Water Transport Construction of the Greater Mekong Riparian Countries

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Water Transport Construction of the Greater Mekong Riparian Countries THE WATER TRANSPORT NETWORK BETWEEN YUNNAN AND MAINLAND SOUTHEAST ASIA ——A Study of GMS Water Transport Network Construction—— He Shengda Yunnan Academy of Social Sciences With total area of 394,000 square kilometers and with Special location of highland connecting Southwest China to Mainland Southeast Asia, Yunnan Province has six water systems, namely Lancang—Mekong River, Irrawady River, Yuanjiang—Honghe (Red) River, NuJiang—Salween River, Yangtse River and Zhujiang (Pearl) River. Knows as “the Water Tower of Asia”, Yunnan is one of China’s provinces that are plentiful of water supply as well as the only area in Asia which has six water systems. Among these water systems, Lancang-Mekong River is an international River with great significance to the riparian states, which flows from China to Mainland Southeast Asian countries. Originating from Tanggula Mountian of Northwest China’s Qinghai province and with total length of 4,880 kilometers, Lancang-Mekong River flows through Qinghai Province, Tibetan Region and seven prefectures of Yunnan Province. It enters into Mainland Southeast Asia from Xishuangbanna Prefecture at Sino-Lao PDA 244 Border Merestone and then is called Mekong River. The Mekong River flows through Lao PDA, Myanmar, Thailand, Cambodia and Vietnam, and finally affluxes into the Pacific Ocean at Mekong Delta in Southern Vietnam. Since the initiative of GMS cooperation in 1992, the Lancang-Mekong sub-region has been called Greater Mekong Sub-region (GMS) with a total area of 2.30 million square kilometers and around 250 million heads of total population. There are four international rivers within this sub-region, namely, the Greater Mekong River, Irrawady River, Yuanjiang—Honghe (Red) River and Nujiang—Salween River. All of the four rivers flow from Yunnan Province into respective Mainland Southeast Asian Countries. Among them, the three rivers of Mekong, Irrawady and Yuanjiang—Honghe are with great potentials for water transport development. These rivers could become water passage and transport network connecting China’s Yunnan Province with the five Mainland Southeast Asian countries by joint 1 cooperation and development. Construction of Water Transport Network between Yunnan and Mainland Southeast Asia 1. Development of Lancang-Mekong Sub-regional or GMS Water Transport The Lancang-Mekong River flows through the six countries and has long been the natural link among the people of the riparian countries since the ancient times. With further development of GMS cooperation, the people of the six riparian countries started to construct water transport beginning from 1990s. China’s Yunnan Province, together with Myanmar, Thailand and Lao PDA, chose Lancang-Mekong navigation as the breakthrough of GMS water transport construction. After six rounds of negotiations over the continuous seven years beginning from 1993, the said four countries signed An Agreement of Lancang-Mekong Commercial Navigation, and formulated a series of following-up rules and regulations, which makes Lancang-Mekong navigation between the four countries to be under legitimate measures and guarantees. In accordance with the agreement, the commercial navigation starts from China’s Simao Port to Louangphrabang of Lao PDA, with a total length of 786 kilometers. The Navigation route has 14 open ports and docks among which Simao, Jinghong, Menghan and Guanlei are in China’s Yunnan Province; Ban Sai, Muang Mo, Vang Baleng, Houei Sai and Louangphrabang are in Lao PDA; Wan Beng and Suo Loi (2002) are in Myanmar; Chiang Saen and Chiang Khong are in Thailand. The four countries held the Opening Ceremony of the Commercial Navigation in China’s Jinghong City on June 26th, 2001, which was counted as a new milestone of GMS navigation story. The number of Yunnan’s commercial ships on Lancang-Mekong River increased from eight to eighty-eight over the ten years from 1993 to 2002, with total carrying capacity of 9,152 tons, and with the biggest single carrying capacity increased from 60 tons to 250 tons over the same period. Recently, the freight capacity reached 300,000 tons and annual passenger carrying capacity is more than 50,000 person-times. Myanmar, Lao PDA and Thailand also have more than 50 cargo ships entering into China’s Guanlei Dock. The commercial ships from the four countries now have free access to the said navigation route. 2. Construction of Sino-Myanmar Road-Water Through Transport Irrawady River originates from the east transverse mountain range of Himalayan. It was respectively named Jitaiqu River and Dulong River in China’s Tibetan Region and Yunnan Province. After the river flows into Myanmar from Sino-Myanmar 41 Border Merestone in Yunnan’s Gongshan County, it affluxes into Nmai HkaRiver at Kanpetlet, and flows further 2 south and affluxes into Mali Hha River, where it is regarded as the upper stream of so-called Irrawady River. Before the River affluxes into Indian Ocean near Rangon City, it flows north-south through Myanmar’s major cities of Myitkyina, Bhamo, Mandalay and Pagan, which is known as “the Town of Pagoda”. With riparian areas of 430,000 square kilometers, Irrawady River has a total length of 2,200 kilometers among which 171 kilometers are in China (80 kilometers in Yunnan), and the other 2,029 kilometers are in Myanmar. The 1,277 km long Bhamo—Yangon section of Irrawady River began commercial shipment as early as in 1867 under British colony. The Road-Water Through Transport between China and Myanmar links Yunnan-Myanmar Road built in World War II with Irrawady water passage in Myanmar. Now the Yunnan section of Yunnan—Myanmar Road has been improved as highway. The Sino-Myanmar Road-Water Through Transport originates from Kunming and enters into Myanmar from Ruili of Dehong Prefecture via Kunming—Ruili Expressway (807 km). It has 116.3 km of road length from Yunnan-Myanmar border to Bhamo, where it connects Irrawady river and then extends to Yangon, with total length of waterway around 1,277 kilometers. The associated transportation agencies of both Chinese and Myanmar governments have conducted talks and surveys on this road-water through transport. 3. Sino-Vietnam Cooperation on Honghe River Transport Originating from Weishan County of Yunnan’s Dali Prefecture, Yuanjiang—Honghe River flows through 14 counties/cities within Yunnan Province and enters into Northwest Vietnam after Nanxi River joins it at Hekou City. In Vietnam, the river flows through the country’s capital, Hanoi City, and then enters into the Gulf of Tokin. Honghe River has 1,200 kilometers length, among which 695 kilometers are in Yunnan Province. It was historically a major water passage connecting Yunnan with Vietnam though the passage was later broken for a variety of reasons. With steady development of GMS cooperation over the past decade and further improvement of Sino-Vietnam bilateral relations, both Yunnan Province and Vietnam are increasingly showing interest in restoring Yuanjiang—Honghe River transport and making it as an important way of Yunnan-Vietnam water passage. The 99.4 km long section from Manhao to Hekou County of China’s Yunnan Province (the opposite side is Laocai Province of Vietnam) is to be developed into 7-level water passage with carrying capacity of 50 tons while the 505 km long section from Hekou to Vietnam’s Hai Phong, especially the 155 km long section between Hekou and Yen Bai, has many reefs and riffle. By dredging up, this section will have carrying capacity somewhere from 100 tons to 200 tons, and with total carrying capacity of the whole river around 1.0—1.5 3 million tons. Recently the two sides of Yunnan and Vietnam conducted a series of talks and feasibility studies on navigation of the river. Sub-regional Water Transport Construction: Its Implications to GMS Cooperation 1. To meet the needs of infrastructure improvement for GMS countries Lancang-Mekong River is a natural link which closely connects the six riparian countries. The establishment of China-ASEAN FTA and development of GMS economic cooperation requires the transport passage linking China with Southeast Asia and the GMS transport network to play as the major channels. Under GMS cooperation mechanisms, Lancang-Mekong sub-regional navigation, Pan-Asian Railway, Kunming-Bangkok Highway are listed as multinational or ADB-funded projects while Lancang-Mekong sub-regional navigation is the key opponent as well as the initiative of all these projects. In 2000, then Chinese Premier Zhu Rongji addressed at the 4th Sino-ASEAN Summit, “China is willing to provide financial assistance for Lao PDA and Myanmar to dredge up the Mekong River within their respective territories so as to improve the navigation conditions and to ensure security for commercial ships of the four countries.” Later on, the four countries reinforced cooperation is this respect. The China-Myanmar Road-Water Through Transport and the Yuanjiang—Honghe River water passage will also respectively improve Sino-Myanmar and Sino-Vietnam Transport networks. The sub-regional navigations of the said rivers will therefore become common interest and strategic choices of the riparian countries. 2. To speed up economic development and urbanization of the areas along the rivers Although road transport plays the most important role in GMS cooperation, water passage also occupies a large share due to its advantages in less investment with low cost of transport as well as the conditions of river areas being diverse to those of road-route areas. Over the past ten years from 1995 to 2005, the export/import volume of Yunnan Province via Lancang-Mekong water passage amounted to 3 million tons, with an accumulated trade value of RMB10 billion. Agro-byproducts, such as vegetables and fruits, are the major items of export/import trade between Yunnan and Mainland Southeast Asia. Meanwhile, the sub-regional water passages of the GMS countries also bring about prosperous businesses of commerce, plantation, stock raising, building materials, tourism as well as urbanization along the river areas.
Recommended publications
  • Controls on Modern Erosion and the Development of the Pearl River Drainage in the Late Paleogene
    Marine Geology xxx (xxxx) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Marine Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/margo Invited research article Controls on modern erosion and the development of the Pearl River drainage in the late Paleogene ⁎ Chang Liua, Peter D. Clifta,b, , Andrew Carterc, Philipp Böningd, Zhaochu Hue, Zhen Sunf, Katharina Pahnked a Department of Geology and Geophysics, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge 70803, USA b School of Geography Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China c Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Birkbeck College, University of London, London WC1E 7HX, UK d Max Planck Research Group for Marine Isotope Geochemistry, Institute of Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment (ICBM), University of Oldenburg, 26129, Germany e State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China f Key Laboratory of Marginal Sea Geology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 164 Xingangxi Road, Guangzhou 510301, China ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The Pearl River and its tributaries drains large areas of southern China and has been the primary source of Zircon sediment to the northern continental margin of the South China Sea since its opening. In this study we use a Nd isotope combination of bulk sediment geochemistry, Nd and Sr isotope geochemistry, and single grain zircon U-Pb Erosion dating to understand the source of sediment in the modern drainage. We also performed zircon U-Pb dating on Provenance Eocene sedimentary rocks sampled by International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) Expedition 349 in order to Pearl River constrain the source of sediment to the rift before the Oligocene.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: Pearl River Tower, Guangzhou, China
    ctbuh.org/papers Title: Case Study: Pearl River Tower, Guangzhou, China Authors: Roger Frechette, Director of Sustainable Engineering, Skidmore, Owings & Merrill Russell Gilchrist, Director of Technical Architecture, Skidmore, Owings & Merrill Subjects: Architectural/Design Building Case Study Sustainability/Green/Energy Keywords: Embodied Energy Energy Consumption Façade Sustainability Publication Date: 2008 Original Publication: CTBUH 2008 8th World Congress, Dubai Paper Type: 1. Book chapter/Part chapter 2. Journal paper 3. Conference proceeding 4. Unpublished conference paper 5. Magazine article 6. Unpublished © Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat / Roger Frechette; Russell Gilchrist ‘Towards Zero Energy’ A Case Study of the Pearl River Tower, Guangzhou, China Roger E. Frechette III, PE, LEED-AP1 and Russell Gilchrist, RIBA2 1Director of Sustainable Engineering, 2Director of Technical Architecture, Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP, Chicago, IL, USA Abstract Architects and engineers have a significant responsibility to ensure that the design and execution of all new construction projects be of the ‘lightest touch’ in both energy consumption, real and embodied, to ensure the longevity of the precious natural resources remain on this planet. The goal to achieve ‘carbon neutrality’ is quite possibly the single most important issue facing architects and engineers today, given the empirical evidence that construction projects far outstrip both industry and transportation as the largest contributors to carbon emissions in the world. This paper will attempt to both define what is meant by ‘carbon neutral’ in the context of building design as well as using the case study to demonstrate how such an approach might be achieved it examines the challenges of achieving a net zero energy building, both from an energy consumption perspective as well as the embodied energy of the construction.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Plastic
    Title: Mapping the Plastic Speaker: Simon Ironside Chair FIG Working Group 4.3 Date: 18 & 19 November 2019 1 Addressing the alarming problem of plastic pollution of our waterways Mapping the A surveyor’s perspective Plastic Simon Ironside Chair FIG Working Group 4.3 Plastic clogs up a waterway in Yangon, Myanmar. courtesy of Global New Light of Myanmar, 5 June 2018 Plastic Pollution Overview (Waterways) The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Australia (CSIRO) • Yangtze River, Yellow Sea, Asia • Indus River, Arabian Sea, Asia • Yellow River (Huang He), Yellow Sea, Asia Top 10 river • Hai River, Yellow Sea, Asia • Nile, Mediterranean Sea, Africa systems • Meghna/Bramaputra/Ganges, Bay of Bengal, Asia contributing • Pearl River (Zhujiang), South China Sea/East Sea, Asia • Amur River (Heilong Jiang), Sea of Okhotsk, Asia to ocean • Niger River, Gulf of Guinea, Africa plastic • Mekong River, South China Sea/East Sea, Asia *Export of plastic debris by rivers into the sea - Authors: Christian Schmidt, Tobias Krauth, Stephan Wagner, Reprinted with permission from Environmental Science & Technology 2017, 51, 21, 12246-12253. Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society.` • While ocean plastic remains a daunting problem, this could be good news for the quest to control it. Export of plastic • These 10 waterways contribute between 88 and 95 percent of the total plastic load that oceans receive via debris by rivers rivers and would be good places to focus on better waste into the sea - management. Authors: Christian • The high fraction of a few river catchments contributing the vast majority of the total load implies that potential Schmidt, Tobias Krauth, mitigation measures would be highly efficient when Stephan Wagner applied in the high-load rivers • Reducing plastic loads by 50 percent in the 10 top-ranked rivers, would reduce the total river-based load to the sea by 45 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • Transboundary River Basin Overview – Salween
    0 [Type here] Irrigation in Africa in figures - AQUASTAT Survey - 2016 Transboundary River Basin Overview – Salween Version 2011 Recommended citation: FAO. 2011. AQUASTAT Transboundary River Basins – Salween River Basin. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Rome, Italy The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licencerequest or addressed to [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Water Wars: the Brahmaputra River and Sino-Indian Relations
    U.S. Naval War College U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons CIWAG Case Studies 10-2013 Water Wars: The Brahmaputra River and Sino-Indian Relations Mark Christopher Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/ciwag-case-studies Recommended Citation Christopher, Mark, "MIWS_07 - Water Wars: The Brahmaputra River and Sino-Indian Relations" (2013). CIWAG Case Studies. 7. https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/ciwag-case-studies/7 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in CIWAG Case Studies by an authorized administrator of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Draft as of 121916 ARF R W ARE LA a U nd G A E R R M R I E D n o G R R E O T U N P E S C U N E IT EG ED L S OL TA R C TES NAVAL WA Water Wars: The Brahmaputra River and Sino-Indian Relations Mark Christopher United States Naval War College Newport, Rhode Island Water Wars: The Brahmaputra River and Sino-Indian Relations Mark Christopher Center on Irregular Warfare & Armed Groups (CIWAG) US Naval War College, Newport, RI [email protected] CHRISTOPHER: WATER WARS CIWAG Case Studies Bureaucracy Does Its Thing (in Afghanistan) – Todd Greentree Operationalizing Intelligence Dominance – Roy Godson An Operator’s Guide to Human Terrain Teams – Norman Nigh Organizational Learning and the Marine Corps: The Counterinsurgency Campaign in Iraq – Richard Shultz Piracy – Martin Murphy Reading the Tea Leaves: Proto-Insurgency in Honduras – John D.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Conflict Pathways and Peacebuilding Strategies by David Michel
    PEACEWORKS Water Conflict Pathways and Peacebuilding Strategies By David Michel NO. 164 | AUGUST 2020 NO. 164 | AUGUST 2020 ABOUT THE REPORT This report explores water-related conflict pathways and articulates potential peace- building strategies to mitigate conflict risks. The report is grounded in a survey of the ECONOMICS & ENVIRONMENT academic literature on natural resources conflict, case studies of three major basins, and participant interviews and documentary analyses of water diplomacy processes. ABOUT THE AUTHOR David Michel is a senior researcher with the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. He previously served as a senior manager at the Stockholm International Water Institute. He has over twenty years of experience working with governments, civil society, and the private sector to build cooperative solutions to policy challenges posed by global environmental change. Cover photo: A woman walks along a dry lake bed near the Rawal Dam in Pakistan on June 22, 2018. (Photo by B. K. Bangash/AP) The views expressed in this report are those of the author alone. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Institute of Peace. An online edition of this and related reports can be found on our website (www.usip.org), together with additional information on the subject. © 2020 by the United States Institute of Peace United States Institute of Peace 2301 Constitution Avenue NW Washington, DC 20037 Phone: 202.457.1700 Fax: 202.429.6063 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.usip.org Peaceworks No. 164. First published 2020. ISBN: 978-1-60127-810-4 Contents Water Insecurity and Conflict Risks 3 Water Conflict Pathways 7 Case Study: The Indus River Basin 10 Case Study: Mali 14 Case Study: Myanmar 18 Water Governance and Water Diplomacy 22 Peacebuilding Strategies for Water Resources Conflicts 26 USIP.ORG 1 Summary Growing populations and economies, unsustainable management practices, and mounting environmental pressures are exerting increasing strains on the world’s vital freshwater resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Irrigation in Southern and Eastern Asia in Figures AQUASTAT Survey – 2011
    37 Irrigation in Southern and Eastern Asia in figures AQUASTAT Survey – 2011 FAO WATER Irrigation in Southern REPORTS and Eastern Asia in figures AQUASTAT Survey – 2011 37 Edited by Karen FRENKEN FAO Land and Water Division FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2012 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-107282-0 All rights reserved. FAO encourages reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Non-commercial uses will be authorized free of charge, upon request. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes, including educational purposes, may incur fees. Applications for permission to reproduce or disseminate FAO copyright materials, and all queries concerning rights and licences, should be addressed by e-mail to [email protected] or to the Chief, Publishing Policy and Support Branch, Office of Knowledge Exchange, Research and Extension, FAO, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Dynamics and CO2 and CH4 Outgassing in the Mekong Delta
    Biogeosciences, 15, 1093–1114, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-1093-2018 © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Carbon dynamics and CO2 and CH4 outgassing in the Mekong delta Alberto V. Borges1, Gwenaël Abril2,3, and Steven Bouillon4 1Chemical Oceanography Unit, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium 2Programa de Geoquímica, Universidade Federal Fluminense, 24020015, Niterói, Brazil 3Laboratoire Environnements et Paléoenvironnements Océaniques et Continentaux, CNRS, Université de Bordeaux, 33405, Talence, France 4Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium Correspondence: Alberto V. Borges ([email protected]) Received: 20 October 2017 – Discussion started: 24 October 2017 Revised: 3 January 2018 – Accepted: 6 January 2018 – Published: 22 February 2018 Abstract. We report a data set of biogeochemical variables inorganic carbon (δ13C-DIC) indicated intense organic mat- related to carbon cycling obtained in the three branches (Mey ter degradation that was partly mediated by sulfate reduc- Tho, Hàm Luông, CoOK Chiên) of the Mekong delta (BenOK Tre tion in sediments, as revealed by the slope of total alkalinity province, Vietnam) in December 2003, April 2004, and Oc- (TA) and DIC covariations. The δ13C-POC variations also tober 2004. Both the inner estuary (upstream of the mouth) indicated intense phytoplankton growth in the side channels, and the outer estuary (river plume) were sampled, as well presumably due to nutrient enrichment related to the shrimp as side channels. The values of the partial pressure of CO2 farming ponds. A data set in the mangrove creeks of the (pCO2) ranged between 232 and 4085 ppm, O2 saturation Ca Mau province (part of the Mekong delta) was also ac- level (%O2/ between 63 and 114 %, and CH4 between 2 quired in April and October 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lancang/Mekong and the Nu/Salween Rivers: Promoting Regional Watershed Governance and Distributive Justice for Downstream Burmese Communities
    UN Symposium on Hydropower & Sustainable Development THE LANCANG/MEKONG AND THE NU/SALWEEN RIVERS: PROMOTING REGIONAL WATERSHED GOVERNANCE AND DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE FOR DOWNSTREAM BURMESE COMMUNITIES Ken MacLean Chana Maung Ann Putnam EarthRights International (ERI) EarthRights International (ERI) EarthRights International (ERI) P.O. Box 123 P.O. Box 123 P.O. Box 123 Chiang Mai University Chiang Mai University Chiang Mai University Chiang Mai, 50202 Chiang Mai, 50202 Chiang Mai, 50202 Thailand Thailand Thailand [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract: This paper examines some of the current obstacles to watershed governance and distributive justice for the diverse ethnic communities in eastern Burma that rely upon the Lancang/Mekong and Nu/Salween Rivers for their economic livelihoods and cultural survival. More than two dozen large- scale dams are planned for these two river systems. Nearly all of them will be built and/or financed by the People’s Republic of China (PRC), although other non-state actors are also centrally involved. The paper outlines some of the key forces driving the PRC to construct new dams in Yunnan despite mounting evidence that such projects will undermine rather than enhance human security and sustainable development in the region. Three projects are discussed: the Lancang/Mekong and Nu/Salween Cascades as well as the proposed Tasang Dam in northeastern Burma, which the state- owned China Export-Import Bank (CEIB) is considering financing. Special attention is focused on the environmental impacts of impoundment and the future political and economic costs of the PRC’s failure to take the interests of downstream countries and their ethnically diverse populations more fully into consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • Human-Induced Hydrological Changes in the River Network of the Pearl River Delta, South China
    GIS and Remote Sensing in Uvdrology, Water Resources and Environment (Proceedings of 1CGRHWE held at the Three Gorges Dam, China, September 2003). IAHS Publ. 289, 2004 197 Human-induced hydrological changes in the river network of the Pearl River Delta, South China XIAOHONG CHEN1 & YONGQIN DAVID CHEN2 1 Department of Water Resources and Environment, Zhongshan University, Guangzhou 510275, China eescxh(a>,zsu.edu.cn 2 Department of Geography and Resource Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong, China Abstract With the rapid socio-economic development and urbanization, dramatic changes of the hydrological characteristics have taken place in the river network of the Pearl River Delta (PRD) over the past decade. These changes can be mainly attributed to the combined effects of the following human activities: sand dredging in the river, reclamation of former flood- afflicted areas, connection of dykes, construction of numerous bridges, docks and sluices along the river and irrational regulation of water locks. Human activities, along with strong riverbed scouring and sea level rise, respectively, give rise to riverbed degradation and stage reduction in the upper river reaches of the Delta, but sedimentation and tidal backwater resistance in the river mouths. Corresponding to the stage changes, the stage-discharge relationship has been substantially modified, as evidenced by over 2-m drop of stage for the same amount of discharge in some river sections. The ratio of flow partition in river network of the PRD has also been changing continuously in recent years. This is an excellent indication of an increasingly larger portion of flow discharging from the Xijiang River channels into the river network of the Delta, which was found to be the main cause making the inner part of the PRD more and more vulnerable to flood in recent years.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Developments in the Application of Water Resource Dispatching Systems in China
    water Article Recent Developments in the Application of Water Resource Dispatching Systems in China Xinfeng Xiang 1, Lingzhong Kong 2, Huaiwei Sun 3, Xiaohui Lei 4,*, Ji Liang 3 and Yueqiang Li 5 1 Business school of Hohai University, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; [email protected] 2 College of Hydraulic Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; [email protected] 3 School of Hydropower and Information Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430072, China; [email protected] (H.S.); [email protected] (J.L.) 4 State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China 5 College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-10-882-067-56 Abstract: This paper addresses recent developments in the application of water Resource dispatching systems (WRDSs) in China. Through a survey of watershed managers and a literature analysis, it was found that water diversion projects should be the top priority of water resource management by considering the recovery construction of water diversion projects. Case studies of WRDSs in the South-to-North Water Diversion (SNWD) and Pearl River Basin are discussed in this article. The results show that total water consumption management (WCM), water quality monitoring and management (WQMM), minimum discharge flow management (MDFM), and water dispatch management (WDM) modules should be considered in WRDSs. Finally, strategies and needs for resolving water resource management problems are discussed, along with other applications of WRDSs in China.
    [Show full text]
  • 458728 1 En Bookfrontmatter 1..20
    The Anthropocene: Politik—Economics— Society—Science Volume 27 Series Editor Hans Günter Brauch, Peace Research and European Security Studies (AFES-PRESS), Mosbach, Baden-Württemberg, Germany More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/15232 http://www.afes-press-books.de/html/APESS.htm http://www.afes-press-books.de/html/APESS_27.htm# Carl Middleton • Vanessa Lamb Editors Knowing the Salween River: Resource Politics of a Contested Transboundary River Editors Carl Middleton Vanessa Lamb Center of Excellence for Resource School of Geography Politics in Social Development, University of Melbourne Center for Social Development Studies, Melbourne, VIC, Australia Faculty of Political Science Chulalongkorn University Bangkok, Thailand ISSN 2367-4024 ISSN 2367-4032 (electronic) The Anthropocene: Politik—Economics—Society—Science ISBN 978-3-319-77439-8 ISBN 978-3-319-77440-4 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77440-4 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019. This book is an open access publication. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adap- tation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
    [Show full text]