DOCSLIB.ORG

Flight to Quality, Flight to Liquidity, and the Pricing of Risk

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Flight to Quality, Flight to Liquidity, and the Pricing of Risk Flight to Quality, Flight to Liquidity, and the Pricing of Risk Dimitri Vayanos MIT and NBER February 2003 Introduction 1 INTRODUCTION Liquidity premia seem to vary substantially over time. • Clean experiments: • { T-notes vs. T-bills. (Amihud and Mendelson (1991), Ka- mara (1994), Strebulaev (2002)) { Off- vs. on-the run bonds. (Krishnamurthy (2002)) { Refcorp vs. government bonds. (Longstaff (2002)) { Municipal vs. government bonds. (Chalmers, Kadlec, and Mozumdar (2002)) Effects can be quite strong. • { Variation in spread equals 4-6 times average spread. { Variation in relative prices can be up to 15%. { Flight to liquidity. Effects could be stronger for other asset classes. • { Corporate bonds. { Emerging market bonds. { Stocks. Introduction 2 Why Do Liquidity Premia Vary? Liquidity premia seem to be high when • { Interest-rate volatility is high. (Kamara (1994)) { Consumer confidence is low. (Longstaff (2002)) { Money flows away from equity funds, into money market funds. (Longstaff (2002)) { Stock market goes down. (Chalmers, Kadlec, and Mozum- dar (2002)) Variation in liquidity premia seems to be correlated across mar- • kets. { On-the-run premium is correlated with commercial-paper spread. (Krishnamurthy (2002)) Introduction 3 Questions Questions: • { What is economic mechanism driving variation in liquidity premia? { How is risk associated to changes in liquidity premia priced? Answers could be important for understanding • { An important component of asset price volatility. { An important component of pricing of asset risk. (Espe- cially for illiquid assets.) Introduction 4 This Paper Proposes a theory of time-varying liquidity premia. • Explores its asset-pricing implications. • Dynamic multi-asset equilibrium model. • Introduction 5 Main Assumptions Transaction costs. Exogenous, constant over time, different across assets. • Illiquid assets High TC. • ≡ Time-variation in liquidity premia will not caused by TC. • { Seems realistic: Variation in bid-ask spreads is often small relative to that in liquidity premia. Off-the-run bonds. ∗ Refcorp bonds. (Longstaff (2002)) ∗ Introduction 6 Main Assumptions (cont'd) Stochastic volatility. Asset payoffs have stochastic volatility. • Volatility will drive liquidity premia. • Seems realistic. • { Empirical evidence. { Anecdotal evidence: Traders value liquidity more at times of \uncertainty." Delegated money management. Portfolio decisions are made by fund managers. • When return falls below a threshold, fund is liquidated. • High volatility High liquidation probability Short invest- • ) ) ment horizons High liquidity premia. ) Introduction 7 Results / Empirical Implications Liquidity premia ( price differentials between assets which are • ≡ identical except for TC) increase with volatility. { Flight to liquidity. Market's effective risk aversion ( expected return per unit of • ≡ variance) increases with volatility. { Flight to quality. { Risk aversion varies not because of stochastic utility func- tions, but because of concern of liquidation. Betas depend on volatility. • { Betas of illiquid assets increase with volatility. Correlations depend on volatility. • { Correlations between similar assets increase with volatility. Unconditional two-factor CAPM (factors = market, volatility) • does not price assets correctly. { Understates risk of illiquid assets. Implications for price of volatility factor. • Model 8 MODEL Infinite horizon, discrete time. Time between periods is h. • Assets. Riskless asset, return rh. r is exogenous. • N risky assets. • Volatility v evolves according to • t v = v + γ(v v )h + σ v hη : t+h t − t t t+h p Asset n pays dividend δ h. δ evolves according to • n;t n;t δ = δ +κ(δ δ )h+ v h (φ ζ + η + ξ ) : n;t+h n;t − n;t t n t+h n t+h n;t+h p { ζt+h: systematic shock, independent of ηt+h. { ξn;t+h: idiosyncratic shock. Supply S . • n Transaction costs per share . • n Price (average of bid and ask) p . • n;t Model 9 Fund Management and Liquidation Each investor \manages" a fund of size W . • t Performance-based liquidation: • { In each period, a fund can be \monitored" by its owners with probability µh. { Fund is liquidated if W W < Lph, for L > 0. t+h − t − Random liquidation: • { In each period, a fund can be liquidated with probability λh, regardless of performance. At liquidation: • { Investment in each asset is sold in the market. { Manager can find employment in a new fund, whose size is equal to old fund's liquidation value. Model 10 Fund Managers Infinitely lived, continuum, mass one. • Manager decides how much to allocate in each asset. • Exogenous management fee (aW + b)h. • t Exogenous withdrawal by fund's owners (aW^ + ^b)h. • t Assumptions: a > 0, a + a^ = r=(1 + rh). • Manager maximizes • 1 E exp ( αc βkh) : − − t+kh − Xk=0 Consumption is derived from fee. • Manager can save/borrow in riskless asset. • Equilibrium 11 EQUILIBRIUM Basic Properties Managers buy and hold the market portfolio. • Price of asset n is • 1 κh p = q (v ) + − (δ δ): n;t n t r + κ n;t − Value function of a manager is • exp [ A[W + zw + Z(v )]] ; − − t t t where A αa, z r=[(1 + rh)a], and w are manager's ≡ ≡ t private savings. When h goes to zero, functions q (v) and Z(v) can • f n gn=1;::;N be characterized by a system of N + 1 ODEs. { ODEs are derived from Bellman equation. { They are second order. Equilibrium 12 Preliminaries Notation: • { φ N S φ , M ≡ n=1 n n { N S , M ≡ Pn=1 n n { q (v) N S q (v), M ≡P n=1 n n { N S . M ≡ nP=1 n n Number ofPassets N becomes large, while N S stays fixed. • n=1 n { Sn goes to zero. P { Idiosyncratic shocks do not matter. No Performance-Based Liquidation 13 NO PERFORMANCE-BASED LIQUIDATION ODEs for q (v) and Z(v) have linear solution: • f n gn=1;::;N { q (v) = q q v. n n0 − n1 { q (v) = q q v. M M0 − M1 { Z(v) = Z0 + Z1v. Properties: • { qM1 > 0: Market goes down when volatility increases. { @qn0=@n < 0: Liquidity premia are positive. { @qn1=@n = 0: Liquidity premia are independent of volatil- ity. No Performance-Based Liquidation 14 CAPM ODE for q (v) can be written as • n Et(Rn;t+h) = ACovt(Rn;t+h; RM;t+h) + AZ0(vt)Covt(Rn;t+h; Rv;t+h) + [r + 2λ exp(2AM )] nh; where { Rn;t+h: excess return on asset n. { RM;t+h: excess return on market portfolio. { Rv;t+h: excess return on volatility portfolio. { Excess returns are per share, and between t and t + h. Conditional two-factor CAPM, adjusted for transaction costs. • Linear solution Z0(v ) = Z . • ) t 1 Taking expectations, we find • E(Rn;t+h) = ACov(Rn;t+h; RM;t+h) + AZ1Cov(Rn;t+h; Rv;t+h) + [r + 2λ exp(2AM )] nh; i.e., unconditional two-factor CAPM, adjusted for transaction costs. No Performance-Based Liquidation 15 Volatility Factor Recent research has considered a volatility/liquidity factor. • Pastor and Stambaugh (2001) • { Liquidity factor Price reversals. ≡ Acharya and Pedersen (2002) • { Liquidity factor Aggregate price impact. ≡ Liquidity factor: • { Negative risk premium. { Significant explanatory power. { In our model, aggregate price impact is proportional to volatility Volatility factor corresponds to PS-AP liquidity ) factor. Ang and Hodrick (2002) • { Volatility factor. No Performance-Based Liquidation 16 Volatility Risk Premium Z > 0 Volatility factor carries positive risk premium. • 1 ) { Holding market beta constant, investors prefer assets that pay off when volatility is low. { Opposite to empirical findings. Intuition: • { Holding wealth constant, investors are better off at times of high volatility. Performance-Based Liquidation 17 PERFORMANCE-BASED LIQUIDATION Liquidation condition is W W < Lph. • t+h − t − Probability of this event depends on tails of ζ and η . • t+h t+h Normal distribution is not tractable. • Power laws are, however, very tractable. • Performance-Based Liquidation 18 Power Laws Assume that lower tail of ζ and upper tail of η follow • t+h t+h power laws with exponent b, i.e., c Prob(ζ < y) ζ ; t+h − ∼ yb c Prob(η > y) η : t+h ∼ yb b = 2: Liquidation probability is • 2 2 vt φM M π(v ) = c + c + q0 (v )σ : t L2 ζ (r + κ)2 η r + κ M t " # Linear in vt. b = 4: Liquidation probability is • 2 4 4 vt φM M π(v ) = c + c + q0 (v )σ : t L4 ζ (r + κ)4 η r + κ M t " # Quadratic in vt. Equations are valid for L large relative to v . • t Performance-Based Liquidation 19 Asset Pricing Expected returns are given by • Et(Rn;t+h) = ACovt(Rn;t+h; RM;t+h) + AZ0(vt)Covt(Rn;t+h; Rv;t+h) @π(v ; x) exp(2A ) 1 +µ t M − h @x A n x=S + [r + 2 [λ + µπ(vt)] exp(2AM )] nh: Third term is \liquidation" risk premium. • Linear Liquidation Probability 20 LINEAR LIQUIDATION PROBABILITY Solution is still linear. • { q (v) = q q v n n0 − n1 { q (v) = q q v M M0 − M1 { Z(v) = Z0 + Z1v. New property: • { @qn1=@n > 0: Liquidity premia increase with volatility. Linear Liquidation Probability 21 CAPM Liquidation risk premium depends on covariance between asset • n, and market and volatility portfolios. Can incorporate liquidation risk premium into CAPM risk • ) premium. Conditional two-factor CAPM, with modified risk-aversion • ) coefficients: Et(Rn;t+h) = AM (vt)Covt(Rn;t+h; RM;t+h) +Av(vt)Covt(Rn;t+h; Rv;t+h) + [r + 2 [λ + µπ(vt)] exp(2AM )] nh: In linear case, modified risk-aversion coefficients A (v ) and • M t Av(vt) are constants. Taking expectations, we can derive unconditional two-factor • ) CAPM. Linear Liquidation Probability 22 Risk-Aversion Coefficients For market portfolio: • µ exp(2A ) 1 A A + 2 c M − : M ≡ L2 ζ A { Greater than without performance-based liquidation. For volatility portfolio: • µ exp(2A ) 1 A AZ +2 (c c ) q M M − : v ≡ 1 L2 ζ − η M1 − σ(r + κ) A { Can become negative if cη > cζ (volatility tails fatter than dividend tails).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • “Dividend Policy and Share Price Volatility”
    “Dividend policy and share price volatility” Sew Eng Hooi AUTHORS Mohamed Albaity Ahmad Ibn Ibrahimy Sew Eng Hooi, Mohamed Albaity and Ahmad Ibn Ibrahimy (2015). Dividend ARTICLE INFO policy and share price volatility. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 12(1-1), 226-234 RELEASED ON Tuesday, 07 April 2015 JOURNAL "Investment Management and Financial Innovations" FOUNDER LLC “Consulting Publishing Company “Business Perspectives” NUMBER OF REFERENCES NUMBER OF FIGURES NUMBER OF TABLES 0 0 0 © The author(s) 2021. This publication is an open access article. businessperspectives.org Investment Management and Financial Innovations, Volume 12, Issue 1, 2015 Sew Eng Hooi (Malaysia), Mohamed Albaity (Malaysia), Ahmad Ibn Ibrahimy (Malaysia) Dividend policy and share price volatility Abstract The objective of this study is to examine the relationship between dividend policy and share price volatility in the Malaysian market. A sample of 319 companies from Kuala Lumpur stock exchange were studied to find the relationship between stock price volatility and dividend policy instruments. Dividend yield and dividend payout were found to be negatively related to share price volatility and were statistically significant. Firm size and share price were negatively related. Positive and statistically significant relationships between earning volatility and long term debt to price volatility were identified as hypothesized. However, there was no significant relationship found between growth in assets and price volatility in the Malaysian market. Keywords: dividend policy, share price volatility, dividend yield, dividend payout. JEL Classification: G10, G12, G14. Introduction (Wang and Chang, 2011). However, difference in tax structures (Ho, 2003; Ince and Owers, 2012), growth Dividend policy is always one of the main factors and development (Bulan et al., 2007; Elsady et al., that an investor will focus on when determining 2012), governmental policies (Belke and Polleit, 2006) their investment strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Putting Volatility to Work
    Wh o ’ s afraid of volatility? Not anyone who wants a true edge in his or her trad i n g , th a t ’ s for sure. Get a handle on the essential concepts and learn how to improve your trading with pr actical volatility analysis and trading techniques. 2 www.activetradermag.com • April 2001 • ACTIVE TRADER TRADING Strategies BY RAVI KANT JAIN olatility is both the boon and bane of all traders — The result corresponds closely to the percentage price you can’t live with it and you can’t really trade change of the stock. without it. Most of us have an idea of what volatility is. We usually 2. Calculate the average day-to-day changes over a certain thinkV of “choppy” markets and wide price swings when the period. Add together all the changes for a given period (n) and topic of volatility arises. These basic concepts are accurate, but calculate an average for them (Rm): they also lack nuance. Volatility is simply a measure of the degree of price move- Rt ment in a stock, futures contract or any other market. What’s n necessary for traders is to be able to bridge the gap between the Rm = simple concepts mentioned above and the sometimes confus- n ing mathematics often used to define and describe volatility. 3. Find out how far prices vary from the average calculated But by understanding certain volatility measures, any trad- in Step 2. The historical volatility (HV) is the “average vari- er — options or otherwise — can learn to make practical use of ance” from the mean (the “standard deviation”), and is esti- volatility analysis and volatility-based strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • FX Effects: Currency Considerations for Multi-Asset Portfolios
    Investment Research FX Effects: Currency Considerations for Multi-Asset Portfolios Juan Mier, CFA, Vice President, Portfolio Analyst The impact of currency hedging for global portfolios has been debated extensively. Interest on this topic would appear to loosely coincide with extended periods of strength in a given currency that can tempt investors to evaluate hedging with hindsight. The data studied show performance enhancement through hedging is not consistent. From the viewpoint of developed markets currencies—equity, fixed income, and simple multi-asset combinations— performance leadership from being hedged or unhedged alternates and can persist for long periods. In this paper we take an approach from a risk viewpoint (i.e., can hedging lead to lower volatility or be some kind of risk control?) as this is central for outcome-oriented asset allocators. 2 “The cognitive bias of hindsight is The Debate on FX Hedging in Global followed by the emotion of regret. Portfolios Is Not New A study from the 1990s2 summarizes theoretical and empirical Some portfolio managers hedge papers up to that point. The solutions reviewed spanned those 50% of the currency exposure of advocating hedging all FX exposures—due to the belief of zero expected returns from currencies—to those advocating no their portfolio to ward off the pain of hedging—due to mean reversion in the medium-to-long term— regret, since a 50% hedge is sure to and lastly those that proposed something in between—a range of values for a “universal” hedge ratio. Later on, in the mid-2000s make them 50% right.” the aptly titled Hedging Currencies with Hindsight and Regret 3 —Hedging Currencies with Hindsight and Regret, took a behavioral approach to describe the difficulty and behav- Statman (2005) ioral biases many investors face when incorporating currency hedges into their asset allocation.
    [Show full text]
  • Modelling Australian Dollar Volatility at Multiple Horizons with High-Frequency Data
    risks Article Modelling Australian Dollar Volatility at Multiple Horizons with High-Frequency Data Long Hai Vo 1,2 and Duc Hong Vo 3,* 1 Economics Department, Business School, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia; [email protected] 2 Faculty of Finance, Banking and Business Administration, Quy Nhon University, Binh Dinh 560000, Vietnam 3 Business and Economics Research Group, Ho Chi Minh City Open University, Ho Chi Minh City 7000, Vietnam * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 1 July 2020; Accepted: 17 August 2020; Published: 26 August 2020 Abstract: Long-range dependency of the volatility of exchange-rate time series plays a crucial role in the evaluation of exchange-rate risks, in particular for the commodity currencies. The Australian dollar is currently holding the fifth rank in the global top 10 most frequently traded currencies. The popularity of the Aussie dollar among currency traders belongs to the so-called three G’s—Geology, Geography and Government policy. The Australian economy is largely driven by commodities. The strength of the Australian dollar is counter-cyclical relative to other currencies and ties proximately to the geographical, commercial linkage with Asia and the commodity cycle. As such, we consider that the Australian dollar presents strong characteristics of the commodity currency. In this study, we provide an examination of the Australian dollar–US dollar rates. For the period from 18:05, 7th August 2019 to 9:25, 16th September 2019 with a total of 8481 observations, a wavelet-based approach that allows for modelling long-memory characteristics of this currency pair at different trading horizons is used in our analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • There's More to Volatility Than Volume
    There's more to volatility than volume L¶aszl¶o Gillemot,1, 2 J. Doyne Farmer,1 and Fabrizio Lillo1, 3 1Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe, NM 87501 2Budapest University of Technology and Economics, H-1111 Budapest, Budafoki ut¶ 8, Hungary 3INFM-CNR Unita di Palermo and Dipartimento di Fisica e Tecnologie Relative, Universita di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, I-90128 Palermo, Italy. It is widely believed that uctuations in transaction volume, as reected in the number of transactions and to a lesser extent their size, are the main cause of clus- tered volatility. Under this view bursts of rapid or slow price di®usion reect bursts of frequent or less frequent trading, which cause both clustered volatility and heavy tails in price returns. We investigate this hypothesis using tick by tick data from the New York and London Stock Exchanges and show that only a small fraction of volatility uctuations are explained in this manner. Clustered volatility is still very strong even if price changes are recorded on intervals in which the total transaction volume or number of transactions is held constant. In addition the distribution of price returns conditioned on volume or transaction frequency being held constant is similar to that in real time, making it clear that neither of these are the principal cause of heavy tails in price returns. We analyze recent results of Ane and Geman (2000) and Gabaix et al. (2003), and discuss the reasons why their conclusions di®er from ours. Based on a cross-sectional analysis we show that the long-memory of volatility is dominated by factors other than transaction frequency or total trading volume.
    [Show full text]
  • Futures Price Volatility in Commodities Markets: the Role of Short Term Vs Long Term Speculation
    Matteo Manera, a Marcella Nicolini, b* and Ilaria Vignati c Futures price volatility in commodities markets: The role of short term vs long term speculation Abstract: This paper evaluates how different types of speculation affect the volatility of commodities’ futures prices. We adopt four indexes of speculation: Working’s T, the market share of non-commercial traders, the percentage of net long speculators over total open interest in future markets, which proxy for long term speculation, and scalping, which proxies for short term speculation. We consider four energy commodities (light sweet crude oil, heating oil, gasoline and natural gas) and six non-energy commodities (cocoa, coffee, corn, oats, soybean oil and soybeans) over the period 1986-2010, analyzed at weekly frequency. Using GARCH models we find that speculation is significantly related to volatility of returns: short term speculation has a positive and significant coefficient in the variance equation, while long term speculation generally has a negative sign. The robustness exercise shows that: i) scalping is positive and significant also at higher and lower data frequencies; ii) results remain unchanged through different model specifications (GARCH-in-mean, EGARCH, and TARCH); iii) results are robust to different specifications of the mean equation. JEL Codes: C32; G13; Q11; Q43. Keywords: Commodities futures markets; Speculation; Scalping; Working’s T; Data frequency; GARCH models _______ a University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, and Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milan. E-mail: [email protected] b University of Pavia, Pavia, and Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milan. E-mail: [email protected] c Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cross-Section of Volatility and Expected Returns
    THE JOURNAL OF FINANCE • VOL. LXI, NO. 1 • FEBRUARY 2006 The Cross-Section of Volatility and Expected Returns ANDREW ANG, ROBERT J. HODRICK, YUHANG XING, and XIAOYAN ZHANG∗ ABSTRACT We examine the pricing of aggregate volatility risk in the cross-section of stock returns. Consistent with theory, we find that stocks with high sensitivities to innovations in aggregate volatility have low average returns. Stocks with high idiosyncratic volatility relative to the Fama and French (1993, Journal of Financial Economics 25, 2349) model have abysmally low average returns. This phenomenon cannot be explained by exposure to aggregate volatility risk. Size, book-to-market, momentum, and liquidity effects cannot account for either the low average returns earned by stocks with high exposure to systematic volatility risk or for the low average returns of stocks with high idiosyncratic volatility. IT IS WELL KNOWN THAT THE VOLATILITY OF STOCK RETURNS varies over time. While con- siderable research has examined the time-series relation between the volatility of the market and the expected return on the market (see, among others, Camp- bell and Hentschel (1992) and Glosten, Jagannathan, and Runkle (1993)), the question of how aggregate volatility affects the cross-section of expected stock returns has received less attention. Time-varying market volatility induces changes in the investment opportunity set by changing the expectation of fu- ture market returns, or by changing the risk-return trade-off. If the volatility of the market return is a systematic risk factor, the arbitrage pricing theory or a factor model predicts that aggregate volatility should also be priced in the cross-section of stocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Volatility Predict Returns?
    Can Volatility Predict Returns? July 2016 When investing in stocks, understanding the volatility may increase expected returns. So these pundits may be of their returns can be an important ingredient to help reflecting on what has already occurred, not what will occur. investors maintain a disciplined approach. People invest their capital hoping to earn a rate of return above that of Do recent stock market volatility levels have statistically just holding cash, and there is ample evidence that capital reliable information about future stock returns? We can markets have rewarded disciplined investors. For example, examine historical data to see if there have been statistically Exhibit 1 illustrates what investing $1 in 1926 into various reliable differences in average returns or equity premiums asset classes would have translated to through the end between more volatile and less volatile markets, if a strategy of 2015. Nevertheless, returns can be negative for days, that attempts to avoid equities in times of high volatility months, and even years. After such episodes, investors are adds value over a market portfolio, and if there is any frequently exposed to stories exclaiming what may cause relation between current volatility and subsequent returns. the next financial crisis. A simple way to see if stock market volatility and returns are When volatility spikes, remaining disciplined can be even related is to look at average returns across different market more challenging as pundits are quick to link volatility to environments. In Exhibit 2, we take monthly returns for any number of impending “crises” and to predict that short- the US equity market (represented by the Fama/French term returns will be poor.
    [Show full text]
  • Tales of Tails: Jumps in Currency Markets∗
    Tales of Tails: Jumps in Currency Markets∗ Suzanne S. Leey Minho Wangz March 2019 Abstract This paper investigates the predictability of jumps in currency markets and shows the implications for carry trades. Formulating new currency jump anal- yses, we propose a general method to estimate the determinants of jump sizes and intensities at various frequencies. We employ a large panel of high-frequency data and reveal significant predictive relationships between currency jumps and national fundamentals. In addition, we identify the patterns of intraday jumps, multiple currency jump clustering and time-of-day effects. U.S. macroeconomic information releases { particularly FOMC announcements { lead to currency jumps. Using these jump predictors, investors can construct jump robust carry trades to mitigate left-tail risks. JEL classification: G15, F31, C14 Keywords: jump prediction, jump robust carry trade, general jump regression, high- frequency exchange rate data ∗For their comments and encouragement, we thank Cheol Eun, Ruslan Goyenko, Per Mykland, the participants at Stevanovich Center Conference on High Frequency Data at the University of Chicago, the Financial Management Association Annual Meeting, and the Multinational Finance Society Conference, and the seminar participants at the Georgia Institute of Technology. yAddress: Scheller College of Business at the Georgia Institute of Technology, 800 W. Peachtree St. NW, Atlanta, GA 30308, e-mail: [email protected] (corresponding author) zAddress: College of Business at Florida International University, 11200 SW 8th St., Miami, FL 33174, e-mail: minwang@fiu.edu I. Introduction A carry trade is a popular currency trading strategy in which investors invest in higher in- terest rate currencies and sell lower interest rate currencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Volatility Is Normal: Staying the Course Is Critical
    Market Volatility is Normal: Staying the Course is Critical While market volatility can be unsettling, historically, the market has recovered from intra-year declines and provided positive returns for investors over time. Intra-year decline is the difference between the highest and lowest point in the market during that year ® A positive long-term trend S&P 500 INDEX ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS & INTRA-YEAR DECLINES: 1980–2020 Since 1980, the S&P 500® Index has shown 50% Annual Total Return Max Intra-year Decline a positive return in 34 out of the 41 full years shown on this chart, which is more than 82% 40% of the time. 30% 20% Market declines throughout the year are not unusual 10% Despite this positive long-term trend, it is important to highlight that intra-year declines 0% of more than -10% are quite normal. On average, the largest drop in price from peak to trough for the index in any given calendar -10% year has been -13% over this same period. -20% -30% Patience and discipline may lead to long- term gains -40% Investors who resist the urge to react to market volatility may benefit from the potential recoveries that could follow. That’s -50% why we believe in sticking with your long- term investment plan to help you reach your -60% financial goals. 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020 Questions? Contact your Fidelity Representative at 800.544.3455 Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Indexes are unmanaged. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Co-Movement of Price Change Volatility in Forex Market
    Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2018 Vol I WCE 2018, July 4-6, 2018, London, U.K. An Analysis of the Co-movement of Price Change Volatility in Forex Market Watthana Pongsena, Prakaidoy Ditsayabut, Nittaya Kerdprasop and Kittisak Kerdprasop Abstract—Foreign exchange or Forex is the largest global ISO currency codes of the base currency and the counter distribution market in the world where all currencies are currency. For example, a symbol “EURUSD” is the traded. This market not only produces profits or losses for the indicative of the European against the US dollar where traders but also influences the exchange rate of currencies around the world. This research focuses on using the EUR represents the European and USD represents the US historical data of Forex to identify the strength of the relation dollar. Considering the quotation of EURUSD traded at a and the currency co-movement between pairwise of currencies quotation of 1.5000, EUR is the base currency and USD is based on statistical analysis approaches. The empirical results the quote currency. The quotation of EURUSD 1.5000 have identified the top ten strongest relations between the means that 1 European can be exchangeable to 1.5000 US currency pairs. In addition, the strong co-movement of price dollars. If the EURUSD quotation rises from 1.5000 to change between the EURUSD and others currency pairwise are identified. The results of our analysis are confirmed that 1.5100, means the relative value of the European has these relations are significant correlations. The knowledge increased. This could be because either value of the discovered in this research is beneficial for the Forex traders European has strengthened, or the value of US dollar has in terms of providing the empirical statistic evidences in order weakened, or it could be because of both cases, and vice enhance their knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Stock Market Volatility and Return Analysis: a Systematic Literature Review
    entropy Review Stock Market Volatility and Return Analysis: A Systematic Literature Review Roni Bhowmik 1,2,* and Shouyang Wang 3 1 School of Economics and Management, Jiujiang University, Jiujiang 322227, China 2 Department of Business Administration, Daffodil International University, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh 3 Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 27 March 2020; Accepted: 29 April 2020; Published: 4 May 2020 Abstract: In the field of business research method, a literature review is more relevant than ever. Even though there has been lack of integrity and inflexibility in traditional literature reviews with questions being raised about the quality and trustworthiness of these types of reviews. This research provides a literature review using a systematic database to examine and cross-reference snowballing. In this paper, previous studies featuring a generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedastic (GARCH) family-based model stock market return and volatility have also been reviewed. The stock market plays a pivotal role in today’s world economic activities, named a “barometer” and “alarm” for economic and financial activities in a country or region. In order to prevent uncertainty and risk in the stock market, it is particularly important to measure effectively the volatility of stock index returns. However, the main purpose of this review is to examine effective GARCH models recommended for performing market returns and volatilities analysis. The secondary purpose of this review study is to conduct a content analysis of return and volatility literature reviews over a period of 12 years (2008–2019) and in 50 different papers.
    [Show full text]