DOCSLIB.ORG

Prepared for LSC Madison Trip in March 2016 Version 02262016 This Is Supplemental This Year to the Paper Handout

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prepared for LSC Madison Trip in March 2016 Version 02262016 This Is Supplemental This Year to the Paper Handout Jay Moynihan Community Resource Development Room 101 Shawano County Courthouse 311 N. Main street Shawano, Wisconsin 54166 U.S.A. (715) 526 – 6136 [email protected] Prepared for LSC Madison Trip in March 2016 Version 02262016 This is supplemental this year to the paper handout. Shoreline land Use Contents: Issues as viewed by…. page 1 Science Meets Policy….page 1 The Basic Science….page 2 State government systemic diagrams page 7 Jay’s Three Rules of Understanding What Politicians Do, …. page 8 A brief, 100,000 foot View of Shoreline Zoning and Riparian Rights in Wisconsin…. page 9 Power of Words page 11 A Sketch of a Viewpoint Tendency Continuum …. Page 13 Two important factors in any political debate: Economic Interest and Ideology Page 14 ___________________________________ Issues as viewed by: Wisconsin League of Conservation Voters http://conservationvoters.org/issues/oppose-the-kneecapping-local-communities-bill/ http://conservationvoters.org/issues/special-interest-grab-bag/ Wisconsin Realtors Association The link on their site re The Environment & Land Use has been down for a awhile. Here are PDF legislative reports, that contain some entries re zoning/shoreline issues. https://www.wra.org/Priorities/ A news release from WRA on Act 55 (the 2015-2017 budget) impact on shoreline zoning https://www.wra.org/WREM/July15/Shoreland/ Science Meets Policy Material on the issue from the Wisconsin Lakes Association http://www.wisconsinlakes.org/index.php/shoreland-and-waterways http://www.wisconsinlakes.org/index.php/shorelands-a-shallows 1 The Basic Science: The really basic science: 1. Water runs down hill 2. Water is a “universal” solvent. Water dissolves almost everything. It can do it by our standards quickly: Or so slow, you may not live long enough to see the result: 2 Every freshwater river, stream and lake have a “Watershed”: Is a drainage area, where surface water from rain, melting snow, or ice flow/converge to a lower elevation, usually a waterbody, such as a river, lake, reservoir, estuary, wetland, sea, or ocean. Example: Shawano Lake Watershed 3 Water in Shawano Lake: ü Comes in from watercourses that empty into it, rain, boaters, and what runs off the shoreline ü Flows into the Wolf River Watershed ü Flows into Lake Winnebago ü Flows into the fox River Watershed ü Then into the Green Bay of the Lake Michigan Watershed ü Into Lake Michigan ü Then Lake Huron ü Then Lake Erie ü Flows into the St. Lawrence River ü Finally, into the Atlantic Ocean Scientifically, what is “Water Quality” Science can tell you about water, but its “quality” depends on the non-science question, …well, for what purpose? Generally, the default mindset of a scientist is water “quality” is judged by how well it works in the normal functioning of animal, plant and Fungi cells. For living things on earth, water is the most important thing. You for example are about 60% made of water if you are an adult. If you are a baby, it is about 75%. Lets call this the “Cellular View” Historically, there is a strong link between human quality of life and the amount of fresh water available and its quality in the cellular sense. The quality of the water in water “body” equals, A dynamic set of factors of dissolved chemistry and particulate matter in a multi-scale, multi causal interaction; comprised of: · What falls into it · What flows into it · What drains off the shore into it · The relevant characteristics of the flora and fauna in it · If there is a spring in it, upwelled ground water The future of fresh water Fresh water will be here for a very long time. We can deduce that from what we have learned about water in Mar’s past wetter nature, and extremely dry present, and around the rest of the solar system. The interesting part for us, is the fresh water available bottom line. Fresh water for putting into our bodies and growing food. All monitoring and studies conclusively predict that quality fresh water (using the “cellular view” of quality is decreasing on a planetary basis. Apparent causality is the combination of factors: · Groundwater aquifers being pumped at a rate & amount by humans past their recharge rate and water available to them via the water cycle 4 · Salinization during use in human agriculture · Apparent increasing evaporation rates · Increased glacial melt1 and its increasing rapidity · Increasing toxification2 · Decreasing number of fresh surface water bodies3 Current use information: 1 Spring/summer run off from glaciers is the major source of surface fresh water for much of the world’s population. It eventually runs into ocean and becomes salt water. 2 I use a very simple definition for toxic; anything chemistry that interferes with a cellular process. Something is Toxic to a varying degree to different living things. If the chemistry in question is disruptive of human cells or animals or plants we rely on, then I use the phrase word toxification. 3 Human eradication of wetlands, ponds, and drawdowns, etc. In some locations, natural processes accelerated by rapid climate change. 5 Next page 6 7 Jay’s Three Rules of Understanding What Any Politicians Do Above the Rural-Local Level 1. The Golden Rule, i.e., those with the gold make the rules 2. If you want to figure out their motive, do not rely only on what they say. Instead, study the measure, analyze its impact on the relevant different types of people/groups, and then make the assumption the politician knows what he or she is doing 3. Follow the money Next page 8 A brief, 100,000 foot View of Shoreline Zoning and Riparian Rights in Wisconsin Shortly after Republican President Theodore Roosevelt came to office in 1901, he sent his Secretary of Agriculture to a national forestry convention in Chicago. There, in explaining Teddy’s new Forestry Service, the secretary told the assembled logging company folks that if they did abandon the mining model of forestry and adopt the agricultural model of it, they would be nationalized. They knew Teddy did not bluff. So, among other things, the cutover that was the northern half of Wisconsin was done. The lumber companies who still owned the land advertised in European papers to sell “cheap land” to any immigrant who could use a plow. Many came. As the land filled, the way folks used land would tend to conflict with neighboring uses. You see, there was no zoning. You could put the dynamite shed next to the school next door. If the shed exploded, the shed owner would be liable for the resulting damage to person and property at the school. Sounds fair, right? Then there were the random fires, the garbage going into the river from your slaughter house, and the neighbors complaining. Etc. Local Governance So the Republican controlled Progressive state government came up with a new concept called “rural zoning”. The rest is the history of land use planning and regulation. One remnant of the Progressive days, was the idea that control over zoning should be held as locally as possible. So the counties, towns villages and cities were given the zoning powers and the power to regulate land use. “Big Government” and “Unfunded Mandates” Starting in the late 1960’s and the 1970’s that changed. As we began to realize the extent of the environmental mess we had, a mess that did not obey political boundaries. A bi-partisan state government started to mandate some scientifically based local zoning, land use and water quality requirements. As the years past, the state role grew. In the 1980’s the Wisconsin Republicans and Democrats started to have different views about “the environment” in principle. The state interference with local control though did not end. Parry & Thrust As the 1980’s rolled into the early 1990’s the two parties dueled along the following line, neither of which substantively aided local control over decision making. The Democrats tried to maintain a semblance of “science” based regulation, while the Republicans worked to eliminate regulatory roadblocks on land use and water quality that might lie in the path of some businesses and developers. By the beginning years of the new millennium, they had fought to a stalemate. In 2010 - present, the Republicans upped the ante more with their 9 own state level shoreline zoning and other water regulation of local land and water. Correspondingly, local government control decreased. In conversations with Republican friends they appear not to perceive this as their own form of “big government”, since it gives individuals and businesses more choices. This is consistent with the rise of neoliberal thought and resulting changes. Those that see current state republican bills as “big government,” tend to differentiate between “public” and the “private” along more traditional lines.. That is the classic small r republican (res publica i.e. the public thing) view wherein people through elected government govern what is shared between individuals. Traditionally, they wanted the governing as local as possible. Residential land on the edge of a water body is more valuable monetarily than the same land inland, all other things being equal. The battle at the shoreline reflects broad, interesting changes in Wisconsin politics over the last 150 years. Ø The rise in the mid 19th century in Wisconsin of a farm/labor party opposed for economic reasons to slavery, ( the Republican Party) Ø This was in opposition to the status quo party made up of Northern financial interests and the South, that held strongly to the “sanctity” of property & contract (Democrats) Ø The entry into power at the national level
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SEWER SYNDICALISM: WORKER SELF- MANAGEMENT in PUBLIC SERVICES Eric M
    \\jciprod01\productn\N\NVJ\14-2\NVJ208.txt unknown Seq: 1 30-APR-14 10:47 SEWER SYNDICALISM: WORKER SELF- MANAGEMENT IN PUBLIC SERVICES Eric M. Fink* Staat ist ein Verh¨altnis, ist eine Beziehung zwischen den Menschen, ist eine Art, wie die Menschen sich zu einander verhalten; und man zerst¨ort ihn, indem man andere Beziehungen eingeht, indem man sich anders zu einander verh¨alt.1 I. INTRODUCTION In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, municipal govern- ments in various US cities assumed responsibility for utilities and other ser- vices that previously had been privately operated. In the late twentieth century, prompted by fiscal crisis and encouraged by neo-liberal ideology, governments embraced the concept of “privatization,” shifting management and control over public services2 to private entities. Despite disagreements over the merits of privatization, both proponents and opponents accept the premise of a fundamental distinction between the “public” and “private” sectors, and between “state” and “market” institutions. A more skeptical view questions the analytical soundness and practical signifi- cance of these dichotomies. In this view, “privatization” is best understood as a rhetorical strategy, part of a broader neo-liberal ideology that relies on putative antinomies of “public” v. “private” and “state” v. “market” to obscure and rein- force social and economic power relations. While “privatization” may be an ideological definition of the situation, for public service workers the difference between employment in the “public” and “private” sectors can be real in its consequences3 for job security, compensa- * Associate Professor of Law, Elon University School of Law, Greensboro, North Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • Libertarian Municipalism: an Overview
    Murray Bookchin Libertarian Municipalism: An Overview 1991 The Anarchist Library Contents A Civic Ethics............................. 3 Means and Ends ........................... 4 Confederalism............................. 5 Municipalizing the Economy .................... 7 Addendum ............................... 9 2 Perhaps the greatest single failing of movements for social recon- struction — I refer particularly to the Left, to radical ecology groups, and to organizations that profess to speak for the oppressed — is their lack of a politics that will carry people beyond the limits es- tablished by the status quo. Politics today means duels between top-down bureaucratic parties for elec- toral office, that offer vacuous programs for “social justice” to attract a nonde- script “electorate.” Once in office, their programs usually turn into a bouquet of “compromises.” In this respect, many Green parties in Europe have been only marginally different from conventional parliamentary parties. Nor have so- cialist parties, with all their various labels, exhibited any basic differences from their capitalist counter parts. To be sure, the indifference of the Euro-American public — its “apoliticism” — is understandably depressing. Given their low expectations, when people do vote, they normally turn to established parties if only because, as centers of power, they cart produce results of sorts in practical matters. If one bothers to vote, most people reason, why waste a vote on a new marginal organization that has all the characteristics of the major ones and that will eventually become corrupted if it succeeds? Witness the German Greens, whose internal and public life increasingly approximates that of other parties in the new Reich. That this “political process” has lingered on with almost no basic alteration for decades now is due in great part to the inertia of the process itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Brazilian Images of the United States, 1861-1898: a Working Version of Modernity?
    Brazilian images of the United States, 1861-1898: A working version of modernity? Natalia Bas University College London PhD thesis I, Natalia Bas, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Abstract For most of the nineteenth-century, the Brazilian liberal elites found in the ‘modernity’ of the European Enlightenment all that they considered best at the time. Britain and France, in particular, provided them with the paradigms of a modern civilisation. This thesis, however, challenges and complements this view by demonstrating that as early as the 1860s the United States began to emerge as a new model of civilisation in the Brazilian debate about modernisation. The general picture portrayed by the historiography of nineteenth-century Brazil is still today inclined to overlook the meaningful place that U.S. society had from as early as the 1860s in the Brazilian imagination regarding the concept of a modern society. This thesis shows how the images of the United States were a pivotal source of political and cultural inspiration for the political and intellectual elites of the second half of the nineteenth century concerned with the modernisation of Brazil. Drawing primarily on parliamentary debates, newspaper articles, diplomatic correspondence, books, student journals and textual and pictorial advertisements in newspapers, this dissertation analyses four different dimensions of the Brazilian representations of the United States. They are: the abolition of slavery, political and civil freedoms, democratic access to scientific and applied education, and democratic access to goods of consumption.
    [Show full text]
  • China Perspectives, 55 | September - October 2004 the Debate Between Liberalism and Neo-Leftism at the Turn of the Century 2
    China Perspectives 55 | september - october 2004 Varia The Debate Between Liberalism and Neo-Leftism at the Turn of the Century Chen Lichuan Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/417 DOI: 10.4000/chinaperspectives.417 ISSN: 1996-4617 Publisher Centre d'étude français sur la Chine contemporaine Printed version Date of publication: 1 October 2004 ISSN: 2070-3449 Electronic reference Chen Lichuan, « The Debate Between Liberalism and Neo-Leftism at the Turn of the Century », China Perspectives [Online], 55 | september - october 2004, Online since 29 December 2008, connection on 28 October 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/417 ; DOI : 10.4000/ chinaperspectives.417 This text was automatically generated on 28 October 2019. © All rights reserved The Debate Between Liberalism and Neo-Leftism at the Turn of the Century 1 The Debate Between Liberalism and Neo-Leftism at the Turn of the Century Chen Lichuan EDITOR'S NOTE Translated from the French original by Nick Oates 1 From the beginning of the 1980s to the middle of the 1990s, three movements took centre stage on the Chinese intellectual scene: radicalism, conservatism and liberalism. This article sets out to retrace the debate between liberalism and neo-leftism by relying exclusively on the polemical texts of the Chinese writers1. How can we present an intellectual debate that is a process of questioning and clarification and that does not arrive at a consensual conclusion? How can we render intelligible the concepts debated in extracts from the original texts? How can we evaluate the impact that this debate has had on a society undergoing a profound transformation? These are just some of the difficulties with which we were confronted.
    [Show full text]
  • Hannes Gissurarson's Hayek's Conservative Liberalism
    Hayek's Conservative Liberalism. By Hannes H. Gissurarson. New York: Garland Publishing. 1987. Hannes H. Gissurarson's ~ayek5Conservative Liberalism, is a four-chapter dissertation work for Oxford University, attempts to answer some weighty questions regarding the politico-economic philosophy of FA. Hayek, a Nobel laureate in economics and a profound political philosopher of this century. The questions that Gissaurarson seems to have in mind can be divided into two distinct groups. First, is the politico-economic philosophy of Hayek a coherent whole? Do its various threads-anti-rationalism, in- dividualism, traditionalism, spontaneous order, evolutionism, radi- cal policy proposals (denationalization of money, for example)- mesh together? Moreover, what is the structure of the relationship between these threads? Is it like a web, where all threads are independent and equally important though interconnected?Or like a cotton pollen with threads emanatingfirom a center and extending in various directions? Second, does Hqyek belong to the camp of either conservatives, (classical) liberals or libertarians? Or does he defy these typical categories and demand a new one? The answer to the second query is in the title of the book, and Gissaurarson erects a new castle of c~onservativeliberalism for Hayek on the road stretching from conservatism to anarcho- capitalism. He argues that Hayek's anti-rationalism and traditionalism sets him apart form the liberals, while his in- dividualism and radicalism differentiates him from the conserva- tives; but, he continues, the tension bet'ween tlie conservative and the liberal threads in Hayek's thought is apparent. Hayek's theory of spontaneous order, Gissaurarson colitends, serves as a center holding the threads that extend in see~ninglyopposite directions.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture War, Rhetorical Education, and Democratic Virtue Beth Jorgensen Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2002 Takin' it to the streets: culture war, rhetorical education, and democratic virtue Beth Jorgensen Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Philosophy Commons, Rhetoric and Composition Commons, Social and Philosophical Foundations of Education Commons, and the Speech and Rhetorical Studies Commons Recommended Citation Jorgensen, Beth, "Takin' it to the streets: culture war, rhetorical education, and democratic virtue " (2002). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 969. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/969 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, white others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bieedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Conservatives Should Support the Free Market
    WHY CONSERVATIVES SHOULD SUPPORT THE FREE MARKET HANNES H. GISSURARSON www.europeanreform.org @europeanreform Established by Margaret Thatcher, New Direction is Europe’s leading free market political foundation & publisher with offices in Brussels, London, Rome & Warsaw. New Direction is registered in Belgium as a not-for-profit organisation and is partly funded by the European Parliament. REGISTERED OFFICE: Rue du Trône, 4, 1000 Brussels, Belgium. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Naweed Khan. www.europeanreform.org @europeanreform The European Parliament and New Direction assume no responsibility for the opinions expressed in this publication. Sole liability rests with the author. AUTHOR TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 6 2 THE CONSERVATIVE-LIBERAL TRADITION FROM BURKE TO MENGER 9 3 HAYEK AS A CONSERVATIVE LIBERAL 16 4 THE CONSERVATIVE CRITICS: OAKESHOTT AND SCRUTON 20 5 IS THE FREE MARKET UNINSPIRING? 26 6 DOES THE FREE MARKET ERODE MORAL VALUES? 31 Hannes Holmsteinn Gissurarson 7 DOES THE FREE MARKET CREATE EXCESSIVE EXPECTATIONS? 36 8 IS DISTRIBUTION BY CHOICE MORALLY UNACCEPTABLE? 44 Born in 1953, he holds a D.Phil. in Politics from Oxford University and is Professor of Politics at the University 9 IS THE FREE MARKET SELF-DEFEATING? 50 of Iceland. The author of more than a dozen books on 10 DOES THE FREE MARKET ENCOURAGE VULGARITY? 57 political philosophy, history and current affairs, he is the research director of RNH, the Icelandic Research Centre for 11 CONCLUSIONS 62 Innovation and Economic Growth. New Direction - The Foundation for European Reform www.europeanreform.org @europeanreform Why Conservatives Should Support the Free Market Hannes H. Gissurarson 1 INTRODUCTION here are many ways of classifying political which in the nineteenth century solidified into a positions, ideologies and parties.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservative Mood
    THE CONSERVATIVE MOOD C. Wright Mills In the material prosperity of post-war America, as crack- pot realism has triumphed in practical affairs, all sorts of writers, from a rather confused variety of viewpoints, have been groping for a conservative ideology. They have not found it, and they have not managed to create it. What they have found is an absence of mind in politics, and what they have man- aged to create is a mood. The psychological heart of this mood is a feeling of powerlessness—but with the old edge taken off, for it is a mood of acceptance and of a relaxa- tion of the political will. The intellectual core of the groping for conservatism is a giving up of the central goal of the secular impulse in the West: the control through reason of man's fate. It is this goal that has lent continuity to the humanist tradition, re-discovered in the Renaissance, and so strong in nineteenth century American experience. It is this goal that has been the major im- pulse of classic liberalism and of classic socialism. The groping for conservative ideas, which signifies the weakening of this impulse, involves the search for tradition rather than reason as guide; the search for some natural aristocracy as an anchor point of tradition and a model of character. Sooner or later, those who would give up this im- pulse must take up the neo-Burkeian defense of irrationality, for that is, in fact, the only possible core of a genuinely conservative ideology. And it is not possible, I believe, to establish such an ideology in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • The Collapse of the Harm Principle
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 90 Article 3 Issue 1 Fall Fall 1999 The olC lapse of the Harm Principle Bernard E. Harcourt Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Bernard E. Harcourt, The oC llapse of the Harm Principle, 90 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 109 (1999-2000) This Criminal Law is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4169/99/9001-0109 THE JOURNALOF CRIMINALLAW & CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 90, No. I Cop)right 0 1999 by Northwestern University, School of Law Piinted in USA. THE COLLAPSE OF THE HARM PRINCIPLE BERNARD E. HARCOURT I. INTRODUCTION In November 1998, fourteen neighborhoods in Chicago voted to shut down their liquor stores, bars, and lounges, and four more neighborhoods voted to close down specific taverns. Three additional liquor establishments were voted shut in Feb- ruary 1999. Along with the fourteen other neighborhoods that passed dry votes in 1996 and those that went dry right after Pro- hibition, to date more than 15% of Chicago has voted itself dry. The closures affect alcohol-related businesses, like liquor stores and bars, but do not restrict drinking in the privacy of one's hoifie. The legal mechanism is an arcane 1933 "vote yourself dry" law, enacted at the time of the repeal of Prohibition, and amended by the state legislature in 1995.' Chicago's temperance movement reflects a fascinating de- velopment in the legal enforcement of morality.
    [Show full text]
  • Socialism, the IWW, and Communism on the Cuyuna Iron Range, 1912-1933 by John Anthony Byczynski
    Rethinking Radicalism: Socialism, the IWW, and Communism on the Cuyuna Iron Range, 1912-1933 By John Anthony Byczynski n 1933, the twenty-five-year-old mayor of Crosby, Minnesota, the largest city on the Cuyuna Iron Range, Emil Nygard, was on a nationwide tour, the highlight of which was a speech at Web- ster IHall in New York City. On October 19, 1933, the young mayor declared in front of a packed house: “We should not think that it is im- possible to elect Communists to office in the United States of America.” Many in Crosby Minnesota thought “I could not be elected as a Com- munist Mayor. But because I led them in militant demonstrations . a Communist Mayor was elected.” Nygard continued: “In the city of Crosby the working men have begun to realize that they cannot any lon- ger depend on demagogues,” the working-class understood “they must support the Communist Party.” The crowd cheered its approval when Nygard added: “They are beginning to realize also that the Communist Party will not betray the working class!”1 If one looks at miners of the region with only a passing glance, Ny- gard’s election, and a series of Progressive Era strikes led by socialists and a radical union, the Industrial Workers of the World, might lead one to conclude, as one historian suggests of Nygard’s election, that it is was “the culmination of years of radical activity on the iron range.”2 How- ever, connections with the Socialist Party and the IWW give the false impression that the miners were more radical than they really were.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reception of John Stuart Mill in France Concerning Mill’S on Representative Government
    The Reception of John Stuart Mill in France Concerning Mill’s On Representative Government Vincent GUILLIN and Djamel SOUAFA How did the thought of John Stuart Mill cross the English Channel? Vincent Guillin and Djamel Souafa analyze the reception of Considerations on Representative Government in Second Empire France and show why it is interesting to reconsider Mill’s theory of democratic government today. Nearly twenty years ago, in a preface to a new edition of On Liberty, Pierre Bouretz lamented the “unfathomable ignorance” of John Stuart Mill’s work in France.1 Some day there really ought to be a serious historical and philosophical study of the various reasons for the virtually total absence of references to Mill in France until quite recently2—an absence that is all the more intriguing because, as Bouretz rightly points out, Mill’s work was known and discussed by French philosophers, psychologists, economists, sociologists, and political scientists at least until the 1920s, but all this has been “forgotten.”3 It should be noted, however, that the situation has improved considerably since the 1990s: although Mill’s work is still not central to contemporary debates in France, some of his writing have once again become accessible to a broad audience. The most recent development in this area is the publication of Patrick Savidan’s elegant and precise translation of Mill’s Considerations on Representative Government,4 which has 1 John Stuart Mill, De la liberté, trans. C. Dupont-White, revised by L. Lenglet, preface by Pierre Bouretz, Paris, Gallimard, 1990, p. 13. 2 A notable exception is Ruwen Ogien, who frequently refers to Mill’s moral liberalism in his work, especially L’Éthique aujourd’hui.
    [Show full text]
  • View Latest Version Here. SOCIALISM
    This transcript was exported on Apr 27, 2019 - view latest version here. Speaker 1: Major funds for BackStory is provided by an anonymous donor, the National Endowment for the Humanities, and the Joseph and Robert Cornell Memorial Foundation. Brian Balogh: From Virginia Humanities, this is BackStory. Brian Balogh: Welcome to BackStory, the show that explains the history behind today's headlines. I'm Brian Balogh. Nathan Connolly: And, I'm Nathan Connolly. If you're new to the podcast, we're all historians, and each week, along with our colleagues, Joanne Freeman and Ed Ayers, we explore the history of one topic that's been in the news. Brian Balogh: We're going to start today's show just outside of Chicago in the town of Pullman. Founded in 1880 by George Pullman, owner of the Pullman Car Company, the town was developed exclusively for laborers. It was an experiment in social reform providing workers a community free from poverty and crime. But, according to historian Nicholas Salvatore, Pullman's motivations were, in reality, much less altruistic. Nicholas S.: That model town was actually a way of controlling the workforce, because if the worker ... Let's say a family is there with a husband, wife, and two kids, and if the husband was the one who was working on the line, if he raised any issues about conditions, wages, dissent concerning the way the company was run, et cetera, et cetera, they get thrown out. And, it happened all the time. Brian Balogh: In 1893, the railroad industry was hit hard by a financial panic.
    [Show full text]