DOCSLIB.ORG

Protea Glabra Thunb

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Protea Glabra Thunb Protea glabra Thunb. Clanwilliam Sugarbush Kaiingsuikerbos Other Common Names: Brownsel Sugarbush, Age to first flowering: First flowers recorded Chestnut Sugarbush, Scented Protea, at 1 years, 50% estimated at 2 years, and Bierbos, Kaiingbos, Kaiinghout, Kayang 100% recorded at 3 years. Sugarbush, Kreupelwaboom, 1 Krukkelwaboom, Kruppelwaboom. g in Other Scientific Names: banksii Kotzsch ex er w Meisn, buekiana Meisn, pyrifolia Buek ex 0.5 Meisn, thunbergii (Endl). s flo % Site 1094 Records 0 0123456789101112 Population (1088 records): 21% Common, Age (Years after fire) 59% Frequent, 20% Rare. Height (1076 records): 6% 0.2-1 m tall, 45% 1- Dispersion (984 records): 67% variable, 2 m tall, 48% 2-5 m tall, 1% taller than 5 m. 31% clumped, 1% widespread. Pollinators (58 records): 74% beetles, Flowering (1058 records with: Jan 43, Feb 33, 10% birds, 10% bees or wasps, 3% flies, Mar 103, Apr 89, May 39, Jun 116, Jul 93, 2% butterflies or moths. Aug 145, Sep 149, Oct 174, Nov 59, Dec Detailed Pollinators (17 records): Monkey 15): Buds from Mar to Aug ; Flowering from Beetle (4), Southern Double-collared Jun to Sep 32; Peak Flowering from not Sunbird (2), Malachite Sunbird (2), Honey significant; Over from Sep to Nov; Fruit Bee (2), Green Stripy Beetle (2), Great from Sep to May; Nothing from Mar to Apr Protea Beetle (2), Orange-breasted Sunbird, and Dec. Peak levels at 91% in Aug. Green Monkey Beetle, Green Beetle. Historically recorded as flowering from Jul to Nov, principally Aug to Sep. Habitat: 2320 Distance to Ocean (1078 Altitude (m) records): 100% inland - 2120 further than 2 km from 1920 coast. 1720 Altitude (1078 records): 140 - 1520 1460 m; 620 lq - 800 med - 960 1320 uqm. 1120 920 Landform (1068 records): 620 47% shallow soil, 45% deep 420 soil, 7% rocky outcrops. 220 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN Slope (1072 records): 20 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 62% gentle incline, Growth (1050 records with: Jan 45, Feb 33, 15% platform, Mar 102, Apr 88, May 39, Jun 119, Jul 91, 13% hill top, N 7% steep incline, NW Aug 142, Sep 148, Oct 174, Nov 54, Dec 3% valley bottom. NE 15): Much from Sep to Nov; Rare from Sep W to Feb; None from all year round. Peak Aspect (840 records): levels at 64% in Oct. 31% East, 29% South, SW 23% North, E 17% West. S SE Soil Type (1063 records): 59% sandy, 26% rocky, 7% loamy, 7% gravelly, 1% clayey. Soil Colour (1054 records): 37% brown, 29% grey, 12% yellow, 9% white, 8% orange, 5% red. Geology (1031 records): 95% sandstone, 3% shale, 2% silcrete or ferricrete. Vegetation (1072 records): 99% shrubland. JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN Conservation Status and Threat: Seedlings (422 records): Absent in 99%: fewer Red Data List Status: Least Concern. seedlings than prefire adults in 3 cases. Occurrence (Fynbos): 6 943 km2 with 13% Seedlings found in Jan (2) and Sep. conserved and 11% lost; Occupancy: Fire Survival (24 records): 63% escaped fires 1 278 km2 with 17% conserved and 8% lost. in fire-safe areas, 21% resprouted from Fragmentation index: 12%. underground boles, 8% eliminated from the Nature Reserves (1078 records): 19% in nature area by fires, 8% survived by seedlings only. reserves - inadequately conserved. Habitat destruction (1058 records): Slender green beetle (AWA95081605); A 77% extensive natural habitat, 12% islands, small green longish beetle shiny with stripes 9% naturally fragmented habitats, lengthwise down its wing covers 1% naturally linear habitats. (OUT97092104); A lot of beetles on open Alien Invasive Species (1049 records): flowers (SMS98091401); 91% none, 4% Fabaceae (chiefly alien Habitat Acacia), 4% Pinus. Lots of very young plants next to edge of Alien Density (1048 records): 91% alien-free, seepage (AWA99091804); Increasing in the 7% sparse. sand! (AWAY0101501); Some in deep sand between rocks! Cultivation & Utilization: (AGRY4041707); In sandy soil: seems Picking (693 records): 100% no sign of suspicious! (AWA97082604); Crazy plants picking. on sand with not a rock bed in sight Cultivation Status: Plantings - 1 record (AWA98082805); (0.09%). Always on thinner soils or solid rock Witch's Broom Infestation: 75 records (7%). (AGR92082701-3); Grow in what seems solid rock (JAT94111803); Almost Atlassers Notes: exclusively on plateau with solid bed-rock Size (WIJ94041402); On rocky slabs One plant over 8m tall spectacular, within 20m (PMRY0100105, WIJY1031704); Grow only of it was a creeping form lying prostrate on in the cracks of the sandstone bedrock rock up to 1m diam.- flowerhead typical! (PVR94082901); Many grow out of cracks in (AGRY0012934); rocky escarpment (WIJ93082703); Grows Some gigantic (AWA96082101); out of cracks in solid bedrock in level areas Also many plants of height 2 and 3 - an age (WIJ94041205); On rocks (SGAY1022406- spread? (TLE97101106) ; Quite a few young 7; SGAY1022509, TLE98111707); plants - older plants very old with old thick Concentrated on rocky areas with shallow stumps (WMP97100401); soils (SGAY1022510); Confined to rocky Flowering areas (SHR95052701-2, SHR95061802 Its usual self this time of the year with WMPY2051201); Confined to rocky outcrop everything from nothing to cone (TLE97101203, TLEY0052001); On rocky (AWA98082703); Some bushes had buds outcrops (TLEY0052005, TLEY0052102-3, flowers and new growth all together TLEY0092302-3+06-7); Growing on cliff (JAT97083002); face (TLEY0052104, TLEY0092401); All buds (some quite large) aborted Witches Broom (AGRY0092916); All buds dead 5-10% of plants dead with Witches Broom (SAS99042602); Most have buds which have (AGRY0012940); totally dried up (WIJ94041404); Very heavily infested (WMP97100401); Forms and hybrids Heavily infested (LYM99072502, 1 plant seen with very large leaves -almost P. PGD93091801, SAS99042403, laurifolia like -but typical glabra SAS99042503, SAS99042603, flowerheads (AGRY0103136); VCH99072502); Occasional Growth (SMRY0050602); On one plant New growth on small plants (AWA96082007, (SMR98082704); Covered and not very AWA97082702); Many young with new healthy (VCH98082705); No Witches growth (AWA97082201); Broom – unusual! (WMP99042503); Stress and mortality Devils Growth (AWA96082203); Dying! Of which seven are 'non-seedlings' (AWA95082608); Looked stressed Confusing Species: None noted. (AWA96082002); Experiencing water stress Records of identification queries = 9 (SHRY0070901); Many dying – drought? (WIJY1031713); Almost half of seen were Variation and Taxonomy: No variation noted. dead (AGRY0102606); Utilization Distribution: Add. Some chopped down - for firewood? INCLUDEPICTURE (AGRY5122905); Pollination "C:\\temp\\atlas\\PRGLAB_m.jpg" \* As always has this longish green striped (really MERGEFORMAT \d ridged on elytra) beetle (AGRY0092315); Protea inopina Rourke Large-nut Sugarbush Stompiewaboom Other Common Names: None known. 1 Other Scientific Names: None. g n eri w o l 21 Records 0.5 f es t Population (19 records): 11% Common, i S 63% Frequent, 26% Rare. % Dispersion (19 records): 53% variable, 0 42% clumped, 5% evenly distributed. 0123456789101112 Flowering (21 records with: Jan 1, Feb 2, Mar Age (Years after fire) 0, Apr 0, May 3, Jun 0, Jul 0, Aug 3, Sep 1, Oct 0, Nov 0, Dec 11): Buds from Dec to Jan Height (21 records): 5% 0-0.2 m tall, 90% 0.2- and May and Aug; Flowering from Aug; 1 m tall, 5% 1-2 m tall. Peak Flowering not recorded; Over not Pollinators (1 record): 100% beetles. significant; Fruit from Sep to Feb; Nothing Detailed Pollinators: No additional data. not significant. Peak levels unreliable at 2320 100% in Aug. Historically recorded as Habitat: Altitude (m) flowering from Sep to Dec. Distance to Ocean (19 records): 2120 100% inland - further than 2 km 1920 from coast. 1720 Altitude (19 records): 560 - 760 m; 1520 620 lq - 660 med - 680 uqm. 1320 1120 Landform (19 records): 63% deep 920 soil, 21% shallow soil, 620 16% rocky outcrops. 420 Slope (19 records): 79% gentle 220 incline, 21% steep incline. 20 Aspect (18 records): 44% North, 00.20.4 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN 36% East, 11% South, 8% West. Growth (21 records with: Jan 1, Feb 2, Mar 0, N Apr 0, May 3, Jun 0, Jul 0, Aug 3, Sep 1, Oct 0, Nov 0, Dec 11): Much from Feb and Sep; Soil Type (19 Rare from Feb, May, Aug and Dec; None records): NW NE from Dec to Jan, May and Aug. Peak levels 58% sandy, unreliable at 100% in Sep. 37% loamy, W SW 5% gravelly. S E Soil Colour (19 SE records): 63% brown, 26% grey, 5% white, 5% orange. Geology (18 records): 94% sandstone, 6% conglomerate. Vegetation (19 records): 100% shrubland. Conservation Status and Threat: Red Data List Status: Vulnerable D2(i,ii). Occurrence (Fynbos): 6 km2 with 0% conserved JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN and 9% lost; Occupancy: 9 km2 with 0% conserved and 12% lost. Fragmentation Seedlings (9 records): All without any seedlings index meaningless. present. Nature Reserves (19 records): 5% in nature Fire Survival : No data. reserves - inadequately conserved. Age to first flowering: Data only recorded at Habitat destruction (19 records): 100% at 7 years. 79% extensive natural habitat, 21% islands. Alien Invasive Species (17 records): 100% none. Alien Density (17 records): 100% alien-free. Cultivation & Utilization: Picking (17 records): 94% no sign of picking, 6% lightly picked. Cultivation Status: Plantings - 2 records (10%). Witch's Broom Infestation: 4 records (19%). Confusing Species: None noted. Records of identification queries = 1. Atlassers Notes: Damage Variation and Taxonomy: None recorded. Most buds do not mature and ends of stems all withering bark (CAR93080801); Distribution: Add. All badly damaged by insects, leaves also badly INCLUDEPICTURE damaged (CAR93080801); Numbers "C:\\temp\\atlas\\PRINOP_m.jpg" \* Approx 50 plants seen (LYM98120507); MERGEFORMAT \d Probably 100-150 adults (NAH92081512); Protea nitida Miller Wagon Tree Waboom Other Common Names: Large-flower Jun (5), Jul (9), Aug (21), Sep (7), Oct (5), Erodendrum, Proud Protea, Tree Protea, Nov (17) and Dec (8).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Method to Estimate Dry-Kiln Schedules and Species Groupings: Tropical and Temperate Hardwoods
    United States Department of Agriculture Method to Estimate Forest Service Forest Dry-Kiln Schedules Products Laboratory Research and Species Groupings Paper FPL–RP–548 Tropical and Temperate Hardwoods William T. Simpson Abstract Contents Dry-kiln schedules have been developed for many wood Page species. However, one problem is that many, especially tropical species, have no recommended schedule. Another Introduction................................................................1 problem in drying tropical species is the lack of a way to Estimation of Kiln Schedules.........................................1 group them when it is impractical to fill a kiln with a single Background .............................................................1 species. This report investigates the possibility of estimating kiln schedules and grouping species for drying using basic Related Research...................................................1 specific gravity as the primary variable for prediction and grouping. In this study, kiln schedules were estimated by Current Kiln Schedules ..........................................1 establishing least squares relationships between schedule Method of Schedule Estimation...................................2 parameters and basic specific gravity. These relationships were then applied to estimate schedules for 3,237 species Estimation of Initial Conditions ..............................2 from Africa, Asia and Oceana, and Latin America. Nine drying groups were established, based on intervals of specific Estimation
    [Show full text]
  • The Flora Protection Act, 2000 Legal Notice No.10 of 2000
    The Flora Protection Act, 2000 Legal Notice No.10 of 2000 Gazetted as VOL. XXXVI I I MBABANE, Friday, Septem ber 22nd., 2000 [ No. 606] Presented by the Minister for Agriculture and Cooperatives MEMORANDUM OF OBJECTS AND REASONS The purpose of this Bill is to repeal and replace the Flora Protection Act No. 45 of 1952 so as to provide for m ore effective protection of flora and to provide for m atters incidental thereto. P. M. DLAMI NI Attorney General A BI LL entitled An Act to protect indigenous flora and to provide for m atters incidental thereto. ENACTED by the King and the Parliam ent of Swaziland. Short title and commencement 1. This Act m ay be cited as the Flora Protection Act, 2000 and shall com e into force on such date as the Minister m ay, by notice in the Gazette, appoint. Interpretation 2. I n this Act, unless the context otherwise requires: - "Authority" m eans the Swaziland Environm ent Authority established by the Swaziland Environm ent Authority Act No. 15 of 1992; "cultivate" m eans to prom ote, stim ulate or foster the growth of a plant, or plant m aterial (including seed) obtained lawfully in term s of this Act, and "cultivated" and "cultivation" have corresponding m eanings; "endem ic flora" m eans any flora whose natural distribution is restricted to the boundaries of Swaziland; "flora reserve" m eans a reserve established in term s of Section 3; "indigenous flora" m eans any plant whose natural distribution is Southern Africa including Swaziland; "land" includes land with or without buildings thereon; "Minister" m eans the Minister responsible for Flora; "plant" m eans any vegetative or reproductive growth including fungi, algae, m osses, lichens, liverworts, ferns, fern allies or seed plant whether living or dead; "owner" m eans: - a.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathogens Associated with Diseases. of Protea, Leucospermum and Leucadendron Spp
    PATHOGENS ASSOCIATED WITH DISEASES. OF PROTEA, LEUCOSPERMUM AND LEUCADENDRON SPP. Lizeth Swart Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Agriculture at the University of Stellenbosch Supervisor: Prof. P. W. Crous Decem ber 1999 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za DECLARATION 1, the undersigned, hereby declare that the work contained in this thesis is my own original work and has not previously in its entirety or in part been submitted at any university for a degree. SIGNATURE: DATE: Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za PATHOGENS ASSOCIATED WITH DISEASES OF PROTEA, LEUCOSPERMUM ANDLEUCADENDRONSPP. SUMMARY The manuscript consists of six chapters that represent research on different diseases and records of new diseases of the Proteaceae world-wide. The fungal descriptions presented in this thesis are not effectively published, and will thus be formally published elsewhere in scientific journals. Chapter one is a review that gives a detailed description of the major fungal pathogens of the genera Protea, Leucospermum and Leucadendron, as reported up to 1996. The pathogens are grouped according to the diseases they cause on roots, leaves, stems and flowers, as well as the canker causing fungi. In chapter two, several new fungi occurring on leaves of Pro tea, Leucospermum, Telopea and Brabejum collected from South Africa, Australia or New Zealand are described. The following fungi are described: Cladophialophora proteae, Coniolhyrium nitidae, Coniothyrium proteae, Coniolhyrium leucospermi,Harknessia leucospermi, Septoria prolearum and Mycosphaerella telopeae spp. nov. Furthermore, two Phylloslicla spp., telopeae and owaniana are also redecribed. The taxonomy of the Eisinoe spp.
    [Show full text]
  • (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) from Protea Nitida in South Africa
    Zootaxa 3694 (2): 178–184 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3694.2.7 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1FCE5CE1-4E3F-46B5-B7AC-F712D9F56180 A new species of Dialeurolobus (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) from Protea nitida in South Africa I.M. MILLAR1 & J.W. DOOLEY2 1 Biosystematics Division, ARC-Plant Protection Research Institute, Private Bag X134, Queenswood, Pretoria, 0121 South Africa. E-mail: [email protected] 2United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine, 389 Oyster Point Blvd, Suite 2A, South San Francisco, CA 94080, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Dialeurolobus proteae sp. nov. is described from Protea nitida (Proteaceae) in South Africa, and from specimens inter- cepted on protea plants imported into the U.S.A. from South Africa. Its affinities to the other species of Dialeurolobus are discussed, and a diagnostic key is provided to identify the species of this genus. Key words: Hemiptera, Aleyrodidae, whiteflies, Dialeurolobus, new species, key, Protea nitida, South Africa Introduction This species was collected in 1991 on the leaves of Protea nitida Mill. (Proteaceae) in the Western Cape area of South Africa, and the material was deposited in the South African National Collection of Insects (SANC), Pretoria, South Africa. In 2001, several specimens from this sample were donated to The Natural History Museum, London (BMNH), where they were subsequently determined by J.H. Martin as being a new species, referable to the genus Dialeurolobus.
    [Show full text]
  • These De Doctorat
    Université d’Antananarivo Faculté des Sciences Département de Biochimie fondamentale et appliquée ------------------------------------------------------------------- THESE DE DOCTORAT en Sciences de la Vie - Spécialité : Biochimie Etudes chimique et biologique d’une plante médicinale malgache : Dilobeia thouarsii (PROTEACEAE) Présentée et soutenue publiquement par : RAVELOMANANA- RAZAFINTSALAMA Vahinalahaja Eliane Titulaire de DEA Biochimie appliquée aux sciences médicales Le 02 février 2012 Composition du jury : Président : ANDRIANARISOA Blandine, Professeur titulaire Rapporteur interne : RAZANAMPARANY Julia Louisette, Professeur titulaire Rapporteur externe : RAMANOELINA Panja, Professeur titulaire Examinateur : RAZAFIMAHEFA-RAMILISON Reine Dorothée, Professeur titulaire Directeurs de thèse : JEANNODA Victor, Professeur titulaire MAMBU Lengo, Maître de Conférences HDR Remerciements Dédicaces Je dédie ce travail de thèse à mes proches: A mon mari Rado, et à mon fils Randhy, source d’amour et de tendresse, qui n’ont jamais cessé de croire en moi. Ma plus profonde reconnaissance va à vous, pour votre irremplaçable et inconditionnel soutien tout au long de ces années de travail. Merci d’avoir partagé avec moi les hauts et les bas de ces années de thèse, merci pour vos encouragements quotidiens et vos prières. Sans vous, cette thèse n’aurait jamais vu le jour. A Dada et Neny, qui ont toujours été là pour moi, m’ont donné sans compter tous les moyens pour réussir, pour leurs sacrifices et leurs prières incessantes. Merci de m’avoir toujours soutenue et de m’avoir aidée à surmonter toutes les difficultés rencontrées au cours de cette thèse. A ma belle‐mère, Neny, qui m’a beaucoup aidée et encouragée durant mes séjours à l’étranger. Merci pour tes conseils et tes prières.
    [Show full text]
  • Avian Pollinators and the Pollination Syndromes of Selected Mountain Fynbos Plants
    Avian pollinators and the pollination syndromes of selected Mountain Fynbos plants A.G. Rebelo, W.R. Siegfried and A.A. Crowe FitzPatrick Institute, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch The flowering phenology of Erica and proteaceous plants and Introduction the abundance of nectarivorous birds were monitored in Mountain fynbos is a major vegetation type in the fynbos Mountain Fynbos in the Jonkershoek State Forest, South Africa. Species tended to flower for short periods in summer biome (Kruger 1979) which corresponds geographically at high altitudes, or for longer periods in autumn and winter with the 'Capensis' region, delineated by Werger (1978) as at low altitudes. Three avian species apparently tracked the one of the plant biogeographical regions of southern Africa. flowers occurring at low altitudes during winter and, when The structural character of fynbos vegetation is largely present. at high altitudes during summer. Statistical analyses determined by three families, Restionaceae, Proteaceae and confirmed that the distribution of Promerops cafer is primarily Ericaceae, and the flora is notable for its great richness in correlated with the abundance of protea flowers, and that of species (Taylor 1979) . Nectarinia vio/acea with Erica flowers. The evolution of an Nearly all members of the Restionaceae are dioecious, unusually high ratio of putative avian pollinators to wind-pollinated graminoids (Pillans 1928) , whereas the ornithophilous plant species in Mountain Fynbos is discussed. Ericaceae and Proteaceae display more diverse pollination S. Afr. J. Bot. 1984, 3: 285-296 syndromes with a high proportion of putative bird-pollinated Die bloeifenologie van Erica en proteaplante en die talrykheid species (Baker & Oliver 1967; Rourke 1980, pers.
    [Show full text]
  • Bark Medicines Used in Traditional Healthcare in Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa: an Inventory
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector South African Journal of Botany 2003, 69(3): 301–363 Copyright © NISC Pty Ltd Printed in South Africa — All rights reserved SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY ISSN 0254–6299 Bark medicines used in traditional healthcare in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: An inventory OM Grace1, HDV Prendergast2, AK Jäger3 and J van Staden1* 1 Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Botany and Zoology, University of Natal Pietermaritzburg, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa 2 Centre for Economic Botany, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, United Kingdom 3 Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Royal Danish School of Pharmacy, 2 Universitetsparken, 2100 Copenhagen 0, Denmark * Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Received 13 June 2002, accepted in revised form 14 March 2003 Bark is an important source of medicine in South Overlapping vernacular names recorded in the literature African traditional healthcare but is poorly documented. indicated that it may be unreliable in local plant identifi- From thorough surveys of the popular ethnobotanical cations. Most (43%) bark medicines were documented literature, and other less widely available sources, 174 for the treatment of internal ailments. Sixteen percent of species (spanning 108 genera and 50 families) used for species were classed in threatened conservation cate- their bark in KwaZulu-Natal, were inventoried. gories, but conservation and management data were Vernacular names, morphological and phytochemical limited or absent from a further 62%. There is a need for properties, usage and conservation data were captured research and specialist publications to address the in a database that aimed to synthesise published infor- gaps in existing knowledge of medicinal bark species mation of such species.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Sector Plan for the Zululand District Municipality, Kwazulu-Natal
    EZEMVELO KZN WILDLIFE Biodiversity Sector Plan for the Zululand District Municipality, KwaZulu-Natal Technical Report February 2010 The Project Team Thorn-Ex cc (Environmental Services) PO Box 800, Hilton, 3245 Pietermaritzbur South Africa Tel: (033) 3431814 Fax: (033) 3431819 Mobile: 084 5014665 [email protected] Marita Thornhill (Project Management & Coordination) AFZELIA Environmental Consultants cc KwaZulu-Natal Western Cape PO Box 95 PO Box 3397 Hilton 3245 Cape Town 8000 Tel: 033 3432931/32 Tel: 072 3900686 Fax: 033 3432033 or Fax: 086 5132112 086 5170900 Mobile: 084 6756052 [email protected] [email protected] Wolfgang Kanz (Biodiversity Specialist Coordinator) John Richardson (GIS) Monde Nembula (Social Facilitation) Tim O’Connor & Associates P.O.Box 379 Hilton 3245 South Africa Tel/ Fax: 27-(0)33-3433491 [email protected] Tim O’Connor (Biodiversity Expert Advice) Zululand Biodiversity Sector Plan (February 2010) 1 Executive Summary The Biodiversity Act introduced several legislated planning tools to assist with the management and conservation of South Africa’s biological diversity. These include the declaration of “Bioregions” and the publication of “Bioregional Plans”. Bioregional plans are usually an output of a systematic spatial conservation assessment of a region. They identify areas of conservation priority, and constraints and opportunities for implementation of the plan. The precursor to a Bioregional Plan is a Biodiversity Sector Plan (BSP), which is the official reference for biodiversity priorities to be taken into account in land-use planning and decision-making by all sectors within the District Municipality. The overall aim is to avoid the loss of natural habitat in Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) and prevent the degradation of Ecological Support Areas (ESAs), while encouraging sustainable development in Other Natural Areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Albuca Spiralis
    Flowering Plants of Africa A magazine containing colour plates with descriptions of flowering plants of Africa and neighbouring islands Edited by G. Germishuizen with assistance of E. du Plessis and G.S. Condy Volume 62 Pretoria 2011 Editorial Board A. Nicholas University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, RSA D.A. Snijman South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, RSA Referees and other co-workers on this volume H.J. Beentje, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK D. Bridson, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK P. Burgoyne, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA J.E. Burrows, Buffelskloof Nature Reserve & Herbarium, Lydenburg, RSA C.L. Craib, Bryanston, RSA G.D. Duncan, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, RSA E. Figueiredo, Department of Plant Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, RSA H.F. Glen, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Durban, RSA P. Goldblatt, Missouri Botanical Garden, St Louis, Missouri, USA G. Goodman-Cron, School of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, RSA D.J. Goyder, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK A. Grobler, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA R.R. Klopper, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA J. Lavranos, Loulé, Portugal S. Liede-Schumann, Department of Plant Systematics, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany J.C. Manning, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, RSA A. Nicholas, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, RSA R.B. Nordenstam, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden B.D. Schrire, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK P. Silveira, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal H. Steyn, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA P. Tilney, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, RSA E.J.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa
    ran Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations GLOBAL FOREST RESOURCES ASSESSMENT COUNTRY REPORTS OUTH FRICA S A FRA2005/004 Rome, 2005 FRA 2005 – Country Report 004 SOUTH AFRICA The Forest Resources Assessment Programme Sustainably managed forests have multiple environmental and socio-economic functions important at the global, national and local scales, and play a vital part in sustainable development. Reliable and up- to-date information on the state of forest resources - not only on area and area change, but also on such variables as growing stock, wood and non-wood products, carbon, protected areas, use of forests for recreation and other services, biological diversity and forests’ contribution to national economies - is crucial to support decision-making for policies and programmes in forestry and sustainable development at all levels. FAO, at the request of its member countries, regularly monitors the world’s forests and their management and uses through the Forest Resources Assessment Programme. This country report forms part of the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005 (FRA 2005), which is the most comprehensive assessment to date. More than 800 people have been involved, including 172 national correspondents and their colleagues, an Advisory Group, international experts, FAO staff, consultants and volunteers. Information has been collated from 229 countries and territories for three points in time: 1990, 2000 and 2005. The reporting framework for FRA 2005 is based on the thematic elements of sustainable forest management acknowledged in intergovernmental forest-related fora and includes more than 40 variables related to the extent, condition, uses and values of forest resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Literaturverzeichnis
    Literaturverzeichnis Abaimov, A.P., 2010: Geographical Distribution and Ackerly, D.D., 2009: Evolution, origin and age of Genetics of Siberian Larch Species. In Osawa, A., line ages in the Californian and Mediterranean flo- Zyryanova, O.A., Matsuura, Y., Kajimoto, T. & ras. Journal of Biogeography 36, 1221–1233. Wein, R.W. (eds.), Permafrost Ecosystems. Sibe- Acocks, J.P.H., 1988: Veld Types of South Africa. 3rd rian Larch Forests. Ecological Studies 209, 41–58. Edition. Botanical Research Institute, Pretoria, Abbadie, L., Gignoux, J., Le Roux, X. & Lepage, M. 146 pp. (eds.), 2006: Lamto. Structure, Functioning, and Adam, P., 1990: Saltmarsh Ecology. Cambridge Uni- Dynamics of a Savanna Ecosystem. Ecological Stu- versity Press. Cambridge, 461 pp. dies 179, 415 pp. Adam, P., 1994: Australian Rainforests. Oxford Bio- Abbott, R.J. & Brochmann, C., 2003: History and geography Series No. 6 (Oxford University Press), evolution of the arctic flora: in the footsteps of Eric 308 pp. Hultén. Molecular Ecology 12, 299–313. Adam, P., 1994: Saltmarsh and mangrove. In Groves, Abbott, R.J. & Comes, H.P., 2004: Evolution in the R.H. (ed.), Australian Vegetation. 2nd Edition. Arctic: a phylogeographic analysis of the circu- Cambridge University Press, Melbourne, pp. marctic plant Saxifraga oppositifolia (Purple Saxi- 395–435. frage). New Phytologist 161, 211–224. Adame, M.F., Neil, D., Wright, S.F. & Lovelock, C.E., Abbott, R.J., Chapman, H.M., Crawford, R.M.M. & 2010: Sedimentation within and among mangrove Forbes, D.G., 1995: Molecular diversity and deri- forests along a gradient of geomorphological set- vations of populations of Silene acaulis and Saxi- tings.
    [Show full text]
  • Bmm Whs Nomination Dossier Appendix H: Biodiversity Inventory
    Biodiversity Inventory - Appendix H BMM WHS NOMINATION DOSSIER APPENDIX H: BIODIVERSITY INVENTORY 1 BARBERTON – MAKHONJWA MOUNTAIN LANDS WORLD HERITAGE SITE PROJECT Biodiversity Resource Inventory by Anthony Emery, Marc Stalmans and Tony Ferrar July 2016 Version 1.1 Biodiversity Resource Inventory 2 Biodiversity Resource Inventory: Executive Summary The Biodiversity Resource Inventory forms one of the base documents for the development of the Barberton Makhonjwa Mountains (BMM) World Heritage Site (WHS) nomination dossier to UNESCO. The aim of the document is to summarise and assess the biodiversity found within the BMM WHS. To achieve this currently known biodiversity data has been collated, summarised and mapped, special emphasis has been placed on the features of the local Centre of Plant Endemism and the functioning of ecosystems. These biodiversity data have been assessed according to their conservation status and main ecological threats and trends. These resources will form the bases of providing the main biodiversity attraction for visitors. The BMM WHS is located in the mountainous areas surrounding Barberton through to Badplaas. The Core Area of the BMM WHS is made up of four nature reserves located in an arc from Badplaas through the Nkomazi Wilderness, down the Komati River Valley and into the mountains of the Songimvelo Nature Reserve and the Mountainlands Nature Reserve. This area forms an important conservation corridor between the Kruger National Park and the Highveld and conservation areas within Swaziland. The importance of this area has been highlighted in numerous previous conservation and tourism development initiatives such as the Biodiversity Tourism Corridor and the Songimvelo-Malolotja Transfrontier Conservation Area.
    [Show full text]