The Origin and Molecular Evolution of Two Multigene Families: G-Protein Coupled Receptors and Glycoside Hydrolase Families

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Origin and Molecular Evolution of Two Multigene Families: G-Protein Coupled Receptors and Glycoside Hydrolase Families University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dissertations and Theses in Biological Sciences Biological Sciences, School of Fall 9-25-2013 THE ORIGIN AND MOLECULAR EVOLUTION OF TWO MULTIGENE FAMILIES: G-PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTORS AND GLYCOSIDE HYDROLASE FAMILIES Seong-il Eyun University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscidiss Part of the Bioinformatics Commons, and the Evolution Commons Eyun, Seong-il, "THE ORIGIN AND MOLECULAR EVOLUTION OF TWO MULTIGENE FAMILIES: G-PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTORS AND GLYCOSIDE HYDROLASE FAMILIES" (2013). Dissertations and Theses in Biological Sciences. 57. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscidiss/57 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Sciences, School of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses in Biological Sciences by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. THE ORIGIN AND MOLECULAR EVOLUTION OF TWO MULTIGENE FAMILIES: G- PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTORS AND GLYCOSIDE HYDROLASE FAMILIES by Seong-il Eyun A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Major: Biological Sciences Under the Supervision of Professor Etsuko Moriyama Lincoln, Nebraska August, 2013 THE ORIGIN AND MOLECULAR EVOLUTION OF TWO MULTIGENE FAMILIES: G- PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTORS AND GLYCOSIDE HYDROLASE FAMILIES Seong-il Eyun, Ph.D. University of Nebraska, 2013 Advisor: Etsuko Moriyama Multigene family is a group of genes that arose from a common ancestor by gene duplication. Gene duplications are a major driving force of new function acquisition. Multigene family thus has a fundamental role in adaptation. To elucidate their molecular evolutionary mechanisms, I chose two multigene families: chemosensory receptors and glycoside hydrolases. I have identified complete repertoires of trace amine-associated receptors (TAARs), a member of chemosensory receptors, from 38 metazoan genomes. An ancestral-type TAAR emerged before the divergence between gnathostomes (jawed vertebrates) and sea lamprey (jawless fish). Primary amine detecting TAARs (TAAR1-4) are found to be older and have evolved under strong functional constraints. In contrast, tertiary amine detectors (TAAR5-9) emerged later, experienced higher rates of gene duplications, and experienced positive selection that could have affected ligand-binding activities and specificities. Expansions of tertiary amine detectors must have played important roles in terrestrial adaptations of therian mammals. During the primate evolution, TAAR gene losses are found to be a major trend. Relaxed selective constraints found in primate lineages of TAARs support dispensability of these primate genes. Reduced predator exposures owing to the start of arboreal life by ancestoral primates may attribute to this change. For another type of multigene family, glycoside hydrolase (GH) genes were identified in the western corn rootworm, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Three GH family genes (GH45, GH48, and GH28) were found only in two coleopteran superfamilies (Chrysomeloidea and Curculionoidea) among insects (except for hemipteran GH28s), indicating their origin from horizontal gene transfer (HGT). Several independent HGTs in fungi and other insects were also detected. Two multigene families in this study are characterized with frequent gene duplications and losses, the birth-and-death process. A high rate of HGTs found in the GH family gene evolution must have accelerated functional evolution. In conclusion, this study showed that birth-and-death process, positive selection, and HGTs, all play a critical role in driving the evolution of multigene families and allow organismal adaptation to novel environmental niches. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I am very grateful to my advisor, Dr. Etsuko Moriyama and the members of Moriyama Lab in which I have interacted. They have provided a continual source of knowledge, guidance, and invaluable assistance in all phases of my doctorial career. I would like to sincere thank my committee members; Dr. Lawrence G. Harshman, Dr. Blair D. Siegfried, Dr. Jay F. Storz, and Dr. Hideaki Moriyama for their expert knowledge and comments. I also thank the financial and professional support from the Biological Sciences program at University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Finally, I want to thank my parents. Thank my wife, Eun Jeong Kim for her continual love, encouragement, and support during the preparation of this dissertation. Thank you my son, Ian Eyun for giving me lovely kisses and hugs. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Title …………………………………………………………………………………….….. i Abstract …………………………………………………………………………………… ii Acknowledgements ……………………………………………………….………..…….. iv Table of Contents ………………………………………………………………………… v List of Tables ……….....………………………………………………………..….…….. xi List of Figures …………………………………………………………………………... xii Abbreviations ..…………………………………………………………………..…........ xiv Chapter 1 Introduction …………………………………………………………………... 1 1.1 Overview of multigene family and objectives ……..……………………………... 1 1.1.1 Gene duplications and multiple family ……..……...……………………... 1 1.1.2 Concerted evolution and the birth-and-death model ………….…………... 3 1.1.3 Horizontal gene transfer ……………………………….…..……………... 4 1.1.4 Objectives of the research …………..………………..….…………..……... 5 1.2 G-protein-coupled receptors superfamily ……....………..…………………………... 6 1.2.1 Classification of GPCRs …………............................……………………... 8 1.2.2 Chemosensory receptors ………………….……………...………………... 9 1.2.3 Chemosensory organs and receptors in vertebrates and insect ……….. 11 1.2.4 Trace amine-associated receptors …………….........………………….. 13 1.2.5 Molecular evolution of CRs …………………......……………………... 16 1.2.6 Origin of GPCRs in the basal metazoan ……......……………………...... 17 vi 1.3 Glycoside hydrolase families ……………………..………………………………... 19 1.3.1 Plant cell walls degradation and cellulase ……………………….………. 19 1.3.2 Endogenous insect cellulolytic enzymes ………..……..…………….…... 21 1.3.3 Classification of glycoside hydrolases and their distribution in metazoans and insects ………………………………………..……..………………….…... 22 1.3.4 Molecular evolution and origin of insect glycoside hydrolase families .... 28 1.4 Organization of the dissertation ……………………...………..…..………………... 29 1.5 Literature cited ………………..…………………………………………….………... 31 Chapter 2 Molecular Evolution and Functional Divergence of Trace Amine– Associated Receptors ……………………………………………..……………………... 53 2.0 Abstract for Chapter 2 ………..…………………………………..…………………... 54 2.1 Background ………………………………………………………………………... 55 2.2 Results and discussion …...…………………………………………...…………... 57 2.2.1 Identification of TAAR genes ………………………….………...……... 57 2.2.2 Synteny of TAAR loci among tetrapod species ……….…….……...…... 58 2.2.3 Origin and early evolution of TAARs ……………...….………………... 58 2.2.4 Evolution of TAAR subfamilies in tetrapods ……......………………... 60 2.2.5 Therian TAAR subfamilies ………………...….………………………... 63 2.2.6 Gain and loss of TAAR genes among mammals ……....………………... 64 2.2.7 Functional differentiation among TAAR subfamilies …………………... 67 vii 2.2.8 Different evolutionary patterns in primary and tertiary detecting TAARs .………….……………………………………………….…………...…….. 68 2.2.9 Positive-selection sites are located in the potential ligand-binding sites in the TAAR proteins ……..………………………………………………... 70 2.2.10 Changes of amino acid properties in positive-selection sites ……………..………………………………………………….…….……... 72 2.3 Conclusion …………………………………………………………………….…... 73 2.4 Material and methods ………………………………………………………………... 74 2.4.1 Query and genome sequences ………….………………………………... 74 2.4.2 TAAR gene mining ………….…………………………………………... 75 2.4.3 TAAR signature motif ……………………………………………………... 76 2.4.4 Multiple sequence alignments ………………….………………………... 77 2.4.5 Phylogenetic analysis …………………………..…………………………... 78 2.4.6 Transmembrane protein topology prediction ……….…..………………... 78 2.4.7 Tests of selection patterns …….…..……………………………………... 79 2.4.8 Analysis of selection on amino acid properties …….…..……………... 80 2.4.9 Protein structural homology modeling …………………………………... 81 2.5 Acknowledgements ……………..………………………………………………..…... 82 2.6 Literature cited ……………………………………….….…………….……………... 83 viii Chapter 3 Pseudogenizations of Trace Amine–Associated Receptor Genes in Primates ......................................................................................................................... 97 3.0 Abstract …………………………………………….……………………..…......…... 98 3.1 Background …………………………………………….………………………..…... 99 3.2 Results and discussion …...……………………………….………...…………..... 100 3.2.1 Identification of TAAR genes in primates …..………….……….....….... 101 3.2.2 Phylogenetic analysis of primate TAARs ……….…….…….……...…... 101 3.2.3 Pseudogenizations of TAARs in primates …………….…………....….. 102 3.2.4 Dispensability of primate TAARs …………………......……..………... 105 3.2.5 Selection patterns among TAAR subfamilies ….………..……..……... 106 3.2.6 Different selective forces operating on TAAR subfamilies ……....…... 107 3.2.7 Positive-selection sites located in the potential ligand-binding sites ….. 108 3.3 Conclusion ……………………………………………………………..…….…... 110 3.4 Material and methods ……………………………………………………..……... 110 3.4.1 Genome sequences and TAAR gene mining …………………………... 111 3.4.2 Multiple sequence alignments and phylogenetic analysis ……………..
Recommended publications
  • Downloaded for Further Analysis
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.10.288951; this version posted September 11, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Coordination of two enhancers drives expression of olfactory trace amine- associated receptors Aimei Fei1,8, Wanqing Wu1,8, Longzhi Tan3,8, Cheng Tang4,8, Zhengrong Xu1, Xiaona Huo4, Hongqiang Bao1, Mark Johnson5, Griffin Hartmann5, Mustafa Talay5, Cheng Yang1, Clemens Riegler6, Kristian Joseph6, Florian Engert6, X. Sunney Xie3, Gilad Barnea5, Stephen D. Liberles7, Hui Yang4, and Qian Li1,2,* 1Center for Brain Science, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China; 2Shanghai Research Center for Brain Science and Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Shanghai 201210, China; 3Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; 4Institute of Neuroscience, State Key Laboratory of Neuroscience, Key Laboratory of Primate Neurobiology, CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Shanghai Research Center for Brain Science and Brian-Inspired Intelligence, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China; 5Department of Neuroscience, Division of Biology and Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA; 6Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; 7Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; 8These authors contributed equally to this work. *Correspondence to [email protected], phone: +86-21-63846590 ext. 776985 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.10.288951; this version posted September 11, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Evidence for a Central Epinephrine-Innervated A1- Adrenergic System That Regulates Behavioral Activation and Is Impaired in Depression
    Neuropsychopharmacology (2003) 28, 1387–1399 & 2003 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0893-133X/03 $25.00 www.neuropsychopharmacology.org Perspective Emerging Evidence for a Central Epinephrine-Innervated a1- Adrenergic System that Regulates Behavioral Activation and is Impaired in Depression ,1 1 1 1 1 Eric A Stone* , Yan Lin , Helen Rosengarten , H Kenneth Kramer and David Quartermain 1Departments of Psychiatry and Neurology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA Currently, most basic and clinical research on depression is focused on either central serotonergic, noradrenergic, or dopaminergic neurotransmission as affected by various etiological and predisposing factors. Recent evidence suggests that there is another system that consists of a subset of brain a1B-adrenoceptors innervated primarily by brain epinephrine (EPI) that potentially modulates the above three monoamine systems in parallel and plays a critical role in depression. The present review covers the evidence for this system and includes findings that brain a -adrenoceptors are instrumental in behavioral activation, are located near the major monoamine cell groups 1 or target areas, receive EPI as their neurotransmitter, are impaired or inhibited in depressed patients or after stress in animal models, and a are restored by a number of antidepressants. This ‘EPI- 1 system’ may therefore represent a new target system for this disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology (2003) 28, 1387–1399, advance online publication, 18 June 2003; doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300222 Keywords: a1-adrenoceptors; epinephrine; motor activity; depression; inactivity INTRODUCTION monoaminergic systems. This new system appears to be impaired during stress and depression and thus may Depressive illness is currently believed to result from represent a new target for this disorder.
    [Show full text]
  • Jenna K. Caines, Sherri L. Christian, Mark D. Berry Department of Biochemistry, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John'
    Trace Amine-Associated Receptors in Monocytes: A Constant Low-Level Expression Jenna K. Caines, Sherri L. Christian, Mark D. Berry Department of Biochemistry, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s NL Trace amine-associated receptors (TAARs) Is TAAR1 differentially expressed in response to Pro- and Are any TAARs differentially expressed between § G protein-coupled receptors anti-inflammatory stimuli? monocyte and macrophage lineages? § Established throughout the body in vertebrates Table 1: Datasets with n ≥ 3 examining human and mice macrophages Table 2: Datasets with n ≥ 3 containing several monocyte and § Humans have 6 functional isoforms: TAAR1, TAAR2, TAAR5, TAAR6, TAAR8, and TAAR9 treated with pro- and anti-inflammatory stimuli macrophage lineages from mice TAARs and the immune system Dataset Treatment Time TAAR1 p-value Dataset Cell type Number of lineages Treatment § Found in leukocyte populations1 GSE53986 Untreated (control) 0h examined INFγ 24h 0.8 GSE15907 Lung Macrophage 2 NA 1 § TAAR1 suspected of regulating immune response GSE60290 Untreated (control) 0h Peritoneal Macrophage 6 NA § Potential target for pharmacological treatment of immune disorders2 INFγ 18h 0.3 Spleen Macrophage NA GSE43075 Untreated (control) 0h Blood Monocyte 2 NA Hypothesis LPS 4h 0.45 Mesenteric LN monocyte 1 NA GSE121646 Untreated (control) 0h Oral Salmonella § TAAR1 will show differential expression upon activation and LPS 8h 0.7 Small intestine macrophage 2 Typhimurium(72 h) GSE19315 Untreated (control) 0h between leukocyte populations
    [Show full text]
  • Β2‑Adrenergic Receptor Functionality and Genotype in Two Different Models of Chronic Inflammatory Disease: Liver Cirrhosis and Osteoarthritis
    MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS 17: 7987-7995, 2018 β2‑adrenergic receptor functionality and genotype in two different models of chronic inflammatory disease: Liver cirrhosis and osteoarthritis REYES ROCA1, PABLO ESTEBAN1, PEDRO ZAPATER2,3, MARÍA-DEL-MAR INDA4, ANNA LUCIA CONTE1, LAURA GÓMEZ-ESCOLAR5, HELENA MARTÍNEZ6, JOSÉ F. HORGA3, JOSÉ M. PALAZON5 and ANA M. PEIRÓ3,4 1Occupational Observatory, Miguel Hernández University (UMH) of Elche, 03202 Elche; 2CIBERehd, Carlos III Health Institute, 28029 Madrid; 3Clinical Pharmacology, General Hospital of Alicante; 4Neuropharmacology on Pain (NED) Research Group, ISABIAL-FISABIO, General Hospital of Alicante; 5Liver Unit, General Hospital of Alicante, 03010 Alicante; 6Clinical R&D Area, Bioiberica S.A., 08029 Barcelona, Spain Received June 12, 2017; Accepted September 28, 2017 DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2018.8820 Abstract. The present study was designed to investigate the Introduction functional status of β2 adrenoceptors (β2AR) in two models of chronic inflammatory disease: Liver cirrhosis (LC) and The role of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) in inflam- osteoarthritis (OA). The β2AR gene contains three single mation is still not completely understood, although it is well nucleotide polymorphisms at amino acid positions 16, 27 and known that disturbed interaction between both contributes to 164. The aim of the present study was to investigate the poten- pathogenic chronic inflammatory diseases (1,2). Evidence for tial influence of lymphocyte β2AR receptor functionality and the possibility of such interaction have been reinforced since genotype in LC and OA patients. Blood samples from cirrhotic the discovery of the expression of beta-2-adrenergic receptor patients (n=52, hepatic venous pressure gradient 13±4 mmHg, (β2AR) on T and B lymphocytes, macrophages, natural killer CHILD 7±2 and MELD 11±4 scores), OA patients (n=30, 84% cells and neutrophils (3-6).
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery of Novel Imidazolines and Imidazoles As Selective TAAR1
    Discovery of Novel Imidazolines and Imidazoles as Selective TAAR1 Partial Agonists for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders Giuseppe Cecere, pRED, Discovery Chemistry F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland Biological Rationale Trace amines are known for four decades Trace Amines - phenylethylamine p- tyramine p- octopamine tryptamine (PEA) Biogenic Amines dopamine norepinephrine serotonin ( DA) (NE) (5-HT) • Structurally related to classical biogenic amine neurotransmitters (DA, NE, 5-HT) • Co-localised & released with biogenic amines in same cells and vesicles • Low concentrations in CNS, rapidly catabolized by monoamine oxidase (MAO) • Dysregulation linked to psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia & 2 depression Trace Amines Metabolism 3 Biological Rationale Trace Amine-Associated Receptors (TAARs) p-Tyramine extracellular TAAR1 Discrete family of GPCR’s Subtypes TAAR1-TAAR9 known intracellular Gs Structural similarity with the rhodopsin and adrenergic receptor superfamily adenylate Activation of the TAAR1 cyclase receptor leads to cAMP elevation of intracellular cAMP levels • First discovered in 2001 (Borowsky & Bunzow); characterised and classified at Roche in 2004 • Trace amines are endogenous ligands of TAAR1 • TAAR1 is expressed throughout the limbic and monoaminergic system in the brain Borowsky, B. et al., PNAS 2001, 98, 8966; Bunzow, J. R. et al., Mol. Pharmacol. 2001, 60, 1181. Lindemann L, Hoener MC, Trends Pharmacol Sci 2005, 26, 274. 4 Biological Rationale Electrical activity of dopaminergic neurons + p-tyramine
    [Show full text]
  • G Protein-Coupled Receptors: What a Difference a ‘Partner’ Makes
    Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 1112-1142; doi:10.3390/ijms15011112 OPEN ACCESS International Journal of Molecular Sciences ISSN 1422-0067 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms Review G Protein-Coupled Receptors: What a Difference a ‘Partner’ Makes Benoît T. Roux 1 and Graeme S. Cottrell 2,* 1 Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Reading School of Pharmacy, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6UB, UK * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-118-378-7027; Fax: +44-118-378-4703. Received: 4 December 2013; in revised form: 20 December 2013 / Accepted: 8 January 2014 / Published: 16 January 2014 Abstract: G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are important cell signaling mediators, involved in essential physiological processes. GPCRs respond to a wide variety of ligands from light to large macromolecules, including hormones and small peptides. Unfortunately, mutations and dysregulation of GPCRs that induce a loss of function or alter expression can lead to disorders that are sometimes lethal. Therefore, the expression, trafficking, signaling and desensitization of GPCRs must be tightly regulated by different cellular systems to prevent disease. Although there is substantial knowledge regarding the mechanisms that regulate the desensitization and down-regulation of GPCRs, less is known about the mechanisms that regulate the trafficking and cell-surface expression of newly synthesized GPCRs. More recently, there is accumulating evidence that suggests certain GPCRs are able to interact with specific proteins that can completely change their fate and function. These interactions add on another level of regulation and flexibility between different tissue/cell-types.
    [Show full text]
  • Olfactory Expression of Trace Amine-Associated Receptors
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23824-3 OPEN Olfactory expression of trace amine-associated receptors requires cooperative cis-acting enhancers ✉ Ami Shah1,5, Madison Ratkowski1,5, Alessandro Rosa 2,3, Paul Feinstein2,3 & Thomas Bozza 1,4 Olfactory sensory neurons express a large family of odorant receptors (ORs) and a small family of trace amine-associated receptors (TAARs). While both families are subject to so- called singular expression (expression of one allele of one gene), the mechanisms underlying fi 1234567890():,; TAAR gene choice remain obscure. Here, we report the identi cation of two conserved sequence elements in the mouse TAAR cluster (T-elements) that are required for TAAR gene expression. We observed that cell-type-specific expression of a TAAR-derived transgene required either T-element. Moreover, deleting either element reduced or abolished expres- sion of a subset of TAAR genes, while deleting both elements abolished olfactory expression of all TAARs in cis with the mutation. The T-elements exhibit several features of known OR enhancers but also contain highly conserved, unique sequence motifs. Our data demonstrate that TAAR gene expression requires two cooperative cis-acting enhancers and suggest that ORs and TAARs share similar mechanisms of singular expression. 1 Department of Neurobiology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA. 2 The Graduate Center Programs in Biochemistry, Biology and CUNY Neuroscience Collaborative, New York, NY, USA. 3 Department of Biological Sciences, Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA. 4 Chemistry of Life Processes Institute, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA. 5These authors contributed equally: Ami Shah, Madison Ratkowski.
    [Show full text]
  • File Download
    Anatomical and functional evidence for trace amines as unique modulators of locomotor function in the mammalian spinal cord Elizabeth A. Gozal, Emory University Brannan E. O'Neill, Emory University Michael A. Sawchuk, Emory University Hong Zhu, Emory University Mallika Halder, Emory University Chou Ching-Chieh , Emory University Shawn Hochman, Emory University Journal Title: Frontiers in Neural Circuits Volume: Volume 8 Publisher: Frontiers | 2014-11-07, Pages 134-134 Type of Work: Article | Final Publisher PDF Publisher DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2014.00134 Permanent URL: https://pid.emory.edu/ark:/25593/mr95r Final published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2014.00134 Copyright information: © 2014 Gozal, O'Neill, Sawchuk, Zhu, Halder, Chou and Hochman. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits distribution of derivative works, making multiple copies, distribution, public display, and publicly performance, provided the original work is properly cited. This license requires credit be given to copyright holder and/or author, copyright and license notices be kept intact. Accessed September 27, 2021 11:18 AM EDT ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE published: 07 November 2014 NEURAL CIRCUITS doi: 10.3389/fncir.2014.00134 Anatomical and functional evidence for trace amines as unique modulators of locomotor function in the mammalian spinal cord Elizabeth A. Gozal , Brannan E. O’Neill , Michael A. Sawchuk , Hong Zhu , Mallika Halder , Ching-Chieh Chou and Shawn Hochman* Physiology Department, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA Edited by: The trace amines (TAs), tryptamine, tyramine, and β-phenylethylamine, are synthesized Brian R.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of a Subset of Trace Amine-Associated Receptors and Ligands As Potential Modulators of Insulin Secretion
    Journal Pre-proofs Identification of a subset of trace amine-associated receptors and ligands as po- tential modulators of insulin secretion Michael J. Cripps, Marta Bagnati, Tania A. Jones, Babatunji W. Ogunkolade, Sophie R. Sayers, Paul W. Caton, Katie Hanna, Merell Billacura, Kathryn Fair, Carl Nelson, Robert Lowe, Graham A. Hitman, Mark D. Berry, Mark D. Turner PII: S0006-2952(19)30384-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2019.113685 Reference: BCP 113685 To appear in: Biochemical Pharmacology Received Date: 22 August 2019 Accepted Date: 24 October 2019 Please cite this article as: M.J. Cripps, M. Bagnati, T.A. Jones, B.W. Ogunkolade, S.R. Sayers, P.W. Caton, K. Hanna, M. Billacura, K. Fair, C. Nelson, R. Lowe, G.A. Hitman, M.D. Berry, M.D. Turner, Identification of a subset of trace amine-associated receptors and ligands as potential modulators of insulin secretion, Biochemical Pharmacology (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2019.113685 This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Olfactory Genes in the Expression of Rodent Paternal Care Behavior
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Review The Role of Olfactory Genes in the Expression of Rodent Paternal Care Behavior Tasmin L. Rymer 1,2,3 1 College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, P. O. Box 6811, Cairns, QLD 4870, Australia; [email protected]; Tel.: +61-7-4232-1629 2 Centre for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Sciences, James Cook University, P. O. Box 6811, Cairns, QLD 4870, Australia 3 School of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, WITS, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa Received: 30 January 2020; Accepted: 5 March 2020; Published: 10 March 2020 Abstract: Olfaction is the dominant sensory modality in rodents, and is crucial for regulating social behaviors, including parental care. Paternal care is rare in rodents, but can have significant consequences for offspring fitness, suggesting a need to understand the factors that regulate its expression. Pup-related odor cues are critical for the onset and maintenance of paternal care. Here, I consider the role of olfaction in the expression of paternal care in rodents. The medial preoptic area shares neural projections with the olfactory and accessory olfactory bulbs, which are responsible for the interpretation of olfactory cues detected by the main olfactory and vomeronasal systems. The olfactory, trace amine, membrane-spanning 4-pass A, vomeronasal 1, vomeronasal 2 and formyl peptide receptors are all involved in olfactory detection. I highlight the roles that 10 olfactory genes play in the expression of direct paternal care behaviors, acknowledging that this list is not exhaustive.
    [Show full text]
  • G Protein-Coupled Receptors
    S.P.H. Alexander et al. The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16: G protein-coupled receptors. British Journal of Pharmacology (2015) 172, 5744–5869 THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16: G protein-coupled receptors Stephen PH Alexander1, Anthony P Davenport2, Eamonn Kelly3, Neil Marrion3, John A Peters4, Helen E Benson5, Elena Faccenda5, Adam J Pawson5, Joanna L Sharman5, Christopher Southan5, Jamie A Davies5 and CGTP Collaborators 1School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK, 2Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK, 3School of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK, 4Neuroscience Division, Medical Education Institute, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK, 5Centre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK Abstract The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16 provides concise overviews of the key properties of over 1750 human drug targets with their pharmacology, plus links to an open access knowledgebase of drug targets and their ligands (www.guidetopharmacology.org), which provides more detailed views of target and ligand properties. The full contents can be found at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ 10.1111/bph.13348/full. G protein-coupled receptors are one of the eight major pharmacological targets into which the Guide is divided, with the others being: ligand-gated ion channels, voltage-gated ion channels, other ion channels, nuclear hormone receptors, catalytic receptors, enzymes and transporters. These are presented with nomenclature guidance and summary information on the best available pharmacological tools, alongside key references and suggestions for further reading.
    [Show full text]
  • G Protein‐Coupled Receptors
    S.P.H. Alexander et al. The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20: G protein-coupled receptors. British Journal of Pharmacology (2019) 176, S21–S141 THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20: G protein-coupled receptors Stephen PH Alexander1 , Arthur Christopoulos2 , Anthony P Davenport3 , Eamonn Kelly4, Alistair Mathie5 , John A Peters6 , Emma L Veale5 ,JaneFArmstrong7 , Elena Faccenda7 ,SimonDHarding7 ,AdamJPawson7 , Joanna L Sharman7 , Christopher Southan7 , Jamie A Davies7 and CGTP Collaborators 1School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK 2Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Department of Pharmacology, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia 3Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK 4School of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK 5Medway School of Pharmacy, The Universities of Greenwich and Kent at Medway, Anson Building, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Chatham, Kent, ME4 4TB, UK 6Neuroscience Division, Medical Education Institute, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK 7Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK Abstract The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20 is the fourth in this series of biennial publications. The Concise Guide provides concise overviews of the key properties of nearly 1800 human drug targets with an emphasis on selective pharmacology (where available), plus links to the open access knowledgebase source of drug targets and their ligands (www.guidetopharmacology.org), which provides more detailed views of target and ligand properties. Although the Concise Guide represents approximately 400 pages, the material presented is substantially reduced compared to information and links presented on the website.
    [Show full text]