Lawrence Walker Limited Church Farm House Leamington Hastings Warwickshire CV23 8DZ

WALKER ENGINEERING Tel : 01926 632111 Consultants in Highways, Railways Fax : 01926 632340 Bridges and Underwater Engineering Mobile : 07774 839181

E-Mail : [email protected]

Roxhill Developments Limited

A14 Junction 10 Business Park Kettering Northamptonshire

Transport Assessment

September 2013

Lawrence Walker Limited Registered Office as above Registered in England No. 3001314 A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

CONTENTS

Index Page

1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Policy and Planning Background 6 3.0 Proposed Development 18 4.0 Transport Network Review 23 5.0 Traffic Forecasting 39 6.0 Traffic Generation 45 7.0 Highway Impact Assessment 49 8.0 Public Transport Strategy 79 9.0 Pedestrians, Cyclists and the Mobility-Impaired 83 10.0 Summary and Conclusions 85

Figures

A General Location Plan B Local Highway Network C Junction Location Plan D Existing Bus Services E Walking Isochrones F Cycling Catchment Area

1A Transport Strategy: Site Access – Phase 1A 1B Transport Strategy: Site Access – Phase 1B 2A Transport Strategy: Site Access – Phase 2A 2B Transport Strategy: Site Access – Phase 2B 3 Transport Strategy: Site Access – Phase 3

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

Appendices

A Masterplan B TA Scoping Correspondence C Transport Strategy – Highway Layout Plan (THDA) D Accident Data E Assessment Traffic Flows F Trip Generation Calculations G VISSIM Report – Site Access Junctions and A14 Junction 10 H1 Capacity Assessment – Junction 1: A6/A510 Roundabout H2 Capacity Assessment – Junction 2: Kettering Road/Station Road H3 Capacity Assessment – Junction 3: Kettering Road/Altendiez Way H4 Not Used H5 Capacity Assessment – Junction 5: A14J9 H6 Capacity Assessment – Junction 6: Barton Road/Woodland Avenue H7 Capacity Assessment – Junction 7: Barton Road/Cranford Road H8 Capacity Assessment – Junction 8: Barton Road/Warkton Lane H9 Capacity Assessment – Junction 9: Barton Road/St. Botolph’s Road H10 Capacity Assessment – Junction 10: A6003 Barton Road/Windmill Avenue H11 Capacity Assessment – Junction 11: A6003 Barton Road/A509 London Road H12 Capacity Assessment – Junction 12: High Street/Higham Road/Finedon Road H13 Capacity Assessment – Junction 13: A6/Higham Road H14 Capacity Assessment – Junction 14: Warkton Lane/Deeble Road H15 Capacity Assessment – Junction 15: Windmill Avenue/Deeble Road H16 Not Used H17 Capacity Assessment – Junction 17: A509/Findeon Station Road H18 Capacity Assessment – Junction 18: A509/Station Road H19 Capacity Assessment – Junction 19: Station Road/Polwell Lane H20 Capacity Assessment – Junction 20: Polwell Lane/Altendiez Way H21 Capacity Assessment – Junction 21: A4300 Stamford Road/Windmill Avenue H22 Capacity Assessment – Junction 22: Windmill Avenue/St. Mary’s Road

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

Appendices – Contd.

H23 Capacity Assessment – Junction 23: A6003 London Road/Roundhill Road H24 Capacity Assessment – Junction 24: A6003 London Road/Piper’s Hill Road H25 Capacity Assessment – Junction 25: A6003 London Road/Hawthorn Road H26 Capacity Assessment – Junction 26: A14J3, Rothwell

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.01 Lawrence Walker Limited (LWL) is commissioned by Roxhill Developments Limited (Roxhill) to prepare a Transport Assessment (TA) in support of proposals to develop land to the south of A14 Junction 10 at Kettering, Northamptonshire. The site would be developed primarily for Employment Uses (B1, B2 & B8 Use Classes) and is known as the “A14J10 Business Park - Kettering”. Figure A shows the development site in its strategic context, whilst Figure B shows the local area surrounding the site. A preliminary Masterplan is provided at Appendix A.

1.02 The proposed development has significant implications for the adjoining Highway Network, in particular A14 Junction 10 (A14J10) and the proposed connection to the East Kettering Sustainable Urban Extension (SUE) to the north. Accordingly, this Report provides a full Transport Assessment (TA) which is intended to support the Outline Planning Application for the scheme.

1.03 The full scope of the TA was determined in discussion with the relevant Planning and Highway Authorities, who are:-

 The Highways Agency (HA)  Northamptonshire County Council (NCC)  Kettering Borough Council (KBC)

1.04 The discussions have also included NCC’s consultants, MGWSP and the HA’s consultants, AECOM.

Scope

1.05 The main purpose of the TA is to demonstrate to the Planning and Highway Authorities that the scheme could be satisfactorily accommodated on the adjacent transport network.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 1 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

1.06 It seeks to demonstrate that the scheme would not prejudice other committed developments in the area and would instead offer substantial opportunities to improve the operation of the highway network at and in the vicinity of A14J10.

1.07 The process of determining and agreeing the scope of the TA is summarised below:-

 A “Transport Assessment - Scoping Report” was prepared by LWL in August 2011 and was submitted to the Planning and Highway Authorities;

 Responses to the Scoping Report were received from these Authorities in the form of a “Formal Scoping Opinion”, which was prepared by KBC. A copy of this document is provided in Appendix B.

 A meeting of LWL, NCC, the HA, AECOM and MGWSP was held on Monday 21 January 2012 to agree the methodology and base data to be adopted in the TA.

1.08 The TA has been prepared in accordance with the above Scoping exercise and current DfT Guidelines. It considers the impact of the full development at a Design Year of 2021 to accord with the Assessment Year for Phase 1 of the East Kettering SUE, which lies immediately to the north of A14J10.

1.09 The TA identifies the impact of the proposed development on the adjacent transport networks and seeks to demonstrate that the proposed highway and sustainable modes access strategies are appropriate and deliverable. It also demonstrates that the proposed Transport Strategy could accommodate construction of the either the “Cranford Road Link” by the adjacent East Kettering SUE Developer or the consented Cranford Road access.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 2 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

1.10 This TA forms one of a series of documents that address the transport aspects of the scheme. Others in the series will deal with matters such as Departures from Standards, VISSIM Micro-Simulation (A14J10) Road Safety Audits and the site Travel Plan.

Transport Strategy

1.11 The Transport Strategy includes the physical highway access and associated road links that are required to accommodate the proposed development. These are illustrated on Figure 1A. Figure 1B shows how the Roxhill scheme could then accommodate an upgraded East Kettering access from Barton Lane in due course.

1.12 Figures 1B & 2A shows how Figure 1A might be expanded to obviate the need for a Junction 10A (part of the East Kettering SUE access strategy) whilst Figure 3 shows how the Roxhill Transport Strategy could fit in with the construction of a Junction 10A in the future. The additional physical works required to deliver these enhancements would not be implemented by Roxhill. The purpose of Figures 1B, 2A, 2B & 3 is therefore simply to demonstrate upgrade paths are available, utilising either Junction 10A or an expanded Junction 10.

Report Structure

1.13 This Report provides the full Transport Assessment (TA) in support of the proposed Outline Planning Application (OPA) for the site. The TA has been undertaken with regard to the advice contained within the DfT’s “Guidance on Transport Assessments” dated March 2007 and the scoping discussions summarised above. It is structured as follows:-

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 3 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

i) The relevant planning and transportation policies are reviewed;

ii) The proposed development and car parking provision are described and assessed;

iii) A review of the existing transport network in the vicinity of the site is presented, in terms of:-

 The local highway network;  Existing traffic conditions;  Accident records;  Local public transport services and infrastructure;  The pedestrian and cyclist network.

iv) The Assessment Year and traffic flow scenarios considered in the TA are identified;

v) The effect of the development on the adjoining highway network is assessed;

vi) The proposed strategy for providing public transport to serve the site is described;

vii) The proposed strategy to maximise the site’s accessibility by pedestrians, cyclists and the mobility-impaired is described;

viii) Conclusions to the above studies are drawn and the transport network enhancements required to accommodate the proposed development are summarised.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 4 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

1.14 The key conclusions of the Report are as follows:-

 The proposed site access arrangements that make up the Transport Strategy would operate within capacity and would not prejudice the development of the East Kettering SUE on the opposite side of the A14;

 A14 Junction 10 would satisfactorily accommodate the proposed development together with background traffic growth and other committed developments in accordance with the Highways Agency’s Requirements, subject to the further improvements to the entries, rotary and slip roads as proposed in this Report;

 The residual traffic generated by the proposed development would not give rise to adverse impacts on any part of the highway network within the site and TA study area;

 No highway improvements are required to accommodate the proposed development, beyond those that form the Transport Strategy;

 The site would be accessible by a range of sustainable travel modes, subject to the network improvements described in this Report. The proposed strategy would also benefit non-development users of local netowrk.

1.15 Accordingly, this Report is presented for approval to the relevant Highways Authorities, as named above.

1.16 A separate Travel Plan (TP) document outlines the sustainable travel practices that would be promoted at the site and sets modal shift targets for monitoring and review. However, the assumptions made in this TA do not rely on achievement of these targets and therefore reflect a “worst-case” scenario with respect to traffic generation and impacts.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 5 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

2.0 POLICY AND PLANNING BACKGROUND

Existing Planning Consents

2.01 The development site itself is not subject to any extant Planning Consents of significance in terms of traffic generation and remains in agricultural use. On this basis, the TA does not take account of any existing land uses at the site.

2.02 There are several proposed or incomplete development schemes with Planning Consent in the vicinity of the site, whose traffic effects need to be taken into account. The most notable of these is the East Kettering development to the north of the A14 and east of the existing Barton Seagrave built-up area. All committed developments are taken into account within the traffic forecasting work that forms the basis of this TA, as described in Section 5.

East Kettering SUE

2.03 East Kettering is a proposed SUE that will provide up to 5,500 residential dwellings, 11.25 hectares of employment land and district/local centres providing retail facilities, schools and recreational/community uses. Outline Planning Consent (OPC) for the scheme was granted in April 2010 and the Reserved Matters Approval (RMA) process is in progress.

2.04 East Kettering will have several connections with the existing highway network; the nearest to the A14J10 Business Park site being from Barton Road, immediately to the north of A14J10. Phase 1 of the scheme will provide 1,750 of the total dwellings together with proportionate amounts of the complementary land uses and is expected to be complete by 2021. Subsequent phases are required to provide a new grade-separated A14 Junction 10A, to the east of A14J10, and a link to the A43 to the north of the town.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 6 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

2.05 NCC has requested that the TA takes into account Phase 1 of East Kettering and its associated transport and access arrangements as a committed scheme. In addition, the Transport Strategy has been designed to allow connection of the A6 south of the site with the new A14J10A in due course (see Figure 3).

A14 Improvements

2.06 Work on the HA’s scheme to widen the A14 between Junctions 7 and 9 is to commence shortly. The scheme will provide an additional lane in each direction of travel and is expected to be complete by spring 2015. The A14 widening is taken into account as a committed scheme within this TA.

2.07 Other schemes to improve the A14 at key problem locations include the improvements to M1 Junction 19 to the west of Kettering (expected to commence in 2014) and a new route between Huntingdon and Cambridge to the east. The latter scheme is still at the planning stages and is not regarded as a committed scheme. However, neither scheme is expected to have any significant impact on traffic levels in the vicinity of the development site in any event.

A43 Corby Link Road

2.08 The A43 Corby Link Road is a major County Council scheme that will realign the A43 to the south of Corby, thus improving the town’s connection to the A14. The scheme is currently under construction and due for completion in 2014, but is not expected to have any significant impact on traffic levels in the vicinity of the development site.

Relevant Transport Policies

2.09 The key transport-related policies of relevance to the scheme are contained within the following documents:

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 7 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

i) The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF);

ii) Regional Spatial Strategy for the East Midlands (March 2009);

iii) Northamptonshire County Council’s Transport Strategy for Growth (2007);

iv) Northamptonshire Transportation Plan (March 2012);

v) North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy (2007).

2.10 The policy framework relevant to this TA is reviewed below.

The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF)

2.11 The NPPF sets out the Government’s policies for delivering sustainable development through the planning system. Local authorities are required to take these policies into account when formulating local development plans and they are also a material consideration when determining planning applications. The NPPF replaced the series of Planning Policy Guidance (PPG) notes, including PPG13 - Transport.

2.12 The NPPF's over-arching policy theme is that there is a presumption in favour of sustainable development. Local authorities are required to determine planning applications favourably where they accord with the development plan. Where there is no current development plan policy in place, applications should be approved unless any adverse impacts that they are likely to cause would "significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits" when assessed against the NPPF as a whole.

2.13 In the context of transport, the NPPF guides decision makers to apply the following key principles:-

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 8 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

 Encourage development that balances the transport system in favour of sustainable modes, recognising that policies and measures required will vary according to location;

 Encourage solutions that support reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and congestion;

 Provide strategies for the provision of viable infrastructure as required to support sustainable development, working with neighbouring authorities where necessary.

2.14 The NPPF states that all developments generating significant movement should be supported by a Transport Assessment or a Transport Statement. Schemes generating significant movement should also be accompanied by a Travel Plan. Plans and decisions should then take account of whether:

 Opportunities for sustainable transport have been taken up as a means of reducing infrastructure requirements;

 Safe and sustainable access can be provided for all;

 Improvements can be undertaken within the transport network, which would cost-effectively limit the significant impacts of the scheme.

2.15 The NPPF states clearly that development should only be refused or prevented where the residual cumulative impacts of the scheme are severe.

2.16 As in previous national guidance, there is a requirement to ensure that development generating significant demand for travel is located where it can be accessed by sustainable travel modes. Priority should be given to walking, cycling and public transport and conflicts between vehicles and vulnerable road users should be minimised through effective layout design.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 9 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

2.17 Having regard to the above objectives, the proposed site access strategy includes measures to connect the site with the adjacent community and sustainable travel network. The TA considers the accessibility of the site by all modes and proposes an access strategy that seek to maximise the opportunities to use sustainable modes such as public transport, walking and cycling.

Northamptonshire County Council’s Transport Strategy for Growth

2.18 Chapter 2 of the above document identifies growth as a key objective for Northamptonshire in the context of the Milton Keynes and South Midlands (MKSM) sub-regional development area.

2.19 North Northamptonshire, which comprises the area covered by Corby, Kettering, Wellingborough and East Northamptonshire councils, is identified as a key component of this growth by providing over 66,000 of the 200,000 new dwellings to be delivered in the MKSM by 2026. This is expected to give rise to a significant population increase in the North Northamptonshire area and to generate a target increase of over 40,000 jobs by 2021.

2.20 A transport network that can meet the challenges of a growing economy and the increasing demand for travel, whilst also achieving Governmental environmental objectives, is therefore required for the area. Development proposals must therefore encourage the use of sustainable modes of travel and enhance existing accessibility.

Northamptonshire Transportation Plan

2.21 Northamptonshire's third Local Transport Plan (LTP3) “The Northamptonshire Transport Plan”, was published in March 2012 and replaced the previous Interim Third Local Transport Plan. The Northamptonshire Transport Plan sets out the County’s transport policies, objectives and vision up to 2026.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 10 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

2.22 The Plan considers the level of funding that is likely to be available for delivery of the various policy measures over the coming years and of the likely future demands that development will place upon the transport network. It that acknowledges growth will continue to place major pressures on the transport system and states that funding, at least over the next few years, will be limited.

2.23 The Northamptonshire Transportation Plan comprises an overarching strategy document supplemented by a series of themed documents. The suite of documents includes strategies or plans covering a range of transport themes and provides detailed strategies or plans for Northamptonshire’s main towns.

2.24 The following key strategic policies are relevant to the proposed development:

i) Strategic Policy 2 - supports the introduction of effective and attractive sustainable transport options that will encourage lasting modal shift in Northamptonshire. Two targets for modal shift, based on 2001 Census journey to work data, to achieve by 2031 have been set:

 A reduction of 5% in single occupancy car journeys to work from the existing built up areas of the towns;

 A reduction of 20% in single occupancy car journeys to work from new developments.

ii) Strategic Policy 3 – seeks to ensure that all new developments are well connected by public transport and walking, cycling and motor vehicle routes and to the existing public transport network or one that can be created. This will allow ease of movement between the development and existing built up areas and provide access to employment and key services.

iii) Strategic Policy 4 – states that where it is appropriate and cost-effective to do so, NCC will seek funding to reduce congestion and improve access and connectivity through targeted investment in the road network.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 11 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

iv) Strategic Policy 6 – states that NCC will work with the local planning authorities to influence their Local Development Frameworks and thus minimise the adverse impacts of development on the transport network. Opportunities will be sought to create more sustainable travel options for new developments.

v) Strategic Policy 7 – states that NCC will work with partners from the public and private sectors to identify and deliver the transport infrastructure requirements of the Local Development Frameworks, as identified in the supporting Infrastructure Delivery Plans and associated infrastructure schedules.

vi) Strategic Policy 8 – seeks to ensure that operational plans for new developments do not widen inequalities in health.

vii) Strategic Policy 14 - states that NCC will work with partners to improve the walking, cycling and public transport infrastructure in order to make options available for people to travel in Northamptonshire.

viii) Strategic Policy 15 – States that NCC will seek to improve accessibility to employment and services such as healthcare, leisure and education for all people of Northamptonshire, including those who, for whatever reason, have access to a limited range of transport modes.

ix) Strategic Policy 16 – seeks to utilise innovative, effective and efficient methods to inform people about the choices that are available for them when making a journey.

x) Strategic Policy 18 – states that NCC will aim to improve the highway infrastructure and transport network in the county to provide better access to jobs and training for the people living and working in Northamptonshire.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 12 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

xi) Strategic Policy 19 – seeks to improve journey times and reliability on the highway and rail networks in order to increase the efficiency of freight movements and facilitate local economic growth.

xii) Strategic Policy 20 – related to the above, states that NCC will work closely with the Highways Agency (HA) and will seek to harmonise with policies relating to the strategic road and rail networks.

xiii) Strategic Policy 21 – seeks to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide by making lower-carbon modes more attractive and improving the efficiency of the road and rail networks.

xiv) Strategic Policy 22 - seeks to reduce the impact of motor vehicles on the local environment in Northamptonshire by minimising the effects of severance, noise and the emissions from transport.

xv) Strategic Policy 24 – states that highway infrastructure will be designed to increase accessibility through effective streetscapes which recognise both the place and movement functions of each street and by minimising street signage clutter.

2.25 Other than the Corby Link Road scheme as described above, the Plan does not identify any specific major schemes in the locality of the proposed development, but refers to the HA’s proposals to widen the A14 between Junctions 7 and 9 at Kettering.

2.26 The development addresses travel choice through provision of access to bus services, walking and cycling infrastructure and a Travel Plan (TP) which seeks to raise the opportunities for travel other than by motor vehicle.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 13 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy

2.27 Corby, Kettering, Wellingborough and East Northamptonshire Councils, together with NCC have formed a Joint Planning Unit (JPU) to develop a set of strategic planning objectives for the Sub-Region. The JPU has been responsible for producing the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy (CSS) which was formally adopted in August 2008.

2.28 The CSS categorises Kettering as one of the three ‘Growth Towns’, which are to provide the focus for major co-ordinated growth and regeneration.

2.29 Underpinning this growth will be improved transport choice and linkages between neighbouring towns (see Policy 1 below) and links to the urban core (see Policy 9 below). Key policies impacting on transport include:

 Policy 1: seeks to achieve greater self-efficiency for North Northamptonshire with development principally directed towards the urban core, focused on the three “Growth Towns” of Corby, Kettering and Wellingborough. Improvements to the public transport will seek to link the main growth centres with their wider hinterland.

 Policy 2: identifies key transport infrastructure upgrades and facilities to strengthen and enhance connections with surrounding areas. Measures of potential relevance to the developments proposals include provision of additional capacity on Midland Main Line (MML) rail services, provision of express coach services utilising the A14 corridor and a sub-regional bus network. Priorities for investment include improvements to the A14 around Kettering.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 14 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

 Policy 3: focuses on connections within the urban core including the need for improved, more frequent bus services between the towns and smaller settlements. Proposals for centrally located bus interchanges are identified and promoted at Corby, Kettering, Wellingborough and Rushden. These will act as the focus for bus and coach services along with multi-modal interchanges at the three rail stations in the Growth Towns. The Policy also highlights that road infrastructure associated with developments should, where possible, strengthen connections between settlements.

 Policy 4: is concerned with enhancing local connections, particularly between the rural hinterlands of North Northamptonshire and their most accessible service centres and also within urban areas. The strategy includes improving the strategic and local bus network; park-and-ride; demand responsive transport to fill key gaps in the scheduled network; walking and cycling networks; and town centre transport strategies.

 Policy 6: identifies that new development will be supported by the timely delivery of infrastructure, services and facilities necessary to provide balanced, more self-sufficient communities and to secure a modal shift away from car use and road freight haulage. Development is to be phased in relation to the delivery of infrastructure and/or performance against targets to reduce demands on existing infrastructure. Contributions are to be sought towards the provision of the local and strategic infrastructure required to serve new development.

2.30 The proposed development seeks to address the relevant CSS policies by providing an appropriate access strategy that also facilitates cycling and walking. The site is also well reasonably well-connected to the public transport network as shown elsewhere in this report.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 15 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

Summary and Appraisal

2.31 A summary of the policy issues to be taken into account within the TA is presented in the following paragraphs.

2.32 The proposed Transport Strategy would enhance the efficiency of the highway network in the vicinity of A14J10 and would therefore be in accordance with national, regional and local policies, particularly those relating to freight-generating development.

2.33 Kettering is identified in the North Northamptonshire CSS as a “Growth Town” for future sustainable growth and employment development. The site is in a suitable location for this type of employment. It enjoys excellent access from the national strategic highway network for freight traffic, via the A14, which thereby minimises the scope for conflicts with the local environment. Subject to achieving satisfactory accessibility by non-car modes, it would also be well-connected to the local labour market in Burton Latimer, Barton Seagrave, East Kettering SUE and the surrounding areas.

2.34 Regional and local planning policies clearly indicate the need to ensure accessibility to new development by pedestrians, cyclists and public transport. This will require the Developer to provide access to bus services and pedestrian/cyclist links to established corridors. The TA therefore demonstrates how the site could be served by public transport and how it would be integrated with the existing and proposed pedestrian and cycle networks.

2.35 Local policies indicate a potential requirement for off-site highway improvements to ensure that additional traffic can be accommodated without adverse impact. The need for and nature of any such improvements are tested in this TA.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 16 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

2.36 The LTP does not identify any significant specific schemes to be implemented in the vicinity of the development site, but re-emphasises the need to ensure that development is accessible by a range of non-car modes and contributes to LTP objectives. The LTP does, however, emphasise the need to secure an efficient highway network.

2.37 There is a requirement for a Travel Plan for the site. This forms a separate but complementary document to the TA.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 17 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

3.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

Land Uses

3.01 The site Masterplan (Appendix A) shows a net developable site area of 25.4 hectares, with a further 4.1 hectares of land beyond the application site boundary reserved for future development.

3.02 Employment uses would account for the majority of the scheme, the remainder (the western-most development plot) being identified for development as a Pub/Hotel or Roadside Services. For the purpose of this TA, a Petrol Filling Station (PFS) has been assumed, as this will provide the worst-case scenario in terms of the number of trips attracted.

3.03 Assuming an average building density of 40% across the site, the scheme would yield approximately 128,000 m2 of employment floor space, comprising B1a, B1b/B2 and B2/B8 development. Whilst the majority of the scheme may well comprise any one of the three land use classes, a mix of employment land uses has been assumed in this TA to maintain flexibility.

3.04 For the purposes of assessment only, the TA is based on the mix of employment development as summarised in Table 3.1 below:-

Table 3.1: Schedule of Proposed Employment Development as Assessed in TA Land Use Gross Floor Area* B1a (Office) 21,101m2 B1c 3,146 m2 B2 25,142 m2 B8 71,654m2 TOTAL 121,043m2

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 18 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

3.05 The above total quantum and mix of development was agreed with NCC and KBC in February 2013 and is now slightly different to the current Masterplan. However, it should be noted that the Planning Application does not include the development of land at the eastern-most end of the scheme (Plot H as shown on the Masterplan) which therefore does not need to be assessed at this time.

3.06 Once the development of Plot H is excluded, the total GFA for which planning permission is ought at this time reduces to approximately 108,000m2. On the basis of Table 3.1, the TA thus assesses a greater total Gross Floor Area (GFA) employment uses than is currently proposed, with a heavier weighting towards B1 office uses. In terms of traffic generation, the TA therefore provides a robust assessment of the scheme and is likely to include Plot H in the greater part should it subsequently come forward.

3.07 On the above basis, the proportion of B1, B2 and B8 development may be varied without further approval, subject to the total site traffic generation not exceeding the level assessed by the TA (see Section 6).

3.08 The Roadside Service Area would account for 1,600m2 (approx.) of the total GFA at the western end of the site. This facility is expected to include a Petrol Filling Station, a Motorists’ Shop and Toilets. It has been assessed in the TA as providing 12 fuelling pumps.

Access Strategy

3.09 The proposed Transport Strategy is fully explained and illustrated on Figure 1A.

3.10 In essence, the access strategy would reduce the number of arms at A14J10 by providing a single link road through the site, which would carry the traffic that currently uses the A6 and Kettering Road arms.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 19 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

3.11 The essence of the scheme is a simple one, in so far as it relies on just three basic principles to deliver a step-change in the capacity available at Junction 10. These principles are:-

i) Removal of all traffic movements between the A6 and Burton Latimer via Kettering Road from A14J10 altogether, through the creation of a Southern Link Road (SLR) to the south of the junction;

ii) Conversion of A14J10 into a four-arm junction, through use of the SLR and a diversion of the A6 through the site. Ignoring U-Turns, this reduces the number of turning conflicts that the junction needs to accommodate from 20 to 12, providing substantial relief;

iii) Widening of the rotary and slip-roads, together with full signalisation to varying degrees in order to provide additional capacity.

3.12 The scheme has been developed to allow phased construction, thereby allowing different development scenarios to be enacted depending upon future needs, as shown on Figures 1B, 2A, 2B & 3. This also allows funding to be provided by different Developers, but does not tie any one to a specific scheme or timescale once Roxhill has provided the first phase. It does not involve any element of ransom, but instead leaves all future options open, just as they would otherwise exist today. It does, however, provide new ones, offering substantial cost savings overall should they be taken forward. The development should therefore be seen as an enabling project for the delivery of the Core Strategy, which is unique amongst contender sites.

3.13 A full capacity assessment of the proposed new infrastructure under Phase 1A (Figure 1A) has been undertaken by the HA’s consultants (AECOM) using their VISSIM model of A14J10 and its approaches.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 20 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

3.14 The VISSIM results are reported separately (See Section 7) and confirm that the proposed scheme will operate within capacity. The VISSIM assessment includes all components of the access strategy including:-

 The A14J10 Rotary;

 The A14 mainline Slip Roads and other approaches;

 The SLR and its roundabout junctions with Kettering Road, the Site Access and Cranford Road;

 The East Kettering access junction with Barton Road, immediately to the north of A14J10.

3.15 The proposed highway arrangements to be provided by Roxhill are shown the layout plans prepared by THDA Consulting Engineers in Appendix C.

On-Site Parking Provision

3.16 The parking arrangements shown on the Masterplan are illustrative, in terms of both their layout and number. The actual number of car parking spaces was initially assessed in accordance with NCC’s “Parking – Supplementary Planning Guidance” document of 2003, as required by their current LTP3 Parking Strategy (January 2013).

3.17 Car parking supply and demand issues have subsequently been assessed in greater detail within the Travel Plan that accompanies this TA, based on the modal split targets that are contained therein. As a result, it is proposed that a total of 1,850 staff car parking spaces will be provided, plus a further 250 parking spaces for visitors. As explained in the TP, this would provide car parking for approximately 75% of employees, based on anticipated employee numbers and shift working arrangements.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 21 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

3.18 The TP proposes that a Parking Management Strategy (PMS) will be implemented throughout the development to ensure that the supply of car parking is effectively and equitably managed, with suitable enforcement measures to prevent abuse.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 22 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

4.0 TRANSPORT NETWORK REVIEW

General Location

4.01 The site is located to the north of Burton Latimer and south of A14J10 and approximately 4km to the south of Kettering town centre. It is bounded to the north by the A14 and comprises some 48 hectares of agricultural land, bisected by the existing A6. It extends southwards towards the Burton Latimer built-up area and eastwards towards Cranford Road. The Latimer Business Park Business Park lies immediately to the west of the site and the proposed development would thus form a natural extension of the existing employment-related land uses in that area.

4.02 The location of the site relative to the local highway network is as shown on Figure B.

Strategic Highway Network

4.03 The focal point of the strategic highway network in the vicinity of the site is the A14J10 Interchange immediately to the north-west of the site, which provides a connection between the following routes:-

 The A14 Trunk Road;  The A6;  The A6003 Barton Road;  Kettering Road.

4.04 Each of these routes and the A14J10 Interchange are described briefly in the following paragraphs.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 23 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

4.05 The A14 is a dual two-lane carriageway all-purpose route with hard strips of variable width. It is the main strategic route linking the West Midlands with Eastern England and the Port of Felixstowe. It also serves as a link to a number of major towns and cities along the route such as Kettering, Cambridge, Newmarket, Bury St. Edmunds and Ipswich.

4.06 A14J10 is a large two-bridge grade-separated roundabout interchange, providing for all turning movements to and from the A14. At present, all entries to the roundabout are priority-controlled. The roundabout is connected to the A14 main line by single-lane slip roads with local widening to two or more lanes at the roundabout entries. The merge and diverge facilities at the A14-end of the slip roads are simple taper layouts, except at the A14 westbound merge where a parallel merge lane and taper is provided.

4.07 The A6 is a single carriageway route that connects A14J10 with Finedon, bypassing Burton Latimer to the east before continuing southwards towards Irthlingborough, Rushden and Luton. It is a strategically-important route in the context of Northamptonshire and the South Midlands region, but is not a trunk road.

4.08 The Burton Latimer bypass section of the A6 is of wide-single carriageway standard with limited access and side-road junctions mostly in the form of ghost- island or single-lane dualled priority junctions. The A6/Cranford Road junction, however, has recently been converted to a roundabout and its approaches are subject to a 40mph speed limit. The remainder of the bypass to the south is subject to the national speed limit of 60mph.

4.09 The A6003 Barton Road connects A14J10 with Kettering town centre. It is a single carriageway route of varying standard and is mostly urban in character. In due course, Barton Road will also provide accesses to the East Kettering SUE to the north of A14J10 and also at the junction with Warkton Lane.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 24 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

4.10 East Kettering is also to deliver a range of junction improvements and bus priority measures along the route towards Kettering town centre.

4.11 Barton Road is subject to a speed limit of 30mph between A14J10 and a point approximately mid-way between Warkton Lane and St Botolph’s Road. A 40mph speed limit then applies as far west as the Wicksteed Park frontage, followed by a 30mph speed limit which comes into force as the road enters Kettering. Stopping is prohibited along the route length between London Road and St Botolph’s Road. The route has varying levels of frontage development, with more frequent private drive-way accesses in the vicinity of Warkton Lane.

4.12 The other strategic highways in the vicinity of the site are:-

 The A509 which connects Kettering with Wellingborough, Northampton and the A45 route. It also intersects with A14J9, some 2km to the west of the site.

 The A6098 Windmill Lane, which provides a link between the A6003 Barton Road and the A43 Kettering Northern Bypass (via the A4300 Stamford Road). It is a single carriageway route and varying standard and mostly urban character where it passes through Kettering to the east of the town centre.

 The A510 at Finedon provides a link between the A6 and the A509 at Wellingborough. It is a single carriageway road of predominantly rural character.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 25 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

Local Highway Network

4.13 The A6 passes through the site from east to west and provides the longest highway frontage. It is a single carriageway road and is subject to the national speed limit (60mph) for much of its length, but this is reduced to 40mph on the approaches to the Cranford Road roundabout junction, at the south-east corner of the site.

4.14 Where it passes through the site, the A6 has a carriageway width of 10.0m with 1.0m wide hardstrips to either side. Grass verges are provided along both sides of the route but there are no existing footways. A lay-by is provided for each direction of travel some 500m to the east of A14J10. There is currently no street lighting on the A6 except on the approaches to the A14J10 and Cranford Road roundabouts. There no frontage accesses of significance and a limited number of side road junctions along the remainder of the Burton Latimer Bypass to the south.

4.15 The A6 has a roundabout junction with Cranford Road at the south-eastern corner of the site. Cranford Road connects the A6 to Burton Latimer to the south- west. To the north-west of the A6, there is a short additional section of Cranford Road connects with the A6 at a single-lane dualled priority junction, but this section is currently severed to vehicular traffic by the A14 to the north and is retained for local and pedestrian/cycle access only. To the south of the A6, Cranford Road is a single carriageway road with a speed limit of 30mph that comes into force a short distance from the bypass. A footway is provided on at least one side throughout the length south of the Season’s Garden Centre access. From this point, the route has an urban character with numerous frontage accesses, to mainly residential properties.

4.16 Cranford Road becomes Church Street as it passes through Burton Latimer and connects with Kettering Road and High Street at a mini-roundabout junction in the village centre.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 26 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

4.17 Kettering Road provides a direct link between A14J10 and Burton Latimer. It is a single carriageway road with a speed limit of 30mph throughout the village built- up area, which rises to the national speed limit north of the roundabout junction with Altendiez Way. Within the village, footways are provided on either side of the carriageway as far as the mini-roundabout junction with Station Road and street lighting is present. To the north of Station Road, at least one footway is provided as far as A14J10. There are few parking restrictions in place and marked on-street parking bays are provided along parts of the carriageway within the village. A “Pelican” crossing is provided immediately north of the Pioneer Avenue junction.

4.18 Station Road is a single carriageway route that connects Kettering Road with the A509 via the Polwell Lane Industrial Estate. Throughout Burton Latimer it has a speed limit of 30mph. The national speed limit of 60mph comes into force on the more rural approach to the A509, to which Station Road connects via a mini- roundabout junction.

4.19 The bridge that carries Station Road across the River Ise is insufficiently wide for two-way traffic and is subject to alternate one-way working controlled by traffic signals. Within the developed area to the east of the bridge, footways are provided on at least one side of the carriageway and street lighting is present. Most sections of the route are subject to some form of parking restriction, which either limit waiting to certain periods of time or prohibit parking entirely.

4.20 Altendiez Way and Polwell Road together provide a link between Kettering Road and Station Road via the Latimer Business Park. The route is mostly of modern single carriageway standard and is subject to a speed limit of 30mph. A foot- cycleway is provided on the southern and eastern side of the carriageway and street lighting is present. There are parking restrictions in place along most parts of the route.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 27 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

4.21 Signal-controlled pedestrian crossings are provided to the north and south of the ghost-island priority junction with Polwell Lane, which itself lies approximately 500m north of Station Road.

4.22 To the west of Altendiez Way, Polwell Lane provides an alternative link across the A14 between Kettering and Burton Latimer.

4.23 With the exception of Altendiez Way, all the above roads have frequent direct accesses and side-road junctions where they pass through Burton Latimer village.

Existing HGV Restrictions

4.24 A number of the local highways in the vicinity of the site are currently subject to restrictions which prohibit vehicles of more than 7.5 tonnes. These include the entire local road network through the village of Burton Latimer and in particular, the Cranford Road and Kettering Road links to the A6 and Altendiez Way respectively. Similar restrictions are in force on the section of Station Road between the River Ise and the A509 and also on Polwell Lane north and west of Altendiez Way.

4.25 HGV’s are therefore effectively prohibited from using any route to the south of the site other than that between A14J10 and the Latimer and Polwell Lane industrial areas (via Kettering Road/Altendiez Way) and the A6. Thus, all HGV movements to and from the site would be via either the A6, SDR or A14J10 and there would be no impact arising from such traffic within the residential areas of Burton Latimer.

Study Area Junctions

4.26 NCC has requested that a total of 27 off-site junctions, including A14J10, are assessed in this TA. The list and locations of these are as shown on Figure C.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 28 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

Existing Traffic Conditions

4.27 General observations of existing traffic conditions have been made during various site visits, although these are cannot be used a guide to the need for assessment or improvement since extensive reconfiguration of the road network is to take place in order to accommodate the East Kettering development.

4.28 In general, however, the network was observed to operate in a satisfactory manner with some modest peak period queues at the A14J10 Slip Roads and other approaches. These observations suggest that most parts of the local highway network are currently operating within capacity.

Accident Records

4.29 Personal Injury Accident (PIA) data has been obtained from NCC for junctions and links at which the development is forecast to give rise to a material increase in traffic flows (as identified in Section 7).

4.30 Those parts of the highway network that are to be modified as part of either the proposed development or East Kettering have not been examined, since in most cases historic records of PIA’s are irrelevant to the future modified layouts that are proposed. The exception to this is the A6/Cranford Road Roundabout, at the eastern end of the proposed SDR. Although this roundabout is to be modified as part of the A14J10 Business Park Transport Strategy, it is known to have been the scene of several fatal and serious accidents; the nature of which will need to be taken into consideration in the design of the required improvements.

4.31 A plan showing the area for which data has been analysed is presented in Appendix E. The area includes other sensitive areas where the development is forecast to materially increase traffic flows have been included in the study area. These include:-

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 29 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

 The A6 Burton Latimer Bypass between and including the junctions with Higham and Cranford Road;

 The Higham Road/High Street/Kettering Road corridor from the A6 junction to the Altendiez Way roundabout;

 The junctions of the A509 with Station Road and Finedon Station Road, to the west of Burton Latimer;

 The A6/A510 roundabout at Finedon, to the south of Burton Latimer;

 The junctions of London Road with Roundhill Road, Piper’s Hill Road and Hawthorn Road, north of Kettering town centre.

4.32 The data obtained covers the 5-year period 01/06/2008 to 31/05/2013. Full details can be found in Appendix D. Table 4.1 below summarises the number of PIA’s over the 5-year period in the study area as a whole, disaggregated by severity.

Table 4.1: Summary of Personal Injury Accidents by Severity Year Slight Serious Fatal Total 2008* 4 2 0 6 2009 3 0 0 3 2010 7 1 1 9 2011 8 1 0 9 2012 7 2 2 11 2013** 1 0 0 1 Total 30 6 3 39

* 6 months only (June-Dec) ** 6 months only (Jan-June)

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 30 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

4.33 Table 4.1 show that a total of 39 PIA’s occurred over the 5-year period, of which 6 (16%) involved serious injury and 3 (8%) involved a fatality. It is notable that 7 (18%) of the all PIAS, including 2 of serious injury, involved a motorcycle. Pedestrian casualties accounted for 4 PIA’s whilst 1 involved a cyclist.

4.34 A summary of the PIA’s by location is provided in Table 4.2.

Table 4.2: Summary of Personal Injury Accidents by Location

5-year total Location Slight Serious Fatal Total

Individual Junctions 1. A6/Cranford Road Roundabout 2 2 1 5 2. A6/A510 Roundabout, Finedon 8 1 0 9 3. A509/Station Road 3 0 0 3 4. A509/Finedon Station Road 1 0 0 1 Links or corridors A6Cranford Rd to Higham Rd 4 2 2 8 Higham Rd/High St/Kettering Rd 7 0 0 7 London Rd, north of Kettering town ctr. 2 0 0 2 Other locations 3 1 0 4 Total 30 6 3 39

4.35 The 3 recorded fatal PIA’s occurred at the following locations:-

 A6/Cranford Road Roundabout. This PIA involved a single vehicle which failed to negotiate the roundabout on approaching it from the south and over-turned.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 31 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

 A6 Burton Latimer Bypass approximately 600m north of the Higham Road junction and involved a collision between a northbound overtaking vehicle and a southbound vehicle.

 A6 Burton Latimer Bypass approximately 400m north of the Higham Road junction, again caused by an overtaking vehicle travelling northbound and colliding with a southbound vehicle.

4.36 In addition to these fatal incidents, 2 of the serious PIA’s also occurred at the A6/Cranford Road Roundabout and 2 on the Burton Latimer Bypass to the south. Of the latter, one also involved overtaking vehicles and the second a pedestrian. Of the two serious PIA’s that occurred at the Cranford Road Roundabout, both involved single vehicles failing to perceive and/or negotiate the Roundabout correctly.

4.37 The above accident history suggests that there are significant road-safety issues at both the A6/Cranford Road Roundabout and on the A6 Burton Latimer Bypass to the south. Together, these two locations account for 13 (33%) of all accidents, 4 (67%) of serious accidents and all of the fatal accidents recorded across the entire study area. Both locations are therefore considered further below.

4.38 In the case of the Cranford Road Roundabout, the nature and severity of accidents suggests that a combination of approach speeds and geometry are contributory factors. Observations made on site confirm that the alignment of the A6 southbound approach in particular is poor. However, the junction is to be enlarged and realigned as part of the SDR scheme, as shown in Appendix D. These works would improve entry path deflection and increase the conspicuousness of the roundabout and can therefore be expected to improve road safety.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 32 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

4.39 The Burton Latimer Bypass to the south of Cranford Road is currently laid out as a wide-single carriageway road with a central white line separating the two traffic streams. It also provides generous forward visibility, which in combination with its width appears to encourage overtaking, a manoeuvre which featured in both fatal and one of the serious PIA’s.

4.40 It is noted that an accident remedial scheme between Higham Road and Cranford Road is in progress. The scheme will provide a continuous hatched area in the centre of the carriageway which will effectively narrow the two running lanes to either side and discourage overtaking. Such measures can be expected to reduce the risk of accidents along this section of the A6.

4.41 Notwithstanding the above, the risk of accidents along this section of the A6 is unlikely to be significantly affected by the proposed development, which is predicted to reduce two-way traffic flows by some 13 vehicles during the AM peak hour and to increase flows by just 20 vehicles during the PM peak hour. Therefore, no specific remedial works are considered necessary to accommodate the proposed development.

4.42 Elsewhere in Burton Latimer, the number of severity of accidents is of less concern. Although a total of 7 PIA’s was recorded on or adjacent to the Higham Road/High Street/Kettering Road corridor through the village, these were spread out along the corridor, mostly occurring at junctions and no specific cluster sites can be identified. All of the PIA’s recorded on this section involved slight injury. The number and severity of accidents is not considered unduly high for a predominantly urban route of this length and does not provide any strong evidence of any road safety issues along the corridor.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 33 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

4.43 A total of 9 PIA’s was recorded at or approaching the A6/A510 Roundabout in Finedon, one of which involved serious injury. The PIA’s involved a range of contributory factors, including low-speed shunt type collisions and turning conflicts, which are typical of the type of accident occurring at roundabout junctions. It is of significance that 4 (44%) of the total, including the serious injury PIA, involved motorcyclists.

4.44 Although the proposed development is forecast to result in an increase in traffic flow on at least one of the A6 approaches to the junction during each peak hour, this would be off-set by reductions in traffic flow on other approaches. The net effect of the scheme would be to reduce total traffic entering the junction by some 72 vehicles during the AM peak hour and to increase it by just 9 vehicles during the PM peak hour. As such, the proposed development is not expected to have any significant adverse impact on road safety at this location.

4.45 The number and severity of accidents at the other locations identified in Table 4.2 is not significant and provides no evidence of any existing road safety issues that would be exacerbated by the proposed development.

Public Transport Network

4.46 The existing public transport network in the vicinity of the site is shown on Figure D. It can be seen that there are existing bus stops on Kettering Road, within approximately 400m (5 minutes) walking distance of the proposed site access. These stops would need to be relocated as part of the site access scheme, but are expected to remain within a comfortable walking distance of the main site access roundabout. Alternative bus stops are available on Barton Road to the north of A14J10.

4.47 Kettering Road itself is not currently served by regular buses, despite the presence of bus stops. However, there is scope for existing services to be diverted to serve the development in due course (see Section 8).

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 34 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

4.48 A summary of the bus services available in the area adjacent to the site is provided in Table 4.3 below:-

Table 4.3: Local Bus Services

Service Frequency Route Summary No. Daytime Evening Sunday Corby-Kettering-Burton Early eves X1 30 mins - Latimer only M. Keynes-N’hampton- 2-hourly Wellingboro’-Kettering- X4 30 mins 1 hour (N’hmptn- Corby-Peterboro’ (limited Corby) stop) Kettering-Rushden- Limited 49/50 30 mins - Bedford service (50)

4.49 The nearest bus service to the site is route X1, which passes the site on the A6. There are a good number of bus services available in the Burton Latimer area and the X4 is potentially accessible within a reasonable walking distance of the site. This service connects with a number of the surrounding residential areas and thus there is the potential for bus services to accommodate a significant proportion of development generated travel subject to appropriate alteration of routes and/or stops. The proposed bus service strategy is discussed in Section 8.

4.50 The National Rail Network can be accessed at Kettering Railway Station, which lies approximately 8.5km from the site and is the nearest point of access to the national railway network. This station lies on the Midland Main Line (MML) railway and is served by East Midlands Trains (EMT) services.

4.51 At least two direct train services per hour operate to/from London on weekdays and Saturdays, with a timetabled journey time of approximately 60 minutes. Sunday services are also available at a slightly reduced frequency.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 35 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

4.52 Kettering Railway Station is staffed and provides a ticket office, waiting room, food/drink outlet, ticket vending machines, information displays, sheltered seating, accessible platforms and toilets.

4.53 Sheltered cycle storage, a taxi rank and car parking facilities are also available. The station can be reached on via the bus routes identified in Table 4.3, which stop within the town centre and thus within walking distance. Access to the railway network is therefore reasonable and, as a result, rail services may be used for trips between the site and the major urban areas throughout the UK.

Pedestrian and Cyclist Network

4.54 In the vicinity of the site, there is currently a single footway of between 1.5m and 2.5m is provided on the west side of Kettering Road, which is continued around the west side of A14J10 to connect with footways on Barton Road to the north.

4.55 Pedestrian movement is encouraged around Burton Latimer village by the presence of well-lit footways. Pedestrian crossings are provided on the Kettering Road/High Street corridor as described previously and there are uncontrolled crossing facilities within the splitter islands of the A14J10 and Altendiez Way roundabouts.

4.56 A surfaced and lit footway along the east side of Kettering Road provides a link between the Altendiez Way and Burton Latimer village centre.

Walk/Cycle Isochrones

4.57 Guidance on preferred maximum walking distances is given in the Chartered Institution of Highways and Transportation (CIHT) document, "Providing for Journeys on Foot" (2000).

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 36 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

4.58 The Guidelines indicate that a walking distance of 400m is acceptable to access local shops, whilst for trips to work and school distances of 1000m are acceptable. A preferred general maximum walking distance of 2000m is identified.

4.59 To assist in assessing the site’s accessibility, 1000m (10-minute) and 2000m walk Isochrones have been prepared on the basis of an assumed walk speed of 4.8kph, as shown on Figure E.

4.60 Figure E shows that the local bus stops and footways on Kettering, as identified previously, are within the above walking distance of the site, thus providing potential for connectivity between the site and the existing network and wider area beyond. Burton Latimer lies within this area and can be reached via either Kettering Road or a public footpath that traverses the site and also connects with the East Kettering site to the north, via an underpass of the A14.

4.61 The previous PPG13 guidance provides advice on cycling journey lengths. Although PPG13 has since been superseded it is still commonly accepted that cycling offers strong potential to substitute for car trips for those journeys under 5km, or those made as part of a multi-modal trip that includes cycling and public transport (especially rail). A 5km distance is equivalent to a typical cycling time of 15 to 20 minutes.

4.62 Figure F shows an Isochrone of the maximum 5km, which is equivalent to a cycling time of approximately 20 minutes (based on an assumed speed of 15kph). It can be seen that the 5km Isochrone covers the majority of Kettering, the neighbouring village of Burton Latimer, East Kettering and the Latimer Business Park. The northern outskirts of Finedon and Wellingborough to the south also lie within this distance.

4.63 The area benefits from gently undulating topography, which would increase the attractiveness of cycling as a mode-of-travel.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 37 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

4.64 The site is therefore accessible by cycle from a significant residential catchments area and cycling therefore offers a potentially attractive mode for a significant proportion of the local workforce.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 38 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

5.0 TRAFFIC FORECSTING

Methodology

5.01 This Section of the Report describes the methodology by which the assessment traffic flows were generated for use in the TA.

5.02 The proposed development is significant in scale and a transport and traffic modelling exercise has therefore been undertaken to deal with issues such as re- assignment, congestion and the cumulative impacts of committed future developments and network improvements.

5.03 In advance of preparing this TA, the scope of the modelling work was discussed extensively between the two Highway Authorities: the HA and NCC. As a result of these discussions, it was established that the following key issues would need to be addressed:-

 The traffic demands on and operation of the proposed Transport Strategy network (Figure 1A) including the SDR, Site Access junctions, A14J10 (Rotary, Slip Roads and Mainline) and the Barton Road access to East Kettering;

 The impact on the A14 corridor and local highway network both in the immediate vicinity of the site and in the wider area beyond.

5.04 The “Transport Strategy” highway network close to the site comprises a series of closely-spaced junctions which influence each other’s operation to a significant degree. In addition to strategic modelling therefore, more localised micro- simulation work was considered appropriate for this part of the proposed highway network.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 39 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

5.05 Overall, the modelling seeks to provide a detailed picture of the development’s transport effects and impacts. The outputs from the modelling have then been used to support more detailed appraisals of key individual junctions, as described in Section 7 of this TA.

5.06 The modelling exercise was based on the following existing transport models:-

 The County Council’s Northamptonshire Strategic Transport Model (NSTM) which covers the whole of Kettering and the rural areas beyond. The NSTM has recently been used to assess the detailed transport requirements for the East Kettering SUE. Its use in the TA for the A14J10 Business Park therefore provides a fully-consistent basis for the assessment of these two major development schemes. The model is managed for NCC by their consultants, MGWSP;

 The HA’s VISSIM micro-simulation model of the A14 Kettering Bypass corridor, which includes A14J10 and its approaches, as well as the East Kettering Access from Barton Road to the north. The model is managed by the HA’s consultants, AECOM.

5.07 Following a review of the models by AECOM and MGWSP it was agreed that the VISSIM model would be used to assess the A14J10 Business Park Transport Strategy highway network around A14J10. It was also agreed that the VISSIM modelling would be based on input traffic flows obtained from the NSTM (see below).

5.08 In terms of the NSTM, it was agreed that the pre-existing set of flows used to assess East Kettering Phase 1 would form the “No Development” (Do Minimum) scenario for the purpose of this TA. These flows were available at an Assessment Year of 2021, which was agreed to be an acceptable basis for assessment.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 40 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

5.09 For the “With Development” (Do Something) scenario, forecast development traffic generation by the A14J10 Business Park was added to the NSTM Do Minimum trip matrices and a new set of assigned traffic flows obtained for each study area junction of interest was obtained.

5.10 Overall, the modelling work has been undertaken in two main stages as follows:-

STAGE 1: NSTM  Obtain 2021 “Do Minimum” traffic flows from existing East Kettering Phase 1 assessments.

 Add forecast traffic generation of A14J10 Business Park to the “Do Minimum” trip matrices, modify network to include the development Transport Strategy and reassign to obtain set of 2021 Do Something traffic flows.

STAGE 2: VISSIM  Use the “Do Something” flows obtained from the NSTM as identified above to test the operation of the Transport Strategy network as shown on Figure 1A.

 Examine results and refine highway designs to ensure that traffic demands will be satisfactorily accommodated.

 Re-run VISSIM model with network modifications as above.

5.11 The Stage 1 work was undertaken by MGWSP, whereas Stage 2 was completed by AECOM.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 41 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

Modelling Periods

5.12 All stages of modelling covered the weekday peak hours. These periods are considered suitable for the assessment of the proposed development, which comprises mainly employment-related uses and whose traffic generation would be greatest during the weekday peak hours. Inter-peak and weekend time periods have not, therefore, been included.

5.13 As discussed above, a single Assessment Year of 2021 was adopted for all model runs and junction evaluations, which coincides with the assessment year for East Kettering Phase 1.

Test Scenarios

5.14 The NSTM and VISSIM networks consider the following scenarios at the common 2021assessment year:-

 Do Minimum (DM) – includes all East Kettering Phase 1 accesses, highway infrastructure and public transport services;

 Do Something (DS) – as above, but with the A14J10 Business Park Transport Strategy (Figure 1A) network modifications and traffic generation included.

5.15 The Do Minimum scenario provides the “Reference Case” against which the impact of the proposed development and its associated transport measures has been assessed. In addition to East Kettering, it includes various other committed developments that will be in place by 2021 and the HA’s scheme to widen the A14 between Junctions 7 and 9.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 42 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

5.16 The Do Something scenario adds the proposed development and Transport Strategy as shown on Figure 1A. No other off-site mitigation measures are identified in Section 7 and therefore, no further NSTM model runs beyond the DS scenario have been undertaken. The development's traffic generation is based on the worst-case scenario without any new modal shift arising from the Travel Plan. It thus represents the worst-case scenario in terms of traffic impact.

5.17 The contents of each scenario in terms of network specification, background traffic growth levels and committed development assumptions were agreed between the two Highway Authorities as suitable for use in assessing the traffic impacts of the A14J10 Business Park scheme.

Traffic Surveys

5.18 To enable the validation of the local transport models, a comprehensive programme of traffic surveys was agreed with the Highway Authorities and undertaken on behalf of Roxhill as detailed below. The surveys were undertaken during early July 2012 on dates that were agreed with the Highway Authorities.

5.19 Morning and evening peak period traffic surveys were undertaken at the following locations:-

 A6/A510 Roundabout at Finedon  Kettering Road/Station Road, Burton Latimer  Kettering Road/Altendiez Way, Burton Latimer  A14J10 Roundabout  A14J9 Roundabout  Barton Road/Woodland Road  Barton Road/Cranford Road  Barton Road/Warkton Lane  Barton Road/Windmill Avenue  Barton Road/London Road/Pytchley Road

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 43 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

5.20 The period of the surveys included the same peak periods as covered by the NSTM and VISIMM models.

5.21 Details of the traffic survey results, as supplied to MGWSP for use in the NSTM modelling exercise, can be made available in electronic format on request.

Model Outputs

5.22 The 2021 “Do Minimum” and “Do Something” assessment traffic flows obtained from the NSTM that form the basis for this TA are included in Appendix E.

5.23 The results of the VISSIM modelling exercise are discussed and presented in Section 7.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 44 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

6.0 TRAFFIC GENERATION

General

6.01 This section of the TA summarises the parameters and assumptions used to forecast the total volume of traffic that would be generated by the proposed development and presents the resulting traffic generation forecasts as input to the modelling process.

Existing Traffic Generation

6.02 The development site is currently in agricultural use and generates no significant vehicle movements at present. There are no extant panning consents that need to be taken into account in the base (No Development) scenario. As a consequence, existing traffic movements are minimal and have been ignored.

Employment Development Trip Rates

6.03 Following a series of discussions with the Highway Authorities, traffic generation rates for each of the component land uses were agreed as follows:-

 B1a – the same set of trip rates as adopted for the East Kettering assessments were used;

 B1c and B8 – trip rates previously been agreed between Roxhill and the HA in respect of the now-approved Coventry and Warwickshire Gateway (C&WG) project were supplied to MGWSP, who then used TRICS to derive a comparable set of trip rates that identify light and heavy vehicles separately;

 B2 – trip rates were obtained from the TRICS database by MGWSP.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 45 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

6.04 Summaries of the agreed employment trip rates for light and heavy vehicles respectively are therefore presented in Tables 6.1 & 6.2 below. Further details are provided in Appendix F.

Table 6.1: Light Vehicle Trip Generation Rates – Employment Uses AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LAND USE Inbound Outbound Inbound Outbound B1c Office 1.420 0.20 0.160 1.160 B1c Light Industry 1.382 0.263 0.188 1.143 B2 Industrial 0.444 0.199 0.106 0.367 B8 Distribution 0.071 0.030 0.022 0.076

Figures are Trips per 100m2 GFA.

Table 6.2: Heavy Vehicle Trip Generation Rates – Employment Uses AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LAND USE Inbound Outbound Inbound Outbound B1c Office 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 B1c Light Industry 0.023 0.017 0.007 0.008 B2 Industrial 0.021 0.027 0.010 0.008 B8 Distribution 0.013 0.014 0.010 0.008

Figures are Trips per 100m2 GFA.

Roadside Service Facility Trip Rates

6.05 As requested by MGWSP, the traffic generation of the proposed Roadside Services Area was assessed using trip rates obtained from the TRICS database for Petrol Filling stations, as summarised in Table 6.3, below:-

Table 6.3: Total Vehicle Trip Generation Rates – Road-Side Service Area AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LAND USE Inbound Outbound Inbound Outbound Petrol Filling Station 9.474 9.722 11.361 11.105

Figures are Trips per 100m2 GFA.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 46 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

Site Traffic Generation

6.06 The trip rates identified in Table 6.1 to 6.3 were applied to the development areas identified previously in Section 3. The resulting overall site traffic generation is summarised in Table 6.4, below:-

Table 6.4: Total Development Traffic Generation (all Vehicle Classes) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LAND USE Inbound Outbound Inbound Outbound B1c Office 300 49 34 245 B1c Light Industry 44 9 6 36 B2 Industrial 117 57 29 94 B8 Distribution 60 32 23 60 Road Side Services 114 117 136 133 Total 635 264 228 568 Total exc. Roadside 521 147 92 435

6.07 The total non-roadside trips were distributed within the NSTM by MGWSP, using similar assumptions as applied to East Kettering.

6.08 For the Road-Side Services, total generated trips were divided as follows:-

 New – trips that are not currently made and that would be attracted to the network by the new facility;

 Diverted – existing trips that are currently made to other competing facilities that would instead divert from these to visit the new facility;

 Pass-By – existing trips passing the site on the immediately adjacent highway network which would call at the new facility en-route to a further destination.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 47 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

6.09 It was agreed that road-side services trips would be split between the above trip types in the following proportions:

 New trips – 10%  Diverted trips – 30%  Pass-by existing trips – 60%

6.10 All New trips were assumed to be local traffic drawn from the Kettering Road/Barton Road corridor A14 mainline. Diverted trips were assumed to be mainly drawn from the A14 mainline, with a modest proportion being drawn from the Barton Road corridor based on the location of existing competing facilities. Pass-By trips were assumed to be drawn from the routes leading into the facility Site Access Roundabout.

6.11 The distribution of each trip type was agreed with NCC and MGWSP. Trips were then assigned in accordance with these trip distributions and input to the NSTM separately from the employment development flows.

6.12 Details of the trip generation calculations are presented in Appendix G.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 48 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

7.0 HIGHWAY IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Material Traffic Flow Increases

7.01 To assess the influence of development traffic on the adjacent highway network, the “Do Something” (DS) flows were compared to the “Do Minimum” (DM) flows in order to identify volumetric and percentage changes in traffic flow on the approach to each of the 27 study area junctions.

7.02 The DfT’s “Guidance of Transport Assessment” (2007) does not specify a particular level of percentage change at which an increase in traffic flow is defined as material, but states that this may be relatively low in congested areas. Prior to this Guidance it was considered that in non-congested areas, increases of more than 5% may be regarded as material. For this TA, a 5% threshold has been used as a guide to the need for further assessment in non-sensitive areas. Elsewhere, each section of the highway network has been considered on the basis of the prevailing circumstances. In all cases, volumetric increases have also been considered in accordance with the DfT Guidelines. All traffic flows are expressed in Passenger Car Units (PCU’s) as output by the NSTM.

7.03 Summary diagrams showing assessment flows for both the Do Minimum and Do Something scenarios are presented in Appendix E. An appraisal of material traffic flow increases is also included, together with a qualitative assessment of the degree of impact that is likely to result.

7.04 By reference to Appendix E, it can be seen that at the boundaries to the study area percentage changes in one-way traffic flow are generally below 5%. The only exceptions are:-

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 49 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

 The A6 southbound in Finedon, south of the A510, during the AM peak hour only (6.5% increase). However, the equivalent volumetric increase is just 57 PCU’s or less than 1 PCU per minute. This is unlikely to be perceptible in practice and is not considered to be a material change;

 East Kettering “Access E”, where increases of 17.8% during the AM peak hour and 14.3% during the PM peak hour are predicted. However, these are actually attributable to modest DM flows; the volumetric increases being just 16 and 9 PCU’s in the AM and PM peak hours respectively and therefore not material;

 East Kettering “Access D”, where percentage increase of more than 24.2% and 37.4% during the AM and PM peak hours respectively are forecast to enter the study area from East Kettering. The equivalent volumetric increases are 84 and 129 PCU’s. However, the overall DS one-way flow on this link would remain well within its design capacity at less than 500 PCU’s during both peak hours;

 The main approaches to Junction 21 (Windmill Avenue/Stamford Road) are predicted to experience percentage increases of more than 5%, but the equivalent volumetric increases would be no more than 35 PCU’s and would therefore not be material.

 Hawthorn Road during the AM peak hour, where increases of marginally above 5% are forecast. However, the equivalent volumetric increase is just 12 PCU’s towards the junction and is therefore not material.

 Finedon Station Road eastbound is predicted to experience increases of 20.6% and 13.8% during the AM and PM peak hours respectively. However, the equivalent volumetric increases are just 35 and 30 PCU’s respectively, or less than 1 PCU every 2 minutes. This effect is not considered material.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 50 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

7.05 Finedon Road south of Higham Road, travelling northbound, is also predicted to experience increases in flow of 219 and 128 PCU’s during the AM and PM peak hours respectively. However, this is attributable to an inconsistency within the NSTM, in which traffic flows are incorrectly reassigned from Cranford Road in the DS scenario. This matter has been discussed with NCC and was addressed within the VISSIM model by reassigning traffic flows manually.

7.06 Within the study area, material increases in traffic flow are predicted to occur at a number of junctions, but in many cases these are offset by decreases on other links. Nevertheless, all 27 of the junctions within the study area have been subjected to either micro-simulation or other assessment in order to confirm the development’s impact on their operation.

VISSIM Results – Proposed Transport Strategy and A14J10

7.07 The results of the VISSIM analyses prepared by AECOM in respect of the Transport Strategy are presented in Appendix G. The modelling includes the following parts of the highway network (the junction numbers as per Figure C):-

 A14J10 Rotary (Junction 4);

 A14 J10 merge/diverge facilities and Main-Line to either side (Junction 4);

 East Kettering “Access F” on Barton Road north of A14J10 (Junction 4A);

 Main Site Access Roundabout (Junction SA1)

 Roundabout junction of SDR, A14J10 Link and RSA access (Junction SA2)

 The improved A6/Cranford Road Roundabout (Junction 16).

 The Barton Road, SDR and A6 links connecting the above junctions.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 51 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

7.08 The VISSIM assessment confirms that all parts of the above network would operate in a satisfactory manner, with reserve capacity and without excessive queuing. The design of the Transport Strategy as shown in Appendix C is therefore considered appropriate and acceptable on this basis.

Off-Site Junction Capacity Assessments

7.09 The remaining off-site junctions have been assessed using appropriate industry- standard software, as follows:-

 Priority Junctions – TRL “Junctions 8” (PICADY module)  Roundabouts – TRL “Junctions 8” (ARCADY module)  Traffic Signal Junctions – LINSIG v3

7.10 For Junctions 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 14, 15, 21 and 22, approved models prepared for the East Kettering RMA process were supplied by MGWSP for use in this TA. These models include any proposed improvements that will be delivered by East Kettering.

7.11 For all other junctions, new models of the existing layouts were built and submitted to MGWSP for approval.

7.12 All modelling is based on the relevant NSTM traffic flows and have been input as PCU’s, which consider the relative impact of differing vehicle sizes and characteristics. Queues are also quoted in PCU’s and a single PCU is considered to have a length of 5.75 metres in accordance with standard practice.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 52 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

7.13 The Ratio of Flow to Capacity (RFC) value provides an indication of how close to capacity each entry to the junction would operate. An RFC value of less than 1.00 indicates that the entry is operating within capacity. The desirable maximum RFC value for new junctions at the appropriate design year is 0.85 for priority or roundabout junctions. This provides reserve capacity for daily fluctuations in traffic demand.

7.14 At traffic signal junctions, the term “Degree of Saturation” (DoS) is generally used instead of RFC. It is similar in concept to the RFC, but is expressed as a percentage. A DoS value of less than 100% indicates that the entry is operating within capacity. The desirable maximum DoS value for new junctions is 90% at the appropriate design year, which provides reserve capacity for daily fluctuations in traffic demand.

7.15 The results of most modelling are given in the context of each arm. However in the case of models based on the PICADY module of JUNCTIONS 8, results are quoted by traffic stream (i.e. – turning movement).

7.16 Full model outputs for each junction are presented in Appendices H1 to H26 (Appendix numbering corresponds to the relevant junction number as shown on Figure C).

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 53 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

Junction 1: A6/A510 Roundabout, Finedon

7.17 The results of the ARCADY assessment of this existing junction are summarised in Table 7.1 below:-

Table 7.1: Capacity Assessment of Junction 1 – A6/A510 Roundabout, Finedon

7.18 The results show that the junction is forecast to operate above capacity in all scenarios. However, the DS scenario shows only a modest impact on the A6 approaches (northbound during the AM peak hour and southbound during the PM peak hour). These would be off-set by reductions in queuing and delay on the A510 west entry, such that the overall change in the number of vehicles queued summed across all arms of the junction would be a reduction during the AM peak hour and a modest increase during the PM peak hour. Given the benefits to AM peak hour operation that are predicted, it is considered the development would not have a significant impact on the junction’s operation overall.

7.19 On this basis, it is considered that no improvements are required at this location.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 54 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

Junction 2: Kettering Road/Station Road Mini-Roundabout

7.20 The results of the ARCADY assessment of this existing junction are summarised in Table 7.2 below:-

Table 7.2: Capacity Assessment of Junction 2 – Kettering Rd/Station Rd

7.21 The results show that the proposed development would have an impact on the Kettering Road South arm during both peak hours. However, this arises from the known inconsistency within the NSTM described previously, which results in wrongly reassigned traffic flows using the junction in the DS scenario. The predicted impacts identified above are therefore not expected to occur in practice.

7.22 On this basis, it is considered that no improvements are required at this location.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 55 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

Junction 3: Kettering Road/Altendiez Way Roundabout

7.23 The results of the ARCADY assessment of this existing junction are summarised in Table 7.3 below:-

Table 7.3: Capacity Assessment of Junction 3 – Kettering Rd/Altendiez Way

7.24 The results show that the junction would operate within capacity in all scenarios. Therefore, no improvements are required to accommodate the proposed development.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 56 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

Junction 5: A14 Junction 9 (A14J9) Roundabout

7.25 The results of the ARCADY assessment of this junction are summarised in Table 7.5 below:-

Table 7.5: Capacity Assessment of Junction 5 – A14 Junction 9 Roundabout

7.26 The results show that the junction would operate within capacity in all scenarios. Therefore, no improvements are required to accommodate the proposed development.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 57 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

Junction 6: Barton Road/Woodland Avenue

7.27 The results of the PICADY assessment of this existing priority-controlled junction are summarised in Table 7.6 below. Relevant traffic stream labelling is as follows:-

 Stream B-C = Woodland Ave to Barton Rd North  Stream B-A = Woodland Ave to Barton Rd South  Stream C-AB = Barton Rd North to Woodland Ave and Barton Rd South

Table 7.6: Capacity Assessment of Junction 6 – Barton Rd/Woodland Ave

7.28 The results show that the junction would operate within capacity in all scenarios. Therefore, no improvements are required to accommodate the proposed development.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 58 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

Junction 7: Barton Road/Cranford Road Signals

7.29 The results of the LINSIG assessment of this existing traffic signal-controlled junction are summarised in Table 7.7 below:-

Table 7.7: Capacity Assessment of Junction 7 – Barton Rd/Cranford Rd AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach Max Max DoS (%)* DoS (%)* Queue Queue Do Minimum Barton Rd North 135.6% 139 147.7% 146 Cranford Rd 4.4% 0 4.6% 0 Barton Rd South 128.9% 97 145.4% 192 Do Something Barton Rd North 126.6% 117 130.7% 131 Cranford Rd 4.4% 0 4.6% 0 Barton Rd South 130.8% 94 135.1% 150

7.30 The results show that the junction is predicted to operate above capacity in all scenarios. The DS scenario is predicted to result in a modest improvement in overall junction operation. On this basis, no improvements are required at this location to accommodate the proposed development.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 59 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

Junction 8: Barton Road/Warkton Lane/East Kettering Access E

7.31 The results of the ARCADY assessment of this proposed roundabout junction are summarised in Table 7.8 below:-

Table 7.8: Capacity Assessment of Junction 8 – Barton Rd/Warkton Ln/Acc E

7.32 The results show that the junction would operate within capacity in all scenarios. Therefore, no improvements are required to accommodate the proposed development.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 60 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

Junction 9: Barton Road/St Botolph’s Road

7.33 The results of the PICADY assessment of this existing priority junction are summarised in Table 7.9 below. Relevant traffic stream labelling is as follows:-

 Stream B-C = St Botolph’s Rd to Barton Rd West  Stream B-A = St Botolph’s Rd to Barton Rd East  Stream C-B = Barton Rd West to St Botolph’s Rd

Table 7.8: Capacity Assessment of Junction 9 – Barton Rd/St Botolph’s Rd

7.34 The results show that the junction would operate within capacity in all scenarios. Therefore, no improvements are required to accommodate the proposed development.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 61 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

Junction 10: Barton Road/Windmill Avenue Signals

7.35 The results of the LINSIG assessment of this traffic signal-controlled junction, with improvements to be delivered by East Kettering, are summarised in Table 7.10 below:-

Table 7.10: Capacity Assessment of Junction 10 – Barton Rd/Windmill Ave AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach Max Max DoS (%)* DoS (%)* Queue Queue Do Minimum Barton Rd West 90.4% 12 86.5% 21 Windmill Ave entry 63.3% 5 84.7% 13 Barton Rd East Ahead 39.8% 3 37.2% 5 Barton Rd East RT 82.2% 5 80.6% 7 Windmill Ave exit 32.5% 0 34.1% 0 Do Something Barton Rd West 92.3% 14 82.1% 19 Windmill Ave entry 66.2% 6 80.5% 12 Barton Rd East Ahead 40.9% 4 35.4% 5 Barton Rd East RT 83.0% 5 81.7% 6 Windmill Ave exit 32.8% 0 31.8% 1

7.36 The results show that the proposed development would have a very modest impact on the Barton Road West arm of the junction during the Am peak hour. However, the predicted in queuing on this arm is just 2 PCU’s, which is not considered to be material. No improvements are therefore required at this location to accommodate the proposed development.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 62 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

Junction 11: Barton Road/London Road/Pytchley Road Roundabout

7.37 The results of the ARCADY assessment of this existing roundabout junction, with improvements to be delivered by East Kettering, are summarised in Table 7.11 below:-

Table 7.11: Capacity Assessment of Junction 11 – Barton Rd/London Rd

7.38 The results show that the junction would operate within capacity in all scenarios. Therefore, no improvements are required to accommodate the proposed development.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 63 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

Junction 12: High Street/Higham Road/Finedon Road Mini Roundabout

7.39 The results of the ARCADY assessment of this existing junction are summarised in Table 7.12 below:-

Table 7.12: Capacity Assessment of Junction 12 – High Street/Higham Rd

7.40 The results show that the junction would operate within capacity in all scenarios. Therefore, no improvements are required to accommodate the proposed development.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 64 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

Junction 13: A6/Higham Road

7.41 The results of the ARCADY assessment of this existing junction are summarised in Table 7.13 below:-

Table 7.13: Capacity Assessment of Junction 13 – A6/Higham Rd

7.42 The results show that the junction would operate within capacity in all scenarios. Therefore, no improvements are required to accommodate the proposed development.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 65 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

Junction 14: Warkton Lane/Deeble Road/East Kettering Access D

7.43 The results of the ARCADY assessment of this proposed roundabout junction are summarised in Table 7.14 below:-

Table 7.14: Capacity Assessment of Junction 14 – Warkton Ln/Deeble Rd

7.44 The results show that the junction would operate within capacity in all scenarios. Therefore, no improvements are required to accommodate the proposed development.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 66 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

Junction 15: Windmill Avenue/Deeble Road

7.45 The results of the ARCADY assessment of this proposed roundabout junction are summarised in Table 7.15 below:-

Table 7.15: Capacity Assessment of Junction 15 – Windmill Ave/Deeble Rd

7.46 The results show that the junction would operate within capacity in all scenarios. Therefore, no improvements are required to accommodate the proposed development.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 67 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

Junction 17: A509/Finedon Station Road

7.47 The results of the PICADY assessment of this existing priority junction are summarised in Table 7.17 below. Relevant traffic stream labelling is as follows:-

 Stream B-C = Finedon Station Road to A509 South  Stream B-A = Finedon Station Road to A509 North  Stream C-B = A509 South to Finedon Station Road

Table 7.17: Capacity Assessment of Junction 17 – A509/Finedon Station Rd

7.48 The junction is predicted to operate above capacity in the DM scenario. However, the DS scenario shows that the operation of the junction would be improved as a result of traffic flows being reassigned. No improvements are therefore required to accommodate the proposed development.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 68 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

Junction 18: A509/Station Road

7.49 The results of the ARCADY assessment of this existing mini-roundabout junction are summarised in Table 7.18 below:-

Table 7.18: Capacity Assessment of Junction 18 – A509/Station Rd

7.50 The junction is predicted to operate above capacity in all scenarios. In the DS scenario, there would be a modest impact on the A509 North arm, but this would be off-set by a more significant decrease in queuing on the Station Road arm, such that there would be no overall net increase in total vehicles queued, summed across all arms of the junction. During the PM peak hour, there would be a modest net increase in overall queuing, but given the benefits to AM peak hour operation that are predicted, it is considered the development would not have a significant impact on the junction’s operation overall.

7.51 On this basis, it is considered that no improvements are required at this location.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 69 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

Junction 19: Station Road/Polwell Lane

7.52 The results of the PICADY assessment of this existing priority junction are summarised in Table 7.19 below. Relevant traffic stream labelling is as follows:-

 Stream A-BCD = Station Road East (all movements)  Stream D-AB = Polwell Lane ahead and right turn  Stream D-BC = Polwell Lane ahead and left turn  Stream C-B = Station Road West RT to Bridle Road

Table 7.19: Capacity Assessment of Junction 19 – Station Rd/Polwell Ln

7.53 The junction is predicted to operate above capacity in the DM scenario (AM peak hour). However, the DS scenario shows that the operation of the junction would be improved as a result of traffic flows being reassigned. No improvements are therefore required to accommodate the proposed development.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 70 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

Junction 20: Polwell Lane/Altendiez Way

7.54 The results of the PICADY assessment of this existing priority junction are summarised in Table 7.20 below. Relevant traffic stream labelling is as follows:-

 Stream B-C = Polwell Ln West to Altendiez Way North  Stream B-A = Polwell Ln West to Polwell Lane South  Stream C-B = Altendiez Way North to Polwell Ln West

Table 7.20: Capacity Assessment of Junction 20 – Polwell Ln/Altendiez Way

7.55 The junction is predicted to operate above capacity in the DM scenario (AM peak hour). However, the DS scenario shows that the operation of the junction would be improved as a result of traffic flows being reassigned. No improvements are therefore required to accommodate the proposed development.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 71 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

Junction 21: Stamford Road/Windmill Avenue

7.56 The results of the ARCADY assessment of this mini-roundabout junction are summarised in Table 7.21 below:-

Table 7.21: Capacity Assessment of Junction 21 – Stamford Rd/Windmill Ave

7.57 The results show that the junction would operate within capacity in all scenarios. Therefore, no improvements are required to accommodate the proposed development.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 72 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

Junction 22: Windmill Avenue/St Mary’s Road

7.58 The results of the ARCADY assessment of this mini-roundabout junction are summarised in Table 7.22 below:-

Table 7.22: Capacity Assessment of Junction 22 – Windmill Ave/St Mary’s Rd

7.59 The results show that the junction would operate within capacity in all scenarios. Therefore, no improvements are required to accommodate the proposed development.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 73 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

Junction 23: London Road/Roundhill Road

7.60 The results of the PICADY assessment of this existing priority junction are summarised in Table 7.23 below. Relevant traffic stream labelling is as follows:-

 Stream B-C = Roundhill Rd to London Rd North  Stream B-A = Roundhill Rd to London Rd South  Stream C-AB = London Rd North to Roundhill Rd and London Rd South

Table 7.23: Capacity Assessment of Junction 23 – London Rd/Roundhill Rd

7.61 The results show that the junction would operate within capacity in all scenarios. Therefore, no improvements are required to accommodate the proposed development.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 74 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

Junction 24: London Road/Piper’s Hill Road

7.62 The results of the PICADY assessment of this existing priority junction are summarised in Table 7.24 below. Relevant traffic stream labelling is as follows:-

 Stream B-C = Piper’s Hill Rd to London Rd North  Stream B-A = Piper’s Hill Rd to London Rd South  Stream C-AB = London Rd North to Piper’s Hill Rd and London Rd South

Table 7.24: Capacity Assessment of Junction 24 – London Rd/Piper’s Hill Rd

7.63 The results show that the junction would operate within capacity in all scenarios. Therefore, no improvements are required to accommodate the proposed development.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 75 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

Junction 25: London Road/Hawthorn Road

7.64 The results of the PICADY assessment of this existing priority junction are summarised in Table 7.25 below. Relevant traffic stream labelling is as follows:-

 Stream B-C = Hawthorn Rd to London Rd North  Stream B-A = Hawthorn Rd to London Rd South  Stream C-AB = London Rd North to Hawthorn Rd and London Rd South

Table 7.25: Capacity Assessment of Junction 25 – London Rd/Hawthorn Rd

7.65 The junction is predicted to operate above capacity in all scenarios. The DS assessment shows that the developments would have a modest impact on capacity, but this would not be material in terms of increased queuing. It is therefore considered that no improvements are required to accommodate the proposed development.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 76 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

Junction 26: A14 Junction 3 (A14J3) Roundabouts

7.66 The results of the ARCADY assessments of the northern and southern roundabout elements of A14J3 are summarised in Tables 7.26A & 7.26B below:-

Table 7.26A: Capacity Assessment of Junction 26A – A14J3 North Roundabout

Table 7.26B: Capacity Assessment of Junction 26B – A14J3 South Roundabout

7.67 The results show that the junction would operate within capacity in all scenarios. Therefore, no improvements are required to accommodate the proposed development.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 77 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

Summary

7.68 Overall, it is considered that the TA has demonstrated that the proposed development can be accommodated on the highway network of interest without materially adverse impacts. On this basis, there is no requirement for physical improvements above and beyond the Transport Strategy shown in Appendix C.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 78 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

8.0 PUBLIC TRANSPORT STRATEGY

Bus Services

8.01 As discussed previously, the area immediately adjacent to the site is already served by existing bus services which pass close to the development along the A6 and Cranford Road. These are considered to be capable of meeting the needs of the site in terms of accessibility, desirability and frequency and therefore an improved and varied service is not required as part of the scheme.

8.02 Excluding the limited stop X4 Service (Table 4.1) three existing bus services are of particular relevance to the development. These are:-

 Route X1, which passes alongside the site and up the A6 to A14 Junction 10 and Kettering. The route delivers a 30 minute frequency service at peak times along the Cranford Road but this is less frequent at the northern end where the service splits to serve different parts of Kettering.

 Routes 16 and 406, which provide a more strategic service to the north of the A14 out to the east.

 Routes 49 and 50, which primarily serve Burton Latimer and generally operate towards the south-west of the site.

8.03 It is likely (given the current pattern of service) that the Route X1 services can be tailored to meet the needs of the development by simply ensuring that local stopping, waiting and crossing facilities are adequate, inviting and well located. The following measures are therefore proposed with respect to bus travel:-

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 79 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

 The provision of new bus stops, shelters, waiting and standing areas and inter-connecting footways and road crossings as part of the development south of the A14;

 The guaranteed provision of timetable information for all employees and visitors to the site, from the initial occupation of any commercial building, as one of the Travel Plan initiatives. Information will be provided in both a paper and electronic format and will identify bus routes from the outset and provide personalised travel planning to allow all options to be easily understood. It will also include the existing County-wide travel booklets, which will be made readily available.

 The provision of a bus travel information system within each new commercial building on the site, linked directly to the development website (see below) and other existing virtual infrastructure such as the NCC Travel Web Site. The intention would be to encourage use of the latter as a “One-Stop-Shop” for all public transport queries.

8.04 The potential for other new bus services will additionally be quantified through the site-wide Travel Plan. To this end, the Travel Plan Coordinator will work with the Bus Operators and the County and Borough Councils to ensure that the needs of the development are taken into consideration in the planning of any new services.

Rail Services

8.05 The nearest Railway Station to the site is Kettering, on MML from London. It is within 10 minutes easy cycle time (3km) of the development and can be reached on Bus Route X1.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 80 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

8.06 The Station is served by frequent trains to and from Sheffield and London, being every thirty minutes at peak times together with further direct trains to Nottingham, Loughborough, Leicester and other destinations to the north. It is therefore both desirable and accessible from a commuting point of view.

8.07 The Travel Plan will explore a number of ways in which the existing transport links between Kettering Station and the site could be improved to further to encourage usage. These are expected to include:-

 The guaranteed provision of timetable information for all staff and visitors to the site, from the initial occupation of any commercial building;

 The provision of a web-based information system relating to rail travel;

 By the provision of good cycle links to ensure that maximum use of cycles is made (see Section 9).

8.08 It is intended that the Travel Plan Co-ordinator will progress each of the above options, with a view to securing the best, most cost effective means of transferring passengers between the site and the Railway Station.

Passenger Information

8.09 For rail and bus travel, the provision of passenger information is important to ensure that residents and employees will view public transport as a viable alternative to the car. A major task of the Travel Plan will thus be to disseminate information effectively and provide a “Bulletin Board” within the site complex. This will be made available both physically and electronically to all, with the information displays provided for public transport additionally being used to display train times.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 81 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

8.10 The scheme will therefore provide travel notice boards, “Real-Time Travel Information” (RTI) displays and “Welcome Packs” throughout the development, to ensure that information relating to travel options is available in both a quick and convenient manner. Information provided via each mode will be up-dated by the Travel Plan Co-ordinator on a regular basis.

8.11 The Travel Plan will, as a matter of priority, establish a bespoke website for the proposed development, which will provide information on travel and the use of non-car modes via the on-site computer network on an RTI basis.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 82 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

9.0 PEDESTRIANS, CYCLISTS AND THE MOBILITY-IMPAIRED

9.01 The layout of the development and associated highway infrastructure has been designed to include cycleway and footway connections to all parts of the development from the local road and footpath network. Many existing areas and facilities are within easy walking and cycling distance of the site as shown previously. As a result, the Reserved Matters planning process will be used to help encourage foot and cycle use through good design.

9.02 The proposed SDR and the A14J10 link will include new footways and, in the case of the latter, foot-cycleways, to connect the main site access with the existing highway network (see Appendix C for details).

9.03 In terms of off-site provision, the Developer proposes to upgrade existing footway and cycleway provision along the A6 south-east of the site access and on other routes connecting with the local population centres to help deliver the target mode share for walking and cycling as identified in the accompanying Travel Plan.

9.04 In addition to the physical infrastructure identified above, information about safe cycle routes and the encouragement of residents and employees to use cycles will be promoted by the Travel Plan Co-ordinator as part of the overall Travel Plan.

9.05 It is proposed that at least 150 covered cycle stands will be provided (giving a total of 300 cycle parking spaces) across the completed development. Stands will be secure and located in visible, well lit and safe locations. All commercial occupiers will be required to provide shower facilities for cyclists, together with changing areas and secure storage lockers.

9.06 All off-site footways and cycleways between the site and the surrounding network, together with new parts of the A6, will be illuminated as part of the scheme.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 83 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

9.07 The site-wide Travel Plan provides a range of initiatives that will be implemented in order to encourage walking and cycling to and from the completed development.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 84 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

10.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

10.01 This Report has considered the key transport issues relevant to the proposed employment development known as the A14 Junction 10 Business Park, at Kettering in Northamptonshire. The scheme is being promoted by Roxhill Developments Limited (Roxhill) and will be the subject of an Outline Planning Application in due course.

10.02 The site is located immediately to the south of the A14 at Junction 10 (A14J10) and to the north of Burton Latimer. It would provide some a mix of B1, B2 and B8 Use Class employment with an ultimate total Gross Floor Area (GFA) of around 1.38 million square feet (128,000m2). The Outline Planning Application would be for approximately 108,000m2 with the remaining land being reserved for future development.

10.03 Vehicular access to the site would be achieved through a Transport Strategy, which would provide a realignment of the existing A6 within the site, known as the Southern Distributor Road (SDR) which would connect to a new link to A14J10 and would carry both A6 and Kettering Road traffic. As a result, the existing A6 connection to A14J10 would be removed, which would reduce the number of turning movements at the junction thus releasing traffic capacity. In addition, full traffic signal control and other capacity-related enhancements would be provided at A14J10.

10.04 Access to the development itself would be provided via a roundabout junction with the SDR. In addition, a Roadside Service Area (RSA) would be provided at the western part of the site, immediately west of the new A14J10 Link. This would be accessed from a roundabout junction of the Link with the SDR.

10.05 In addition, the scheme would provide improvements to the A6/Cranford Road Roundabout, which has been the scene of several recent serious and fatal accidents.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 85 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

10.06 The Transport Strategy has been designed to be fully compatible with other highway schemes that are planned to serve the adjacent East Kettering Sustainable Urban Extension (SUE) north of the A14. The schematic drawings presented in this TA show how the Roxhill Transport Strategy could fit in with the construction of a new A14 Junction 10A in the future. The additional physical works required to deliver these enhancements would not be implemented by Roxhill, but it has been shown in this TA that upgrade paths are available, utilising either Junction 10A or an expanded Junction 10.

10.07 The Report presents a Transport Assessment (TA) of the development scheme. It has considered the capacity of the various Transport Strategy highway elements as well as the scheme’s impact on A14J10 and a number of off-site junctions. The scope of the TA and junctions to be assessed were agreed in advance with the relevant Highway Authorities, being; Northamptonshire County Council (NCC) and the Highways Agency (HA).

10.08 The assessment has been undertaken at an Assessment Year of 2021, using a combination of existing transport models; specifically the Northamptonshire Strategic Transport Model (NSTM) and the HA’s VISSIM micro-simulation model of the A14 Kettering Bypass. The NSTM was used to generate the assessment traffic flows with and without the scheme, for the purpose of assessing its traffic effects. The VISSIM model was used to confirm that the Transport Strategy elements and associated junctions (A14J10, the new A14J10 link, the SDR and East Kettering access from Barton Road and improved A6/Cranford Road Roundabout) would provide adequate capacity and would operate in a satisfactory manner.

10.09 Use of these models has ensured that the TA also takes into account the major “committed” development and transport schemes in the area; being the East Kettering SUE and A14 Junctions 7 to 9 Widening.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 86 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

10.10 The assessment is based on a robust appraisal of traffic generation and takes no account of modal shift away from the private car. This is in spite of a robust Travel Plan the significant proposed improvements to walking and cycling facilities which are also expected to provide improved access to public transport services in the area.

10.11 The key findings of the assessment are summarised below:-

i) The VISSIM assessment has demonstrated that the proposed Transport Strategy elements would provide sufficient capacity for forecast traffic movements at the Assessment Year, with the development and Phase 1 of East Kettering in place.

ii) The majority of off-site junctions would provide sufficient capacity for forecast traffic flows both with and without the development in place. Those that are forecast to operate above capacity without the scheme would experience no material detriment or, in many cases, a modest improvement in operation. The development would not, therefore, have any detrimental effect on the performance of the local highway network and cold be accommodated without the need for improvement

iii) The A14 Junction 10 Interchange is forecast to operate in a satisfactory manner with the proposed development in place, subject to implementation of the Transport Strategy including up-grading of the Rotary element of the junction to traffic signal control and enhancement of the existing merge/diverge facilities as shown in this Report.

iv) The development is not forecast to give rise to adverse traffic impacts at any locations other than those assessed within this Report.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 87 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

10.12 The number of car parking spaces to be provided within the development has yet to be agreed, but will be based on NCC’s “Parking – Supplementary Planning Guidance” document of 2003, as required by their current LTP3 Parking Strategy (January 2013). Appropriate adjustments will be made to ensure that Travel Plan objectives are met and these are outlined in the separate Travel Plan (TP). The aim will be to achieve a balance between the need to provide sufficient operational car parking and the need to avoid encouraging excessive car use. The final number of spaces to be provided will be subject to agreement with the Highway and Planning Authorities and will be under-pinned by the TP.

10.13 The proposed development and associated transport and access strategies are underpinned by national, regional and local policies, which seek to locate major freight-generating developments where they can be served from the strategic highway network and where the impact of Heavy Goods Vehicles (HGV’s) on the local environment can be minimised. The location of the site is clearly in compliance with this requirement.

10.14 Existing weight restrictions to the south of the site would deter HGV’s from accessing the site via the Burton Latimer village area and all such vehicles would therefore reach the site via the A6, A14J10 and Altendiez Way.

10.15 A range of existing bus services pass close to the site. To maximise use of public transport, new bus stops and other infrastructure enhancements are proposed to enable employees at the site to access Service X1.

10.16 The site offers good opportunities for trips to be made by cycle and on foot. To maximise the potential for such trips, the following initiatives are proposed:-

i) Improvements to the foot/cycle network on Kettering Road, including new 3m footway/cycleway between the SDR and A14J10, pedestrian crossings and additional street lighting;

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 88 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

ii) A new footway along the SDR to connect Kettering Road to the main site access;

iii) Signing of the main routes to Button Latimer village centre;

iv) The provision of cycle parking lockers within the site, located close to each building.

10.17 The public transport, pedestrian and cyclist access strategies would be complemented by a formal Travel Plan, which is submitted as part of the Planning Application. It is envisaged that a Travel Plan Co-ordinator would be employed by the Developer to deliver the Travel Plan.

10.18 Having regard to the above, it is concluded that the proposed development can be satisfactorily accommodated within the adjacent highway and transport networks without adverse impact, subject to those improvements proposed in this Report being progressed and implemented. The scheme is submitted on this basis for the approval of the Highways and Planning Authorities.

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

- 89 - A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

FIGURES

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

N

EAST KETTERING DEVELOPMENT

SITE

Lawrence Walker Ltd Client Project Title Roxhill Developments A14 Junction 10 Business Site Location Plan Church Farm Park, Kettering

Leamington Hastings Drn. Chkd. App. Date Drg. No. CAD Ref Plot Rev SPJ SPJ SPJ 12.04.13 Warks CV23 8DZ Scales. - NTS Figure A - NEW HIGHWAYS TO BE EAST KETTERING PROVIDED BY KETTERING DEVELOPMENT N BUSINESS PARK EAST KETTERING ACCESS POINT (PHASE 1)

EAST KETTERING ACCESS POINT (PHASE 2)

SITE PROPOSE D A14 J10A

Lawrence Walker Ltd Client Project Title Roxhill Developments A14 Junction 10 Business Local Highway Network Church Farm Park, Kettering

Leamington Hastings Drn. Chkd. App. Date Drg. No. CAD Ref Plot Rev SPJ SPJ SPJ 12.04.13 Warks CV23 8DZ Scales. - NTS Figure B KEY

1.A6/A5210 ROUNDABOUT FINEDON N 2.KETTERING ROAD/ STATION ROAD 3.KETTERING ROAD/ ALTENDIEZ ROAD 4.A14 JUNCTION 10 5.A14 JUNCTION 9 6.BARTON ROAD/ WOODLAND AVE 7.BARTON ROAD/ CRANFORD ROAD 8.BARTON ROAD/ WARKTON AVE 9.BARTON ROAD/ ST. BOTOLPH’S ROAD 10.BARTON ROAD/ WINDMILL AVE 11.LONDON RD/ BARTON RD/ PYTCHLEY RD 12.HIGH STREET/HIGHAM ROAD 13.A6/ HIGHAM ROAD, BURTON LATIMER 14.WARKTON LANE/ DEEBLE ROAD 21. 15.WINDMILL AVE/ DEEBLE ROAD 16.A6/CRANFORD ROAD 22. 17.A509/FINEDON STATION ROAD 15. 18.A509/STATION ROAD 19.STATION ROAD/POLWELL LANE 14. 20.ALTENDIEZ LANE/POLWELL LANE 23, 24 21.A4300 STAMFORD ROAD/WINDMILL AVE & 25. 22.WINDMILL AVE/ST MARY’S ROAD 11. 10. 23.LONDON ROAD/ROUNDHILL ROAD 9. 8. 24.LONDON ROAD/PIPER’S HILL ROAD 25.LONDON ROAD/HAWTHORN ROAD 7. Other Junctions (Not Shown) 6. 4A. A6003 BARTON ROAD/EoK ACCESS F 4. 26. A14 JUNCTION 3 16. SA1. SITE ACCESS ROUNDABOUT 5. 3. SA2. A6/NEW KETTERING ROAD/PFS 20.

2. 19.

18. 12. 13.

17.

1.

Lawrence Walker Ltd Client Project Title Roxhill Developments A14 Junction 10 Business Junction Location Plan Church Farm Park, Kettering

Leamington Hastings Drn. Chkd. App. Date Drg. No. CAD Ref Plot Rev SPJ SPJ SPJ 12.04.13 Warks CV23 8DZ Scales. - NTS Figure C A EAST KETTERING DEVELOPMENT 49/50 X1

X4

Nearest existing bus stop to site

SITE

Lawrence Walker Ltd Client Project Title Roxhill Developments A14 Junction 10 Business Existing Bus Services Church Farm Park, Kettering

Leamington Hastings Drn. Chkd. App. Date Drg. No. CAD Ref Plot Rev SPJ SPJ SPJ 12.04.13 Warks CV23 8DZ Scales. - NTS Figure D - NEW HIGHWAYS TO BE EAST KETTERING PROVIDED BY KETTERING DEVELOPMENT N BUSINESS PARK EAST KETTERING ACCESS POINT (PHASE 1)

EAST KETTERING ACCESS POINT (PHASE 2)

SITE

1000m walk distance from site access

Lawrence Walker Ltd Client Project Title Roxhill Developments A14 Junction 10 Business Walking Isochrones Church Farm Park, Kettering

Leamington Hastings Drn. Chkd. App. Date Drg. No. CAD Ref Plot Rev SPJ SPJ SPJ 12.04.13 Warks CV23 8DZ Scales. - NTS Figure E N

5km

Lawrence Walker Ltd Client Project Title Roxhill Developments A14 Junction 10 Business Cycling Catchment Area Church Farm Park, Kettering

Leamington Hastings Drn. Chkd. App. Date Drg. No. CAD Ref Plot Rev SPJ SPJ SPJ 12.04.13 Warks CV23 8DZ Scales. - NTS Figure F -

A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

APPENDIX A

Masterplan

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

90 DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE

7a 1 9

8

93.9m

CLOSE SWALLOW Potential Floorspace 81.7m Developable

CRANFORD ROAD 6 Drain Area (NSA) B1a (Office) & BARTON ROAD Plot B1c/B2 B2/B8 91.7m Roadside Uses

185 85.6m Ha Acres m² ft² m² ft² m² ft² Ivanhoe Wilmarie

94.2m 82.0m 82.3m Plot A 0.32 0.81 1,616 17,400

193 81.4m LB Existing footpath Plot B 2.78 6.88 7,674 82,600 6,503 70,000 81.7m

204 CRANFORD ROAD

50 81.1m and cycleway link

El 56 LB

BARTON ROAD Sub Sta Plot C 2.52 6.24 13,025 140,200

201 to Kettering East

38

26

34 Residential Scheme BARTON ROAD

14 Plot D 3.64 9.02 12,553 135,125

210 Pump 2 207 House Plot E 3.61 8.91 14,729 158,550

Shortlane Plot F 6.32 15.62 26,711 287,525

8 Spinney 216

213 Plot G 6.21 15.34 25,476 274,225

4 Pond 218

BARTON ROAD 2 217 93.0m

TDRIVE 2 4 TOTAL 25.40 62.82 9,290 100,000 46,810 503,875 52,187 561,750

TCB

WOODLAND AVENUE

1 108,287

5 TOTAL FLOOR SPACE m²

220 9

225 11

13 1,165,625 ft² Pond Blackbridge Farm

231 POTENTIAL FUTURE DEVELOPABLE AREA (Outside of Application Boundary): 228 1

2 Tanks Tank

Pond 234 Plot H (North) 1.96 4.84 7,868 84,700

LAXTON CT 230

LAXTON 232

239

CT Plot H (South) 2.17 5.37 2,322 25,000 9,977 107,400

238 7

ACORN CLOSE

1 3

5 TOTAL FLOOR SPACE 128,454 m² 240

D

A

OAO

ROA

D RDR 1,382,725 BARTON ROAD Tanks ft²

F 1

NFONFN

3

RAR

CRANFORDCRACRC ROAD 242

ENDON CT

242a 91.1m

244c

5 NSA excludes a 6m landscape strip around site perimeter, a 10m landscape strip to

244 6

244a the A6 frontage and a 5m landscape strip to main estate road. Areas of proposed

244b PLOT G 88.1m structured landscaping are also excluded, except that within Plot F.

8 250 11 PLOT H B1a density based upon 20,000ft²/acre.

252 NORTH 5

15 B1c, B2 & B8 density based upon 40% coverage (17,500ft²/acre)

SALEN CLOSE CLOSE 19

252a A 14 PLOT E

22

23 254

21 PLOT USES:

9

L

' MER

B

' TON

EAST Alignment of link

B

'

FORD

11 A14 A6 Plot A: B1a offices or roadside uses (possible pub/restaurant)

subject to agreed

C C C Plot B: B1a offices or roadside and ancillary uses (hotel, pub, creche, ancillary retail, 35

13 layout

39 C car showroom, trade counter) to frontage with B1c/B2 behind.

38

15

46

17 ALL Plot C: B1c or B2 with high office content. Possible education uses. ROUTES A6

A14 (W)

H

29 Plot D: B1c/B2 with high office content fronting access road 26 1 Plot E: B1c/B2 with high office content fronting spine road

C

28

L

' YATELEY MER

DRIVE

B '

TON Tr

Playground C

B '

FORD Plot F: B2/B8 with maximum 150,000ft² footprint ROUTES

A6003

KETT A6

' G A6

ALL PLOT F

B

'FORD 36 A6

B 'TON B 'FORD

L Existing ' MER B

'TON

A 14 MER '

L

G L '

'

MER Plot G: B2/B8 with maximum 150,000ft² footprint

TON

'

KETT

B

A6003

FORD

19 ' B A6 PLOT D PLOT H 11 ALL PLOT C hedgerow 9 A6003

ROUTES Plot H: B1a/B1c&B2 to southern half (fronting 10a access), B2/B8 to north. Layout KETTERING to be SOUTH retained subject to final alignment of Junction 10a access road. 89.6m

H

I Windmill

ROUTES

ALL WEST

A 14 A14

I I I I I I I Windmill Cottages I I I I

I I

B '

FORD I Existing highway to be A14

I

A6(E) A6(W) I I I I

stopped up and removed I

I

P'K

G

' BUS. A6003 I

I KETT Notes: A6

A14(W) A14

KETT

I A6 A6003 I

A14(E) Existing KETT I Ordnance survey licence number 100020449 I CRANFORD ROAD Footpath

I I I PLOT B I

BUS. I I PARK

A6

A6

I B

' B FORD

'FORD Revision: C

H I C C I I A IY 21.12.2012 I

C I Plot A added and Plot Uses note added.

I I

I I

Alignment of link I B IY 02.01.2013 I I I I General revisions.

PARK subject to agreed I Tanks BUS. I

I I C BW 22.01.2013

BEDFORD RIOUTES layout I I

A6 I ALL Site boundaries revised. Internal estate road amended. Retained

I I I I I PLOT I hedgerow added. Schedule & key updated.

Tanks

I Existing footpath D BW 01.03.2013

KETT.

A14

A14

A6 A6

A I LATIMER

BURTON Boundary updated. Plot I removed. Internal estate road updated to

I

I

Tanks I

I alignment of existing footpath and plot boundaries amended I KEY: accordingly. SuDS areas amended as directed. Development schedule updated. E IY 22.03.2013

Mast I I I Tank I Application Site Boundary Suds and Highways updated, total floorspace amended (Plot H south

I I

A6 missed of original calculation)

A14 A6

KETT.

A14 44.82Ha (110.76 acres) KETT. I B'FORD I F IY 30.03.2013

I El Sub Sta Area of land owned by Northants CC to south east corner removed from I

I Plot H

32

I

11 I I G IY 17.07.2013

30 9 Gross Site Area Development Schedule revised to reduce B1a element to 100,000 sq ft

I 16 plus 25,000 sq ft (Plot H)

73 2 32.61Ha (80.58 acres) 10 H IY 06.08.2013 20

I 20 36 Acorn Park Highway and SUDS updated and plot areas revised accordingly. 23

ELM ROAD 22

I Mobile Home Park

1 15

Path (um)

Factory 14

I Potential Future Developable 27

28 27 Area (Subject to j10a)

THE CRESCENT

10 Garden Centre A14 Junction 10

Gas Governor 24 WOODLAND DRIVE 17

POPLAR ROAD Path (um) Business Park Proposed New Highway

El Sub Sta 7 32

Gas Gov 6

14

16

13

1 ALTENDIEZ WAY 1

85.3m

49 Proposed Footpath/Cycleway

6 7

4d 4b

5 4a 4c

KETTERING ROAD El Sub Sta 4

4b

8 12 2a

2 4a

15 4 1 Rectory Plantation 2d COPPICE CL Existing Footpath ROW to be

2c 3 HURST CL 2b 2 1a 4 2a

7 4a 35 3a

2a 1 6a

2 6

CRANFORD ROAD Retained 3 1 83.2m

El Sub Sta 1a 2

1 Stephen George & Partners LLP 1

5 13

33 8 www.stephengeorge.co.uk

8a SPINNEY ROAD Proposed Structured

10

14a 14

12 12a

78.0m 10a 21 Landscaping Development Framework Plan 16 El Sub Sta 1 2

COPSE 23

CLOSE FOREST CLOSE

23 3 6 32

22 Drawing Status: Preliminary 16 Proposed Water as part of 28 LB Path (um) SuDS CAD Reference: 8828 K002

Drawn: BW 13

35 Date: 12/2010

N 0m 100m 200m 34 Scale: 1:2,500 @ A1

Double Dug Spinney 1:2,500 @ A1 Hall Pond Cottage Project No: Drawing No: Rev: 46 Lansom Close

49 8828 K002 H 3 28 This drawing, the works and concepts depicted are copyright of the consultant and may not be reproduced or made use of, either directly or indirectly without express written consent. Do not scale off this drawing. All heights, levels, sizes and dimensions to be checked on site before any work is put to hand. A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

APPENDIX B

TA Scoping Correspondence

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

Friday, 1 March 2013 16:08:53 Greenwich Mean Time

Subject: Fwd: Land Use Budget.pdf Date: Friday, 1 March 2013 14:06:46 Greenwich Mean Time From: Steve Johnstone

FYI.

Steve

Sent from my iPad somewhere in the UK.

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Mason-Walsh, Lou" Date: 1 March 2013 14:00:54 GMT To: Steve Johnstone , Chris Bond Cc: Richard Hall , Kate Bedson , "[email protected]" , Graham Stevenson , "[email protected]" Subject: RE: Land Use Budget.pdf

Steve,

Thanks for your latest update,

Apologies the revised light vehicle trip rates are set out below;

AM PM In Out In Out B1a 299 49 35 244 B1c 43 8 6 36 B2 112 50 27 92 B8 51 21 16 54 505 129 83 427

The Trip rate data submitted by yourself did not provide the split between Light and Heavy vehicles that was required by the NSTM and therefore I extracted new information as set out below in my email of yesterday.

As for the issue with the B8 trip rates, none of the land use categories included in the TRICS printouts attached to the Coventry report include B8 data according to the definitions of the land uses in TRICS.

In addition it is also important to note that these trip rates will need to be agreed with the HA.

Regards LouLou

Page 1 of 8 Lou Mason-Walsh BA (Hons) MCIHT Senior Transport Planner Northamptonshire Highways Riverside House, Riverside Way, Northampton, NN1 5NX DDI: +44(0)1604 364377 Web: www.mgwsp.co.uk;

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. Thank you

CONFIDENTIAL This e-mail is confidential to the named recipient. If you have received a copy in error, please destroy it. You may not use or disclose the contents of this e-mail to anyone, nor take copies of it. The only copies permitted are (1) by the named recipient and (2) for the purposes of completing successful electronic transmission to the named recipient and then only on the condition that these copies, with this notice attached, are kept confidential until destruction.

May Gurney Ltd, Registered Office: Trowse, Norwich, Norfolk NR14 8SZ Registered Number 00873179 England WSP UK Limited, Registered Office: WSP House, 70 Chancery Lane, London, WC2A 1AF Registered Number 01383511 England

From: Steve Johnstone [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 01 March 2013 11:58 To: Mason-Walsh, Lou; Chris Bond Cc: Richard Hall; Kate Bedson; [email protected]; Graham Stevenson; [email protected] Subject: Re: Land Use Budget.pdf

Lou.

Thanks for this.

The B1c Trip Rates I supplied come from 15 sites if you refer to the Coventry Report and were calibrated against the HCA Employment figures for this type of use, again as itemised in the Report. Your rates are significantly higher and I do not believe that TRICS represents the B1c classification well. I would thus wish to stick with my own data, as this was agreed with the HA for a major scheme less than six months ago, as well as WCC and Coventry City Councils on the A45. Notwithstanding that, I think your summary table is in error, as with only 3,146 sqm of B1c floor-space I cannot get to 990 inbound AM trips at a trip rate of about 1.5 per 100 sqm. Should this not be about 60 trips?

There is a mass of B8 information in the Report, as well as the chosen trip rates which are highlighted in my schedule which you sent me back, under the B2/B8 banner. For B2, a factor of 133% was used, so the quoted rates are just for B8. Your values below do seem rather low in comparison. The B2 is fine.

I will forward the Roadside Uses later.

Regards,

Steve.

----- Original Message ----- From: Mason-Walsh, Lou

Page 2 of 8 To: Steve Johnstone ; Chris Bond Cc: Richard Hall ; Kate Bedson ; Price, Jonathan ([email protected]) ; Graham Stevenson ; [email protected] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 4:23 PM Subject: RE: Land Use Budget.pdf

Steve,

Thank you for the recent information sent through in relation to the proposed development at A14 Junction 10. I have extracted the proposed volume of development from the document sent through to Chris Bond yesterday (attached -208478080) the assumed total development quantum is as follows;

Land Use Size (m2) B1a 21,101 B1c 3,146 B2 25,142 B8 71,654

It was greed that the trip rates agreed for Kettering East would be used in the assessment of this development where possible and to this end the employment trip rates were as follows;

Total Vehicles AM PM In Out In Out 1.42 0.23 0.16 1.16

Light Vehicles

AM PM In Out In Out 1.42 0.23 0.16 1.16

Heavy Vehicles AM PM In Out In Out 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00

The email this morning agreed that these trip rates were suitable for use in assessing the proposed B1a land uses on the site. To aid with the determination of the trip rates with the other land uses (attached – Proposed Trip Rates) I have checked the submitted trip rates and on the whole they are agreed as suitable for use in the assessment of the proposed development.

However, as the model requires the trip data for two land uses in the interests of expediency I have extracted this data from the TRICS database the resulting trip rates are as follows;

Page 3 of 8 Total Vehicles AM PM AM PM In Out In Out B1c 1.405 0.28 0.195 1.151 B2 0.465 0.226 0.116 0.375

Light Vehicles AM PM AM PM In Out In Out B1c 1.382 0.263 0.188 1.143 B2 0.444 0.199 0.106 0.367

Heavy Vehicles AM PM AM PM In Out In Out B1c 0.023 0.017 0.007 0.008 B2 0.021 0.027 0.01 0.008

The information sent through this morning did not include any trip rates for the B8 land uses proposed on site and therefore I have extracted trip rates for this land use from the TRICS database for the Warehousing (Commercial) land use category as set out in the TRICS database. The resulting trip rates for this land use are as follows;

Total Vehicles AM PM AM PM In Out In Out B8 0.084 0.044 0.032 0.084

Light Vehicles AM PM AM PM In Out In Out B8 0.071 0.03 0.022 0.076

Heavy Vehicles AM PM AM PM In Out In Out B8 0.013 0.014 0.01 0.008

The trip rates that will be entered in to the NSTM as a result are as follows;

Light Vehicles AM PM In Out In Out B1a 299 49 35 244 B1c 990 188 135 819 B2 112 50 27 92 B8 51 21 16 54 1452 309 212 1210

Page 4 of 8 Heavy Vehicles AM PM In Out In Out B1a 1 1 0 0 B1c 1 1 0 0 B2 5 7 3 2 B8 9 10 7 6 16 18 10 8

Further to your email of this morning (below) clarification as to what is included in the land use listed as “Roadside” is still outstanding and as a result the trip rates associated are still outstanding.

Regards Lou Lou Mason-Walsh BA (Hons) MCIHT Senior Transport Planner Northamptonshire Highways Riverside House, Riverside Way, Northampton, NN1 5NX DDI: +44(0)1604 364377 Web: www.mgwsp.co.uk;

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. Thank you

CONFIDENTIAL This e-mail is confidential to the named recipient. If you have received a copy in error, please destroy it. You may not use or disclose the contents of this e-mail to anyone, nor take copies of it. The only copies permitted are (1) by the named recipient and (2) for the purposes of completing successful electronic transmission to the named recipient and then only on the condition that these copies, with this notice attached, are kept confidential until destruction.

May Gurney Ltd, Registered Office: Trowse, Norwich, Norfolk NR14 8SZ Registered Number 00873179 England WSP UK Limited, Registered Office: WSP House, 70 Chancery Lane, London, WC2A 1AF Registered Number 01383511 England

From: Steve Johnstone [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 28 February 2013 08:09 To: Chris Bond Cc: Mason-Walsh, Lou; Richard Hall; Kate Bedson Subject: Re: Land Use Budget.pdf

Chris.

Thanks for this.

I am happy with the rates provided by MGWSP for B1a uses but they are excessive for B1c, which forms a significant part of the Kettering development. I therefore enclose a 2102 summary sheet from Roxhill's Coventry & Warwickshire Gateway (C&WG) scheme that was

Page 5 of 8 approved by the HA, Coventry City Council and Warwickshire County Council. It provides B1c trips rates that I would propose to use at Kettering and also B8 rates. B2 rates were taken as being 133% of the B8 figure. As supporting data, I enclose the complete C&WG Report that identifies how each trip rate was derived. An 81% car usage figure is proposed, as per the Coventry data.

I will forward proposals for the Roadside Uses later today.

Steve.

----- Original Message ----- From: Chris Bond To: 'Steve Johnstone' Cc: 'Mason-Walsh, Lou' ; Richard Hall Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 4:54 PM Subject: FW: Land Use Budget.pdf

Steve,

We have reviewed the sheet you gave us. Please see MGWSP’s comment below. Please provide the rates you propose to use for the other uses.

cheers

Chris Bond Team Leader - Development Management Highways, Transport and Infrastructure Northamptonshire County Council Riverside House Riverside Way Northampton NN1 5NX (01604) 364317

Unless explicitly stated to the contrary, the contents of this email are the views, observations and recommendations of an officer issued in good faith based on information available to them at that time. As such they are not binding on the officer or the County Council. Any views, observations or recommendations are issued without prejudice to any views observations or recommendations of Northamptonshire County Council as Local Highway Authority.

From: Mason-Walsh, Lou [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 27 February 2013 16:19 To: Chris Bond Subject: RE: Land Use Budget.pdf

Chris,

Thanks for this latest information further to our discussion please find the Kettering East Trip rates that should be used for the B1 land uses

Employment - B1 (100 m2) AM PM In Out In Out 1.421 0.237 0.164 1.16

Page 6 of 8

As the proposed development includes elements of B2, B8 and “Roadside” these trips rates need to be agreed as soon as possible to enable the modelling of the proposed development.

Regards Lou Lou Mason-Walsh BA (Hons) MCIHT Senior Transport Planner Northamptonshire Highways Riverside House, Riverside Way, Northampton, NN1 5NX DDI: +44(0)1604 364377 Web: www.mgwsp.co.uk;

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. Thank you

CONFIDENTIAL This e-mail is confidential to the named recipient. If you have received a copy in error, please destroy it. You may not use or disclose the contents of this e-mail to anyone, nor take copies of it. The only copies permitted are (1) by the named recipient and (2) for the purposes of completing successful electronic transmission to the named recipient and then only on the condition that these copies, with this notice attached, are kept confidential until destruction.

May Gurney Ltd, Registered Office: Trowse, Norwich, Norfolk NR14 8SZ Registered Number 00873179 England WSP UK Limited, Registered Office: WSP House, 70 Chancery Lane, London, WC2A 1AF Registered Number 01383511 England

-----Original Message----- From: Chris Bond [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 27 February 2013 15:49 To: Mason-Walsh, Lou Subject: FW: Land Use Budget.pdf

See attached. Please check and comment

Chris Bond Team Leader - Development Management Highways, Transport and Infrastructure Northamptonshire County Council Riverside House Riverside Way Northampton NN1 5NX (01604) 364317

Unless explicitly stated to the contrary, the contents of this email are the views, observations and recommendations of an officer issued in good faith based on information available to them at that time. As such they are not binding on the officer or the County Council. Any views, observations or recommendations are issued without prejudice to any views observations or recommendations of Northamptonshire County Council as Local Highway Authority.

Page 7 of 8

-----Original Message----- From: Steve Johnstone [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 27 February 2013 13:44 To: Chris Bond Subject: Land Use Budget.pdf

------This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or organisation to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender either by return of e-mail or by ringing the County Council's main switchboard on (0)300 1261000. The information contained in this e-mail and in your reply may be subject to disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 or other legislation and its confidentiality cannot be guaranteed. This e-mail has been checked for the presence of computer viruses. Northamptonshire County Council. http://www.northamptonshire.gov.uk ------This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or organisation to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender either by return of e-mail or by ringing the County Council's main switchboard on (0)300 1261000. The information contained in this e-mail and in your reply may be subject to disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 or other legislation and its confidentiality cannot be guaranteed. This e-mail has been checked for the presence of computer viruses.

Page 8 of 8 A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

APPENDIX C

Transport Strategy – Highway Layout Plans

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

Bg

CTV Tp

Lp

BARTON ROAD

Bg

42 2

CTV

St

Av

Lp

2a 4 2

CTV

Fh

Mkr Cbox

244 Tp BT

CTV

Lp

PInv

PInv

CTV

50 2

CTV

St

Lp 252

CTV

St

15

2a 5 2

St Tp Lp Fh Sv

Mkr CTV

Gy

54 2 Sp

Lp

Sp

Sp

IB

RD O DF Sp BE Gy

Lp

A6

14W A

Er

14E A ER IM T A L

Gy

Lp ON URT B Cbox Lp Lp Gy

ICU Gy Sp Lp Lp ICU C1 Gy

Lp Sp Lp Gy

38

Gy

Sp 46

Sp Gy

Lp Lp Sp

Gy Gy

Gy C7

Gy

Gy

Lp Lp

Gy

Sp Gy Gy

Gy

Gy

Sp

Sp Gy Lp

Sp 6003 C2

KETT

A6

BFORD Sp BTON Lp L FULL Sp Gy

Lp Sp

Lp

Gy Sp Sp Gy A14E A6003 A 14 Lp A6 KETTG CCTV Gy BFORD Gy Lp Gy

Sp Gy Gy Lp

Sp

Post

TG T E K

6003 A

RD BSO A6

Gy Lp

Sp C6

Sp

N O E N T R Y Lp

A14E A6003 A6 KETTG Sp Sp Gy

Lp Gy

Gy

Lp Gy

Gy

ICU

Gy Lp

Gy Sp ICU Lp Sp Gy Lp PInv Sp Gy ICU C5 Sp

ICU Gy Sp ICU Sp Gy Gy IB Gy Gy Gy Gy Sp A6003 Gy

Sp Lp KETTG

A14E

A6003 KETT Sp A14E BUR Gy Lp LATI Sp Lp Lp A14W A14 Lp

WEST

Sp A14 JUNCTION 10 Lp Gy Lp C4 Gy BUSINESS PARK

ICU Lp OTHER IB Post A14 ROUTES Post

WEST Gy

Lp ONLY

PInv

Sp

Gy Sp TH DA

consulting engineerse-mail www.thda.co.uk GENERAL ARRANGEMENT SHEET 1 OF 4

Lp Drawing Status: PLANNING CAD Reference: See bottom left corner Drawn: RDT Date: SEPT. '13

Gy Scale @A1: 1:500

Project No: Drawing No: Rev: 10-0495 SK16 -

This drawing, the works and concepts depicted are copyright of the consultant and may not be reproduced or made use of, either directly or indirectly without express written consent. All heights, levels, sizes and dimensions to be checked on site before any work is put to hand.

T:\10-0495 - A14 Jn 10 Business Park Kettering\acad\SK16-SK19 GA FOR SAFETY AUDIT.dwg, SK16, 16/09/2013 10:10:37 Lp

Gy

Gy Gy G= Lp MG

G= 0.6m

G= MG

G= MG G= MG

Gy

Gy G= MG

G= MG

Lp

Tp

Tp

Gy

Gy

Lp

Sv Wo Gy Sv Wo Gy Sv

Y1

Lp

Bg

K13

Stay

Lp

G= MG Ep G= G= G= MG G= MG MG MG Ep Ep Stay Ep

Stay

Gy

Lp Gy

Gy

Y2

PInv Gy

Lp PInv

Sp Sp

PInv

Gy

G= MG

Lp G= MG

G= Gy 0.3m

G= MG

G= 0.15m

G= 0.15m

G= 0.2m

G= Lp 0.2m

Gy

Gy

G= MG

G= 0.3m Gy G= MG

Lp G= MG

Gy Lp G= MG Gy IB

G= 0.3m Gy

Lp IB G= 0.3m Y3

G= 0.3m

Gy G= Gy 0.3m Gy Gy

Sp G= G= Sv 0.3m 0.3m Sv

Sap Lp Lp Sap Sap G= G= Sp 0.4m 0.3m Sp Lp Gy Gy G= 0.2m G= 0.3m Lp Lp IB IB Sp Gy A14 JUNCTION 10 Gy

Gy Gy BUSINESS PARK Gy G= Gy MG G= Sap Gy 0.3m G= IB Gy Sp 0.2m G= Sap Sp Gy 0.2m G= Lp 0.3m Y4 G= G= Sp 0.2m 0.3m Lp Gy Sp

G= 0.6m

G= 0.3m

G= 0.8m Sp IB Lp

Lp Gy

G= 0.2m G= 0.9m TH DA G= 0.4m G= MG consulting engineerse-mail Gy Lp www.thda.co.uk G= G= 0.7m 0.5m Gy

Gy GENERAL ARRANGEMENT G= MG G= MG SHEET 2 OF 4

G= MG PLANNING Sp Drawing Status: Sp CAD Reference: See bottom left corner Gy Drawn: RDT PInv Date: SEPT. '13 Av Scale @A1: 1:500

Lp Project No: Drawing No: Rev: Lp 10-0495 SK17 -

This drawing, the works and concepts depicted are copyright of the consultant and may not be reproduced or made use of, either directly or indirectly without express written consent. All heights, levels, sizes and dimensions to be checked on site before any work is put to hand.

T:\10-0495 - A14 Jn 10 Business Park Kettering\acad\SK16-SK19 GA FOR SAFETY AUDIT.dwg, SK17, 16/09/2013 10:11:23 Bin

Bin Sp

Gy Gy

Gy A 6 K10 Gy Gy Gy Gy Gy IB Gy Gy Gy Gy Sp Gy Gy A 6 Gy Gy Gy

Sp Sp

A 6

K12

G= MG G= MG G= G= G= MG MG MG

G= MG

A 6 Gy Gy K1 IB A 6 Gy Gy Gy Gy

Gy Gy

Gy Gy Sp Gy Gy

Bin Gy Bin Sp A14 JUNCTION 10 Gy BUSINESS PARK

MS2 88.320

Gy G= MG

K2

G= MG Gy G= MG Gy

G= G= IB MG MG G= 0.4m Sp TH DA consulting engineers Gy Gy www.thda.co.uk GENERAL ARRANGEMENT SHEET 3 OF 4

Gy Drawing Status: PLANNING CAD Reference: See bottom left corner Drawn: RDT Gy Date: SEPT. '13 Sp Scale @A1: 1:500

Gy Project No: Drawing No: Rev: 10-0495 SK18 - This drawing, the works and concepts depicted are copyright of the consultant and may not be reproduced or made use of, either directly or indirectly without express written consent. All heights, levels, sizes and dimensions to be checked on site before any work is put to hand.

T:\10-0495 - A14 Jn 10 Business Park Kettering\acad\SK16-SK19 GA FOR SAFETY AUDIT.dwg, SK18, 16/09/2013 10:11:52 Gy

G= Gy G= 0.5m G= 0.4m G= 0.4m 0.4m G= Gy G= 0.4m 0.4m

G= Gy 0.5m G= G= G= 0.5m 0.4m MG G= G= 0.3m 0.6m G= Gy MG G= G= 0.5m G= 0.3m 0.4m G= Sp 0.4m G= Gy 0.3m G= G= 0.3m G= 0.4m 0.5m G= 0.5m Gy Gy G= G= Gy 0.3m 0.5m Sp G= Pipe Sp 0.6m G= Lp Gy 0.5m Gy G= 0.5m Sp

Lp

Gy IB Sp

Gy

Gy K3 Sp

IB Gy

Sp

Gy Gy Sp Lp

Lp Gy Sp Gy

Elec

Gy Gy

Sp

Lp Gy Gy

Gy

Gy

Gy

Gy Lp

Gy

Gy

Gy Gy Bg

Lp

Sv

Mkr Gy

Lp

Gy

MS1 IB

Bg

Elec

Lp

Elec Lp Elec

Bg Bg Elec Sp

IB

Gy Lp IB IB Sp Sp

Gy Gy Gy Gy Gy Lp Gy

Sp Gy Gy Sp Gy Lp Lp

Sp Sp

Gy Gy Lp

Gy

Gy

Gy Sp

Lp

Gy

Gy L1 87.309 Gy

Sp

Cbox

73 Lp Sp Lp

Tp 40 Gy

Sp

IB 40

Sp L2 Sp 85.134

Gy

23

Gy

Gy

Lp 27

L3 86.886

Garden Centre A14 JUNCTION 10 Tp BUSINESS PARK

Lp TH DA

consulting engineerse-mail www.thda.co.uk

Tp GENERAL ARRANGEMENT 32 SHEET 4 OF 4

Drawing Status: PLANNING CAD Reference: See bottom left corner Drawn: RDT Date: SEPT. '13 Scale @A1: 1:500

Lp Project No: Drawing No: Rev: 10-0495 SK19 -

This drawing, the works and concepts depicted are copyright of the consultant and may not be reproduced or made use of, either directly or indirectly without express written consent. All heights, levels, sizes and dimensions to be checked on site before any work is put to hand.

T:\10-0495 - A14 Jn 10 Business Park Kettering\acad\SK16-SK19 GA FOR SAFETY AUDIT.dwg, SK19, 16/09/2013 10:12:52 A14 Junction 10 Business Park - Kettering September 2013 Transport Assessment

APPENDIX D

Accident Data

C:\LAWRENCE WALKER LIMITED\LWL Projects\Roxhill\Cranford Road (7)\Reports\TA\REPORT - TA - Sep 2013.docx

.(<

 $$5281'$%287),1('21 1  .(77(5,1*52$'67$7,2152$'  .(77(5,1*52$'$/7(1',(=52$'  $-81&7,21  $-81&7,21  %$572152$':22'/$1'$9(  %$572152$'&5$1)25'52$'  %$572152$':$5.721$9(  %$572152$'67%272/3+¶652$'  %$572152$':,1'0,//$9(  /21'215'%$57215'3<7&+/(<5'  +,*+675((7+,*+$052$'  $+,*+$052$'%85721/$7,0(5  :$5.721/$1('((%/(52$'   :,1'0,//$9('((%/(52$'  $&5$1)25'52$'   $),1('2167$7,2152$'  $67$7,2152$'   67$7,2152$'32/:(///$1(   $/7(1',(=/$1(32/:(///$1(    $67$0)25'52$':,1'0,//$9(  :,1'0,//$9(670$5<¶652$'    /21'2152$'5281'+,//52$'   /21'2152$'3,3(5¶6+,//52$'    /21'2152$'+$:7+25152$'  2WKHU-XQFWLRQV 1RW6KRZQ  $$%$572152$'(R. $&&(66)  $-81&7,21 6$6,7($&&(665281'$%287  6$$1(:.(77(5,1*52$'3)6     -81&7,21/2&$7,21

3,$678'<$5($    

 

6WXG\$UHDDQG3,$

5()73,$ TRAFFMAP SUMMARY REPORT Run on: 23/08/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Data Request Kettering et al. Junctions 3,2,12,13 and 16. 5 Years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013.

Casualties Ftl Causation Ped Road Vehicle Police Ref. Acc Class Date Time Grid References Ser Slt Factors/ Prob L M D Light Weather Surface Types NK379709 Slight 12/09/2009 1108 490063 274696 0 0 1 405V1A 706V1B 5 1 2LightFine without high winds Dry 11 802C1B 803C1A 808C1B 810C1B TK194610 Serious 11/05/2010 1930 490822 275051 0 1 1 406V2A 0 0 0LightFine without high winds Dry 19 9 TK801310 Fatal 08/07/2010 1851 490808 274632 1 0 0 403V1A 0 0 0LightFine without high winds Dry 5 21 NK431910 Slight 27/10/2010 1600 489696 275622 0 0 1 0 0 0LightFine without high winds Dry 9 5 NK515510 Slight 18/12/2010 0823 490530 275935 0 0 1 403V1A 406V1A 0 0 0LightFine without high winds Wet/Damp 9 21 NK533010 Slight 25/12/2010 1730 490835 275569 0 0 1 410V1A 0 0 0DarkFine without high winds Frost/Ice 9 9 NK063411 Slight 09/02/2011 0709 490149 274350 0 0 1 0 0 0DarkFine without high winds Wet/Damp 9 9 NK060211 Slight 11/02/2011 0930 490690 275810 0 0 1 0 0 0LightFine without high winds Dry 9 21 NK144511 Slight 25/04/2011 1420 490693 275816 0 0 2 602V1A 402V1A 0 0 0LightFine without high winds Dry 9 9 9 405V1A 406V1A NK147911 Slight 29/04/2011 2020 490329 275979 0 0 6 0 0 0DarkFine without high winds Dry 9 9 NK214911 Slight 22/06/2011 2319 490076 274782 0 0 1 401V1A 403V1A 0 0 0DarkFine without high winds Wet/Damp 9 410V1A 605V1A NK248911 Serious 21/07/2011 0108 490824 274936 0 1 0 806C1A 809C1A 5 1 5DarkFine without high winds Dry 9 802C1A 405V1B NK034912 Slight 07/02/2012 0730 490820 274881 0 0 2 103V2A 403V1A 0 0 0LightFog or mist Wet/Damp 19 9 405V1A 406V1A 707V1A NK069112 Slight 13/03/2012 1720 490047 274572 0 0 1 5 1 3LightFine without high winds Dry 9 NKO80312 Slight 21/03/2012 1700 490051 274615 0 0 1 0 0 0LightFine without high winds Dry 9 9 nk087312 Slight 04/04/2012 1351 490781 274131 0 0 1 103V1A 107V1B 0 0 0LightRaining without high winds Wet/Damp 9 9 9 405V1A 406V1A 408V2A NK137412 Serious 09/06/2012 2315 490704 275812 0 1 3 0 0 0DarkFine without high winds Dry 9 TK801912 Fatal 10/06/2012 2230 490710 275801 1 0 0 0 0 0DarkFine without high winds Wet/Damp 9 NK173512 Serious 11/07/2012 2048 490709 275804 0 2 0 307V1A 501V1B 0 0 0LightRaining without high winds Wet/Damp 9 NK286812 Slight 08/11/2012 2006 490017 274806 0 0 1 701V1A 801C1A 5 4 6DarkFine without high winds Dry 9 805C1B 808C1A TK803512 Fatal 30/12/2012 1149 490795 274423 2 2 0 0 0 0LightFine without high winds Dry 9 9 NK035013 Slight 16/02/2013 1030 490785 274032 0 0 2 302V1A 405V1A 0 0 0LightFine without high winds Dry 9 9 406V1A 706V1B

Registered to:NCC-MGWSP 1 TRAFFMAP SUMMARY REPORT Run on: 23/08/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Data Request Kettering et al. Junctions 3,2,12,13 and 16. 5 Years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013.

Casualties Ftl Causation Ped Road Vehicle Police Ref. Acc Class Date Time Grid References Ser Slt Factors/ Prob L M D Light Weather Surface Types

Column Totals 47 0

Total number of accidents listed: 22

Registered to:NCC-MGWSP 2 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Data Request Kettering et al. Junctions 3,2,12,13 and 16. 5 Years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013.

Polic NK379709 12/09/2009 Easting: 490,063Northing: 274,696 Saturday Time: 1108 Vehicles11 Casualties Severity: Slight Road surface: Dry Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Daylight:street lights present Specia Road Type: Acc Desc: PED1 WAS WALKING ALONG SIDE V1 ABOUT TO BOARD IT. V1 STARTS TO MOVE OFF CAUSING PED1 TO STUMBLE AND BECOME WEDGED BETWEEN CURB AND V1.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Failed to look properly Vehicle 1 Very Likely 2nd: Dazzling sun Vehicle 1 Possible 3rd: Failed to look properly Casualty 1 Very Likely 4th: Failed to judge vehicles path or speed Casualty 1 Very Likely 5th: Careless/Reckless/In a hurry Casualty 1 Possible 6th: Disability or illness, mental or physical Casualty 1 Possible

Occurred on C4, HIGH STREET, BURTON LATIMER. 18M NE OF THE D2020, DUKE STREET.

Vehicl 1 Bus or coach Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Did not impact Age o 53 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: SW to NE Driver Postcode: NN81EW FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Journey as part of work

Casualty Reference:189 Age: Female Pedestrian Severity: Slight Pedestrian Direction: NE

Polic TK194610 11/05/2010 Easting: 490,822Northing: 275,051 Tuesday Time: 1930 Vehicles22 CasualtiesSeverity: Serious Road surface: Dry Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Daylight:street lights present Specia Road Type: Acc Desc: V1 WAS OVERTAKING V2. V2 THEN MOVES INTO THE PATH OF V1. DRIVER OF V1 SOUNDS HIS HORN CASUING V2 TO OVER CORRECT AND VEHICLES TO COLLIDE. V1 OVERTURNS AND EJECTS FRONT SEAT PASSENGER.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Failed to judge other persons path or speed Vehicle 2 Very Likely 2nd: 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on A6, BURTON LATIMER. 800M S OF THE C139, CRANFORD ROAD.

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 1 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Data Request Kettering et al. Junctions 3,2,12,13 and 16. 5 Years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013. Vehicl 1 Goods <= 3.5 tonnes mgw Overtaking moving vehicle on its offside Not in restricted lane Overturned First point of impact: Front Age o31 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: N to S Driver Postcode: NN109LZ FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Commuting to/from work

Casualty Reference:141 Age: Male Passenger Severity: Serious

Casualty Reference:231 Age: Male Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Vehicl 2 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane Skidded First point of impact: Front Age o37 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: N to S Driver Postcode: NN100RJ FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Commuting to/from work

Polic TK801310 08/07/2010 Easting: 490,808Northing: 274,632 Thursday Time: 1851 Vehicles2 Casualties 1 Severity: Fatal Road surface: Dry Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Daylight:street lights present Specia Road Type: Acc Desc: V1 WHICH WAS TRAVELLING N ALONG THE A6 OVERTAKES SEVERAL VEHICLES BUT FAILS TO RETURN TO THE CORRECT SIDE OF THE ROAD AND COLLIDES WITH V2 WHICH WAS TRAVELLINGIN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Poor turn or manoevre Vehicle 1 Very Likely 2nd: 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on A6, BURTON LATIMER BYPASS, BURTON LATIMER. 600M N OF THE C4, HIGHAM ROAD.

Vehicl 1 Motorcycle over 500cc Overtaking moving vehicle on its offside Not in restricted lane Overturned First point of impact: Front Age o65 Breat Not provide Vehicle direction: S to N Driver Postcode: NN155LS FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:165 Age: Male Driver/rider Severity: Fatal

Vehicl 2 Goods >= 7.5 tonnes mgw Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o52 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: N to S Driver Postcode: NN82LX FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Journey as part of work

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 2 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Data Request Kettering et al. Junctions 3,2,12,13 and 16. 5 Years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013.

Polic NK431910 27/10/2010 Easting: 489,696Northing: 275,622 Wednesday Time: 1600 Vehicles21 Casualties Severity: Slight Road surface: Dry Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Daylight:street lights present Specia Road Type: Single carriageway Acc Desc: RIDER OF V2 FALLS FROM HIS BIKE. V1 EXITS THE RAB AND COLLIDES WITH RIDER AND V2.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: 2nd: 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on C4, KETTERING ROAD, BURTON LATIMER. AT THE RAB WITH THE U7408, ALTENDIEZ WAY.

Vehicl 1 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o Breat Not requested Vehicle direction: S to N Driver Postcode: Unknown FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known Vehicl 2 Motorcycle over 500cc Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Back Age o 30 Breat Not requested Vehicle direction: S to N Driver Postcode: NN155WD FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:130 Age: Male Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Polic NK515510 18/12/2010 Easting: 490,530Northing: 275,935 Saturday Time: 0823 Vehicles21 Casualties Severity: Slight Road surface: Wet/Damp Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Daylight:street lights present Specia Road Type: Acc Desc: V1 PULLS OUT OF CRANFORD ROAD ONTO A6 INFRONT OF V2 AND FAILS TO SPEED UP. V1 THEN MOVES TO THE O/S TO PERFORM A U-TURN. BEFORE THIS MANOEUVRE IS COMPLETE V2 COLLIDES WITH THE REAR OF V1.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Poor turn or manoevre Vehicle 1 Very Likely 2nd: Failed to judge other persons path or speed Vehicle 1 Very Likely 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 3 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Data Request Kettering et al. Junctions 3,2,12,13 and 16. 5 Years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013. Occurred on A6, N/B, BURTON LATIMER. 227M NW OF THE C139, CRANFORD ROAD.

Vehicl 1 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Back Age o 33 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: SE to NW Driver Postcode: NN155NA FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:133 Age: Male Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Vehicl 2 Goods >= 7.5 tonnes mgw Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o 50 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: SE to NW Driver Postcode: NN95DW FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Journey as part of work

Polic NK533010 25/12/2010 Easting: 490,835Northing: 275,569 Saturday Time: 1730 Vehicles21 Casualties Severity: Slight Road surface: Frost/Ice Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Darkness: no street lighting Specia Road Type: Acc Desc: DRIVER OF V1 LOSES CONTROL OF VEHICLE AND CROSSES THE CENTRE WHITE LINE COLLIDING WITH V2 WHICH WAS TRAVELLING IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Loss of control Vehicle 1 Very Likely 2nd: 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on A6, BURTON LATIMER. 300M S OF THE C139, CRANFORD ROAD.

Vehicl 1 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o 28 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: S to N Driver Postcode: NN140XR FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known Vehicl 2 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o66 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: N to S Driver Postcode: NN141PH FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:163 Age: Female Passenger Severity: Slight

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 4 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Data Request Kettering et al. Junctions 3,2,12,13 and 16. 5 Years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013.

Polic NK063411 09/02/2011 Easting: 490,149Northing: 274,350 Wednesday Time: 0709 Vehicles21 Casualties Severity: Slight Road surface: Wet/Damp Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Darkness: street lights present and lit Specia Road Type: Single carriageway Acc Desc: V1 HAS EDGED OUT OF JCT AND INTO THE PATH OF V2 WHICH WAS TRAVELLING SE ALONG HIGHAM ROAD.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: 2nd: 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on C4, HIGHAM ROAD, BURTOM LATIMER. AT THE JCT WITH CORNFIELD ROAD.

Vehicl 1 Car Turning right Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o 48 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: NE to NW Driver Postcode: NN155YP FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Commuting to/from work

Casualty Reference:148 Age: Male Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Vehicl 2 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o30 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: NWSEto Driver Postcode: NN155FF FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Commuting to/from work

Polic NK060211 11/02/2011 Easting: 490,690 Northing: 275,810 Friday Time: 0930 Vehicles21 Casualties Severity: Slight Road surface: Dry Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Daylight:street lights present Specia Road Type: Dual carriageway Acc Desc: V1 FAILS TO STOP IN TIME AND COLLIDES WITH THE REAR OF V2 WHICH WAS STATIONARY WAITING TO JOIN THE A6.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: 2nd: 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 5 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Data Request Kettering et al. Junctions 3,2,12,13 and 16. 5 Years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013. Occurred on C139, CRANFORD ROAD, BURTON LATIMER. AT THE JCT WITH THE A6.

Vehicl 1 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o Breat Not requested Vehicle direction: SW to NE Driver Postcode: Unknown FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known Vehicl 2 Goods >= 7.5 tonnes mgw Waiting to go ahead but held up Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Back Age o35 Breat Not requested Vehicle direction: SW to NE Driver Postcode: NN142FF FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:135 Age: Male Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Polic NK144511 25/04/2011 Easting: 490,693Northing: 275,816 Monday Time: 1420 Vehicles32 Casualties Severity: Slight Road surface: Dry Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Daylight:street lights present Specia Road Type: 5 Acc Desc: V1 HAD STARTED TO PULL OUT OF JCT. V2 STARTS TO TURN INTO CRANFORD ROAD AND CONTINUES TO DRIVE OFF. V3 WHICH WAS TRAVELLING NW ALONG A6 COLLIDES WITH V1 WHICH WAS WAITING IN THE C/WAY TO TURN.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Careless/Reckless/In a hurry Vehicle 1 Very Likely 2nd: Junction restart Vehicle 1 Very Likely 3rd: Failed to look properly Vehicle 1 Very Likely 4th: Failed to judge other persons path or speed Vehicle 1 Very Likely 5th: 6th:

Occurred on A6, BURTON LATIMER. AT THE JCT WITH THE C139, CRANFORD ROAD.

Vehicl 1 Car Waiting to turn right Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o Breat Negative Vehicle direction: SW to NE Driver Postcode: NN155NP FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:212 Age: Male Passenger Severity: Slight

Vehicl 2 Car Turning right Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Did not impact Age o Breat Driver no Vehicle direction: NWSWto Driver Postcode: Unknown FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 6 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Data Request Kettering et al. Junctions 3,2,12,13 and 16. 5 Years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013. Vehicl 3 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o28 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: SE to NW Driver Postcode: LE169RZ FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:128 Age: Female Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Polic NK147911 29/04/2011 Easting: 490,329Northing: 275,979 Friday Time: 2020 Vehicles26 Casualties Severity: Slight Road surface: Dry Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Darkness: street lighting unknown Specia Road Type: Acc Desc: V1 STARTS TO TURN RIGHT INTO LAYBY ON OPPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROAD. AS V1 STARTS TO TURN V2 OVERTAKES V1. V2 COLLIDES WITH THE FRONT O/S OF V1.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: 2nd: 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on A6, BURTON LATIMER. 581M E OF THE A14 JCT 10.

Vehicl 1 Car Turning right Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o46 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: WSto Driver Postcode: NN142FH FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:327 Age: Male Passenger Severity: Slight

Casualty Reference:429 Age: Male Passenger Severity: Slight

Casualty Reference:546 Age: Male Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Casualty Reference:636 Age: Female Passenger Severity: Slight

Vehicl 2 Car Overtaking moving vehicle on its offside Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o 51 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: WEto Driver Postcode: NN100RH FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 7 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Data Request Kettering et al. Junctions 3,2,12,13 and 16. 5 Years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013. Casualty Reference:151 Age: Male Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Casualty Reference:260 Age: Female Passenger Severity: Slight

Polic NK214911 22/06/2011 Easting: 490,076Northing: 274,782 Wednesday Time: 2319 Vehicles11 Casualties Severity: Slight Road surface: Wet/Damp Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Darkness: street lights present and lit Specia Road Type: 5 Acc Desc: DRIVER OF V1 FAILS TO NEGOTIATE RIGHT TURN INTO CHURCHILL WAY AND COLLIDES WITH BOLLARD ON THE N/S.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Junction overshoot Vehicle 1 Very Likely 2nd: Poor turn or manoevre Vehicle 1 Very Likely 3rd: Loss of control Vehicle 1 Very Likely 4th: Inexperienced or learner driver/rider Vehicle 1 Very Likely 5th: 6th:

Occurred on U7400, CHURCHILL WAY, BURTON LATIMER. AT THE JCT WITH THE C4, HIGH STREET.

Vehicl 1 Car Turning right Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o26 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: N to NW Driver Postcode: NN155PB FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:126 Age: Male Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Polic NK248911 21/07/2011 Easting: 490,824Northing: 274,936 Thursday Time: 0108 Vehicles1 Casualties1 Severity: Serious Road surface: Dry Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Darkness: no street lighting Specia Road Type: Acc Desc: V1 TRAVELLING S ALONG A6 WHEN IT COLLIDES WITH PED1WHO WAS IN THE C/WAY WEARING DARK CLOTHING.

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 8 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Data Request Kettering et al. Junctions 3,2,12,13 and 16. 5 Years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Impaired by alcohol Casualty 1 Very Likely 2nd: Pedestrian wearing dark clothing at night Casualty 1 Very Likely 3rd: Failed to look properly Casualty 1 Possible 4th: Failed to look properly Vehicle 1 Possible 5th: 6th:

Occurred on A6, BURTON LATIMER. 900M N OF THE C4, HIGHAM ROAD.

Vehicl 1 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o59 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: N to S Driver Postcode: NN81PT FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:127 Age: Male Pedestrian Severity: Serious Pedestrian Direction: S

Polic NK034912 07/02/2012 Easting: 490,820 Northing: 274,881 Tuesday Time: 0730 Vehicles22 CasualtiesSeverity: Slight Road surface: Wet/Damp Weather: Fog or mist Light: Daylight: no street lighting Specia Road Type: Acc Desc: V1 STARTS TO DO A U-TURN IN THE C/WAY WHEN V2 COLLIDES WITH THE REAR OF V1.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Slippery road (due to weather) Vehicle 2 Very Likely 2nd: Poor turn or manoevre Vehicle 1 Very Likely 3rd: Failed to look properly Vehicle 1 Very Likely 4th: Failed to judge other persons path or speed Vehicle 1 Very Likely 5th: Rain, sleet, snow, or fog Vehicle 1 Very Likely 6th:

Occurred on A6, BURTON LATIMER. 890M N OF THE C4, HIGHAM ROAD.

Vehicl 1 Goods <= 3.5 tonnes mgw U turn Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Back Age o 64 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: N to N Driver Postcode: ST119HJ FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Commuting to/from work Vehicl 2 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o25 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: N to S Driver Postcode: NN169PH FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Commuting to/from work

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 9 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Data Request Kettering et al. Junctions 3,2,12,13 and 16. 5 Years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013. Casualty Reference:125 Age: Male Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Casualty Reference:219 Age: Female Passenger Severity: Slight

Polic NK069112 13/03/2012 Easting: 490,047Northing: 274,572 Tuesday Time: 1720 Vehicles11 Casualties Severity: Slight Road surface: Dry Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Daylight:street lights present Specia Road Type: Acc Desc: BUS PULLS OVER TO THE N/S TO SEE IF PED1 WANTS TO GET ON. SHE DOESNT DRIVER OF V1 LETS HER CROSS THE ROAD INFRONT. PED1 FAILS TO LOOK AND COLLIDES WITH V1 WHICH WAS OVERTAKING A VEHICLE.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: 2nd: 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on C4, HIGH STREET, BURTON. 58M S OF U7402, PIGOTTS LANE.

Vehicl 1 Car Overtaking stationary vehicle on its offside Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o Breat Not requested Vehicle direction: S to N Driver Postcode: Unknown FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:137 Age: Female Pedestrian Severity: Slight Pedestrian Direction: E

Polic NKO80312 21/03/2012 Easting: 490,051 Northing: 274,615 Wednesday Time: 1700 Vehicles2 Casualties 1 Severity: Slight Road surface: Dry Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Daylight:street lights present Specia Road Type: Single carriageway Acc Desc: V2 TRAVELLING S ON C4 HIGH ST HAS PRIORITY THROUGH ROADSIDE 'BUILD OUTS'. V1 TRAVELLING N ON C4 HIGH ST DOES NOT GIVE WAY TO V2 AND COLLIDES WITH IT.

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 10 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Data Request Kettering et al. Junctions 3,2,12,13 and 16. 5 Years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: 2nd: 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on C4 HIGH ST 10M S OF JCT WITH PIGGOTTS LANE

Vehicl 1 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Did not impact Age o35 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: S to N Driver Postcode: NN169BG FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Journey as part of work Vehicl 2 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o52 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: S to N Driver Postcode: NN169BG FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Journey as part of work

Casualty Reference:152 Age: Female Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Polic nk087312 04/04/2012 Easting: 490,781Northing: 274,131 Wednesday Time: 1351 Vehicles31 Casualties Severity: Slight Road surface: Wet/Damp Weather: Raining without high winds Light: Daylight: no street lighting Specia Road Type: Acc Desc: V2 & 3 ARE STATIONARY ON APPROACH TO ROADWORKS. V1 DRIVES INTO REAR OF V2 WHICH IN TURN COLLIDES WITH V3.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Slippery road (due to weather) Vehicle 1 Very Likely 2nd: Temporary road layout (eg contraflow) Vehicle 1 Possible 3rd: Failed to look properly Vehicle 1 Very Likely 4th: Failed to judge other persons path or speed Vehicle 1 Very Likely 5th: Sudden braking Vehicle 2 Very Likely 6th:

Occurred on A6 100M NORTH OF C4 HIGHAM RD

Vehicl 1 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o 82 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: S to N Driver Postcode: NN160SU FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 11 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Data Request Kettering et al. Junctions 3,2,12,13 and 16. 5 Years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013. Casualty Reference:181 Age: Female Passenger Severity: Slight

Vehicl 2 Car Parked Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Back Age o23 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: Parto Parked Driver Postcode: NN169ED FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Commuting to/from work Vehicl 3 Car Parked Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Back Age o46 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: Parto Parked Driver Postcode: WA145NX FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Journey as part of work

Polic NK137412 09/06/2012 Easting: 490,704Northing: 275,812 Saturday Time: 2315 Vehicles14 CasualtiesSeverity: Serious Road surface: Dry Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Darkness: street lights present but unlit Specia Road Type: Single carriageway Acc Desc: NEWLY CONSTRUCTED RAB WITH LIGHTS UNLTI. V1 FAILED TO SEE RAB, COLLIDES WITH KERB, MOUNTS RAB, LANDS IN MIDDLE OF EXIT OF OPPOSITE CARRIAGEWAY

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: 2nd: 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on A6 ROUNDABOUT BURTON LATIMER WITH U139 CRANFORD ROAD

Vehicl 1 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o22 Breat Not requested Vehicle direction: SE to NW Driver Postcode: NN106EE FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:118 Age: Female Passenger Severity: Slight

Casualty Reference:217 Age: Female Passenger Severity: Slight

Casualty Reference:322 Age: Male Passenger Severity: Serious

Casualty Reference:422 Age: Female Passenger Severity: Slight

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 12 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Data Request Kettering et al. Junctions 3,2,12,13 and 16. 5 Years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013.

Polic TK801912 10/06/2012 Easting: 490,710Northing: 275,801 Sunday Time: 2230 Vehicles11 Casualties Severity: Fatal Road surface: Wet/Damp Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Darkness: no street lighting Specia Road Type: 5 Acc Desc: V1 TRAVELLING NW ON A6 BYPASS WHEN IT FAILS TO NEGOTIATE NEW ROUNDABOUT AT C139 CRANFORD RD. V1 HITS ROUNDABOUT AND OVERTURNS.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: 2nd: 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on ROUNDABOUT OF A6 AND C139 CRANFORD RD

Vehicl 1 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Did not impact Age o 54 Breat Not provide Vehicle direction: SE to NW Driver Postcode: CB75SL FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:154 Age: Male Driver/rider Severity: Fatal

Polic NK173512 11/07/2012 Easting: 490,709 Northing: 275,804 Wednesday Time: 2048 Vehicles12 Casualties Severity: Serious Road surface: Wet/Damp Weather: Raining without high winds Light: Daylight: no street lighting Specia Road Type: 5 Acc Desc: DRIVER OF V1 FAILS TO NEGOTIATE NEW RAB. V1 COLLIDES WITH RAB ISLAND CAUSING V1 TO FLIP OVER SEVERAL TIMES.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Travelling too fast for conditions Vehicle 1 Very Likely 2nd: Impaired by alcohol Vehicle 1 Possible 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on A6, BURTON LATIMER. AT THE RAB WITH THE C139, CRANFORD ROAD.

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 13 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Data Request Kettering et al. Junctions 3,2,12,13 and 16. 5 Years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013. Vehicl 1 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane Overturned First point of impact: Front Age o23 Breat Not provide Vehicle direction: SE to NW Driver Postcode: LE159AB FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:123 Age: Male Driver/rider Severity: Serious

Casualty Reference:222 Age: Female Passenger Severity: Serious

Polic NK286812 08/11/2012 Easting: 490,017 Northing: 274,806 Thursday Time: 2006 Vehicles11 Casualties Severity: Slight Road surface: Dry Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Darkness: street lights present and lit Specia Road Type: Acc Desc: V2 PARKED FACING SE RESTRICTING ROAD WIDTH. PEDESTRIAN RUNS FROM BEHIND V2 INTO PATH OF V1 TRAVELLING NW ON CHURCHILL WAY.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Stationary or parked vehicle Vehicle 1 Very Likely 2nd: Crossed road masked by stationary veh Casualty 1 Very Likely 3rd: Dangerous action in carriageway Casualty 1 Very Likely 4th: Careless/Reckless/In a hurry Casualty 1 Very Likely 5th: 6th:

Occurred on U7400 CHURCHILL WAY 72M NW OF C4 HIGH ST

Vehicl 1 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Did not impact Age o 24 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: SE to NW Driver Postcode: Unknown FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Commuting to/from work

Casualty Reference:113 Age: Female Pedestrian Severity: Slight Pedestrian Direction: SW

Polic TK803512 30/12/2012 Easting: 490,795Northing: 274,423 Sunday Time: 1149 Vehicles24 Casualties Severity: Fatal Road surface: Dry Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Daylight:street lights present Specia Road Type: Acc Desc: V1 N/B ON A6, V2 S/B. V1 OVERTAKES MULTIPLE CARS AND COLLIDES WITH V2

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 14 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Data Request Kettering et al. Junctions 3,2,12,13 and 16. 5 Years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: 2nd: 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on A6 400M N OF C4 HIGHAM RD BURTON RD

Vehicl 1 Car Overtaking moving vehicle on its offside Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o30 Breat Not requested Vehicle direction: S to N Driver Postcode: NN95LB FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:130 Age: Male Driver/rider Severity: Fatal

Casualty Reference:223 Age: Male Passenger Severity: Fatal

Vehicl 2 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o27 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: N to S Driver Postcode: DU58DT FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:327 Age: Female Driver/rider Severity: Serious

Casualty Reference:425 Age: Female Passenger Severity: Serious

Polic NK035013 16/02/2013 Easting: 490,785Northing: 274,032 Saturday Time: 1030 Vehicles2 Casualties 2 Severity: Slight Road surface: Dry Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Daylight:street lights present Specia Road Type: 5 Acc Desc: V1 TRAVELLING W TO S/E PULLS OUT OF JUNCTION AND COLLIDES WITH V2 TRAVELLING NORTH

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 15 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Data Request Kettering et al. Junctions 3,2,12,13 and 16. 5 Years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Disobeyed Give Way or Stop sign or markings Vehicle 1 Very Likely 2nd: Failed to look properly Vehicle 1 Very Likely 3rd: Failed to judge other persons path or speed Vehicle 1 Possible 4th: Dazzling sun Vehicle 1 Possible 5th: 6th:

Occurred on A6 AT THE JUNCTION WITH C4 HIGHAM ROAD, BURTON LATIMER

Vehicl 1 Car Turning right Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o67 Breat Not provide Vehicle direction: WSEto Driver Postcode: NN155NH FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:167 Age: Female Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Vehicl 2 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o65 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: SE to N Driver Postcode: NN173JJ FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:265 Age: Male Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Accidents involving: Casualties:

Fatal Serious Slight Total Fatal Serious Slight Total Motor 2204 14 Vehicle driver 2 21216 vehicles 2-wheeled 1 0 1 2 Passenger 1411 16 motor vehicles Pedal cycles 00 00Motorcycle rider 1 0 1 2

Horses & other 00 00Cyclist 000 0

Total 341522 Pedestrian 013 4

Other 000 0

Total 4727 38

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 16 TRAFFMAP SELECTION RESULTS Run on: 23/08/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Data Request Kettering et al. Junctions 3,2,12,13 and 16. 5 Years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013.

Police Ref.Date Cas. Sev. Cycs Peds Ch OAPs Vis. Manv. Road Cond. Time Location NK379709 12/09/2009 1 Slight 0 1 0 1 Light No turn Dry 1108 C4, HIGH STREET, BURTON LATIMER. 18M NE OF THE D2020, DUK TK194610 11/05/2010 2 Serious 0 0 0 0 Light No turn Dry 1930 A6, BURTON LATIMER. 800M S OF THE C139, CRANFORD ROAD. TK801310 08/07/2010 1Fatal 0 0 0 1 Light No turn Dry 1851 A6, BURTON LATIMER BYPASS, BURTON LATIMER. 600M N OF TH NK431910 27/10/2010 1 Slight 0 0 0 0 Light No turn Dry 1600 C4, KETTERING ROAD, BURTON LATIMER. AT THE RAB WITH TH NK515510 18/12/2010 1 Slight 0 0 0 0 Light No turn Wet/Damp 0823 A6, N/B, BURTON LATIMER. 227M NW OF THE C139, CRANFOR NK533010 25/12/2010 1 Slight 0 0 0 1 Dark No turn Frost/Ice 1730 A6, BURTON LATIMER. 300M S OF THE C139, CRANFORD ROAD. NK063411 09/02/2011 1 Slight 0 0 0 0 Dark Right Wet/Damp0709 C4, HIGHAM ROAD, BURTOM LATIMER. AT THE JCT WIT NK060211 11/02/2011 1 Slight 0 0 0 0 Light No turn Dry 0930 C139, CRANFORD ROAD, BURTON LATIMER. AT THE JCT WITH TH NK144511 25/04/2011 2 Slight 0 0 1 0 Light Right Dry 1420 A6, BURTON LATIMER. AT THE JCT WITH THE C139, CRANFOR NK147911 29/04/2011 6 Slight 0 0 0 1 Dark Right Dry 2020 A6, BURTON LATIMER. 581M E OF THE A14 JCT 10. NK214911 22/06/2011 1 Slight 0 0 0 0 Dark Right Wet/Damp 2319 U7400, CHURCHILL WAY, BURTON LATIMER. AT THE JCT WITH TH NK248911 21/07/2011 1 Serious 0 1 0 0 Dark No turn Dry 0108 A6, BURTON LATIMER. 900M N OF THE C4, HIGHAM ROAD. NK034912 07/02/2012 2 Slight 0 0 0 0 Light Right Wet/Damp0730 A6, BURTON LATIMER. 890M N OF THE C4, HIGHAM ROAD. NK069112 13/03/2012 1 Slight 0 1 0 0 Light No turn Dry 1720 C4, HIGH STREET, BURTON. 58M S OF U7402, PIGOTTS LANE. NKO80312 21/03/2012 1 Slight 0 0 0 1 Light No turn Dry 1700 C4 HIGH ST 10M S OF JCT WITH PIGGOTTS LANE nk087312 04/04/2012 1Slight 0 0 0 1 Light No turn Wet/Damp1351 A6 100M NORTH OF C4 HIGHAM RD NK137412 09/06/2012 4 Serious 0 0 0 0 Dark No turn Dry 2315 A6 ROUNDABOUT BURTON LATIMER WITH U139 CRANFORD ROAD TK801912 10/06/2012 1Fatal 0 0 0 0 Dark No turn Wet/Damp 2230 ROUNDABOUT OF A6 AND C139 CRANFORD RD NK173512 11/07/2012 2 Serious 0 0 0 0 Light No turn Wet/Damp 2048 A6, BURTON LATIMER. AT THE RAB WITH THE C139, CRANFOR NK286812 08/11/2012 1 Slight 0 1 1 0 Dark No turn Dry 2006 U7400 CHURCHILL WAY 72M NW OF C4 HIGH ST TK803512 30/12/2012 4Fatal 0 0 0 0 Light No turn Dry 1149 A6 400M N OF C4 HIGHAM RD BURTON RD NK035013 16/02/2013 2 Slight 0 0 0 2 Light Right Dry 1030 A6 AT THE JUNCTION WITH C4 HIGHAM ROAD, BURTON LATIMER

Column Totals 38 0 4 2 8 No. of Accidents 0427

Total number of accidents listed: 22

Registered to:NCC-MGWSP 1 TRAFFMAP SUMMARY REPORT Run on: 23/08/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Kettering et al. Junctions 17,18 and 1. 5 years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013.

Casualties Ftl Causation Ped Road Vehicle Police Ref. Acc Class Date Time Grid References Ser Slt Factors/ Prob L M D Light Weather Surface Types TW402608 Serious 20/06/2008 1315 492105 272218 0 1 0 405V1A 406V1A 0 0 0LightFine without high winds Dry 3 9 406V1A NW368108 4 06/08/2008 0315 492110 272209 0 0 0 0 0 0DarkFine without high winds Dry 9 NW385308 Slight 17/08/2008 1810 492132 272173 0 0 2 405V1A 406V1A 0 0 0LightFine without high winds Dry 9 5 NW387808 Slight 18/08/2008 1400 492130 272169 0 0 2 405V1A 406V1A 0 0 0LightFine without high winds Dry 9 9 TW424308 Slight 09/09/2008 1518 492100 272231 0 0 3 408V1A 102V1A 0 0 0LightRaining without high winds Wet/Damp 9 9 NW622008 Slight 17/12/2008 1710 488238 274362 0 0 1 104V1B 308V1B 0 0 0DarkFine without high winds Wet/Damp 9 9 408V1A TW468409 Slight 08/11/2009 1905 488194 274432 0 0 1 710V1A 0 0 0DarkFine without high winds Dry 14 9 NW504909 Slight 28/11/2009 1530 492153 272181 0 0 2 405V1A 406V1A 0 0 0LightRaining without high winds Wet/Damp 21 9 602V1A 306V1A 307V1A NW419310 Slight 15/10/2010 0658 488175 274466 0 0 1 407V1A 507V2A 0 0 0DarkFine without high winds Dry 21 1 NW413110 Slight 17/10/2010 1138 492148 272167 0 0 1 405V1A 406V1A 0 0 0LightFine without high winds Dry 9 5 NW446010 Slight 03/11/2010 1650 492146 272168 0 0 1 405V1A 0 0 0DarkFine without high winds Dry 9 5 NW448911 Slight 07/12/2011 0912 492187 272132 0 0 1 706V1A 308V1B 0 0 0LightFine without high winds Dry 9 9 408V2B NW033912 Slight 04/02/2012 2020 488672 272756 0 0 1 103V1A 410V1A 0 0 0DarkSnowing without high winds Snow 9 9 9 9 409V3A

Column Totals 01 0

Total number of accidents listed: 13

Registered to:NCC-MGWSP 1 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Kettering et al. Junctions 17,18 and 1. 5 years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013.

Polic TW402608 20/06/2008 Easting: 492,105Northing: 272,218 Friday Time: 1315 Vehicles21 Casualties Severity: Serious Road surface: Dry Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Daylight:street lights present Specia Road Type: Slip road Acc Desc: V1 WAS OVERTAKING A LINE OF STATIONARY TRAFFIC AT THE SAME TIME AS V2 STARTS TO TURN RIGHT . VS COLLIDED AND RIDER OF V1 FALLS FROM BIKE.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Failed to look properly Vehicle 1 Very Likely 2nd: Failed to judge other persons path or speed Vehicle 1 Very Likely 3rd: Failed to judge other persons path or speed Vehicle 1 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on A6, HIGH STREET, FINEDON. AT THE JCT WITH THE D6768, HIGH STREET.

Vehicl 1 Motorcycle over 50cc and up to 125cc Overtaking moving vehicle on its offside Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o 18 Breat Not provide Vehicle direction: NWSEto Driver Postcode: NN95QT FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:118 Age: Male Driver/rider Severity: Serious

Vehicl 2 Car Turning right Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o68 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: NWSWto Driver Postcode: NN157DR FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Polic NW368108 06/08/2008 Easting: 492,110 Northing: 272,209 Wednesday Time: 0315 Vehicles10 Casualties Severity: 4 Road surface: Dry Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Darkness: street lights present and lit Specia Road Type: Slip road Acc Desc: V1 TRAVELLING NW ALONG BURTON ROAD WHEN PED1 JUMPED ONTO V1S BONNET.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: 2nd: 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 1 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Kettering et al. Junctions 17,18 and 1. 5 years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013. Occurred on A6, BURTON ROAD, FINEDON. AT THE JCT WITH THE D6768, HIGH STREET.

Vehicl 1 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o 22 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: SE to NW Driver Postcode: NN169TL FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Commuting to/from work

Polic NW385308 17/08/2008 Easting: 492,132 Northing: 272,173 Sunday Time: 1810 Vehicles22 Casualties Severity: Slight Road surface: Dry Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Daylight:street lights present Specia Road Type: Dual carriageway Acc Desc: V1 PULLS OUT OF JCT AND INTO THE PATH OF V2 WHICH WAS ALREADY ON THE RAB. VS COLLIDE.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Failed to look properly Vehicle 1 Very Likely 2nd: Failed to judge other persons path or speed Vehicle 1 Very Likely 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on A510, WELLINGBOROUGH ROAD, FINEDON. AT THE JCT WITH THE A6, BURTON ROAD.

Vehicl 1 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Offside Age o21 Breat Not provide Vehicle direction: SW to NE Driver Postcode: NN95PZ FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:121 Age: Female Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Vehicl 2 Motorcycle over 500cc Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o42 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: SE to NW Driver Postcode: NN95TA FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:242 Age: Male Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Polic NW387808 18/08/2008 Easting: 492,130Northing: 272,169 Monday Time: 1400 Vehicles22 Casualties Severity: Slight Road surface: Dry Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Daylight:street lights present Specia Road Type: Dual carriageway Acc Desc: V1 FAILS TO STOP AND COLLIDES WITH THE REAR OF V2 WHICH WAS STATIONARY AT RAB.

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 2 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Kettering et al. Junctions 17,18 and 1. 5 years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Failed to look properly Vehicle 1 Very Likely 2nd: Failed to judge other persons path or speed Vehicle 1 Very Likely 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on A510, WELLINGBOROUGH ROAD, FINEDON, AT THE RAB WITH THE A6, BURTON ROAD.

Vehicl 1 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o29 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: SW to NE Driver Postcode: NN156DP FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known Vehicl 2 Car Waiting to go ahead but held up Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Back Age o55 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: SW to NE Driver Postcode: NN171OU FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:155 Age: Female Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Casualty Reference:276 Age: Female Passenger Severity: Slight

Polic TW424308 09/09/2008 Easting: 492,100Northing: 272,231 Tuesday Time: 1518 Vehicles23 Casualties Severity: Slight Road surface: Wet/Damp Weather: Raining without high winds Light: Daylight:street lights present Specia Road Type: Slip road Acc Desc: V1 HAS FAILED TO STOP IN TIME AND HAS SKIDDED INTO THE REAR OF V2 WHICH WAS STATIONARY IN TRAFFIC. EVIDENCE OF OIL/DIESEL ON ROAD.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Sudden braking Vehicle 1 Very Likely 2nd: Deposit on road (eg oil, mud, chippings) Vehicle 1 Very Likely 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on A6, BURTON ROAD, FINEDON. AT THE JCT WITH THE D6768, HIGH STREET.

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 3 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Kettering et al. Junctions 17,18 and 1. 5 years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013. Vehicl 1 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane Skidded First point of impact: Front Age o26 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: NWSEto Driver Postcode: PE261JW FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Journey as part of work Vehicl 2 Car Waiting to go ahead but held up Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Back Age o 56 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: NWSEto Driver Postcode: NN95LD FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Journey as part of work

Casualty Reference:161 Age: Male Passenger Severity: Slight

Casualty Reference:256 Age: Male Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Casualty Reference:313 Age: Male Passenger Severity: Slight

Polic NW622008 17/12/2008 Easting: 488,238 Northing: 274,362 Wednesday Time: 1710 Vehicles21 Casualties Severity: Slight Road surface: Wet/Damp Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Darkness: no street lighting Specia Road Type: 5 Acc Desc: V1 HAS FAILED TO STOP IN TIME AND HAS COLLIDED WITH THE REAR OF V2 WHICH WAS STATIONARY AT THE RAB.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Inadequate/Masked signs or road markings Vehicle 1 Possible 2nd: Following too close Vehicle 1 Possible 3rd: Sudden braking Vehicle 1 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on A509, KETTERING ROAD. ISHAM. AT THE JCT WITH THE C80, STATION ROAD.

Vehicl 1 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane Skidded First point of impact: Front Age o22 Breat Not requested Vehicle direction: NWSEto Driver Postcode: LE168RS FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Commuting to/from work Vehicl 2 Car Waiting to go ahead but held up Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Back Age o44 Breat Not requested Vehicle direction: NWSEto Driver Postcode: NN85XN FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Commuting to/from work

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 4 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Kettering et al. Junctions 17,18 and 1. 5 years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013. Casualty Reference:144 Age: Male Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Polic TW468409 08/11/2009 Easting: 488,194Northing: 274,432 Sunday Time: 1905 Vehicles21 Casualties Severity: Slight Road surface: Dry Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Darkness: no street lighting Specia Road Type: Acc Desc: V2 HAS BROKEN DOWN AT THE SIDE OF THE ROAD. POLICE V IS BEHIND IT GIVING COVER. V1 AMBULANCE ON ROUTE TO RTC BELIEVES THIS IS IT AND PULLS INFRONT OF V2. V1 THEN REVERSES AND COLLIDES WITH THE FRONT OF V2.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Vehicle blind spot Vehicle 1 Very Likely 2nd: 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on A509, KETTERING ROAD, ISHAM. 100M NW OF THE C80, STATION ROAD.

Vehicl 1 Other motor vehicle Reversing Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o36 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: SE to NW Driver Postcode: NN157NG FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Journey as part of work Vehicl 2 Car Parked Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o 19 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: Parto Parked Driver Postcode: NN95PX FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:119 Age: Male Passenger Severity: Slight

Polic NW504909 28/11/2009 Easting: 492,153Northing: 272,181 Saturday Time: 1530 Vehicles22 Casualties Severity: Slight Road surface: Wet/Damp Weather: Raining without high winds Light: Daylight:street lights present Specia Road Type: Dual carriageway Acc Desc: V1 HAS PULLED ONTO THE RAB AND INTO THE PATH OF V2 WHICH WAS TRAVELLING SE ALONG ITHLINGBOROUGH ROAD.

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 5 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Kettering et al. Junctions 17,18 and 1. 5 years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Failed to look properly Vehicle 1 Very Likely 2nd: Failed to judge other persons path or speed Vehicle 1 Very Likely 3rd: Careless/Reckless/In a hurry Vehicle 1 Very Likely 4th: Exceeding speed limit Vehicle 1 Very Likely 5th: Travelling too fast for conditions Vehicle 1 Very Likely 6th:

Occurred on A6, IRTHLINGBOROUGH ROAD, FINEDON. AT THE RAB WITH THE A510, THRAPSTON ROAD.

Vehicl 1 Goods >= 7.5 tonnes mgw Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o57 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: NESWto Driver Postcode: CB74TA FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known Vehicl 2 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o55 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: NWSEto Driver Postcode: NN96DB FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:155 Age: Female Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Casualty Reference:226 Age: Female Passenger Severity: Slight

Polic NW419310 15/10/2010 Easting: 488,175Northing: 274,466 Friday Time: 0658 Vehicles21 Casualties Severity: Slight Road surface: Dry Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Darkness: no street lighting Specia Road Type: Acc Desc: V1 MOVES OVER TO THE N/S TO ALLOW A WIDE LOAD TRAVELLING IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION TO PASS . V1 COLLIDES WITH V2.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Passing too close to cyclist, horse rider or pedestrian Vehicle 1 Very Likely 2nd: Cyclist wearing dark clothing at night Vehicle 2 Very Likely 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on A509, KETTERING ROAD, ISHAM. 130M NW OF THE C80, STATION ROAD.

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 6 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Kettering et al. Junctions 17,18 and 1. 5 years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013. Vehicl 1 Goods >= 7.5 tonnes mgw Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Nearside Age o55 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: NWSEto Driver Postcode: NN38QQ FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Journey as part of work Vehicl 2 Pedal cycle Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Offside Age o 31 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: NWSEto Driver Postcode: NN156JB FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Commuting to/from work

Casualty Reference:131 Age: Male Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Polic NW413110 17/10/2010 Easting: 492,148Northing: 272,167 Sunday Time: 1138 Vehicles21 CasualtiesSeverity: Slight Road surface: Dry Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Daylight:street lights present Specia Road Type: Dual carriageway Acc Desc: V1 FAILS TO GIVE WAY AND PULLS OUT ONTO THE RAB AND INTO THE PATH OF V2 WHICH WAS ALREADY ON THE RAB.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Failed to look properly Vehicle 1 Very Likely 2nd: Failed to judge other persons path or speed Vehicle 1 Very Likely 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on A6, IRTHLINGBOROUGH ROAD, FINEDON. AT THE RAB WITH THE A510, WELLINGBOROUG

Vehicl 1 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o45 Breat Not requested Vehicle direction: SE to NW Driver Postcode: NN FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known Vehicl 2 Motorcycle over 500cc Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Nearside Age o51 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: NESWto Driver Postcode: NN155BZ FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:151 Age: Male Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 7 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Kettering et al. Junctions 17,18 and 1. 5 years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013.

Polic NW446010 03/11/2010 Easting: 492,146Northing: 272,168 Wednesday Time: 1650 Vehicles21 Casualties Severity: Slight Road surface: Dry Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Darkness: street lights present and lit Specia Road Type: Dual carriageway Acc Desc: V1 HAS PULLED OUT ONTO THE RAB AND INTO THE PATH OF V2 WHICH WAS ALREADY TRAVELLING AROUND THE RAB.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Failed to look properly Vehicle 1 Very Likely 2nd: 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on A6, IRTHLINGBOROUGH ROAD, FINEDON. AT THE RAB WITH THE A510, WELLINGBOROUG

Vehicl 1 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o 77 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: SE to NW Driver Postcode: NN FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known Vehicl 2 Motorcycle over 500cc Turning right Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Nearside Age o29 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: NWSWto Driver Postcode: NN100LS FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:129 Age: Male Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Polic NW448911 07/12/2011 Easting: 492,187 Northing: 272,132 Wednesday Time: 0912 Vehicles21 Casualties Severity: Slight Road surface: Dry Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Daylight:street lights present Specia Road Type: Acc Desc: DRIVER OF V1 IS DAZZLED BY THE SUN AND FAILS TO STOP IN TIME COLLIDING WITH THE REAR OF V2 WHICH WAS STATIONARY AT TRAFFIC SIGNALS.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Dazzling sun Vehicle 1 Very Likely 2nd: Following too close Vehicle 1 Possible 3rd: Sudden braking Vehicle 2 4th: 5th: 6th:

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 8 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Kettering et al. Junctions 17,18 and 1. 5 years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013. Occurred on A6, IRTHLINGBOROUGH ROAD, FINEDON. 50M SE OF THE A510, WELLINGBOROUGH ROAD.

Vehicl 1 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o 29 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: NWSEto Driver Postcode: NN24NV FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Journey as part of work Vehicl 2 Car Waiting to go ahead but held up Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Back Age o52 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: NWSEto Driver Postcode: NN155YF FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:152 Age: Female Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Polic NW033912 04/02/2012 Easting: 488,672Northing: 272,756 Saturday Time: 2020 Vehicles41 Casualties Severity: Slight Road surface: Snow Weather: Snowing without high winds Light: Darkness: no street lighting Specia Road Type: 5 Acc Desc: V1 TRAVELLING N ON A509 KETTERING ROAD, LOSES CONTROL ON SLIGHT LEFT HAND BEND AND COMES TO REST ACCROS THE CARRIAGEWAY, BLOCKING N/B SIDE. V2 ALSO TRAVELLING N ON KETTERING ROAD , COLLIDES WITH THE NEARSIDE REAR OF V1 SPINNING V1 180, AND COMES TO RE

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Slippery road (due to weather) Vehicle 1 Very Likely 2nd: Loss of control Vehicle 1 Very Likely 3rd: Swerved Vehicle 3 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on A509 KETTERING ROAD AT THE JUNCTION WITH C4 FINEDON STATION ROAD, ISHAM

Vehicl 1 Car Going ahead left hand bend Not in restricted lane Skidded First point of impact: Offside Age o44 Breat Not requested Vehicle direction: S to NW Driver Postcode: NN156XJ FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Commuting to/from work Vehicl 2 Car Going ahead left hand bend Not in restricted lane Skidded First point of impact: Front Age o38 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: S to NW Driver Postcode: NN82HU FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Commuting to/from work

Casualty Reference:138 Age: Female Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 9 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Kettering et al. Junctions 17,18 and 1. 5 years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013. Vehicl 3 Car Going ahead left hand bend Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Did not impact Age o46 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: S to NW Driver Postcode: NN168UA FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known Vehicl 4 Car Going ahead left hand bend Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o 53 Breat Not requested Vehicle direction: S to NW Driver Postcode: NN160JL FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Accidents involving: Casualties:

Fatal Serious Slight Total Fatal Serious Slight Total Motor 080 7 Vehicle driver 0 07 7 vehicles 2-wheeled 0 1 3 4 Passenger 0055 motor vehicles Pedal cycles 00 11Motorcycle rider 0 1 3 4

Horses & other 00 00Cyclist 0 0 11

Total 011113 Pedestrian 0 0 00

Other 000 0

Total 0116 17

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 10 TRAFFMAP SELECTION RESULTS Run on: 23/08/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Kettering et al. Junctions 17,18 and 1. 5 years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013.

Police Ref.Date Cas. Sev. Cycs Peds Ch OAPs Vis. Manv. Road Cond. Time Location TW402608 20/06/2008 1 Serious 0 0 0 0 Light Right Dry 1315 A6, HIGH STREET, FINEDON. AT THE JCT WITH THE D6768, HIG NW368108 06/08/2008 0 4 0 0 0 0 Dark No turn Dry 0315 A6, BURTON ROAD, FINEDON. AT THE JCT WITH THE D6768, HIG NW385308 17/08/2008 2 Slight 0 0 0 0 Light No turn Dry 1810 A510, WELLINGBOROUGH ROAD, FINEDON. AT THE JCT WITH TH NW387808 18/08/2008 2 Slight 0 0 0 1 Light No turn Dry 1400 A510, WELLINGBOROUGH ROAD, FINEDON, AT THE RAB WITH TH TW424308 09/09/2008 3Slight 0 0 1 1 Light No turn Wet/Damp 1518 A6, BURTON ROAD, FINEDON. AT THE JCT WITH THE D6768, HIG NW622008 17/12/2008 1 Slight 0 0 0 0 Dark No turn Wet/Damp 1710 A509, KETTERING ROAD. ISHAM. AT THE JCT WITH THE C80 TW468409 08/11/2009 1Slight 0 0 0 0 Dark No turn Dry 1905 A509, KETTERING ROAD, ISHAM. 100M NW OF THE C80, STATIO NW504909 28/11/2009 2 Slight 0 0 0 0 Light No turn Wet/Damp 1530 A6, IRTHLINGBOROUGH ROAD, FINEDON. AT THE RAB WITH TH NW419310 15/10/2010 1 Slight 1 0 0 0 Dark No turn Dry 0658 A509, KETTERING ROAD, ISHAM. 130M NW OF THE C80, STATIO NW413110 17/10/2010 1 Slight 0 0 0 0 Light No turn Dry 1138 A6, IRTHLINGBOROUGH ROAD, FINEDON. AT THE RAB WITH TH NW446010 03/11/2010 1 Slight 0 0 0 0 Dark Right Dry 1650 A6, IRTHLINGBOROUGH ROAD, FINEDON. AT THE RAB WITH TH NW448911 07/12/2011 1 Slight 0 0 0 0 Light No turn Dry 0912 A6, IRTHLINGBOROUGH ROAD, FINEDON. 50M SE OF THE A510 NW033912 04/02/2012 1 Slight 0 0 0 0 Dark No turn Snow 2020 A509 KETTERING ROAD AT THE JUNCTION WITH C4 FINEDO

Column Totals 17 1 0 1 2 No. of Accidents 1012

Total number of accidents listed: 13

Registered to:NCC-MGWSP 1

TRAFFMAP SUMMARY REPORT Run on: 23/08/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Kettering et al - Junction 23 - 24 - 25. 5 years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013.

Casualties Ftl Causation Ped Road Vehicle Police Ref. Acc Class Date Time Grid References Ser Slt Factors/ Prob L M D Light Weather Surface Types NK462908 Serious 04/10/2008 1415 487025 278012 0 1 0 405V1A 403V1A 0 0 0LightFine without high winds Dry 9 2 403V2A NK056409 Slight 31/01/2009 0230 486884 278282 0 0 1 605V1A 0 0 0DarkFine without high winds Dry 9 8 NK119610 Slight 21/03/2010 1155 486981 278081 0 0 1 802C1A 808C1A 4 1 6LightFine without high winds Dry 9 NK175510 Slight 01/05/2010 1755 486976 278087 0 0 1 605V1B 607V1B 0 0 0LightFine without high winds Dry 2 9 NK194310 Slight 14/05/2010 1800 486915 278225 0 0 1 807C1A 803C1A 5 1 8LightFine without high winds Dry 19 406V1B NK327910 Slight 10/08/2010 0638 486904 278230 0 0 1 408V1A 0 0 0LightRaining without high winds Wet/Damp 3 NK326010 Slight 11/08/2010 1310 487318 277720 0 0 1 408V1B 508V1B 0 0 0LightFine without high winds Dry 9 9 NK065311 Slight 16/02/2011 1720 487266 277774 0 0 1 308V1B 0 0 0DarkFine without high winds Wet/Damp 9 9 NK409411 Slight 23/11/2011 1640 487133 277880 0 0 3 405V1A 0 0 0DarkFine without high winds Dry 9 9 9 NK437711 Slight 11/12/2011 0100 486884 278280 0 0 1 405V1A 301V1A 0 0 0DarkFine without high winds Dry 9 9 NK013512 Serious 10/01/2012 0800 486885 278280 0 1 0 105V1B 301V1B 0 0 0LightFine without high winds Dry 9 9 NK042312 Slight 15/02/2012 1010 487184 277836 0 0 3 405V1A 406V1A 0 0 0LightFine without high winds Wet/Damp 9 9 201V1B NK180112 Slight 18/07/2012 1255 486877 278274 0 0 1 0 0 0LightFine without high winds Wet/Damp 9 9

Column Totals 02 0

Total number of accidents listed: 13

Registered to:NCC-MGWSP 1 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Kettering et al - Junction 23 - 24 - 25. 5 years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013.

Polic NK462908 04/10/2008 Easting: 487,025Northing: 278,012 Saturday Time: 1415 Vehicles21 Casualties Severity: Serious Road surface: Dry Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Daylight:street lights present Specia Road Type: 5 Acc Desc: V1 AND V2 WERE TRAVELLING S ALONG LONDON ROAD. V1 INDICATES TO TURN RIGHT. V2 STARTS TO UNDERTAKE V1 BUT V1 CHANGES MIND AND TURNS BACK INTO THE PATH OF V2.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Failed to look properly Vehicle 1 Very Likely 2nd: Poor turn or manoevre Vehicle 1 Very Likely 3rd: Poor turn or manoevre Vehicle 2 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on A6003, LONDON ROAD, KETTERING. AT THE JCT WITH THE C137, BROADWAY.

Vehicl 1 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o 32 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: NWSEto Driver Postcode: NN26PT FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known Vehicl 2 Motorcycle 50cc and under Overtaking on nearside Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Offside Age o16 Breat Not provide Vehicle direction: NWSEto Driver Postcode: NN156FU FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:116 Age: Male Driver/rider Severity: Serious School pupil to or from school 382

Polic NK056409 31/01/2009 Easting: 486,884 Northing: 278,282 Saturday Time: 0230 Vehicles21 Casualties Severity: Slight Road surface: Dry Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Darkness: street lights present and lit Specia Road Type: Dual carriageway Acc Desc: V1 TURNS RIGHT INTO BOWLING GREEN ROAD INTO THE PATH OF V2 WHICH WAS TRAVELLING NW ALONG LONDON ROAD. BOTH SETS OF LIGHTS WERE ON GREEN BUT V1 DID NOT HAVE GREEN FOR TURNING RIGHT.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Inexperienced or learner driver/rider Vehicle 1 Very Likely 2nd: 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 1 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Kettering et al - Junction 23 - 24 - 25. 5 years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013. Occurred on A6900, LONDON ROAD, KETTERING. AT THE JCT WITH THE A6003, BOWLING GREEN ROAD.

Vehicl 1 Car Turning right Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o 18 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: NWSWto Driver Postcode: NN96TG FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:118 Age: Male Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Vehicl 2 Taxi Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o Breat Negative Vehicle direction: SE to NW Driver Postcode: Unknown FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Journey as part of work

Polic NK119610 21/03/2010 Easting: 486,981Northing: 278,081 Sunday Time: 1155 Vehicles11 Casualties Severity: Slight Road surface: Dry Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Daylight:street lights present Specia Road Type: Single carriageway Acc Desc: PED1 HAS RAN INTO THE PATH OF V1 FROM THE PAVEMENT. V1 WAS TRAVELLING SE ALONG LONDON ROAD.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Failed to look properly Casualty 1 Very Likely 2nd: Careless/Reckless/In a hurry Casualty 1 Very Likely 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on A6003, LONDON ROAD, KETTERING. AT THE ENTRANCE TO ST MARYS HOSPITAL.

Vehicl 1 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o 42 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: NWSEto Driver Postcode: NN168 FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:112 Age: Male Pedestrian Severity: Slight Pedestrian Direction: SW

Polic NK175510 01/05/2010 Easting: 486,976Northing: 278,087 Saturday Time: 1755 Vehicles21 CasualtiesSeverity: Slight Road surface: Dry Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Daylight:street lights present Specia Road Type: Single carriageway Acc Desc: V1 FAILS TO STOP IN TIME AND COLLIDES WITH THE REAR OF V2 WHICH WAS STATIONARY IN A LINE OF TRAFFIC.

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 2 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Kettering et al - Junction 23 - 24 - 25. 5 years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Inexperienced or learner driver/rider Vehicle 1 Possible 2nd: Inexperience with type of vehicle Vehicle 1 Possible 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on A6003, LONDON ROAD, KETTERING. AT THE ENTRANCE TO ST MARYS HOSPITAL.

Vehicl 1 Motorcycle 50cc and under Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o16 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: NWSEto Driver Postcode: NN160HP FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:116 Age: Male Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Vehicl 2 Car Waiting to go ahead but held up Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Back Age o44 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: NWSEto Driver Postcode: LE169UL FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Polic NK194310 14/05/2010 Easting: 486,915Northing: 278,225 Friday Time: 1800 Vehicles11 Casualties Severity: Slight Road surface: Dry Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Daylight:street lights present Specia Road Type: Dual carriageway Acc Desc: V1 TURNS LEFT INTO ST MARYS ROAD AND COLLIDES WITH INTOXICATED PED1 WHO WAS CROSSING THE ROAD.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Impaired by drugs (illicit or medicinal) Casualty 1 Very Likely 2nd: Failed to judge vehicles path or speed Casualty 1 Very Likely 3rd: Failed to judge other persons path or speed Vehicle 1 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on A6900, ST MARYS ROAD, KETTERING. AT THE JCT WITH THE A6003, LONDON ROAD.

Vehicl 1 Goods <= 3.5 tonnes mgw Turning left Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Nearside Age o Breat Not requested Vehicle direction: NW to NE Driver Postcode: Unknown FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 3 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Kettering et al - Junction 23 - 24 - 25. 5 years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013. Casualty Reference:142 Age: Male Pedestrian Severity: Slight Pedestrian Direction: NW

Polic NK327910 10/08/2010 Easting: 486,904 Northing: 278,230 Tuesday Time: 0638 Vehicles11 Casualties Severity: Slight Road surface: Wet/Damp Weather: Raining without high winds Light: Daylight:street lights present Specia Road Type: Dual carriageway Acc Desc: RIDER OF V1 HAS TO BRAKE HARD DUE TO TRAFFIC SIGNALS CHANGING TO RED. THIS CAUSES RIDER TO LOSE CONTROL AND FALL TO THE FALL.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Sudden braking Vehicle 1 Very Likely 2nd: 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on A6003, LONDON ROAD, KETTERING. AT THE JCT WITH THE A6900, ST MARYS ROAD.

Vehicl 1 Motorcycle over 50cc and up to 125cc Slowing or Stopping Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Offside Age o 21 Breat Not provide Vehicle direction: NWSEto Driver Postcode: NN168QH FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Commuting to/from work

Casualty Reference:121 Age: Female Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Polic NK326010 11/08/2010 Easting: 487,318Northing: 277,720 Wednesday Time: 1310 Vehicles21 CasualtiesSeverity: Slight Road surface: Dry Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Daylight:street lights present Specia Road Type: Single carriageway Acc Desc: V1 FAILS TO STOP IN TIME AND COLLIDES WITH V2 WHICH WAS STATIONARY WAITING FOR VEHICLES AHEAD TO TURN.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Sudden braking Vehicle 1 Possible 2nd: Driver using mobile phone Vehicle 1 Possible 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on A6003, LONDON ROAD, KETTERING. AT THE JCT WITH THE U7084, WALLIS ROAD.

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 4 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Kettering et al - Junction 23 - 24 - 25. 5 years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013. Vehicl 1 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o Breat Not requested Vehicle direction: NWSEto Driver Postcode: Unknown FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known Vehicl 2 Car Waiting to go ahead but held up Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Back Age o 41 Breat Not requested Vehicle direction: NWSEto Driver Postcode: NN156LG FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Taking pupil to/from school

Casualty Reference:141 Age: Female Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Polic NK065311 16/02/2011 Easting: 487,266Northing: 277,774 Wednesday Time: 1720 Vehicles21 CasualtiesSeverity: Slight Road surface: Wet/Damp Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Darkness: street lights present and lit Specia Road Type: 5 Acc Desc: V1 FAILS TO STOP IN TIME AND COLLIDES WITH THE REAR OF V2 WHICH WAS STATIONARY IN A LINE OF TRAFFIC.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Following too close Vehicle 1 Possible 2nd: 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on A6003, LONDON ROAD, KETTERING. AT THE JCT WITH THE C7034, HILLSIDE AVENUE.

Vehicl 1 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o Breat Not requested Vehicle direction: NWSEto Driver Postcode: NN37TY FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Commuting to/from work Vehicl 2 Car Waiting to go ahead but held up Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Back Age o 68 Breat Not requested Vehicle direction: NWSEto Driver Postcode: NN108EW FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:168 Age: Female Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 5 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Kettering et al - Junction 23 - 24 - 25. 5 years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013.

Polic NK409411 23/11/2011 Easting: 487,133Northing: 277,880 Wednesday Time: 1640 Vehicles33 Casualties Severity: Slight Road surface: Dry Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Darkness: street lights present and lit Specia Road Type: Single carriageway Acc Desc: V1 FAILS TO STOP IN TIME AND COLLIDES WITH THE REAR OF V2 WHICH WAS STATIONARY IN A LINE OF TRAFFIC. V2 IS THEN PUSHED INTO THE REAR OF V3.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Failed to look properly Vehicle 1 Very Likely 2nd: 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on A6003, LONDON ROAD, KETTERING. AT THE JCT WITH THE U7058, PIPERS HILL ROAD.

Vehicl 1 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o 29 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: SE to NW Driver Postcode: NN160RL FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known Vehicl 2 Car Waiting to go ahead but held up Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Back Age o29 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: SE to NW Driver Postcode: NN188QP FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Commuting to/from work

Casualty Reference:129 Age: Male Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Vehicl 3 Car Waiting to go ahead but held up Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Back Age o29 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: SE to NW Driver Postcode: NN FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Journey as part of work

Casualty Reference:230 Age: Female Passenger Severity: Slight

Casualty Reference:329 Age: Female Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Polic NK437711 11/12/2011 Easting: 486,884Northing: 278,280 Sunday Time: 0100 Vehicles21 Casualties Severity: Slight Road surface: Dry Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Darkness: street lights present but unlit Specia Road Type: Dual carriageway Acc Desc: V1 TURNS RIGHT INTO BOWLING GREEN ROAD AND INTO THE PATH OF V2 WHICH WAS TRAVELLING N ALONG LONDON ROAD.

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 6 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Kettering et al - Junction 23 - 24 - 25. 5 years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Failed to look properly Vehicle 1 Very Likely 2nd: Disobeyed automatic traffic signal Vehicle 1 Very Likely 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on A6003, LONDON ROAD, KETTERING. AT THE JCT WITH THE A6003, BOWLING GREEN ROAD.

Vehicl 1 Car Turning right Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o Breat Negative Vehicle direction: N to SW Driver Postcode: Unknown FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known Vehicl 2 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o23 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: SE to NW Driver Postcode: NN144NR FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:121 Age: Female Passenger Severity: Slight

Polic NK013512 10/01/2012 Easting: 486,885Northing: 278,280 Tuesday Time: 0800 Vehicles21 Casualties Severity: Serious Road surface: Dry Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Daylight:street lights present Specia Road Type: Dual carriageway Acc Desc: V1 TURNS RIGHT INTO BOWLING GREEN ROAD AND INTO THE PATH OF V2 WHICH WAS TRAVELLING N ALONG LONDON ROAD. DRIVER OF V1 HAS TURNED RIGHT ON A RED TRAFFIC SIGNAL.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Defective traffic signals Vehicle 1 Possible 2nd: Disobeyed automatic traffic signal Vehicle 1 Possible 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on A6003, LONDON ROAD, KETTERING. AT THE JCT WITH THE A6003, BOWLING GREEN ROAD.

Vehicl 1 Car Turning right Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o 30 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: NWSWto Driver Postcode: NN160TE FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Journey as part of work

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 7 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Kettering et al - Junction 23 - 24 - 25. 5 years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013. Casualty Reference:130 Age: Female Driver/rider Severity: Serious

Vehicl 2 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o26 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: SE to NW Driver Postcode: NN156RW FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Commuting to/from work

Polic NK042312 15/02/2012 Easting: 487,184Northing: 277,836 Wednesday Time: 1010 Vehicles23 Casualties Severity: Slight Road surface: Wet/Damp Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Daylight: no street lighting Specia Road Type: Single carriageway Acc Desc: V2 SE ON LONDON ROAD, COMES TO A STOP OPPOSITE ROUNDHILL ROAD WAITING TO TURN RIGHT. V1 ALSO SE ON LONDON ROAD, DOES NOT SLOW AND COLLIDES WITH THE REAR OF V2.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Failed to look properly Vehicle 1 Very Likely 2nd: Failed to judge other persons path or speed Vehicle 1 Very Likely 3rd: Tyres illegal, defective or under inflated Vehicle 1 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on A6003 LONDON ROAD AT THE JUNCTION WITH U7064 ROUNDHILL ROAD, KETTERING

Vehicl 1 Car Going ahead Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Back Age o33 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: NWSEto Driver Postcode: NN157RP FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known Vehicl 2 Car Waiting to turn right Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Did not impact Age o29 Breat Not provide Vehicle direction: NWSEto Driver Postcode: NN160LU FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:129 Age: Female Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Casualty Reference:210 Age: Female Passenger Severity: Slight

Casualty Reference:312 Age: Female Passenger Severity: Slight

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 8 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Kettering et al - Junction 23 - 24 - 25. 5 years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013.

Polic NK180112 18/07/2012 Easting: 486,877Northing: 278,274 Wednesday Time: 1255 Vehicles21 Casualties Severity: Slight Road surface: Wet/Damp Weather: Fine without high winds Light: Daylight:street lights present Specia Road Type: Dual carriageway Acc Desc: V2 TURNS RIGHT INTO BOWLING GREEN ROAD FROM LONDON ROAD ON A GREEN SIGNAL. V1 TURNS LEFT INTO LONDON ROAD ON A GREEN SIGNAL. V2 EXPECTS V1 TO GIVE WAY BUT IT DOESNT, AND V2 COLLIDES WITH THE OFFSIDE OF V1 AS IT PULLS OUT IN FRONT. V1 DOES NOT STOP.

Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: 2nd: 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:

Occurred on A6003 BOWLING GREEN ROAD AT THE JUNCTION WITH A6003 LONDON ROAD, KETTERING

Vehicl 1 Car Turning left Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Offside Age o 66 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: SWto Driver Postcode: NN157ES FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known Vehicl 2 Car Turning right Not in restricted lane No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning First point of impact: Front Age o64 Breat Negative Vehicle direction: N to W Driver Postcode: NN156BT FRV Not foreign registered vehicle Journey: Other/Not known

Casualty Reference:164 Age: Male Driver/rider Severity: Slight

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 9 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 08/ 23/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Kettering et al - Junction 23 - 24 - 25. 5 years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013.

Accidents involving: Casualties:

Fatal Serious Slight Total Fatal Serious Slight Total Motor 0101 9 Vehicle driver 017 8 vehicles 2-wheeled 0 1 2 3 Passenger 004 4 motor vehicles Pedal cycles 00 00Motorcycle rider 0 1 2 3

Horses & other 00 00Cyclist 0 00 0

Total 021113 Pedestrian 0 02 2

Other 000 0

Total 0215 17

Registered to: NCC-MGWSP 10 TRAFFMAP SELECTION RESULTS Run on: 23/08/2013 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System

Accidents between dates 01/06/2008 and 31/05/2013 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Kettering et al - Junction 23 - 24 - 25. 5 years collision data up to and including the 31st May 2013.

Police Ref.Date Cas. Sev. Cycs Peds Ch OAPs Vis. Manv. Road Cond. Time Location NK462908 04/10/2008 1 Serious 0 0 0 0 Light No turn Dry 1415 A6003, LONDON ROAD, KETTERING. AT THE JCT WITH THE C137 NK056409 31/01/2009 1 Slight 0 0 0 0 Dark Right Dry 0230 A6900, LONDON ROAD, KETTERING. AT THE JCT WITH THE A6003 NK119610 21/03/2010 1 Slight 0 1 1 0 Light No turn Dry 1155 A6003, LONDON ROAD, KETTERING. AT THE ENTRANCE TO S NK175510 01/05/2010 1 Slight 0 0 0 0 Light No turn Dry 1755 A6003, LONDON ROAD, KETTERING. AT THE ENTRANCE TO S NK194310 14/05/2010 1 Slight 0 1 0 0 Light Left Dry 1800 A6900, ST MARYS ROAD, KETTERING. AT THE JCT WITH THE A600 NK327910 10/08/2010 1 Slight 0 0 0 0 Light No turn Wet/Damp 0638 A6003, LONDON ROAD, KETTERING. AT THE JCT WITH THE A6900 NK326010 11/08/2010 1 Slight 0 0 0 0 Light No turn Dry 1310 A6003, LONDON ROAD, KETTERING. AT THE JCT WITH THE U7084 NK065311 16/02/2011 1 Slight 0 0 0 1 Dark No turn Wet/Damp 1720 A6003, LONDON ROAD, KETTERING. AT THE JCT WITH THE C7034 NK409411 23/11/2011 3 Slight 0 0 0 0 Dark No turn Dry 1640 A6003, LONDON ROAD, KETTERING. AT THE JCT WITH THE U7058 NK437711 11/12/2011 1 Slight 0 0 0 0 Dark Right Dry 0100 A6003, LONDON ROAD, KETTERING. AT THE JCT WITH THE A6003 NK013512 10/01/2012 1 Serious 0 0 0 0 Light Right Dry 0800 A6003, LONDON ROAD, KETTERING. AT THE JCT WITH THE A6003 NK042312 15/02/2012 3 Slight 0 0 2 0 Light Right Wet/Damp 1010 A6003 LONDON ROAD AT THE JUNCTION WITH U7064 ROUNDHIL NK180112 18/07/2012 1 Slight 0 0 0 1 Light Both Wet/Damp1255 A6003 BOWLING GREEN ROAD AT THE JUNCTION WITH A600

Column Totals 17 0 2 3 2 No. of Accidents 0222

Total number of accidents listed: 13

Registered to:NCC-MGWSP 1