ISSN 1759-1201 www.brucknerjournal.co.uk Issued three times a year and sold by subscription FOUNDING EDITOR: Peter Palmer (1997-2004) Editor : Ken Ward
[email protected] 23 Mornington Grove, London E3 4NS Subscriptions and Mailing: Raymond Cox
[email protected] 4 Lulworth Close, Halesowen, B63 2UJ 01384 566383 VOLUME FIFTEEN, NUMBER TWO, JULY 2011 Associate Editors: Crawford Howie, Nicholas Attfield In this issue The Unknown Bruckner Readers’ Conference report This issue, following a very successful Bruckner Journal Readers’ by Alan Freestone Page 2 Conference at Hertford College, Oxford, in April, continues to focus in part on the Fifth Symphony. Raymond Cox notes that the Concert reviews Page 4 Fifth is being talked of and played more often than has previously Book review “The New Bruckner” been the case, and that perhaps it is a symphony especially suited by Dermot Gault reviewed by to our times. The Sixth has often been referred to as the Cinderella Dr. Crawford Howie Page 10 of the symphonies, but it now receives fairly frequent performances. And there are even occasional performances of the Book review: “Out of Time” by First and Second to be heard. The choral works fare less well, only Tanya Tintner , reviewed by Ken Ward Page 14 the Te Deum, a few of the motets and the Mass No. 2 being performed at all frequently. But when we consider the large Changing Times for Bruckner’s Fifth number of smaller vocal works, for solo voice, mixed choir and by Raymond Cox Page 18 male voice choir that Bruckner wrote, they are in most cases not to Counterpoint and Form in the Finale be heard at all in live performance, and in many cases not even of Bruckner’s Fifth Symphony available as a recorded performance.