Stone Men of Malekula on Malakula: an Ethnography of an Ethnography
Stone Men of Malekula on Malakula: An Ethnography of an Ethnography Haidy Geismar New York University, USA abstract This article examines the resonances of the voluminous ethnography, ‘Stone Men of Malekula’ (SMM) in contemporary Vanuatu. Anthropological research is politically charged in Vanuatu, in part because of how the weighty materiality of archival forms exercise significant local authority. However, alongside respect for this ‘evidential’ material is a healthy scepticism of anthropological authority. SMM, written by the maverick anthropologist John Layard in 1942 (based on fieldwork in 1914 –15), has returned to Vanuatu in many guises over the years. It is used as formal evidence in land disputes and as a bone of contention within competing claims. Tracing the ways in which culture is written, read and materialized, exposes the paradoxes of knowledge and politics not only within anthropological critique but in Vanuatu villages. keywords Ethnographic representation, text, materiality, evidence, Vanuatu his article describes some engagements between contemporary Mala- kulans (islanders from Malakula, part of the South Pacific archipelago Tof Vanuatu) and the production of anthropological knowledge, as mediated by the form and content of a single, particularly voluminous, eth- nography. Stone Men of Malekula (SMM ), published by British anthropologist and analytic psychologist John Layard in 1942, is based on fieldwork in the Small Islands and Mainland of North-East Malakula in 1914–15 and focuses primarily on the social and ritual configurations of the Small Island of Vao (Fig. 1). Today, smm is both a primary cultural resource and a highly conten- tious source of knowledge for many Small Islanders, its reach extending onto the mainland and beyond, into networks of Malakulans living in Vanuatu’s capital, Port Vila.
[Show full text]