DOCSLIB.ORG

INTRODUCTION to SOCIOLOGY Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
INTRODUCTION to SOCIOLOGY Table of Contents INTRODUCTION TO SOCIOLOGY by Dr. Ron J. Hammond SMASHWORDS EDITION * * * * * PUBLISHED BY: Dr. Ron J. Hammond and Dr. Paul Cheney on Smashwords Introduction to Sociology Copyright © 2010 by Dr. Ron J. Hammond This book is being released under a Creative Commons License of Attribution (BY). This means that you are free to use the materials contained in this work for any purpose as long as credit is given to the authors. More free books available at freebooks.uvu.edu. Table of Contents Chapter 01 History & Introduction Chapter 02 Sociological Imagination Chapter 03 Social Theories Chapter 04 Scientific Sociology Chapter 05 Culture Chapter 06 Socialization Chapter 07 Society and Groups Chapter 08 Deviance & Crime Chapter 09 Stratification Chapter 10 Sex and Gender Chapter 11 Race and Minority Chapter 12 Aging Chapter 13 Family Chapter 14 Education Chapter 15 Religion Chapter 16 Media Chapter 17 Population Chapter 18 Urbanization Chapter 19 Collective Behaviors Chapter 20 Rape & Sexual Assault * * * * * Chapter 01 - History and Introduction This New Science of Societies: Sociology Sociology is a relatively new discipline in comparison to chemistry, math, biology, philosophy and other disciplines that trace back thousands of years. Sociology began as an intellectual/philosophical effort by a French man named Auguste Comte (born 1798 and died 1857). He is considered the founder of sociology and coined "Sociology." Comte's Definition of Sociology is the science of society. In his observation Comte believed that society's knowledge passed through 3 stages which he observed in France. His life came in what he called the positivism stage (science-based). Positivism is the objective and value-free observation, comparison, and experimentation applied to scientific inquiry. Positivism was Comte's way of describing the science needed for sociology to takes its place among the other scientific disciplines. His core work, "The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte" was translated by a British- born philosopher named Harriet Martineau (1802-1876). She literally clarified Comte's original writing as she condensed it into a concise English language version. This expanded the interest in sociology to include English speakers. Martineau held values that are common today but were way before her time. She opposed oppression, especially of women and Black slaves in the US. Her own work about society which first addressed this, Society In America has been scanned and is free (public domain) to read at http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=AfT2MxEbcjQC&dq=Martineau+ %22Society+in+America%22&source=gbs_summary_s&cad=0 . Why did thinkers of the day find a need for a new science of sociology? Societies had change in unprecedented ways and had formed a new collective of social complexities that the world had never witnessed before. Western Europe was transformed by the Industrial Revolution, a technological development of knowledge and manufacturing that began in the late 1600s and continued until the early 1900s. The Industrial Revolution transformed society at every level. Look at Table 1 below to see pre and post-Industrial Revolution social patterns and how different they were. Prior to the Industrial Revolution, families lived on smaller farms and every able member of the family did work to support and sustain the family economy. Towns were small and very similar (homogamy) and families were large (more children=more workers). There was a lower standard of living and because of poor sanitation people died earlier. After the Industrial Revolution, farm work was replaced by factory work. Men left their homes and became breadwinners earning money to buy many of the goods that used to be made by hand at home (or bartered for by trading one's own homemade goods with another's). Women became the supervisors of home work. Much was still done by families to develop their own home goods while many women and children also went to the factories to work. Cities became larger and more diverse (heterogamy). Families became smaller (less farm work required fewer children). Eventually, standards of living increased and death rates declined. It is important to note the value of women's work before and after the Industrial Revolution. Hard work was the norm and still is today for most women. Homemaking included much unpaid work. For example, my 93 year old Granny is an example of this. She worked hard her entire life both in a cotton factory and at home raising her children, grand-children, and at times great grand-children. When I was a boy, she taught me how to make lye soap by saving the fat from animals they ate. She'd take a metal bucket and poked holes in the bottom of it. Then she burned twigs and small branches until a pile of ashes built up in the bottom of the bucket. After that she filtered water from the well through the ashes and collected the lye water runoff in a can. She heated the animal fat and mixed it in the lye water from the can. When it cooled, it was cut up and used as lye soap. They'd also take that lye water runoff and soak dried white corn in it. The corn kernel shells would become loose and slip off after being soaked. They'd rinse this and use it for hominy. Or grind it up and make grits from it. We'll talk more about women and work in Chapter 10. These pre and post-industrial changes impacted all of Western civilization because the Industrial Revolution hit all of these countries about the same way: Western Europe, United States, Canada, and later Japan and Australia. The Industrial Revolution brought some rather severe social conditions which included: deplorable city living conditions; crowding; crime; extensive poverty; inadequate water and sewage; early death, frequent accidents, and high illness rates. The new social problems required a new science that was unique from any scientific disciplines of the day. Comte wanted a strong scientific basis for sociology, but because of various distractions he never quite established it. Core Founders of Sociology Emile Durkheim (1858-1917) was the first to take a position in a university and because of the scientific journal he edited, L'AnnŽe Sociologique (the sociological year) and his scientific work, he was able to help sociology to become part of higher education's academic culture. He was also French and took the first position at a university as a sociology professor. Durkheim discussed Social Facts, a phenomena within society that typically exists independent of individual choices and actions. Durkheim approached a subject that most thought of as being exclusively individualistic in nature-suicide. But, he defined suicide from a social fact perspective which helped him to establish the unique wisdom of sociological analysis. To Durkheim, individual people don't cause suicide, suicide is a social fact that some members of society participate in for various social reason. Durkheim studied suicide among categories of people in various contexts in Western Europe. He found 4 distinct types of suicide that occur as social facts and that could be collectively remedied by adjusting social processes. Before we explain these let's look at 2 core sociological concepts. Social Integration is the degree to which people are connected to their social groups. Let's check your own personal degree of social integration. On a piece of paper right down how many close family members you have. Then add in how many close friends and coworkers you have. Finally add in all others whose name you know and they know yours. This number is one measure of your social integration. But, to really get an idea you might evaluate these relationships. In other words list your top 6 closest relationships in order. Make a short list of the 6 closest relationships you have. Now, rank 1 for the closest, 2 for next closest and so on up to 6th. Durkheim realized from his suicide studies that the closer we are to others, the more socially integrated we are and the less likely we are to commit suicide. The second concept to understand is called anomie. Anomie is a state of relative normlessness that comes from the disintegration of our routines and regulations. Anomie is common when we go through sudden changes in our lives or when we live in larger cities. Sudden changes bring stress and frustration. To illustrate this, I often tell my students to remember how they felt the day after high school graduation. They walk for graduation then wake up the next morning with very few demands on their time and energies. This sudden shift in demands from very intense to almost absent, leads many to feel extremely frustrated and lost. Add to that they are now adults and no longer students (children) and you get a prime formula for anomie (role shift + vague expectations about what is expected + sudden change=anomie). One of my college students told me that at the end of last semester she had 4 finals, one paper, two presentations, and one lab project all due in the last 5 days of class. She finished it all, packed, and moved back home. The first morning she woke up at home she got out her planner and realized that all she had to do that day, in other words all the demands placed upon her were to eat and shower. She was not a full-time university student for now and was between significant roles. "It took a week to get my life back into a routine for the break," she explained. As a larger social fact, anomie is a byproduct of large complex societies, especially around large cities. It's easier to get lost in the crowd, not be noticed, and to rarely receive praise or criticism for personal actions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sociological Functionalist Theory That Shapes the Filipino Social Consciousness in the Philippines
    Title: The Missing Sociological Imagination: Sociological Functionalist Theory That Shapes the Filipino Social Consciousness in the Philippines Author: Prof. Kathy Westman, Waubonsee Community College, Sugar Grove, IL Summary: This lesson explores the links on the development of sociology in the Philippines and the sociological consciousness in the country. The assumption is that limited growth of sociological theory is due to the parallel limited growth of social modernity in the Philippines. Therefore, the study of sociology in the Philippines takes on a functionalist orientation limiting development of sociological consciousness on social inequalities. Sociology has not fully emerged from a modernity tool in transforming Philippine society to a conceptual tool that unites Filipino social consciousness on equality. Objectives: 1. Study history of sociology in the Philippines. 2. Assess the application of sociology in context to the Philippine social consciousness. 3. Explore ways in which function over conflict contributes to maintenance of Filipino social order. 4. Apply and analyze the links between the current state of Philippine sociology and the threats on thought and freedoms. 5. Create how sociology in the Philippines can benefit collective social consciousness and of change toward social movements of equality. Content: Social settings shape human consciousness and realities. Sociology developed in western society in which the constructions of thought were unable to explain the late nineteenth century systemic and human conditions. Sociology evolved out of the need for production of thought as a natural product of the social consciousness. Sociology came to the Philippines in a non-organic way. Instead, sociology and the social sciences were brought to the country with the post Spanish American War colonization by the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Centennial Bibliography on the History of American Sociology
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Sociology Department, Faculty Publications Sociology, Department of 2005 Centennial Bibliography On The iH story Of American Sociology Michael R. Hill [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub Part of the Family, Life Course, and Society Commons, and the Social Psychology and Interaction Commons Hill, Michael R., "Centennial Bibliography On The iH story Of American Sociology" (2005). Sociology Department, Faculty Publications. 348. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub/348 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Sociology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociology Department, Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Hill, Michael R., (Compiler). 2005. Centennial Bibliography of the History of American Sociology. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association. CENTENNIAL BIBLIOGRAPHY ON THE HISTORY OF AMERICAN SOCIOLOGY Compiled by MICHAEL R. HILL Editor, Sociological Origins In consultation with the Centennial Bibliography Committee of the American Sociological Association Section on the History of Sociology: Brian P. Conway, Michael R. Hill (co-chair), Susan Hoecker-Drysdale (ex-officio), Jack Nusan Porter (co-chair), Pamela A. Roby, Kathleen Slobin, and Roberta Spalter-Roth. © 2005 American Sociological Association Washington, DC TABLE OF CONTENTS Note: Each part is separately paginated, with the number of pages in each part as indicated below in square brackets. The total page count for the entire file is 224 pages. To navigate within the document, please use navigation arrows and the Bookmark feature provided by Adobe Acrobat Reader.® Users may search this document by utilizing the “Find” command (typically located under the “Edit” tab on the Adobe Acrobat toolbar).
    [Show full text]
  • TIMELINES Newsletter of the ASA History of Sociology Section July 2013, No
    HISTORY OF SOCIOLOGY SECTION, AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JULY 2013, NO. 21 TIMELINES Newsletter of the ASA History of Sociology Section July 2013, No. 21 , Richard Swedberg INSIDE Message from the Chair History of Sociology as a Working Memory (Part 2) ESSAYS Message from the Chair 1 In the last issue of this news- study of good quality. Wilner Figures 3 letter I suggested that one way of My suggestion is that members of looking at the history of sociology is HOS may want to devote attention to to see it as the working memory of both of these tasks. While having EVENTS AT ASA sociology. In this brief follow-up ar- access to a high quality history of HoS Events at ASA 4-5 ticle I want to continue with this ar- sociology is important and valuable New Symposium 6 gument and spell out some of its im- to all sociologists (Task 1), it may Doctoral Students & plications. not engage their direct interest and Early Career Sociologists The history of sociology, I argue, more than, say, historians of sociolo- has two main functions. One is to gy are directly concerned with what NEWS produce the history of sociology in a is going on in one and every subfield Report: Award Panel 12 narrow sense, a bit like the task of of sociology. What immediately con- Recent publications 14 historians is to carefully write and cerns all sociologists, however, is the Book Spotlight 15 Announcement 16 analyze the history of the past. This kind of knowledge of the past that Section Awards 19 is a task that typically only experts in they need to have in order to carry Awards and Honors 19 the history of sociology will engage out their own research in a compe- in.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas, 16 | 2019 [Online], Online Since 31 December 2019, Connection on 30 July 2020
    Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas 16 | 2019 Varia Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/jihi/276 ISSN: 2280-8574 Publisher GISI – UniTo Electronic reference Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas, 16 | 2019 [Online], Online since 31 December 2019, connection on 30 July 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/jihi/276 This text was automatically generated on 30 July 2020. Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Public License 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Éditorial Manuela Albertone and Enrico Pasini Articles Rendering Sociology. On the Utopian Positivism of Harriet Martineau and the ‘Mumbo Jumbo Club’ Matthew Wilson Individualism and Social Change An Unexpected Theoretical Dilemma in Marxian Analysis Vitantonio Gioia Notes Introduction to the Open Peer-Reviewed Section on DR2 Methodology Examples Guido Bonino, Paolo Tripodi and Enrico Pasini Exploring Knowledge Dynamics in the Humanities Two Science Mapping Experiments Eugenio Petrovich and Emiliano Tolusso Reading Wittgenstein Between the Texts Marco Santoro, Massimo Airoldi and Emanuela Riviera Two Quantitative Researches in the History of Philosophy Some Down-to-Earth and Haphazard Methodological Reflections Guido Bonino, Paolo Maffezioli and Paolo Tripodi Book Reviews Becoming a New Self: Practices of Belief in Early Modern Catholicism, Moshe Sluhovsky Lucia Delaini Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas, 16 | 2019 2 Éditorial Manuela Albertone et Enrico Pasini 1 Le numéro qu’on va présenter à nos lecteurs donne deux expressions d’une histoire interdisciplinaire des idées, qui touche d’une façon différente à la dimension sociologique. Une nouvelle attention au jeune Marx est axée sur le rapport entre la formation de l’individualisme et le contexte historique, que l’orthodoxie marxiste a négligé, faute d’une connaissance directe des écrits de la période de la jeunesse du philosophe allemand.
    [Show full text]
  • RECONSTRUCTING the HISTORY of SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY It Is
    RECONSTRUCTING THE HISTORY OF SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY Roscoe C. Hinkle Ohio State University Mid-American Review of Sociology, 1982, Vol. VII, No.1 :37-53 It is curious that sociologists have never engaged in any serious or sustained discourse on the criteria for constituting histories of sociological theory-thought, though the interest in such history generally dates back at least to Giddings and Small. From the earliest volume by Bristol on Social Adaptation in 1915 up to Turner's and Beeghley's The Emergence ofSociologi­ cal Theory in 1981, the prefaces, prologues, and introductions are conspicuously devoid of any consideration of the general problem of just how such undertakings are to be constituted. Other literature is pervasively lacking in the treatment of the problem. Even Merton's chapter "On the History and Systema­ tics of Sociological Theory," which introduces his On Theoretical Sociology in 19.67, does not directly tackle the problem. And with the exception of one roundtable in 1978, the same void has been characteristic of the American Sociological Association meetings since at least World War II. To use the words ofrecent French structuralism, a curious silence has prevailed. It is the pur­ pose of this paper to end that silence, to induce reflection, and to stimulate and promote the beginnings of .theoretical dis­ course on the problem of the nature of an acceptable history of sociological theory-thought. Admittedly, several somewhat unusual circumstances may have occasioned this current lamentable state of affairs. Unlike other fields, the history of sociological theory seems to owe its existence more to pedagogical than to research considerations.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSFORMATIONS Mprntiw Study Of& Tm~Zsfmmations
    TRANSFORMATIONS mprntiw study of& tm~zsfmmations CSST WORKING PAPERS The University of Michigan Ann Arbor "What We Talk About When We. Talk About History: The Conversations of History and Sociology" Terrence McDonald CSST Working CRSO Working Paper #52 Paper #44 2 October 1990 What We ~alkAbout When We Talk About ~istory: The Conversations of History and.Sociology1 Terrence J. McDonald As the epigraph for his enormously influential 1949 book Social Theorv and Social Structure Robert K. Merton selected the now well known opinion of Alfred North Whitehead that Ita science which hesitates to forget its founders is lost.tt And both history and sociology have been struggling with the implications of that statement ever since. On the one hand, it was the belief that it was possible to forget one's ttfounderswthat galvanized the social scientists (including historians) of Mertonfs generation to reinvent their disciplines. But on the other hand, it was the hubris of that view that ultimately undermined the disciplinary authority that they set out to construct, for in the end neither their propositions about epistemology or society could escape from "history."2 Social and ideological conflict in American society undermined the correspondence between theories of consensus and latent functions and the Itrealitynthey sought to explain; the belief in a single, scientific, transhistorical road to cumulative knowledge was assaulted by theories of paradigms and incommensurability; marxist theory breached the walls of both idealism and the ideology of scientific neutrality only to be overrun, in its turn, by the hordes of the ttpoststt:post-positivism, post-modernism, post-marxism, post-structuralism, and others too numerous to mention.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Sociology in the United States
    THE DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIOLOGY IN THE UNITED STATES ——— JOHN LEWIS GILLIN University of Wisconsin ——— ABSTRACT The origin of sociology in the United States. — Why sociology arose in the United States following the Civil War. Character of early sociology in the United States. Characterization of the sociology of the pioneers Ward, Sumner, Small, Giddings, Ross, Cooley, Thomas. Tendencies in early American sociology. Development of sociology in the United States since the pioneers. Relation of sociology to social work. Sociology as a university subject. Hesitancy to use the term “sociology” in university curricula. The progress of sociology. ——— Sociology is usually supposed to have begun with Comte. As a matter of fact, however, there were a number of presociological movements, in which certain men manifested the beginning of the sociological attitude. To a sociologist it looks as if those responsible for the abolition of slavery in the British colonies had sociological insight. Chalmers, in his objective study of dependency in his parish in Edinburgh, and in his policy based on that study, showed a sociological attitude. Pinel, who as the result of his study of the results of the traditional methods of treating the insane, struck off the restraints and adopted humane methods, attacked the problem as a modern sociologist. Beccaria, in so far as he faced frankly the effects of age-old methods of treating the criminal and suggested other methods based upon a study of results, was a sociologist. The striking thing about all of these examples is that the men mentioned adopted a new attitude in the study of social problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: a Historical Sketch of Sociological Theory the Early Years
    1 A Historical Sketch of Sociological Theory The Early Years distribute Chapter Outline or Introduction Premodern Sociological Theory Social Forces in the Development of Sociological Theory Intellectual Forces and the Rise of Sociological Theory The Development of French Sociology post, The Development of German Sociology The Origins of British Sociology The Key Figure in Early Italian Sociology Non-European Classical Theory The Contemporarycopy, Relevance of Classical Sociological Theory his book is designed as an introduction to the work of the classical socio- Tlogical theorists, and we begin with one-sentence statements that get to the essence of the theories to be covered in these pages: •not• We are headed to an increasingly centralized world with less individual freedom. (Alexis de Tocqueville) •• We are moving in the direction of a world dominated by science. Do (Auguste Comte) •• Societies evolve through competition between their members and with other societies. (Herbert Spencer) •• Capitalism is based on the exploitation of the workers by the capitalists. (Karl Marx) 3 Copyright ©2021 by SAGE Publications, Inc. This work may not be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means without express written permission of the publisher. 4 Part I • Introduction to Classical Sociological Theory •• The modern world offers less moral cohesion than did earlier societies. (Emile Durkheim) •• The modern world is an iron cage of rational systems from which there is no escape. (Max Weber) •• Modern identities and relationships are shaped by the unique experience of city life. (Georg Simmel) •• Gender inequality explains most of individual experience, the ills in society, and history. (Charlotte Perkins Gilman) •• Race is one of the most important organizing categories of modern societies (W.
    [Show full text]
  • Ibn Khaldun As a Paradigm for the Past and Future of Sociology and Humanity
    Sociology International Journal Review Article Open Access Ibn Khaldun as a paradigm for the past and future of sociology and humanity Abstract Volume 4 Issue 5 - 2020 Ibn Khaldun is main sources of historiography, orientalism in medieval, despite of more Dr. Mohammareza Shahidipak than one thousands writings about his opinions many scholars are unaware of his dignity Islamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch, Iran and they think historiography did not continue after Thucydides and Herodotus and has stopped in ancient, therefore place of Islamic historiography in medieval, it has not yet Correspondence: Dr. Mohammareza Shahidipak, Islamic Azad been determined, while existence of Ibn Khaldun is sufficient to prove it as international University Central Tehran Branch, Iran, paradigm. He uses term humanities based on empirical reason for first time in his book, Email AL-Moqadimmah, he explained evolution of civilization by natural causes centuries before Vico (1744), Montesquieu, August Comte, any orientalist as Gibb (1895) considered Received: September 04, 2020 | Published: October 30, 2020 Ibn Khaldun as oriental theorist, father of sociology that has developed humanities with Western secularism a few centuries earlier than Europe. Paper examines theory of whether Ibn Khaldun is model suitable for humanities in past and future of world because he explained important principles of social changes and sociology of human sciences, as happiness, prosperity, devotion of individual, social structure, society, and transformation of societies from simple to complicated societies. In contemporary, most important subject of humanity is social change of Collapse , decay of societies and media dealt, in product of 2018 Artemis film anarchism, decay and degeneration in Los Angeles.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Clinical Sociology
    Sociological Practice Volume 7 Issue 1 The Development of Clinical and Applied Article 11 Sociology January 1989 The iH story of Clinical Sociology Jan M. Fritz Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/socprac Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Fritz, Jan M. (1989) "The iH story of Clinical Sociology," Sociological Practice: Vol. 7: Iss. 1, Article 11. Available at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/socprac/vol7/iss1/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Access Journals at DigitalCommons@WayneState. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociological Practice by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@WayneState. The History of Clinical Sociology Jan M. Fritz The origins of sociology are found in many times and places. Sociologists typically write that their field developed in Western Europe during the mid- 1800s. They mention the early sociologists' interest in understanding society and making the world better and then they cite the same names—Auguste Comte, Emile Durkheim and Max Weber. Most mention the contribution of Karl Marx although the amount and kind of coverage generally clearly indicates the sociologist's (usually unstated) theoretical view. Quickly, then, a sociologist moves on to a rather lengthy discussion of whether sociology is a science. The conclusion is always in the affirmative. There are other histories, however. These views of the field are not yet researched very thoroughly or so widely known but they take nothing away from the view of sociology as a science. Instead, they add to this picture by showing there are other threads running through the general history of the discipline.
    [Show full text]
  • Sociology of Law
    This page intentionally left blank Sociology of Law Since the classic contributions of Weber and Durkheim, the sociology of law has raised key questions on the place of law in society. Drawing together both theoretical and empirical themes, Mathieu Deflem reviews the field’s major accomplishments and reveals the value of the multiple ways in which sociologists study the social structures and processes of law. He discusses both historical and contemporary issues, from early theoretical foundations and the work of Weber and Durkheim, through the contribution of sociological jurisprudence, to the development of modern perspectives to clarify how sociologists study law. Chapters also look at the role of law in relation to the economy, politics, culture, and the legal profession; and aspects of law enforcement and the globalization of law. This book will appeal to scholars and students of the sociology of law, jurisprudence, social and political theory, and social and political philosophy. mathieu deflem is Associate Professor in the Department of Sociology at the University of South Carolina. He has published dozens of articles in journals and books, is the author of Policing World Society (2002) and the editor of Sociologists in a Global Age (2007), Sociological Theory and Criminological Research (2006), Terrorism and Counter- Terrorism (2004) and Habermas, Modernity and Law (1996). His website is www.mathieudeflem.net Sociology of Law Visions of a Scholarly Tradition mathieu deflem University of South Carolina CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521857253 © Mathieu Deflem 2008 This publication is in copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • TIMELINES March 2005 E-Newsletter Number 2
    Section on the History of Sociology TIMELINES March 2005 E-Newsletter Number 2 Part II WHAT IS THE HISTORY OF SOCIOLOGY? Inside this issue: Susan Hoecker-Drysdale This is a continuation of the etc? The third question is: What is Announcements 2 article in Volume 1, Issue 1, of our the history of sociology? What new online version of Timelines. constitutes the actual (if such) HOS Web Site 3 The comments and issues raised historical narrative of its are meant to provoke thought and development internationally and in Chair’s Comments 4 discussion about our interests and America, specifically? Is it the goals as sociologists who regard history of theories, of empirical Biography Project 5 the history of the discipline to be studies, of concepts, of schools, of JHS Archives critical to our sociological individuals, of time periods, stages 5 understanding. of development, etc.? The Member 5 Previously, we had considered, approaches and perspectives are Publications however briefly, the question of many. Albion Small himself takes Centennial 7 what constitutes the history of as his reference the developments Bibliography sociology, that is, of what we in economics and political science Items of Interest 8 understand the history of sociology in Germany to show the emergence to consist. What are the critical of schools and the movement of HOS 2005-06 9 data? In other words, the history of economic theory towards sociology Council Nominee what? What history, whose history, (Small, 1924). Sociology, he Profiles are we tracking? Secondly, we asserts,
    [Show full text]