DOCSLIB.ORG

The Preparatory Study for Pasig-Marikina River Channel Improvement Project (Phase Iii) in the Republic of the Philippines Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Preparatory Study for Pasig-Marikina River Channel Improvement Project (Phase Iii) in the Republic of the Philippines Final DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC JAPAN INTERNATIONAL WORKS AND HIGHWAYS COOPERATION AGENCY THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES THE PREPARATORY STUDY FOR PASIG-MARIKINA RIVER CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (PHASE III) IN THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES FINAL REPORT Volume 3 Supplement Documents October 2011 CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD GED CR 11-136 VOLUME III TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Implementation Program (DRAFT) 2. Resettlement Action Plan (DRAFT) 3. EIS (Review Report) i 1. Implementation Program (DRAFT) IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM FOR PASIG-MARIKINA RIVER CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (PHASE III) OCTOBER 2011 Pasig-Marikina River Channel Improvement Project (Phase III) Particular Conditions On Preparation of Implementation Program This Implementation Program (I/P) for Reference was prepared to assist the DPWH in preparation of his I/P in accordance with the DPWH’s proposal for implementation of Phase III. For the improvement of Pasig River Channel, the DPWH intends to implement all the Potential Areas including the Priority-3 Group and to complete the Phase III in June 2016. In details, there are major differences between the results of JICA Preparatory Study and DPWH’s proposal, as follows: a) Scope of Works of Phase III JICA Preparatory Study DPWH’s Proposal Improvement of Pasig River Priority-1 and -2 Groups. All Potential Areas (Proority- 1, -2 and -3 Groups) Improvement of Lower Marikina River There is no difference. b) Implementation Schedule of Phase III JICA Preparatory Study DPWH’s Proposal Procurement of DPWH March 2012 to February 2013 March 2012 to August 2012 Consultant (12 months) (6 months) Procurement of Contractors March 2013 to April 2014 September 2012 to June 2013 (14 months) (10 months) Construction Time May 2014 to April 2017 July 2013 to June 2016 (36 months) (36 months) c) Project Cost of Phase III JICA Preparatory Study DPWH’s Proposal P7,361.5 million P8,008.69 million It is assumed that JICA loan in this Implementation Program be provided for the DPWH’s proposed Phase III including Priority-3 Group of Pasig River Improvement. 1-2 PHASE IV (Improvement of Upper Marikina River) PHASE II & III PHASE III (Improvement of Pasig River) (Improvement of Lower Marikina River) PASIG-MARIKINA RIVER CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (PHASE III) IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM TABLE OF CONTENTS LOCATION MAP TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION…………………….… ………………….… 1-1 1.1 Background and Necessity of the Project…………………….… 1-1 1.2 National Policy and Direction for Flood Control..……………… 1-3 1.2.1 Medium-Term Philippine Development Plan (2004 - 2010)……………………………………………………….. 1-3 1.2.2 Medium-Term DPWH Infrastructure Development Plan (2005-2010)………………………………………………… 1-4 1.2.3 Philippine Development Plan……………………………… 1-4 1.3 Objectives of the Project………………..……………………….. 1-5 CHAPTER 2 PRESENT CONDITION OF THE PROJECT AREA……………………………................................................ 2-1 2.1 Project Location………………………………………………..... 2-1 2.2 Climate Condition………………….……………………………. 2-1 2.3 Pasig - Marikina-San Juan - Napindan-Manggahan Channel System…………………………………………………………… 2-1 2.4 Laguna Lake………………………………………… ………….. 2-1 2.5 Environmental Condition…………………………….………….. 2-2 2.5.1 Water Quality………………………………….…………. 2-2 2.5.2 Flora and Fauna……………………………….…………. 2-2 2.6 Socio-economic Condition…..……………………….………….. 2-3 2.6.1 Geographical Jurisdiction of the Concerned Cities/ Municipalities… …………………………….……..…….. 2-3 2.6.2 Demography and Population………………….................. 2-4 2.6.3 Regional Economy and Related Development Plans….… 2-6 2.7 Flooding Condition…………………………………………….… 2-8 2.8 PRRC Project………………………………………………….… 2-12 CHAPTER 3 THE OVERALL FLOOD CONTROL PLAN FOR PASIG- MARIKINA RIVER…………………………………... 3-1 3.1 Major Plans and Existing/Proposed Flood Control Facilities….... 3-1 3.1.1 BPW Master Plan for the Drainage of Manila and Suburbs (1952)………………………………………….. 3-2 3.1.2 Manggahan Floodway……………………….…………… 3-3 3.1.3 Rosario Weir ………...…………………………………... 3-4 3.1.4 Marikina Control Gate Structure (MCGS)………………. 3-5 3.1.5 Napindan Hydraulic Control Structure (NHCS)…………. 3-7 3.2 Updating M/P and F/S for Flood Control of Pasig-Marikina River (JICA)……………………………………………………............. 3-8 i 3.2.1 Updated M/P……………………………………………... 3-8 3.2.2 Proposed Marikina Multipurpose Dam…………………... 3-8 3.2.3 Protection Level on Flood Control by River Channel Improvement…………………………………………….. 3-9 3.3 Urgent Flood Control Project of Pasig-Marikina River (DPWH)…………………………………………………………. 3-10 3.3.1 Project Area……………………………………………… 3-10 3.3.2 Project Scope…………………………………………….. 3-10 3.3.3 Project Scale and Inundation Area………..……………... 3-10 3.3.4 Design Flood Discharge…………………………………. 3-11 3.3.5 River Channel Improvement Plan……………………….. 3-11 3.4 Revised implementation Schedule for Urgent Project Works…… 3-14 3.5 Protection Scale of Improved Channel after Completion of Phase II and Phase III…………………………………………………… 3-14 3.6 Impact of Climate Change………………………………………… 3-15 3.7 With/Without MCGS and Higher Flood Protection Level………... 3-17 CHAPTER 4 THE PROPOSED PHASE III PROJECT……..……………... 4-1 4.1 Ongoing Phase II Project…..………….......................................... 4-1 4.2 Proposed Channel Improvement for the Remaining Sections of the Pasig River…………………..………………….……..…..… 4-3 4.2.1 Remaining Sections of the Pasig River Channel……..…. 4-3 4.2.2 Design of River Structures Proposed at Remaining Sections of Pasig River………………..…………………. 4-6 4.3 Proposed Channel Improvement of the Lower Marikina River……………………………………………………………… 4-8 4.4 Non-Structural Measures………………………………………… 4-11 4.4.1 General…………………………………………………… 4-11 4.4.2 Implementation of Information Campaign and Publicity (ICP)……………………………………………………... 4-11 4.4.3 Establishment of Website………………………………… 4-12 4.4.4 Elaboration of Model Hazard Map and Guideline……….. 4-13 4.4.5 Overseas Training Course……………………………….. 4-14 CHAPTER 5 RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN OF PHASE III PROJECT…………………………………………………… 5-1 5.1 Necessity of Resettlement…..…………………………………… 5-1 5.2 Resettlement Action Plan………………………………………… 5-1 CHAPTER 6 CONSTRUCTION PLAN AND COST ESTIMATE OF PHASE III PROJECT…..……………………………………... 6-1 6.1 Quantity of Major Works………………………………………… 6-1 6.2 Basic Conditions for Construction Plan…………………………. 6-1 6.3 Resources for Construction……………………………………… 6-3 6.4 Construction Method...................................................................... 6-4 6.5 Construction Schedule…………………………………………… 6-5 6.6 Cost Estimate…………………………………………………….. 6-6 6.6.1 General………………………………..…………………… 6-6 6.6.2 Basic Condition for Cost Estimate…………………………. 6-6 6.6.3 Unit Cost Analysis…………………………………………. 6-7 6.6.4 Component of Project Cost…………………………………. 6-8 6.6.5 Estimated Project Cost……………………………………… 6-9 1-ii CHAPTER 7 EVALUATION FOR PHASE III PROJECT………………… 7-1 7.1 Environmental Evaluation……………………………………….. 7-1 7.1.1 Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC)…………….. 7-1 7.1.2 Review of EIS (1998) based on JICA Guideline for Environmental and Social Consideration Revised in April 2010……………………………………………………….. 7-1 7.1.3 Mitigation Measures in Construction of Phase III Project.. 7-4 7.2 Social Evaluation………………………………………………… 7-6 7.3 Economic Evaluation…………………………………………….. 7-7 7.3.1 General…………………………………………………… 7-7 7.3.2 Financial Cost……………………………………………. 7-7 7.3.3 Economic Cost…………………………………………… 7-8 7.3.4 Costs for Operation/Maintenance and Replacement…….. 7-10 7.3.5 Estimation Method of Project Benefit…………………… 7-10 7.3.6 Annual Average Benefit (Value in 2010)………………… 7-12 7.3.7 Economic Analysis………………………………………. 7-20 7.3.8 Sensitivity Analysis……………………………………… 7-20 7.3.9 Effects of the Project and Performance Indicators……… 7-25 CHAPTER 8 IMPLEMENTATION OF PHASE III PROJECT…………… 8-1 8.1 Implementation Agency for Construction……………………..… 8-1 8.2 Proposed Utilization of STEP Loan….….……………................. 8-1 8.3 Procurement Method…………………………………………….. 8-5 8.4 Implementation Schedule…………..……………..……………... 8-5 8.5 Fund Requirement……..………………………………………… 8-7 8.6 Plan for Operation and Maintenance…………………………….. 8-8 8.6.1 MMDA for Operation and Maintenance………………… 8-8 8.6.2 Set-up of Flood Mitigation Committee (FMC)………….. 8-9 8.7 Consulting Engineering Services………………………………… 8-10 8.7.1 Objective and Scope of Services………………………… 8-10 8.7.2 Work Schedule of Consulting Engineering Services……. 8-11 8.7.3 Cost for Consulting Services…………. 8-11 ANNEX-1 Terms of Reference for Consulting Engineering Services on the Detailed Design of Pasig-Marikina River Channel Improvement Project (Phase III) ANNEX-2 Terms of Reference for Consulting Engineering Services on the Construction Supervision of Pasig-Marikina River Channel Improvement Project (Phase III) iii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background and Necessity of the Project The Pasig-Marikina-San Juan River System, of which total catchment area is 635 km2, runs through the center of Metro Manila and flows out to the Manila Bay. Its main tributaries, the San Juan River and Napindan River, join the main stream at about 7.1 km and 17.1 km upstream from the Pasig River mouth, respectively. The three largest waterways contribute largely to the flooding in the metropolis brought about by the riverbank overflow of floodwaters. Metro Manila, which encompasses 16 cities and 1 municipality having a total projected population of over 11 million in 2010, is the economic, political and cultural center of the Philippines. A master plan of flood control for the Pasig-Marikina River including the drainage in Metro Manila was prepared in 1952. In line with the flood control plan, the improvement works of the Pasig River, consisting mainly of river
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Purification Experiments on the Pasig River, Philippines Using a Circulation-Type Purification System
    International Journal of GEOMATE, Feb., 2019 Vol.16, Issue 54, pp.49 - 54 Geotec., Const. Mat. & Env., DOI: https://doi.org/10.21660/2019.54.4735 ISSN: 2186-2982 (Print), 2186-2990 (Online), Japan PURIFICATION EXPERIMENTS ON THE PASIG RIVER, PHILIPPINES USING A CIRCULATION-TYPE PURIFICATION SYSTEM * Okamoto Kyoichi1, Komoriya Tomoe2, Toyama Takeshi1, Hirano Hirosuke3, Garcia Teodinis4, Baccay Melito4, Macasilhig Marjun5, Fortaleza Benedicto4 1 CST, Nihon University, Japan; 2 CIT, Nihon University, Japan; 3 National College of Technology, Wakayama College, Japan; 4 Technological University of the Philippines, Philippines; 5 Technological University of the Philippines, Philippines *Corresponding Author, Received: 20 Oct. 2018, Revised: 29 Nov. 2018, Accepted: 23 Dec. 2018 ABSTRACT: Polluted sludge from the Pasig River generally exerts a very large environmental load to the surrounding area near the vicinity of Laguna de Bay and Manila Bay in the Philippines. Historically, the river was used to be a good route for transportation and an important source of water for the old Spanish Manila. However, the river is now very polluted due to human negligence and industrial development, and biologists consider it unable to sustain aquatic life. Many researchers have conducted studies on the Pasig River, unfortunately, no considerable progress from the point of view of purification process have succeeded. Hence, in this study, the use of fine-bubble technology for the purification of the polluted sludge from the said river is being explored. The critical point in using this technique is on the activation of the bacteria existing in the area using fine bubbles. The sludge is decomposed and purified by activating the aerobic bacteria after creating an aerobic state.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    Formulation of an Integrated River Basin Management and Development Master Plan for Marikina River Basin VOLUME 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION The Philippines, through RBCO-DENR had defined 20 major river basins spread all over the country. These basins are defined as major because of their importance, serving as lifeblood and driver of the economy of communities inside and outside the basins. One of these river basins is the Marikina River Basin (Figure 1). Figure 1 Marikina River Basin Map 1 | P a g e Formulation of an Integrated River Basin Management and Development Master Plan for Marikina River Basin VOLUME 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Marikina River Basin is currently not in its best of condition. Just like other river basins of the Philippines, MRB is faced with problems. These include: a) rapid urban development and rapid increase in population and the consequent excessive and indiscriminate discharge of pollutants and wastes which are; b) Improper land use management and increase in conflicts over land uses and allocation; c) Rapidly depleting water resources and consequent conflicts over water use and allocation; and e) lack of capacity and resources of stakeholders and responsible organizations to pursue appropriate developmental solutions. The consequence of the confluence of the above problems is the decline in the ability of the river basin to provide the goods and services it should ideally provide if it were in desirable state or condition. This is further specifically manifested in its lack of ability to provide the service of preventing or reducing floods in the lower catchments of the basin. There is rising trend in occurrence of floods, water pollution and water induced disasters within and in the lower catchments of the basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Briefing
    WAVES Policy Brieng Philippines Policy October 2015 Brieng Summary Ecosystem Accounts Inform Policies for Better A pilot ecosystem Resource Management of Laguna de Bay account was developed for the Laguna de Bay Laguna de Bay is the largest inland body of water in the Philippines to provide information providing livelihood, food, transportation and recreation to key on ood mitigation capacity, water, shery provinces and cities within and around the metropolitan area of Manila. resource management; Competing uses, unsustainable land and water uses coupled with to identify priority areas population and industrial expansion have caused the rapid degradation for protection, regulation of the lake and its watershed. The data from the ecosystem accounts of pollution and sediment can help counter the factors that are threatening the Laguna de Bay's loading; and to inform water quality and ecology. strategies on water pricing and sustainable Land Cover Condition Water Quality development planning. Land conversion due to urban Pollution coming from domestic, sprawl and rapid industrial industrial and agricultural/forest Background development are causing a decline wastes contribute to the The development of the in forest cover and impacting degradation of the water quality. agriculture production. ecosystem accounts is Fish Production based on data collection Flood Mitigation The lake can still sustain sheries and analysis conducted Increase in soil erosion from the production but is threatened by by the Laguna Lake watershed has changed the pollution. Development Authority contours of the lake. (LLDA), the agency responsible for the water and land management of the Laguna Lake Basin. 2003 2010 Technical staff from the different units of the LLDA undertook the analyses supported by international and local experts under the World Bank's Wealth Accounting and the Valuation of Ecosystem Services (WAVES) Global Partnership Programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Climate Change on the Frequency and Severity of Floods in the Pasig-Marikina River Basin
    E3S Web of Conferences 117, 00005 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201911700005 ICWREE2019 Impact of Climate Change on the Frequency and Severity of Floods in the Pasig-Marikina River Basin Cris Edward Monjardin1,*, Clarence Cabundocan1, Camille Ignacio1 and Christian Jedd Tesnado1 1School of Civil, Environmental and Geolocgical Engineering, Mapua University, 1002 Intramuros Manila, Philippines Abstract. This study assessed impacts of climate change on the frequency and severity of floods in the Pasig-Marikina River basin. Researchers used the historical data from PAG-ASA (Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration), specifically from Science Garden weather station. The historical data are coupled with a global climate model, the Hadley Center Model version 3 (HadCM3) to account for the natural variability of the climate system in the area. The observed data and the hydroclimatic data from HadCM3 was processed in Statistical Downscaling Model (SDSM) that results to rainfall data from 1961-2017 and change in temperature data from 2018-2048. A rainfall time series for the river basin was generated considering average seasonal effects in the area. A flood frequency curve was modelled. From that, flood value for 2048 was derived to be at 3950cu.m/s. Additionally, the rapid urbanization in the area has contributed to the changes in the river system making it more vulnerable to floods. The results of this study supports the claim that the Pasig-Marikina River basin will be affected by the climate variability in terms of the increase in rainfall depth and average temperatures, higher flood frequency and more massive floods in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Pasig River Pasig River Rehabilitation Commission
    PASIG RIVER REHABILITATION COMMISSION OUTLINE OF THE PRESENTATION I. SITUATIONER A. BIOPHYSICAL B. GEOPOLITICAL C. CHALLENGES II. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND A. INSTITUTIONAL B. ACTIVITIES AND PROGRAMS C. MASTERPLAN III. PRRC A. MANDATE B. POWER/FUNCTIONS C. PARTNER AGENCIES D. PROGRAMS/PROJECTS 1. COMPLETED 2. ONGOING IV. PROPOSED PROJECT A. TROMMET I. SITUATIONER The Pasig River System Boundaries EtEast LgLaguna de Bay West Manila Bay North Manila, Mandaluyong, Pasig South Manila, Makati, Pateros Length: 27 Kms Average Width 91 m Average Depth 4 m Water Volume 6.548 million m3 Low Flow, March to May 12 m3 /sec High Flow, October to November 275 m3/sec Depth Deepest: 6 m Shallowest: 2 m I. SITUATIONER Cities and Municipalities in the Project Area: •Makati •Mandaluyong •Manila •Marikina •Pasig •Pateros •Quezon City •San Juan •Taguig I. SITUATIONER CURRENT CONDITIONS Existing informal settlers along river bkbanks to be reltdlocated. I. SITUATIONER CURRENT CONDITIONS Floating Garbage from Minor and Major Tributaries draining in Main River I. SITUATIONER CURRENT CONDITIONS Domestic and Industrial Wastewater I. SITUATIONER SOURCES OF POLLUTION 5% Solid Waste 30% Industrial Waste 65% Domestic Waste I. SITUATIONER WATER QUALITY OF PASIG RIVER Pasig River Annual Average DO Level 8 Pas s ed 6 4 mg/L Failed 2 0 2007 as 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 of 2nd Qtr Marikina 5 4.2 5.36 6.34 5.26 4.71 2.85 2.74 3.7 Bambang 4.59 5.97 6.43 5.60 4.32 4.45 5.24 4.58 6.13 Lambingan 3.41 4.84 4.42 4.93 2.90 2.57 2.31 2.76 3.93 Sanchez 0.65 0.04 0.91 1.20 1.49 0.55 0.62 0.28 1.45 Jones 2.47 3.56 3.37 4.79 2.77 1.29 1.76 1.37 3.60 DENR Standard: > mg/l= passed; <5mg/l= failed I.
    [Show full text]
  • Urbanization and Related Environmental Issues Of
    Journal of Advanced College of Engineering and Management, Vol. 3, 2017 URBANIZATION AND RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES OF METRO MANILA Ram Krishna Regmi Environment and Resource Management Consultant, Kathmandu, Nepal Email Address: [email protected] __________________________________________________________________________________ Abstract Due to rapid urbanization, Metro Manila is facing many environmental challenges with its continuous accelerating urban growth rate. According to 2010 census of population Metro Manila accounts about one-third of the total urban population and about 13% of the total national population of Philippines.The impact of urban growth of the Metro Manila to its urban environment relating on demography, solid wastes problem and problems in water bodies as well as air pollution and greenhouse gas emissionis emphasized here in this study.The flood prone areas within the Metro Manila is about 31%, most of the risk areas located along creeks, river banks or coastal areas.Metro Manila produces total garbage equivalent to 25% of the national waste generation in which about 17% is paper wastes and about 16% are plastics. In terms of water quality classification the upper reaches of the Marikina River is of Class A, but all remaining river systems are of Class C. Accordingly, the classification of Manila Bay is of Class SB. Similarly, the quality of ambient air of the Metro Manila is also poor. Using 2010 as base year, the major contributor to greenhouse gas is from vehicular emissions followed by the stationary sources. An urgent need is felt to incorporate environmental issues into planning its urban area to reduce the risks of further environmental degradation. Keywords: Metro Manila; urbanization; environmental issues; solid wastes;water quality; air pollution _________________________________________________________________________________ 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of Indicators in Urban and Megacities Disaster Risk Management
    Progress Report EMI Topical Report TR-07-01 Earthquakes and Megacities Initiative A member of the U.N. Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction 3cd Program Application of Indicators in Urban and Megacities Disaster Risk Management A Case Study of Metro Manila September 2006 Copyright © 2007 EMI. Permission to use this document is granted provided that the copyright notice appears in all reproductions and that both the copyright and this permission notice appear, and use of document or parts thereof is for educational, informational, and non-commercial or personal use only. EMI must be acknowledged in all cases as the source when reproducing any part of this publication. Opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily refl ect those of the participating agencies and organizations. Report prepared by Jeannette Fernandez, Shirley Mattingly, Fouad Bendimerad and Omar D. Cardona Dr. Martha-Liliana Carreño, Researcher (CIMNE, UPC) Ms. Jeannette Fernandez, Project Manager (EMI/PDC) Layout and Cover Design: Kristoffer Berse Printed in the Philippines by EMI An international, not-for-profi t, scientifi c organization dedicated to disaster risk reduction of the world’s megacities EMI 2F Puno Bldg. Annex, 47 Kalayaan Ave., Diliman Quezon City 1101, Philippines T/F: +63-2-9279643; T: +63-2-4334074 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.emi-megacities.org 3cd Program EMI Topical Report TR-07-01 Application of Indicators in Urban and Megacities Disaster Risk Management A Case Study of Metro Manila By Jeannette Fernandez, Shirley Mattingly, Fouad Bendimerad and Omar D. Cardona Contributors Earthquakes and Megacities Initiative, EMI Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Pasig City, Philippines
    City Profile: Pasig City (Philippines) IKI Ambitious City Promises project As of 12 December 2017 City Overview Considered as one of the most economically Population 755,000 (2015) dynamic cities in the Philippines, Pasig City is a 2 residential, industrial and commercial hub hosting Area (km ) 34.32 at least 755,000 people. It is among the top ten Main geography type Inland most populous cities in the Philippines based on Tertiary sector Main economy sector the latest population census and is located in busy (services) and compact Metro Manila, the National Capital Annual gov. operational 216,338,274 Region (NCR) of the country budget (USD) With rapid urbanization and commercialization, GHG emissions 1,446,461.37 (2010) the local government of Pasig City recognizes the Emissions target 10% by 2020 (BAU) impact of these transformations to climate change and worsening air pollution. Hence, there is a need Governor Robert C. Eusebio for a more sustainable model of progress. No. of gov. employee 7,748 GHG emissions The city has completed its community-level GHG emissions inventory with 2010 as base year. The electricity consumption gets the lion’s share of GHG emissions in the city amounting to 39% (562,885.49 tCO2e). This was followed by the transport sector at 29%, waste at 16% and then stationary energy and industry at 12% and 4% respectively. The total emissions of the city is 1,446,461.47 tCO2e. As part of their commitment to contribute to the national government’s climate change mitigation goals, Pasig City pledged to reduce their GHG emissions by 10% by 2020 from buisiness as usual levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Country Office Philippines Health Cluster Situation Report
    WHO COUNTRY OFFICE PHILIPPINES HEALTH CLUSTER SITUATION REPORT 6 October 2009 HIGHLIGHTS • 805 799 families (3 929 030 individuals) affected in 1 786 barangays, 70 739 families (335 740individuals) in 559 evacuation centres • DSWD reports that as 15 775 families in 40 barangays in 7 cities are still flooded • Casualties: 295 Dead, 5 injured, 39 missing • More than Php 835.6M (USD 17.4M) in damage to health facilities reported • The top 5 morbidity cases in the evacuation centers are: upper respiratory tract infection, fever, skin disease, infected wounds and diarrhea • DOH dispatched 119 Medical, 11 Psychosocial, and 6 WASH Teams, 12 Assessment/Surveillance, 3 Public Health, and 5 Nutrition teams to 99 sites • Logistical support provided for Health and WASH clusters by DOH has amounted to Php 19,742,610.37 (USD 411 304) • Majority of Hospital Operations have resumed with free services to victims • CERF proposal for USD 830 000 has been approved, FLASH appeal posted on ReliefWeb HEALTH SITUATION ASSESSMENT • NDCC reported that the number of evacuees increased to 70 739 families ( 335 740 individuals). Number of evacuation centers has increased to 559 . Total number of affected increased to 805 799 families ( 3 929 030 individuals) in 1 786 barangays. • Access to essential health services: DSWD reports that as 15 775 families in 40 barangays in 7 cities are still flooded and are not reached by aid (as of 2 October 2009). DOH estimates at least Php 635.6M (USD 17.4M) in damage was sustained by health facilities (16 hospitals, 2 rural health units, 74 municipal health centers, one lying-in clinic, one provincial health office), ranging from submerged ground floors to damage and destruction of medical supplies and equipment, records, and office equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Maynilad Water Services, Inc. Public Disclosure Authorized
    Fall 08 Maynilad Water Services, Inc. Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Valenzuela Sewerage System Project Environmental Assessment Report Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized M a r c h 2 0 1 4 Environmental Assessment Report VALENZUELA SEWERAGE SYSTEM PROJECT CONTENTS Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Project Fact Sheet ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Brief Description of the Project .................................................................................................................. 8 A. Project Location ............................................................................................................................. 8 B. Project Components ....................................................................................................................... 9 C. Project Rationale .......................................................................................................................... 10 D. Project Cost .................................................................................................................................. 10 E. Project Phases ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Philippines: Pasig River Environmental Management and Rehabilitation Sector Development Program
    Validation Report Reference Number: PVR–187 Project Number: 30308 Loan Numbers: 1745 and 1746 November 2012 Philippines: Pasig River Environmental Management and Rehabilitation Sector Development Program Independent Evaluation Department ABBREVIATIONS ADB − Asian Development Bank BOD − biochemical oxygen demand DENR − Department of Environment and Natural Resources EPA − environmental preservation area LGU − local government unit MMDA − Metropolitan Manila Development Authority MWSS − Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System PRRC − Pasig River Rehabilitation Commission URA − urban renewal area NOTE In this report, “$” refers to US dollars. Key Words asian development bank, development, environment, estuary, evaluation, management, pasig, philippines, pollution, rehabilitation, river, sewerage, urban renewal, waterworks The guidelines formally adopted by the Independent Evaluation Department (IED) on avoiding conflict of interest in its independent evaluations were observed in the preparation of this report. To the knowledge of IED management, there were no conflicts of interest of the persons preparing, reviewing, or approving this report. In preparing any evaluation report, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, IED does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. PROGRAM BASIC DATA Project Number: 30308 PCR Circulation Date: Dec 2010 Loan Numbers: 1745 and 1746 PCR Validation Date: Nov 2012 Project Name: Pasig River
    [Show full text]
  • DPWH: Strategic Infrastructure Programs and Policies
    DPWH: Strategic Infrastructure Programs and Policies Secretary Mark A. Villar Department of Public Works and Highways 1 Increased Infrastructure Investments to Drive Long-Term Economic Growth Enhanced fiscal flexibility to support infrastructure development 2011-2019 DPWH Total Budget (Amount in bn) USD 12.6 PHP 650.9 USD 9.1 PHP 467.7 USD 7.7 PHP 397.1 USD 5.9 PHP 303.2 USD 4.3 USD 3.3 PHP 219.3 USD 2.1 USD 2.4 PHP 169.3 PHP 110.6 PHP 125.7 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Note: Exchange rate used is midpoint of DBCC exchange rate assumption as of July 2, 2018 of USD50-53 for 2018 2 DPWH Strategic Infrastructure Programs and Policies Traffic Decongestion Program • Implement High Standard Highways (HSH)/expressways; construct/widen national roads and bridges; construct by- passes/diversion roads; and construct flyovers, interchanges and underpasses • Update the HSH Network Development Masterplan • FY2017 PHP113.1bn (USD 2.2bn); FY2018 PHP149.7bn (USD2.9bn) Integrated and Seamless Transport System • Mindanao Infrastructure Logistics Network (MLIN); construct/improve roads leading to growth corridors in Western Mindanao; study and implement inter-island linkage projects; connect gaps along national roads; and construct/replace bridges • FY2017 PHP88.0bn (USD1.7bn); FY2018 PHP101.5bn (USD2.0bn) Convergence and Rural Road Development Program • Construct/upgrade local access roads to designated tourism destinations, RORO ports/seaports and airports; and construct/improve roads leading to industrial trade corridors • FY2017 PHP18.1bn
    [Show full text]