JIAC Meetings Wootton Hall, Northampton NN4 0JQ

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

JIAC Meetings Wootton Hall, Northampton NN4 0JQ OFFICE OF THE NORTHAMPTONSHIRE POLICE AND CRIME COMMISSIONER & NORTHAMPTONSHIRE POLICE JOINT INDEPENDENT AUDIT COMMITTEE 10 September 2018 at 10.00am to 13.00pm Greenwell Room, Wootton Hall, Northampton, NN4 0JQ If you should have any queries in respect of this agenda, please contact Helen Jennings on 03000 111 222 Ext 346858 Members of the public, with the permission of the Chair of the Committee, may ask questions of members of the Committee, or may address the Committee, on an item on the public part of the agenda. Further details regarding the process for asking questions or making an address to the Committee are set out at the end of this agenda notice * * * * * Page 1 of 6 Papers AGENDA attached/to Time follow Public Meeting of the Joint Independent Audit Committee 1 Welcome and Apologies for non- attendance JB 10.00 2 Declarations of Interests Members 3 Meeting Log and Actions – 20th July 2018 HK Paper 10:05 Received 4 Update on Fraud Processes RS Paper 10.15 Received 5 Change Programme Update RS Paper 10:35 Received 6 External Audit - Final ISA260 KPMG Verbal 11:05 7 External Audit - Annual Audit Letter KPMG Verbal 8 External Audit Update EY Verbal 9 Internal Audit Progress Report Mazars Paper 11:15 Received 10 Implementation of Internal Audit Recommendations RB Paper 11:25 Received 11 OPCC Risk Register PF Paper 11:35 Received 12 MTFP and Budget Process 2019/20 11:45 a. Medium Term Financial Plan (MTFP) VA Paper Received b. Budget Process 2019/20 VA Paper Received 13 Capital Programme 2018/19 Q1 and Strategy Update HK Paper 11:55 Received 14 Update on MFSS Costs HK Paper 12:05 Received 15 Agenda Plan HK Paper 12:45 Received 16 AOB (Including member updates) JB Verbal 12:55 17 Date and venue of future JIAC meetings Wootton Hall, Northampton NN4 0JQ 10 December 2018 (10:00 to 13:00) 20 March 2019 (10:00 to 13:00) 26 July 2019 (10:00 to 13:00) 30 Sep 2019 (10:00 to 13:00) 11 Dec 2019 (10:00 to 13:00) Page 2 of 6 18 Date and venue of future JIAC workshops i) 20 September 2018 (14:00 to 16:00) Estates Strategy OBB ii) 23 November 2018 (11:00 to 13:00) ICT Developments (national & possibly local) Police & Crime Plan 19 Resolution to exclude the public Items for which the public be excluded from the meeting: In respect of the following items the Chair may move the resolution set out below on the grounds that if the public were present it would be likely that exempt information (information regarded as private for the purposes of the Local Government Act 1972) would be disclosed to them: “That under Section 100A (4) of the Local Government Act 1972, the public be excluded from the meeting for the following items of business on the grounds that if the public were present it would be likely that exempt information under Part 1 of Schedule 12A of the Act of the descriptions against each item would be disclosed to them”. 20 Confidential items – any JB Page 3 of 6 Further details regarding the process for asking questions or making an address to the Committee i. General Members of the public, with the permission of the Chair of the Committee, may ask questions of members of the Committee, or may address the Committee, on an item on the public part of the agenda. ii. Notice of questions and addresses A question may only be asked or an address given if notice has been given by delivering it in writing or by electronic mail to the Monitoring Officer no later than noon two working days before the meeting. Notice of questions or an address to the Committee should be sent to: Helen Jennings Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner East House Police HQ Wootton Hall NORTHAMPTON NN4 0JQ or by email to: [email protected] Each notice of a question must give the name and address of the questioner and must name the person to whom it is to be put, and the nature of the question to be asked. Each notice of an address must give the name and address of the persons who will address the meeting and the purpose of the address. iii. Scope of questions and addresses The Chair of the Committee may reject a question or address if it: • Is not about a matter for which the Committee has a responsibility or which affects Northamptonshire; • is defamatory, frivolous, offensive or vexatious; • is substantially the same as a question which has been put or an address made by some other person at the same meeting of the Committee or at another meeting of the Committee in the past six months; or • requires the disclosure of confidential or exempt information. iv. Asking the question or making the address at the meeting The Chair of the Committee will invite the questioner to put the question to the person named in the notice. Alternatively, the Chair of the Committee will invite an address to the Committee for a period not exceeding three minutes. Every question must be put and answered without discussion but the person to whom the question has been put may decline to answer it or deal with it by a written answer. Every address must be made without discussion. Page 4 of 6 v. The Members of the Committee are: Mr J Beckerleg (Chair of the Committee) Ms G Scoular Mr M Pettitt Mr A Knivett Martin Scoble CHIEF EXECUTIVE & MONITORING OFFICER * * * * * Page 5 of 6 Page 6 of 6 Joint Independent Audit Committee (JIAC) ACTION LOG – 23 JULY 2018 Attendees: Members: John Beckerleg (JB), Gill Scoular (GS), Tony Knivett (TK), Martin Pettitt (MP) Martin Scoble (MS), Helen King (HK), Rachel Swann (RS), Paul Dawkins (PD), Richard Baldwin (RB) Items 9-10 , Andrew Cardoza KPMG (AC), Alasdair Colston (ALC), Brian Welch Mazars (BW), Mark Lunn, Mazars (ML), Vaughan Ashcroft (VA), Nick Alexander (NA), Paul Bullen (PB) Item 13. Two members of the public from the Fire and Rescue Service were present. Agenda Issue Action Responsible Comments 1 Apologies for non- JIAC • Neil Harris (NH), EY attendance members 2 Declarations of Nil Members • MP disclosed his daughter’s partner is a Chief Interests Superintendent within the Force. This supplements the annual disclosure he makes that his daughter works for the Force HR. • JB had accepted the role of treasurer for Milton Keynes Museum but did not perceive a conflict of interest. 3 Meeting Log and • OPCC HR Policies – OPCC Director of CFO • The Committee considered the meeting log and action Actions – 19 March Early Intervention to update JIAC of notes previously shared with members. Points arising 2018 timescales.(OPCC Director NM) were: • Update August 2018: HR Policies are • Item 11 – JB asked for an update on OPCC HR out for consultation and consultation policies which the March paper has indicated were ends 10/9/18. imminent to go through consultation. HK advised that the PCC had required other priorities to take place and the relevant Director had recently updated the Page 1 of 9 • As per March 2018 actions, post Final PCC and Directors that the HR policies will be Accounts, book a Prudential Code consulted on shortly. Meeting. (HK) • Item 15 - March meeting actions highlighted a • Update August 18: Securing dates meeting on the Prudential Code to take place post with diaries and holidays has been final accounts with GS and MP. MP advised he raised difficult not all original attendees may a question at the March 2018 meeting and asked be accommodated. whether the prudential indicators had been calculated in accordance with the latest Prudential Guidelines. He was advised they had. • MP advised he believed the July meeting had been promised a draft Capital Strategy. HK advised that a Capital Update was on the September meeting work plan which is on the agenda. • JB introduced the JIAC annual report and thanked 4 JIAC Annual Chair • Members to meet for an hour before the members and officers for their contribution, advising Report 2017/18 workshop on the 20 September 2018 to that in his view over the last 12 months, governance discuss and determine the level of detail had significantly improved. they should be involved in when seeking to gain assurance (JB). • JB invited members to reflect on the Terms of • Update August 2018: After discussion Reference as he was aware that some JIAC panels with the chair, a meeting has been also considered other areas and to highlight any area requested for members 15 minutes for his discussion with the PCC. before the meeting. • MP requested a discussion on the level of detail of information considered by the JIAC. Other members highlighted the balance between detail and assurance, consequently, the JIAC felt this was a discussion for JIAC members to have at the beginning of the next workshop. • To illustrate his point, MP expressed a view that the HMIC report gave rather less overall assurance regarding progress than previous formats. • MP highlighted his view of the continued lack of transparency around the Wootton Hall decision. Page 2 of 9 • JB will be presenting the report to the Police and Crime Panel at their September meeting. 5 Statement of • Summary of accounting treatment for Helen • JB acknowledged and thanked the finance team, Accounts 2017/18: Voice (Subsidiary or Associate; trading King/Paul auditors and officers for the hard work in the company or not) to be provided to JB Dawkins producing the accounts within the shortened • Statement of (NA) (including the CIPFA guidance) timescale.
Recommended publications
  • Pytchley Neighbourhood Plan May2018.Pages
    Pytchley Parish Council Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan 2018 – 2031 Pre-Submission Version May 2018 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – pre-submission Foreword The attached Neighbourhood Plan is an important document that affects all members of the community of Pytchley. It provides the village with a document that outlines the requirements for future development within the village during the next 30 years with regard to planning and land use. The development of a Neighbourhood Plan by local communities became possible with the introduction of The Localism Act 2011, which gives new rights and powers to communities and individuals. It specifically allows local communities to develop and adopt Neighbourhood Plans, which will become a statutory part of the development plan. In 2016, the Pytchley Parish Council committed to setting up a working group - the Pytchley Neighbourhood Plan Working Group - to develop the plan in accordance with the legal requirements and with the consultation of the local community. Alan Lodge was appointed the working group leader and four members volunteered to assist him, three members from the Parish Council and one member co-opted from the community. The working group remit was to produce a written plan ensuring that all the legislative procedures are adhered to and that the wishes of the community are taken into consideration. The Parish Council would be fully informed and would approve all stages of the plans development. So, what is a Neighbourhood Plan? As stated before, it is a document that defines any issues dealing with ‘Land Development’. In other words, it will only address issues that would normally be passed to the Local Council Planning Department.
    [Show full text]
  • Premises, Sites Etc Within 30 Miles of Harrington Museum Used for Military Purposes in the 20Th Century
    Premises, Sites etc within 30 miles of Harrington Museum used for Military Purposes in the 20th Century The following listing attempts to identify those premises and sites that were used for military purposes during the 20th Century. The listing is very much a works in progress document so if you are aware of any other sites or premises within 30 miles of Harrington, Northamptonshire, then we would very much appreciate receiving details of them. Similarly if you spot any errors, or have further information on those premises/sites that are listed then we would be pleased to hear from you. Please use the reporting sheets at the end of this document and send or email to the Carpetbagger Aviation Museum, Sunnyvale Farm, Harrington, Northampton, NN6 9PF, [email protected] We hope that you find this document of interest. Village/ Town Name of Location / Address Distance to Period used Use Premises Museum Abthorpe SP 646 464 34.8 km World War 2 ANTI AIRCRAFT SEARCHLIGHT BATTERY Northamptonshire The site of a World War II searchlight battery. The site is known to have had a generator and Nissen huts. It was probably constructed between 1939 and 1945 but the site had been destroyed by the time of the Defence of Britain survey. Ailsworth Manor House Cambridgeshire World War 2 HOME GUARD STORE A Company of the 2nd (Peterborough) Battalion Northamptonshire Home Guard used two rooms and a cellar for a company store at the Manor House at Ailsworth Alconbury RAF Alconbury TL 211 767 44.3 km 1938 - 1995 AIRFIELD Huntingdonshire It was previously named 'RAF Abbots Ripton' from 1938 to 9 September 1942 while under RAF Bomber Command control.
    [Show full text]
  • Pytchley Endowed Church of England Primary School High Street, Pytchley, Kettering, Northamptonshire NN14 1EN
    School report Pytchley Endowed Church of England Primary School High Street, Pytchley, Kettering, Northamptonshire NN14 1EN Inspection dates 18–19 April 2018 Overall effectiveness Good Effectiveness of leadership and management Good Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good Outcomes for pupils Good Early years provision Good Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Not previously inspected Summary of key findings for parents and pupils This is a good school Leaders and governors have developed a Pupils have a good understanding of the role of strong school ethos that is shared by pupils democracy through the appointment of the and staff and valued by parents. school council. They have high expectations of their representatives. Leaders have accurately evaluated the strengths and areas for development in the Pupils’ behaviour is good in and out of class. school. They have taken effective action to Pupils take responsibility for the organisation of improve standards. activities for younger pupils and putting chairs away after lunch, for example. The school has a strong culture of inclusion. It warmly welcomes all pupils and provides a The attainment and progress of pupils currently caring and nurturing setting. in the school are in line with or above the national expectations for their age. Trustees have a thorough understanding of the school’s strengths and areas for development. Children leave the early years well prepared for They provide leaders and governors with Year 1. A high proportion of children make appropriate challenge and support. good progress in English and mathematics and achieve a good level of development.
    [Show full text]
  • Orlingbury Character Appraisal
    ORLINGBURY CONSERVATION AREA CHARACTER APPRAISAL 1. ORIGINS AND DEVELOPMENT 1.1 Orlingbury Village is located 4 miles west-north-west of Wellingborough, 4 miles from Kettering and 10 miles from Northampton. The roughly rectangular parish lies between two east-flowing tributaries of the River Ise; the higher land in the west between 107m and 137m AOD, and the central ridge which runs east-west, are covered by Boulder Clay, but the down-cutting of the two streams to the north and south has exposed bands of Great Oolite Limestone, clays, silts, and limestone of the Estuarine Series, Northampton Sand and Upper Lias Clay.¹ The village of Orlingbury itself, in the north- east corner of the parish, lies at 101m AOD, whilst in the south east the ground falls rapidly and is only 68m AOD at the parish boundary on the Orlingbury – Little Harrowden road. 1.2 The etymology of the place name is consistent with this topography as it is thought to derive from “Ordla’s Hill” with connective “ing”. However, the multiplicity of variant forms makes the second element uncertain, evolving from Ordinbaro (1086) through Orlingberg(a) (1131), Horlingbere (1203), Orlibergh (1388) to Orlibeare in 1631.² 1.3 Fairly remote from any significant routes or towns, Orlingbury appears to have been relatively unaffected by the Industrial Revolution of the 18th century. Bridges, in 1753, records it as having about 50 families and census returns in the 19th century showed a stable population of between 250 and 350 persons. Whellan notes employment in 1874 as comprising: grocer/baker wheelwright/carpenter 2 shoemakers brick maker school mistress blacksmith Rector and 3 farmers/graziers farm bailiff With the possible exception of the shoemakers, therefore, employment was clearly subsistence-based.
    [Show full text]
  • Pytchley Proposal Full Application: Erection of 1 Wind Turbine with Ancillary Control House and Transformer Compound Applicant Glanmoor Investments Limited
    BOROUGH OF KETTERING Committee Full Planning Committee - 02/07/2013 Item No: 5.1 Report Peter Chaplin Application No: Originator Development Manager KET/2011/0416 Wards Slade Affected Location Broughton Road (land north of), Pytchley Proposal Full Application: Erection of 1 wind turbine with ancillary control house and transformer compound Applicant Glanmoor Investments Limited 1. PURPOSE OF REPORT • To describe the above proposals • To identify and report on the issues arising from it • To state a recommendation on the application 2. RECOMMENDATION THE DEVELOPMENT CONTROL MANAGER RECOMMENDS that this application be REFUSED for the following reason(s):- 1. The proposed turbine would be an alien feature in an open countryside setting and as such would have an unacceptable adverse impact on the character and visual amenity of the area in conflict with the aims and objectives of Policy 7 of the Local Plan for Kettering Borough; criteria (h) (i) and (o) of Policy 13 of the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy, and paragraph 17 of the National Planning Policy Framework. 2. By reason of its location, size and moving parts its appearance would seriously detract from the cultural and historic significance and setting of the Grade II* listed Church of St Andrew in Broughton, contrary to the aims and objectives of criteria (h) (i) and (o) of Policy 13 of the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy and Policy 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework. Justification for Granting Planning Permission Not applicable Officers Report 3.0 Information Relevant Planning History KET/2011/0174 (Screening Opinion) – Wind turbine - Not EIA development 18/04/2011 Site Description The site comprises an arable field set in open countryside and is located on rising ground towards the head of a small valley running in a north-west to south-east direction, with a more elevated ridge to the south and higher land to the north-west.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the North Northamptonshire Joint Committee
    Report to the North Northamptonshire Joint Committee by Nigel Payne BSc (Hons), Dip TP, MRTPI, MCMI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Date 22 June 2016 PLANNING AND COMPULSORY PURCHASE ACT 2004 (AS AMENDED) SECTION 20 REPORT ON THE EXAMINATION INTO THE NORTH NORTHAMPTONSHIRE JOINT CORE STRATEGY LOCAL PLAN Document submitted for examination on 31 July 2015 Examination hearings held between 17 and 27 November 2015 File Ref: PINS/G2815/429/1 Abbreviations Used in this Report AA Appropriate Assessment CSS Core Spatial Strategy DtC Duty to Co-operate EA Environment Agency GIDP Green Infrastructure Delivery Plan HE Highways England HMA Housing Market Area HRA Habitats Regulations Assessment IDP Infrastructure Delivery Plan JCS Joint Core Strategy JPU Joint Planning Unit LDS Local Development Scheme LP Local Plan LPA Local Planning Authority MM Main Modification NCC Northamptonshire County Council NE Natural England NPPF National Planning Policy Framework NTP Northamptonshire Transport Plan OAN Objectively Assessed Need SA Sustainability Appraisal SCG Statement of Common Ground SCI Statement of Community Involvement SEA Strategic Environmental Assessment SHLAA Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment SHMA Strategic Housing Market Assessment SPA Special Protection Area SPD Supplementary Planning Document SUE Sustainable Urban Extension VS Viability Study -2- North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy Local Plan, Inspector’s Report June 2016 Non-Technical Summary This report concludes that the North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy Local Plan (Part 1) (JCS) provides an appropriate basis for the planning of the area, providing a number of main modifications are made to the plan. The Joint Planning Unit (JPU) has specifically requested me to recommend any modifications necessary to enable the plan to be adopted.
    [Show full text]
  • Pytchley Neighbourhood Plan Working Group - to Develop the Plan in Accordance with the Legal Requirements and with the Consultation of the Local Community
    Pytchley Parish Council Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan 2018 – 2031 Pre-Submission Version Feb 2020 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission Foreword The attached Neighbourhood Plan is an important document that affects all members of the community of Pytchley. It provides the village with a document that outlines the requirements for future development within the village during the next 30 years with regard to planning and land use. The development of a Neighbourhood Plan by local communities became possible with the introduction of The Localism Act 2011, which gives new rights and powers to communities and individuals. It specifically allows local communities to develop and adopt Neighbourhood Plans, which will become a statutory part of the development plan. In 2016, the Pytchley Parish Council committed to setting up a working group - the Pytchley Neighbourhood Plan Working Group - to develop the plan in accordance with the legal requirements and with the consultation of the local community. Alan Lodge was appointed the working group leader and four members volunteered to assist him, three members from the Parish Council and one member co-opted from the community. The working group remit was to produce a written plan ensuring that all the legislative procedures are adhered to and that the wishes of the community are taken into consideration. The Parish Council would be fully informed and would approve all stages of the plans development. So, what is a Neighbourhood Plan? As stated before, it is a document that defines any issues dealing with ‘Land Development’. In other words, it will only address issues that would normally be passed to the Local Council Planning Department.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Neighbourhood Plan Version 2 2018 09 01
    Pytchley Parish Council Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan - DRAFT 2017 – 2031 Pre-Submission Version Jan 2018 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-Submission Foreword The attached Neighbourhood Plan is an important document that affects all members of the community of Pytchley. It provides the village with a reference document that outlines the requirements for future development with the village during the next 30 years with regard to planning and land use. The development of a Neighbourhood Plan by local communities became possible with the introduction of The Localism Act 2011, which gives new rights and powers to communities and individuals. It specifically allows local communitiesDRAFT to develop and adopt Neighbourhood Plans, which will be legally binding on local councils. In 2016 the Pytchley Parish Council committed to setting up a working group - the Pytchley Neighbourhood Plan Working Group - to develop the plan in accordance with the legal requirements and with the consultation of the local community. Alan Lodge was appointed the working group leader and four members volunteered to assist him, three members from the Parish Council and one member co-opted from the community. The working group remit was to produce a written plan ensuring that all the legislative procedures are adhered to and that the wishes of the community are taken into consideration. The Parish Council would be fully informed and would approve all stages of the plans development. So, what is a Neighbourhood Plan? As stated before, it is a document that defines any issues dealing with ‘Land Development’. In other words it will only address issues that would normally be passed to the Local Council Planning Department.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTHAMPTONSHIRE. [XELLY's PUBLICAN8--Continued
    668 PUB NORTHAMPTONSHIRE. [XELLY'S PUBLICAN8--COntinued. Queen's Head, William Johnson, Bulwick, Wansford New Inn hotel, Jesse Cowper Pearson, Sheep st. Kettering Queen's Head, Mrs. Hannah Lamb, Higbam Ferrers New inn, Thomas Perkins, Rushden, Higham Ferrers Queen's Head, 'Villiam ManD, "\\'ilbarston, Market Harboro' New inn, }<'rederick James Steward, Brigstock, Thrapston Queen's Head, James Moorby, Nassington, Wansford New inn, Richard Taylor, Middleton Cheney, Banbury Queen's Head, James Perrin, 14 Gold street, Northampton New inn, John Thompson, Norton Locks, Norton Queen's Head, Joseph Wagstaff, Road Weedon - New inn, Herbert Wade, Lincoln I'd. Millfield, Peterborough Race Horse inn, Wm. Dinnes. I.C; Abington sq. Northamptn New inn, Frederick Yoting, Rothwell, Kettering Railway hotel, Wm. Butterworth, Helpstone,l\1arkt.Deeping New White Horse, James Spence, 22 High street, Kettering Railway hotel, Albert Coleman, Earls Barton, Northampton Northampton Arms, Hy.Marson,YardleyHastings,Nrthmptn Railwa;y Hotel, Mrs. Eliza Rhimes, Ashton, Oundle Oak, James Robinson, Middleton Cheney, Banbury Railway inn, J onah Groome, lrthlingboro', Higham Ferl'ers Oakley (The), Wm. Hy. Lovell, Rushden, Higham Ferrers Railway inn, Arthur Neaverson, Peakirk, Market Deeping Old Artichoke, Harry Cockerill, Moulton, Northampton Railway inn, Joseph Nunley, jun. Raunds, Thrapston Old Black Lion, Alfd. 13. Allinson, I Black Lion hI. Nrthmptn Railway inn, George Sail, Kilsby, Rugby Old Blue Bell, William J. Brown, Moulton, Northampton Railway inn, John Whitwell, 31 Westwood st. Peterborough Old Crown, Zachariah Foster, Barby, Rugby Ram hotel, George Barris, Sheep street, Northampton Old Crown, George Shakeshaft, Ashton, Towcester Ram Hotel vaults, George Harris, Bearward st. Northmptn Old Crown, Abrabam Watts, Upper Weedon Ranelagh (The), Edward Warwick, Mill rd.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Persons Nominated
    STATEMENT OF PERSONS NOMINATED North Northamptonshire Election of Town Councillors The following is a statement of the persons nominated for election as a Town Councillor for Kettering Town Council All Saints Ward Reason why no Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) longer nominated* BALMER (address in North Labour Party Adam Northamptonshire) BROGAN 2 Canon Street, Kettering, Alliance for Democracy and Suzanne NN16 8RE Freedom BYATT 156 Regent Street, Kettering, Labour Party Andy NN16 8QH FEDOROWYCZ (address in North Green Party Emily-Rose Northamptonshire) PETTIT (address in North Labour Party Jane Northamptonshire) SHIPTON 71 Northfield Avenue, Conservative Party Jack Francis Kettering, Northants, NN16 Candidate 9HU THURLAND 98 Britannia Road, Kettering, Conservative Party Kevin Nigel Northants, NN16 9RZ Candidate TITCOMBE 14 Mitchell Street, Kettering, Conservative Party Greg Northants, NN16 9HA Candidate TOWNS 34 Burghley Street, Green Party James Kettering, NN16 9LQ TUBBS 136 Rockingham Road, Green Party Sarah Kettering, NN16 9AG *Decision of the Returning Officer that the nomination is invalid or other reason why a person nominated no longer stands nominated. The persons above against whose name no entry is made in the last column have been and stand validly nominated. Dated Friday 9 April 2021 Rob Bridge Returning Officer Printed and published by the Returning Officer, Municipal Offices, Bowling Green Road, Kettering, NN15 7QX STATEMENT OF PERSONS NOMINATED North Northamptonshire Election of Town Councillors The following
    [Show full text]
  • Download (11Mb)
    University of Warwick institutional repository: http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap/36273 This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. Gender and Technology in the East Midlands Boot and Shoe Industry: 1850-1911 Jill Greenfield Submitted for the degree of PhD, Centre for the Study of Women and Gender, University of Warwick. March 1998. 1 Acknowledgements Firstly I wish to express my thanks to my supervisor Maxine Berg, particularly for sticking by me at times when things were not progressing smoothly. My thanks are also due to Terry Lovell, Director of the Centre for the Study of Women and Gender. Terry's sage advice and her ability to appear calm, perhaps when she did not always feel it, was much appreciated. Also I would like to express my gratitude to various students in both the Centre for the Study of Women and Gender, and in t'.e Centre for the Study of Social History at Warwick 'ho \ia'e,, o'er tl'e 'yeam, Oii friendship and stimulating discussion. I am indebted to staff and archivists at Northampton Record Office, Lc)ccster Record Office and various academic and local libraries. I would like to give a special thank-you to the staff at the headquarters of NUFLAT at Earls Barton in Northamptonshire, who over many weeks of research were so kind and helpful - the regular cups of tea were very much appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • School Accessibility Audit
    Pytchley Endowed C.E. Primary School High Street Pytchley Kettering Northants NN14 1EN ACCESS AUDIT Equality Act Audits. Head office London SE20 8DZ Mob: 07885 755618 www.ea-audits.com INTRODUCTION At the request of Julia Havlickova, the Headteacher, I visited Pytchley Endowed Church of England Primary School on 14 December 2016 in order to write their access audit and accessibility plan. (Legislation states that all schools must have these documents and they must be updated every 3 years.) This was my first visit to the school. They are a small school and as such are able to develop a close working relationship both with pupils and parents. The school has a family nature and there is a close-knit atmosphere in this lovely village school. All pupils in the school are encouraged to reach their full potential through the support of all members of staff. The school aims to provide equal opportunities for all. There is access for wheelchair users from both the top of school to the lower level and from the playground to the lower part of school. A disabled toilet is available at the top of school. The school aims to serve its community by providing an education of the highest quality within the context of Christian belief and practice. It encourages an understanding of the meaning and significance of faith, and promotes Christian values through the experience it offers to all its pupils. Situated in the village of Pytchley near Kettering, Pytchley Endowed Church of England Primary School has a historical heritage of which it is very proud.
    [Show full text]