Connecting the Dots in the Forest– Migration Nexus a Case Study from Malinau, Indonesia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
WORKING PAPER 250 Connecting the dots in the forest– migration nexus A case study from Malinau, Indonesia Kartika Sari Juniwaty Bimbika Sijapati Basnett Paul Hasan Thung I Made Sanjaya Muhammad Iqbal Busra Working Paper 250 Connecting the dots in the forest– migration nexus A case study from Malinau, Indonesia Kartika Sari Juniwaty CIFOR Bimbika Sijapati Basnett CIFOR Paul Hasan Thung Brunel University London I Made Sanjaya CIFOR Muhammad Iqbal Busra CIFOR Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) Working Paper 250 © 2019 Center for International Forestry Research Content in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ DOI: 10.17528/cifor/007306 Juniwaty KS, Basnett BS, Thung PH, Sanjaya IM and Busra MI. 2019. Connecting the dots in the forest–migration nexus: A case study from Malinau, Indonesia. Working Paper 250. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR. CIFOR Jl. CIFOR, Situ Gede Bogor Barat 16115 Indonesia T +62 (251) 8622-622 F +62 (251) 8622-100 E [email protected] cifor.org We would like to thank all funding partners who supported this research through their contributions to the CGIAR Fund. For a full list of the ‘CGIAR Fund’ funding partners please see: http://www.cgiar.org/our-funders/ Any views expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of CIFOR, the editors, the authors’ institutions, the financial sponsors or the reviewers. Contents Acknowledgments v Executive summary vi 1 Introduction 1 2 Migration and forests in Indonesia: Gaps and scope for further analyses 3 3 Conceptual framework 5 4 Research context 6 4.1 Forest cover, political commitment and persistent challenges 6 4.2 FORCLIME TC (GIZ) operations in Malinau 7 4.3 CIFOR’s operations in Malinau 8 4.4 Documented migration history into and out of the forest frontier 8 5 Research methodology 10 5.1 Field data collection 10 5.2 Remote-sensing data analyses 11 5.3 Workshops with policy makers and researchers 13 6 Overview of research context: Villages and households 15 6.1 Overview of the villages: Social history of land and forest use 15 6.2 Overview of household characteristics 20 7 Key findings and discussion 24 7.1 Topic 1: Migration patterns 24 7.2 Topic 2: The forest–migration nexus 34 7.3 Topic 3: Links to policy 46 8 Conclusion and recommendations for policy and practice 50 References 53 Appendices 1 Detailed field data collection procedure 58 2 Information on selected forest products to estimate income 61 3 Technical information on remote-sensing data analysis 63 4 Household questionnaires 66 5 In-depth interviews and focus group discussions questions 84 iii List of figures, tables and boxes Figures 1 Map of the research sites in Upper and Lower Malinau 9 2 Overview of research topics and methodology 10 3 Chronology of field data collection 11 4 The land-cover classification process 12 5 Reasons for migration 25 6 Educational attainment by youth cohort 25 7 Destinations of education migrants from Lower Malinau 27 8 Destinations of education migrants from Upper Malinau 27 9 Frequency and amount of transfers from households to education migrants 28 10 Land cover in Malinau 1990 and 2017 42 11 Deforestation and forest degradation map between 1990 and 2017 42 12 Land-cover maps of the four research sites for 2016 and 2018 43-44 Tables 1 List of participants in national and subnational workshop 13 2 Overview of village characteristics 16 3 Descriptive statistics: Household characteristics 21 4 Descriptive statistics: Source of livelihoods 21 5 Descriptive statistics: Household–forest relationship 23 6 Source, size and frequency of scholarships received by migrants 29 7 Comparison of commodity prices 31 8 Change in livelihood strategies of Upper Malinau migrant-sending households 35 9 Current livelihood strategies in Lower Malinau migrant-sending households 36 10 Simulation of effort needed to finance one educational migrant from forest product collection 38 11 Percentage of migrants recognized by parents as making a ‘very important contribution’ to work activities 39 12 Land-cover change at the four research sites from 2016 to 2018 45 Boxes 1 Expansion of scholarships for higher education 30 2 Estimating the costs of migration 31 iv Acknowledgments We would like to express our sincere gratitude to Christine Padoch, who initiated the research project and guided us throughout the research process. We wish to acknowledge the research assistance provided by Nugroho Adi Utomo, Bambang Trihatmodjo, Benita Nathania, Rilin Purwati, Andes Nofita, Ratna Purba and Ratna Tondang, as well as the Center for Social Forestry Universitas Mulawarman, who partnered with us in the household surveys. We thank Peter Cronkleton, Houria Djoudi, Moira Moeliono, Habtemariam Kassa, Christopher Martius, Cynthia Maharani and Shintia Arwida, for their input and suggestions during the writing process, and Indrawan Suryadi and Yves Laumonier, for input and suggestions in GIS analysis. We are grateful to Rita Hasibuan and Kuntum Melati for their administrative support throughout the project. We would also like to thank our partners, the Forests and Climate Change Programme (both Technical Cooperation and Financial Cooperation), for their support, input and guidance in the research and workshop process. FORCLIME is an Indonesian–German partnership. It has the overall objective of reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the forest sector, while improving the livelihoods of Indonesia’s poor rural communities. This working paper is a technical report for the research project “Understanding migration and remittances to improve forest management projects and policies”, which is conducted with the financial support of the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, Germany. This working paper is a synthesis of findings on three interrelated topics. v Executive summary The link between migration and sustainable development has garnered much attention in recent years. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) reflect an increased awareness of the importance of migration for development. SDG 10, on reducing inequalities within and among countries, explicitly aims to “facilitate orderly, safe, regular and responsible migration and mobility of people”. This stems from a recognition that better management of migration will protect the well-being of a vulnerable demographic, and harness migrants’ contribution to inclusive development. SDG 17 further recognizes remittances as a way of mobilizing additional finances for developing countries from multiple sources. However, in their focus on well-being and development, the SDGs fail to address how the social and economic aspects of migration are linked to the environment. The framing of migration and remittances in SDG 10 and SDG 17 does not acknowledge the complementarities, connections and tradeoffs between migration, remittances and environmental sustainability, nor ways in which ‘managed’ migration can be leveraged for greater environmental sustainability (Sijapati Basnett et al. forthcoming). In-depth research exploring the nexus of migration, remittances and forests is needed to address these issues. However, research on migration, on the one hand, and on forest-based livelihoods, on the other, often overlooks the connections between migration and forests. The scant literature that exists on the topic tends to be based on simplistic assumptions that tropical deforestation is an outcome of migration into forests or that forest recovery is a consequence of out-migration. Both of these potential impacts on forests occur in some, but not all, cases. The mediating factors – social, economic, political, spatial and historical – that determine these outcomes are still little researched and narrowly understood (Hecht et al. 2015). The Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) is currently leading a research program on the links between migration, remittances and forests. The aims are to enable policy makers and other stakeholders to improve forest management practices and policies, and to contribute toward global debates on the value of forests for socially responsive and environmentally just landscapes. Research is underway in a number of countries. This working paper is part of a three-country study on “Understanding migration and remittances to improve forest management projects and policies”, financially supported by the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, Germany. For this Indonesia case study, we partnered with The German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ)-Forest and Climate Change (FORCLIME) program. FORCLIME is supporting the Government of Indonesia in its efforts to mitigate the effects of climate change through forestry sector reform, capacity development and implementation of best management practices for sustainable forest management and biodiversity conservation. Literature on migration and forests in Indonesia mostly focuses on the effect of migration on forest in the destination areas. In this research, we focused on migrant-sending areas. We explored three aspects of the relationship between migration and forests: 1. Changes and continuities in migration patterns 2. The interrelationship between migration and forests 3. The implications of the research results for policy reforms on social forestry. First, we traced changes in recent migration patterns and the factors contributing to the observed changes. Second, we examined the observable changes