Pytchley Parish Council

Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan

2018 – 2031 Pre-Submission Version

Feb 2020 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

Foreword

The attached Neighbourhood Plan is an important document that affects all members of the community of Pytchley. It provides the village with a document that outlines the requirements for future development within the village during the next 30 years with regard to planning and land use.

The development of a Neighbourhood Plan by local communities became possible with the introduction of The Localism Act 2011, which gives new rights and powers to communities and individuals. It specifically allows local communities to develop and adopt Neighbourhood Plans, which will become a statutory part of the development plan.

In 2016, the Pytchley Parish Council committed to setting up a working group - the Pytchley Neighbourhood Plan Working Group - to develop the plan in accordance with the legal requirements and with the consultation of the local community. Alan Lodge was appointed the working group leader and four members volunteered to assist him, three members from the Parish Council and one member co-opted from the community. The working group remit was to produce a written plan ensuring that all the legislative procedures are adhered to and that the wishes of the community are taken into consideration. The Parish Council would be fully informed and would approve all stages of the plans development.

So, what is a Neighbourhood Plan? As stated before, it is a document that defines any issues dealing with ‘Land Development’. In other words, it will only address issues that would normally be passed to the Local Council Planning Department. Included would be: building development, extensions, change of use, protection of Listed Buildings, ensuring the conservation area is not compromised etc. It does not address directly issues such as speeding through the village, vehicle parking, etc unless these issues are part of planning issues. The ultimate result of the Plan is to define a set of ‘Planning Policies’. These policies will be form part of the criteria when reviewing any local planning applications.

Many of you may remember the questionnaire that was given to every member of the village in 2003, and subsequently updated in 2012, in order to produce a ‘Parish Plan’. The work that was put in to producing the plan and its subsequent update resulted in a very comprehensive picture of the village and its infrastructure. We have been fortunate in so much as we were able to use many of the findings from these two documents as a basis for going forward in the production of the Neighbourhood Plan.

Since then, the Working Group organised an ‘Open Day’ on Saturday 14th May 2016 to introduce the concept of the Neighbourhood Plan and to provide the village with an opportunity to be updated with developments. It was also an opportunity to provide an open platform for consultation. And as such, this Open Day was a great success with more than 60 members of the community attending. There was great interest shown and some excellent feed-back was received, for which the working group is very grateful. A great vote of thanks to all those who not only provided feedback on the day, but also to all those who diligently completed the earlier questionnaires.

On the following pages you will find a report that, in terms of land planning, incorporates your thoughts and wishes, and a series of planning policies relevant for

Page 2 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission the next 13 years of the village development. This report is at the pre-submission stage, indicating that it is ready for official examination by Kettering Borough Council.

The Parish Council and the Working Group hope that you find this document of interest. Please read through the various sections and if you have any queries/comments (positive or negative) please direct them to Alan Lodge or any member of the Parish Council or any member of the Working Group. You may also use the email address: https://www.pytchleyparishcouncil.org.uk

Signed on behalf of the Pytchley Parish Council

Alan Lodge (WG leader)

Julie Jelley, Richard Elias, Pat Hobson, Steve Booker (WG members)

Page 3 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

Contents

1. INTRODUCTION ...... 6 1.1. WHAT IS A NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN? ...... 6 1.1.1. Why does Pytchley need a Neighbourhood Plan ...... 7 1.2...... 9 1.3. PLAN OF DESIGNATED NEIGHBOURHOOD AREA...... 10 1.4. LOCAL PLANNING AUTHORITY ...... 10 1.5. ROUTE MAP ...... 11 2. THE NEIGHBOURHOOD AREA ...... 13 2.1. PYTCHLEY VILLAGE - A BRIEF DESCRIPTION...... 13 2.2. FACILITIES ...... 15 2.3. HOUSING ...... 16 2.4. EMPLOYMENT ...... 16 2.5. RENEWABLE ENERGY ...... 16 2.6. COMMUNICATIONS ...... 17 2.6.1. Road system ...... 17 2.6.2. Footpaths ...... 17 2.6.3. Broadband Internet ...... 19 2.6.4. Mobile Phone Reception ...... 19 3. KEY ISSUES ...... 20 3.1. BACKGROUND ...... 20 3.2. MAIN PLANNING ISSUES ...... 20 3.2.1. Housing ...... 20 3.2.2. Commercial Development ...... 21 3.2.3. Gypsy/Traveller Accommodation ...... 21 3.2.4. Sustainability ...... 21 3.2.5. Renewable Energy ...... 21 3.2.6. Facilities ...... 22 3.3. NON-PLANNING COMMUNITY ASPIRATIONS ...... 22 3.3.1. Roadways ...... 22 3.3.2. Parking ...... 22 3.3.3. Litter ...... 23 3.3.4. Dog mess ...... 23 3.3.5. Playground Equipment ...... 23 4. VISION AND OBJECTIVES ...... 24 4.1. VISION ...... 24 4.2. VILLAGE CATEGORY ...... 24 4.3. OBJECTIVES ...... 26 5. THE PLANNING POLICIES ...... 27 5.1. EXTRACT OF PREVIOUS REPORTS ...... 27 5.2. POLICY LOCATION MAP ...... 36 5.3. POLICY: PP01 PYTCHLEY SETTLEMENT BOUNDARY ...... 41 5.3.1. Policy PP01 ...... 41 POLICY: PP02 HOUSING SITE ALLOCATION ...... 42 5.3.2. Policy PP02 ...... 43 5.4. POLICY: PP03 COMMERCIAL LAND AND BUILDINGS WITHIN THE SETTLEMENT BOUNDARY ...... 45

Page 4 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

5.4.1. Policy PP03 ...... 45 5.5. POLICY: PP04 COMMERCIAL LAND AND BUILDINGS THROUGHOUT THE PARISH ... 46 5.5.1. Policy PP04 ...... 46 5.6. POLICY: PP05 COMMUNITY FACILITIES ...... 47 5.6.1. Policy PP05 ...... 47 5.7. POLICY: PP06 DESIGN IN THE CONSERVATION AREA ...... 48 5.7.1. Policy PP06 ...... 49 5.8. POLICY: PP07 DEVELOPMENT OUTSIDE THE SETTLEMENT BOUNDARY ...... 51 5.8.1. Policy PP07 ...... 51 5.9. POLICY: PP08 VIEWS INTO AND OUT OF THE CONSERVATION AREA ...... 52 5.9.1. Policy PP08 ...... 52 5.10. POLICY: PP09 LISTED BUILDINGS ...... 55 5.10.1. Policy PP09 ...... 55 5.11. POLICY: PP10 TRAFFIC AND CAR PARKING ...... 56 5.11.1. Policy PP10 ...... 56 5.12. POLICY: PP11 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE AND BIODIVERSITY ...... 57 5.12.1. Policy PP11 ...... 57 5.13. POLICY: PP12 LOCAL GREEN SPACES ...... 58 5.13.1. Policy PP12 ...... 59 6. APPENDICES...... 60 6.1. ABBREVIATIONS...... 60 6.2. REFERENCES...... 60

List of Maps FIGURE 1 MAP OF PARISH BOUNDARY ...... 9 FIGURE 2 MAP OF RIGHTS OF WAY ...... 18 FIGURE 3 MAP OF POLICY LOCATIONS ...... 36 FIGURE 4 MAP OF SETTLEMENT BOUNDARY ...... 37 FIGURE 5 MAP OF CONSERVATION AREA ...... 48 FIGURE 6 MAP OF LISTED BUILDINGS ...... 53 FIGURE 7 MAP OF LOCAL GREEN SPACES ...... 58

Page 5 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

1. Introduction

1.1. What is a Neighbourhood Plan?

A Neighbourhood Plan is an opportunity for local people to create a framework for delivering a sustainable future for the benefit of all who live, work or visit the area.

Within the document will be a series of ‘planning policies’ based on firm evidence and these policies will be the defining principle when reviewing planning applications.

The Localism Act 2011 established the right for communities to prepare Neighbourhood Plans and the rules governing their preparation were published in 2012. The government document ‘National Planning Policy Framework’ sets out the Government’s planning policies for England and how these are expected to be applied. An extract from this document states:

Neighbourhood plans 183. Neighbourhood planning gives communities direct power to develop a shared vision for their neighbourhood and deliver the sustainable development they need. Parishes and neighbourhood forums can use neighbourhood planning to: • Set planning policies through neighbourhood plans to determine decisions on planning applications; and • Grant planning permission through Neighbourhood Development Orders and Community Right to Build Orders for specific development which complies with the order. 184. Neighbourhood planning provides a powerful set of tools for local people to ensure that they get the right types of development for their community. The ambition of the neighbourhood should be aligned with the strategic needs and priorities of the wider local area. Neighbourhood plans must be in general conformity with the strategic policies of the Local Plan. To facilitate this, local planning authorities should set out clearly their strategic policies for the area and ensure that an up-to-date Local Plan is in place as quickly as possible. Neighbourhood plans should reflect these policies and neighbourhoods should plan positively to support them. Neighbourhood plans and orders should not promote less development than set out in the Local Plan or undermine its strategic policies. (Extract from National Planning Policy Framework - www.gov.uk)

The Localism Act and the Policy Framework ensure that our community gets the right level of development and sets planning policies that ensures that any planning applications are consistent with the Local Development Plan (LDP) for the village of Pytchley. The Neighbourhood Plan is part of the LDP and therefore has statutory status; this makes it far more relevant than the previously developed Parish Plans, although many of the decisions are based on the findings of these. The main body of this document has been formatted to facilitate understanding, the Planning Policies themselves have been written in a more formal manner to ensure they are not misunderstood or misinterpreted.

A Neighbourhood Plan is not purely a wish list put together by a small group of people but is a document compiled on behalf of the community and stakeholders and the planning policies are seen to be justified by robust statistics and comments within

Page 6 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission the Neighbourhood Plan.

1.1.1. Why does Pytchley need a Neighbourhood Plan

The Parish Council feels that a Neighbourhood Plan is an opportunity, under the umbrella of the Localism Act, to take great control of the future development of the village, and to ensure that major planning decisions are taken locally and in the best interests of the community.

The guiding principle of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) is that of sustainable development. That is not to say that the village of Pytchley shall expand to an unrecognisable entity, but that to ensure the community does not stagnate, any development shall be in a controlled way so that the underlying ‘spirit’ of the village is not lost.

This plan is developed cognisant of other prevailing local plans and policies, Namely:

The North Northamptonshire Joint Core Spatial Strategy 2011- 2031 (referred to within this text as “JCS”

Kettering Borough Council Planning Policies and strategies referenced where relevant.

See also 6.2 References.

Page 7 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

The NPPF explains sustainable development thus:

7. There are three dimensions to sustainable development: economic, social and environmental. These dimensions give rise to the need for the planning system to perform a number of roles:

An economic role – contributing to building a strong, responsive and competitive economy, by ensuring that sufficient land of the right type is available in the right places and at the right time to support growth and innovation; and by identifying and coordinating development requirements, including the provision of infrastructure; A social role – supporting strong, vibrant and healthy communities, by providing the supply of housing required to meet the needs of present and future generations; and by creating a high quality built environment, with accessible local services, including public transport, that reflect the community’s needs and support its health, social and cultural well-being; and An environmental role – contributing to protecting and enhancing our natural, built and historic environment; and, as part of this, helping to improve biodiversity, use natural resources prudently, minimise waste and pollution, and mitigate and adapt to climate change including moving to a low carbon economy.

The Plan has been developed in accordance with these guidelines and mindful of the NPPF principle of ‘a presumption in favour of sustainable development’.

Page 8 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

Figure 1 Map of Parish Boundary

1.2.

Page 9 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

1.3. Plan of designated neighbourhood area.

This map indicates the limit of housing development applied to the village Neighbourhood Plan. For the Settlement Boundary Map supplied by KBC, refer to map “Figure 4 Map of Settlement Boundary”.

1.4. Local Planning Authority Pytchley Parish Council as a “qualifying body” registered the full extent of the administrative parish of Pytchley as the neighbourhood area for the purposes of developing a Neighbourhood Plan. The Parish Council informed KBC that it wished to register to produce a Neighbourhood Plan in May 2015. The Parish Council then formally applied for the area to be registered in October 2015.

The Plan period is designated as 2018 - 2031. The start date is the year that the plan will be ‘made’ (accepted) and the finish date aligns with the finish date of the North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy. This version of the Neighbourhood Plan is designated ‘Submission’ indicating that this Plan that has been reviewed by an independent consultant and also by the Parish Council. The Plan will then be put to the community prior to its submission to the KBC.

The North Northamptonshire Joint Committee adopted the North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy (NNJCS) on 14th July 2016. The NNJCS is now formally part of the Development Plan for North Northamptonshire and supersedes the 2008 Core Spatial Strategy (CSS) in its entirety and also the saved Local Plans policies listed at Appendix 3 of the Plan. The CSS plan can be accessed on the KBC website. The North Northamptonshire Joint Planning Unit can be contacted by post, email, or telephone:

North Northamptonshire Joint Planning Unit c/o East Northamptonshire Council Cedar Drive Thrapston Northamptonshire NN14 4LZ Tel 01832 742355 Email [email protected]

Page 10 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

1.5. Route Map

The production of a Neighbourhood Plan requires certain stages to be completed in a specific order - the following lists indicates each stage

GETTING STARTED

Clarify if a plan is needed Publicise the intention to produce a plan and contact key local partners Speak to the Local Planning Authority

NEIGHBOURHOOD AREA

Consult on and determine neighbourhood area Submit Neighbourhood Area application to the Local Planning Authority Decision on Neighbourhood Area by Local Planning Authority

NEIGHBOURHOOD FORUM

Set up and promote Neighbourhood Forum Develop a forum constitution (RTPI have produced a constitution template) Submit forum proposal to Local Planning Authority Decision on Neighbourhood Forum by Local Planning Authority For parish councils- establish a steering group (if necessary) and associated terms of reference

EARLY STAGE PLAN DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES

Initial meetings/discussions with Local Planning Authority to identify scope of their support to the neighbourhood plan group (i.e. establishing remit of duty to support) Develop a community engagement strategy Engagement Establish plan scope and formulate draft vision and objectives

BUILDING THE EVIDENCE BASE

Meetings/discussions with Local Planning Authority on types of evidence already available and where this can be accessed or contact details of agencies who hold the data. Review existing evidence and Identify and develop further evidence required (either because there is no existing up to date evidence or because the data is only available at a much larger geographic level than the local neighbourhood). Meetings/discussions with Local Planning Authority to discuss whether Strategic Environmental Assessment or Habitats Regulation Assessments are required for the plan.

WRITING THE PLAN

Further develop and refine the issues, vision, aims and objectives as result of the ongoing engagement programme and evidence gathering. Translate the vision and aims in to policies and proposals. Check that your neighbourhood plan policies are in general conformity with the

Page 11 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission strategic policies in the local plan and the National Planning Policy Framework. If not in conformity with the strategic policies in the local plan arrange a meeting to discuss with your local planning authority. If Strategic Environmental Assessment is required- production of associated environmental report (this should be consulted on during the pre-submission consultation of the draft plan). This may need to be updated at a later date if there are substantial changes to the content of the draft plan. Update draft plan if required following the outcomes of the strategic environmental assessment.

PRE-SUBMISSION CONSULTATION, MODIFICATIONS & PREPARING THE PLAN FOR SUBMISSION TO LOCAL PLANNING AUTHORITY

Pre-submission consultation Consider responses to consultation Make relevant amendments to plan as a result of pre-submission consultation Prepare basic conditions statement Prepare consultation statement Submit plan and associated documents required to the Local Planning Authority

INDEPENDENT EXAMINATION

Meet with Local Planning Authority to discuss appointment of examiner and timescales for referendum Regulation 16 consultation (minimum 6 weeks and led by the Local Planning Authority) Examination Examiners report published Meetings and discussions with Local Planning Authority on the suggested recommendations and modifications to the plan (if any) within the examiner’s report and next steps

REFERENDUM

Publication of pre-Referendum information and documents Referendum Publication of Referendum decision

Neighbourhood plan is ‘made’

Page 12 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

2. The Neighbourhood Area

2.1. Pytchley Village - a brief description.

Pytchley Village is a small community located some 3 miles south-west of the centre of Kettering, Northamptonshire and consists of approximately 280 dwellings housing approximately 500 residents. There has been a settlement here for many centuries and is, in fact, mentioned in the Domesday Book.

It is located on gently rising ground going south and affords wide reaching views towards Kettering and beyond in the North, Burton Latimer in the East, Broughton and Rothwell in the Northwest. It is encompassed by open countryside consisting mainly of farmland - arable and livestock - with small woodland or copse areas sparsely located around the area. The nearest villages are Orlingbury (1 mile south), Broughton (1 mile west), and Isham (1 mile east).

Page 13 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

The village is essentially rural in nature and has three working farms within the village boundary. There are three further farms immediately outside of the village but still within the parish. There is also a Golf course/driving range within the parish.

The centre of the village is a conservation area (see Figure 5 Map of Conservation Area) and within this area are some fine grade II listed buildings including large stone-built houses and smaller thatched-roofed cottages. All Saints Church is located almost in the centre of the village and the Overstone Arms Public House is adjacent to the main crossroads. There is a Primary School located originally in the High Street extended into Butchers Lane.

Open spaces within the village are limited to the recreation ground, a protected area in Butchers Lane, and an area allocated for development to the north of the village in Isham Road.

There is a long-established motor coach operator just outside of the village on the Isham Road and a farm machinery repair/servicing operation further along the Isham Road towards the A14.

The A14 trunk road is seen by the community as a natural barrier between the tranquillity of the village and the urban nature of the Kettering east expansion.

Page 14 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

2.2. Facilities

Facilities are limited to the Church, Primary School, Village Hall, and Public House - there are no shops in the village. Most shopping requirements can be met at the Retail Park Shopping Centre located approximately 1 mile to the north of the village, or further afield in Kettering and surrounding large towns. Subsidies for the regular, if sparse, bus service to both Kettering and Wellingborough has been recently withdrawn resulting in a loss of this valuable service.

Page 15 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

2.3. Housing

During the middle of the 20th century the village experienced expansions to the southeast, in Lower End and Church Road. It was at this time that the current recreation ground and village hall were established. There was further expansion to the north in Manor Gardens and behind the school in Butchers Lane. There are currently two major housing schemes that have passed the planning stage and awaiting construction - one on the grounds of Home Farm in Butchers Lane, the other in the old orchard of Dairy Farm on Orlingbury Road. At various times over its history, there has been infill building, resulting in very few opportunities for further expansion.

2.4. Employment

Currently there are limited opportunities for employment within the village - the major employers being the farms, the school, the coach operator and the farm machinery operation. Apart from some home-working, most employment is outside of the village.

2.5. Renewable Energy The village is located in open countryside and the opportunities for providing renewable energy are very limited. There is already a large wind turbine farm 2-3 miles to the east at the Barton Wold Farm.

Page 16 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

2.6. Communications

The village is bisected by two road systems - Isham road/High street/ Broughton Road, and Orlingbury Road/Kettering Road affording links to adjacent villages and also to Kettering and to the main A14 east/west trunk road via Junction 9 to the north of the village.

2.6.1. Road system Both the east-west and the north-south routes are heavily used during rush hours and also suffer from high-speed traffic at all times. Community Speed Watch schemes have been employed to monitor traffic flows and to raise awareness of the issues surrounding speeding.

2.6.2. Footpaths In addition to the road-side pavements within the centre of the village, there are many public footpaths both within the village and in the surrounding open countryside linking adjacent communities, although there are no footpaths to the nearby Retail Park shopping area.

Page 17 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

Figure 2 Map of rights of way

Page 18 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

2.6.3. Broadband Internet High speed broadband is available in the village and it is expected that the current speed will be improved in line with government directives. Recent tests indicate:

Ping Download Upload 412 ms 43.09 Mb/s 6.68 Mb/s

2.6.4. Mobile Phone Reception Mobile reception within the village varies from average to virtually non-existent. The variance is not only related to provider, but also to location in the village. The local antenna is located just outside of the village to the north and some users experience problems due to the ‘shadows’ cast by larger buildings - for example, the Church.

Page 19 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

3. Key Issues

3.1. Background

In 2003 Pytchley Parish Council commissioned a village questionnaire in order to produce a Parish Plan. The questionnaire contained valuable information regarding the residents’ wishes and desires for the development of the village of Pytchley. A report was produced, but due to the time lapse for its acceptance by KBC, a further village questionnaire was commissioned in 2012. This enabled the original plan to be updated to reflect the then current views of the residents. The two documents - Parish Plan 2003 and Parish Plan update 2012 - were submitted to KBC and incorporated by them.

When a decision was made by the Parish Council to produce a Neighbourhood Plan, it was decided that the data within the Parish Plans was a sound and reliable basis to take forward. In addition to this data, an open day was held on 14th May 2016.

At the open day, a full presentation was made of the two original plans. Additionally, display boards were presented depicting various aspects of the village, as highlighted in the original parish plans, augmented by current photographs relating to the aspects of each board. The audience was encouraged to write comments on ‘post-it’ notes for as many subjects as they wished. at the close of the day, all the comments were photographed and then collated.

The day was very well attended and provided useful feedback to the Working Group to provide a valuable update to the original parish plans. This data, combined with the previous information, then provided a firm basis in order to develop the Neighbourhood Plan.

3.2. Main Planning Issues

From the data received and the historical information available from the Parish Plans, it was possible to identify broad headings to represent the main issues raised. From the list of main issues, a clear vision of how the community wishes the village to develop and a full set of objectives can be established. Some objectives are not related to planning issues and are added under a separate heading below.

3.2.1. Housing

Generally, the feeling was that the village layout and current density could not support large-scale development with the exception of the area in Isham Road previously identified by KBC to provide future housing. Currently this area is planned to support the creation of eight units. There is a distinct lack of low-cost starter homes, this was a specific feature that came out of the community questionnaires.

Page 20 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

3.2.2. Commercial Development

Opportunities for commercial development within the village are limited. The village does not lend itself to development areas suitable for large-scale employment. Consistent with the Parish Plan there was strong feeling that there should be no further large commercial development within the parish.

3.2.3. Gypsy/Traveller Accommodation

This did not feature in the Parish Plan and there is therefore no history. However, from the consultation it was clear that there was strong opposition to the siting of a Gypsy/Traveller site within the parish of Pytchley as there is no suitable site.

3.2.4. Sustainability

Land for development for new build properties has been identified on the Isham Road. Further in-fill development that aligns with the general principles of providing a social role and enhances the village environment in accordance with the visions and objectives will be supported.

There are many historical features within the village including Grade II listed buildings and a conservation area.

3.2.5. Renewable Energy

As to be expected this received mixed opinions as it did in the update to the Parish Plan. There was feeling that there should be no wind or solar farms within the parish.

Page 21 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

3.2.6. Facilities

The absence of a shop was lamented with the suggestion that the Pub could meet this need. There is currently a large superstore just over a mile away from the village. The village Hall and recreation grounds are seen as an important asset to the village.

3.3. Non-Planning Community Aspirations

The following issues, although not directly related to planning, evoked a strong feeling from the community and are listed so that any future development is made aware of these issues and ensures that the situation is not aggravated by the development.

3.3.1. Roadways

Both major roads bisecting the village are used as ‘rat runs’ during the rush hours. This leads to large volumes of traffic, much of which exceeds the statutory speed limit. Community Speed Watch campaigns have been employed over a period of years to attempt to raise awareness of the dangers of speeding, but with limited success. Various speed-calming schemes have been suggested to try to alleviate the problem. The construction of the Isham Bypass will help in reducing “cut through” traffic. As would the dualling of the A43 prevent vehicles from traveling north. The additional adoption of flow restricting measures should also be incorporated in the main access points to the village.

3.3.2. Parking

There were many requests from the community for the grassed verges in certain areas to be replaced with hard surfacing to provide off-road parking.

Page 22 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

The other areas where parking is an issue is the High Street where, because of the narrow road width, through traffic is hampered with the result that parked cars are frequently damaged. The problem in the High Street is compounded during school term time with additional parked vehicles during drop-off and pick-up periods.

3.3.3. Litter Residents cited litter as a problem and others suggested that the food takeaway businesses on the Retail Park should be responsible for clearing up the discarded food/drink containers, which litter the village.

3.3.4. Dog mess There are still are dog walkers who do not clear up after their dogs have fouled the pavements.

3.3.5. Playground Equipment There were several remarks about the inadequate playground equipment.

Page 23 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

4. Vision and Objectives

4.1. Vision The following vision and objectives set out how the Plan aims to address the key issues that have been identified through consultation and research.

Vision for Pytchley Village

This Neighbourhood Plan will ensure that the Village of Pytchley will: a) Retain its character as a traditional village, b) Evolve without losing the essential character of the village, c) Ensure that any development will enhance the quality of life for the community and d) Ensure that all developments offer a fully sustainable and thriving rural lifestyle.

4.2. Village Category

Pytchley is classified as a category ‘A’ village. This category is defined in the following extract of the Site Specific Part 2 Local Plan:

Village Categories

13.10 While the JCS groups all villages within Kettering Borough in the same category, it recognises that Part 2 Local Plans may identify villages that have a sensitive character or conservation interest, in which new development will be strictly managed. Within the Rural Area of Kettering Borough, the villages have been categorised into 3 designations, each of which has specific criteria with regards to the scale, nature and design of development in these settlements. These designations have been a consideration through the allocation process as it essential to maintain these designations.

Category A villages

13.11 A majority of the villages in the Rural Area are designated as Category A villages in Policy RS01. In these locations, there is an emphasis to protect their environment and their limited ability to absorb further development.

Page 24 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

13.12 Within these villages development will be on small scale infill sites in accordance with Policy 11 of the JCS. In addition to this, housing allocations have also been identified in some of these villages to meet the rural housing requirement as set out in table 13.1 above.

13.13 Through the allocation process consideration has been given to local needs, character and form of the village and availability of facilities and services. Where housing allocations have been made, the character of the villages in these locations has been recognised in the development principles within the policies for these settlements.

Policy RS1

Category A villages

The villages which are designated Category A status are as follows:

Ashley, Braybrooke, Broughton, Cranford St. Andrew, Cranford St. John, Geddington, Great Cransley, Harrington, Loddington, Mawsley, Pytchley, Rushton, Stoke Albany, Sutton Bassett, Thorpe Malsor, Weston by Welland and Wilbarston

Development in these villages will need to: a. Be in accordance with Policy 11 of the JCS; b. Take into account the level of existing infrastructure and services in the individual villages, as well as the proximity of these to larger settlements; c. Be within the defined settlement boundary and classed an infill development, unless it can be demonstrated that it can meet the criteria under Policy 13 (Rural Exceptions) or Policy 25 (Rural Economic Development and Diversification) of the Joint Core Strategy or unless allocated in this Plan or a Neighbourhood Plan; d. Show consideration and be sympathetic to the existing size, form, character and setting in the village; and e. Be compatible with other relevant policies in both the Parts 1 and 2 Local Plans or Neighbourhood Plans.

For further policies relating to ‘The Role of Villages’, ‘Rural Area Development Principles’, and ‘Development in the Open Countryside’, refer to the Site Specific Part 2 Local Plan.

Page 25 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

4.3. Objectives In order to deliver the Vision and to take forward into Planning Policies, a series of objectives have been established. These objectives summarise the key issues identified previously and are listed as broad statements of intent.

Item Description Related Policy/Policies No. Build housing within the defined Settlement 1 PP01, PP02 Boundary Provide for village housing needs including 2 PP01, PP02 affordable housing Ensure that new buildings are designed in 3 PP01, PP04 keeping with the local environment. Encourage new businesses into the village 4 PP03, PP04 without impacting existing infrastructure. Protect important areas of open spaces and PP07, PP08, PP11, 5 ensure country views are maintained. PP12 Ensure that the potential future density of 6 PP02, PP10 through traffic is managed. Address Parking issues relating to residents 7 PP02, PP10 and visitors. Encourage greater use of walking and 8 PP11 cycling. Ensure that any new development is 9 supported by timely review and update of PP02, PP05 local infrastructure. Encourage the maintenance and, if required, 10 improvement of existing properties within the PP06, PP08 village boundary. Retain and protect the setting of the village 11 PP07, PP12 within the open countryside

Page 26 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

5. The Planning Policies

These Planning Policies have been developed from the criteria identified in the previous sections. They have encompassed the features and principles summarized in the Visions and Objectives sections.

Each Policy is indexed by a unique number and is appended by a policy intention, and an evidenced-based justification of the policy. Where evidence is taken from the previous Village Plans (2003 and 2012), only the relevant paragraph numbers are referenced.

The relevant Planning Committees, when deciding on Planning Applications relating to the Parish of Pytchley, shall use the Policies in addition to the Local Development Plan and Government Legislation.

The following documents have been included within the Local Development Plan and Government legislation which are listed here. Also refer to the Appendices section of this document.

• North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy (Adopted July 2016) • Site Specific Part2 Local Plan • National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF)

For each policy there is a section labelled ‘Evidence’. Within this section there are references to specific paragraphs or sub-sections in the Village Plan (2003 and 2012) and also the First Consultation Report relating to this Neighbourhood Plan. In the interests of reducing repetition and maintaining clarity, an extract of all the referenced sections has been added here and cross-referenced in each individual Policy.

5.1. Extract of Previous Reports

Parish Plan - section 2 “It is notable that not a single person felt that large groups of houses outside or bordering the village should be built. There was, however, a certain amount of sympathy to bringing disused properties and conversions into housing use (44%) and limited infill development (25%). Some 18% favoured small developments (less than 10 houses). 42% wanted no further houses in the village.

Comments received regarding housebuilding are summarised in Appendix 6 with some 38 respondents (Q6a) citing a need for smaller affordable starter homes with a further 2 suggesting housing association homes.

10 respondents specifically indicated that any development should be in character with the village. This however is likely to be the view of the majority of the village and certainly that of the Parish Council. There were no specific sites which showed any favour and of the sites that were suggested in no case were any of them suggested by more than one respondent, and, as such, cannot be considered as a village opinion.

There is a clear conflict with a reluctance to see any significant house building but an acknowledged need for affordable housing. The probable view is that the village is at

Page 27 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission its optimum size with a good mix of property types. However, unless or until the smaller properties are more affordable then the problem for new/young families will continue. This is a national problem not exclusive to Pytchley.

Whilst a desire for affordable social housing was suggested by several respondents. It should be borne in mind that the allocation of social housing is out of the control of the Parish Council and there is no guarantee, therefore, that village people will be given priority purely as a result of their local connections.”

Parish Plan – section 2.3 “2.3 HOUSE BUILDING (Q6) In response to should more housing be built in Pytchley the following table gives both this percentage and the absolute figures. (The total responses are greater than the total number of respondents as many ticked more than one category).

It is notable that not a single person felt that large groups of houses outside or bordering the village should be built. There was, however, a certain amount of sympathy to bringing disused properties and conversions into housing use (44%) and limited infill development (25%). Some 18% favoured small developments (less than 10 houses). 42% wanted no further houses in the village. Comments received regarding housebuilding are summarised in Appendix 6 with some 38 respondents (Q6a) citing a need for smaller affordable starter homes with a further 2 suggesting housing association homes.

10 respondents specifically indicated that any development should be in character with the village. This however is likely to be the view of the majority of the village and certainly that of the Parish Council. There were no specific sites which showed any favour and of the sites that were suggested in no case were any of them suggested by more than one respondent, and, as such, cannot be considered as a village opinion.

There is a clear conflict with a reluctance to see any significant house building but an acknowledged need for affordable housing. The probable view is that the village is at its optimum size with a good mix of property types. However, unless or until the smaller properties are more affordable then the problem for new/young families will continue. This is a national problem not exclusive to Pytchley. Whilst a desire for affordable social housing was suggested by several respondents. It should be borne in mind that the allocation of social housing is out of the control of the Parish Council and there is no guarantee, therefore, that village people will be

Page 28 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission given priority purely as a result of their local connections.”

Parish Plan – section 3 “3 DEVELOPMENT There appeared to be a desire to restrict further development in general as can be seen from the results of specific questions as follows: 3.1 DEVEOPMENT OUTSIDE THE VILLAGE BOUNDARY (Q36) Some 59% were opposed to any development outside the village boundary with just 9% in favour. The questions on development (within Q37) gave a similarly strong view as follows “Prevent further development” 60% for, 13% against “Build more houses” 18% for with 45% against further house building “Build more business premises” 10% in favour with 54% opposed Where respondents were in favour of development, in many of these cases, this was qualified by comments elsewhere in the returned form (mainly Q’s 6a, 45 & 46) In other comments within the questionnaire a number of respondents specifically identified Kettering Road and the green wedge between Kettering and Pytchley as sacrosanct and to be protected with no development. There was a fear expressed that Pytchley would be absorbed within an expanding Kettering if any development were to be allowed. Similarly, to a lesser extent Isham Road was identified where further development may lead to merging of Kettering and Pytchley. With the threat of further development as a result of the Milton Keynes and South Midland Study we must ensure Pytchley preserves its identity and separation from Kettering. Whilst a total restriction on development to the North of the village (Kettering/Pytchley Lane) and to the East (Isham Road) must be ensured we must also endeavour to protect all the present boundaries of the village together with the general rural scene surrounding and within the village. These views have been communicated to both KBC and NCC.”

Parish Plan - section 3.2 “3.2 ACTIONS As a parish council we should oppose developments in or adjacent to the village which may destroy its character. Developments along Isham Road, Kettering Road/Pytchley Lane should be vigorously opposed because of the risk of annexing with Kettering. Nevertheless, we should take a sympathetic view to conversion of disused buildings when in keeping with the character of the village and rural scene.”

Parish Plan – section 4.3 “4.3 PARKING (Q’s 8, 9 & 9a) From the survey there are some 52 cars plus 2 commercial vehicles normally parked on the road. Parking difficulties experienced are as follows: note: people who normally park off the road have also expressed concerns regarding parking and again also some people ticked more than one category.

Width of road Other parked vehicles on road Traffic volume/speed Adjacent road junction Fear of crime (car/contents theft) 38 (14%) 57 (20%) 42 (15%) 15 (5%) 45 (16%)

Page 29 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

From Q37 192 respondents (69%) wished to see parking on pavements stopped (25 respondents favoured pavement parking). From free comments several respondents were concerned that vehicles parked on pavements caused pedestrians, particularly mothers with prams to walk into the road. Cars are often parked on pavements where, and because, traffic flow is fast, or the road width restricted. This increases the danger to those forced to walk in the road. For the under 17 age group some 55% were opposed to pavement parking. There were also 61% in favour of stopping parking on grass verges with 14% happy for the practice to continue. For the under 17 age group there were 47% opposed to parking on verges with 10% in favour. 7 adult respondents and one under 17 (5-11 age group) referenced the school as a problem area with parking, particularly the effect it had on other traffic (see below). Additional off-road parking (either by free or discounted drop kerbs or additional parking bays) was suggested by 21 respondents. 6 respondents made various suggestions relating to imposing parking restrictions.

4.3.1 ACTION Certain roads within the village are narrow but lend themselves easily to the provision of “off-road” parking. Lower End and Church Road are good examples. Measures will therefore be taken to encourage more off-road parking in these cases by liaising with NCC for possible discounting on the price of dropped kerbs and KBC for the provision of additional parking bays. Whilst grass verges look attractive this is only the case when they are not churned up by car wheels. The majority of the population wished to see parking on grass verges eliminated and the parish council will endeavour to discourage this practice. Similarly parking on pavements will be actively discouraged and the police approached to take appropriate action.”

Page 30 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

Parish Plan – section 7.2.1 Village Hall/Recreation Ground/Public House/Church

Parish Plan – section 7.3 Village Hall “7.3 VILLAGE HALL (Q25, 28 & 29) The importance of the village hall can be judged by the responses in Q25 with 83% of adults and 53% of under 17’s rating it as important or very important. From Q26 for the adult population 25% use the hall regularly with a further 58% using it occasionally and 5% of under 17’s use the hall regularly with a further 50% using it occasionally. These figures imply that 83 % adults and 55% of under 17’s use the village hall to some extent.”

Parish Plan – section 7.4.1 Recreation Ground “7.4.1 Recreation Ground – Value and Usage (Q’s 25 & 26) The recreation ground was perceived as an important feature within the village with 77% under 17’s and 84% adults rating it as important or very important (Q25). 18% adults use it regularly (the major proportion of these being females in the 26-45 year age group presumably minding children). A further 50% of adults use the recreation ground occasionally. For the under 17’s 39% use it regularly with a further 26% using it occasionally. This implies that 68% adults and 65% under 17’s have some use of the recreation ground.”

Page 31 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

Parish Plan – section 8.2

Parish Plan – section 8.5 “8.5 ASPECTS OF THE VILLAGE WHICH SHOULD BE PROTECTED (Q46) Again, there was a diversity of responses but clearly the rural nature of the village was valued highly with 21 responses (8%) valuing Character/ruralness, 19 (7%) valuing the surrounding countryside and 21 (8%) valuing Village life and community spirit. It is also worthy of note that 22 respondents (8%) valued its separation from Kettering.”

Parish Plan – section 10 Church “10 RELIGION (Q25, 26 and 35) 68% adults and 37% under 17’s rated the church as important or very important, however, it is not known to what extent this is as a place of worship or as a landmark. 13% adults used the church regularly with a further 44% using it occasionally. 16% under 17’s use the church regularly and 50% use it occasionally. 55% adults and 45% under 17’s were aware of the Sunday school. See also Appendix 1 which gives an outline of the church as seen by the Priest in Charge, Father Michael Wray.”

Parish Plan update – “Heritage Trust” “Since the launch of the original document The Heritage Trust has been formed. The purpose of this trust is to raise money to repair, maintain and improve the church and to encourage the community as a whole to use the building for suitable events: music, meetings, exhibitions and so on.”

Parish Plan update - Appdx 12 (4.3.1) “4.3.1 PARKING Reduce pavement parking Provide additional off-road parking in the form of “lay-bys” replacing the grass verges in Church Road On roads with fast moving traffic motorists are inclined to park vehicles partly on the

Page 32 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission pavement. This forces mothers with prams and wheelchair users to use the road (with its fast traffic) Where there are grass verges these get rutted by parked vehicles and prevent grass cutting. It is acknowledged that councils are NCC undergoing strict budget restrictions and early action is not anticipated. However in the longer term we should encourage KBC to consider replacing the grass verges on the northern side of Church Road as they have done on the southern side. The present grass verges have vehicles parked on them preventing any grass cutting and churning them up to an unsightly mess.”

Parish Plan update - Appdx 12 (2.3) “2.3 HOUSING Encourage KBC to give priority for social housing within the village to those with village connections There is no change in this regard as KBC it is inhibited to some degree by national government policy and housing is allocated on a need basis.”

Parish Plan update - Appdx 12 (3.2) “3.2 DEVELOPMENT Ensure the village boundary is maintained at the present build limit Protect the green space between Kettering and Pytchley to ensure Pytchley’s separation from Kettering Ongoing We believe this is the present wish of KBC. Pytchley wishes to retain its village atmosphere as an individual entity separate from Kettering.”

Parish Plan update - Appdx 12 (7.2 & 8.5) “8.5 & 7.2 VILLAGE CHARACTER Protection of village character and features. See also 3.2 above The objection to nearby wind farms should be noted This has not changed since the original plan. The village character including the church, pub, school etc. are seen as important features of the village as does the general rural atmosphere. It is essential that building development is not allowed to impact on the rural nature of the village.”

Neighbourhood Plan Consultation Report – section “Housing” “6.0. Housing

Parish Plan Section [2]

There was agreement with the small-scale development proposed by KBC (involving the development for housing in Isham Road). (Appendix 4). Similarly, it was agreed that that there should be no large developments and the village envelope should be considered sacrosanct. This concurs with the Parish Plan section on Housing [ 2.3] and Development [3] where there was a reluctance to see large scale building but recognising the need for some affordable housing

There was a distinct view that new properties should ideally be built in stone and in keeping with adjacent properties.

There was strong feeling that there in a need for starter houses rather than large properties.

Page 33 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

Concern was expressed regarding proposed development in the orchard at Dairy Farm in Orlingbury Road. Any development in this area or in the remaining green spaces within the village should be resisted.”

Neighbourhood Plan Consultation Report – section “Development” “8.0. Commercial Development There are areas adjacent to the A14 J9 (planned for commercial development including a site off Isham Road. Concern was expressed regarding traffic issues with the likelihood that vehicles will use Pytchley as a short-cut through to the A43 and may use it to circumvent any bottlenecks likely to occur on the A509 through Isham. There were a number of suggestions that this development should not take place until completion of the Isham By-pass. This will avoid further traffic issues in Isham and perhaps reduce the incidence of traffic using Pytchley to avoid Isham. There were also requests that restrictions be put in place to minimise traffic accessing the development from Isham Road. . The development proposed in Isham Road is in conflict with the views expressed in the Parish Plan [3.2] but nevertheless has been imposed by a higher authority. It is important that the nature of this development is sympathetic to the views and wishes of the village and some gain to the village should be extracted. It should not be taken as a precedent for further development in or around that area. Disappointment was also expressed that much of this development adjacent to the A14 J9 (Symmetry Park) was likely to involve warehousing offering very few skilled jobs. A preference for manufacturing, hi tech and other skilled employment was clearly expressed. Concern was also expressed regarding both light and noise pollution and measures must be put in place to avoid these problems either by prevention or subsequent amelioration. Dix Chicken Farm to the South of Pytchley was cited as an example of both light and odour nuisance. It was specifically commented that there should be no waste recycling/processing facilities within Pytchley or ideally within close proximity to the parish boundary. Consistent with the Parish Plan there was strong feeling that there should be no further commercial development within the parish. [3.2].”

Neighbourhood Plan Consultation Report – section “Cars/Traffic” “7.0. Cars/Traffic [Parish Plan reference 4.3 & 4.4] There is real concern regarding the speed of through traffic using the village as a “rat run” Similarly there are parking issues around the village some areas having limited space and also there are many examples of poor and dangerous parking especially around the school. 7.0.1. Parking There were many requests for the grassed verges in certain areas to be replaced with hard surfacing to provide off road parking. Parking takes place informally on the grass with the result that the grass cannot be cut and it is invariable rutted and muddy. This is particularly relevant in Church Road. Whilst it would be preferred to retain the grass verges it has to be accepted that residents need somewhere convenient to park. The best compromise would be to replace the grassed verges with “Grasscrete”. The other areas where parking is an issue is in Lower End, where the only solution would be to cut back into the high bank providing parking bays, and the High Street where because of the narrowness of the road through traffic is hampered with the result that parked cars are frequently damaged. The problem in

Page 34 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission the High Street is compounded during term time with additional parked vehicles. There were many examples cited of both illegal and dangerous parking particularly at junctions with concern that there is no police presence to enforce regulations. The school is particularly bad especially at pick-up and drop-off times and children have been put in danger by thoughtless motorists. 7.0.2 Traffic As with the Parish Plan there was much concern regarding the speed and volume of through traffic and whilst it is accepted that motorists have an unquestionable right to use the roadways in the village there should be some recognition that it involves rural roads many narrow without pavements and that speed limits prevail. Where motorists wish to save time on their journeys then the main roads are more appropriate. Speeding through the village is not acceptable. There was a clear demand for both traffic calming and enforcement by the police. These issues again are directly in line with the Parish Plan.”

Page 35 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

5.2. Policy Location Map

Figure 3 Map of Policy Locations

Page 36 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

1

8

2

3

7

6

5 4

Key Proposed settlement boundary

Reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey Title: on behalf of HMSO. © Crown Copyright 2019 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Plan - Proposed settlement boundary All rights reserved.

Licence 100017647

Date: 18:04:19 Scale: 1:5000 Drawn by: KBC

Figure 4 Map of Settlement Boundary Reference: Local Plan (interim version). For key see next page.

Page 37 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

Page 38 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

Page 39 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

Page 40 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

5.3. Policy: PP01 Pytchley Settlement Boundary

Overview This Policy defines the settlement boundary for the village and development that will be acceptable within these limits. Reference is made to the defining principles on Page 6/7 of the Settlement Boundary Background Paper - see References, paragraph 6.2. These principles were used when defining the settlement boundary.

Intent The intent is not to completely stop any development, but to ensure any future building work does not ‘overwhelm’ the existing character of the village.

5.3.1. Policy PP01 The Neighbourhood Plan designates a Pytchley Settlement Boundary, as shown on the Policies Map, within which proposals for an infill housing development may be supported.

Any development within this settlement boundary (not already the subject of planning application) would detract significantly from the rural character of the village. Any development outside this boundary would similarly impact significantly on the character of the village and any development along Isham Road or Kettering road would increase the risk of coalesce with Kettering to the detriment of the character of the village and the rural surrounding aspect of Kettering

New homes on the infill sites within the Pytchley Settlement Boundary may be permitted where: • The proposal respects the character and pattern of development; • The design reflects local character; • The proposal complies with the other policies of this Neighbourhood Plan; and • The amenities of adjacent residents are not unduly affected.

Development for homes behind existing frontages of housing will be strictly controlled, New development in existing back gardens within the Settlement Boundary will not be supported particularly where there is no defensible boundary to open countryside and where the amenities of residents on the frontage would be adversely affected by overlooking and disturbance to minimise the risk of inappropriate overdevelopment and to protect the historic character and pattern of the village.

This is particularly relevant for Isham Road, Lower End and Church Road.

Evidence Parish Plan - section 3.2 Parish Plan - section 2 Parish Plan update - Appdx 12 (2.3) Neighbourhood Plan Consultation Report – section “Housing”

Page 41 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

Policy: PP02 Housing Site Allocation

Proposed Housing Allocation

Key Proposed housing allocation

Reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey Title: on behalf of HMSO. © Crown Copyright 2019 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Plan - Proposed housing allocation All rights reserved.

Licence 100017647

Date: 18:04:19 Scale: 1:5000 Drawn by: KBC

Overview This Policy identifies any areas within the village that have already been allocated for development and defines the scope of the development(s).

Page 42 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

Intent To ensure that any new development is in keeping with the local amenities.

5.3.2. Policy PP02 The Neighbourhood Plan allocates land east of Pytchley village for residential use. The location is shown on the Policies Map and also on the Settlement Boundary Map (Figure 4 Map of Settlement Boundary). This site was included within a report taken to Planning Policy Committee. It was agreed to be included within the draft SSP2 for future review.

KBC document Site Specific Part 2 Local Plan – Housing Allocation Background Paper May 2018 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) identified housing development possibilities within the rural areas and in particular Pytchley. Since release of that document 3 new properties have been provided within Pytchley and a further 9 units have been approved. The KBC Rural Masterplan Document 2012 suggests that the only site where housing may be provided is that identified as RA117 with the proposal that it could accommodate 8 units. This was further supported in the SSP pt2. However, should housing demand dictate then it may be possible for this site to accommodate a maximum of 12 units. This would further protect Pytchley from further development proposals whilst still meeting local needs.

Proposals for the development of the land will be supported, provided: • The scheme delivers approximately 8 - 12 new houses; • The scheme has a mix of 2, 3 and 4-bedroom types of homes to meet local needs and makes provision for affordable homes; • The site has the facility to offer off-street parking to avoid parking on the public highway and can ensure that a footpath to the village boundary is established. • The number of parking spaces should concur with National Recommendations; • An ecological impact assessment is carried out to evidence and propose a biodiversity mitigation strategy with the aim of the scheme delivering a net biodiversity gain for the loss of any value identified on the former land; • The layout and landscape scheme: o Provide for a landscape buffer on the northern boundary of the site to create a defensible boundary that will prevent access to land to the north of the site; o Retain as much of the hedgerow that run around the site as possible as part of the agreed biodiversity improvement strategy; o Have regard to the amenities of adjoining residential properties in Isham Road. • Appropriate traffic calming schemes and environmental improvements are provided at the entrances to and within Pytchley.

Note: Informal discussions with the landowner indicates that they are sympathetic to these proposals and as such this development is deliverable

Evidence

Reference is made to the following sections extracted from previous Village Plans and updates and an extract is included. These Village plans reflect most accurately

Page 43 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission the wishes of the village residents:

Parish Plan – section 2.3 Parish Plan - section 3.2 Neighbourhood Plan Consultation Report – section “Housing”

Page 44 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

5.4. Policy: PP03 Commercial Land and Buildings within the Settlement Boundary

Overview This Policy addresses the development of commercial buildings within the village boundary. Item 12 - top of page 12 of NPPF suggests that Neighbourhood Plan takes precedence.

Intent The intent of this policy is to ensure that commercial development does not impinge on the overall character of the village. Page 12 of NPPF suggests that Neighbourhood Plan takes precedence

5.4.1. Policy PP03 Proposals to retain and improve services within the Settlement Boundary will be supported. Proposals for the redevelopment or change of use of premises used for retail or other local services will not be permitted unless it can be demonstrated that their location and premises are no longer viable and proposed changes conform to design requirements in this Neighbourhood Plan.

Proposals to enhance, extend and protect existing services, as well as to develop new facilities, will be supported, provided that they do not harm residential amenity and that they conform to the other design requirements in this Neighbourhood Plan.

For the purposes of this policy, ‘Commercial Land and Buildings’ means uses falling within Use Classes ’A’ and ‘B’ of the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987 (as amended) or closely similar sui generis uses.

Evidence

Parish Plan – section 3 Parish Plan - section 3.2 Neighbourhood Plan Consultation Report – section “Development”

Page 45 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

5.5. Policy: PP04 Commercial Land and Buildings throughout the Parish Overview This Policy deals with the re-use of redundant land through the Neighbourhood Plan area excluding land at Kettering South covered by policy 37 of the NNJCS

Intent The intent of this policy is to ensure that the reuse of any redundant land or building will only be developed under restricted conditions.

5.5.1. Policy PP04 New proposals for the redevelopment or change of use of land or buildings in employment or commercial use to non-employment uses will only be permitted if the existing use is no longer viable.

Proposals to enhance, extend and protect existing employment sites, as well as to develop new facilities, will only be supported, provided that they do not damage the built and natural environment and that they conform to the other design requirements in this Neighbourhood Plan.

For the purposes of this policy, ‘Commercial Land and Buildings’ means uses falling within Use Classes ’A’ and ‘B’ of the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987 (as amended) or closely similar sui generis uses.

This should be read in conjunction with Policy 8 of the JCS and Policy 3 (consistent with Chapter 15 – para 170) of the NPPF which seeks development to be designed in a way that is sensitive to landscape setting.

Evidence

Most employment sites within the village are already identified by higher authorities and would serve workers from outside the village and would provide more than enough employment to meet existing and anticipated future village needs No other land has been identified within the Parish.

Page 46 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

5.6. Policy: PP05 Community Facilities Overview This policy deals with existing and proposed community facilities within the settlement boundary.

Intent The intent is to ensure that any existing facilities within the village are not altered to the detriment of the overall village enjoyment.

5.6.1. Policy PP05 The retention and enhancement of local community facilities will be supported. Proposals involving the loss of facilities will not be permitted unless it can be demonstrated that they are no longer viable whilst proposals to change the use of an asset must demonstrate that all reasonable steps have been taken to retain its present use and community value.

Proposals to enhance, extend and protect existing local community facilities, as well as to develop new facilities, will be supported, provided that they do not damage the residential environment and that they conform to the other requirements in this Neighbourhood Plan and Policy 7 of the North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy.

Evidence

Current facilities within the village are well supported as demonstrated by observation and village consultation.

Parish Plan – section 7.3 Village Hall (See also deed and constitution of village hall) Parish Plan – section 7.4.1 Recreation Ground Parish Plan – section 7.2.1 Village Hall/Recreation Ground/Public House/Church Parish Plan – section 10 Church Parish Plan update – “Heritage Trust”

Page 47 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

Figure 5 Map of Conservation Area

5.7. Policy: PP06 Design in The Conservation Area

Overview The policy determines the amount of alteration within the conservation area.

Page 48 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

Intent The intent is to ensure that the core conservation area of the village is not altered such that the overall character of the village is reduced.

5.7.1. Policy PP06 Proposals for development should preserve and enhance the historic character and appearance of the Pytchley Conservation Area (designated by KBC on 2nd May 1984 (Minute 83.PT.389), as shown in the Policies Map, and its wealth of listed buildings and other heritage assets.

All planning applications within the Conservation Area must demonstrate how the design of proposals have sought to preserve and enhance the special architectural or historic interest of the area identified in the Pytchley Conservation Area Appraisal.

The design of development proposals should reflect the style of existing buildings and the character of the street-scape in respect of the use of construction materials and finishes for buildings or extensions. New buildings should be of a scale, size, colour and proportions to complement the character of traditional buildings in the Conservation Area - refer to the CPRE Design Guide for examples. Where approved, modern replacement and/or new build materials should visually complement the immediate environment.

Any proposals for alterations or modernisation of commercial buildings should reflect their heritage, retain any existing traditional frontage, and ensure that the installation of modern infrastructure is as unobtrusive as possible.

Proposals to subdivide residential plots to enable development in rear gardens will be resisted as harmful to the special architectural or historic interest of the Conservation Area.

Proposals for semi-permanent additions to properties such as signage, satellite dishes, and solar panels must have full regard to their effect on the appearance of the Conservation Area. Conditions pertaining to these imposed by Conservation Area designation should be strictly enforced.

Evidence

Parish Plan update - Appdx 12 (7.2 & 8.5)

Page 49 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

Recent example of building refurbishment to match existing. When rebuilding the annex, existing bricks and roof tiles were re-used, window and surround were engineered to match the existing.

Page 50 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

5.8. Policy: PP07 Development outside the Settlement Boundary

Overview This policy addresses development outside of the Settlement Boundary. The main focus is on development other than new homes and is in addition to policy PP01. This policy specifically excludes land at Kettering South which is covered by policy 37 of the NNJCS.

Intent The intent of this policy is to ensure that any future development does not impact on the overall character and setting of the village within its Parish.

5.8.1. Policy PP07 Development proposals on land outside the defined settlement boundary will only be supported in the countryside where such development is necessary for the purposes of agriculture or forestry, or for enterprise, diversification, recreation or tourism that benefit the rural economy without harming countryside and villagers’ interests. New isolated homes in the countryside will not be supported except in accordance with this Neighbourhood Plan and permitted development legislation.

The term ‘Development’ shall refer to the definition as defined in the Town and Country Planning Act. Exceptions to this definition are to be found in the JCS, namely Policy 13 (Rural Exceptions) and Policy 25 (Rural Development and Diversification).

The restrictions shall include, but not limited to, items such as: • New and existing agricultural buildings • Equestrian activities and uses • Barn conversions or re-use of existing permanent buildings • Solar farms or wind turbines • Other outdoor recreational uses

Evidence

Page 51 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

5.9. Policy: PP08 Views into And Out of The Conservation Area

Overview To ensure the open aspect of the village is maintained.

Intent The intent of this policy is to limit any development that would impact on the enjoyment of the views over the local open countryside.

5.9.1. Policy PP08 Proposals for the development that affects views into and of out of the Conservation Area will only be supported if they do not obstruct views to the Area from beyond the village, and views of the surrounding countryside from within all parts of the village. It should be explicitly recognised in any planning decision that the views into and out of the Conservation Area form part of the area's special character. This is particularly relevant in the case of the Church a grade 1 listed building prominent from many aspects of the village and having a commanding view down the valley mainly in a southerly direction.

Proposals for the redevelopment of previously developed land or for the alteration of buildings on land that is considered significant in forming an essential setting to the special architectural or historic interest of the Conservation Area by all the residents will only be supported if they do not detract from its character or appearance.

Stone boundary walls within the conservation are a significant historical feature of the village. All future development within the conservation area must ensure that existing walls are preserved and maintained where possible.

Evidence

Parish Plan – section 8.2 Parish Plan – section 8.5

Policy 8 (d) of the JCS, consistent with Chapter 12 of the NPPF seeks development to respond to the site’s immediate and wider context and local character. Policy 3 of the JCS, consistent with Chapter 15 (para. 170) of the NPPF, seeks development to be designed in a way that is sensitive to landscape setting.

Page 52 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

Figure 6 Map of Listed Buildings

Page 53 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

Key to Map

1. Church of All Saints - Grade I 2. Dower House - Grade II 3. Glebe House - Grade II 4. Keeper's Cottage - Grade II 5. Lodge Cottage - Grade II 6. Old School House - Grade II 7. Pigeoncote, Coach House and Stable 20 Metres West of Pytchley House - Grade II 8. Pytchley Grange Farmhouse and Short Flanking Fences and Gates - Grade II ** 9. Pytchley House - Grade II 10. Pytchley Lodge Farmhouse - Grade II ** 11. Pytchley Manor House - Grade II 12. Rustic Summerhouse 30 Metres South of Pytchley House - Grade II 13. The Cottage - Grade II 14. The Thatched House - Grade II

** = Located outside of the village Settlement Boundary. See section: 5.2

Page 54 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

5.10. Policy: PP09 Listed Buildings

Overview To state the importance of maintaining listed buildings.

Intent The intent of this policy is to work closely with Local Planning, English Heritage, and other agencies to ensure that Listed Buildings are maintained as required by the Law.

5.10.1. Policy PP09 Proposals that will result in harm to, or loss of, a building or structure that has been identified as a Listed Building will be resisted unless it can be demonstrated that the harm is unavoidable and that the public benefits of the proposals outweigh the harm. This is consistent with current listed building regulations which must be observed.

Evidence

National policies on listed buildings.

Note that this policy has been included in addition to the requirements of the NPPF and JCS to highlight the location of all listed buildings within the Development Boundary.

Page 55 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

5.11. Policy: PP10 Traffic and Car Parking

Overview To limit the effect of any possible increase in traffic within and through the village.

Intent The intent of this Policy is to ensure that on-street parking is restricted, and that off- street parking is encouraged. Traffic volumes within and through the village are a particular problem for the village.

5.11.1. Policy PP10 Proposals for all types of development will only be supported where it is demonstrated that there is no adverse impact on the road network and pedestrian safety would not be compromised. Mitigation measures will be required for proposals resulting in significantly increased traffic movements that have negative impacts.

All development proposals where a transport assessment is required as part of a planning application must evaluate the effects of additional traffic movements generated by the development on the core local road network comprising the Isham Road, Orlingbury Road, Kettering Road, and Broughton Road. Such traffic analysis must also evaluate the impact of additional traffic flows and speed on to and off of these major thoroughfares.

Proposals to increase the number of bedrooms in a property must include a commensurate increase in the number of off-street car parking spaces. Proposals for new, or extensions to existing, commercial premises or community facilities must demonstrate the adequacy of off-street car parking spaces.

Proposals that require planning consent to create new parking spaces using residential frontages will be supported.

A standard residential parking space is considered to have minimum dimensions of 2.44 metres by 4.88 metres plus additional space surrounding it to allow adequate pedestrian access. Parking spaces contained within garages will only be regarded as a parking space if they have minimum dimensions of 3 metres by 6 metres internally.

All development must comply with the requirements of NCC highways and shall not be harmful to the historic character of the area or where a suitable access onto the highway cannot be achieved.

Evidence

Parish Plan – section 4.3 Parish Plan update - Appdx 12 (4.3.1) Neighbourhood Plan Consultation Report – section “Cars/Traffic”

Page 56 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

5.12. Policy: PP11 Green Infrastructure and Biodiversity

Overview To ensure ecological and biodiversity issues are addressed.

Intent The intent of this Policy is to ensure that any existing ‘green’ areas, including but not limited to those referenced in Policy PP12, are protected and that any new developments embrace the principle of biodiversity during the planning stage.

5.12.1. Policy PP11 New development will be required to endeavour to retain trees and hedgerows. Where they are unavoidably lost, replacement trees and hedgerows using indigenous species must be planted. New development will be required to respect local landscape character, in particular by minimising the impact of new development on views into and out of the village.

Where new housing development with integral open space is brought forward, developers will be expected to cooperate with the establishment of appropriate long- term arrangements for the management of this open space. Developers will be required to provide financial contributions or other means to support initial costs and ongoing maintenance, and/or to transfer land to an appropriate body, by agreement with the planning authority.

Proposals to extinguish or to divert significantly an existing footpath as a result of development schemes will be resisted.

Development proposals that enable the provision of new footpaths, bridleways and cycle-ways in and around the village will be supported and encouraged, provided that they accord with other policies of this Neighbourhood Plan and have regard to the principles of the district-wide green infrastructure strategy as detailed in the Green Infrastructure Delivery Plan – March 2018.

Evidence

Policy 8 (d) of the JCS, consistent with Chapter 12 of the NPPF seeks development to respond to the site’s immediate and wider context and local character. Policy 3 of the JCS, consistent with Chapter 15 (para. 170) of the NPPF, seeks development to be designed in a way that is sensitive to landscape setting.

The development of three properties in Orlingbury Road have demonstrated the ability of developers to act in accordance with this policy

Page 57 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

5.13. Policy: PP12 Local Green Spaces

–

–

LowerGreen see note no.1seenote

Recreation Ground no.2seenote

Crossroads no.3seenote

–

see note no.4 seenote Paddock

Figure 7 Map of local green spaces

Page 58 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

Overview Identify existing local open areas within the village as shown on the map.

Intent 1. The intent of this policy is to identify existing local Green Space and to ensure that they are protected from development. The purpose of Local Green Space is to provide special protection against development for green areas of particular importance to local communities (NPPG Paragraph 005, Ref Id 37- 005-20140306).

5.13.1. Policy PP12 In order for these green spaces to be designated as ‘Local Green Spaces’ they must meet the definition under paragraph 77 of the NPPF: • Where the green space is in reasonably close proximity to the community it serves • Where the green area is demonstrably special to a local community and holds a particular local significance, for example because of its beauty, historic significance, recreational value (including as a playing field), tranquility or richness of its wildlife and • Where the green area concerned is local in character and is not an extensive tract of land.

The Neighbourhood Plan and SSP2 designates the following locations as Local Green Spaces, as shown:

1. Lower Green - adjacent to Dairy Farm 2. Recreation Ground - bounded by Lower End and Church Road. 3. Triangle at the main crossroads of High Street/Isham Road and Stringers Hill/Kettering Road. 4. Paddock in Orlingbury Road adjacent to Butchers Lane.

Proposals for development on the identified land will not be supported.

Evidence

KBC identified area – Site Specific Part 2 Local Plan, Historically and Visually Important Local Green Space Background Paper References HVI033.

• Area 1,2, and 3 are of such size and shape that housing development would be detrimental to the overall village character and the green areas concerned are local in character and are not extensive tracts of land.

Page 59 of 60 Pytchley Village Neighbourhood Development Plan – Pre-submission

6. Appendices.

6.1. Abbreviations. The following are a list of abbreviations used throughout this document listed alphabetically:

CSS – Core Spatial Strategy KBC – Kettering Borough Council LDP – Local Development Plan NNJCS - North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy NPPF - National Planning Policy Framework

6.2. References.

Localism Act 2011 Parish Plan 2003 Parish Plan 2012 Neighbourhood Plan first consultation report. National Planning Policy Framework 2014 Local Development Plan Site Specific Part 2. North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy July 2016 Community Speed Watch Deed and constitution of village hall Pytchley Conservation Area Appraisal Document (KBC document) Parking Standards annex A of the Government Planning Portal Northamptonshire Countryside Design Guide – CPRE Document

Page 60 of 60