and executive director of RepresentWomen, an organization dedicated to advancing women’s representation and leadership in the United States. -
Extensions of Remarks 1635 H
January 28, 1975 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 1635 H. Res. 103. Resolution expressing the m.itted by the Secretary of the Interior, pur By Mr. CONTE: sense of the House that the U.S. Government suant to the provisions of the act of October H.R. 2279. A bill for the relief of Mrs. Louise should seek agreement with other members 19, 1973 (87 Stat. 466), providing for the G. Whalen; to the Committee on the Judi of the United Nations on prohibition of distribution of funds appropriated in satis ciary. weather modification activity as a weapon of faction of an award of the Indian Claims By Mr. HELSTOSKI: war; to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. Commission to the Cowlitz Tribe of Indians H.R. 2280. A bill for the relief of Mr. and By Mr. HENDERSON (for himself and in docket No. 218; to the Committee on In 1\:!rs. Luis (Maria) Echavarria; to the Com Mr. DER~SKI) : terior and Insular Affairs. mittee on the Judiciary. H. Res. 104. Resolution to provide funds By Mr. PEYSER (for himself, Mr. By Mr. McCLOSKEY: for the expenses of the investigation and WmTH, and Mr. OTTINGER): H.R. 2281. A bill for the relief of Kim Ung study authorized by House Rule XI; to the H. Res. 108. Resolution expressing the sense Nyu; to the Committee on the Judiciary. Committee on House Administration. of the House that the Secretary of Agriculture H.R. 2282. A bill for the relief of Lee-Daniel By Mrs. HOLT: should rescind the food stamp regulations Alexander; to the Committee on the Judici H. -
Shirley Chisholm Had Guts Marilyn L
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Journal of Women in Educational Leadership Educational Administration, Department of 1-2005 Shirley Chisholm Had Guts Marilyn L. Grady University of Nebraska-Linoln, [email protected] Barbara LaCost University of Nebraska–Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/jwel Part of the Educational Administration and Supervision Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Grady, Marilyn L. and LaCost, Barbara, "Shirley Chisholm Had Guts" (2005). Journal of Women in Educational Leadership. 138. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/jwel/138 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Educational Administration, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Women in Educational Leadership by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Shirley Chisholm Had Guts Marilyn L. Grady Barbara Y. LaCost We note the passing of Shirley Chisholm (1924-2005), a 1993 inductee to the National Women's Hall of Fame. Bom in New York, she was the oldest of four daughters. Her father was from British Guiana and her mother was from Barbados. In 1927, she was sent to Barbados to live with her maternal grandmother. She was educated in the British school system until she returned to New York in 1934. She attended Girls High School in Brooklyn, graduated cum laude from Brooklyn College in 1946, and received a masters degree in elementary education from Columbia University. She worked at Mt. Calvary Childcare Center in Harlem, was the director of the Hamilton Madison Child Care Center (1953-1959), and was an educational consultant for the Division of Day Care (1959-1964). -
March Is WOMEN’S HISTORY MONTH
March is WOMEN’S HISTORY MONTH New York State Senator ROXANNE J. PERSAUD About Women’s History Month Women’s History Month was first They have helped to shape laws, names we recognize, there are recognized nationally in 1981 when changed the course of history, made numerous others we may not, but Congress passed Pub. L. 97-28, which great strides in science, politics, they continue to make life better for authorized and requested the President sports, literature, art and many other everyone. to proclaim the week beginning March 7, areas. They have fought for the right 1982 as “Women’s History Week.” Every to vote, go to school, earn wages, One of the key events for the March, New York State joins the nation serve on juries and in the military, advancement of women’s issues was in celebrating Women’s History Month. fought discrimination and continue to the Women’s Suffrage Movement This time is used to acknowledge the effect change. which was born in New York State. The accomplishments and contributions of Movement held its first convention in There are countless women from women in the United States. Seneca Falls on July 19 and 20, 1848. New York State whose efforts are This important event became the key to Women have played an essential part in noteworthy. While there are some empowerment and change. New York and United States history. A few New York women of note... Susan B. Anthony (1820-1906) Susan B. Ruth Bader Ginsburg (1933- ) The second Anthony was a civil rights activist and suffrag- female justice to be confirmed to the ist who campaigned against slavery and for Supreme Court of the United States, Ruth women to be given the right to vote. -
The Equal Rights Amendment Revisited
Notre Dame Law Review Volume 94 | Issue 2 Article 10 1-2019 The qualE Rights Amendment Revisited Bridget L. Murphy Notre Dame Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Law and Gender Commons, and the Legislation Commons Recommended Citation 94 Notre Dame L. Rev. 937 (2019). This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Notre Dame Law Review at NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Law Review by an authorized editor of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. \\jciprod01\productn\N\NDL\94-2\NDL210.txt unknown Seq: 1 18-DEC-18 7:48 THE EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT REVISITED Bridget L. Murphy* [I]t’s humiliating. A new amendment we vote on declaring that I am equal under the law to a man. I am mortified to discover there’s reason to believe I wasn’t before. I am a citizen of this country. I am not a special subset in need of your protection. I do not have to have my rights handed down to me by a bunch of old, white men. The same [Amendment] Fourteen that protects you, protects me. And I went to law school just to make sure. —Ainsley Hayes, 20011 If I could choose an amendment to add to this constitution, it would be the Equal Rights Amendment . It means that women are people equal in stature before the law. And that’s a fundamental constitutional principle. I think we have achieved that through legislation. -
Download The
Women’s History Month Art Contest In the space provided, draw a picture of a New York woman you admire. March is Women’s History Month NAME: AGE: NAME OF WOMAN PICTURED: Tear off this sheet and send your art to Assemblyman Edward C. Braunstein at 213-33 39th Avenue, Suite 238, Bayside, NY 11361. The winningTear pieceoff this will sheet be cover and send art foryour next art year’sto Assemblymember brochure and will at beXXXX, seen XXXXby hundreds, NY XXXXX of students. The winningthroughout piece our will community! be cover art for next year’s brochure and will be seen by hundreds of students throughout our community! Assemblyman Edward C. Braunstein 213-33Assemblymember 39th Avenue, Suite 238 • Bayside, NY 11361 FirstName • 718-357-3588 • [email protected] LastName Shirley Chisholm drawn by: Calise, 8th Grade, Marie Curie M.S 158 XXXX • XXXX, NY XXXXX • XXX-XXX-XXXX • [email protected] 1. Suffrage 2. Clinton 4. Senator 5. Yale 5. Senator 4. Clinton 2. Suffrage 1. DOWN: ANSWERS CROSSWORD 1. Seneca Falls 3. Chisholm 4. Sotomayor 6. Walker 7. Tubman 8. Roosevelt 8. Tubman 7. Walker 6. Sotomayor 4. Chisholm 3. Falls Seneca 1. ACROSS: ANSWERS CROSSWORD Honor 8. Empowerment 7. Equality 6. Liberty 5. Ratify 4. Education 3. Falls Seneca 2. Suffrage 1. JUMBLE SOLUTIONS: SOLUTIONS: JUMBLE Updated 1/14 Why is it important to study women’s history? Jumble! Crossword The words below are all scrambled up. After (Answers on back panel) Women’s history isn’t just about women had to fight for their rights, including the first women’s rights convention was held reading about women in New York, can you or for women — it’s an important part of rights to go to school, to own property, to in Seneca Falls on July 19 and 20, 1848. -
How Sex Got Into Title VII: Persistent Opportunism As a Maker of Public Policy
Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality Volume 9 Issue 2 Article 1 June 1991 How Sex Got into Title VII: Persistent Opportunism as a Maker of Public Policy Jo Freeman Follow this and additional works at: https://lawandinequality.org/ Recommended Citation Jo Freeman, How Sex Got into Title VII: Persistent Opportunism as a Maker of Public Policy, 9(2) LAW & INEQ. 163 (1991). Available at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/lawineq/vol9/iss2/1 Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality is published by the University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. How "Sex" Got Into Title VII: Persistent Opportunism as a Maker of Public Policy Jo Freeman* The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a milestone of federal legis- lation. Like much major legislation, it had "incubated" for decades but was birthed in turmoil. On June 19, 1963, after the civil rights movement of the fifties and early sixties had focused national at- tention on racial injustice, President John F. Kennedy sent a draft omnibus civil rights bill to the Congress.' On February 8, 1964, while the bill was being debated on the House floor, Rep. Howard W. Smith of Virginia, Chairman of the Rules Committee and staunch opponent of all civil rights legislation, rose up and offered a one-word amendment to Title VII, which prohibited employment discrimination. He proposed to add "sex" to the bill in order "to prevent discrimination against another minority group, the women . "2 This stimulated several hours of humorous debate, later en- shrined as "Ladies Day in the House," 3 before the amendment was passed by a teller vote of 168 to 133.