DOCSLIB.ORG

Incubator Building Alconbury Weald Cambridgeshire Post-Excavation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Incubator Building Alconbury Weald Cambridgeshire Post-Excavation Incubator Building Alconbury Weald Cambridgeshire Post-Excavation Assessment for Buro Four on behalf of Urban & Civic CA Project: 669006 CA Report: 13385 CHER Number: 3861 June 2013 Incubator Building Alconbury Weald Cambridgeshire Post-Excavation Assessment CA Project: 669006 CA Report: 13385 CHER Number: 3861 Authors: Jeremy Mordue, Supervisor Jonathan Hart, Publications Officer Approved: Martin Watts, Head of Publications Signed: ……………………………………………………………. Issue: 01 Date: 25 June 2013 This report is confidential to the client. Cotswold Archaeology accepts no responsibility or liability to any third party to whom this report, or any part of it, is made known. Any such party relies upon this report entirely at their own risk. No part of this report may be reproduced by any means without permission. © Cotswold Archaeology Unit 4, Cromwell Business Centre, Howard Way, Newport Pagnell, Milton Keynes, MK16 9QS t. 01908 218320 e. [email protected] 1 Incubator Building, Alconbury Weald, Cambridgeshire: Post-Excavation Assessment © Cotswold Archaeology CONTENTS SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 4 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 5 2 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES ................................................................................... 6 3 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................... 6 4 RESULTS .......................................................................................................... 7 5 FACTUAL DATA AND STATEMENTS OF POTENTIAL ..................................... 10 6 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF POTENTIAL ........................................................ 15 7 STORAGE AND CURATION .............................................................................. 16 8 UPDATED AIMS AND OBJECTIVES ................................................................. 16 9 PUBLICATION ................................................................................................... 18 10 TASK LIST ......................................................................................................... 18 11 REFERENCES ................................................................................................... 20 APPENDIX 1: THE POTTERY BY E.R. MCSLOY ........................................................... 25 APPENDIX 2: FIRED CLAY AND DAUB BY E.R. MCSLOY ........................................... 27 APPENDIX 3: WORKED BONE AND ANTLER BY E.R. MCSLOY ................................. 27 APPENDIX 4: METALWORK BY E.R. MCSLOY ............................................................. 28 APPENDIX 5: LITHICS BY A. CRAWFORD AND E.R. MCSLOY ................................... 29 APPENDIX 6: GLASS BY E.R. MCSLOY ........................................................................ 29 APPENDIX 7: CERAMIC BUILDING MATERIAL (CBM) BY A. CRAWFORD AND E.R. MCSLOY ............................................................................................................ 29 APPENDIX 8: ANIMAL BONE BY JONNY GEBER ......................................................... 30 2 Incubator Building, Alconbury Weald, Cambridgeshire: Post-Excavation Assessment © Cotswold Archaeology APPENDIX 9: PLANT MACROFOSSIL AND CHARCOAL REMAINS BY SARAH COBAIN ........................................................................................................................... 33 APPENDIX 10: OASIS REPORT FORM ......................................................................... 42 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Fig. 1 Site location plan (1:25,000) Fig. 2 Site location plan, showing archaeological features (1:500) Fig. 3 Plan of the Iron Age features (1:250) Fig. 4 Plan of the Roman features (1:250) Fig. 5 Plan of the medieval, post-medieval and modern features (1:250) Fig. 6 Photograph: pre-excavation view of the site, looking north Fig. 7 Photograph: Iron Age ring-ditch 450, looking south-east Fig. 8 Photograph: Iron Age boundary ditch 358, cut by Roman boundary ditch terminal 472, looking east Fig. 9 Photograph: Iron Age cobbled surface 301, cut by Romano ditch 151, looking south-west Fig. 10 Photograph: Roman boundary ditch 472, partially excavated, looking south-west Fig. 11 Photograph: Iron Age antler object (possible toggle) Fig. 12 Photograph: Middle Bronze Age side-looped bronze spearhead fragment 3 Incubator Building, Alconbury Weald, Cambridgeshire: Post-Excavation Assessment © Cotswold Archaeology SUMMARY Site Name: Incubator Building, Alconbury Weald Location: Cambridgeshire NGR: TL 1985 7655 Type: Excavation Date: February 2013 Location of archive: To be deposited with Cambridgeshire County Archaeological Store Site Code: STUALZ13A CHER Number: 3861 An archaeological excavation was undertaken by Cotswold Archaeology in February 2013 at the request of Buro Four (on behalf of Urban & Civic) at the Incubator Building, Alconbury Weald, Cambridgeshire. An area of 0.22ha was excavated. Features dating to the Middle to Late Iron Age and Roman periods, up to the early 3rd century AD, were identified, along with evidence of medieval and post-medieval agricultural activity and a small number of modern remains. For the earlier periods, evidence for settlement in the form of at least one roundhouse and a finds assemblage typical of rural occupation was found. The survival of the features was good, probably due to their preservation from ploughing resulting from their location within an airfield. The full extents of the Iron Age and Roman sites were not revealed, but enough evidence was recovered to indicate both that the site seems to have been occupied continuously during these periods and that it was abandoned in the early 3rd century AD. This document presents a quantification and assessment of the evidence recovered from the excavation, and identifies its potential for further analysis and publication. 4 Incubator Building, Alconbury Weald, Cambridgeshire: Post-Excavation Assessment © Cotswold Archaeology 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 During February 2013 Cotswold Archaeology (CA) carried out an archaeological excavation of the footprint of the Incubator Building and adjacent roadway, Alconbury Weald, Cambridgeshire, (centred on NGR: TL 1985 7655; Fig. 1). The work was undertaken at the request of Buro Four on behalf of Urban & Civic. CgMs Consulting provided archaeological consultancy advice to Buro Four throughout the duration of the project which was undertaken to meet the requirements of an archaeological condition attached to planning permission for Enabling Works for the Alconbury Enterprise Zone (1102094FUL; Condition 8). 1.2 The archaeological work was undertaken with the approval of the Historic Environment Team, Cambridgeshire County Council (HETCCC) on behalf of Huntingdonshire District Council. The fieldwork followed best practice as set out in the Standard and Guidance for Archaeological Excavation issued by the Institute for Archaeologists (2008), Standards for Field Archaeology in the East of England (Gurney 2003), Management of Archaeological Projects II (EH 1991) and Management of Research Projects in the Historic Environment. The MoRPHE Project Managers’ Guide (EH 2006). The fieldwork was monitored by Andy Thomas (HETCCC). Location, topography and geology 1.3 The excavation area, hereafter referred to as ‘the site’, comprised the footprint of the Incubator Building and part of an adjacent new roadway, a broadly rectangular area of 0.22ha within the Alconbury Enterprise Zone (Figs 1 and 2). The site was formerly part of Alconbury Airfield and was partly occupied by a horseshoe-shaped blast mound surrounding a concrete airfield building which lay to the immediate west of the site. The building and mound had been removed prior to the excavation, immediately prior to which the site was under turf. 1.4 The site and its environs are essentially flat at 49m AOD, and lie on Oxford Clay overlain by superficial deposits of Boulder Clay (BGS 2013). Archaeological background 1.5 Alconbury Airfield has been subject to a series of archaeological investigations over the last 15 years. These have included archaeological desk-based assessments (ULAS 1998; CgMs 2011a), an assessment of the airfield and its historic buildings (CgMs 2011b), geophysical surveys (GSB 2000; ASUD 2006), 5 Incubator Building, Alconbury Weald, Cambridgeshire: Post-Excavation Assessment © Cotswold Archaeology an aerial photographic assessment (APS 1998) and trial trench evaluations (CCCAFU 2001; OAE 2012). 1.6 These investigations showed the site to lie within an area of archaeological potential. A Roman building and associated remains were found near Hermitage Wood, 0.6km north of the site, and a Roman coffin and quern stone were found at Alconbury House, 200m to its south. Ermine Street, the Roman road from Durovigutum (Godmanchester) and Durobrivae (Water Newton), follows the line of the A1, B1043 and B1090 and thus ran close to the south-west of the site. 1.7 Evidence for Anglo-Saxon activity in the vicinity is sparse. A former medieval moated manor was located near Hermitage Wood but, until the development of the airfield in the 1930/40s, the site was largely in agricultural use and the aerial photographic assessment identified ridge and furrow remains within it (APS 1998). 1.8 The 2012 trial trench evaluation included trenches within and around the footprint of the Incubator Building (trenches 3–7). Trenches 6 and 7 contained
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Transport System of Medieval England and Wales
    THE TRANSPORT SYSTEM OF MEDIEVAL ENGLAND AND WALES - A GEOGRAPHICAL SYNTHESIS by James Frederick Edwards M.Sc., Dip.Eng.,C.Eng.,M.I.Mech.E., LRCATS A Thesis presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Salford Department of Geography 1987 1. CONTENTS Page, List of Tables iv List of Figures A Note on References Acknowledgements ix Abstract xi PART ONE INTRODUCTION 1 Chapter One: Setting Out 2 Chapter Two: Previous Research 11 PART TWO THE MEDIEVAL ROAD NETWORK 28 Introduction 29 Chapter Three: Cartographic Evidence 31 Chapter Four: The Evidence of Royal Itineraries 47 Chapter Five: Premonstratensian Itineraries from 62 Titchfield Abbey Chapter Six: The Significance of the Titchfield 74 Abbey Itineraries Chapter Seven: Some Further Evidence 89 Chapter Eight: The Basic Medieval Road Network 99 Conclusions 11? Page PART THREE THr NAVIGABLE MEDIEVAL WATERWAYS 115 Introduction 116 Chapter Hine: The Rivers of Horth-Fastern England 122 Chapter Ten: The Rivers of Yorkshire 142 Chapter Eleven: The Trent and the other Rivers of 180 Central Eastern England Chapter Twelve: The Rivers of the Fens 212 Chapter Thirteen: The Rivers of the Coast of East Anglia 238 Chapter Fourteen: The River Thames and Its Tributaries 265 Chapter Fifteen: The Rivers of the South Coast of England 298 Chapter Sixteen: The Rivers of South-Western England 315 Chapter Seventeen: The River Severn and Its Tributaries 330 Chapter Eighteen: The Rivers of Wales 348 Chapter Nineteen: The Rivers of North-Western England 362 Chapter Twenty: The Navigable Rivers of
    [Show full text]
  • River Nene Waterspace Study
    River Nene Waterspace Study Northampton to Peterborough RICHARD GLEN RGA ASSOCIATES November 2016 ‘All rights reserved. Copyright Richard Glen Associates 2016’ Richard Glen Associates have prepared this report in accordance with the instructions of their clients, Environment Agency & the Nenescape Landscape Partnership, for their sole DQGVSHFL¿FXVH$Q\RWKHUSHUVRQVZKRXVHDQ\LQIRUPDWLRQFRQWDLQHGKHUHLQGRVRDW their own risk. River Nene Waterspace Study River Nene Waterspace Study Northampton to Peterborough On behalf of November 2016 Prepared by RICHARD GLEN RGA ASSOCIATES River Nene Waterspace Study Contents 1.0 Introduction 3.0 Strategic Context 1.1 Partners to the Study 1 3.1 Local Planning 7 3.7 Vision for Biodiversity in the Nene Valley, The Wildlife Trusts 2006 11 1.2 Aims of the Waterspace Study 1 3.1.1 North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy 2011-2031 7 3.8 River Nene Integrated Catchment 1.3 Key Objectives of the Study 1 3.1.2 West Northamptonshire Management Plan. June 2014 12 1.4 Study Area 1 Joint Core Strategy 8 3.9 The Nene Valley Strategic Plan. 1.5 Methodology 2 3.1.3 Peterborough City Council Local Plan River Nene Regional Park, 2010 13 1.6 Background Research & Site Survey 2 Preliminary Draft January 2016 9 3.10 Destination Nene Valley Strategy, 2013 14 1.7 Consultation with River Users, 3.2 Peterborough Long Term Transport 3.11 A Better Place for All: River Nene Waterway Providers & Local Communities 2 Strategy 2011 - 2026 & Plan, Environment Agency 2006 14 Local Transport Plan 2016 - 2021 9 1.8 Report 2 3.12 Peterborough
    [Show full text]
  • Iron Production in Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire in Antiquity by Frances Condron
    Iron Production in Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire in Antiquity by Frances Condron Iron production in Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire during the Roman period is well attested, though to date the region has not been considered one of importance. This paper outlines the range of settlements involved in smelting and smithing, and suggests models for the organisation of production and development through time. It is suggested that surplus iron was being made and transported outside the region, possibly to the northern garrisons, following the archaeologically documented movement of lower Nene Valley wares. A gazetteer of smelting and smithing sites is provided. Iron production in Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire during the Roman period is well attested, though to date the region has not been considered one of importance. Two iron-working regions of note have been revealed, on the Weald of Kent (Cleere 1974; Cleere & Crossley 1985), and in the Forest of Dean (Fulford & Allen 1992). In the East Midlands, the range of settlements involved and duration of production indicate a long and complex history of iron working, in some cases showing continuity from late Iron Age practices. However, there were clearly developments both in the nature and scale of production, at the top end of the scale indicative of planned operations. This paper explores the organisation of this production within sites and across the region, and outlines possible trade networks. The transition from Iron Age to Roman saw the introduction of new iron working technology (the shaft furnace in particular), and of equal significance, a shift in the organisation of production.
    [Show full text]
  • A Beautifully Presented Grade Ii Listed Property, Forming the Largest Portion of a Stone Water Mill of 1770, Which Was Converte
    A BEAUTIFULLY PRESENTED GRADE II LISTED PROPERTY, FORMING THE LARGEST PORTION OF A STONE WATER MILL OF 1770, WHICH WAS CONVERTED IN 1991 INTO FOUR PROPERTIES, SITUATED IN AN ATTRACTIVE SETTING ON THE BANKS OF THE RIVER NENE the mill, mill lane, water newton, peterborough, cambridgeshire, pe8 6ly A BEAUTIFULLY PRESENTED GRADE II LISTED PROPERTY, FORMING THE LARGEST PORTION OF A STONE WATER MILL OF 1770, WHICH WAS CONVERTED IN 1991 INTO FOUR PROPERTIES, SITUATED IN AN ATTRACTIVE SETTING ON THE BANKS OF THE RIVER NENE the mill, mill lane, water newton, peterborough, cambridgeshire, pe8 6ly Dining kitchen w Sitting room w Principal bedroom w Guest ensuite bedroom w Two further bedrooms w Family bathroom w Driveway & parking w Garage w Landscaped private garden w Riverside setting Mileage Peterborough 7.5 miles (Trains to Cambridge & London Kings Cross from 51 minutes) w Oundle 10 miles w Stamford 14 miles w Huntingdon 18 miles Situation The attractive Conservation Village of Water Newton has a collection of largely stone houses and lies close to the River Nene to the west of Peterborough. The village is bypassed by the A1 and is approximately 2 miles north of Alwalton village, which has a pub, post office and village shop. A footbridge over the River Nene, close to The Mill, and public footpath provides an attractive rural walk through fields to the villages of Ailsworth and Castor with their public house restaurants, village shop and facilities. The Georgian market towns of Oundle and Stamford, and the Cathedral City of Peterborough, provide a good range of shopping, services and leisure facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Huntingdonshire's Local Plan to 2036: Targeted Consultation 2015
    P R E P / 0 4 Huntingdonshire's Local Planto 2036: Targeted Consultation 2015 Huntingdonshire Local Plan| Huntingdonshire's Local Planto 2036: Targeted Consultation 2015 1 Document Information Huntingdonshire Local Plan | Huntingdonshire's Local Plan to 2036: Targeted Consultation 2015 Document Information This version was produced on 21st January 2015 The main changes/ reasons for publishing this version are: Finalised version for targeted consultation Further copies of this document can be obtained from: The Council's website - www.huntingdonshire.gov.uk Planning Services, Huntingdonshire District Council, Pathfinder House, St.Mary's Street, Huntingdon, PE29 3TN. Telephone: 01480 388388 e-mail: [email protected] Maps All maps are reproduced from the Ordnance Survey Mapping with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Ordnance Survey HDC 100022322. Links to Websites The Local Plan includes a range of links to websites providing supporting information, data or guidance. Every effort has been made to ensure that these links are up to date. As websites change these links can become invalid. In circumstances where links have become invalid please use a suitable search term for an internet search. A list of known issues with links detailing alternative links or workarounds will be maintained on the Council's website. Alternatively please contact the Local Plans team at the email address above for guidance. Cross reference links Cross references have been included in the text. Where these are underlined they provide a clickable internal link to the reference in electronic versions (pdf and web).
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of the Dark Ages in Search of the Dark Ages
    IN SEARCH OF THE DARK AGES IN SEARCH OF THE DARK AGES Michael Wood Facts On File Publications New York, New York Oxford, England For my mother and father IN SEARCH OF THE DARK AGES Copyright © 1987 by Michael Wood All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the pub­ lisher. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Wood, Michael. In search of the Dark Ages. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Great Britain—History—To 1066. 2. England— Civilization—To 1066. 3. Anglo-Saxons. I. Title. DA135.W83 1987 942.01 86-19839 ISBN 0-8160-1686-0 Printed in the United States of America 10 987654321 CONTENTS Acknowledgements 6 Introduction 7 Genealogy Table 10 CHAPTER 1 13 Boadicea CHAPTER 2 37 King Arthur CHAPTER 3 61 The Sutton Hoo Man CHAPTER 4 77 Offa CHAPTER 5 104 Alfred the Great CHAPTER 6 126 Atheistan CHAPTER 7 151 Eric Bloodaxe CHAPTER 8 177 Ethelred the Unready CHAPTER 9 204 William the Conqueror Postscript 237 Book List 243 Picture Credits 244 Index 245 Acknowledgements I must first thank the staffs of the following libraries for their kindness and helpfulness, without which this book would not have been possible: Corpus Christi College Cambridge, Jesus College Oxford, the Bodleian Library Oxford, the Cathedral Library Durham, the British Library, Worcester Cathedral Library, the Public Record Office, and the British Museum Coin Room. I am indebted to Bob Meeson at Tamworth, Robin Brown at Saham Toney and Paul Sealey at Colchester Museum, who were all kind enough to let me use their unpublished researches.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham Research Online
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 18 August 2017 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Petts, David (2016) 'Christianity in Roman Britain.', in The Oxford handbook of Roman Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 660-81. Oxford handbooks. Further information on publisher's website: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697731.013.036 Publisher's copyright statement: This is a draft of a chapter that was accepted for publication by Oxford University Press in the book 'The Oxford Handbook of Roman Britain' edited by Martin Millett, Louise Revell, and Alison Moore and published in 2016. Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 http://dro.dur.ac.uk FINAL ACCEPTED PEER REVIEWED MANUSCRIPT: Christianity in Roman Britain David Petts The Oxford Handbook of Roman Britain Edited by Martin Millett, Louise Revell, and Alison Moore Oxford Handbooks Online Abstract and Keywords Although there is limited evidence for pre-Constantinian Christianity in Roman Britain, it is clear that in the fourth century ad the early church became increasingly widespread, partly owing to the influence of the Roman state.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Networks and Towns in Roman and Early Medieval England
    1 Transport networks and towns in Roman 2 and early medieval England: an application 3 of PageRank to archaeological questions 4 Stuart Brookes and Hoai Nguyen Huynh 5 Abstract 6 7 This paper examines the development of a road network through time to consider 8 its relationship to processes of urbanisation in Roman and early medieval England. 9 Using a popular network measure called PageRank, we classify the importance of 10 nodes in the transport network of roads and navigable waterways to assess the 11 relative location of urban places. Applying this measure we show that there is a 12 strong correlation between the status of towns in both Roman and medieval 13 periods and their proximity to transport nodes with high values of PageRank. 14 Comparison between two temporally distinct networks—Early Roman, and that 15 recorded in the Domesday survey of AD 1086—allows for a discussion about the 16 determinants of urban growth at different times. The applicability of PageRank to 17 other forms of network analysis in archaeology are offered in conclusion. 18 Highlights 19 Ranking the importance of nodes in a transport network using PageRank 20 Assessing town locations in Roman and early medieval times 21 Comparing the relative importance of road and riverine transport 22 Keywords 23 Roman Britain; Early medieval towns; transport networks; PageRank; network analysis 24 1. Introduction 25 Applications of network science (Gross and Sayama, 2009; Lewis, 2009; Wasserman and 26 Faust, 1994) to other fields have yielded interesting results and proven that promising areas 27 of research can emerge (see for e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nene Valley in Prehistoric and Roman Times
    Chapter 1 The Nene Valley in Prehistoric and Roman Times Introduction - The Early Archaeologists To understand the beginnings of human settlement around our villages we must look beyond the five parishes to the wider landscape of the Nene river valley, from the woodlands West of Wansford to where the river joins the edge of the fens East of present-day Peterborough, and from the limestone hills to the North between Upton and Marholm to the lower ground South of the river in the parishes of Water Newton and Chesterton. This stretch of the lower Nene valley has long been known for its ancient history. Antiquarians such as Camden in the 16th century and Stukeley in the 18th, described Roman remains in the area and were aware of the existence of a Roman town South of the Nene and a Roman settlement under Castor village itself. However it is the local figure, Edmund Tyrell Artis (1789-1847), who has emerged as one of the leading early British archaeologists and who first made a comprehensive study of the landscape around Castor, revealing its true importance. Artis was a talented individual, interested in natural history and geology, an accomplished artist as well as an antiquarian, but his true passion was archaeology. He was steward to Earl Fitzwilliam at Milton and between 1820 and 1828 was able to excavate sites extensively and systematically within Castor and the surrounding area. Unlike many of his contemporaries, whose main interest was in searching for ancient treasures for private collections, he measured and recorded his discoveries carefully. Artis also attempted to place this information within the wider landscape, observing how the various elements, settlements, roads, industry and temples may have related to each other, thus attempting to understand Roman society as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Age UK Cambridge and Peterborough Community Support Resource
    THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS COMMUNITY RESOURCE INFORMATION DOCUMENT UTILISES DETAILS OF RESOURCES PROVIDED ACROSS CAMBRIDGESHIRE FROM OUR PARISH, TOWN, DISTRICT AND COUNCILS - WE CANNOT MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS AND THE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED IN GOOD FAITH -OUR THANKS TO ALL CONTRIBUTORS TO THIS DOCUMENT Council Name Website Contact Number & Notes Cambridgeshire County https://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/residents/coron If you cannot complete the online form yourself (found on the link to your left) and you don’t know anyone who can complete it for you, or if you need to talk to Council avirus/coronavirus-covid-19-overview someone in another language, please call our Covid-19 Coordination hub on 0345 045 5219. New Cambridgeshire County Council Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/HowAreYouCambridgeshire/ to connect people with activities in the local community that promote positive mental wellbeing. Fenland District Council https://www.fenland.gov.uk/coronavirusresidentadvi FDC have set up a telephone hub that signposts residents towards access to food, medicine and other important services. Anyone needing help in Fenland who ce isn’t sure who to turn to can call on 01354 654321 or email [email protected] The call centre is open between 9am and 4pm, Monday to Friday. Cambridge City Council https://www.cambridge.gov.uk/coronavirus-help-for- We are working with partners across local authorities and the health service to coordinate support for those in the shielded group (those identified by NHS), those communities over 70, and those who are vulnerable. You can register to help with this effort or raise a concern about a resident by calling 0345 045 5219, emailing [email protected] Peterborough City https://www.peterborough.gov.uk/healthcare/publi If you cannot complete the online form yourself (found on the link to your left) and you don’t know anyone who can complete it for you, or if you need to talk to Council c-health/coronavirus/covid-19-coordination-hub- someone in another language, please call 01733 747474.
    [Show full text]
  • Month/Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 January 2081 3990
    Num of speeding tickets both Officer Witnessed and Camera detected Month/Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 January 2081 3990 3442 2369 1577 4166 February 1778 3241 3894 2833 3138 3899 March 1554 3706 3711 3076 2930 3240 April 748 4774 5547 3941 7464 4055 May 1105 4639 4453 5428 3660 2992 June 990 6558 4667 4295 4559 2636 July 972 6285 4012 3387 5592 2182 August 1265 4035 3612 3022 4402 1916 September 4020 3831 2519 3096 3263 1761 October 2128 3552 3291 2712 3597 2907 November 3553 2980 2127 2468 3653 2773 December 3302 2716 2842 2029 1565 2675 Age at time of offence Age Month 2015 2016 2017 2018 16 January 1 16 March 1 2 16 April 1 1 2 16 May 2 1 16 June 2 2 1 16 July 1 5 16 August 1 2 16 September 2 1 2 16 October 1 1 2 16 November 2 2 3 16 December 1 1 17 January 2 6 3 17 February 5 11 1 17 March 3 9 17 April 9 9 6 17 May 7 5 5 17 June 4 4 4 17 July 11 4 7 17 August 4 3 1 17 September 5 5 4 2 17 October 6 5 4 2 17 November 3 2 4 1 17 December 3 5 1 2 18 January 6 13 10 18 February 14 11 18 18 March 15 19 12 18 April 24 43 16 18 May 15 16 11 18 June 23 19 22 18 July 19 17 11 18 August 14 12 8 18 September 9 14 18 7 18 October 9 20 16 13 18 November 7 18 20 9 18 December 12 18 4 5 19 January 13 21 21 19 February 18 21 27 19 March 34 30 26 19 April 33 64 28 19 May 32 17 24 19 June 38 37 13 19 July 41 58 14 19 August 22 28 21 19 September 10 22 35 13 19 October 20 20 21 13 19 November 11 28 13 16 19 December 23 18 15 11 20 January 19 13 44 20 February 22 31 42 20 March 29 25 36 20 April 24 80 52 20 May 57 46 37 20 June 36 50 25 20 July
    [Show full text]
  • SN:5694 - Electronic Edition of Domesday Book: Translation, Databases and Scholarly Commentary, 1086
    This document has been created by the History Data Service and is based on information supplied by the depositor SN:5694 - Electronic Edition of Domesday Book: Translation, Databases and Scholarly Commentary, 1086 Bibliography This is not a reading list for Domesday Book and is in no way intended to supplant Bates, A Bibliography of Domesday Book (1986), which can be supplemented by Hallam, 'Some Current Domesday Research Trends and Recent Publications', in Hallam and Bates, Domesday Book, pp. 191-198. The present list contains fuller details of books and articles cited in the notes where they have been given only short titles. This is essentially a working bibliography for those re-editing the Phillimore printed edition of Domesday Book and some books and articles are included relating to counties whose revision has yet to be published. The whole bibliography will receive a full revision, when completed. It has been the policy of this revision to expand all abbreviations (so, for example, UVL is now 'ultra-violet lamp'). The only remaining abbreviation of a book-title is VCH (Victoria County History). Contibutors to the notes are, however, referred to by their initials: Books and Articles cited in the Notes • Abels, 'Introduction', Bedfordshire Domesday ... R.P. Abels, 'An Introduction to the Bedfordshire Domesday', A. Williams and G. H. Martin (eds.), The Bedfordshire Domesday (London, 1991) pp. 1-53 • Abels, 'Introduction', Hertfordshire Domesday ... R.P. Abels, 'An Introduction to the Hertfordshire Domesday', A. Williams and G. H. Martin (eds.), The Hertfordshire Domesday (London, 1991) pp. 1-36. • Abels, 'Sheriffs'… Richard Abels, 'Sheriffs, Lord-seeking and the Norman Settlement of the South-East Midlands', Anglo-Norman Studies, 19 (1997) pp.
    [Show full text]