Hemidactylus Frenatus Across an Urban Gradient in Brisbane: Influence of Habitat and Potential for Impact on Native Gecko Species

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hemidactylus Frenatus Across an Urban Gradient in Brisbane: Influence of Habitat and Potential for Impact on Native Gecko Species Presence of Asian House Gecko Hemidactylus frenatus across an urban gradient in Brisbane: influence of habitat and potential for impact on native gecko species Author Newbery, Brock, Jones, Darryl Published 2007 Book Title Pest or Guest: The Zoology of Overabundance Copyright Statement © 2007 Royal Zoological Society of NSW. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the book link for access to the definitive, published version. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/18554 Link to published version http://www.rzsnsw.org.au/ Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Presence of Asian House Gecko Hemidactylus frenatus across an urban gradient in Brisbane: influence of habitat and potential for impact on native gecko species Brock Newbery1 and Darryl N. Jones1,2 1Suburban Wildlife Research Group, Australian School of Environmental Studies, Griffith University, Nathan, Qld. 4111, Australia. 2Corresponding author: Darryl Jones, [email protected] The Asian House Gecko Hemidactylus frenatus is an internationally significant invasive reptile which T has spread rapidly though the Pacific and elsewhere and has been implicated in the decline and extinction of a number of native gecko species. Although present in Darwin for some time, the C species has only recently become widespread in the Brisbane region. We investigated the density A and distribution of this and two native house-dwelling geckos in urban, suburban and bushland R environments within Brisbane. The spatially clumped insect resources associated with external light T sources were effectively utilised by both urban and suburban populations of Asian House Geckos, S suggesting likely competitive interactions between the species on structures where the species co-existed. At this time, there is no evidence of the introduced species living away from buildings B in the Brisbane region. A Key words: Asian House Gecko, invasive species, urban ecology Introduction displacement of other human-associated geckos (Greer 1989, Case et al. 1994, Petren and Case 1996, Brown Native to Asia and the Indo-pacific, the Asian House et al. 2002, Cole et al. 2005). Perhaps the most studied Gecko Hemidactylus frenatus is rapidly becoming a interaction is that which occurs between the Asian House cosmopolitan species (Worthington-Wilmer et al. 2003, Gecko and the Mourning Gecko Lepidodactylus lugubris Vences et al. 2004) with a distribution closely associated on islands throughout the Pacific (Case et al. 1994). with human habitation (Greer 1989). In the last 60 years Many forms of competition have been experimentally it has successfully colonised island habitats throughout demonstrated to exist between these species. Behavioural the Pacific region and the Americas, where it has been dominance is evidenced by the exclusion of the Mourning implicated in the decline and extinction of numerous Gecko from concentrated food resources found around other gecko species (Case et al. 1994, Hanley et al. 1998, electric lights. This dominance is not displayed as overt Brown et al. 2002, Worthington-Wilmer et al. 2003, Cole interspecific aggression, but rather, by an avoidance et al. 2005). response resulting in the Mourning Gecko occupying less The Asian House Gecko is highly synanthropic, regularly favourable foraging positions (Petren et al. 1993). The colonising human settlements and foraging on insects reduced resource acquisition in the Mourning Gecko attracted to external lights. It is thought that the species’ translates into a reduction in body condition, fecundity global distribution has increased since about the 1950s and survivorship (Case et al. 1994, Petren and Case 1996). due to increases in international shipping and cargo Significantly, in the absence of Asian House Geckos, movement (Greer 1989). Microscopic setae on the Mourning Geckos on some Pacific islands were eight sub-digital lamellae increase the climbing ability of the times more abundant on buildings than on neighbouring species (Russell 2002, Pianka and Sweet 2005), allowing islands where the two species were present together (Case it to move and forage freely on the large, structurally et al. 1994). simple, vertical and inverted surfaces (such as walls and In Australia, Asian House Geckos were first recorded in windows) often illuminated by external light sources. This 1845 at the now abandoned settlement of Port Essington superior clinging ability also affords the species access to in the Northern Territory (Greer 2004). Thereafter the high crevice spaces for egg deposition and refuge from species apparently went unrecorded until the 1960s predators. These characteristics increase its potential to when a population was discovered in suburban Darwin pass undetected in transit on shipping containers and (Swanson 1990). The first record in Brisbane was made cargo. Furthermore, the female’s capacity for functional in 1983, when customs and quarantine staff observed sperm retention facilitates successful establishment upon an apparently breeding population around the Brisbane introduction to an new location due to a reduced necessity wharves (Covacevich 2001). After an initial period of for mate acquisition (Murphy-Walker and Haley 1996). patchy distribution limited to suburbs adjacent to the During the Asian House Geckos numerous colonisation Brisbane Port, the species expanded dramatically during events, it has shown a propensity for competitive the 1990s and is now the most frequently observed house- Pp 59 - 65 in Pest or Guest: the zoology of overabundance, edited by Daniel Lunney, Peggy Eby, Pat Hutchings and Shelley Burgin. 2007. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Mosman, NSW, Australia. Newbery and Jones dwelling gecko in Brisbane (Newbery et al. 2005). It is also sites (most represented by an individual single-storey widely distributed through coastal regions of Queensland dwelling) were selected from these four habitat types. (Wilson and Swan 2003). Due to a limited number of bushland areas containing Studies of the invasive nature of the Asian House Gecko structures similar in size to a residential dwelling, only and potential competitive impacts on native geckos in three bushlands were surveyed. Australia have only recently been undertaken. Keim Sites were located in the following locations or Brisbane (2002) compared the responses of Asian House Gecko suburbs: Urban (Logan Central, Auchenflower, Spring populations to habitat edges on suburban and bushland Hill, Newstead); Suburban (Carole Park, Wynnum, sites in Brisbane and Darwin (Darwin’s Asian House Tarragindi, Easton’s Hills); Rural (Carbrook, Waterford Gecko population being at least 20 years older than West, Pallara, Closeburn); and bushland (Brisbane Forest Brisbane’s). Although it is often suggested that Asian Park, Karawatha, Daisy Hill). House Geckos are confined to anthropogenic habitats, Sites were visited during the warmer months of January- in Darwin Keim (2002) found ‘significant densities’ of April; geckos remained active throughout this period Asian House Geckos up to 150 m into bushland. In in Brisbane. The number of all house-dwelling geckos contrast, Brisbane’s Asian House Geckos tended to be at found at each site was determined using auditory and lower numbers on houses approaching suburban bushland visual sampling techniques. The external surfaces of reserves and to be absent within bushland itself. During each structure (walls, eves, verandas, foundations etc, her Brisbane surveys, Keim (2002) also recorded the but excluding under-houses where applicable) were Asian House Gecko, Dubious Dtella Gehyra dubia and systematically searched for evidence of geckos using a Robust Velvet Gecko Oedura robusta present together on suburban sites when in close proximity to bushland. hand-held torch and small binoculars (Case et al. 1994, Keim 2002, Newbery et al. 2005). Each site was surveyed Information on the density and distributions of Australian for an average of 15 minutes starting no earlier than 6.30 populations of the Asian House Gecko remains pm and finishing no later than 9.00 pm. Surveys were fragmentary. A preliminary investigation in Brisbane not conducted on nights with rain or when the ambient (Newbery et al. 2005) showed that significantly greater temperature was below 20°C. numbers were present on residential dwellings within the highly urbanised inner city suburbs compared to houses Species identification was confirmed by observation of in the less structurally dense outer suburbs. Keim (2002) phenotypic characteristics of each species. For the Asian suggested that the densities of Brisbane’s population may House Geckos (Figure 1), confirmation was based on be restricted due a comparatively cooler climate than the presence of transverse blunt tail tubercles (Wilson Darwin and / or due to the negative effects of interactions and Swan 2003) and detection of one of the three with native arboreal geckos. characteristic vocalisations of the species (Greer 1989), the most common and easily identifiable being the ‘chuck, The invasive nature of the Asian House Gecko in human chuck, chuck’ call. As the Dubious Dtella (Figure 2) bears habitats throughout the warmer regions of the world is some resemblance to the Asian House Gecko in size and now well recognised (Greer 1989, Meshaka et al. 1994, colouring (B. Newbery, pers. obs.), visual confirmation Petren and Case 1996, Hanley et al. 1998, Vences et al. was based on the lack of the blunt
Recommended publications
  • Ecology Assessment Report – 11SP237009 Report
    Ecology Assessment Report – 11SP237009 Report Release Notice This document is available through the Australia Pacific LNG (Australia Pacific LNG) Upstream Phase 1 Project controlled document system TeamBinder™. The responsibility for ensuring that printed copies remain valid rests with the user. Once printed, this is an uncontrolled document unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Third-party issue can be requested via the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project Document Control Group. Document Conventions The following terms in this document apply: • Will, shall or must indicate a mandatory course of action • Should indicates a recommended course of action • May or can indicate a possible course of action. Document Custodian The custodian of this document is the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project – Environmental Approvals Manager. The custodian is responsible for maintaining and controlling changes (additions and modifications) to this document and ensuring the stakeholders validate any changes made to this document. Deviations from Document Any deviation from this document must be approved by the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project – Environmental Approvals Manager. Doc Ref: Q-4300-15-RP-009 Revision: 0 Page 2 of 48 Approvals, Land and Stakeholder Team, Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Uncontrolled when printed unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Ecology Assessment Report – 11SP237009 Report Table of Contents 1. Introduction ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • On the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Bay of Bengal
    Herpetology Notes, volume 13: 631-637 (2020) (published online on 05 August 2020) An update to species distribution records of geckos (Reptilia: Squamata: Gekkonidae) on the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Bay of Bengal Ashwini V. Mohan1,2,* The Andaman and Nicobar Islands are rifted arc-raft of 2004, and human-mediated transport can introduce continental islands (Ali, 2018). Andaman and Nicobar additional species to these islands (Chandramouli, 2015). Islands together form the largest archipelago in the In this study, I provide an update for the occurrence Bay of Bengal and a high proportion of terrestrial and distribution of species in the family Gekkonidae herpetofauna on these islands are endemic (Das, 1999). (geckos) on the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Although often lumped together, the Andamans and Nicobars are distinct from each other in their floral Materials and Methods and faunal species communities and are geographically Teams consisted of between 2–4 members and we separated by the 10° Channel. Several studies have conducted opportunistic visual encounter surveys in shed light on distribution, density and taxonomic accessible forested and human-modified areas, both aspects of terrestrial herpetofauna on these islands during daylight hours and post-sunset. These surveys (e.g., Das, 1999; Chandramouli, 2016; Harikrishnan were carried out specifically for geckos between and Vasudevan, 2018), assessed genetic diversity November 2016 and May 2017, this period overlapped across island populations (Mohan et al., 2018), studied with the north-east monsoon and summer seasons in the impacts of introduced species on herpetofauna these islands. A total of 16 islands in the Andaman and and biodiversity (e.g., Mohanty et al., 2016a, 2019), Nicobar archipelagos (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Locality for Correlophus Ciliatus and Rhacodactylus Leachianus (Sauria: Diplodactylidae) from Néhoué River, Northern New Caledonia
    Herpetology Notes, volume 8: 553-555 (2015) (published online on 06 December 2015) A new locality for Correlophus ciliatus and Rhacodactylus leachianus (Sauria: Diplodactylidae) from Néhoué River, northern New Caledonia Mickaël Sanchez1, Jean-Jérôme Cassan2 and Thomas Duval3,* Giant geckos from New Caledonia (Pacific Ocean) We observed seven native gecko species: Bavayia are charismatic nocturnal lizards. This paraphyletic (aff.) cyclura (n=1), Bavayia (aff.) exsuccida (n=1), group is represented by three genera, Rhacodactylus, Correlophus ciliatus (n=1), Dierrogekko nehoueensis Correlophus and Mniarogekko, all endemic to Bauer, Jackman, Sadlier and Whitaker, 2006 (n=1), New Caledonia (Bauer et al., 2012). Rhacodactylus Eurydactylodes agricolae Henkel and Böhme, 2001 leachianus (Cuvier, 1829) is largely distributed on the (n=1), Mniarogekko jalu Bauer, Whitaker, Sadlier and Grande Terre including the Île des Pins and its satellite Jackman, 2012 (n=1) and Rhacodactylus leachianus islands, whereas Correlophus ciliatus Guichenot, 1866 (n=1). Also, the alien Hemidactylus frenatus Dumeril is mostly known in the southern part of the Grande and Bibron, 1836 (n=3) has been sighted. The occurrence Terre, the Île des Pins and its satellite islands (Bauer of C. ciliatus and R. leachianus (Fig. 2 and 3) represent et al., 2012). Here, we report a new locality for both new records for this site. Both gecko species were species in the north-western part of Grande Terre, along observed close to the ground, at a height of less than the Néhoué River (Fig. 1). 1.5 m. The Néhoué River is characterized by gallery forests It is the first time that R. leachianus is recorded in the growing on deep alluvial soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Animal Keepers Species List
    Revised NSW Native Animal Keepers’ Species List Draft © 2017 State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage With the exception of photographs, the State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage are pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part for educational and non-commercial use, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. Specific permission is required for the reproduction of photographs. The Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) has compiled this report in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. OEH shall not be liable for any damage which may occur to any person or organisation taking action or not on the basis of this publication. Readers should seek appropriate advice when applying the information to their specific needs. All content in this publication is owned by OEH and is protected by Crown Copyright, unless credited otherwise. It is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), subject to the exemptions contained in the licence. The legal code for the licence is available at Creative Commons. OEH asserts the right to be attributed as author of the original material in the following manner: © State of New South Wales and Office of Environment and Heritage 2017. Published by: Office of Environment and Heritage 59 Goulburn Street, Sydney NSW 2000 PO Box A290,
    [Show full text]
  • Revision of the Saxicoline Geckos of the Gehyra Punctata (Squamata: Gekkonidae) Species Complex in the Pilbara Region of Western Australia Paul Doughty1,*, Aaron M
    RECORDS OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 33 001–050 (2018) DOI: 10.18195/issn.0312-3162.33(1).2018.001-050 Spots before the eyes: revision of the saxicoline geckos of the Gehyra punctata (Squamata: Gekkonidae) species complex in the Pilbara region of Western Australia Paul Doughty1,*, Aaron M. Bauer2, Mitzy Pepper3 and J. Scott Keogh3 1 Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Western Australia 6986, Australia. 2 Department of Biology, Villanova University, 800 Lancaster Avenue, Villanova, Pennsylvania 19085, U.S.A. 3 Division of Evolution, Ecology & Genetics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia. * Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT – The Gehyra punctata species complex in the Pilbara and surrounding regions of Western Australia has long been known for its confused taxonomy. Recent collections in the region have enabled a reassessment of specimens currently referable to G. punctata. We assessed populations genetically using newly generated mitochondrial DNA data in conjunction with recently published phylogenomic data and an unpublished allozyme analysis. In addition, we carried out a detailed morphological examination involving hundreds of specimens across this taxon’s range. Many possible candidate species were recovered from these analyses, and the re-examination of morphology indicated two major clades: one small-bodied and one large-bodied, each comprising multiple divergent lineages within them. A syntype of Peropus variegatus punctatus Fry, 1914, believed to have been lost at the time of Mitchell’s revision in 1965, was recently found in the Western Australian Museum collections, and is here designated as the lectotype of G.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History Database
    Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History database Abdala, C. S., A. S. Quinteros, and R. E. Espinoza. 2008. Two new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from the puna of northwestern Argentina. Herpetologica 64:458-471. Abdala, C. S., D. Baldo, R. A. Juárez, and R. E. Espinoza. 2016. The first parthenogenetic pleurodont Iguanian: a new all-female Liolaemus (Squamata: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. Copeia 104:487-497. Abdala, C. S., J. C. Acosta, M. R. Cabrera, H. J. Villaviciencio, and J. Marinero. 2009. A new Andean Liolaemus of the L. montanus series (Squamata: Iguania: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. South American Journal of Herpetology 4:91-102. Abdala, C. S., J. L. Acosta, J. C. Acosta, B. B. Alvarez, F. Arias, L. J. Avila, . S. M. Zalba. 2012. Categorización del estado de conservación de las lagartijas y anfisbenas de la República Argentina. Cuadernos de Herpetologia 26 (Suppl. 1):215-248. Abell, A. J. 1999. Male-female spacing patterns in the lizard, Sceloporus virgatus. Amphibia-Reptilia 20:185-194. Abts, M. L. 1987. Environment and variation in life history traits of the Chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus. Ecological Monographs 57:215-232. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2003. Anfibios y reptiles del Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay: Facultad de Ciencias. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2007. Anfibio y reptiles del Uruguay, 3rd edn. Montevideo, Uruguay: Serie Fauna 1. Ackermann, T. 2006. Schreibers Glatkopfleguan Leiocephalus schreibersii. Munich, Germany: Natur und Tier. Ackley, J. W., P. J. Muelleman, R. E. Carter, R. W. Henderson, and R. Powell. 2009. A rapid assessment of herpetofaunal diversity in variously altered habitats on Dominica.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Reptiles and Amphibians at Bimblebox Nature Reserve - Queensland
    Summary of an Observational Survey of Reptiles and Amphibians at Bimblebox Nature Reserve - Queensland Graham Armstrong – May, 2016 Objective - to provide an updated and more complete list of the herpetofauna recorded from Bimblebox Nature Refuge. Approach - 1. Review available data and records pertaining to the herpetofauna at Bimblebox Nature Refuge. 2. Visit Bimblebox Nature Refuge during Spring, Summer and Autumn seasons to make observational and photographic records of the herpetofauna observed. Methodology - In order to maximise the number of species recorded, 3 successive 2.5 day visits were made to BNR, one in September 2015, Jan 2016 and the end of April 2016. This approach potentially broadens the range of weather conditions experienced and hence variety of reptiles and amphibians encountered when compared to a single field visit. Survey methodology involved walking and driving around the nature refuge during the day and after dark (with the aid of a head torch to detect eye-shine). Active reptiles including those that ran for or from cover while passing by were recorded. Frequently, in situ photographic evidence of individuals was obtained and the photographs are available for the purpose of corroborating identification. To avoid any double counting of individual animals the Refuge was traversed progressively and the locations of animals were recorded using a GPS. During any one visit no area was traversed twice and when driving along tracks, reptiles were only recorded the first time a track was traversed unless a new species was detected at a later time. Available Records The most detailed list of reptiles and amphibians recorded as occurring on Bimblebox Nature Reserve comes from the standardised trapping program of Eric Vanderduys of CSIRO in Townsville.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 7 an Identification Key to the Geckos of the Seychelles
    HERPETOLOGICAL JOURNAL. Vol. I. pp. 17-19 (19X5l 17 AN IDENTIFICATION KEY TO THE GECKOS OF THE SEYCHELLES, WITH BRIEF NOTES ON THEIR DISTRIBUTIONS AND HABITS ANDREW S. GARDNER Department of Zoology, University of Aberdren. Ti/lydrone Avenue, Aberdeen AB9 2TN. U. K. Present addresses: The Calton Laboratory. Department of Genetics and Biomet IT, Universif.I' Co/legr London. Wo/f�·on !-louse, 4 Stephenson Wa r London NWI 21-11'.. U.K. (A ccepted 24. /0. 84) INTRODUCTION 4. Scales on chest and at least anterior of belly keeled. Underside white. Phe!suma astriata The Republic of Seychelles, lying in the western Tornier. 5. Indian Ocean consists of a group of mountainous, granitic islands, and a large number of outlying coral Scales on chest and belly not keeled. 6. atolls and sand cays, distributed over 400,000 km2 of sea. There are over a hundred islands, ranging in size 5. Subcaudal scales keeled and not transversely from Mahe, at 148 km2 to islands little more than enlarged in original tails. Ground colour of emergent rocks. A total of eighteen species of lizard, rump and tail usually bright blue, and of from three families are recorded from the Seychelles nanks, green. Tail unmarked or spotted with (Gardner, 1984). The best represented family is the red. Red transverse neck bars often reduced or Gekkonidae with eleven species, fo ur of which are absent. Phe/suma astriata astriata Tornier i endemic to the islands. The identification key 90 1. presented here should enable interested naturalists to Subcaudal scales unkeeled and transversely identify any gecko encountered in the Seychelles to the enlarged in original tails.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of Hemidactylus Geckos from the Gulf
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 34 (2005) 480–485 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Phylogenetic relationships of Hemidactylus geckos from the Gulf of Guinea islands: patterns of natural colonizations and anthropogenic introductions estimated from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences José Jesusa, Antonio Brehma, D. James Harrisb,¤ a Centre of Macaronesian Studies, University of Madeira, Penteada, 9000 Funchal, Portugal b Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos (CIBIO\UP), ICETA, Campus Agrario de Vairão, 4485-661 Vila do Conde, Portugal Received 26 February 2004; revised 16 September 2004 Available online 1 January 2005 Abstract Mitochondrial DNA (12S rRNA, 16S rRNA, and cytochrome b) sequences and nuclear sequences (C-mos and -Enolase) were analyzed within all known Hemidactylus species from all three volcanic islands in the Gulf of Guinea that have never been connected to the continent. These comprise both endemic and widespread species. Our aim was to determine if the widespread species was intro- duced anthropogenically, to determine the number of distinct genetic lineages within the islands, and to determine if the endemic forms constituted a monophyletic group. Our results suggest that a previously undescribed species on São Tomé is the sister taxon to Hemidactylus newtoni, endemic to Annobon. Genetic variation between populations of Hemidactylus greeWi from São Tomé and Principe is very high based on mtDNA sequences, but the forms cannot be distinguished using the nuclear DNA sequences. Hemi- dactylus mabouia appears to have been anthropogenically introduced to all three islands. The island endemics do not form a mono- phyletic group, suggesting multiple independent colonizations of the islands. 2004 Elsevier Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunistic Feeding by House-Dwelling Geckos: Does This Make Them More Successful Invaders?
    The Herpetological Bulletin 149, 2019: 38-40 SHORT COMMUNICATION https://doi.org/10.33256/hb149.3840 Opportunistic feeding by house-dwelling geckos: does this make them more successful invaders? ROBBIE WETERINGS1* & PREEYAPORN WETERINGS1 1 Cat Drop Foundation, Drachten, Netherlands *Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] Abstract - Various species of ‘house’ gecko are found in and around buildings, where they can be observed feeding opportunistically on the insects attracted to artificial lights. Most of the species are considered strict insectivores. Nevertheless, there have been several recently published observations of ‘house’ geckos feeding on non-insect food. In order to assess how common this behaviour is among geckos worldwide, we offered an online questionnaire to ecologists and herpetologists. Of the 74 observations received, most reported Hemidactylus frenatus, H. platyurus and Gehyra mutilata feeding on rice, bread, fruits, vegetables, dog food or chocolate cream, taken from tables, plates, and garbage bins. This opportunistic feeding behaviour is much more common than previously thought and is perpetrated by species considered to be highly invasive, possibly contributing to their success as invaders. INTRODUCTION 2. What did the gecko consume? a. Insects or other invertebrates everal gecko species (e.g. Hemidactylus frenatus and b. Fruit or vegetables SGehyra mutilata) are often found in and around houses. c. Rice These, so-called ‘house’ geckos, are very well adapted to d. Bread urban life and are often observed feeding opportunistically e. Eggs on insects attracted to artificial lights at night (Tkaczenko f. Unsure et al., 2014). This provides them an easily accessible food g. Other... source in locations generally lacking predators.
    [Show full text]
  • Fitzroy, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved EMP Appendices 1 to 12
    Appendix 1. Field Management Plans Environmental Management/ Control Monitoring Monitoring Report Objective Impact Activity Reporting Action Responsibility Value Strategy Action Frequency Frequency Flora/fauna No permanent Loss of protected • All vegetation Ensure all necessary Visual Weekly Corrective action record as Induction Person in charge detrimental flora species, clearing permits and approvals are required training impact to essential habitat • Removal of fertile in place and compliance Prior to start of biodiversity or and biodiversity topsoil obligations communicated work ecological to site personnel prior to function commencing vegetation clearing Mark the boundary of the Visual weekly Corrective action record as Monthly Person in charge work program area with required (summary in tape and/ or hi-viz fencing monthly designated for ‘No Go report) Zones’ and monitor integrity Ensure site specific fire Audit At start of new Audit report As required Person in charge management plans are in work and place quarterly Weed invasion/ • All vegetation Upgrade existing tracks Visual Weekly Corrective action record as Monthly Weeds Officer infestation and / clearing where practical to required increased • Accessing site by accommodate the heavy occurrence or vehicle vehicle traffic (including abundance of widening). feral animals Vehicle wash down prior Weed certificate Prior to Certificate At Weeds Officer to entering the area mobilization commencemen t Vehicle wash down for the Weed certificate As required Self-assessment As required
    [Show full text]