Subsurface Structures and Characterization of the Silali Geothermal System, Kenya Rift

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Subsurface Structures and Characterization of the Silali Geothermal System, Kenya Rift UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY MSc IN GEOLOGY nS SUBSURFACE STRUCTURES AND CHARACTERIZATION OF THE SILALI GEOTHERMAL SYSTEM, KENYA RIFT. / r By Kangogo Deflorah Jerobon Reg No: 156/77008/09 University of NAIROBI Library 0439129 8 A dissertation submitted to the University of Nairobi in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Geology (Applied Geophysics). 2011 f DECLARATION I certify that although I may have conferred with others in preparing for this assignment, and drawn upon a range of sources cited in this work, the content of this thesis report is my original work and has not been presented for a degree in any other university or any other award. Signature _________ Date: Deflorah Kangogo 1 confirm that the candidate under our supervision has undertaken the work in this dissertation report. Prof. Justus Barongo Department of Geology, University of Nairobi. ABSTRACT Electrical resistivity methods are widely applied in geothermal exploration and are the cheapest means of acquiring subsurface data. Further detailed surveys like exploratory drilling which is cost intensive in an area under study is always based on accurate surface exploration results. Several exploration methods are applicable in geophysical prospecting of geothermal resources; however, this study focuses mainly on application of electromagnetic methods namely Transient Electromagnetic (TEM) and Magnetotelluric (MT). During the detailed exploration surveys of Silali geothermal prospect situated in the floor of the Northern Kenya rift, MT and TEM methods were applied. The survey was to map out the subsurface resistivity, which is then interpreted so as to provide information such as fluid filled fractures, the reservoir and the heat source. Joint one dimensional (1-D) inversions of MT and TEM data were done so as to correct for static shift in MT soundings. Results of the joint 1-D inversion of MT and TEM data revealed four main resistivity zones; A shallow high resistivity zone (> 100 ftm) to about 300 m below the surface which is as a result of unaltered rocks, 2) An intermediate low resistivity zone (10 f2m) to depths of about I km which is as a result of low temperature hydrothermal alteration minerals, 3) A deeper high resistivity (> 50 Om), up to 3-4 km depth indicating high temperature minerals occurring at depth. The shallow boundary between an upper, low resistive layer and the underlying intermediate resistivity zone at depths of 800-3500 m appears to mark the change in clay mineralogy from low grade alteration mineralogy represented by smectite to high grade alteration mineralogy represented by chlorite, epidote and actinolite, which is interpreted as the geothermal reservoir zone of this study area, and 4) a deeper low resistivity region, at a depth of about 5000 m below sea level is inferred to be magmatic material or intrusion i.e., the heat source of this study area. The resultant 2-D resistivity models showed significant variations in the resistivity distribution both vertically and horizontally on all profiles indicating major structural controls of the geothermal system. This study concludes that a geothermal resource exists in Silali caldera and the nearly vertical conductors in the resistive zones are fluid filled fracture systems/faults and are best targets for exploratory drilling. It is, therefore, recommended that deep exploration wells be drilled within the caldera floor and outside the caldera to the east to further confirm the nature and potential of the resource at Silali. n ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I wish to express my gratitude to my God for giving me health and insights throughout the project period. Thanks to entire University of Nairobi fraternity more so to my supervisor Professor Justus Barongo for guiding me through the process by constructive criticism and advice. Many thanks go to Mr. James Wambugu Manager, Resource Development, Geothermal Development Company (GDC) and Mr. John Lagat, Chief Geologist, GDC for ensuring success in this research. Many thanks go to Charles Muturia, Senior Geophysicist, GDC for training me on the data collection, processing, analysis and interpretation ensuring overall success in my project objectives. I am also greatly indebted to the staff at the University of Nairobi, Department of Geology and GDC for contributing in their own unique ways towards this project. Finally many thanks to my parents Mr. and Mrs. Kegei for guiding me and always installing hope and patience in my academic life. m t a b l e o f c o n t e n t s declaration .............................................................................................................................. ABSTRACT...................................................................................................................................... i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT..............................................................................................................ii List of Figures.................................................................................................................................vi List of Tables................ vii List of Plates...................................................................................................................................vii Acronyms......................................................................................................................................... i> CHAPTER O NE............................................................................................................................... 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................1 1.1 Problem statement..................................................................................................................3 1.2 Research motivation...............................................................................................................5 1.3 Aim and objectives................................................................................................................. 5 1.3.1 Specific objectives...............................................................................................................5 1.3.2 Justification and significance.............................................................................................. 5 1.4 Literature review..................................................................................................................... 6 1.4.1 Seismology...........................................................................................................................7 1.4.2 Gravity and ground magnetics........................................................................................... 8 1.5 Application of resistivity methods in geothermal exploration........................................ 12 1.6 The role of electrical resistivity..........................................................................................12 1.7 Resistivity of rocks............................................................................... ;............................. 14 1.8 Salinity of water................................................................................................................... 15 1.9 Temperature...........................................................................................................................16 1.10 Pressure................................................................................................................................ 17 1.11 Porosity and permeability of a rock................................................................................. 18 1.12 Water-rock interaction and alteration................................................................................19 CHAPTER TWO.............................................................................................................................21 2.0 REGIONAL AND LOCAL SETTING OF THE STUDY AREA....................................... 21 2.1 Introduction...........................................................................................................................21 2.2 Location.................................................................................................................................23 2.3 Physiography and drainage.................................................................................................. 23 2.3.1 Physiography....................................................,.......*.............. ......'................................ 23 2.3.2 Drainage........................................................................................................................... 23 2.4 Topography............................................................................................................................25 2.5 Climate...................................................................................................................................25 2.6 Vegetation..............................................................................................................................25 2.7 Land use and land resources................................................................................................ 26 2.8 Geology of the study area.................................................................................................. 26 2.8.1 Structural setting of Silali................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • An Electrical Resistivity Study of the Area Between Mt. Suswa and The
    AN ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY STUDY OF THE AREA BETWEEN MT. SUSWA AND * M THE OLKARIA GEOTHERMAL FIELD, KENYA STEPHEN ALUMASA ONACONACHA IIS TUF.sis n\sS rREEN e e n ACCEPTED m ^ e i t e d ^ fFOE HE DECREE of nd A COt'V M&vA7 BE PLACED IN 'TH& njivk.RSITY LIBRARY. A thesis submitted in accordance with the requirement for partial fulfillment of the V Degree of Master of Science DEPT. OF GEOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI 1989 DECLARATION jhis is my original work and has not b e e n submitted for a degree in any other university S . A . ONACHA The thesis has been submitted for examination with our Knowledge as University Supervisors: /] Mr. E. DINDI ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank my supervisors Dr. M.P. Tole and Mr. E. Dindi for their invaluable help and advice during the course of ray studies. I am grateful to the staff of the Ministry of Energy especially Mr. Kinyariro and Mr. Kilele for their tremendous help during the data acquisition. I also wish to express my appreciation of the University of Nairobi for their MSc Scholarship during my study. I am grateful to the British Council for their fellowship that enabled me to carry out data analysis at the University of Edinburgh. A ^ Finally, I wish to thank the members of my family for their love and understanding during my studies. ABSTRACT The D. C. electrical resistivity study of Suswa-Olkaria region was carried out from July 1987 to November, 1988. The main objective was to evaluate the sub-surface geoelectric structure with a view to determining layers that might be associated with geothermal fluid migrations.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenyan Stone Age: the Louis Leakey Collection
    World Archaeology at the Pitt Rivers Museum: A Characterization edited by Dan Hicks and Alice Stevenson, Archaeopress 2013, pages 35-21 3 Kenyan Stone Age: the Louis Leakey Collection Ceri Shipton Access 3.1 Introduction Louis Seymour Bazett Leakey is considered to be the founding father of palaeoanthropology, and his donation of some 6,747 artefacts from several Kenyan sites to the Pitt Rivers Museum (PRM) make his one of the largest collections in the Museum. Leakey was passionate aboutopen human evolution and Africa, and was able to prove that the deep roots of human ancestry lay in his native east Africa. At Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania he excavated an extraordinary sequence of Pleistocene human evolution, discovering several hominin species and naming the earliest known human culture: the Oldowan. At Olorgesailie, Kenya, he excavated an Acheulean site that is still influential in our understanding of Lower Pleistocene human behaviour. On Rusinga Island in Lake Victoria, Kenya he found the Miocene ape ancestor Proconsul. He obtained funding to establish three of the most influential primatologists in their field, dubbed Leakey’s ‘ape women’; Jane Goodall, Dian Fossey and Birute Galdikas, who pioneered the study of chimpanzee, gorilla and orangutan behaviour respectively. His second wife Mary Leakey, whom he first hired as an artefact illustrator, went on to be a great researcher in her own right, surpassing Louis’ work with her own excavations at Olduvai Gorge. Mary and Louis’ son Richard followed his parents’ career path initially, discovering many of the most important hominin fossils including KNM WT 15000 (the Nariokotome boy, a near complete Homo ergaster skeleton), KNM WT 17000 (the type specimen for Paranthropus aethiopicus), and KNM ER 1470 (the type specimen for Homo rudolfensis with an extremely well preserved Archaeopressendocranium).
    [Show full text]
  • Iv Supplementary Investigation on Environmental and Social Consideration
    Project for Reviewing GDC’s Geothermal Development Strategy in Kenya Final Report IV SUPPLEMENTARY INVESTIGATION ON ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL CONSIDERATION The JICA team performed an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), having the same level of Initial Environmental Examination (IEE), based on existing information, data and site surveys. This EIA included literature review on environmental and social consideration, and site survey and interview of local communities regarding the direct use of geothermal resources. Existing document review was performed during Phase I and site survey and other activities were performed during Phase II and later. The objective of this investigation was collecting and summarizing basic information in order to develop a detailed investigation plan for environmental and social consideration which will be needed during the implementation period of the GDC master plan as a loan assistance project. IV-1 Literature Review on Environmental and Social Assessment IV-1.1 National policies and laws related to environmental and social assessment EIA related Kenyan policy and domestic plan The key legal instruments which provide the framework for environmental protection and management in Kenya include: i. Constitution of Kenya ii. Kenya Vision 2030, Session Paper No. 6 of 1999 on Environment and Development iii. Environmental Management and Coordination Act (EMCA) of 1999; Amended in 2015 Relevant laws and agencies on environmental and social assessment The EMCA is the law for environmental conservation and regulation in Kenya. It stipulates the environmental impact assessment (EIA) procedure and implementation in the country. EMCA’s main objective is to provide a legal framework that would incorporate environmental considerations in the pursuit of economic and social development.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Update Report for Kenya 2010–2015
    Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2015 Melbourne, Australia, 19-25 April 2015 Country Update Report for Kenya 2010-2014 Peter Omenda and Silas Simiyu Geothermal Development Company, P. O. Box 100746, Nairobi 00101, Kenya [email protected] Keywords: Geothermal, Kenya rift, Country update. ABSTRACT Geothermal resources in Kenya have been under development since 1950’s and the current installed capacity stands at 573 MWe against total potential of about 10,000 MWe. All the high temperature prospects are located within the Kenya Rift Valley where they are closely associated with Quaternary volcanoes. Olkaria geothermal field is so far the largest producing site with current installed capacity of 573 MWe from five power plants owned by Kenya Electricity Generating Company (KenGen) (463 MWe) and Orpower4 (110 MWe). 10 MWt is being utilized to heat greenhouses and fumigate soils at the Oserian flower farm. The Oserian flower farm also has 4 MWe installed for own use. Power generation at the Eburru geothermal field stands at 2.5 MWe from a pilot plant. Development of geothermal resources in Kenya is currently being fast tracked with 280 MWe commissioned in September and October 2014. Production drilling for the additional 560 MWe power plants to be developed under PPP arrangement between KenGen and private sector is ongoing. The Geothermal Development Company (GDC) is currently undertaking production drilling at the Menengai geothermal field for 105 MWe power developments to be commissioned in 2015. Detailed exploration has been undertaken in Suswa, Longonot, Baringo, Korosi, Paka and Silali geothermal prospects and exploration drilling is expected to commence in year 2015 in Baringo – Silali geothermal area.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of Silali Basin As an Extra-Terrestrial Impact Crater (ETIC) Using Remote Sensing
    Journal of Environment and Earth Science www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-3216 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0948 (Online) Vol.6, No.2, 2016 Investigation of Silali Basin as an Extra-Terrestrial Impact Crater (ETIC) Using Remote Sensing Kipkiror Loice Jepkemboi 1*, Prof. Ucakuwun Elijah 2 & Prof. Fatuma Daudi 2 1 School of Arts and Social Science, University of Kabianga, P.O. Box 2030-20200, Kericho, Kenya 2 School of Environmental Studies, University of Eldoret, P.O. Box 1125-30100, Eldoret, Kenya Our gratitude goes to the University of Kabianga for partially funding this research study, besides keeping a track of it Abstract For years, extra-terrestrial impact cratering was esoteric. However, impacts have become very important, mainly because they have been identified as the likely immediate cause of dinosaur extinction. Impact cratering by extra-terrestrial bodies including asteroids comets and meteorites is an important geologic process, not only for the minerals that it forms, but also because of the knowledge that it is dangerous to mankind and life on earth. There is also the fact that extra-terrestrial impact crater building is a continuous process that may be going on even this very minute, somewhere in the universe. Consequently, the earth, just like other members of the solar system is targeted by extra-terrestrial falling objects. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of impact cratering on Kenya’s environment, with focus on Silali basin. Silali basin is a depression that is found to the north of Lake Baringo; around Kapedo town. It is suspected to be an Extra –Terrestrial Impact Crater (ETIC).
    [Show full text]
  • Geophysical and Hydrogeological Investigation Report
    GEOPHYSICAL AND HYDROGEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT St Peters Catholic Church- Upendo in Kangawa, P.O. Box 230, Molo. Through The Catholic Diocese of Nakuru, through the Nakuru Defluoridation Co. Ltd P.O. Box 2943 - 20100 Nakuru Plot LR No.; …………………… Kangawa-Upendo Village, Kangawa Sub-Location, Kuresoi North Location, Mau Summit Division, Molo Sub-County, Nakuru County. Topo Sheet No.; 118/2 CONSULTANT: Samuel Munyiri, BSc, MSc. (Hons) R. Geol. (Registered Hydrogeologist; Licence No. WD/WP/254) P.O. Box 798-10101, Karatina. Cell-phone: 0723 623 766 E-mail: [email protected] Signed:_________________________________ Date:___________________________________ June, 2018 Hydrogeological and Geophysical Report St. Peters Upendo Catholic Church EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction This report presents the findings of a geophysical and hydro-geological assessment carried out for St Peters Upendo Catholic Church-Kangawa on their 2 Acre parcel of land located in Kangawa Village, Kangawa Sub-Location, Kuresoi North Location and Mau Summit Division in Molo Sub- County of Nakuru County. The farm is located off the Molo-Londiani tarmac road section – at a distance of about 8km from Molo Town on the right hand side of this main road. The land can be accessed at the Kangawa Primary School junction and is about 1.8km west of this junction along a dry weather road. Water Demand and Use Kangawa-Upendo community is not served by any source of portable piped water, which would imply a near absence water supply on the client’s land. Apart from private boreholes and shallow wells in the area, there is no other feasible water supply. The community therefore relies on shallow wells, which have contaminated water due to percolation of fecal material from pit latrines.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology Natvasha Area
    Report No. 55 GOVERNMENT OF KENYA* MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF KENYA GEOLOGY OF THE NATVASHA AREA EXPLANATION OF DEGREE SHEET 43 S.W. (with coloured geological map) by A. O. THOMPSON M.Sc. and R. G. DODSON M.Sc. Geologists Fifteen Shillings - 1963 Scanned from original by ISRIC - World Soil Information, as ICSU World Data Centre for Soils. The purpose is to make a safe depository for endangered documents and to make the accrued information available for consultation, following Fair Use Guidelines. Every effort is taken to respect Copyright of the materials within the archives where the identification of the Copyright holder is clear and, where feasible, to contact the originators. For questions please contact soil.isric(a>wur.nl indicating the item reference number concerned. ISRIC LIBRARY ü£. 6Va^ [ GEOLOGY Wageningen, The Netherlands | OF THE EXPLANATION OF DEGREE SHEET 43 S.W. (with coloured geological map) by A. O. THOMPSON M.Sc. and R. G. DODSON M.Sc. Geologists FOREWORD Previous to the undertaking of modern geological surveys the Naivasha area, in the south-central part of Kenya Rift Valley, was probably the best known part of the Colony from the geological point of view. This resulted partly from ease of access, as from the earliest days the area was crossed by commonly used routes of com­ munication, and partly from the presence of lakes, which in Pleistocene times were much larger and made the country an ideal habitat for Prehistoric Man and animals that have left their traces behind them in the beds that were then deposited.
    [Show full text]
  • Simon Mang'erere Onywere
    Onywere Summer School 2005 Morphological Structure and the Anthropogenic Dynamics in the Lake Naivasha Drainage Basin and its Implications to Water Flows Simon Mang’erere Onywere Department of Environmental Planning and Management, Kenyatta University P.O. Box 43844 Nairobi 00100, Kenya E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Throughout its length, the Kenyan Rift Valley is characterized by Quaternary volcanoes. At Lake Naivasha drainage basin, the Eburru (2830m) and Olkaria (2434m) volcanic complexes and Kipipiri (3349m), Il Kinangop (3906m) and Longonot (2777m) volcanoes mark the terrain. Remote sensing data and field survey were used to make morphostructural maps and to determine the structural control and the land use impacts on the drainage systems in the basin. Lake Naivasha is located at the southern part of the highest part of Kenya’s Rift Valley floor in a trough marked to the south and north by Quaternary normal faults and extensional fractures striking in a N18°W direction. The structure of the rift floor influences the axial geometry and the surface process. Simiyu and Keller (2001) interpret the rift floor structure as due to thickening related to the pre-rift crustal type and modification by magmatic processes. The rift marginal escarpments of Sattima and Mau form the main watershed areas. From the marginal escarpments the Rift Valley is formed by a series of down-stepped fault scraps. These influence the nature of the soils and the rainfall regime. The drainage is also influenced by the fault trends. At the Malewa fault line for example the drainage is south-easterly influenced by the trend of the Malewa fault line (Thompson and Dodson, 1963).
    [Show full text]
  • Lectures on Geothermal in Kenya and Africa
    GEOTHERMAL TRAINING PROGRAMME Reports 2005 Orkustofnun, Grensásvegur 9, Number 4 IS-108 Reykjavík, Iceland LECTURES ON GEOTHERMAL IN KENYA AND AFRICA Martin N. Mwangi (lecturer and co-ordinator) Kenya Electricity Generating Co., Ltd. - KenGen Olkaria Geothermal Project P.O. Box 785 Naivasha KENYA Lectures on geothermal energy given in September 2005 United Nations University, Geothermal Training Programme Reykjavík, Iceland Published in April 2006 ISBN - 9979-68-187-X Mwangi ii Lectures PREFACE Kenya is the leading African country in geothermal exploration and development. Electricity generation from geothermal started in 1981 at the Olkaria I power station. In 2005 the installed generation capacity is 129 MWe, and the electricity production constitutes 11% of the total electricity production in the country. There is a plan to increase the generation capacity by 576 MWe by 2026. Behind all this is the Kenya Electricity Generating Company Ltd. (KenGen) and their very able staff. The UNU Visiting Lecturer 2005 was Mr. Martin N. Mwangi, Chief Manager of KenGen´s Olkaria Geothermal Project, who is one of the leading geothermal experts of Africa. He received training in geophysical exploration as UNU Fellow at the UNU-GTP in 1982. With him came a geochemist (Mr. Zaccheus Muna) and a drilling engineer (Mr. Joseph Ng´ang´a). Including the trio from that vintage year in geothermal studies, a total of 37 Kenyans have completed the six months specialized training at the UNU-GTP. Of these, 33 have come from KenGen. Martin gave an excellent summary of geothermal work in Kenya. In the first lecture (co-authored by Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • HYDROCHEMISTRY of OLKARIA and EBURRU Geotilermal Fields, KENYAN RIFT VALLEY
    Repon 2, 1991 HYDROCHEMISTRY OF OLKARIA AND EBURRU GEOTIlERMAL FIElDS, KENYAN RIFT VALLEY Musa Kipchirchir Arusei, UNU Geothermal Training Programme, Orkustofnun - National Energy Authority, Grensasvegur 9, 108 Reykjavik, ICElAND. Permanent address: Olkaria Geothermal Project, P.O. Box 785, Naivasha, KENYA 3 ABSTRACf The chemical composition of waters from cold and warm borehoies, springs, Lake Naivasha, River Morendati and geothermal waters from the Olkaria and Eburru fields is presented. The study of the chemistry of the waters has been used to suggest movement and processes affecting the groundwater in the Rift Valley. The study has shown that Lake Naivasha, which is the only fresh water lake in the Kenyan Rift Valley, recharges most of the nearby boreholes. The chemical characteristics of the geothermal waters in Olkaria and Eburru geothermal fields are similar. Eburru and Olkaria geothermal reservoirs get some of their recharge from the rift groundwater. The waters from some boreholes to the north of Eburru and Elementeita spring are outflows from Eburru geothermal field and there seems to be no other geothermal resource in the Elementeita area. The escarpment warm spring waters are shallow escarpment waters that have been heated by shallow hot rock, probably below the location of the springs. They may not be related to the geothennal systems at Olkaria and Eburru. Monitoring of water levels around the lake is recommended to determine the possible effect of geothermal exploitation at Olkaria on Lake Naivasha. Further work to estimate the outflow of water from the lake and inflow into it is also recommended. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT .........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Master Plan
    No. JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY (JICA) MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT (MOARD) THE STUDY ON THE INTEGRATED RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN THE BARINGO SEMI ARID LAND AREA (MARIGAT AND MUKUTANI DIVISIONS) IN THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA FINAL REPORT MASTER PLAN MARCH 2002 SANYU CONSULTANTS INC. AFA JR 02-65 Exchange Rate as of September 2001 US Dollar = 77.40 KShillings US Dollar = 118.80 JYen KShillings = 1.53 JYen PREFACE In response to the request from the Government of the Republic of Kenya, the Government of Japan decided to conduct a Master Plan Study on the Integrated Rural Development Project in the Baringo Semi Arid Land Area (Marigat and Mukutani Divisions) and entrusted the Study to the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). JICA sent to Kenya a study team headed by Mr. Seiji Takeuchi, Sanyu Consultants Inc., six times between August 1999 and December 2001. The Team held discussions with the officials concerned of the Government of the Republic of Kenya, and conducted field surveys at the Study Area. After the Team returned to Japan, further studies were made and the present report was prepared. I hope that this report will contribute to the promotion of the project and to the enhancement of friendly relation between our two countries. I wish to express my sincere appreciation to the officials concerned of the Government of the Republic of Kenya for their close cooperation extended to the Team. March 2002 Takao Kawakami President Japan International Cooperation Agency March 2002 Mr. Takao Kawakami President, Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) Tokyo, Japan Dear Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Suswa Area
    --- - Report No. 97 REPUBLIC OF KENYA I MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES t MINES AND GEOLOGICAL DEPARTMENTDEPARTMENT' \ GEOLOGY OF THE SUSWA AREA DEGREE SHEET 51, NW QUARTER (with coloured geological map) 1 by R.P. RANDEL, BA, FGS and R.W. JOHNSON, BSc, PhD, ARCS Geologists 1991 ~ - -- - ,~- ~ ;;I £3@ Government of Kenya, 1991 Published by the Mines & Geological Dept., P.().P.O. Box 30009, Nairobi, Kenya Produced in Kenya by the Editorial Section, Mines & Geological Dept., P.O. Box 30009, Nairobi, Kenya Printed by AMREF, P.O. Box 30125, Nairobi, Kenya I I Cataloguing-in~publicationCataloguing-in-publication data: Geology Geology of [hethe Suswa area-“RP.area/R.P. Randel and R. W. Johnson.JohRson. - Nairobi, Kenya: Rep. 97, Mines & Geological Dept. 1991 . I Bibliography: p. 38 I Coloured geological map I ~ iSBNISBN 9966-875-04-2 I I I I ' I """1 . CONTENTS Pag‘ Preface ............................................................. .'. .. Pageiii Editors‘Editors' notenote. ........................................................ .iv Abstract.Abstract ............................................................ .. v\' I. Introduction.Introduction ......................................................... .. 1 II. Previous geological work.work ............................................. .. 3 III. Physiography.Physiography ........................................................ .. 6(3 IV.I V . Summary of geology.geology ................................................. .. 9Q V. Cainozoic volcanic and associated rocks ...........................
    [Show full text]